Thursday 3rd July 2025
Blog Page 88

The definitive Oxford smoothie review

0

With summer comes smoothie weather, and Oxford offers a plethora of fruity delights. Coming from a place where a small smoothie is twice the price of the most expensive one here, being able to get something cold and fruity from a cafe on a hot day makes even the worst day of exam revision better. Take this article as an ode to the refreshing smoothie, and some of my favourite places to get them. There are definitely more smoothie places that remain unreviewed – go searching around on a hot day, and who knows, maybe you’ll find the smoothie of your dreams. 

Taylor’s, 8/10

I’ve don’t think I’ve had a smoothie at Taylor’s since MT22 and don’t remember whether I liked the ones I had, but the Deputy Editor for Food, Gracie (shoutout), loves their passionfruit smoothie because it has no banana in it; the Tesco smoothies (which I feel look a little too powdery to seem appetising), a former love of hers, do contain banana. Important information for those no longer able to eat banana. The options at Taylor’s are certainly decent, and the price is not outrageous for a decent smoothie. 

Joe and the Juice, 5/10

Joe and the Juice is a throwback to my NYC smoothie era. It certainly sells smoothies, but it is extremely expensive and not worth the price. Go somewhere else instead. Who goes to Westgate for a smoothie anyway?

Oxford Brunch Bar, 6/10

I had a smoothie here at my very first brunch, and it was fine. Just a normal berry smoothie. A bit too much blueberry to strawberry, and £4.90 really is a lot for a small mug of smoothie. You may as well get two bags of frozen fruit and blend it yourself for the same price.

Art Cafe, 6/10

Art Cafe doesn’t have bad smoothies; their mango, passion fruit, and banana smoothie taste pretty good. I’ve also heard good things about their kale smoothie, though I’ve never had it. But note: they are expensive, at £5.95. For a similar price, you could buy their açaí bowl instead – a decent portion size, and it’ll actually fill you up!

Moo-Moo’s, 9/10

Moo-Moo’s is an essential stop when getting food in the Covered Market. Covered with filled-up loyalty cards and packed to the brim, you have the option to make a smoothie with quite literally anything you’d like. I like the Annabelle special (just over £4 for a large) with apple juice and mango, but have somehow only ever requested the watermelon smoothie when they’re sold out – try it if you can! 

Cafe Crème, 10/10

I love Cafe Crème. It is seriously the best place for smoothies in Oxford. They have a mango pear smoothie (my fave), an açaí berry smoothie, and even their strawberry banana smoothie doesn’t feel too bad. Their green and fruity smoothies (combined with a good price, just £3 with a student discount) pairs amazingly with a cheap sandwich at lunchtime. And Cafe Crème has loyalty cards – I’ve filled up at least two. I can think of nothing wrong with this place, except that they have not yet given me a lifetime supply of free smoothies (but there’s always time).

Honourable mentions: college cafes

St Anne’s Coffee Shop, 8/10. I recently visited to try the mango banana smoothie. For less than £2, I got a decently sized drink, refreshing at a sip and with a taste that was not too sweet, but not too sour. Although I could still taste chunks of banana, it wasn’t an issue for me. My thoughts? Underrated – and good for my chronic smoothie addiction.

Kendrew Cafe, St John’s College, 7.5/10. I’ve only been a few times, but I always enjoy the coconut and mint smoothie. Their berry smoothies are nice and sweet, but the portion sizes are too small for £2.35. Still, as a college cafe, it’s much cheaper than the scary outside world (and you get a decent drink)!

Thames Water pay nearly £5 million for sewage clean up in Oxfordshire this year

0

Thames Water, the UK’s largest waste and wastewater company, has revealed that they have spent £4.7 million in Oxfordshire to clean up sewage overflows in the past financial year. In response to an Environmental Information Regulations request submitted by the Liberal Democrats, the organisation also revealed that across its network, the total cost of clean up came up to £30 million. 

The Cassington and Witney sewage treatment works located upstream of Port Meadow have been the site of clean-up efforts by the company. Expenditure is focused on the use of tankers which clean spills caused by burst pipes, broken pumps, and overwhelmed sewage systems. A spokesperson from Thames Water said: “while all discharges are unacceptable, the sewage system was historically designed in this way, to relieve pressure and prevent overflow into people’s homes.”

Concerns about wastewater treatment and discharge have led to persistent criticisms of Thames Water’s management approach. Studies by the Oxford Rivers Improvement Campaign in 2022, found that 46 of the 90 sewage treatment works across the Upper Thames lacked the appropriate capacity, with over 85 billion litres of discharge being pumped into the river since 2020. Residents have suffered from these infrastructural issues, with those living in Lower Radley experiencing blocked drains for the past three years which overflow with sewage during heavy rains.

