Saturday 4th April 2026
Blog Page 1054

My summer at GQ

1

Tell us about the application process. What sort of opportunities are available, and how did you find out about them?

Every Condé Nast magazine has a very slightly different system in place for work experience applicants; for example, Vogue has an official work-experience application process which even includes an interview. For most of the other magazines at Condé Nast, however, the best way to apply is to send your CV and cover letter through the post and address it to anyone on the team who seems to be in a suitable position to grant you a work experience. In the case of GQ, I sent in my CV by email and by post to various people. They’re much more likely to be interested in you if it arrives in a hard copy, on their desks.

What was the most difficult part of your internship?

Like all internships, the most difficult part of a Condé Nast internship is getting exactly what you want from it. I was on the Online Team at GQ but I already knew that journalism was not what I wanted to do; much rather, I was interested in shoot production, direction and magazine design. I got to know people in the design direction team, and after the Artistic Director asked to see my portfolio, I was asked to take part in several shoots and projects as a creative assistant. Towards the end of my internship, I was appointed as the Assistant Producer for a Burberry shoot at Kew Gardens. Though I was only there for a short time gaining work experience, Condé Nast is an easy environment to flourish in if you know exactly what it is that you want, and if you’re willing to put in time and effort. It can be difficult to locate what it is that you want when you start a new work experience, and even more difficult to achieve that aim, but the important thing is to try—and when you don’t succeed, to keep trying. At the end of the day, you don’t have anything to lose!

What’s working ‘on set’ like?

 

Working on set is a mixture of high stress and being extremely chilled out; it can go from absolute havoc, to total calm, to complete mayhem again. What people don’t realise is that the majority of the work happens before the shoot happens, and once you’re on set, it’s just a matter of making sure everything runs smoothly- often, there are things we don’t remember to take into account; such as a high tide during a shoot at the beach for instance! When we were at Kew Gardens, the biggest issue was making sure no one took photos of us shooting. The winter Burberry collection was under strict embargo until London Fashion Week, and keeping eager tourists at bay was a challenge, to say the least. I also spent one of the most uncomfortable hours of my life in the upstairs rafting of the main glasshouse at Kew. It was already 30 degrees that day, but inside and upstairs, it was pushing 40 degrees. We all emerged looking like we’d taken a shower in our clothes, and it was even worse for the poor model, who was wearing a jumper and a winter coat.

Highlight an opportunity or two that you especially enjoyed.

With the launch of the Night Tube in August, GQ magazine did a special online feature on the best 24 hour restaurants, bars and clubs around London. I was asked to take over the GQ snapchat and Instagram to document my first ever Night-Tube-Night-Out, using GQ’s list of restaurants and clubs as guidance. Bringing two friends of mine along with me, we contacted the restaurants and clubs in advance and received V.I.P treatment everywhere we went. This included free dining at SWAY night club, unlimited cocktails and free champagne at breakfast atop the famous Duck & Waffles restaurant overlooking London, just as the sun came over the horizon.

There were other cool experiences too, such as meeting Joe Jonas for our Facebook Live at Euston Tower, or being on-set with Alfie Allen. Towards the end of the month, the Online Team also asked me to conduct some interviews for them; I interviewed Jack Savoretti and AlunaGeorge.

Instagram seemed to play a big part in your cataloguing your experiences. Could you talk to us about the place of social media in journalism?

Instagram is one of the most important media platforms in the fashion industry because it remains entirely visual. Images generally appeal to people a lot more than words and I do think that Instagram will play an increasingly important role in journalism. Just one example of that is the way it is becoming an ever expanding online catalogue of pictures for anyone’s consumption and copyright remains ambiguous. The important thing to always bear in mind is that, unlike Facebook, anyone can access your account from Google. You should always be careful to remember your potential audiences when you upload images, but equally, play the internet at its own game; use it as an opportunity to show off your work. You’d be surprised at the amount of freelance work you can get just from people coming across your Instagram.

