Thursday, May 1, 2025
Blog Page 1048

Rewind: Apollo 18 & 13

0

In this week, in this month, in 1972, Apollo 18 was meant to launch. It never did, due to budget cuts under Nixon’s administration, but also because Apollo 13 cast a long shadow over future space missions. As the closest shave in NASA’s history, Apollo 13 made the dangers of space exploration apparent to captivated worldwide audiences; so apparent that they could not be ignored. Better to spend the money on the Vietnam War than risk American lives in the cosmic void.

I can sympathise. I experience my own version of Apollo 13 every Fourth Week of term. As JFK famously said, we do not book Black Tie Formal because it is easy, but because it is hard.

Mission launch is 4.30pm, Thursday. (This doesn’t correspond with Apollo 13 – I can only make this comparison so believable). Weather is good. Wind is low. No sign of rain. T-minus 3, 2, 1. Initial launch is successful. Formal booking website loads successfully, and login details are correct. So far, so good.

Suddenly, an external oxygen canister explodes/login stalls under the weight of college traffic. Shit hits the fan. Houston, we have a problem. The damage is catastrophic and chances of survival are dropping by the minute. Quick, shut it down, shut it all down! Turn off your internets, your Snapchats, your Buzzfeeds. If the Russians can shut off radio frequencies to avoid interfering with Apollo’s transmissions, you can stop clogging up the internet with all of your duck face pics – I want fucking Oreo cake.

There’s only one chance of getting back/ back in alive, and it’s hella risky. It’s not as risky as building a makeshift carbon dioxide filter in space, but it’s as brave; log back out and back in. There’s only limited voltage (laptop battery is low). We have to give it a go, failure is not an option. Cut to montage of prayers being said, pained expression on family members’ faces, visible clouds of baited breath. A long, ominous radio silence. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Odyssey, this is Houston, do you read?

Hello Oliver, this is the Merton Formal Booking System, it’s good to see you again. YYYYYYEEEEESSSSS. My meal booking splashes down just like the Odyssey module did into the Pacific. It’s a perilous business, this formal booking malarkey. But God, it’s exciting.

Profile: Marina & The Diamonds

0

The moment I enter the Union I realise that Marina Lambrini Diamandis, better known as Marina & the Diamonds, is quite literally two steps ahead of me. Having exited the chamber, I hear laughter as she bounds up the stairs enthusiastically. I catch a flash of short, dark curls and sleek blue velvet before she disappears through the imposing archway of the Gladstone Room. I hurriedly follow her in and Marina’s eyes settle on me in delight: “You must be the student press!” The notion, clearly, is an exciting one. And with such a unique reaction to my arrival, it takes no less than an instant to warm to this energetic and engaging woman who, it becomes quickly apparent, is fully deserving of the international recognition she has received.

It is easy to assume that Marina, so animated and well-styled as an indie pop-star, has always lived a life similar to the fast-paced environment that she finds herself in now. But Marina’s international fame and widespread musical influence did not come to her instantly or without a lot of hard work and effort. “It’s funny when you’re going through it, it doesn’t feel like there are any sacrifices, or that it is all particularly hard.” Marina settles into her chair and her expression grows grave. “But looking back at it, I definitely knew that there were some terrible periods. It wasn’t quite that I was depressed because I always knew I was going to make it. But life in general was, well, hard.” She shakes her head as she recollects her post-school years. “Coming to a new city and not knowing a single person there is actually pretty tough. I was on my own in London to start with.” She gestures to her surroundings. “Being a part of a university is so important to make those kinds of connections. Without being connected to a university, I didn’t have that social environment.”

I find it hard to imagine that this openly friendly woman was on her own for too long, however. Her carefree demeanour is highly charismatic and there is a noticeable awareness of her presence from all the members in the room. “Honestly, it took me so long to find people who I really liked”, she tells me. “It can take a while to find people who are like-minded individuals. I actually really felt that the creation of Marina & the Diamonds was a way that attracted certain individuals into my life and that is how I saw music. It was very much a way of uniting people and doing the whole likes-attract.”

Success, when it did inevitably happen to Marina, didn’t come as much of a surprise. “When I got signed I simply wasn’t that jubilant. It solved my financial problems pretty much instantly.” She smiles at me coyly. “But I didn’t celebrate or anything. It was more of a case of, well now that that’s done, I’m able to do this and that. And of course, I’m able to create an album. So there was never much pause for thought. It’s actually only really been in the last years, especially with Froot, that I’ve been able to enjoy everything. I can see what I have been able to do and I know that that’s not ‘the norm’. Whereas at the time it felt like I was just really blinkered.” She laughs at her own words and the gaiety of her expression returns.