Layla Moran, parliamentary candidate for Oxford West and Abingdon commented: “This staggering figure shows just how misguided Thames Water’s investment strategy is… they are leaving sewage to overflow and then spending millions of pounds to clean up their own mess.”

Overflow and sewage discharge has also had significant impacts on recreation areas and facilities used by students. In January 2022, 350 protesters gathered in Port Meadow to call for an end to Thames Water’s dumping of sewage in local rivers and waterways. The #EndSewagePollution campaigns launched by these organisers led to an application by the City Council to give Oxford designated bathing water status.

The application was approved in April 2022 on the condition that its water quality is considered “fit to swim in” within five years. At this time, levels of E. coli in the waters were found by Professor Peter Hammond, former Professor of Computational Biology at UCL, to be at twice the healthy limit, primarily due to sewage discharge and overflow. In both 2022 and 2023, the area has been classified as having “poor” water quality in government reports

Thames Waters’ have pledged to increase investment in order to improve their facilities. From 2020 to 2025, they committed £1.25 billion to maintaining and improving operational sites, including the rivers across the Thames Valley in Oxfordshire, promising £15 million in upgrades to the Witney facility and aiming for a 50% reduction of Thames Valley discharges by 2030. 

St Antony’s GCR suspends alumni privileges of Columbia University President

0

The Graduate Common Room (GCR) of Oxford University’s St Antony’s College voted to suspend the alumni privileges of Dame Baroness Minouche Shafik, the current Columbia University president who called the police on her students. Shafik earned a DPhil at St Antony’s, an all-graduate college of Oxford. 

The motion notes that Shafik’s reactions to Columbia students’ protests has been “widely criticised as appalling.” One of its citations includes a video where “the NYPD can be seen throwing the body of a student down a flight of stone steps.” The police made over 200 arrests in Columbia University.

St Antony’s GCR motion states: “Minouche Shafik’s handling of the student protests is contrary to the values of free speech, human rights, and ethical leadership that our University upholds. Our college community has a responsibility to take a stand against actions by alumni that undermine these fundamental principles.”

The motion, passed on May 30th, will formally request that St Antony’s College suspend the alumni privileges of Shafik, which includes a yearly free high table dinner, and forbid her from visiting college premises, speaking at college events, and attending alumni events.

A spokesperson of St Antony’s College told Cherwell that the motion will be discussed in the Governing Body, so the College cannot comment on it at this moment. The spokesperson said: “At present, our main concern is with the welfare of our students, both those who are engaged in protest and those who are not, particularly those who are immersed in their academic work at the end of the year.”

Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine told Cherwell: “We stand in solidarity with the students at Oxford and across the globe calling for divestment from genocide and apartheid, and we welcome the motion to suspend the alumni privileges of the Baroness [Shafik].”

“Even prior to her brutal treatment of peaceful protestors, she had threatened academic freedom to an unprecedented degree, opting to fire professors for speaking about settler-colonialism in Palestine and objective history but overlook prolonged, pervasive stalking and harassment by Zionist professors. Someone who chooses to invest in the destruction of every University in Gaza, as well as import violence and authoritarianism onto her own campus, has absolutely no place in academia.”

Israr Khan wins Oxford Union presidency

0

Israr Khan has been elected Oxford Union President for Hilary Term 2025 with 617 first preferences against opponent Izzy Horrocks-Taylor’s 393 first preferences. The margin is significantly wider than in the Union’s previous two elections, when the top two candidates only differ by a handful of votes. 

Rachel Haddad Moskalenko, Moosa Harraj, and Siddhant Nagrath won the elections for Librarian, Treasurer, and Secretary respectively.

The Union faced significant controversy this week after the disqualification of previous President-elect Ebrahim Osman-Mowafy caused allegations against the Union’s tribunal process for disproportionally “targeting diverse representatives.”

Khan’s campaign focused on combating “institutional racism” within the Union, while Horrocks-Taylor’s campaign emphasised “female representation on committees and in our term cards.”

Subsequently, three of the Union’s committees – the Standing Committee, Secretary’s Committee, and Consultative Committee – all declared the Oxford Union “institutionally racist”. During Thursday’s debate, 17 Union Committee members threatened to resign as part of a protest in favour of Osman-Mowafy’s reinstatement. 

Two of the Union’s last three president-elects were ultimately disqualified before assuming office. In the third election, the candidate, Hannah Edwards, ran unopposed.

Following his victory, Khan told Cherwell: “I am incredibly grateful to the members of the Oxford Union for placing their trust in me by electing me as President and to my team for believing in me. This election was crucial, especially during such challenging times. There is a significant amount of work ahead, and I am committed to leading the Union on a more inclusive path and restoring its relevance. Thank you for your support, and together, we will make a meaningful difference.”

