Sunday 12th April 2026
Blog Page 1113

Review: Victoria – the one-take film exhibits electric momentum

0

FIVE STARS

Sebastian Schipper’s Victoria is centred on two young twenty-somethings; the go-getting, exuberant Spanish girl Victoria (Laia Costa) and the local bruiser with swaggering charm Sonne (Frederick Lau). Their encounter begins under the lights of a subterranean techno club. Both are looking for something and seem to find it in each other. Over the course of one night we are invited to observe their burgeoning romance against the backdrop of a thriving, yet melancholic 4am West Berlin. Just as we are beginning to fall in love with this partnership, however, the film becomes less Before Sunrise (1995) and more Bonnie and Clyde (1967).  Sonne and his friends are petty criminals and the second act of the film takes the shape of a heart-stopping heist-thriller, with Victoria dragged along as the unlikely sidekick.

The themes present show continuity with the rest of Schipper’s filmography. All of his films explore relationships between several people during a crisis. Often an external event or influence pushes these relationships to the brink of destruction and viewers are compelled to see how the characters will react, which is certainly the case for Victoria. Schipper first hit the international film scene with his 1999 debut, Gigantics. It follows the story of a boy who decides to break out of his hopeless home town and travel the world, much to the disappointment, envy and confusion of his two best friends. The film similarly tracks changes in their group dynamic over the course of one night (but it’s no high-school romp like American Graffiti). In Schipper’s A Friend of Mine (2006), a type A and type B are forced to work together in a car rental agency. Viewers observe the co-workers progression from hatred to unconventional love. Sometime in August (2009) explores the lives of a happily married couple taken to hell and back by the return of estranged relatives. It is clear, then, that Schipper seeks to deal with and negotiate the human condition, particularly when it involves the development of relationships. Human drama is Schipper’s bag.

Victoria’s immersive qualities are largely down to the rich characterisations of the two leads. With a script made up of a meagre twelve pages, it is testament to the abundant talent of these actors, whose unwavering ingenuity manages to create two convincing, flawed and astoundingly real protagonists, all through heavy improvisation. Before the film catapults its viewers into a chaotic second half, a scene in the coffee shop at the nights supposed end is the moment everyone becomes invested in these two individuals. Victoria’s coy, playful mask slips as she grieves the death of her dream to be a professional pianist. Sonne is clearly spellbound yet nonetheless anguished by her sadness. From this moment on, viewers have no choice but to see how this one plays out. Lau and Costa have us in the palm of their hands and they don’t release us until the closing credits.

However, there is one giant leap of faith that Schipper decided to take with Victoria. This separates the film not only from his previous work, but from most of cinematic history itself. It forced him to unlearn everything learnt at film-school and to shake off all conventional impulses as a filmmaker. Schipper’s vision for Victoria, one that took five years to cultivate, was to capture the entire film in one single take.

Rather than drawing from previous examples – like Hitchcock’s Rope or Iñárritu’s Birdman – Schipper does not fool his audience. Hitchcock, for instance, would use darkness to cross-cut scenes. Birdman also was similarly tricksy with its camera and Iñárritu’s flashy CGI is a world away from the gritty realism of Victoria. Schipper cuts no such corners. The result of this DIY ethos is a raw, white-knuckle ride leaving viewers wondering what the fuck just happened, in the best possible sense.

But by God, it wasn’t an easy feat to pull off. The whole two hours and ten minutes was filmed in real time by cinematographer Sturla Brandth Grøvlen, who is unusually, yet deservedly, the first name we see when the credits roll.  Moving breathlessly across twenty locations, Grøvlen lugged five and a half kilos of camera equipment around the lamp-lit streets and dirty nightclubs of post-twilight West Berlin. He required weeks of back training and lifting to gather the stamina necessary for such a physically demanding challenge. Adding to this pressure was the fact that all of the cast and crew had only three chances at shooting the film using the long-take.

