Monday, May 19, 2025
Blog Page 858

‘Plebs’ triumphs despite low expectations

0

Billed as The Inbetweeners in Ancient Rome, critical expectations were not high for Plebs when it first aired on ITV2 in 2013. Many compared it to an inferior version of Blackadder, and its combination of deliberately anachronistic idioms and a traditionally serious setting was predicted to be a flop à la The Last Days of Pompeii. It is a credit to writer-creator team Tom Basden and Sam Leifer that Plebs has just been renewed for a fourth series, having earned a BAFTA nomination and broken ITV viewing records.

The premise of the show is simple: Marcus (Tom Rosenthal) and Stylax (Joel Fry), two desperate young men hailing from suburbia, move to Rome with their slave Grumio (Ryan Sampson) and attempt to impress girls and hold down jobs in the big city, right at the height of Rome’s imperial power. While the stereotypes are certainly present—the first episode is named ‘The Orgy’, and a cameo from Danny Dyer as a macho gladiator is not to be missed—the show is very aware of the epic tradition it is channelling, and reconciles its grandiose setting (which uses, in fact, the same purpose-built studio as Spartacus and 300: Rise of an Empire) with decidedly 21st Century language and humour.

By transplanting modern dilemmas into a classical setting, Plebs manages to be both funny and original. For example, Marcus’s attempts to woo long-term love interest Cynthia at the Roman festival of Saturnalia is evocative of a New Year’s Eve party, and a somewhat taboo debate about the pros and cons of porn is introduced with the arrival of an erotically decorated vase. This is all accompanied by an upbeat and jovial ska soundtrack, which contributes to a general feeling that history and modernity have been reconciled in this cheerful production.

For those looking, the classical references and nods towards history that do crop up are wonderfully understated and unassuming. From the use of red-coloured Corinthian columns on temples, to the prevalence of graffiti similar to that found at Pompeii, Plebs is far more self-aware than its idiomatic dialogue would suggest. Particularly delicious is the moment in series three when Marcus and new girlfriend Delphine have a night in to catch up on box sets—the box set in question being Virgil’s Aeneid, newly released.

For those select, classically-trained viewers who picked up on the fact that ‘Grumio’ and ‘Metella’ have been lifted straight out of the Cambridge Latin Course, it may come as no surprise that one of the writers, Sam Leifer, studied Classics at Oxford, and that the show had Mary Beard on board as a historical consultant. Consequently, what could be a gimmick in fact becomes a defining attribute of the show, and one that the writers never lose sight of. The storylines, while incorporating aspects of modern life, are nonetheless very grounded in the classical setting, with minor subplots about Roman religion, incest, and political marriage.

This is not to say that Plebs is inaccessible to those not versed in Plato and Horace—the humour is adult and far more universal than merely a few jokes about colosseums and phalluses. In fact, it is this aspect of the show that is so appealing—the fact that almost in spite of the setting, at the heart of the production, is a universal and relatable human scenario. The humour of Stylax learning to do a three-point turn in his chariot needs no grounding in Greek verse to understand. It is this that makes Plebs such an original, self-aware, and engaging adult comedy.

For my interview with Plebs writer and creator Tom Basden, check out Cherwell Broadcasting.

Torpids, trashings, and other traditions

0

Bops, battels, blazers, fifth week blues, carnations, collections, crew dates, college marriages, cuppers, quads, subfusc, sconcing, sharking, shoeing, scouts, porters, pidges, punting, plodge, matriculation, trashings, tutes, Torpids, JCR, MCR, SCR.

For those at Oxford, there’s nothing strange about this list. These words form an important part of our everyday vocabulary, and their meanings a valuable part of our everyday life. But for people outside of the Oxford bubble, it’s a foreign language.

Oxford traditions are a crucial part of our student experience, but for those unacquainted with Oxford’s quirks, they can appear elitist and alienating. Some of the greatest moments we have at this university are our experiences of these traditions. Matriculation is a rite of passage: it’s the day that we’re allowed to be proud, even smug, about the fact we managed to make it to Oxford. As Maisie, a JCR Access Rep, says: “events like matriculation made me realise how lucky I am to be studying here.” For one day, we are allowed to acknowledge that being here is, in itself, an achievement.

