Monday, May 5, 2025
Blog Page 1062

Review: Choir of Young Believers – Grasque

0

★★★★☆

Best known for their previous album Rhine Gold, which was used as the soundtrack for hit TV show The Bridge, Choir of Young Believers’ have released their fifth album, Grasque.

Initially the record seems to include Rihanna-like RnB beats alongside Eno-esque synth transitions. On fifth track ‘Græske’, Jannis Noya Makrigiannis’ vocals take on an ethereal, raga-like chant. Makrigiannis hails from Copenhagen and thought up much of this album on a Swedish farm with producer Aske Zidore. Yet this album is not restricted by landmass.

Instead, the tracks weave a complex web of sound. What should be grimy beats quickly morph into emotive chimes, and a sound that is at one time hauntingly chapel-like rapidly morphs into urban roughness.

With song titles ranging from ‘The Whirlpool Enigma’ to ‘Olimpiyskiy’, Grasque is expansive and all-encompassing. While tracks are not immediately distinguishable from others, the textural development of each alone – particularly ‘Does It Look As If I Care’ and ‘Jeg Ser Dig’ – is astounding. These songs mutate from piano-led smoky jazz to ambient synth work. Makrigiannis’ voice has a sensitivity rare to find in serious male musicians without it taking on a wussy, frail tone.

Hardly an album of party bangers, this record is saturated in complexity and nuance, requiring several listens before you feel you can even begin to grapple with the sound.

This World Lousy: this musical not

0

On stage from 27th-30th January, Peter Shepherd’s musical This World Lousy was a fascinating blend of two styles originally based on the same concept. The director, Maya Ghose, will also be taking part in the production of Andrew Lloyd-Webber’s Phantom of the Opera later this term.

While both operas and musicals use music and songs to convey emotions, this new creation explores the limits of these narrative systems. The main character, who remains anonymous just like the others throughout the two hour-long performance, is a fugitive mainly expressing his hopes and doubts according to the opera technique. Sung and acted out by Aaron King, he dialogues with the choir and a few other characters who spontaneously detach themselves from this generally hostile group, similar to a Greek chorus.

These exchanges oscillate between growing tension, reflected in the way the orchestra’s theme is gradually played at higher and higher notes, and moments of relief. A young orphan’s clear soprano voice stands out as being particularly cheerful, as the atmosphere switches to a suddenly more optimistic mood. Most singers have their own solo, and a set of easily memorised themes is developed through the musical to make this a varied yet coherent work. For instance, the trumpet’s tune can be noticed from the very beginning, but evolves to become associated with the sound of a police car, a worrying signal for a fugitive.

Overall, the storyline and definition of the characters appear to follow the structure of traditional tales, though the absence of names and the notion of doubt echo the music by plunging the audience into a world of ambiguity.

As is mostly the case for good musicals, the music conjures up clear images to accompany the drama on stage. More originally, music director Peter Shepherd choose to write the score of This World Lousy for a full symphonic orchestra, bringing in impressive power in the fight scenes to which unexpected instants of silence respond. The entire musical is in fact built around contrasts. A chaotic effect is produced when the tenor singer’s long, melodic phrases are opposed to the orchestra’s inten tionally dissonant staccato marked by the cello, a clear counterpoint to the audience’s expectations.

Peter Shepherd draws on modern music’s characteristics to create his own intriguing blend of thought-provoking performance and striking combinations. Opposing groups of actors and singers to individuals both visually and musically, This World Lousy moves from the darkness and drama of self-questioning to a positive comment on the potential of our world.

How beneficial is music streaming?

0

Tidal, Spotify, Apple Music. Music streaming has taken off in recent years, with another huge name recently added to the bill. But with icons like Adele and Taylor Swift rejecting their invites to the streaming party, seeds of doubt have been sown: just how beneficial are streaming services to the music industry?

As all of us old-souls out there, still wearing faded band t-shirts with pride would agree, one detrimental effect of online music streaming is the steady decline of vinyl and CD sales. After all, legends like The Rolling Stones and David Bowie were not made on the internet. What is now seen as the old-fashioned way of listening to music is in danger of extinction, a fact staunchly highlighted by HMV’s demise in 2014. It is no wonder that musical royalty such as Adele actively refuse to feed the streaming machine.

When asked why her new album 25 would not be made available on Spotify, the singer replied, “There are kids I know who are, like, nine who don’t even know what a fucking CD is!” I salute you, Adele, especially since you obviously don’t need Spotify’s assistance; the album sold 800,000 copies in the UK in its first week of release. Many of us will add it to our vinyl displays in a show of solidarity.