With so much at stake for everyone involved, it was inevitable that these anxieties would manifest somewhere in the filming process. Schipper has since commented on the unique, wild energy that characterised the set, telling The Guardian that he came at his crew with a ‘certain aggression’. This tension, the sense that everything could fall apart in a moment, is what allows the film to sustain such an electric momentum.

There are, however, points in the film where things feel a little muddled and some questions seem unresolved. Is this a suspense thriller about a heist or an arthouse exploration of young love? Why does Victoria keep making poor choices? What is Schipper really trying to say? Luckily, the dazzling craftsmanship of the cinematographer coupled with the effectiveness of the two leads means that it doesn’t really matter. Victoria is not perfect, and in an industry of big studios and even bigger budgets, its unapologetic messiness is half its charm. You readily overlook plot holes and plausibility to fully appreciate and immerse yourself in the sublime chaos.

This is more than a film; Victoria is a kinetic, almost transcendental journey through time and space, love and youth. And when the titular heroine wanders listlessly away from the fateful night, viewers also have to retreat back into their own reality… although it may take a while.

Mary Beard awarded Bodleian Libraries’ highest honour

0

Professor Mary Beard, chair of Classics at Cambridge and classics editor of the Times Literary Supplement, was awarded the Bodley Medal, the Bodleian Libraries’ highest honour on April 5, following a talk at the FT Weekend Oxford Literary Festival.

Beard, described as “a prodigious scholarly phenomenon” by Bodley’s Librarian Richard Ovenden, appeared to a full audience in the Sheldonian Theatre and talked about her life, work and role as a female academic.

Upon receiving the medal, Beard noted that she was “accepting this on behalf of myself and on behalf of the Romans”. She also commented that the Romans remain and should remain culturally relevant in Britain, and that she finds them to be “damn interesting”.

©Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford. Photography: John Cairns
©Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford. Photography: John Cairns

The Bodley Medal is awarded by the University of Oxford’s Bodleian Libraries to individuals who have made outstanding contributions to “the worlds in which the Bodleian is closely connected, including literature, culture, science and communication”.

Being the most recent recipient of the medal, Beard joins the likes of past winners such as physicist Stephen Hawking, inventor of the World Wide Web Sir Tim Berners-Lee and actor Alan Bennett.

Mary Beard 1
©Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford. Photography: John Cairns.

In her award citation, Beard is described as “a regular media commentator on both the modern and the ancient world”.  She is “well-known” for having her books and television documentaries on the classical period, such as the Wolfson Award-winning book Pompeii: The Life of a Roman Town, and the BBC television documentary series Pompeii and Meet the Romans with Mary Beard.

A delighted Beard told Cherwell, “It is a great thing to be awarded.

“I feel extremely honoured and, when I look at the past recipients, very humbled. I guess I must have grown up at last”.

Beard being awarded the medal was “note[d] with pleasure” by the Faculty of Classics of the University of Cambridge. Newnham College, which Beard is affiliated to, and the Cambridge University Classics Society were, however, unavailable for comment.

“As a colleague of mine once said, there’s nothing bad about catering to the nation’s curiosity. There’s a lot to be curious about the Romans. If you live in this country, I don’t think you have any choice about whether to be interested in the Romans. They’re underneath us. We’re walking around on top of them.”

St John’s through to the final of University Challenge

0

St John’s College have defeated the University of Liverpool in the semi-final of University Challenge. They will face Peterhouse, Cambridge in the final on Monday 18th April.

Establishing an initial 25 point lead, St John’s looked like they were well in control from the start. However a quick recovery from Liverpool on the subject of an Australian streaker saw them take the lead for the first third of the show. St John’s broke even at 40 points and just when it looked like St John’s was going to settle into one of their own characteristic streaks, Liverpool once again took the lead. Finally at 90 points all, John’s settled into winning form closing the show with 195 points to Liverpool’s 95. 

St John’s team have gone from strength to strength throughout the competition. The first round saw them more than double Bristol’s score. Since then, they have had two convincing wins against Queen’s University Belfast and Newcastle University and snatched victory from St Catherine’s College, Cambridge by 5 points.

