Monday 23rd June 2025
Blog Page 1137

The truth about college football

0

Istart this article with a tribute to rugby. In what has been a stellar World Cup, with drama already exceeding that produced at the last football World Cup, it is the attitude of the players and fans that has shone through. But the instance I would like to highlight in particular was referee Owen Jones’ moment of brilliance summing up the difference in cul- ture between two of Britain’s favourite sports while making Scottish full-back Stuart Hogg look rather sheepish: “Dive like that again and come back here in two weeks and play. Not again. Watch it.”

I spent my school days desperately trying to get out of rugby as I didn’t like having my toes stepped on, having my ears rammed between two guys’ thighs at second row and, to be hon- est, generally having my legs taken out from under me.

However, I have to respect a sport that con- tains so much aggression with barely a swear word or complaint heard all game.

In a recent football game I played for Jesus against St Hilda’s, I was left completely dumbfounded – not by how our defence had managed to leak six goals without us getting a shot on target, but by the amount of pointless backchat and appealing.

It is a virus that has got worse over my three years at Oxford. The odd thing is that, having played seconds football for much of last season (where games are not allocated referees and the game is instead refereed by a sub from each team in either half), I have noticed this culture is unique to the first team game.

The obvious reasoning could be that people care more in the first team. That might be part- ly true but seems unlikely given that, at least at Jesus, we are regularly missing eight ‘first team players’ while the second team is flooded with squads of 20. I don’t believe that they want to win any less. In any case, is it even possible to care enough that you would degrade yourself to whining “He was hugging me, ref”? Come on guys. Grow up!

More likely it’s because both teams accept that half the time the slight bias in every 50-50 decision will go their way, and the other half the time that it won’t. In seconds football if you dive, sulk or shout “Ref, you’ve got to do something, its dangerous!” when you’ve just been muscled off the ball, at least five people will laugh out loud at you and another three will spend the rest of the 90 minutes trying to wind you up some more – and that is exactly what you deserve.

You’re not Wayne Rooney. Your season, career and reputation are unaffected by a col- lege ref who’s been paid £25 to put up with this petulant nonsense. You’re probably a second- year geographer who’s whiling away time before finals and your inevitable submission to management consultancy.

I am sorry to St Hilda’s Football Club for picking you out, but I imagine my words are unlikely to even reach you, let alone embarrass you. I have no doubt that you will perform admirably in the third tier of Oxford Univer- sity College Football; you might even be in the battle for promotion to the second tier of Ox- ford University College Football. But at the end of the day, if you’ve ever had a striker pull out of a game because they need to finish an essay on the grammatical functions of proper nouns, you’re not a serious enough team to warrant shouting handball at every aerial challenge.

I used to brush of the accusations about the nature of football from my rugby-playing friends as an exaggeration based on heavily hyped media coverage. With regret, I have to admit they were right.

OUNC see Light Blue

0

When you imagine a sports event where bodies are thrown around all over the place, you don’t necessarily think of a netball match straight away. But that was what was on display at Iffley on Wednesday of Second Week as the Blues net- ball side took on Nottingham in a brutally physical league fixture, losing 34-25.

Last year was a season of sustained and con- tinued success for the Blues, who finished top of the BUCS Midlands 2A league with a goal difference of +141. A run of four consecutive wins in the final stretch of the season, as well as an emphatic 32-23 victory over Warwick 1sts led to promotion into the higher ech- elons of the BUCS Midlands 1A. Playing the best teams in the country week in, week out has soon proved to be a baptism of fire for theUniversity netball side.

OUNC’s season got off to a slow start, with a loss to perennial sporting powerhouse Loughborough in their first league match. Confidence remains high in the squad; this is very much a continuity team, with many of the last year’s top players retained, bestow- ing the side with a core group of experienced veterans, as well as some exciting fresh talent rising through the ranks. One can see why expectations inside and outside Blues netball are sky-high for this season. 