We fall onto the topic of her highly original 2012 album Electra Heart, famously known for its conceptual caricatures of American archetypes. Despite its purpose to imitate, I ask her whether she feels that she can personally identify with any of the themes that her album approaches. She throws her head back and laughs aloud – “Absolutely!” she cries, “Absolutely! The aesthetic side of it was driven by the fact that the sound that I had acquired for that album wasn’t really true to me, but it was a result of working with a lot of ‘big-name’ producers. I was being encouraged to take that pop route and to come out as a pop star. Yet I didn’t feel that was really ‘me’ so adopting a different guise was my way of dealing with it. Lyrically, it was different. That was totally authentic; songs like ‘Primadonna’ and ‘Heartbreaker’ are really just me mirroring what I saw in terms of female archetypes in our society. It’s like the Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton effect. That’s what pop is for; it’s a mirror. It’s telling you about a certain moment that you’re living in, be that bad or good. But then there were songs like ‘Teen Idle’ and ‘Starring Role’ that were more simple and not at all multi-layered.” ‘Starring Role’ is one of a string of songs that lament love and reflect on emotionally damaging relationships, adding to the complexity of the album’s fictional alter-ego duality. “There has been a lot of heartache” Marina adds, “But it’s not necessarily because of boys or love. I think one of the main themes throughout all three albums is to do with identity. In my first album, The Family Jewels, it was me figuring out my identity. Electra Heart was questioning it, and then Froot confirming it. Identity is definitely one of the central themes. Questioning who you are and why you are that way, I suppose.” She pauses. “Everyone will have events in their life that will influence the things that they do. For me – well, I can’t think of anything precisely. There was a lot of stuff from my upbringing, it was happy but also it wasn’t. I guess like everybody, there are things that will mark you for the rest of your life, and definitely form your story. Everybody has their story in life, don’t they? I don’t know what mine is. I guess you probably know better than I do.”

We laugh as I point out that the more I listen to her music, the less I understand her. The lyrics from her songs sometimes cover intertwined topics and as a result present conflicting stories. It is perhaps this complex layering of personalities and experiences that make Marina’s music so elusive and unique to the music industry. Marina’s music is encouraging in its self-acceptance as her confidence in herself also embraces a range of themes that are not classifiably black and white.

She tells me how now she feels that she can explore other things, specifically particular social concerns of hers, her song ‘Savages’ being demonstrative of this. “A lot of it is actually just me being curious, asking why human beings are the way that they are. We are so complex, and I don’t like approaching something from a role of condemning it, it’s not me having to reinforce that war and rape are bad because they obviously are, it’s more of a question of ‘why?’. You know; why is that ingrained in us? And acknowledging the fact that we have an animalistic side and that yet we still think that we are civilised human beings.”

Leaving these dark topics behind, the conversation turns to synaesthesia. I ask Marina if and how her personal experience of synaesthesia ever manifests itself, be it lyrically or visually within her work. “I’ve heard a lot of varying accounts from other people who have synaesthesia,” she tells me, “Accounts where people smell colour, or they actually see it, but for me it’s not that at all. It sounds weird to everyone else, but I associate colours with days of the week, and numbers and musical notes. It’s not something I actually see, it’s more of a colour sensitivity. And that definitely affects the way that I have worked visually. Each album creates a world in which fans can immerse themselves. It’s not just an MP3. I have a huge role in the direction of the music videos.”

As the interview draws to a close, Marina leans in towards me. “It’s such a pleasure to be asked real questions by you.” Her eyes shine playfully. “Really, I’ve been so impressed by everyone in Oxford. There was even a little nine-year-old girl in the chamber who asked me about how I could help her to be a heart breaker and why I wrote the song.” She does an imitation of the girl’s voice and chuckles in amusement to herself. But doesn’t she live by that? “Not any more, but at the time I ferociously did!” Poor men in London! She grins, “But it didn’t last long though.” Oh we know, Marina, we know.

Spiking their way to success

0

It has been an exciting and demanding season for the Oxford University Volleyball Team this winter. Both the men’s and the women’s teams compete in the BUCS in addition to the Varsity Match, with both teams also fielding an NVL team and a second squad each, making it one of the most popular sports in Oxford by team. Although there is considerable overlap between the Blues and the NVL squads, the NVL’s rules allow for the addition of post-doctorate students and alumni, making volleyball also one of the most age-diverse sports at the University.