Candidates elected to the Standing Committee, in order of most votes to least, are: Anya Trofimova, Sarah Rana, Hamza Hussain, George Abaraonye, Ben Murphy, and Raza Nazar. Candidates elected to the Secretary’s Committee are: Tobe Onyia, Veer Sangha, Akshay Nagpal, Boldi Paladi-Kovacs, Zarin Fariha, Michael Leslie, Katherine Yang, Makkunda Sharma, Benjamin Masters, Sophia Giblett, and Jennifer Yang.

This term’s election saw 1187 valid votes cast, a small increase from last election, which saw 1158 cast. It continues a trend of increasing turnout: 987 were cast in MT23 and 590 in TT23. 

Israr Khan will be the third Pakistani President of the Oxford Union and the first to come from the Balochostin province. He was congratulated on his election win by Pakistani Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, on X. Sharif said: “I join the people of Pakistan in extending heartiest congratulations to Israr Khan for being elected President of Oxford Union for Hiliary Term 2025… You have made the entire nation proud!” In response, Khan expressed his gratitude for the “overwhelming support and kind words” and assured that he “will make sure to use this platform for good.” 

The Oxford Imps Game Show (Live) review: ‘If improv is risky, here you’re in safe hands’

Bad improv makes me nervous. Nervous that the performer will drop the ball, lose their train of thought, or say something outright unfunny. And the Imps (Oxford’s “premiere improvised comedy group”) certainly set the stakes high, incorporating a huge amount of variables and audience participation into their game show format, itself a tribute to the excitement of the bygone era of The Generation Game and Wheel of Fortune. Luckily, they delivered a hilarious and at times wacky show that kept the audience engaged throughout. 

The show featured a contest between two audience members chosen at random to win a ‘bag of favours’ to which each audience member had contributed at the door. Favours included everything from baking tips to mediocre sex, so there was a lot to play for. The two contestants (one of whom was my friend who was shattered from cycling 60 kilometres earlier in the day) were subjected to a range of comedic tasks, including pretending to be a bin, limboing under an invisible bar, and guessing the flavours of soups that had been mixed together. Too bad that the final challenge – a spin on the wheel of fortune – yielded the wrong result and so the bag of favours (surreally and inexplicably) had to be destroyed by a blender in the show’s closing action. 

The two hosts (Billy Morton and Fuaad Coovadia) manage to capture something of the loud, moustachioed, 70s television man – from asking contestants banal opening questions to making wry remarks on their progress through the show. The improvised, melodramatic disagreement between the two in the show’s ‘ad break’ was especially amusing and gave the show something of an underlying narrative. They were supported by Lili Herbert, who provides ironic musical backing (and cutting sarcastic asides), contributing contestants’ challenges of her own and improvising songs from a title of their choosing. Theo Breakspear’s lighting and sound invite the audience to immerse themselves in the atmosphere of the game show studio in all its emphatic, overcooked glory. 

But the stars of the show are the Imps who represent each contestant in a serious of ridiculous ‘minigames’. Sol Woodroffe, Leonard Ho, Basakran Sripathmanathan, and Sali Adams try to outdo each other in their level of sheer ad-lib silliness and quick-thinking bravado. They variously create diss tracks of the contestants (some of which managed to actually rhyme), try to woo a retired civil servant picked from the audience, and also create pun-filled impromptu adverts for another audience member’s marketing business. There is so much that can go wrong – and they’re not always left with a lot to work with – and so the ability to consistently make people laugh on the spot is remarkable. The cast’s sense of professionalism – a fine line of managing the chaos and unpredictability – testifies to the high standards they keep. If improv is risky, here you’re in safe hands.

Screening the Regency: An exploration of historical costume design

The recent release of the first part of hit Netflix show Bridgerton’s third season has once again sparked discussion about its costuming and adherence (or lack thereof) to actual Regency trends. The extravagant dresses and accessories featured in the show are undoubtedly visually appealing, however, they are often not historically accurate. While the costumes are not the most era-appropriate, many argue that the show is a fantasy loosely based on history, rather than a faithful retelling, and that the costumes are meant to appeal to modern tastes. The discourse around Bridgerton’s fashion more broadly reflects how Regency fashion is often misrepresented on screen for narrative or aesthetic reasons. 

The Regency era most often refers to the time in British history between the late 1700s and the early 1800s. What Bridgerton gets right about fashion in this era is the silhouettes. The empire waistline was the predominant style, and this is reflected on the screen. The cropped jackets that have become synonymous with Kate Sharma’ style are also surprisingly historically accurate. These jackets are known as a Spencer and were adapted from and inspired by the menswear at the time. 