The second competitive encounter of the season came against Nottingham. utilising home advantage to the maximum, the Blues ran out to a 6-point lead within the opening 5 minutes against Nottingham. however, their opponents were not to be put away so easily as they clawed their way back into the game by the end of the first quarter demonstrating the skill and resilience that has taken them to the summit of BUCS Midlands 1A. Nottingham’s physicality defined the second quarter’s the opposing team made an apparent effort to physically impose upon the Dark blues, causing Oxford players to fall left, right and centre. The aggressive style of play inevitably put pressure on the Blues, particularly on the attack, although the defence did fantastically to stop the flood- gates from opening, led by the infallible captain Beth Nichol at centre. The strength of Nottingham persisted throughout the second half, with some fiercely contested refer- eeing decisions causing Dark Blue tempers to flair. Despite their determination, the Blues were unable to regain the lead and lost their second consecutive game, dropping to the bottom of BUCS Midlands 1A.

As with any loss, there were positives to take away. The attack, which had faltered against the intimidating Loughborough defence, had shown more promise and chemistry, display- ing occasional brilliance in bringing the ball down the court. The defence was once again superb, aided by the court vision and play- reading of goalkeeper/goal defence Ailsa Key- ser, who made successive flying steals to break up Nottingham’s attack. Man of the match was awarded to fresher Frankie Anderson, goalkeeper/wing defence, who anchored the Blues defence along with Keyser and Nichol.

Hoping to move on from the defeat, Oxford took on historic rivals Cambridge on the 28th in what many passionate netball fans hoped to be a thrilling dress rehearsal for the Varsity match in Hilary. Cambridge had lost earlier in the week to Worcester University, landing them just above Oxford in the league tables due to goal difference. The Light Blues had also been beaten by Nottingham by the same margin as Oxford, although according to sources lacked the Dark Blues’ physicality and court presence.

The early-season clash of rivals was thus fuelled not only by the age-old rivalry between the two universities, but also by the competi- tive desire not to be the bottom-dwellers of the division. However, Oxford’s hopes were dashed as they fell 33-29, succumbing to the pressure of playing away at Cambridge, who were led by an outstanding second-year cap- tain Frances Lee-Barber.

OUNC were once again impressive on the defensive end but were unable to build on the momentum generated in the match against Nottingham on the attack, as they failed to score over 30 points for the third consecutive match. 

Given the tumultuous start to the season, the stage is set for a challenging campaign. OUNC faces a formidable Worcester side away next week, before beginning a three-game home stand against Nottingham Trent, Cardiff and Loughborough. Whether they can turn their season around will inevitably depend on the team’s character and abilitiy to move on and develop. Here the squad’s relative youth may prove to be a blessing in disguise.

Netball is sometimes unfairly forgotten in Oxford, a sport which is played the length and breadth of the country in schools but has undoubtedly been pushed into the shade somewhat at university level by the dominance of rowing, rugby and football.  The Blues, energised and aiming for successm will hope to change that. For now though, the challenge for OUNC is to climb off the foot of the table and reclaim some pride, lost at the hands of the Tabs

An education: in search of my first rugby experience

0

16:00 – The shame has been with me since 2002. Every time I pull out my passport, a tear of guilt forms in my eye. A Kiwi who claims to be an avid sports fan who’s never watched a rugby game in his entire 19 years of existence on this planet? Stop it. Those creatures don’t exist. But alas, I was indeed one of those pitiful beings, trapped in a whirlpool of self-loathing and indignation when it came to rugby.

But no more. As I sit on the comfy sofa in the Regent’s Park college bar, left hand nervously gripping a pint of questionable lager, I draw on all the national pride I have and brace myself for the Rugby World Cup semi-finals match between the mighty All Blacks and the Springboks. Rugby had never appealed to me before – I didn’t know any of the players or any of the rules. But the hiding had to stop and what better way to do it then to support the country that I unconvincingly call ‘home’ through its pursuit of glory? Of course, the chance to drink beer, watch sports and document my experience in the name of Cherwell made the venture a bit more appealing.