When considering what fosters popularity, success is usually one of the most prominent reasons, and this certainly holds true for the Volleyball Blues. The men’s 1st team have had a fantastic season, climbing to the top of the BUCS rankings with an undefeated season. Their most recent victories, a decisive 3-0 shutout over Warwick and a 3-1 victory over third place Loughborough show the dominant offense that the team has been able to build. When asked what led to such an advantage over other divisional competitors, captain Stefan Nekovar observed that having such a large team-17 members-from which to field an on court offense gave Oxford great depth and a variety of strengths. The payoff has obviously been tremendous.

The women’s team has also had a solid season, currently ranking third in the BUCS. Although the season started disappointingly, the Blues bounced back strong with back to back victories, including a 3-0 victory over King’s College London. Although the record shows them at .500, such a strong defensive showing promises more fantastic matches in the near future.

Rivals Cambridge compete with both Blues teams in the annual Varsity Match, held this year on February 20th. Prior to the 2014-2015 season, the Oxford men’s team had gone four years without a win; however, last year the curse was finally broken and the trophy has returned to its rightful home. Even better, the team are heavy favorites to win again this season, given their outstanding record. The Oxford women’s Blues are also defending champions, and are looking to increase their victory streak over last place Cambridge, who just recently concluded their sixth straight loss. Given such matchups, Oxford are a clear bet for this season’s game.

The NVL teams have also had great success this year, with the women’s team standing undefeated in Division 1 more than halfway through the season. With the exception of one particularly tense match between Oxford and Herts VC, the women’s NVL have secured shutout victories in every game they’ve played. The men’s NVL, who compete in Division 3, started the season with an unfortunate but close loss versus New Forest but quickly bounced back to claim victories over Cardiff and Bristol.

Aside from its inclusivity and popularity-new and inexperienced students are encouraged to try out for NVL teams with a free first training session-the volleyball team captains also attribute the team’s recent successes to the dedication and training that their athletes demonstrate every week. Training sessions run two hours on weekdays and three hours on weekends, interspersed with long weekend tournaments. Volleyball is one of the most match-intensive sports, with triangulars or games taking place almost every weekend and sometimes on back to back days. This kind of schedule can be exhausting, but several team members cited the competition-heavy schedule as one of their favourite things about the sport, pointing out that the best practice comes not just from drills and conditioning, but also gameday situations. One women’s NVL member said that there is very little that matches the excitement that comes from playing in real time, and that the best way to prepare is just to play as much as possible.

The teams are certainly set up for a challenging and competitive end to the season. The championships don’t end with Varsity; the teams will also be competing in the BUCS trophy tournament. Weekly knockout rounds begin on the seventeenth, the same week as the Varsity Match, and continue into the first weekend in March for what promises to be an intense few weeks for the volleyball squads. Given such excellent showings across the board, the players and their fans are excited about their continuing to dominate on the court.

An open letter to OULC

0

Dear Sirs,

On Monday 15th February, the members of Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) voted to endorse Oxford’s so-called “Israeli Apartheid Week”. As former and current Chairs and Executive members of OULC, Jewish student leaders and other members and friends of Oxford University, we condemn and oppose this poorly considered course of action. We also congratulate the bold decision of one of the current Co-Chairs, Alex Chalmers, to resign in response. “Israeli Apartheid Week” purports to be a conference promoting intellectual discussion. In reality it is little more than a gathering of activists promoting a one-sided narrative, seeking to dismantle the only majority-Jewish member-state of the United Nations.

It principally serves as a vehicle for promoting the academic, cultural and economic isolation of the Jewish state. In doing so, it strengthens the hand of those who oppose the two-state solution and emboldens extremists who seek to “resolve” the conflict by extinguishing one of the parties to it.

It is wrong to contend that Israel – a multiracial democracy – even remotely resembles the horrors of South Africa’s racist dictatorship. Israel is a nation largely composed of refugees and their descendants – from both Europe and the Arab world, living in a land to which they have deep historical and religious ties. It is not a settler-colonial state. It belongs to the Middle East’s rich tapestry of religious and ethnic diversity. Today, more than ever, minorities in the Middle East need their own states. Worse still, the appropriation of the term “apartheid” is an affront to black South Africans. The supporters of “Israeli Apartheid Week” would do well to remember the words of Nelson Mandela: “As a movement we recognise the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognise the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism. We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigour support the Palestinian right to national self-determination.” We share this vision and believe it is in the best traditions of OULC – and more importantly, the ethos and values of Oxford University.