What would you conclude about the experience overall?

Overall, though it was really fun, the environment is quite stressful and fast-paced. There was a lot of work to do and it would often extend beyond the 9-6 office hours; the difference from most other places I suppose, is that every task changes from the last. Condé Nast is an exciting place to work for this reason; every day is different and fun.

What advice would you give to those looking to get involved in similar internships?

Be an opportunist. Never turn opportunities for experience down, no matter how small. Get involved in student journalism, but don’t limit yourself to a single publication. Try your hand out at everything from news, to comment, to fashion, and if you can, get involved in creative projects too.

Inspired by Christina’s interview to learn more about the fashion industry, but unsure about where to begin? How about lunch with one of the most connected women in the industry? Check out the Cherwell Fashion Writing Competition here.

 

Review: After the Poet, the Bar

0

TOver the summer, Lady Margaret Hall student Ben Ray released After the Poet, the Bar, his first full poetry collection, and one billed as “a loving exploration of Ben’s home in the Welsh borders”. It might seem strange, then, that the first poem pivots round the Mutiny on the Bounty, half a world away, and the second, an inclement Edinburgh. Not a Welsh border in sight. Except, of course, it’s not strange or slightly out of place because this collection has no geographical bounds, but is, as its eponymous verse which comes tucked away in the last few pages reminds us, an opportunity to have “lit another”, or as I’d like to think Ray means, to communicate to the reader his sheer joy for poetry. And he really does: reflective, self-consciously beautiful poetry (see ‘Rain Clouds Over Edinburgh’ or ‘Twin Ambitions’) bounces off dark poetic barbs (his send up of Simon Armitage is sublime) and pithy, playful poetic-jokes. Taken together, the collection becomes less a reflection than a celebration of poetry and, most powerfully, the role of the poet in itself.

His compositions are fluid, easy reads – so easy, in fact, that you could read the whole collection through, as I, though loath to admit it, did first time round, without pause to reflect on the precision of the diction. Lines like “A nucleus compressed to a dot / by the clear cobalt around it, tight embrace, / held by the brilliant blue of a billion atoms…” is ostensibly ‘pretty’: the image of life bursting forth even at a sub-atomic level. But it becomes ever more tremendous on second glance. “Tight embrace” is itself enclosed by the expansive azure; “nucleus” becomes “a billion atoms” – the vastness of life is reduced and exploded simultaneously, with the components of being broken into the smallest parts then multiplied and multiplied so the smallest of creatures becomes giant.

On a less quantum note, After the Poet, the Bar is echt-Oxonian in what it describes, and how it describes it. Ray’s homage or two-fingers-up to the tutorial system is suitably erudite in subject matter – clearly he’s paid attention from time to time – and in its deliberate, desperate wittiness: the strained intellectual one-upmanship familiar to anyone who’s ever had a precocious (and better prepared) tute partner. It is difficult to put it better than Nancy Campbell’s praise of Ben’s “canny understanding of life and language”, because this is his fundamental strength; in After the Poet, the Bar, life and language are so intertwined that to delight in one, is to delight in the other.

Poetry as a necessity and a joy

0

Poetry is not celebrated as a hangover cure. When National Poetry Day fell, as ever, mid-Freshers’ Week, it was likely a glass of water and the toilet bowl you were desperately reaching for to get you through the day, not a volume of contemporary poetry. You may also have missed the twenty-fifth awarding of the Forward Prizes last month: a celebration of poetry as a necessity and a joy. The poems honoured at the prize ceremony seemed so necessary—for not forgetting, for sharing strength and for re-drafting a depleted public language: poems that made me feel, for a moment, that everything hinged on their existence. But they also chimed perfectly with William Carlos Williams’ saying, “if it ain’t a pleasure, it ain’t a poem.” Perhaps not for hangovers, then—this poetry is strong stuff .