Before taking her catalogue off Spotify and refusing rights to Apple Music, Taylor Swift raised another question about the growing popularity of online streaming in a piece she wrote for the Wall Street Journal. Swift wants to “keep art valuable,” declaring that “music should not be free.” This is an admirable ideology, but with more artists making their music free and available (the entire Beatles discography is now on Spotify) the ‘Tidal’ wave created by digital music is becoming impossible to withstand for both consumer and industry.

I should point out that huge names like Adele and Swift can easily afford (in every sense of the word) to reject Spotify and Apple. But what about the yet unheard-of artists trying to find their feet in this cut-throat industry? Even Hozier – an internationally-acclaimed artist with two Billboard Music Awards under his belt – started off on the BBC ‘Introducing’ Stage at Glastonbury in 2014. If, therefore, streaming is a way for independent musicians to make a name for themselves, then surely it is the way forward, the very future of the music industry? As much as I grit my teeth in saying it, it’s time to face the future. Or rather the music. Just like virtually every other entertainment industry, music is becoming part of the online world and this is not an entirely bad thing. The future of music is in the hands of the artists. How can they attempt to change the world if they’re still stuck in a basement making their own cover art?

La Dolce Vitae

0

Watches: Vitae London

Nails: Brothers Oxford

Photographer: Ian Wallman

Location: The Varsity Club

Creatives: Kim Darrah – Ella Harding – Harry Sampson

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12831%%

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12832%%

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12821%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12822%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12823%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12824%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12825%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12826%% 

 %%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12827%%

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12828%% 

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12829%% 

 %%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12830%%

%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12818%%

Spotlight: Why Monochrome?

0

Recently, I have been getting an absolute earful from my editors. It is very important for a student newspaper to look interesting and aesthetically engaging – you need bold colours and striking shapes. As a stage editor, I have very limited responsibility; we just have to fill a single page with previews and reviews and a slightly self-indulgent opinion piece. However, despite the relatively small amount of content we have to produce, we find ourselves struggling desperately to find the very smallest splash of colour in the monochrome wasteland of minimalist rehearsal and production pictures. Posters and marketing have tended in recent weeks towards the increasingly impactful and hard-hitting, but even then they lack that splash of colour that my elders and betters at this newspaper so desperately yearn for.

The real culprit in the endless arms race which will inevitably lead this page towards a singularity-esque absence of any light whatsoever comes from rehearsal pictures.

Look, we get it, the pure emotive power of this production is absolutely unparalleled. It can and will make you think about your life in ways which you could never have even conceived of before you went to see it. If we take that as read vis-aÌ€-vis all of Oxford drama, will you please, for the love of God, stop making all of your production pictures black and white?

I’ve been looking back through every single production photo that [email protected] has ever been sent by a marketing manager, a producer or very keen cast member, and I found literally one single colour photograph (I’ll let you guess which one it was, but it might be just a few inches to the right of where your eyes are currently directed). I know it isn’t really any of my business, and we’re merely here to provide the legions of merry punters with informed opinions about Oxford drama, but please can we get some more colour photos?

Better-meta-theatre

0

Stoppard’s classic Shakespearean pastiche is a fascinating look at the essential mysteries of human existence. Delivered with both comedy and severity and theatrical in-jokes throughout, it’s the comedy of menace at its best.

What is our purpose? Are we free? Is meaningful communication possible? What does it mean to possess an ‘identity’? All these questions and more are brought to the fore in this intriguing existentialist comedy (a little oxymoronic, I know). Plot-wise, this play is, to say the least, perplexing, focusing on the lives of two side characters from Hamlet; and their attempts to work out whether he is mad or not. This plot runs concurrently to the original main plot of Hamlet, allowing for complex jokes on theatre and audience involvement (which is cleverly used throughout) and also numerous references to Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and the philosophers Sartre and Camus. These jokes then tie back into the original thematic content – one of the players from the original Hamlet appears throughout the play, once berating Rosencrantz and Guildenstern for not watching their own performance. They proceed to comment: what is it to perform without being watched? Picking up on both theatrical and philosophical concerns, then, is something that this play is about to the core.

The dialogue throughout is fast paced, witty, and intricate. In one particularly notable scene, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern play a game of questions which makes them question their identity, their position and their place. The notion of whether Hamlet is in fact mad or not seems of cursory importance to the pair, as one asserts to the other he is sane, only to then re- ply later he doesn’t know. The characterisation of this lead pair is so subtly yet artfully done as to raise the question of whether they are not, in fact, flipsides of the same personality. Anger, witty sparring, humour, and a clear sense of brotherhood between the two: all give the appearance of a bizarre split personality.