We don’t pretend for a second that there are no problems in Israel-Palestine. We don’t ignore the imperfections of Israeli society. We don’t overlook the tragedy of conflict. But we are troubled by OULC’s decision and feel compelled to speak out. In a climate of rising anti-Semitism, we have a duty to oppose initiatives that foster an intolerant political culture which intimidates Jewish students.

Lastly – but most distressingly – we observe with horror what Mr Chalmers describes in his note of resignation: “members of the Executive throwing around the term ‘Zio’ (a term for Jews usually confined to websites run by the Ku Klux Klan)”; senior members expressing “solidarity” with Hamas; claims that “most accusations of anti-Semitism are just the Zionists crying wolf” and the fact that “a large proportion of both OULC and the student left in Oxford more generally have some kind of problem with Jews”.

We note that OULC and the Labour Party have a long and distinguished history of fighting racism and injustice – and we therefore urge current members to remember that tradition and to reconsider their distressing decision.

Yours sincerely,

Baroness Ruth Deech, QC (Hon) DBE, Former Principal (St Anne’s College)

Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC

Lord Pannick QC

John Mann MP

John Bowers QC

Professor Richard Susskind OBE

 

Oxford University Labour Club

Ella Taylor (Executive Committee)

Louis McEvoy (Executive Committee)

David Klemperer (Co-Chair MT 2015)

David Cesar-Heymann (Co-Chair HT 2015)

Helena Dollimore (Co-Chair MT 2013)

Aled Jones (Co-Chair MT 2013)

Jonathan Metzer (Co-Chair TT 2013)

Tom Adams (Co-Chair MT 2012)

Anthony Breach (Co-Chair TT 2012)

Kevin Feeney (Co-Chair TT 2012)

Claire Smith, Co-Chair 2012

Lincoln Hill (Co-Chair TT 2011)

Colin Jackson (Co-Chair 2011)

Kathleen Shields (Co-Chair HT 2011)

Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson (Executive Committee TT 2014)

Jack Evans (Co-Chair HT 2011)

Tom Rutland (ex OUSU President 2013-14, OULC Executive Committee 2011)

Hannah Cusworth (Co-Chair HT 2010)

Alistair Strathern (Co-Chair TT 2010)

Kieran Cunningham (Co-Chair MT 2010)

Jacob Turner (Co-Chair TT 2009)

Ben Lyons (Co-Chair 2009)

Ayo Ajanaku (Co-Chair 2009)

Emily Benn (Executive TT 2009)

Jamie Susskind (Co-Chair TT 2009)

Martha MacKenzie (Executive Committee 2009)

David Green (Co-Chair TT 2008)

Sarah Hutchinson (Co-Chair TT 2008)

Alice Taylor (Co-Chair 2008)

Mark Baker (Co-Chair TT 2007)

Harriet Myles (Co-Chair 2007)

Phillip Patterson (Co-Chair TT 2006)

Martin McCluskey (Co-Chair MT 2005)

Stephen Longden (Co-Chair HT 2005)

Alex Brodkin (Co-Chair 2005)

Jack Graves (Co-Chair 2005)

 

Oxford University Jewish Society

Yoni Stone (Current JSoc President)

Aaron Simons (Former JSoc President)

Jake Berger (Former JSoc Vice-President)

Matt Rose (Former JSoc President)

Paul Erdunast (Former JSoc president)

Rachel Grabiner (Former JSoc Vice-President)

David Miron (Former JSoc Vice-President)

Rebecca Freedman (Former JSoc Vice-President)

Vladimir Bermant (Former JSoc President)
 
Andrew Freedman (Former JSoc President, barrister)

 

Oxford University Chabad Society

Jonathan Hunter (Former Oxford Chabad President, Former Vice-President of JSoc)

Sam Bodansky (Current Oxford Chabad President)

Fien Barnett-Neefs (Current Oxford Chabad Vice-President)

 

Oxford University Liberal Democrats

Jack Ford (Co-Chair)

Matt Sumption (Former Co-Chair)

Anne Cremin (Secretary)

 

Oxford University Conservative Association

Thomas Jackson (President)

Shane Finn (Treasurer)

William Robert Rees-Mogg (Committee Member)

Richard Black (Ex-Publications Editor, Former JSoc Publicity Officer)

Dan Freeman (Ex-Political Officer)

Jack Matthews (Ex-President)

Jan Nedvidek (Ex-President)

Benjamin Woolf (Ex-Returning Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

100th birthday for lacrosse varsity

0

As its Oxford-Cambridge Varsity match enter its 100th year, Lacrosse continues to be one of the fastest growing sports in the UK. To mark the momentous, historically significant occasion, University Parks is set to be transformed into a hub of on and off-field entertainment this February 27th. Following the controversial government decision to retract visas from a number of American coaches, who were in the UK to develop the sport, Lacrosse needs this high-profile day of matches at now more than ever. 