However, St John’s are the distinct underdogs for the coming match having lost to Peterhouse in the quarter final 150-195.

Overall, Oxford have won University Challenge the most times. A victory for St John’s in the final would mark Oxford’s 16th win in 45 years, dwarfing Cambridge’s current total of 9 wins.

The winning Oxford team is comprised of Angus Russell (History and Modern Languages), Charlie Clegg (Theology), Dan Sowood (Chemistry) and Alex Harries (History).

Katherine Hodgson, second year undergraduate historian at St Hugh’s told Cherwell: “I’ve watched every episode so far. I’m a total fan girl for the Johns team – big fan of Harries, if they don’t win I’ll be down a load of money, bet most of this month’s student loan on them winning.”

Victory for the all-male St John’s team will not ease questions over sexism in University Challenge. At last year’s semi-final, Jeremy Paxman reignited the debate when he introduced both Oxford teams and declared he would ask the usual tough questions. “Few tougher, perhaps, than why on earth are there no women left in this stage of the competition?” This year follows the same broad pattern with the semi-finalists including 14 men and two women.

The final of University Challenge will air on BBC 2 at 20:00 next Monday. 

Fire reported in Balliol College

0

Balliol students were evacuated from the library and the college’s front quad was sealed off after four fire engines were called to Broad Street.

The incident occurred this morning outside Balliol’s underground IT room on the front quad facing Broad Street, resulting in a power cut across the college for several hours and the temporary closure of the college library and front entrance.

Firefighters on hand monitored basement windows to ensure smoke did not drift into Broad Street and gave the all clear shortly after they arrived, restoring access to the college and library and ending an afternoon of diverting procrastination for those revising for Finals. Four fire engines is the standard response for reports of fire in historical buildings such as those of the college.
 
Head Porter of the college, Ian Fifield, insisted the drama was nothing to worry about, telling Cherwell that “it was a potential fire, not a fire,” but gave no comment to further questioning. 
It is thought an electrical fault was responsible for the incident.

Man found murdered in his home on Iffley Road

0

A murder investigation has been launched into the death of 42-year-old Adrian Greenwood, who was found dead in the hallway of his home in East Oxford on Thursday.

Police were called to his three-storey property on Iffley Road at 3pm, after a cleaner found a man inside the hallway.

A post-mortem yesterday confirmed the cause of death as multiple stab wounds to the chest and neck.

Thames Valley Police believe these wounds were inflicted with a bladed object, but they are yet to recover a murder weapon.

They also believe that an altercation took place in the hallway of the house and that Mr. Greenwood died after a “vicious and sustained attack,” in which the offender may also have obtained injuries.

A 26-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder and is currently in custody.

An onlooker, who saw the arrest yesterday, told Cherwell, “I was walking up the high street at around 18:15 when I saw a small grey car barreling through the high speed with the car horn blaring, closely followed by a police car. Both cars were coming from Cowley. I walked past Quod a few minutes later and saw the two cars parked in the middle of the road. Two policemen, one plain-clothed, were speaking to a man who had a couple of bloody cuts across his cheek.”

Detective superintendent Chris Ward, head of Thames Valley Police major crime unit, commented, “We are keeping an open mind in terms of the motive and whilst we have already made an arrest in connection with this investigation, I anticipate further arrests will be made as the investigation continues.”

Mr. Greenwood read Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Christ Church before embarking on a career as an antiques dealer, according to his website.

On the same site he described himself as a “historian, biographer, author and art dealer with a particular interest in nineteenth century British military history”.

He retired four years ago to focus on his writing, producing hundreds of articles since about antiques.

A blue tent was erected outside the house, whilst Forensic teams searched through bins, hedges and drains along the street.

Hugo Kent-Egan, an Oxford student who lives nearby, commented, “I remember seeing the police tape closing off the section of Iffley Road when I was cycling into college yesterday and wondering what was going on, only saw the story just a few hours ago.