As annoying as it is to scroll through your Facebook feed in mid-October and only see excitable freshers clad in subfusc re-enacting that famous Bullingdon Club photo, it is the moments like these that we remember. These traditions are more than just a source for Facebook likes, they make us feel like we’re part of something.

It may be a pain not being able to sit exams in more comfortable clothes, but there is something to be said for the ceremony of putting on subfusc: adding the ribbon/tie/bow-tie, putting on the gown, and pinning on the first white carnation which had (hopefully, if they didn’t forget) been bought by your college family and put in your pidge. Subfusc has been a contentious issue in the past, with OUSU conducting a student referendum in 2014 about getting rid of it. Given that 75.8 per cent (6403 students) voted to keep it, it’s clear where the students stand. Despite its oddness, we love subfusc.

It does definitely has its perks. In the same way we enjoy dressing up in black tie for the balls, it can be fun to put on subfusc. Even when looking at the concept from an access perspective, it isn’t all bad. On one hand, subfusc is designed to separate town from gown.

Yet, on the other hand, subfusc acts as a school uniform. It is an equaliser. Just as, when we were at school, uniform prevented judgement based on clothing—the same applies for subfusc. Once we are in subfusc, we all appear equal—we’ll all be equally screwed anyway if that one topic comes up that no one understands.

This was one of the main arguments put forward during the subfusc referendum in 2014. At the time, one student campaigner, Harrison Edmonds, said: “I think it sends a positive message from the students in Oxford that subfusc isn’t elitist but is egalitarian. No matter your background, race, class or gender, when you go into exams wearing the gown, you are equal.”

Indeed, as another Oxford student, Vicky, says: “It’s just some clothes, so really not that deep—it’s not like we all go around doing Bullingdon club-esque activities all day everyday—the traditions are kind of endearing in that sense?”

The uniform aspect also helps to put people in an exam mind-set. There are some traditions which we need to re-evaluate, but in the same way that we shouldn’t just blindly accept the institutions and traditions we have inherited at Oxford, we should not mindlessly reject them out of fear of being branded as pretentious and elitist. Some of these traditions retain their meaning; they are still important to students.

Oxford traditions and lingo help to form a unified student identity. For many, the collegiate system dominates a lot of what we do here. When so much of our university life revolves around college, we need things that unite us as Oxford students—other than the sense of impending dread when beginning an essay crisis or entering a tute far less prepared than you would have liked. We all have college families, wear carnations to exams, and spend extortionate amounts of money on confetti in Celebrations—these are traditions that unite us.

We do still need to remember that our jargon and traditions can appear superior and have damaging effects. It doesn’t take long for the traditions and terminology of Oxford to become routine. Our familiarity with trashings, tutes, and Torpids often allows us to forget that, for the majority, these words are meaningless. It becomes a problem when these traditions and terminology become alienating. It may just be your friend visiting from another university sitting quietly for ten minutes while you’re chatting before eventually asking ‘what are bops?’. But it may also be a nervous 17-year-old, already daunted by Oxford, finding that these traditions cement their fears of the posh, old, intimating university.

This opinion was echoed by some of the people who I spoke to. Maisie said: “A student considering applying here could easily be put off when hearing about all of these alien traditions, as it could definitely make you feel like you wouldn’t fit in, or Oxford isn’t for people like you.”

Even if the only impact is that someone visiting from another university is confused and alienated during conversation, and there is no impact on prospective applicants, this can still be damaging. It perpetuates the Oxford stereotype amongst our peers and creates an elitist image which will follow us into the workplace.

It is important that we continue to check ourselves. Especially in the context of open days and other opportunities to interact with prospective students who may be intimidated by the vast, confusing system that is Oxford, we need to remain vigilant. They’ll learn the difference between Hilary and Trinity when they get here, but for the time being it’s vital that they still want the chance to get here.