The most profoundly moving moment, however, is Rosencrantz’s main speech. Commencing with what appears to be a serious reflection on death, this expectation of severity is then subverted by a joke that it is the idea of being boxed in rather than dying that scares him more. Yet then the speech mutates into an angry one on the futility of the human condition, revolting against his own mortality and sense of purposelessness. The acting made these philosophical ruminations seem all the more potent, making it transform from possibly pretentious posturings into deeply personal and universal fears about life and death. Ultimately, this play has yet another attraction to it, beyond the already impressive portrayal of a philosophically complex piece. Yes, dear reader, a certain member of the crew was heard saying in the smoking area at Cellar that this was “sort of the BNOC play for this term”. Who could resist checking out a play like that?

Interview: William Adoasi

0

Tell us a bit about your brand and what you do

Vitae London is a watch brand birthed out of London, England with a global reach. Our elegant yet simplistic watches can be worn all year round for any occasion and would suit anyone from the sophisticated city worker to the trendy hipster.

Why did you choose to name the company “vitae”?

Vitae simply means life and our vision as a brand is to create products that change lives and leave a lasting impact for generations to come. Every time a Vitae London watch is bought a child is supported through education for a year in Africa.

What was your inspirations behind the watch designs?

I’m inspired by the classic simplistic watch brands of yesteryear. I wanted to create a brand with the look and feel of these brands but at an accessible price point.

What are your plans for the company in the future?

Our immediate target for 2016 is to impact 1000 lives, the reports we hear of lives changed makes the work we do meaningful. In the future we are planning to expand our range of watches and research into other accessories.

What advice would you give someone who wanted to start a company in accessories?

The market is very saturated so make sure your product is meaningful and has a unique selling point. Researching the market and the key players is imperative.

What does a normal day look like as director/manager of a watch company?

Every single day for me is varied and unique, due to the fact we are within our first year of trading I’m having to constantly churn out new content and season specific campaigns. A lot of time is dedicated also to business development and ensuring I forge relationships with retail outlets both online and in store.

"I am back to save the universe"

0

It is hard to reconcile modern-day Radiohead with the band who marked their entrance with three vicious guitar blasts preceding the chorus of ‘Creep’ in 1992. Gone is lead singer Thom Yorke’s bleach blonde hair. Gone is the introspection. Gone, it could be argued, is the pop sensibility. But never has the ability to surprise and to subvert been stronger.

This is precisely what makes their impending return so very exciting. Unannounced artwork, in their distinctive, heavily abstract visual style, all inky blue atmosphere and soulless white figures, has made its way onto their official website. This, coupled with a spate of announcements of headline slots at festivals abroad, has signalled what we’ve known unofficially since 2014, when whispers of new studio sessions first reared their head: Radiohead is back.

But, of course, they never really left. Since their most recent album, The King of Limbs (2011), the Oxford-raised group have been individually rather busy. Thom Yorke casually formed the supergroup Atoms for Peace with some unknowns – namely Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers and Joey Waronker of Beck and R.E.M. fame. Oh, and he also released a second solo album, Tomorrow’s Modern Boxes, in 2014. The man is unbelievably prolific.

Furthermore, multi-instrumentalist Jonny Greenwood has, through his eclectic collaborations with director Paul Thomas Anderson on The Master (2012) and Inherent Vice (2014), established himself as one of the most dynamic film composers working in Hollywood today. To cap off a trinity of creatives, drummer Phil Selway also released his second solo album in 2014, entitled Weatherhouse. Take a moment to consider that embarrassing run of releases during your next essay crisis.

Then there’s the issue of a small indie film named Spectre and the resulting Bond theme controversy. After they were rejected by the infinitely wise studio heads at Sony in favour of Sam Smith – because obviously the concept of Radiohead recording a Bond theme wasn’t exciting enough – the band released the rejected track for free online on December 25th 2015. Some Christmas present. But even aside from its intrinsic value, ‘Spectre’ represents an interesting musical crossroads. The heavily syncopated, electronica-drenched sound of The King of Limbs, particularly lead single ‘Lotus Flower,’ seems to have been ditched in favour of grand instrumentation and a return to more emotive and personal lyrics. Granted, this is not the first time for Radiohead to switch up its style, aesthetically moulding themselves to a film to which they have attached their music (see the impeccable ‘Exit Music (For A Film)’ which closes Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet). But the question remains: just how far does this foreshadow whatever release is forthcoming next year?