“Obviously there are very few details about the incident such as motive and so on, but it was really shocking to read the article and recognise the picture of his house on Iffley Road, just a 5 minute walk from where we live. For something like that to happen virtually on our doorsteps seems very surreal and out of place.

“Considering that to most people Oxford seems a very safe and fun place to live and that the only crime I’ve really ever come across this year in Cowley are bicycle thefts or burglaries, something like this really jars with people sense of safety and will perhaps make me more wary this term.”

Iffley Road reopened last night after officers were seen removing grey Vauxhall Vectra from the property.

However the three-storey house and three nearby properties remained cordoned off this morning.

A spokesman said Mr. Greenwood’s next of kin had been informed, although he is yet to be formally identified.

UPDATE (April 10 2016): Man arrested by police on the High Street released without charge by police.

Free speech French style

0

As I hurried up the steps of Toulouse’s central metro station one cold winter morning back in January, an advertising board caught my eye. Before me, the unmistakeable portrait of the French enlightenment writer Voltaire clunkily rolled up into view, accompanied by his most misquoted saying: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. Although this was actually formulated as a summary of Voltaire’s attitude towards free speech by a 1906 biographer, it still reflects his view and the point is very much relevant today. As the issue of free speech, especially on University campuses, becomes an increasingly hot topic, there is a great deal we could learn from Voltaire’s example.

In the aftermath of the tragic Charlie Hebdo attack on January 7 2015, which was seen as a direct assault on France’s highly cherished values of liberty and freedom of speech, it is perhaps no surprise that, Voltaire, renowned advocate of tolerance and free speech, was taken up as a figurehead in response by the mourning French people. Voltaire’s face began appearing on ‘Je suis Charlie’ posters, and his Treatise on Tolerance started to fly off the shelves. It was wielded as a symbol of solidarity with the victims and a metaphorical two-fingered salute to the terrorists.

Being an all-round thorn in the side of the Establishment in 18th century Europe, Voltaire was no stranger to trouble and controversy. The NUS’s no-platforming of offensive speakers nowadays would pale in comparison to the extreme and often violent censorship of 18th Century France. Furthermore, Voltaire’s signature sign-off on much of his correspondence,“Écrasez l’infâme!” (Crush what is infamous), criticising contemporary clerical abuses, would serve just as accurately as an ironic jibe at the NUS’s policy of no-platforming today. Throughout his writing career, Voltaire was imprisoned, repeatedly exiled, almost all of his works were banned and three of them were burnt upon release.

One of the central ideas running through all of his works was that of tolerance, in particular religious tolerance. Given the brutal religious wars in France in the 16th century and the constant tension between the Catholics and Protestants (Hugenots), this was a pressing issue at the time. Perhaps then, instead of dropping bombs on Daesh, we should be dropping copies of Voltaire; it would doubtless do more good.

“Voltaire’s furious scorn would come down hard on the NUS’s no-platforming rampage”

However, Voltaire’s philosophy went further than simply tolerating the views of others: he encouraged people to think, be curious and formulate their own ideas. This is perfectly displayed in a quotation taken from his aforementioned Treatise on Tolerance: “Think for yourselves, and allow others the privilege to do so, too.” There’s no doubt in my mind that, were he still alive and kicking, Voltaire’s furious scorn would come down hard on the NUS’s no-platforming rampage and the growing culture of censorship and thought policing on campuses.

Let’s now return to the famous quotation: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. What this means in practice is that, if you value freedom of expression as a right, then this means defending it for a whole host of misguided people: homophobes, racists, sexists etc.. What this doesn’t mean, as the quotation clearly highlights, is that you agree with their argument.

This is exactly the principle that the new breed of pseudo-progressive student ‘lefties’ so woefully fails to understand. The problem is that when you attempt to defend a person’s right to speak who has ‘problematic’ (to use their own cringe-worthy jargon) views, some are so trigger happy that they don’t even stop to attempt to understand what’s being said. They instantly shut down into generic lefty spiel defence mode, and presume that you too are supporting the offensive argument in question.