The judges shortlisted poems for Best Single Poem that “resonated…lingered…were fresh”. I think they’re better described by these lines from Sasha Dugdale’s winning poem, ‘Joy’: “All of them righter than the rightest calculation / And truer than any compass / Yet where they were right and true none could say / And how they were right and true none could guess”. The chosen poems were long: Rachel Hadas’s ‘Roosevelt Hospital Blues’, rhyming with such deceptively regular honesty; Melissa Lee-Haughton’s ‘i am very precious’, a poem so unfazed and preciously pronounced, about enjoying and fearing sex. Though near-impossible to compare, something about Dugdale’s poem stood out. Perhaps it was her obvious awareness that writing can be a matter of “tending” a poem, just as Catherine Blake – widow of William and the speaker of ‘Joy’ – says of their collaborative art, “I tended that light”.

Dugdale has said that “tending poetry is still harder for women, who are often juggling jobs and being carers”. Given that, what an astonishing year for women poets it’s been. Of the fifteen nominees, eleven were women, and all three winners female. Much of the evening’s memorable verse was concerned with Considering the Women—the title of Choman Hardi’s book, shortlisted for Best Collection. Ruby Robinson, in the running for First Collection, read ‘My Mother,’ about a woman who had missed out on so much because of damage done to her by others. I was rooting for Ron Carey, an Irish poet who made the shortlist for First Collection aged sixty-seven. Carey’s ‘Upstairs’ – also about a mother – felt so important when read aloud, but also had me desperate to follow the lines on the page: “So light. Oh! Sarah you are SO light. I carry her. / Up.” I wasn’t the only one crying. But it was the bizarre balance of cynicism and optimism in lines like “Loving a spouse […] is like praising One God, whom you will betray” from Tiphanie Yanique’s Wife that took the prize for Best First Collection.

The poems were many-tongued, not only in drawing on Scots and Caribbean dialects, but in transforming stale or standardised language. Harry Giles’ collection, Tonguit, includes a poem that replaces the word “terrorism” with “love” in a speech by David Cameron. Denise Riley hammers words into new expressions in a different way, for the deadly commonplace of bereavement, since ‘Death makes dead metaphors revive’, as the death of her adult son has taught her.

Riley’s Say Something Back, Alice Oswald’s Falling Awake and Vahni Capildeo’s Measures of Expatriation, the stand-out volumes on the Best Collection shortlist, all strengthened my belief in the importance of reading a poem aloud. Riley hears something back by the way she speaks and sings to the dead, “unquiet as a talkative ear.” Oswald’s “sound carvings” emerge from a process that she has compared to erosion or excavation—as if something is already there—to become meticulously timed oral performances. Vahni Capildeo won the big prize, for Best Collection—to my surprise, but my delight in hindsight. Capildeo talks about the musicality created not only by reading aloud, but also by intermingling poetry and prose: how the lines turn on themselves differently when given space. Her description of her work as infused with “coexistent distance-in-presence, presence-in-distance” sounds wishy-washy, until she clarifies this as typical of electronic communication today – and until you read her book. In ‘Investigation of Past Shoes’, she writes, “Sitting next to someone can make my feet curl: shy, self-destructive and oyster-like, they want to shuck their cases […] little undersea pinks’. Capildeo’s collection is definitely a shoe to wear in.

Why does sport matter?

0

The world is a largely depressing place. With humans plagued by a chronic awareness of the futility of their own existence, it is a difficult battle to find purpose and drive in an increasingly broken world. As we roll into autumn and a new academic year, bickering from Hilary and Trump reverberates menacingly from across the pond. Over a summer which was largely characterised by the lies and cries of that election campaign, the commotion of Brexit and the continued crisis in Syria, people could be forgiven for wanting to hide away from the front pages and the reality that lies in front of us.

In many ways what sport provides is an escape to an alternate reality; a crucial comfort and vital distraction from life. The importance of sport in this sense was first brought to my attention when hearing how the 3pm football scores provided weekly warmth to a friend, who found alleviation in the very fact that the football was still going on, asit had for the preceding century and a half, enjoying the comforting knowledge that the world, therefore, still must be spinning.