For some, a part of that decision will be determined by whether Oxford lives up to the snobbish image it retains. As Immie, a member of Pembroke JCR, points out: “when they are taken too seriously they can become more than symbols of the university’s culture and can be used by some to exclude others.”

The University continues to try to shake this image, putting increasing amounts of money towards the cause. Speaking to Cherwell on the topic of Oxford traditions and their possible negative impact on outreach, a spokesperson from the University said: “Outreach activities such as the annual UNIQ summer school bring students from under-represented backgrounds to Oxford to become familiar with its colleges, tutorial system and traditions.

“This allows young people to see for themselves what life as a student here is really like.”

Yet all this can fall short if the students themselves don’t reflect the image the university aim to put forward. Avoiding the foreign language that is Oxford lingo is a small step, but a crucial one.

Talking to students in Oxford, a few things became obvious. It was clear that these traditions are close to our hearts—they make Oxford unique and we shouldn’t underestimate the positive impact they can have. People love dressing up for bops and going to formal.

Many traditions are not just there for the sake of it—they are maintained because they are enjoyable in themselves. The fact that they are Oxford-specific traditions is irrelevant to our enjoyment of them.

Yet people are conflicted. We all know of the pretentiousness that is associated with Oxford, and have had the conversations with friends at other universities insisting that it’s ‘not that bad’. Equally, we can’t help but enjoy formals, croquet, and crew dates. We should also recognise that Oxford is not alone in having traditions and quirks. All universities share in these oddities, it’s just that the list is longer for Oxford.

For the time being, our traditions and jargon are here to stay. Oxford’s peculiarities may have the ability to be damaging, but we shouldn’t immediately run to abolish them—they hold a special place in our hearts. Going into that last exam wouldn’t be as tolerable without the red carnation, and coming out of it definitely wouldn’t be as fun without the trashing.

The shifting landscape of television news

What is happening to television news?

This question, the focus of a report by former Director of BBC News, Richard Sambrook, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Director of Research at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, is on the minds of many of the world’s major news organisations.

After all, television viewing in the UK and the US has declined, on average, by three to four per cent per year since 2012, something that Sambrook and Kleis Nielsen believe is comparable to the declines in print newspaper circulation at the beginning of this century. Young people are moving online for their news: iPhone apps, Facebook ‘Live’ reporting, and Twitter ‘Moments’ are becoming more and more popular in the 21st Century.

The report, published by the Reuters Institute, draws out many of the core issues surrounding the future of television news, but perhaps the key idea presented in the thirty-page document is that of experimentation.

The authors note: “The need for experimentation is for us the most important conclusion from this review of what is happening to television news. We know traditional television is important but eroding. We know online video is growing rapidly and will continue to become more important as digital media becomes ever more important.

“And we know that finding the right way forward between these trends will require constant adaptation and a willingness to change, to try things out, to fail, and to learn from failure without losing sight of the underlying urgent need to change.”

This change undoubtedly revolves around the digital age. Broadcasters, both publicly and privately owned, can move ahead in a variety of ways. The report draws upon the work of Lucy Küng, who has identified seven features that innovative digital news organisations have in common: a clear sense of purpose, unequivocal strategic focus, strong leadership, a pro-digital culture, deep integration of digital technology talent and editorial talent, digital operations with a high degree of autonomy from legacy operations, and an early start relative to their competitors.

These are just words in a report, for now. Sambrook and Kleis note that traditional news providers have not put these features in place, as many key figures in broadcasting regard digital media “with a mix of scepticism, fear, and incomprehension rather than see them as a set of challenges to be confronted and opportunities to be seized.”

For television news to succeed, providers need to face the onrush of new challenges and make the most of the opportunities provided by the flourishing field of digital media. There is a future for television broadcasters; after all, the US population alone watches more than one billion hours of television every day.

However, as the report concludes, there is a clear opportunity for the world’s digital players—such as Google TV, Apple TV, and Amazon TV—to combine digital news with televised broadcasts.

There must be a balance: a balance between television and online broadcasting. The video market is ready to be conquered, while television remains an important vehicle for reaching large audiences.