We need free speech for everyone, even white supremacist nut jobs and homophobic Bible bashers, because even though we may find their views offensive or hateful, by allowing them to speak freely, it provides a platform to engage them and challenge their views. If only people were as passionate in their desire to fight back against these bigoted opinions, as they are to decry them and call for them to be no platformed and banned.

With the NUS policy of no-platforming speakers with ‘offensive’ views, instead of fighting these opinions through well-reasoned argument and debate, we cower away from them and stick our heads in the sand. In the words of Charles Bukowski, “Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others. Their fear is only their inability to face what is real.”

In another Cherwell article, ‘Censorship is not becoming the new normal‘, Oliver Hurcum claims that, by inviting a speaker with offensive views, the institution is ‘normalising’ this point of view. He even goes on to suggest, using the example of Germaine Greer speaking at the Oxford Union, that by inviting her to speak, the Union is either condoning or willing to accept her ‘transphobic’ views.

I strongly disagree with this. Simply recognising that a certain person has an alternative, probably unpopular, opinion on a topic of debate, and then inviting them to provide an alternative line of argument isn’t showing support for it. It is respecting the value of having a balanced two-sided debate, and also providing an opportunity to challenge these views instead of just brushing them under the carpet and pretending they don’t exist.

It is the duty of any educational institution, especially universities, to present students with contrasting views on a variety of topical, contentious and potentially offensive subjects in order to help them develop as individuals and as intellectuals. Any NUS attempt to no-platform a speaker is a blatant betrayal of the students whose best interests it is supposed to protect and uphold.

The problems surrounding no-platforming and censorship on UK campuses is epitomised well in a particularly amusing Private Eye cartoon from last month. Voltaire manages to get out the first few words of his famous “I may disagree” quotation, before an NUS student officer ‘no-platforms’ him.

So, although I may disagree with what Hurcum says, I will defend to the death his right to say it.

 

Helping others, free of cost

0

Paid for and posted by Libros Para Niños. To find out more, visit their website. 

It’s the typical plight of all too many Oxford undergraduates as they look ahead towards the summer: “I want to go abroad and volunteer… but the cost.”

And it’s strange, almost contradictory: organisations charge exorbitant fees for the ‘privilege’ of doing volunteer work. Meanwhile, local law and finance firms are offering job experience and £15 an hour to do work in an office less than an hour from home. At the very least, shouldn’t flying out to help others be affordable?

This is the predicament that Libros Para Niños (LPN), a non-profit organisation launched and run by Oxford students, works to address. LPN emerged first as a book donating programme before developing into a travelling library. Today it helps place volunteers in service programs to work with local organisations and schools in struggling communities and regions across Latin America: in Panama, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

And LPN makes its placements for free: unlike ‘gap year’ companies or other volunteering organisations, which charge a fortune to place volunteers in schools in Latin America, LPN places its volunteers in programs without them having to pay a cent.

Founded by Dori Gilinski, herself the daughter of a Colombian father and Panamanian mother, LPN is by and large staffed by Oxonians whose experiences volunteering have shaped their worldviews – and who want as many fellow Oxford students to be able to have the same experience.

Gilinski and the rest of LPN’s team started with the initial purpose of collecting books through book drives and delivering them to compromised communities in developing countries across Latin America. But since 2010, as they came to realise how being forced to pay one’s one way was a problem for so many, LPN has connected people who want to help with volunteering opportunities, while providing support and advice throughout the duration of each trip.

LPN’s team is made of idealists, ambitious ones. Their mission: to catalyze a movement that engages colleges, schools, companies, governments and social enterprises and restructures the way current volunteer and teaching assistant placements are done.

It’s important work. The World Bank has written that getting good education is one of the most important challenges facing Latin America in 2016. LPN’s team is global, with staff members in cities as diverse as New York, London, Tegucigalpa and Tel Aviv. And they hope to leverage that global reach to place volunteers in programs where they can make the biggest impact – again, all for free.

