Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1004

Details withheld from OULC antisemitism report

0

BARONESS ROYALL’S INQUIRY into the alleged antisemitism in the Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) found no evidence of “institutional antisemitism”, leading instead to a series of recommendations being made to the party as a whole.

The reports were commissioned by Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) and will be published in their entirety in the Chakrabarti report before the summer.

Although Baroness Royall wrote that she does “not believe that there is institutional antisemitism within OULC” she did however report individual incidents and other cases related to cultural issues in the club. These she says, “Must be addressed to ensure a safe space for all Labour students to debate and campaign” as its main consequence is that “some Jews do not feel welcome.”

Baroness Royall also noted in the summary of the reports that in one instance a case of “serious false allegations of antisemitism” was reported to the police.

The details of these incidents are yet to be made available, as only an executive summary and the recommendations were published on the Party’s website. Regarding this, Jeremy Newmark tweeted that he was “frustrated” the content of the report had been “suppressed” by Labour’s NEC, though this fact remains unconfirmed.

According to Baroness Royall, an effective response to these cultural problems would involve training sessions being organised to enable all new officers of Labour Clubs to fight against antisemitism within their circle. The report also encourages OULC to establish a  clear system of reporting for incidents of anti-semitism and racism more generally.

“I’m glad that Baroness Royall with me that OULC has a cultural problem”.

Alex Chalmers

Increased support and better communication at all levels in the Party are made the central target points of the Baroness’ recommendations struggled with allegations of anti-against antisemitism and racism in general. Royall adds that this system of reporting should include the ability to make an appeal directly to the Labour Party NEC.

The exclusion of students and other supporters from membership of the Party as punishment for being found guilty of antisemitism is, however, not perceived as an appropriate measure by the report and no such decisions have been made following the investigations.

The reports presented to the NEC stated that considering antisemitism in OULC inevitably leads to the same considerations regarding the entire Party, which has recently struggled with allegations of anti-semitism against prominent members. “No form of antisemitism or racism is acceptable, including being used as a factional political tool,” Baroness Royall concludes in the executive summary.

In its response to the report, OULC qualified antisemitism as “abhorrent, repugnant and contrary to the values we as a Club hold dear.

“The Oxford University Labour Club condemns any prejudice, intolerance and discrimination of any form and we take these allegations with the utmost seriousness,” said new co-chairs David Parton and Eleanor Ormsby. “We look forward to collaborating with her and the national Labour Party in moving forward from these events.”

The statement from the OULC Co-Chairs continues, “We will enthusiastically work with all national Labour Party officers to deal with all the complaints made against the Club. We will move to affiliate to the Jewish Labour Movement as a gesture of our solidarity with Jewish people and vigorously support the eight point plan to eradicate anti-Semitism within the Labour Party.”

Concerns about antisemitism within the Club were initially raised following the resignation of OULC former co-Chair Alex Chalmers, who claimed that many members and Oxford students in general had “some kind of problem with Jews”. The Party later found itself in controversy over allegations of antisemitism from Labour MPs.

Chalmers told Cherwell, “I’m glad that Baroness Royall agrees with me that OULC has a cultural problem that makes the club unsafe for a number of Jewish students, although I am disappointed that the report has not been published in full.

“I hope that the publication in due course of the party’s wider inquiry into antisemitism will give a fuller into antisemitism will give a fuller picture and that robust action is taken  against any individuals found to have picture and that robust action is taken against any individuals found to have been involved in antisemitic incidents.”

Christ Church breaks sanitation regulation by failing to provide bins

0

Christ Church is facing student anger over the lack of suitable and legal sanitary bins in public facilities. The College has promised the proper bins will be installed by next term, but some within the JCR remain wary.

While many of the individual accommodation staircases have the correct bins, some public facilities like the library lack them, and according to a Christ Church student, “Students have gone out of college grounds to use appropriate facilities whilst menstruating.”

The College confirmed it has bins in place but a contract had been drawn up for increased provisions by the start of next term.

Over the last year, students have been pushing the college to purchase the bins for feminine hygiene products as required under the Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations 1991. These are required as the potential hazard of contracting diseases through blood, such as HIV, that comes with handling this waste if it isn’t in proper containers.