The future of television news is aptly summarised by Sambrook and Kleis Nielson:

“The question should not be what will replace traditional television news. Nothing will. The question has to be how can we move beyond television news as we know it?”

Vice-Chancellor urged to renew commitment to city cyclists

An open letter to the Vice-Chancellor has called for Oxford’s renewed commitment to the safety of cyclists in the city centre.

The move comes after Claudia Comberti, a DPhil student at the Environmental Change Institute, was run over and killed on Tuesday 9 May by a bus on Botley Road.

An inquest led by Coroner Darren Salter found on Wednesday: “When the lights changed she lost balance and fell sideways and was run over by the bus.”

The open letter, along with a petition addressed to Vice-Chancellor Louise Richardson, asks for the University to restate its position on asking for the University of Oxford “to state its official position on road traffic to the Oxfordshire County Council as no private cars or motorbikes [should be allowed] within the area of town bounded by University and college property.

“Clearly marked and wide cycle lanes on all major roads throughout the Oxford area; and Physical barriers, such as kerbs, between cycle and vehicle lanes.”

At the time of writing, the petition had received in excess of 2,400 signatures. It also received public support from Sebastian Comberti, Claudia’s father.

He said in a statement: “If my beloved daughter’s death could achieve any possible good, it would make my heart very slightly less broken.”

The petition additionally asked for greater investment and publicity for cycle safety courses. Around 600 people dressed in bright coloured clothes gathered in Broad Street last Friday for a mass bike ride to celebrate Comberti’s life.

Broken Spoke bike co-operative, with which Comberti was involved and which is looking to improve the safety of cycling in Oxford after her death, said: “Claudia was a friend to us all at the Spoke, and a much loved member of our community. She embodied that which we try to create and nourish—a love of the world and its people, the outdoors, a zest for life, of living what you believe.

“On Friday something incredible happened—the biggest mass bike ride Oxford has ever seen. They came because they could no longer accept the danger we face when we ride our bikes on the roads of our city.”

“The feeling of strength, visibility, solidarity was palpable. We created safety in our numbers, a temporary space for ourselves to cycle without fear. We rode for three hours. It was an unprecedented and unique event.”

In a joint statement Professor Heather Viles, Head of the School of Geography and the Environment, and Sir Ivor Roberts, President of Trinity College said: “Claudia Comberti’s tragic death in a road accident has come as a great shock to everyone at Trinity College and at the School of Geography and the Environment.

“During her doctoral studies she lived and worked extensively in the Bolivian Amazon amongst the Tacana II peoples, and she leaves many friends and memories there. Our thoughts are with Claudia’s family, friends and colleagues at this very sad time.”

Speaking to Cherwell, an Oxford University spokesperson said: “The sympathies of everyone at Oxford University are with all those affected by the tragic death of our student Claudia Comberti last week, and we applaud this campaign’s efforts improve safety on Oxford’s roads.

“Cycling safety is a priority issue for us, and we offer our students and staff free cycle safety training and discounted D-locks, lights and arm bands. We regularly meet with Oxfordshire County Council to give our feedback on their transport plans, and to lobby for improved facilities for cyclists in Oxford.”

The campaign group End Cycling Deaths in Oxford, said: “The University is the dominant force in this city and gives a huge amount to it. It is in a strong position to ask for changes—and only through material changes can we prevent the loss of yet another life.”

Torpids trophies inequality

0

Oxford University Rowing Clubs (OURC) has voted to launch an investigation after it emerged on Tuesday that the women’s teams who win Torpids do not receive a trophy, unlike their male counterparts.

Women have been able to enter Torpids since 1969, although the winners have never received a trophy.

Women’s teams who win Summer VIIIs do receive trophies. A captain of one of the men’s college boats told Cherwell: “We voted unanimously in favour of the committee investigating [getting] trophies which would record all winners of women’s Torpids back to its inception.”

He continued: “[It’s] really important that they are recognised along with the men seeing as they do exactly the same race, and it’s just very unfair that they wouldn’t be rewarded the same. Hopefully we will see this rectified by the OURCs.