LPN staff talk about why they started volunteering

President & CEO Dori Gilinski (Brasenose, Philosophy and Modern Languages, matriculation 2008):

“The time I spent volunteering in Panama forever changed me. It presented me with a reality that was worlds away from what I live day to day as a Philosophy and Modern Languages undergrad at Oxford. There were neither chairs nor desks, few books and no maps in that barren classroom. In the very same country where skyscrapers fill the air, and the motorway extends for hundreds of miles, six-year-old Yolanda came to class day after day suffering from stomach upsets because clean drinking water is limited in rural Panama.

“Despite the HDI continuing to rise (in 2011, Panama placed 58 of 187 countries), Panama has the second highest inequitable distribution of income in the Western Hemisphere. The significant economic growth the country has experienced over recent years does little to remedy the bleak levels of poverty. The World Bank recently reported that more than 1/3 of Panamanians live in poverty and nearly 15% in extreme poverty (that is, they live on less than $1/day).

“As my trip progressed, I began to question things. I felt guilty for how easy it was easy for me to go back and forth between Oxford and rural, backward San Vicente, but could I honestly say that the young children I was teaching would grow up to do the same? The economy is certainly booming and this will undoubtedly generate jobs, but will it help the uneducated poor or rather push them further and further behind as their homelands get absorbed by urban expansion and as the jobs that are created require a skilled workforce?”

Head of Development Christina Moorhouse (Brasenose, History, matriculated 2008):

“Volunteering in a school in Latin America gave such an incredible insight into the lives of the people I was working with. Living and working so closely within a community gave me a unique view of the dynamics within the society, the everyday concerns, hopes and dreams of the families, and how the children see their place within the community. This felt like an extremely personal experience, and one that will stay with me for a long time.

“The children that we work with are the future of the societies. The family and community ties are hugely important, so by investing in the children you are giving not only them a brighter future, but the whole community.

“I felt I learnt a huge amount both about the community in which I was working, but also about myself. It presented a whole new set of challenges to anything I had done before, and probably will do again, but I find the way that it shaped how I approach things is valuable every day.

“The challenges facing these children in gaining an education and their determination to do so despite this is so impressive.

“Access to a proper education is something we take for granted in the UK, but my experience volunteering made me appreciate it all the more how lucky we are, and how important it is to do something for those who are less fortunate and try to help give them a good start in life.”

Education Advisor Hector Keate (LMH, Maths and Philosophy, matriculated 2008):

“Whilst the primary aim of volunteering is to instigate direct economic and social impact on communities, students considering volunteering should also look at it in the context of broadening their skill set as they approach the job market. When selecting from a pool of highly able candidates, modern employers are keen to hire those students who not only exhibit passion and drive, but also those that have has international experience and have demonstrated commitment to wider social and ethical values.

“Speaking from my own experience, I turned down an internship at a top London consulting firm in order to go to Central America, visiting both educational and social development projects. Rather than harming my chances of employment, the firm was impressed by my attitude and ended up fast-tracking me through the graduate recruitment process and offering me a job.”

Scholarship Manager Emily Hawes (Brasenose, English, matriculated 2008):

“Volunteering in a Centre for Disabled Children in Ecuador was one of the most formative experiences of my life to date, and something I believe has been instrumental to my outlook on life since then.

“Before going to South America, I’d never really done anything that took me outside of my own environment. It taught me to really put myself in the shoes of someone else and reconsider my own assumptions of what it means to be happy and fulfilled.

“I spent six months working in Quito, Ecuador’s capital with children with varying disabilities, whose parents didn’t have the resources to look after them in the daytime. Every day, I was their own source of entertainment other than nurses who came to help feed and change them. Some of the children were as young as six months old, although the age range went up to ten.