Despite the accuracy in terms of silhouette, many crucial items are missing from the wardrobe of the Bridgerton ton. One of these is the chemisette, which was used to give coverage to the front and neckline of dresses. These garments would give the appearance of a shirt or blouse underneath a dress without adding unnecessary bulk. The necklines in Bridgerton would not adhere to the modesty norms of the Regency era. Apart from being more in line with modern fashion, these necklines serve a narrative purpose. This is most evident in the most recent reason. The main character of season three, Penelope Featherington, is sidelined in seasons one and two. In season three, she reinvents herself in order to move more into the spotlight of society. One major way she does this is through her wardrobe. An obvious change that the costuming department made was to the fit of her dresses around the waist and neckline. The more tailored fit in season three is noticeable partly due to the lack of additional garments obstructing the neckline. The better tailoring of Penelope’s dresses in season three makes her look more put together, thus contributing to her narrative arc for the season. 

Another important Regency accessory missing from the show is the bonnet. This is the most often neglected item of clothing in on screen representations of the Regency era, even though it was such a wardrobe staple at the time. However, this makes sense for media targeted to modern audiences. Nicely styled, glossy hair is a marker of beauty in contemporary society, and hair is better captured on camera when not obstructed by anything. While the decision to not include bonnets in the show’s costuming is understandable, it is a shame as they are so paramount to Regency fashion and can be used to make outfits complete. 

The colours used in the show are also far from historically accurate. Bright colours were not staples of the Regency era, yet multiple characters on the show, like the entire Featherington family, are defined by the flashy colours they wear. This too, seems like an intentional storytelling technique, rather than an oversight. The Featheringtons wear extravagant hues due to their desire to be noticed, and also as a way to distract from their poor financial standing. Each family in Bridgerton has their own colour scheme reflective of their personality, and this subtle symbolism would not be possible if all of the costumes used colours faithful to the Regency era. 

Fictional media set in Regency England does not always need to be truly faithful to historical fashion because the time period and its silhouette is so recognisable that it can be immediately identified when seen on screen. This gives shows like Bridgerton room to be creative in the way they use their costuming for symbolism and propagating the plot, which has been very clearly demonstrated in the latest season of the Netflix show. 

St Anne’s College alumni condemn ‘one-sided’ pro-Palestine JCR motion

0

Over 60 St Anne’s College alumni have signed a letter in opposition to the recent passing of a JCR motion which condemned “the ongoing genocide within Palestine being carried out by the Israeli government,” expressed support for the Oxford Action for Palestine (OA4P) encampment, and demanded that Oxford University and the College make “progress towards full divestment” from companies and institutions with ties to Israel.

The letter criticised the St Anne’s JCR motion for “the absence of any condemnation of Hamas,” claiming that it was “one-sided” in nature and that it did “little more than inflame the already binary views that are so entrenched…at a time when antisemitism and discrimination against Israeli and Jewish students and staff is rife across the University.”

In addition, the alumni called on the College to release a “public statement highlighting that this motion reflects the view of the voting members of the JCR only and does not reflect the view of the College or alumni… college members hold a range of views and that Israeli and Jewish students are welcome at St Anne’s.”

Speaking to the Jewish Chronicle, the Principal of St Anne’s, Helen King, said: “It is neither possible nor desirable for the College to seek to directly control this [JCR motion]… The position of St Anne’s governing body is that it does not vote on and will not debate motions that take a position on political or world events.”

King added: “We also have to ensure that the academic freedom and principles of freedom of speech, which are so core to what a university is, are preserved.

“I am meeting with and listening to individual members of the College who are Jewish… I want to understand any concerns they have, offer support, and assure them that the College is committed to being an inclusive community.”

St Anne’s College was contacted for comment.

Queen’s College Eaglets dining society to return amidst backlash

0

A formerly disbanded Queen’s College dining society is set to return amidst opposition from the student body. The Eaglets, dissolved in 2019, previously operated as an all-male institution and is planned to return as a mixed-gender society with support from the Dean of Queen’s College. 

The Queen’s JCR and Women’s Society have each expressed concerns that the Society will be exclusionary, and have cited the alleged high cost of over £80 per dinner and lack of name change from the original society as evidence of this. The Eaglets was previously dissolved after refusing to write a constitution, and had been condemned by the JCR for its exclusionary nature. 

The Dean of Queen’s College, Richard Nickerson, who supports the resurgence of the society, told Cherwell: “In the past Eaglets’ membership was inclusive, geographically, ethnically, and in terms of social background and sexual orientation.” In the new constitution of the Eaglets, which Cherwell has not seen, Nickerson has introduced “a mechanism for becoming a member which allowed anyone to join”. The society has become mixed-gender, as well as removing the tradition that members attended public schools.

Concerns around the all-male history of the Society have been been expressed by the Women*’s Society. In a statement, the Women*’s Society has said: “the decision not to change the name in itself signifies to us there has been no shift in its core values or principles, regardless of what its constitution says.” The plan to invite back old members, who were part of the exclusive society, has also caused concern. 