“Whilst it will probably be quite expensive to put in place, for me, and I’m sure the majority of the other captains, it’s a point of principle that we uphold a commitment to equal opportunity.”

The co-captain of the Balliol women’s team, Nermeen Hilton, who also attended the meeting, said: “We absolutely want there to be a trophy for the women at Torpids.

“It’s a great inequality, and knowing people who have won the headship for other colleges we think it’s a real shame that there isn’t a trophy.

“In fact, there’s only a women’s trophy for [Summer] Eights because gracious Balliol donors Andrew and Peggoty Graham bought one when Balliol women won the headship in 2010.” Other students voiced their concern over the discrepancy.

Second year student Violet Smart, who rows for Mansfield, told Cherwell: “To hear of such blatant injustice within the collegiate rowing system is a massive shame.

“Both men’s and women’s teams put in enormous amounts of effort for Torpids and Summer VIIIs and for many college rowers these competitions form the apex of their university rowing careers.

“It’s easy to trivialise matters like these, but I think it’s important that we stop perpetuating the image that gender limits the potential of sportspeople.

“To win Torpids as a a male or a female is just as much of an achievement, and that should be recognised in the same manner for both teams.”

Tom Coles, Sabbatical Officer for OURCs, told Cherwell: “OURCs was only made aware of the absence of a trophy shortly before the meeting where this was raised.

“The current trophies (the two trophies for Eights and the men’s trophy for Torpids) long pre-date the existence of OURCs as an organisation and are handled directly by the headship clubs without the involvement of OURCs.”

Coles added: “The current ownership of the trophies is unclear, but can be traced back to Oxford University Boat Club and is apparently lent out on a year-by-year basis.

“As resolved at the meeting—with the unanimous support of both the committee and the captains—we will be investigating ways to fix this inequality as a matter of priority.”

Women’s crews first rowed for the University in 1927, but it was only in 1974 when more colleges started admitting female undergraduates that female college level rowing took off.

Cyber experts encouraged to “redouble their efforts” following attacks

0

After a wave of cyber attacks that struck the world this week, Oxford experts have called on governments and computer users to take cybersecurity seriously.

The attack, which started on Friday and affected businesses and public bodies across the globe, including NHS hospitals and GP surgeries in Oxfordshire, has left victims and experts wondering who was responsible for the failure to stop the breach.

Responding to the cyber threats, Peter Knight, chief information and digital officer at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said that security measures were in place to protect systems: “Our strong security measures are holding solid.

“We continue to closely monitor the situation and have asked staff to be vigilant. Protecting patient information is our top priority. “We understand that NHS Digital has set up a dedicated incident line, and suppliers are working to find solutions to this ransomware outbreak,” he said.

Dr Ravishankar Borgaonkar, Research Fellow at the Department of Computer Science, told Cherwell: “The whole incident shed light on the speed with which we are making our society digital and spending less on making them secure”, blaming the attacks on the “poor management of networks”.

Andrew Martin, Professor of Systems Security at Kellogg College urged onlookers not to “blame the people who click”, arguing that rather than blaming the unscrupulous individual who clicks on a malicious email attachment, society should respond to such attacks by improving its security programming.

As well as this, he discussed how modern systems must not be vulnerable to attacks that exploit one individual’s momentary inattention.

Speaking to Cherwell this week, Professor Martin said: “Security experts have been anticipating things like this for years”. He called on the rest of society finally to take expert warnings seriously.

However, striking a tone of mutual responsibility, Professor Martin also conceded that it was up to experts like him to “redouble their efforts”. He argued that the excessive expectations of many experts had contributed to warnings being ignored.

Professor Martin warned of increasingly dire consequences, if the issues continue to be neglected. Appliances from ovens to medical equipment are increasingly being connected to the internet, forming what is known as ‘the internet of things’.

This trend means that cyberattacks will increasingly be able to cause damage that is physical rather than just informational, Professor Martin warned.

“Internet of things devices are potentially dangerous in a way that our old-fashioned information systems and file servers are not. What if all the dashboards on the M25 suddenly demanded a $300 payment?”