An even starker example of this powerful role that sport plays was beautifully captured the night of the Paris attacks by Robert Wilson, a man caught up in the attacks, who found solace in watching Australian test cricket while under threat in the 10th arrondissement; “It was something about the Australian sunlight, its promiscuous optimism. And the sheer, pointless beauty of cricket. It felt like life, being thoroughly and joyously lived. I’m depending on it tonight. It’s what we do when you feel hemmed in by life’s opposite.”

In our alternate sporting reality villains still exist, but villains that we love to hate, not ones that reign terror over societies, cultures and nations as has happened in the real world throughout the course of time. Hence, when the evils of the real world do spill over into the parallel sporting universe, take for example the Russian doping scandal or the current football manager bribery allegations, it is met with such widespread outpouring of negative uproar.

The key to the beauty of sport in this sense is its triviality. We are always trying to simplify, quantify and break down life, and in many ways the highly structured winner or loser nature of sports satisfies our basic primal instincts. This triviality and simplicity also creates a package that can be vigorously enjoyed on various levels by all members of society irrespective of age, gender, race or education. All sports are there to be enjoyed, it is just an unwillingness to understand the rules and principles of the game before them which prevents individuals from deriving any viewing pleasure from them. It’s for this reason most people’s favourite sport to watch is also the sport they are most talented at; a greater appreciation of the game and its subtleties heightens what can be taken from the viewing experience.

Sport is not only to be enjoyed in the present, but also helps you remember the past. Nothing runs the continuum of existence the way sport does. Music, drama and art is often appreciated for being timeless, transcending eras and generations; whereas a sporting event simply takes place during one moment of history, and then from that moment forward is bound to it, with memories of the two constantly evoking and fortifying one and other. The past is largely all we have in life, previous actions turned memories which define the present. Memory is a complex phenomenon, and not one as accurate as you may think. Large swathes of life pass by, now impossible to recollect, other parts largely distorted by the passing of time and confused similar experience. Recalling and revisiting previous sporting moments can help unlock involuntary memories of the past; doing semi-naked laps of the garden as Leeds beat Arsenal to secure survival in May 2003, tasting my first glass of champagne as England won the Rugby World Cup over breakfast at my grandparents a few months later or sobbing uncontrollably to my mum when the Athens Olympics finished in 2004 all bring back so much more and are so crucial in preserving precious remembrance of my primitive years.

That’s why sport matters to me. Not only can it be beautifully enjoyed in the present, but it helps you remember when you need to remember and helps you forget when you need to forget.

Enjoy the column, J.

Preview: A Clockwork Orange

0

If you’re the kind of person who is happy resting on your laurels, then this probably isn’t the play for you. However if you feel like being shaken up then read on to discover the world of philosophical violence that Director Jonny Dancginer and his cast bring to life in this adaption of the infamous modern classic, A Clockwork Orange.

Walking in to the rehearsal room I am not quite sure what to expect, blood? Fight scenes? Torture? I only know that if this production is anything like Barricade Arts’ version of Mercury Fur then it’s going to be good, and they’re not going to pull their punches. And I’m right about one thing, this cast are good. Coming off the back of a run of London performances they are well-rehearsed and know their characters inside out.

As I sit down and begin talking with Dancigner I quickly realise that I am in for a treat. And as the preview scenes begin and the Beethoven swells I marvel at how this company have turned the glorification of violence into an art form – the choreographed fight scene seems more like a piece of dance than a brawl. And yet Dancigner seems keen to shift the focus away from A Clockwork Orange’s traditional themes of the male gaze and adolescent violence and more towards the systemised violence of the play. Gender blind casting means that we can expect scenes traditionally associated with male violence to make more general statements about the role of violence within society. Faceless Clockwork automatons bring issues of free will and personal responsibility into sharp focus and lend a threatening air of impending mechanisation to the play, making the characters who use violence to rebel seem all the more vital in comparison.