The JCR passed a motion supporting the Women*’s Society statement, with 27 for, 5 against, 1 abstaining. The statement included: “Women*Soc believes that Eaglets will promote a culture of exclusivity. It marks a renewed investment in a historically discriminative society, whilst maintaining discrimination through financially structured elitism. This rejects not only the college’s ethos of inclusivity, but also the university’s commitment ‘to fostering an inclusive culture which promotes equality, values diversity and maintains a working, learning and social environment in which the rights and dignity of all its staff and students are respected’.”

The new iteration of the Society has repeatedly assured the JCR that it is inclusive to all members of college. The current JCR President told Cherwell that “membership to the Eaglets is open to all current members of College.”

Some students have expressed concern that the alleged price of dinners, between £80 and £100, is purposeful to exclude state-educated members of the College. These figures have been denied by the JCR President. The JCR Socio-Economic Representative has commented that the return of the society would “[deter] working class people from applying.” 

In response, the Dean has expressed that the society is based around dining for “those with a keen interest in fine food.” He has told Cherwell: “The club is for those who wish to devote part of their disposable income to this, rather than, say, an evening drinking and clubbing, which might cost a similar amount.” 

The revival comes on the heels of a growing distaste for drinking and dining societies. Oxford University Conservative Association banned Bullingdon members from holding any offices, in an effort to move towards “a more open, welcoming, and tolerant environment for all.” Multiple colleges, including Queen’s, have banned exclusionary societies hosting events on site during term-time, although SCR members have been able to bypass some rules. 

Lack of transparency: Oxford’s known and unknown donors

What’s in a name?

Today, the names Saïd, Blavatnik, and Rothermere are as prominent in the landscape of Oxford’s institutions as the long-standing names of Rhodes, Ashmole, and Radcliffe, among many others. Until 2022, the Sackler name, now marked by its association with the opioid epidemic, graced the titles of six different institutions, posts, and funds related to the University of Oxford. 

In parallel, but with a much older legacy, the former Codrington Library of All Souls was also renamed in 2020 after the College was forced to reckon with the history of slavery tied to that donor and the funds endowed to them in 1710. Both new and old, these often controversial names are emblazoned across the University’s most important institutions as rewards for the largesse of donors. They continue to stand as a testament to the University’s chronic reliance on external funding to finance its operations and maintain its status as a world-leading university. 

When it comes to external funding, the University has had perennial issues with transparency. All major donations are accepted after an opaque, University-led process of due diligence; some donations – including very large ones – remain anonymous to the public altogether. 

The University assures that “all significant new funders or new gifts or grants from existing funders are reviewed by the Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding (CRDRF).” The CRDRF conducts due diligence to review external funding and donations. The University describes it as a “robust, independent system taking legal, ethical and reputational issues into consideration before gifts are accepted.” Yet the review process isn’t transparent – and approximately 700 entities including private companies are on a ‘Pre-Approved list’ to bypass it altogether. 

The University has been faced with severe scrutiny towards its external funding arrangements, which have recently culminated in repeated calls for greater transparency from academics and members of the student body. 

Scandals, investigations, and reputation laundering.

Since 2022, the University has featured prominently in several investigations conducted by independent outlet, openDemocracy, into sources of external funds and donations received by UK higher education institutions. In March of that year, it reported that sanctioned Russian oligarch Vladimir Potanin “had donated $150,000 to an Oxford University fellowship scheme named in his honour” as a response to a Cherwell report on the oligarch’s £3m endowment for an Earth Sciences fund in the University.

Speaking with Cherwell, Jenna Corderoy, a lead reporter on openDemocracy’s investigations team, said: “I really do think it’s vital and ethical that universities, because they wield such great influence, tell students and the public how they are funded.”

Other investigations have shed light on the extent of fossil fuel donations to the University: “Oxford University also regularly consults fossil fuel companies about FOI requests, having taken between £10.8m and £20m in funding from them since 2016/17.” As well as defence contractors: “Oxford University told openDemocracy that Rolls-Royce gave over £17.5m but said it could provide no further details since it would reveal confidential information.” Finally, in a large-scale investigation into anonymous donations, it found that: “Oxford University alone accepted more than £106m in anonymous donations – the highest amount of any Russell Group university.”

In late 2023, Cherwell investigated the Oxford Nizami Ganjavi Centre, an institution named after a thirteenth century poet and not the donor responsible for an anonymous gift of £10m to the University, and whose real identity still remains unknown. It was reported that Nargiz Pashayeva, sister-in-law of the current President of Azerbaijan sat on the board of the Nizami Ganjavi Centre and was also identified as a key facilitator for the creation of the Centre itself.