An anonymous member of college pointed out the college is possibly endangering not only its students but its employees as well. “Scouts are having to clean up hazardous waste which in theory could lead to the contraction of a serious blood disease.”

“Unfortunately, a cost could not immediately be negotiated with the company supplying our bins, but these have been secured for the new academic year.”

Luke Cave

Some students have also expressed concern at the perceived lack of sympathy shown by JCR president Luke Cave. He denies this claim and told Cherwell, “Since this was brought to my attention earlier this year, we have been in discussions with college to implement professional sanitary bins in all of our shared toilets – following proper hazardous waste disposal protocols. Unfortunately, a cost could not immediately be negotiated with the external company already supplying some of our bins, but these have been secured for the new academic year.”

This concession follows a series of attempts by the student body to push the college to provide the proper equipment. The JCR threatened legal action when it almost unanimously voted to condemn the college for their “grievous neglect”.

The student claims the college was asked if the bins would be installed over Easter Vacation, but was told the House Manager and Steward were busy organising several conferences, and later that budgetary issues stood in the way.

“It’s obvious Christ Church has a long way to go in providing for its students”, the anonymous Christ Church commenter said. “The clear lack of effort and provision by Christ Church proves its growing negligence in terms of its students’ needs.

Patten scrutinised for comment on quotas

1

Lord Patten, Chancellor of Oxford University, has criticised the idea of imposing quotas on the admission of students, including BME students and those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. He stated that any plan to introduce minimum numbers of students from diverse backgrounds would lower academic standards.

Lord Patten made these comments following a Government proposal that would require all universities to publish data about the ethnicity, gender and socio-economic background of their students. This has been described by Jo Johnson, the minister for universities, as a “transparency revolution”.

In response, members of Merton JCR, noting that only 13 per cent of students identify as BME, have proposed a motion to denounce the Chancellor’s comment and demand an apology.

The motion called Patten’s comments “reprehensible insofar as they rely on the assumption that deliberately increasing the proportion of BME students at Oxford via quotas would entail a lowering standards, since it is clear that many highly capable students are turned away from Oxford every year, and that BME students are disproportionately rejected.”

Ministers are also looking to improve transparency in other areas, including forcing universities to publish information about graduate employment and the number of contact hours for each of the courses they offer.

In addition, the Queen’s speech to education given on Thursday, announced a bill making it easier for new universities to open. The bill also reforms funding to link it to the quality of teaching. Funding had previously been linked to the number of students.

The increase in transparency has been cautiously welcomed by some students. Nermeen Hilton, a Balliol student, said, “I think that an increase in transparency in the higher education system would have a positive impact because it could discourage institutional prejudice. Having more information about the course and job prospects after graduation will definitely help people make better decisions about where they apply to.

“However,” he continued, “the problem with universities publishing admissions data is it may lead to them trying to create the right statistics, rather than letting the best candidates in or actually addressing the underlying issues.”

“Having more information about the course and job prospects will help people make better decisions”

Nermeen Hilton

Despite Lord Patten’s opposition to quotas, Oxford University has defended its own record on transparency. “Oxford has published detailed information on our access and admissions performance for two decades, and would welcome similar transparency across higher education,” a spokesperson told Cherwell.

“We continue to make strong and sustained progress on access: For entry in 2016, the proportion of offers going to UK state school candidates rose to more than 59 per cent,” the University said. “The latest figures also show the University exceeding, meeting or making significant progress towards all four of its ambitious OFFA Access Agreement targets, including student numbers from schools with historically limited progression to Oxford, and students from neighbourhoods with low participation in higher education.”

Lord Patten’s statement is the latest in a series of controversial statements made by the Chancellor, most recently in an article for Project Syndicate in which he claimed that universities in China and Hong Kong are facing threats from the government to free speech and their autonomy.

Former OULC co-Chair kicked out of Labour

0

Oxford NUS delegate and former OULC co-Chair David Klemperer has been excluded from the Labour Party.

In an email chain seen by Cherwell, the Labour Party Compliance Officer describes the Notice of Poll in Oxford showing “a David Klemperer having nominated a LD [Liberal Democrat candidate] in Carfax ward” in the recent City Council elections.

The candidate nominated by Klemperer was Harry Samuels, a fellow Oxford NUS delegate who has campaigned strongly for Oxford to disaffiliate from the NUS.