To reflect this, and the general magnitude of the occasion, this year’s event is bigger than ever. The smorgasbord of sport will begin early, as both men’s and women’s alumni teams take on Cambridge opposition. In total, seven matches will be played across the day, and ex-Chair of the England Lacrosse Association David Shuttleworth will be presenting the trophies. Oxford rarely allow a moment of historical significance to pass quietly, so an alum from the 50th Varsity match will join Shuttleworth at the day’s presentations. The fact that this is the first year both men’s and women’s second teams’ will have their own trophy is a mark of just how far the sport has come.

Katharine Bailey, the women’s Blues captain, sees this year’s encounter as a perfect opportunity to celebrate the ‘amazing team sport’ and the ‘friendly and vibrant university clubs’ that have been fostered in both Blue camps. Given the sport itself is technical, physical and incredibly athletic, a full programme of matches from Blues to alumni looks set to be one of the sporting highlights of Hilary term. 

Of course when it comes to Varsity, putting ceremony aside, only one thing matters: the result. Whilst Bailey is under no illusions as to challenge her Blues side face – they have lost 12-11 and 8-4 to their undefeated light Blue counterparts this year – she is confident Oxford can reverse these narrow defeats to put the recently crowned South Premier champions ‘in their place’. For the women’s seconds, which Bailey describes as ‘one of the strongest’ squads that she can remember, a 12-6 victory over Cambridge in Michaelmas provides cause for buoyant optimism as their Varsity match approaches. Obviously, as with all great one-off sporting encounters, the form book rarely counts for anything. The fact both women’s squads have been approaching training with an exceptional ‘enthusiasm and intensity’, therefore, has left Bailey confident, if not expectant. 

On the men’s side of the encounter, both the Blues and the seconds will be looking to build on a hugely successful 2014-2015 season, which culminated in an outstanding set of Varsity performances on Cambridge soil. Whilst the second team drew 12-12 against a Cambridge side with far greater depth, the Blues secured an impressive win. In fact, last year’s 13-10 triumph sealed the men’s Blues fourth consecutive victory, so success in this 100th anniversary year will come with a special significance. 

As a university sport, Lacrosse is growing in support and the quality of on-field performances is, as a result, rapidly improving. This trend is being reflected across the country. However, as the movement of foreign coaches into the country to promote and develop the sport is restricted, Lacrosse still has a long way to go. The 100th Oxbridge Varsity encounter will undoubtedly help to protect and progress the profile of this burgeoning sport.

Is it the end of the road for TMO?

0

With modern technology offering ever-increasing ways of utilizing video reviews and additional support for match officials, should sports reject the advances or are they simply stalling the inevitable?

Let us return to the events of the summer, during the Rugby World Cup quarter final, when official Craig Joubert awarded Australia a last minute penalty without consulting the Technical Match Official (TMO,) commonly known as a video referee. The resulting three-point kick sent Australia to the semis and Scotland crashing out. It was one of the most controversial moments of what was otherwise a fantastic summer of sport.

There are concerns in rugby that we are moving towards a situation where the real referee is the man in the car park in an office next to the television scanner rather than the highly-trained official in the centre of the pitch. Previously, and at levels of the game without TMO, the whole nature of being a rugby referee is that your word is final and everyone respects that decision. The level of respect is far superior to that in football and many other sports.

However, TMO has made referees doubt themselves. The referee should be the sole arbiter and have complete liberty over making his decisions. When you have a TMO in the background, the referees end up getting more things wrong because they are not as decisive. It breeds doubt which by its nature is not a trait anyone wants a referee to have, especially in a sport as fast-paced and free-flowing as rugby.

So then what are the arguments for video view and additional support for match referees in any sport? Accuracy seems to be the main argument, namely that the right decisions will be made and everyone will go home happy. Controversy will be removed from a situation. However, to believe that a few slow-motion shots from a variety of angles will remove all doubt from a complex sporting situation is ludicrous. In rugby, tackles always look ten times more serious in slow motion, leading to an increasing number of sin bin offences that should never have been given.