Not only are such devices capable of more harm if hacked, they are also more vulnerable to attack than conventional devices: “We’re rapidly deploying millions of new devices whose typical security characteristics are rather worse than those of a PC 15 years ago.”

No breaches of the Oxford University network have been reported.

Professor Martin praised the cybersecurity of the University, listing up-to-date systems and an enviable number of excellent staff among the system’s strengths: “Many organisations would be jealous of our numbers”.

The professor of Systems Security went on to counsel against complacency, however, and recommended that students should not be afraid to ask difficult questions about how their data is handled.

Colleges have reminded students to remain vigilant and to make sure that their devices are equipped with the latest anti-virus software and that their operating systems are also kept up to date with the latest protection software.

The weekend’s attack on the NHS was not exclusive to the UK. FedEx were also targeted, as were Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s rail network.

Security software manufacturers Avast say they have seen 57,000 infections in 99 countries.

“The play-text should never have been selected for performance”

0

As we process from a drizzly English evening into the Michael Pilch Studio, we enter a charming new world. Director Catherine Dimitroff hands us a programme which is designed to resemble an invitation to the wedding of Tracey Marlowe and Scott McClure. They’re a winning Tennessee twosome (she works for Pepsi you know), and it’s the summer of 1993. An elegant and detailed bedroom set (designed by Mira Liu) will house the action, which never directly features the happy couple—instead the focus is upon five young bridesmaids, who’ve managed to escape the festivities, and who differ greatly in their outlooks upon life. They are linked by only two things: a dislike of the bride, and a common experience of sex and attention from one Tommy Valentine (who also doesn’t feature). In a comedy of pinball movements between bed and vanity, vanity and window, the five women reveal, conceal and dispute their vulnerabilities to create, according to co-director Lara Marks, “a strong sense of female solidarity”.

The problem is with the foundation on which that solidarity is built—it is startlingly out of date. A large majority of the conversation centres upon the characters’ experiences with men, and the companionship which they build throughout the play is based upon a shared oppositional stance and little else. The trouble with this is that it necessarily complicates any attempt to individuate the women, and its result is an unhappy stereotyping that is unfortunately evident in this production. The actors all teeter on the edge of melodrama as they steer their characters around the stage, blending exaggerated gestures with weak southern accents and struggling to convince anyone that they are forming genuine emotional connections. The comic timing switch is stuck resolutely in the ‘off’ position, meaning that the cast generate fewer laughs than the ostensibly funny play-text caters for.

It is to be noted, however, that this was an opening night, and each individual performance improves as time progresses. During the interval the cast remain on stage in silent conversation, a directorial innovation which is effective in maintaining the play’s unity of time and establishing continuity between acts. The second act features the emergence of Mindy, played with real nuance by Lucia Proctor-Bonbright, the strongest performer by some distance (and deserving of a larger role). Things also become decidedly more serious, as a revelation is made which brings the play onto a discussion of more topical matters.

The point I have been approaching is this: most of the problems with this production reside in the play-text itself, which should never have been selected for performance. The female identity which it celebrates is crude, caricatured and, most troublingly, based upon assumptions which border upon being prescriptive, and would seem only to entrench the divides which the play laments. Contemporary feminism is certainly not problem-free, (nor does it comprise only one outlook), but it is not prescriptivist, and most consider this its strength. This play, sadly, never really leaves the past in which it is set.

Music without Borders: Welsh national music

0

Wales is a musical nation. Only last week we saw Welsh schoolgirl choir Angelicus Celtis win the hearts of the nation on Britain’s Got Talent. It was not only their voices that captured our attention, but their performance, their passion and their story. Fundamentally that’s what Welsh music is all about: telling a moving story.

Traditionally, music in Wales was associated with chapel-goers, those who participated in cultural events such as the Eisteddfod, and large, predominately male choirs, that had power and depth in their singing. The folk related music of Wales can, of course, be associated with the Celtic past of other countries such as Scotland and Ireland too. However, Wales has distinctive instrumentation and song types, and is often heard at a twmpath (folk dance session), gwyl werin (folk festival) or noson lawen (a traditional party similar to the Gaelic “Céilidh”).