Alex Chalmers, who sparked the anti-Semitism scandal in OULC, would also have been suspended from the Party
Alex Chalmers, who sparked the anti-Semitism scandal in OULC, would also have been suspended from the Party

Nominating candidates from other parties is contrary to Labour Party rules. The Party has sent Klemperer a letter informing him of his suspension and leaving him 14 days to appeal.

A spokesperson of the Party confirmed this information and told Cherwell, “The Labour Party has written to David Klemperer and an investigation is currently underway.”

Alex Chalmers, the former OULC co-Chair who resigned in February over concerns of anti-Semitism in the Club was also named in the email chain seen by Cherwell.

Describing Chalmers as one of the “two who instigated the anti-Semitism row at OULC,” the emails confirm that Chalmers would also have been suspended from the Labour Party had he not already cancelled his membership of the Party just “a few days after he resigned as co-Chair of OULC”.

Public records show that Chalmers, like Klemperer, also nominated Harry Samuels as the Liberal Democrat candidate for Carfax ward.

The controversy comes just days after the release of Baroness Royall’s investigation into anti-Semitism in OULC, which found no evidence of “institutional anti-Semitism” in the Club.

Controversially, however, the details of alleged individual incidents of anti-Semitism in OULC were withheld from publication in the report. The full details of the investigation into the individual instances of antisemitism are expected to be published in the coming months as part of the Chakrabarti report.

No individuals have yet been suspended from the Labour Party as a result of Royall’s investigation.

Yes To NUS Facebook likes soar in suspicious circumstances

0

In a new development this morning in the battle over Oxford’s referendum on NUS membership, questions have been raised over the overnight increase in Facebook likes on the ‘Yes to NUS Oxford’ campaign’s page.

The page, which as of 17.30 on May 20 had 2,100 likes, gained 1,144 in the week commencing May 16 and over 800 on May 20 alone. As the graph below shows, the majority of that number was gained overnight on the May 19, giving the page a boost of 92 per cent on the previous week’s gain. This amounts to five likes a minute.

Facebook SSResearch by Cherwell found that only 656 people who have liked the page have established countries on their Facebook profiles, according to a social media analytics site, contributing less than 40 per cent of people who have liked the group.

Séan Ó Néill, Yes to NUS social media manager said, “We are as amused as anyone to see these numbers. We’ve contacted the RO and are working out how best to make sure that all our support is as genuine as the support we have from liberation groups, the OUSU President, Target Schools, and so many more.”

The addition of such a number of likes in a short space of time also raises questions about the expenditure of the Yes to NUS campaign, which according to OUSU Standing Orders is capped at £230.

The controversy comes just days after the formal appointment of ‘No Thanks, NUS’ to lead the no vote side and ‘Yes to NUS’ to argue for remaining in the national union.

The appointment of the campaigns marks a two week long campaigning period before the referendum in sixth week.

Preview: Arcadia

0

There’s something truly endearing about seeing an actor genuinely succumb to the role they’re playing; I can’t help but feel that Rory Grant, playing Septimus Hodge in Arcadia at the O’Reilly, might have taken this slightly too far. As I entered the rehearsal room for this preview, he strode towards me, and provided me with a list of adjectives he’d like to be described as for his first appearance in a student newspaper. I will leave them here so I can get on with my job: “Humorous, attractive, sexually alluring, witty, well-endowed, thrustily lunging, wry, candid, channelling the zeitgeist, the voice of a generation, a star of the future and a raw talent.” The fact that this was exactly the way that Stoppard’s vivacious tutor might have introduced himself made for a blurring of lines between the performative and the earnest, which I suspect the playwright himself would have rather enjoyed.

With the pleasantries out of the way, I was treated to a showing of the first two scenes of Arcadia. For those that aren’t familiar with the play, it concerns the country house of Sidley Park, in two temporally distant, but thematically proximate times – 1809 and the modern day. The 1809 scene was dominated by the precocious protégé Thomasina, portrayed by Tallulah Vaughan with just the right blend of doe-eyed naivety and cutting wit – the discussion of carnal embrace, and her relative degree of ‘innocence’ had a fraught tension to it which I can only hope will carry through in the performance.