If it doesn’t remove the controversy from all situations, then is there a place for it in the game? Despite all the criticisms above, I would say yes, but only in limited circumstances. At the discretion of the man in the centre of the pitch, technology can be used to ascertain in cases of disputes where there is a clear binary whether a try should be awarded, or a ball crossed the goal line. Even so, it should be used sparingly so as not to disrupt the flow of the game, the speed of the action and the sense of spontaneity and jubilance when a try or goal has been awarded.

Technology should be embraced in the name of accuracy and fairness, but not at the expense of the spirit of the game. It should always be remembered that rugby, football, all sports in fact are games of humans and we should love them for their imperfections. Sport belongs to men and women, not robots, and it should stay that way.

Cross-party coalition slams OULC in open letter

0

A cross-party coalition of student politicians, academics and public figures has signed an open letter for publication in Cherwell condemning and opposing Oxford University Labour Club’s (OULC) vote to endorse Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW), an annual series of lectures that opposes Israeli occupation of Palestine and supports Boycott, Divest and Sanction movements.

The letter’s 65 signatories include more than 30 former OULC Co-Chairs, as well as a number of Oxford University Jewish Society and Chabad Society current and ex-leaders, and significant figures from both Oxford University Liberal Democrats and Oxford University Conservative Association, including presidents of both. Six public figures have also signed the letter, such as Baroness Ruth Deech, Former Principal of St Anne’s College, and legal expert Lord Carlile of Berriew QC.

The signatories express “horror” at the anti-Semitism within the club alleged by Alex Chalmers in his resignation as OULC Co-Chair on February 15th.

They continue by criticising OULC’s “poorly-considered choice of action” to endorse IAW, which they describe as “little more than a gathering of activists promoting a one-sided narrative, seeking to dismantle the only majority-Jewish member-state of the United Nations.”

IAW is especially controversial this year given that the theme of “solidarity with Palestinian popular resistance” coincides with a resurgence of attacks on Jewish civilians since October.

The signatories add that “it is wrong to contend that Israel – a multiracial democracy – even remotely resembles the horrors of South Africa’s racist dictatorship.”

“Today, more than ever,” they write, “minorities in the Middle East need their own state.” The letter also challenges the use of the term ‘apartheid’ to refer to Israeli policy, saying, “The appropriation of the term ‘apartheid’ is an affront to black South Africans.”

While acknowledging the “imperfections of Israeli society,” the signatories state that “in a climate of rising anti-Semitism, we have a duty to oppose initiatives that foster an intolerant political culture which intimidates Jewish students.”

The letter highlights as “most” distressing Chalmers’ examples of anti-Semitism, like “members of the [OULC] Executive throwing around the term ‘Zio’ (a term for Jews usually confined to websites run by the Ku Klux Klan.)”

The signatories end their letter by calling for members of OULC to return to the organisation’s “distinguished history” of combating prejudice.

Chalmers’ resignation is a move that has earned attention outside of Oxford as well, provoking significant national and Israeli coverage as well as stirring up broader debate about anti-Semitism within the left.

The Oxford University Jewish Society (JSoc) responded swiftly to Chalmers’ statement, writing that it was in full support of his decision but “unsurprised” by the anti-Semitic reports.

In a statement released on its Facebook page, the society claimed, “It is not the first time that Oxford JSoc has had to deal with anti-Semitic incidents within the student left and it will not be the last.

“It is a significant and worrying issue and one that on many occasions, Jewish students have felt that they are fighting alone.”

The statement added that Jewish students who attempt to point out anti-Semitism often have their concerns dismissed by liberal students, or outright mocked. But the accusations of anti-Semitism have provoked contrition among Labour leadership, with few choosing to defend the club.

Although both Michael Muir, former Social Secretary, and Noni Csogor, Chalmer’s Co-Chair, said that the vote to support IAW at Oxford was not itself indicative of anti-Semitism, the OULC official statement on Wednesday made no mention of the club’s vote, and only vowed to begin the process of investigating anti-Semitism among its membership.

Writing that it “whole-heartedly” condemned anti-Semitism “in all its forms,” OULC promised to co-operate fully with an investigation launched by the national group Labour Students into anti-Semitism and intimidation of Jewish students by OULC members.

Labour Students has already begun to make steps in their probe. A letter on behalf of Labour Students’ National Chair Michael Rubin was posted in JSoc’s Facebook group on Thursday afternoon and sent out by email a few hours later, with Rubin writing that he was “keen to meet with any member who has experienced or witnessed anti-Semitism” or could otherwise aid in Labour Students’ investigation. Evidence is to be submitted by Monday 22nd February and Rubin said Labour Students aims to publish its findings the day after.