“Helping those children, even on a day to day level, was a profoundly fulfilling experience. I knew no matter how mundane the task (feeding, changing, helping them finger paint!) I was making the children feel valued, and helping them to be stretched and challenged in a day which would otherwise have been blank for them. In a society where disabled children are largely sidelined and ignored, the appreciation you could see on the faces of the children (and the overworked nurses) was something I’ll never forget.

“For a school leaver about to embark on the real world, a volunteering experience is eye-opening: its challenging, different, difficult, confusing, fulfilling – and helps you ask the kind of questions that you continue to grapple with throughout your career and life. How do you want to make your mark on the world? How can you work in a way that will help others?

“These are the questions six-months’ volunteering sparked for me, and it’s this kind of inspiration we’re hoping to bring our volunteers for LPN.”

Of Dogs, Doughnuts, and Depression – 1

0

As you probably can tell from the title, I obviously have a knack for conjuring rather catchy titles that alliterate. I chose these very words, not for them to be thematically representative of what I write, but simply because they sound nice when placed together, and also because they are extant each and every day in my rather lonely life. I do not know what my blog will be about. But worry not, my posts will not revolve solely around these three seemingly disparate nouns. My supervising editor has very kindly, and in a potentially hazardous misplacement of confidence, reassured that creative control is very much in my hands. 

I will, therefore, write about what I want to. I will write about many things. I will write about many people and many places. I will write about why Brexit is a bad idea and why Bernie Sanders is such a grumpy but fun socialist grandpa. I will write about how I am absolutely buzzing for Radiohead’s new LP and how I am heartbroken in equal proportions when it comes to failing to buy a ticket to their May 28 gig in London (no surprises there, eh?). 

I will write about my Welsh Corgi, Ollie, who has just turned 3 months old, has a deviant liking towards mud-stained shoelaces, and has an unusually long tail for his breed. I love Ollie and find the companionship of a tender puppy one of the most beautiful things on earth. I will write about cinnamon sugar doughnuts that I get from Krispy Kreme in Cornmarket (and the occasional plain sugar doughnut – trust me, I KNOW my doughnuts), which I consume an unhealthy amount of on a near-daily basis. I probably take in too much sugar but I need the energy kick to cope with life. 

More importantly, I will also write about my rather unwelcome friend whom I have named Tom. I see Tom every day, and to be more precise, each and every minute since January 2015. He is there anytime and anywhere. He is, actually, not a living human being. No, he is far worse. He mostly is silent, but he does, in the odd night or two, speak to me. And when he does, he is very, very persuasive, dangerously so, and he gets to my head really easily. When I try not to listen, he screams and sometimes hits me. Which can be quite hard and can hurt quite bad. But when I start crying, Tom then knows that he has maybe gone a tad too far and then leaves me alone. Temporarily. And he definitely will return sometime after too. He always does. It is tough living with Tom. Perhaps I will spend more of my later posts chronicling this ongoing tempest of a friendship (or relationship, or whatever you might label it).

Anyhow, if this is getting too depressing to read, I apologize. This is quite literally my stream of consciousness and my ideas tend to bounce around a lot. As an introductory blog post, I think it may be appropriate to also note down what I have been up to in the past 3 weeks or so of the Easter vac. I log onto Facebook and I see right away that many of my college counterparts are having what appears to be a smashing time. Mine so far has been relatively monotonous. I went to Berlin straight after term, hoping to detox, hoping to explore someplace new, and to have a taste of the so-frequently-hailed-and-hashtagged pleasures of an ‘indie solo soul-searching trip’. And I did try my best to act like everything was going on fine. I took the customary selfie at Checkpoint Charlie (and the Brandenburger Tor, and the Reichstag, and the East Side Gallery), downed platter after platter of currywurst (and doughnuts too, don’t forget the doughnuts) and managed to tour all 5 museums on Museumsinsel under 5 hours (surely one of my more significant achievements lately). But it was not all sunshine and rainbows. Tom was there too and he spoiled the trip quite a bit. Anyhow, I am happy that I am now back home. I can usually keep Tom at bay when I am surrounded by places and people most familiar to me. This is all from me for now – I look forward to continue my weekly musings.