Similarly attention grabbing was Thomasina’s mother, Lady Croom – played by Lara Marks, who channels a chillingly Bracknell-esque tone when expressing her outrage at the changes to the Gazebo in the garden. The contrast between self important mother and genius daughter is compounded by Thomasina’s tutor Septimus, whose questionable sexual exploits not only further his charge’s learning, but almost lead to a fight with Ezra Chater (Fred Wienand) – the bumbling botanist and cuckold, who “thinks he’s written a poem”, and whose literary pretensions Septimus preys on to great effect.

The farcical events of duels and landscape gardening which predominate the 1809 scenes are given new meaning in the modern scenes – egotistical academics Bernard Nightingale (Ollie Skan) and Hannah Jarvis (Imo Reeve-Tucker) fight over book sales and Byron, both equally certain that they know the truth about Sidley, and intent on getting what they want out of the house. Skan brings a slightly manic energy to Bernard, which had me in uncontrollable fits of giggles; Reeve-Tucker on the other hand brings a refreshing blast of no-nonsense honesty to a play that has an undeniable volume of nonsense in it. These pretentious dons are, of course, just as farcical as their 19th century forebears at Sidley, as great theories about Byron, Romanticism and the irrational spirit collapse into the realities of Septimus Hodge the randy tutor.

Speaking to the directors, Issy Fidderman and Surya Bowyer, the thing that really shone through was their shared devotion to the text. This O’Reilly bid was first put together in early Michaelmas, when more than 150 people auditioned for just 14 places on the cast. As a result, they’ve spent an inordinate amount of time poring over Stoppard’s script, in all its post-modern intricacy.

Stoppard has, on occasion, been accused of self-indulgence – increasingly esoteric and learned references make for longer scripts, and bored-er audiences. There are no worries of that with this production, where focus on the layers of humour (everything from quantum physics to your mum jokes), and frenetic pace of the drama are at the heart of the production. Without giving away any spoilers, an increasingly cluttered stage, and intermingled time zones lead to a crescendo full of heat, light, laughs, sorrow, and just maybe, the inevitable heat death of the universe. This is not one to be missed.

Preview: Sweeney Todd

0

It’s always a risky business, al fresco theatre, and especially so in Oxford where the rain seems to find a way of sticking around even when the rest of Britain is sunny (and especially if for once you don’t need to be in the library). When I arrive at Queen’s gardens to see a preview of the Eglesfield Musical Society’s open air production of Sweeney Todd, the sky is threateningly grey, and it’s just on the edge of starting to pour down on me; the tension amongst the cast and crew is palpable. They’re well prepared for any eventuality, however, be it rain or shine, armed with an alternative indoor theatre venue and a plethora of long-range forecasts.

Sweeney Todd, the tale of the “demon barber of Fleet Street,” follows a murderous joint enterprise between barber Sweeney and his neighbour, Mrs Lovett, who have their fingers (and customers) in many pies. The scene I saw showed Eoghan McNelis giving hints of both the relaxed and maniacal side of Sweeney while Mrs Lovett was expressively portrayed by Lila Chrisp, with an infectious humour and lyrical cockney accent that had me grinning from the outset. In several productions of this show I’ve found Mrs Lovett to be the show-stealer, so watch this space!

I manage to grab a few moments with director Olivia Hugh-Jones between numbers, and she explains the challenges of staging an outdoors production and the limits it necessarily places on staging and sound, but from what I see and hear they seem to be on to a winner. Plus, it does come with its benefits – as the show goes on and the themes become darker, so will the sky in a beautiful, effort free lighting effect. Coupled with colourful washes on the walls of the quad and carefully placed spotlights (“The cheekbones!” enthuses the director), this should be very effective.

The Victorian setting of the original show has made way for a more contemporary and “less is more” staging which has certainly been done successfully before and seems to be well set up here, using modern monochrome costumes and pared back scenery. Olivia explains that “performances have to be honest and open – especially since the cast will be very much exposed outside.”

Considering that the first outdoor tech rehearsal was only the previous day, the cast and orchestra are sounding remarkably tight, with only a few missed lines or rushed sections, which will hopefully settle down by the time of the real thing.