On Wednesday, both the Israeli embassy in London and British Labour leadership issued statements condemning the alleged anti-Semitism within OULC.

Ed Miliband also cancelled plans to address OULC at its John Smith Memorial Dinner on March 4th after hearing the news.

A spokesperson for the former Labour leader told the New Statesman that Mili-band was “deeply disturbed to hear of reports of anti-Semitism in the Oxford Labour Club and would not appear until the investigation was resolved.

Later the same day, universities minister Jo Johnson urged Oxford University’s leadership to consider disciplinary sanctions, stating that “strong disciplinary action” should be “taken where necessary.”

A University spokesperson said in a statement that “Oxford University does not tolerate any form of harassment or victimisation,” but added that it “cannot comment on individual cases or complaints for reasons of confidentiality.”

Some students have extended the debate to the broader politics of the left-wing of the to the broader politics of the left-wing of the Labour party.

One Jewish student wrote in The Guardian that “the student left conceives of Jews as white.” He argued that Jews of Arabic or African descent are “ignored” and that framing Jews as white allows the left to attack the Jewish community as beneficiaries of privilege.

Similarly, a former OULC Co-Chair, David Cesar-Heymann, who also signed on to the open letter, posted on Facebook that “there has been a concerted effort from the Oxford hard left to take over the club.”

He alleged that activists linked with the Labour leader’s Momentum group are partly responsible for anti-Semitism within OULC.

Five reasons for a Premier League All-star game

0

Now, before you all boo and hiss and scream about how the All-Star game is a money-hungry American concept designed to further commercialise sport and all that we believe to be pure and holy, let me say this: I completely agree. According to the University of New Orleans Hospitality Research Center, the overall economic impact of the 2014 NBA All-Star Game in New Orleans was around $106.1 million, which isn’t even that surprising if you take into account the fact that this year, a ticket to the all-star game could cost you around $1,200.

So yes, an All-Star game ticket may cost you most of your student loan, but even if All-Star games are money-making schemes from hell, they’re justified
by their entertainment value. Take last weekend for instance, when the NBA hosted its All-Star Weekend in Toronto – forget the other events such as the Slam Dunk Contest or the three-point Shootout; the record-shattering 196-173 score-line for the game itself, in which the best talents the NBA has to offer forgot about defense and basically re-enacted Space Jam, was enough to justify the weekend’s very existence.

And that’s honestly why we need an All-Star Game for the Premier League – because it would be an incredible amount of fun for the fans, who one could argue are just as stressed throughout the season as the players. If you don’t believe me, go watch a Spurs game with my co-editor and see for yourself the strenuous impact a team can have on one’s life.

However, if you need more convincing, I’ve got a whole lot more reasons why the match needs to happen.

1. It wouldn’t even be that difficult to set up. All you need is an extra week’s gap between week 19 and 20, and the FA to pick a stadium for the match to be played in. The choosing of the teams will be fan-dominated – every fan who chooses to vote gets to select his or her Dream XI from both sides, and players with the most votes will qualify, whilst the Premier League coaches pick the bench.

2. Have you ever played FIFA with your mate where you both pick your favourite clash of titans? This game would be just that, except it would happen in real life. Obviously, the game’s intensity will vary – at times the players would just go out and have some fun – but these footballers are competitors, and when it gets close, I’m sure that someone like Koscielny will be out there trying to dominate and break some legs and egos during the process.

3. This brings me to another reason – fans’ voices matter. Every year, when the FA picks its Team of the Year, you hear fans complain about a snub and the whole legitimacy of the team is questioned just because it doesn’t really take the fans’ consideration into account. Being picked as an All Star would be an honour. Yes, sure, the fans would obviously get it wrong from time to time, but if sport, and football in particular, is supposed to represent our ideals for society, then it damn well should be democratic.

4. The game might just be worth having just to see ArseÌ€ne Wenger and Louis van Gaal become internet memes by busting a vein complaining about how the FA is endangering their players’ health.

5. The sides ideally would be geographical – if we draw a hypothetical line below Stoke and Leicester but above Swansea and Norwich, you actually get an even division of teams between North and South, with Liverpool and Manchester-based teams headlining the North and the London Premier League squadron representing the South side. Would you not pay to watch Vardy, Mahrez and Agüero take on Fonte, Koscielny, Azpilicueta and Bellerín?