Of course, Wales has its own distinctive choirs too. We have seen the national and international success of these choirs over the last few decades, and the advent of talent shows such as Britain’s Got Talent is one way to ensure that this aspect of Welsh music is still heard today. Male voice choirs in particular are synonymous in Wales, such as the Morriston Orpheus Choir and Treorchy Male Voice Choir. Choirs often have a role in sporting events ever since the national anthem, ‘Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau’, was sung for the first time at a rugby game in 1905.

But, perhaps we shouldn’t get too caught up in this historic aspect of Welsh music. Of course, its allowed singers to express our past, our language, and our culture. Yet, Welsh music has also had an influential role in the modern era.

Tom Jones, Shirley Bassey and Shakin’ Stevens are just a few names which come to mind when thinking of modern Welsh pop sensations. We’re not all about the choirs and folk music, as these pop and rock bands have been huge sensations across the world.

Intriguingly, Wales is perhaps one of the only countries that can have a mixture of traditional, folk, pop, rock and choirs succeeding in the modern era. Perhaps the reason that Welsh music continues today is the fact that there is so much support and investment in Welsh music: BBC Wales, BBC Cymru, S4C, and The Pop Factory have all been ways for audiences to see the up-and-coming artists of the day.

Organisations that support the Welsh language, such as Mentrau Iaith Cymru, The National Eisteddfod and BBC Radio Cymru have had their national ‘Battle of the Bands,’ where Welsh bands can compete for £1000, and were given the opportunity to perform at one of the most prolific Welsh music festivals: Maes B.

Of course, there are issues with funding too. Dafydd Iwan, a Welsh rock singer, once said that there were “no stars in Wales” due to the lack of financial reward and the poor music venues. That has arguably changed since Iwan’s prime in the 1970s and 80s. The Millennium Centre and Principality Stadium are some of the most beautiful venues in the world, and there has been more funding for Welsh music production in recent years.

More could be done—such as developing new shows on television and radio to encourage Welsh music, and breaking down the stereotype that Wales is simply full of choirs that only perform when there is a rugby game being played.

Clearly, Welsh music has an important role in the culture-history of our nation. It binds us together in chapel, unites us as one in sporting events, and allows us to enjoy pop, rock and modern music genres with friends. Not many countries can boast that about their music.

 

“Guitar legends of the Sahara”

My first thought is that the O2 Academy is a boring venue for a band with a sound as warm and story as unique as Tinariwen. These men are guitar legends of the Sahara and former members of Muammar al-Gadaffi’s guerrilla training camps. They are, as NPR have dubbed them, “music’s true rebels”. An O2 Academy is the opposite of rebellious.

This room is usually stifling hot. Tonight, a seriously strong air-conditioning blast suddenly hits halfway through Tinariwen’s set. My friend suggests it’s the desert wind. Next, he says, there’ll be a sand storm.

For Tinariwen (itself a Tamasheq word meaning ‘deserts’) are very much at home in the sand dunes of the Sahara. These musicians grew up as part of the Tuareg rebel community, in nomad camps in the far north-east of Mali, and later in refugee camps in Algeria. Witness to rebel movements and violent attacks, the band was formed as a collective in the late 1970s. Founding member Ibrahim Ag Alhabib first made his own guitar with a tin can, a stick and bicycle brake wire. Now Tinariwen count Thom Yorke, Chris Martin and Brian Eno among their fans and have seven studio albums and a 2012 Grammy tucked under their belts.

The music they play has even been named ‘desert music’, but that doesn’t bear the brunt of it. Tinariwen are influenced by Algerian pop rai, classical Egyptian pop, and Moroccan protest songs, alongside western pop and rock artists, folk and the blues. During the early days of the collective’s existence, Tinariwen’s members got their hands on bootlegged copies of western albums including Led Zeppelin and Jimi Hendrix. It’s not hard to see how music became their driving force for a political resistance.

This insistence on music as their saviour is evident onstage. Tinariwen sing in their native Tamasheq language about ongoing troubles in Mali, a changing homeland and the beauty of the desert, and they wear traditional flowing robes and turban-veils. They dance with an otherworldly passion for what they are playing, their insistence on its danceable capabilities as encouraging as the audience who cheers back at them.