First time musical director Laurence Jeffcoate capably led the orchestra (and this was despite several key members being absent, I was later informed!), but he lays the credit firmly at the feet of the “fantastic” players and cast. I hope the sound carries well for the actual performances; the orchestra is off to the side of the stage due to the shape of the quad and it can be a challenge to make sure the balance between voices and music is right, but from what I heard they’re coping well.

If the rest of the show is at the standard of the little I saw, this looks to be an exciting performance of what is a brilliant musical; all the cast and crew can do is hope for the rain to hold off. If you want to go then it’s best to hope for no rain too – tickets have already sold out but more will be available on the door if performances are outside! I’ve certainly got my fingers crossed.

What happened to Pussy Riot?

0

Pussy Riot became a household name in 2012. After a concert in the Church of Christ the Saviour in Moscow on February 12, security forces arrested two of the leaders (Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Maria Alyokhina) while a third (Yekaterina Samutsevich) was arrested 13 days later. The other two fled the country.

The crime was officially ‘hooliganism motivated by religious hatred’. However, the song for which they received this label has just been translated into English in a cover by Norwegian folk troubadour Moddi, and what becomes clear is how non-blasphemous the original track was. ‘Punk Prayer – Mother of God, Drive Putin away!’, is not so much blasphemous as a comment on the corruption which bound the government and the Russian Orthodox Church. Patriarch Kirillich pronounced that Putin was ‘a gift from God’, while Kirillich’s coronation was attended by Prime Minister Medvedev and President Putin. Thus, Pussy Riot’s critique is not blasphemous. By invoking, not besmirching, the name of the Virgin Mary to drive Putin away, they are highlighting that religion must never be entwined with politics (and vice versa).

For Pussy Riot, the religious leaders had become compromised by their love of Putin – in theological terms, they had become guilty of idol worship. In translation, Moddi has given us an opportunity to re-evaluate their views, their defence of gay rights, religion and free speech and the tragedy of their subsequent suppression. But as long as we are here to listen to them, they will not be suppressed. Even as soon as 2014, the band performed at the Sochi Winter Olympics, where they were attacked with whips by security. The revolutionary spirit lives on.

Review: A Moon Shaped Pool

0

Radiohead’s ninth LP, A Moon Shaped Pool, is more immediate than one has come to expect from the Oxford-based band. Lead single and album opener ‘Burn The Witch’ sees sharp, urgent strings operating alongside synths, as Thom Yorke’s falsetto threatens, “we know where you live”; the sheer drive of the song, as well as its relatively conventional structure, seems foreign given their penchant for left-field experimentation. ‘Decks Dark’ and ‘Identikit’ are similarly accessible. The latter, a standout, even features a Jonny Greenwood guitar solo and a powerful, emotional refrain: “broken hearts make it rain”. Incidentally, Greenwood’s work scoring two films for Paul Thomas Anderson (The Master and Inherent Vice) has evidently had a bearing here, with lush orchestration prevalent throughout.

Yorke’s separation last year from his partner of 23 years seems to dominate proceedings here. When the reversed and slowed vocals in the outro to ‘Daydreaming’ are restored to normal, Yorke is in fact repeatedly singing: “half of my life, half of my love”. Given that he was aged 46 at the time of the split, his 23-year relationship would indeed amount to half of his life. Elsewhere, ‘Decks Dark’, ‘Identikit, ‘Present Tense’ and ‘True Love Waits’ each also deal (relatively) explicitly with broken love. However, much of the album expresses more general anxieties about the state of our world, but through the prism of personal heartbreak. ‘The Numbers’ (“we are of the earth”; “we call upon the people”; “we’ll take back what is ours”) and ‘Daydreaming’ (“the damage is done”; “this goes / beyond me / beyond you”) both seem concerned with climate change, which Yorke has spoken out on. ‘Burn The Witch’, meanwhile, is a critique of anti-immigration politicians and the refugee crisis, at least according to the animator behind its stop-motion music video.

Only three of the 11 songs included here are truly brand new, with numerous live favourites at long last recorded. Closer ‘True Love Waits’ has been around in various incarnations since 1995, while ‘Burn The Witch’ was first birthed during sessions for Kid A in 1999. Every band has an expiry date, and with each member nearing their fifties, this could be Radiohead’s; if it does prove to be the case, there could be few better ways to bow out.