As the play progresses we see a shift in Alex’s character (played by Gerard Krasnopolski) from perpetrator of violence to victim of it. With this shift we see the performance of violence move from the physical to the psychological. Dancigner takes audience empathy to the extreme in his decision to represent Alex’s conditioning through sound, so that the violence moves from visual representation on the stage into our own heads as the extent of the violence is left for us to imagine, and we become complicit in it.

Talking with the cast after these scenes I am struck by something Natalie Lauren (playing Georgie and Brodsky) says, that we have to question whether or not the aesthetic value of something is affected by its moral status. This production boldly takes something we generally find abhorrent, sets it Beethoven, and makes it beautiful. It’s guaranteed to make you feel uncomfortable and to make you question your own morality and your position as an observer of this (albeit acted) violence. I am still haunted by the question of what it means to find aesthetic pleasure in such a brutal fictional world.

Just before I leave Dancigner tells me that although he always wants his cast to be comfortable in what they’re doing, he hopes to “traumatise the audience”. I must be a masochist because far from putting me off this makes me immediately go and buy a ticket.

A play with a clear vision, a strong cast, and creative staging choices, A Clockwork Orange is a must-see performance.

Popular principal of Somerville to retire

1

Dr Alice Prochaska, the principal of Somerville College, will step down at the end of the academic year, as a result of a college statute which prevents people over the age of seventy from holding the position.

Dr Prochaska, known by Somerville students as ‘Ali P’, has served a seven-year term in which the college’s endowment has almost doubled, the college revealed in an online statement.

The latest project announced under her watch is the Margaret Thatcher Scholarship Trust, which awards a tuition fee grant and free accommodation to two students with exceptional prelims results.

But due to college rules, which limit tenure to those younger than 65 with a maximum extension of five years, Dr Prochaska’s seventieth birthday will end her contract.

“According to our statues, the Principal cannot continue to serve beyond the age of 70”, a Somerville spokesperson told Cherwell.

“In fact, Alice Prochaska signed a contract for seven years, which takes her up to the prescribed retirement age.”

Finn Strivens, a Somerville third year, said, “I’m shocked and appalled. She is the loveliest person alive, and makes a huge effort with every individual student”.

Alex Crichton-Miller, JCR President, said, “We in the JCR are certainly sad that such a wonderful Principal has decided to move on. We can only hope that the college will find a replacement as considerate towards the JCR and as ambitious for the college as a whole.”

Dr Prochaska began her career at Somerville, where she read for a BA and DPhil in Modern History, and went on to publish a number of books on British trade unions, reform movements and the city of London, before working as a museum curator and an archivist.

During the 1990s, Dr Prochaska was a convener of a research seminar on Contemporary British History, served as a Vice President of the Royal His- torical Society, a governor of London Guildhall University and Chair of the National Council on Archives.

Before becoming principal of Somerville in September 2010, she then worked on the government committee that designed the first National Curriculum for History, and as Yale’s University Librarian.

In 2015, she led an exposé of sexual harassment, groping and rape jokes in Oxford, prompting an unopposed JCR motion that donated £200 to Oxford Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Centre. She made a variety of public appearances highlighting rape culture and the prominence of homophobia amongst university students.

Somerville’s website describes Dr Prochaska as “well known for her open informal approach and concern for the welfare of students and staff.”

Other major achievements of her time at Somerville include a doubling of the number of graduate students to more than 150, and the opening of student accommodation at the Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, called “one of the most significant development projects…in more than a century”. In her time as principal, Somerville has increased its accommodation to house all undergraduates and first-year graduate students.

“She’s always super lovely and she’ll be greatly missed as a friendly face around college”, Robin Leach told Cherwell.

“I had one meeting with her as a fresher, which started as a somewhat daunting meeting with the principal, but quickly became a pleasant chat with a very amiable woman. Whoever succeeds her will have big shoes to fill.”

The college has begun recruitment for her successor, who is expected to be announced in early 2017. It did not specify whether it would seek an internal or external applicant for the role, but those considering it are encouraged to contact Dr Curly Maloney.