Crucially, it was also found that Pashayeva had been quoted saying she “would like to thank Mr. Iskandar Khalilov for his financial support of the Oxford Nizami Ganjavi Centre” in a 2017 article from the Azeri outlet Azernews. Cherwell’s further inquiries into Khalilov as the potential anonymous donor were inconclusive. An FOIA request to the University to disclose the name of the donor was rejected on the grounds of a “breach of data protection principles” and “prejudice to commercial interests.”

PpenDemocracy’s inquiries into the matter have been similarly frustrated; however, it claimed, “that the University is so insistent on keeping the donor out of public scrutiny that it is going to court to block a Freedom of Information request from openDemocracy.” In turn, the University responded that “openDemocracy had taken the Information commissioner to a tribunal after the Commission ruled for the University”.

Recently, Dr John Heathershaw, a Professor at the University of Exeter and a notably active proponent of transparency in university funding, told Cherwell: “in the Nizami Ganjavi case, Oxford claimed to the information officer that there was no risk to reputation laundering because the identity of the donor was kept secret.” Heathershaw is engaged in the research of the global phenomenon of ‘reputation laundering’ defined “as the intentional, minimising or obscuring of evidence of corruption and authoritarianism in a kleptocrat’s home country and rebranding kleptocrats as engaged global citizens.”

Heathershaw elaborated: “This suggests that the University fundamentally misunderstands the nature of reputation laundering and the character of a kleptocratic environment such as Azerbaijan.  It is typical in such a place for key businesspeople to act on behalf of the kleptocratic elite, as a nominee or third party, to launder their money and their reputations. Reputation laundering of the state and society is also a benefit to the elite.”

All roads lead to the CRDRF

Twenty-two years ago, a cash-for-places scandal rocked the University. A Sunday Times reporter, posing as a wealthy banker ready to make a £300,000 donation to Pembroke College, was told his son’s application would be looked upon “extremely favourably.” The Rev. John Platt, a senior fellow at the college, told the undercover reporter that his son would be given “a guaranteed entry,” adding, “Tutors understand. They see the bigger picture.”

The fallout was massive. Platt and another don swiftly resigned and the University opened an inquiry. Three months later, the Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding (CRDRF) was established. It aimed to ensure that all donations accepted by the University were ethical, legal, did not cause any conflicts of interest, and would not do “damage to the reputation of the collegiate University.”

The University describes the CRDRF as a “robust, independent system.” The Committee, made up of ten members appointed by Council, assesses all major donations (above £1m) as well as what an internal report characterises as “higher-risk” donations of any size.

In 2021/2022, the CRDRF declined 12% of potential donations. A CRDRF internal document Cherwell has accessed emphasises that the assessment of funding is “complex,” and much of the language employed in official documents is opaque.

Publicly available criteria against which the acceptance of funding is assessed includes guidance on donations related to illegal activity, the tobacco industry and fossil fuels. With regards to illegal activity, some considerations include that if “the University would be acquiring the proceeds of crime or be otherwise involved in money laundering activity” or “the University would be involved with terrorist financing activity”, funds must be rejected. In contrast, considerations about the “wider interests of the University” include whether funds will “otherwise do harm to the reputation of the university.”

An appendix of the CRDRF’s annual report refers to donors with a “tarnished” reputation, without further defining what exactly is meant by tarnished. They further stipulate: that they will consider donors with tarnished reputations where “the behaviour which led to the funder’s reputation being tarnished has clearly ceased.” 

In 2019, the University introduced a list exempting approximately 700 entities from review. All funding from these entities not over £5 million is accepted immediately. This includes a ‘Pre-Approved List’ of 493 entities described only as “entities with currently valid approvals” whose identity the University chooses not to share. When asked which entities were pre-approved, the University told Cherwell they would not disclose the names of companies on the list of companies and groups “on the grounds of commercial interest and confidentiality.” 

Also not subject to review are approximately 163 ‘spin-out companies’ (in which the University owns a stake), as well as 107 ‘Gold List’ entities – low-risk organisations including UK government departments and EU institutions.

A “significant minority” of major donors, which contributed about £75m between 2017 and 2022 to the University, wish to remain anonymous. For example, the name of the single donor who provided £10m to fund the Nizami Ganjavi Centre is not known. The University has sought to protect donors’ requests for anonymity, stating that “the public is able to debate the pros and cons of different sources of funding to universities without knowing the precise identity of each individual donor.” 

The University’s policies regarding funding have been criticised in the past. In communications with Cherwell, Professor Heathershaw described the CRDRF as “not accountable to the wider faculty, students, and alumni.” Previously, the CRDRF’s predecessor, the CRD, was criticised by Peter Oppenheimer, a former fellow at Christ Church, in response to Len Blavatnik’s donations to the University: “Oxford’s purported mechanism for verifying the ethical acceptability of money that it receives is clearly deficient, if it indeed works at all.”