Such, so far, are the secret confessions of a shy boy from Hong Kong.

Panama Papers to have “no impact” on honorary degree

0

Oxford University told Cherwell Wednesday morning that mentions of Oscar-winning director Pedro Almodóvar, and his brother Agustín, in the Panama Papers have had “no impact” on the plan to award the Spanish filmmaker with an honorary degree. Almodóvar has, however, cancelled media events related to his new film, Julieta.

The decision to award Almodóvar was announced February 22, with the University at the time explaining that “Mr Pedro Almodóvar is a director and screenwriter, winner of the Jean Renoir Award for Screenwriting Achievement, and Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He achieved international recognition for the film Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown in 1988, and has since won multiple awards for Talk to Her, All About My Mother, and Volver, among others.”

“In any case, I reiterate that both my brother Pedro and I, as well as our producer, are up-to-date with all of our tax obligations.” – Agustín Almodóvar

It was revealed earlier this week by the Panama Papers that the Almodóvars were complicit in using tax havens to hide their wealth offshores, away from taxation. While being named in the Panama Papers does not necessarily amount to evidence of criminal wrongdoing, Iceland’s prime minister has already been forced to resign after appearing in them and dozens of other prominent figures have been implicated in the 11.5 million document leak.

Agustín Almodóvar took responsibility for his brother, saying that from the beginning, “Pedro and I divided up the tasks and duties very clearly. I took charge of all of the issues related to the management of the company, and he dedicated himself to all of the creative aspects.”

“In this context, I would like to clarify that the creation of the company in 1991 was on the recommendation of my advisors given a possible international expansion of our company. Notwithstanding that, the company was left to die without activity because it did not fit in our way of working.”

“I deeply lament the prejudice my brother’s public image is suffering, cause solely and exclusively by my lack of experience in the first few years of operation of our family company.”

“In any case, I reiterate that both my brother Pedro and I, as well as our producer, are up-to-date with all of our tax obligations.”

The University did not offer further comment.

Oxford researchers warn against new power stations

0

Energy companies can only go on building new coal and gas power stations for one more year if the world is to meet its global warming targets, according to a new study by Oxford academics.

Researchers at the Institute of New Economic Thinking have shown that the electricity generating infrastructure likely to give 2°C warming will have been reached by 2017. After the ‘2°C capital stock’ is exhausted, all new electricity sector investments will need net zero emissions in order not to exceed the internationally agreed global warming target.

At the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015, representatives from 195 countries agreed to “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels”.

This Oxford study casts serious doubt, however, on whether this is achievable. Stressing the urgency of the situation, the paper states that “the energy system is now at risk of undermining climate stability.”

When asked about the relative importance of the energy sector in achieving the climate goals, Richard Millar, one of the authors of the paper, told Cherwell, “Energy and heat currently contributes about four per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions.” He added, “carbon dioxide-induced warming of the climate system is essentially permanent.”

If policymakers ignore the findings of the study, they run the future risk of “stranding otherwise economically valuable assets,” which would “likely induce significant costs and loss of capital”.

The study defines ‘2°C capital stock’ as infrastructure that gives a 50 per cent chance of 2°C warming based on the normal economic lifespan of power plants, and with the optimistic assumption that all other sectors reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement struck in December.

Harriet Waters, Head of Environmental Sustainability at Oxford University, told Cherwellthat “the University is currently spending in the region of £1.5-2 million per annum on energy saving projects,” adding, “99 per cent of the University’s purchased electricity comes from a renewable source.”

The idea that no new carbon dioxide emitting infrastructure can be built in less than two years’ time has serious implications for the investment in the energy sector. Perhaps as a sign of the sector’s uncertain future, a spokesperson for the Oxford University Endowment Fund, responsible for £2 billion of assets from university colleges, told Cherwell, “we have already have significantly lower exposure to energy than if the fund was passively invested.”