To observe Radiohead historically, each album contains traces of the next within its sonic vocabulary. OK Computer was quite a departure from its exceptional, late 90s indie boom predecessor The Bends in that it shied away from the guitar-driven indie rock of their previous fame. That, of course, led to arguably their best work, and many fans’ (this one included) favourite album, Kid A, ditching the guitars almost entirely for a more synthetic musical landscape. This development has continued similarly up until today, when their impending sound is once more up in the air.

Though in some ways, the excitement stems from escalation. To chart Radiohead’s sonic development is akin to charting the development of any given top author, or filmmaker – each album becomes a statement of intent, and between each album lies new confidence, experiments and genres, which is precisely what makes them so immediate, and so wonderfully relished in the annals of indie rock.

For Radiohead to produce yet another LP which reaches the band’s impenetrably high standards seems impossible. But to quote the band themselves, “You can try the best you can / the best you can is good enough.” Go on, lads.

Chez Chaz: dairy-free risotto

0

I’ll let you in on a secret: I hate cheese. So, I often spend time trying to find ways of avoiding it. Risottos are renowned for their creaminess, but if you cook the rice right, you can achieve a texture that is just as silky and possibly more comforting than you get by adding dairy products.

Ingredients (serves 4)

Small handful dried porcini mushrooms

1 medium onion, finely chopped

1 clove of garlic, crushed

300g risotto rice (arborio or carnaroli)

1 cup white wine

750ml-1l vegetable stock (or chicken stock if you’re not going veggie)

300g mushrooms (I’d suggest chestnut but you can also get packets of wild mushrooms in Tesco which are nicer but fancier)

1 cup frozen peas Knob of butter (optional)

Parsley ½ lemon

Method

Add the porcini mushrooms to the stock you are using so that they can hydrate and infuse. Sweat the onions in a saucepan over a medium heat. When they have softened, add the garlic and cook for two minutes. Pour in the risotto rice and stir for another two minutes before pouring in the wine. Keep stirring the rice frequently.

Once the wine has been absorbed, pour in a ladle of the stock and keep stirring. As the liquid gets absorbed, you want to add the stock back so that it never gets dry but is never too wet. Season with salt and pepper, but be careful as stock can be quite salty.

You have a few options for cooking the mushrooms: if you’re using fancy wild mushrooms, I’d suggest you cook them separately from the risotto on a high heat in a frying pan for about 3-5 minutes and add them to the risotto right at the end. Add the frozen peas towards the end of the cooking. The rice will be cooked when it still retains a little bit of bite. Stop adding stock at this point and take it off the heat. Squeeze in the lemon juice and, if you’re not going vegan, you can add in a bit of butter. Garnish with parsley and serve.

Clunch review: Trinity

0

I’m not quite sure why they feel the need to have a suited and booted maître d’ to serve a group of hung(ove)ry students. Nor do I quite understand why there are six different types of cutlery on offer to eat the 11 different main options available. I mean, having four different veggie and even two vegan options is pretty impressive, but does anyone really need beef done three different ways (stir-fried, bourguignon and chilli)? It all seems a bit decadent, ridiculous and, well, frankly excessive.

Arriving near the end of lunch, I’m told that we’ll have the dregs of this superfluous feast. I opt to go for the fish Friday special, pan-fried John Dory fillet with salsa verde. Anything which even hints of individual preparation amongst the looming deep fat fryers of a college kitchen is bound to be good.

Wrong. Firstly, whoever thought that strip of fish could be given the title of ‘fillet’ must have been either a miser or completely blind. I’m hungry. I’m grumpy. I’m a finalist in need of fodder. My friend’s pork is piled up high on his plate, and I’m left with a goldfish. Secondly, ‘pan fried’ appears to have undergone a semantic shift since I last pored lovingly over the OED. There’s enough grease in my fish that it makes Hussein’s look like a salad bar. In fact, it’s all I can taste. Vastly disappointed, I move onto the salsa verde in the hope that my taste buds will have some reprieve. Call me a pleb, the northerner that I am, but I’m pretty sure a sauce or whatever the fuck salsa verde is meant to be is not meant to taste entirely of grease and vinegar. I mean, if you’re going to have 11 main options, at least get enough capers in your sauce to make it the flavour it is supposed to be.

Dessert, however, was alright. I don’t think anyone quite knew what it was, the staff telling me they “think it might be crumble.” Gooey and oaty, it at least filled some of the vast empty void left by my miserly, and rather expensive, portion of fish. Leaving at least slightly full, I take one last look at the endless sprawl of Trinity-emblazoned crockery and hope that next week’s clunch will leave me feeling less like I’d been to a failed upmarket bistro.