Why is there no transparency?

Cherwell acquired a response from the University to a request for internal review on the disclosure of the identity of the donor of £10m to the Nizami Ganjavi centre from late 2022. 

It argues that: “the public interest in transparency has to be weighed against the public interest in maintaining the University’s ability to attract private donations, including from those who desire anonymity, which help to support its teaching, research and related activities, such as the provision of bursaries for poorer students. Anonymous donors make a significant minority of donations to the University’s fund-raising.” 

It continues to say that: “fund-raising is a competitive activity. The University is competing against not only other universities (both nationally and internationally) but also other charitable institutions involved in similar activities, such as research. Some of the University’s competitors are not subject to the FOIA or similar legislation.”

Clearly, the University plainly recognises that it has to depend on donations to survive and maintain its global relevance – and that dependence will only increase in the coming years. The University has stated that if it “were to be required to name an anonymous donor, it would deter those prospective donors who would prefer to remain anonymous.” In their view, transparency is the price to pay in exchange for the University’s continued growth.

Top 10 Summer Reads

0

Summer, Edith Wharton, 1917

I’m going to start with an obvious pick: Summer by Edith Wharton. I read this for the first time recently, in spring, when I was trying to manifest the onset of summer, and it was absolutely consuming to say the least. Set in the heady countryside of New England, this succinct novel sees seventeen-year-old Charity Royall unearth love and intense passion when the intellectual Lucius Harney descends upon her small home-town. Wharton received backlash for Summer’s unfeigned treatment of female sexuality and passion, but it is this that makes Charity so likeable, even in her moments of naivety. What sticks with me the most from this novel is its ending. Although not catastrophic, nor epic, nor devastating, Wharton’s quiet close to the novel opens up one of the most complex male characters I’ve ever come across. Filled with passion that is only matched by the hot, sticky, crowded festival scenes, this novel promises to ignite your summer reading.

‘An Easy Passage’ (poem), Julia Copus, 2010

Winner of The Forward Prize for best single poem in 2010, Julia Copus’ poem An Easy Passage is an intensely bright, over-exposed evocation of a childhood summer. The two girls featuring in the poem, find themselves perched on an external window ledge, which Copus parallels with their being also on the brink of teenagerhood, desperately wanting to be older and adorning their bodies in an effort to do so. Copus’ use of imagery is striking: ‘the blond / gravel somewhere beneath her’, ‘leaning in / to the warm flank of the house’, ‘the five neat shimmering-oyster-painted toenails of an outstretched foot’. This poem pulses with blistering heat and intense female friendship, that combine to create something akin to the feeling of blurred, dizzy childhood memories. 

Manhattan Beach, Jenniger Egan, 2017

Summer often gives us the free time to wallow in long, indulgent books, and Manhattan Beach by the Pulitzer-Prize-winning Jennifer Egan, is one of those. Manhattan Beach by definition is a historical novel set in 1930s New York and begins amongst the fallout of the Great Depression. Egan’s novel tracks Anna Kerrigan’s love and subsequent loss of her father, as well as the uncovering of his mysterious disappearance. The earlier parts of the novel, when Anna is only eleven, are sensitively written, often hiding things from Anna herself, but revealing them to the reader. The novel flashes forward in time to when Anna is nineteen, fatherless and trying to support her mother and disabled sister, eventually leaving her unpassionate job to become the Navy Yard’s first female diver, working on underwater repairs. What distinguishes Manhattan Beach is a rumbling backdrop of underground, salacious, half-kept secrets and crime. Clocking in at around 450 pages, this is definitely a book for anyone looking for well-written escapism post-exam season.

Tess of the d’Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy, 1891

I don’t think any summer reading list would be complete without Thomas Hardy, and his tales complex tales of countryfolk. Hardy is a bit of anomaly for me in that he is one of few male Victorian novelists that appears to understand and sympathise with women’s experience at the time (Also George Gissing, whose The Odd Women is the best feminist novel of the nineteenth century – Ed). Tess of the d’Urbervilles, for its eponymous countrywoman Tess Durbeyfield, is practically a disaster from start to finish. In being told that the surname Durbeyfield is a corruption of the aristocratic d’Urberville, Tess is sent by her father to claim their ‘rightful roots’. Tess encounters many people throughout the novel – Mrs d’Urberville, Alec d’Urberville, Angel Clare – all of whom eventually fail her. Characteristic of Hardy’s tragic realism, Tess for me is an intensely lonely book, as we see how time and again Tess must face her challenging circumstances alone. I associate this book with summer largely because of how much of the book takes outdoors, as well as its heavily agricultural setting and backdrop. Perhaps not the most light-hearted pick-me-up, but definitely an absorbing read with a fabulously gothic ending. 