After leaving Somerville, Dr Prochaska hopes to continue with her historical work on heritage collections and their link to national identity.

St Benet’s welcomes female undergraduates for the first time

0

St Benet’s Hall has taken in its first mixed gender cohort of undergraduates this week, after deciding to admit female students in 2013. Previously, the last college to go co-educational was St Hilda’s, admitting men in 2008.

Female graduate students were admitted in 2014, while the Permanent Private Hall awaited separate accommodation to become available to house new female undergraduates. New facilities were deemed necessary, due to the six monks who are part of the Hall and live on site.

St Benet’s, which has just under 50 undergraduates, has now acquired a second site next to University Parks, allowing for the completion of its co-educational admissions this year.

JCR President Samuel Hodson commented, “Having already accepted graduate women, I am delighted that St Benet’s is welcoming undergraduate women to the Hall this year. Everyone is excited to be extending our unrivalled sense of community to the new members; things are well underway with women making up half of the undergraduate intake this year.”

Until 2012, the master of Benet’s was always a Benedictine monk, and the hall retains a monastic prior and a chaplain, both of whom are monks. Students do not have to be Catholics, but all are asked to be supportive of monastic life and values.

Enthusiasm for the occasion extends throughout the Hall, with the Senior Tutor, Dr Santha Bhattarcharji, telling Cherwell, “We are all delighted to be welcoming our first mixed undergraduate intake, and everything seems to going well so far.”

Kelly Carleton, the student Women’s Officer at the Hall, told Cherwell, “The St. Benet’s ethos is one of community and egalitarianism, so it has been exciting to continue this spirit in welcoming undergraduate women this year.

“This is an historic moment for the Hall, and yet I have been pleased with how natural the transition has been. I am looking forward to seeing where this integrated student community leads St. Benet’s in the future.”

Alice Gent, one of the nine female freshers at Benet’s, said, “I Googled it and I was terrified. I looked at it and it was all male until this year, it’s got a history of being incredibly conservative, it’s got one of the highest numbers of Bullingdon Club membership and I was like ‘I’m a left- wing leaning female young person, I’m going to hate it’. I honestly thought I should go to Durham instead.

“But it’s so much more welcoming than other colleges, I’ve got a friend at another college and they’ve only hung out with the freshers. But ours is so small, you communicate with all of the years. There’s so much more mixing, with postgrads as well.” Eleanor Lambert, another first-year at St Benet’s, said, “all of the 18 undergrads are living in their own building in Norham Gardens, so it’s kind of like being in a house with 17 other people.

“I had a quick tour before my pooled interview, and the guy kept saying that it wouldn’t be a typical Oxford experience, and at the time, I just wanted the typical experience. Actually, the nice thing is it’s small enough that everyone knows everyone.”

Mortar found in Christ Church meadow

0

A military mortar was discovered in Cherwell River, in Christ Church Meadow, by two teenage boys on a fishing trip.

A member of the public alerted the police at 3:46pm yesterday, and the mortar was destroyed at 5pm today.

A large area around the site, including much of Christ Church Meadow, was closed off but has now been reopened.

Investigating officer Ch Supt Andy Boyd, head of Thames Valley Neighbourhood Policing, said: “I am very grateful to the members of the public who helped to share our appeal, and for spreading the message about this incident.

“I am also grateful to the two boys who helped us locate this item and ensure that it was safe and that no members of the public are at risk.

“I understand that some people who wished to use the park today have been inconvenienced, and I would like to thank them for their ongoing understanding and patience.”

Multiple rowing taster sessions were disrupted today as a result of the closure.