I certainly would. At the end of the day, All-Star games are just a bit of fun and a way for the league to show the fans some love, which is exactly why the Premier League needs to have one, and have soon

Lessons from history: abolition of Russian serfdom (1861)

0

Lessons on improving global working conditions can be learned from the Emancipation of the Russian serfs on this day in 1861. Tsar Alexander II’s Imperial Proclamation abolished the right of landlords to restrict the movement of their tenants, or serfs, putting an end to a system which had dominated Russian society since 1649. More than 23 million former serfs could now own property, sue in courts and vote in local elections. In reality, however, prospects for the newly emancipated remained grim.

Using money lent by the landlords themselves, they were forced to buy tiny plots of land from landowners at inflated prices, with debts often being passed down from generation to generation. Such amendments benefi tted the ruling classes whom the tsar had tasked with organising the reform.

Ultimately, emancipation, along with other attempts at modernising Russia, would prove insufficient for solving the problems of Russian society, instead contributing to the disquiet which would lead to the revolutions of the twentieth century. It might be a wise move to draw parallels between those 23 million serfs and the 27-30 million people feared by the United Nations to be slaves today.

14 million slaves are thought to live in India alone – more than one per cent of its population. As we work to emancipate modern slaves, therefore, and put an end to the de facto slavery of sweat shop workers, we must be careful to ensure that our solutions do not further compromise the world’s most vulnerable. Unlike Tsar Alexander, we must not leave reform to their enslavers.

Clickbait: The six lies you tell each week

0

There’s nothing quite as wonderful as our unshakable belief in our own abilities. Everyone hates Monday mornings, but at least it comes with that comfortable feeling that this week will somehow be different. All those broken promises we make ourselves, again and again, those honourable intentions to really improve, to get our lives together come flooding back in. Unlike Friday night, in those dread moments as we contemplate the mess we’ve made, Monday comes with a renewed sense of purpose. The start of a week makes us think we can do anything, we can have the productive week we’ve always dreamed of. Then before you know it it’s Thursday and you’ve told yourself the same old familiar lies, and here they are:

 

“This reading will only take me an hour!” 

Other people seem to get cookies, letters from home or presents in their pidge. You get a mammoth wedge of reading from your tutor for a seminar, covering fifteen extracts on a topic you didn’t even know existed. As you pull it out and feel its hefty weight crushing your soul you convince yourself that you’ll not leave it until the last minute this time. You’ll make notes and read it thoroughly, paying actual attention. Then suddenly it’s an hour before your seminar and you’ve only read the title, but admittedly you’ve read it sixteen times. You’re a quick reader! It’ll be fine. You manage to convince yourself that you can get through it all in time. Spoiler alert, you can’t. 

“I’m getting up early every day this week. Lie-ins are for the weekend.” 

But your bed is so comfy. Let’s be honest here, you’re still shattered, so maybe it’d be better if we just lay here and caught up on our sleep. Then we’d definitely pay more attention in the next lecture. That way, when it comes to working later, we’ll be so much more productive. Yeah, it totally makes sense to stay right here for another three hours. 

“No Kebabs this week. I’m only going to eat meals. No more snacking.” 

The annoying thing about this one is that you’ll keep it for a while. You’ll feel really good about yourself and find you’re actually enjoying the healthy life style. Then someone will mention Hassans, or Achmed’s, or McDonald’s or anywhere really and the image of that gorgeous fast food will float into mind. You’ll start salivating uncontrollably and a hunger will develop deep in the pit of your stomach which can only be satisfied by a pile of greasy chips laden down with cheese. There’s no fighting it, you’ve been entrapped. 

“I’m not going out this week.” 

Oh but you will. Trust me you will. It’s never just one drink. You’ll never go to just pres. Your FOMO will take over, that glittering promise that tonight could well be the best night of your life, and you will find yourself in the queue for Bridge, ignoring the little voice in your head that’s screaming at you for your terrible life decisions. 

“I’ll ring my parents more.” 

You have the best of intentions if nothing else. Then time runs away with you and when you finally get around to calling them, they genuinely seem surprised you’re not dead. 

“I’m going to tidy my room.” 

You simply cannot live like this any longer. The piles of clothes that has devoured your chair. Tripping over the empty takeaway boxes, the folders falling off the bookshelves, your unwashed bedsheets congealing on the mattress. That soul-crippling embarrassment having to reveal this ungodly mess to your scout every week. You’re going to get a black bag, you’re going to gut this place and it’s going to be sparkling clean! But you can’t do it tonight because you’re going out. Then you’ve got that essay to do. Then your parents are coming to visit. You know what? You’ll get to it at some point.