Cider with Rosie, Laurie Lee, 1959

‘I was set down from the carrier’s cart at the age of three; and there with a sense of bewilderment and terror my life in the village began’, is how Laurie Lee starts his much-loved ode to the British countryside. Achieving a childhood perception of the abundant Cotswolds, Lee captures the end of the First World War, and the subsequently untroubled moment before the onset of the second world war. In the section Winter and Summer, the long days spent entirely outdoors, when the children gorge themselves on berries, is contrasted with the bitter cold of winter, when boys forage with tins of burning rags to keep their hands warm. The descriptions of the village’s coldest winter only make the summer scenes appear all the more lush and vivid. Although this can easily be characterised as a blissful novel, Lee includes moments of grief, such as the death of one of his sisters, and the illnesses that he also suffered, often bringing him close to death. 

The Country Girls trilogy, Edna O’Brien, 1960-1964

For this next pick, I asked my tutor Professor Rebecca Beasley for her own recommendation. What I loved about this recommendation was that James Joyces’ Ulysses still managed to get a sneaky mention. This is what Rebecca said: 

“My summer reading usually consists of big (I mean physically big), much-lauded books I’ve been meaning to read for years. They pretty much always turn out to be amazing and I kick myself for not having got to them earlier. Difficult to choose one recommendation, but I’ll go for Edna O’Brien’s The Country Girls trilogy, especially the first of the three. If you read Ulysses and wished there’d been more of Molly (or Milly) in it, this is for you.”

‘This is just to say’, William Carlos Williams, 1934 

I have eaten

the plums

that were in

the icebox

and which

you were probably

saving

for breakfast

Forgive me

they were delicious

so sweet

and so cold

Possibly William Carlos Williams’ most famous poem, ‘This is just to say’ makes it on to this list largely because of the sensory experience it elicits. The ‘so sweet / and so cold’ fruit prickles all over with refreshing coolness, and the prospect of having this chilled fruit for breakfast is something I can only associate with hot summer mornings. Even though this is a poem that asks for forgiveness, I think anyone could sympathise with the narrator here, since Williams makes the fruit appear irresistible, even with only a few, judicious words. 

Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier, 1938

This is possibly my favourite novel of all time, and so I’m going to take any chance I can to talk about it. But Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier isn’t on here simply because I adore it, but rather because of one specific description in the novel that has really stuck with me. The novel depicts a young and unnamed woman, who, after meeting and courting Maxim de Winter for only two weeks whilst on holiday, returns to his mansion, Manderley, in Cornwall to marry him. Throughout this book, the sinister past of Manderley is revealed with chilling control, and the narrator often finds respite from the suffocating atmosphere of the house in long walks to the sea. On many such walks, the narrator traverses a valley filled with azaleas which Du Maurier describes wonderfully: 

“There were no dark trees here, no tangled undergrowth, but on either side of the narrow path stood azaleas and rhododendrons, not blood-coloured like the giants in the drive, but salmon, white, and gold, things of beauty and of grace, drooping their lovely, delicate heads in the soft summer rain. 

“The air was full of their scent, sweet and heady, and it seemed to me as though their very essence had mingled with the running waters of the stream, and become one with the falling rain and the dank rich moss beneath our feet. There was no sound here but the tumbling of the little stream, and the quiet rain.”

The Death of the Heart, Elizabeth Bowen, 1938

Portia, the main character of The Death of the Heart by Elizabeth Bowen, is naturally and brilliantly awkward. Having travelled extensively as a child, Portia from the beginning of this novel is characteristically untethered, even when she moves in with her half-brother, after the death of her mother. What strikes me as summery about The Death of the Heart is mostly the section of the novel in which Portia is effectively banished to the seaside. Not only does this mark another geographical move for Portia, but it also marks the moment at which her first attempts at love completely unravel. Even though this novel is set in the 30s, I don’t think I’ve ever read something that reminds me more of being sixteen. 

A Room with a View, E. M. Forster, 1908

To round up this list, I’m picking another classic summer read: A Room with a View by E. M. Forster. The novel opens in Florence where Lucy and her chaperone Charlotte are dismaying over the lack of a view that they have in their rooms at the Pensione Bertolini. This starts an acquaintance with another guest, Mr. Emerson, and his brooding, distant son, George. The romance and beauty of the Italian city is never far away from the background of this novel. Plot-wise, not a great deal actually happens in A Room with a View, but I think this lends itself to the simmering tensions that frequent the character relations. My favourite part of this novel by far is the tryst that happens in a swathe of violets: 

‘She did not answer. From her feet the ground sloped sharply into view, and violets ran down in rivulets and streams and cataracts, irrigating the hillside with blue, eddying round the tree stems collecting into pools in the hollows, covering the grass with spots of azure foam. But never again were they in such profusion; this terrace was the well-head, the primal source whence beauty gushed out to water the earth.’