There is no need to translate Tinariwen’s incessant rhythmic groove. Layered guitar riffs take centre stage, the intricacy in the finger-picking marking these players out as seriously talented musicians. This guitar shredding works best when strung along at odds with the vocal lines, as the band’s call and response vocals resound in gloriously sustained harmony. There is a wonderful complexity to the texture, too, when the tindé drum is played at odds with Eyadou Ag Leche’s limber, and undeniably funky, bass, as it kicks along on tracks such as ‘Imdiwanin ahi Tifhamam’.

The set ends in ‘Chaghaybou’, from the 2013 album Emmaar, a perfect example of the rhythmic restlessness with which Tinariwen play. The track’s final lyrical image is of Chaghaybou, the song’s addressee, being taught the Tifinagh alphabet by his mother in the sand. “In the sand”—the crucial environmental detail wholeheartedly missing from this gig which is otherwise so full of the sincerity, graciousness and musical finesse Tinariwen take with them no matter how far from the Sahara they wander.

Taking up Tupac’s “thug poet” mantle

0

In a genre so fixated on authenticity—on being ‘real’—as hip-hop, leaps in stylistic or personal development can seem forced, a selling out for mass appeal or street credibility. Freddie Gibbs however, has pulled off the feat of a major artistic rebirth with the release of his eagerly anticipated new project You Only Live 2wice. The Renaissance inspired album art represents this metamorphosis, with a robed Gibbs hovering serenely in the air, seemingly ascending above a foreground depicting emblems of the grim realities of his former life.

This transformation was occasioned by two life-altering events. Shortly after the release of Piñata, his ground-breaking collaboration with Madlib, Gibbs was targeted outside a record signing event in New York by two gunmen who narrowly missed him, instead injuring members of his entourage.

Two years later, after enjoying international acclaim for the first time in his long and troubled career, Gibbs was extradited from France to Austria on sexual assault charges, spending months in jail before being acquitted on all counts. Facing the prospect of ten years in prison in a foreign country for a crime he did not commit, Gibbs underwent what he calls a ‘conversion’ and vowed to turn his back on his old life—the drugs, fickle friends and, if necessary, his music itself.

In the moving outro to the album, Gibbs describes the anxiety of being surrounded by an unfamiliar language, hoping only for a book he could understand. He began furiously writing the project inside the cell he shared with a swastika-tattooed inmate, as a means of passing the time and of distracting himself from the thought that that he might not see his young daughter grow up.

Frustration and regret have always been elements of Gibbs’ work, apparent in the menacing yet vulnerable tone of his delivery as much as in his lyrics. The feelings of remorse about his life as a drug dealer in Gary, Indiana, one of America’s most violent cities, has always been one of the more intriguing sides to his gritty street tales, but these occasional reflective moments come to the fore as a major theme of the new album.

On stand out track ‘Alexys’, co-produced by the seemingly omnipresent Kaytranada and BADBADNOTGOOD, Gibbs remembers his early exposure to drugs “I first taste cocaine in tenth grade” and reflects on the ultimately empty nature of his former work: “Feds lookin’ because I peddled pain to these poor folks / The realest n****s that I know ain’t never sold dope”.

On ‘Crushed Glass’ Gibbs is at his angriest and most determined, fusing his desire for personal transformation—“The future started yesterday / every minute feeling different, I am not the same”—with bitter reflections on the injustices he and his people have suffered: “‘Round the world, jail system like a slave trade / Got the recipe for dope, my reparations paid”. As always, Gibbs is able to propel a track singlehandedly with the force of his visceral imagery. Even when the production and lyrical content tail off towards the end of the tape, his sheer versatility keeps the listener rapt with an urgency few can match. With his last few projects, Gibbs has solidified his status as the true successor to his idol Tupac’s mantle of the ‘thug poet’. If the emphasis up until now has been on the first part of that title, one hopes that his newfound direction will allow him to more fully explore his poetry.