Cherwell Film School: Telling a story

0

A bad story can never be saved, not even by the biggest of budgets. As basic as it may seem—the story of a film is its most important element. Film theorist, Greg Smith, argues that this is because the story is the appeal of a film. In his publication of ‘An Invitation to Feel’ on cognitivism and film, Smith asserts that “Films are objects that are well constructed to elicit a real emotional response from our already existing emotion systems.” Stories are the referential point of film, a good story says something in a coherent and human way in order to relate to real experiences. As much as cinematography and score, or performance and veracity of VFX appear to contribute to our opinion of a film – what really appeals is how they’ve been effectively deployed in the direction of a certain narrative to support and enhance its emotional triggers.

The digital age has unfortunately cultivated an over-reliance on medium rather than content–cinemas are jamp-packed with high-grosssing, high visual quality films that have no point of access and are rather there for escapist and voyeuristic enjoyment. Recent experimental film-makers have been acting in protest of this by making films on lower-budget material. Most famously, the award-winning film Tangerine that screened in 2015, with 97% on Rotten Tomatoes, was shot on an iPhone 5. Director Sean Baker said that he preferred his focus and time to the purpose and motion of his camera rather than the brand of lens he should use.

Troublingly telegenic: Oxford in film

0

Transformers: The Last Knight was being filmed in Oxford last month. In a franchise where mega-robots and casual sexism dominate, it might seem incongruous that Michael Bay’s latest assault found its temporary home in a city known for learning and prestige. However, the fact that Bay used Churchill’s old home as Nazi HQ reveals a trend in how blockbusters use Oxford: its beautiful buildings are easy props. For a lazy director, there is no need to engage with their actual history or current purpose. Instead, Oxford is useful visual shorthand, its iconic look signalling history and status. However, films using Oxford for their own creative backdrop are always simultaneously re-shaping public perception, and not necessarily in a true or constructive way.
Back in 2011, X-Men: First Class used the city to develop the character of their protagonist. We get as much of a sense of James McAvoy’s Charles Xavier from the Turf-esque student pub he frequents and the external view of the Sheldonian as we do from the script itself. By showing the mind-reading superhero as a part of this environment, it is made clear that he is intelligent, talented and deeply immersed in the comfortable world of academia. However, the flipside of the dreaming spire is the ivory tower, beautiful yet blithe. Oxford helps to portray Xavier as extraordinary but wilfully detached from the world around him. Direction that utilises ‘impact’ shots to lazily deploy Oxford grandeur is harmfully short-sighted in its’ depiction of the city. It shows snippets of ‘impact’ Oxford, rather than carefully considering its complexity. It seems that our university is uniquely effective in indicating personal brilliance alongside being happily oblivious about real life. Although not an unfair point, ‘embracing’ this presentation cultivates and justifies Oxford as the impenetrable tower of the intellectual rather than the diverse city it is and the accessible institution it needs to be.
Sweeping shots of the city are also employed in a 2011 hit you are less likely to be familiar with, the Hindi spectacular Desi Boyz. Equally as ridiculous as a Transformers film but with more dancing, Desi Boyz uses Oxford to illustrate the zero-to-hero path of a former male escort—Bollywood never disappoints. However in Desi Boyz, as with X-Men, Oxford’s image is one harmfully stuck in the past. The extras used as the ‘backdrop’ of Oxford are swathes of Caucasian figures in bland clothing. Diversity at the institution of Oxford is an issue—such subconscious re-enforcements of it allows it to go uncritisized. The implication is that, however well-regarded Oxford is, it is ultimately a place of tradition, and this makes sobriety and staidness inevitable, perhaps discouraging the large majority from finding a place for themselves at the University.
This reaches its nadir in Lone Scherfig’s 2012 film The Riot Club, which returns the Bullingdon club to its ancestral playground. The Riot Club has good intentions, engaging with legitimate issues of classism and elitism in Oxford, but executes this intent badly, as it is completely out of touch with the reality of how these problems form. Perhaps the university itself needs to change, before we can start looking at it from a new angle? But perhaps it will only begin to evolve when we aim the camera towards the more honest every day corners of the university and the city at large, to see it from a perspective that places it as a part of a larger world – rather using its traditionalism for grand symbols and gestures.