16:05 – I’m feeling comfortable, happily nursing my pint and still clueless as ever, when New Zealand concedes its first penalty of the day before I could even sip my beer. The kick is successfully taken by a man who can only be described as a Tony Kroos lookalike who’s been living in the gym since birth. Meanwhile, a bitter English fresher states that he lost interest in the tournament ever since England was disgracefully knocked out of the group stages, whilst the JCR president make an attempt at rugby related chat. No one is surprised or amused.

16:08 – Kaino scores a try for the All Blacks, sporting a very stylish headband. Unenthusiastic murmurs of “Oh hey, he scored” fill the bar. A bunch of big men start hugging on TV. Life is good, apparently.

16:24 – Slow motion replay of a tackle made on NZ’s no. 2 makes me glad that I never picked up the sport in primary school. God bless my childhood chubbiness. Conversation switches to the Premier League, which obviously means a standard check of football scores and fantasy team. Chelsea selling dreams. Vardy scores again. None of this is relevant.

16:28 – The guy with the Go-Pro next to the scrum must not have had any regard for his well-being when deciding on an occupation.

16:39 – Aforementioned reckless individual confirmed to be the ref. In other news, it has room ignores him.

16:42 – Commentator says exactly the opposite of what I said three minutes ago. I’m going to go with what I’m seeing. Screw that guy.

17:07 – Wrongly thinking that halftime is 15 minutes, I miss Carter scoring a drop goal to make it 12-10. Another indication that I know absolutely nothing about this game.

17:14 – Try for the All Blacks as super-sub Barrett dives towards the corner. Despite the fact that I haven’t been back to New Zealand since 2013 and I don’t actually remember the national anthem, patriotic pride is starting to sink in. My jubilation is shared with the ecstatic kiwi crowd on the screen, but not with the slightly confused people around me.

17:28 – All Blacks continue to pile pressure on South Africa. The thought of pressure triggers the sudden realization that I have an essay on twentieth-century American unionization due dangerously soon. Oh well. I love rugby.

17:48 – Five minutes left and it’s actually getting tense. All the players look exhausted, but the All Blacks look like they’ve got more to give than their SA counterparts, playing relentlessly as if they’re the team that’s behind. Commentator suggests that New Zealand’s experience gives them the edge, which would have made sense if the other team has never been to the semi-finals before. But from what I hear, South Africa is a powerhouse. Questionable commentating apparently is universal after all.

17:53 – New Zealand wins the match 20-18. I celebrate with a fist-pump, met with a chorus of “You don’t know anything about rugby.” As if that really matters.

After 113 minutes of confusion and exhilaration, my first experience of rugby concluded. Although my understanding of the game was not enhanced by much, it was nonetheless evident that this match was an immaculate showcase of skill and will. Needless to say, I can’t wait for the second part of my rugby education next week, when the All Blacks hopefully win it all. 

Stormy seas for Oxford yachting

0

October is not traditionally thought of as a time for the seaside. This October, however, the Oxford University Yacht Club travelled to Le Pouliguen, France to compete in the annual Student Yachting World Cup. Now in its 35th year, this competition is organised by the students of École Polytechnique and features the best teams from teams all around the world. Oxford joined Southampton and Cambridge to represent England against a collection of teams from Europe, America, Asia and Australia.

The first day of racing began in perfect style, bright sunshine and a brisk ten-knot wind welcoming the competitors to the first race. The first set of races made the most of the picturesque bays and inlets which characterise this section of the French coast, with the Swiss team from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne racing to an early lead.

The Oxford crew featured veteran Oliver Glanville at the helm, Josh Bell on trim, Lulu Wallis on bow and Eric Topham on main and navigation. However, fate conspired against the Dark Blues as technical issues prevented them from racing on the fi rst day whilst Southampton and Cambridge solidified their positions at the head of the pack.

The second day saw even more the good weather, with the wind picking up with gusts up to 17 knots. The Swiss and Southampton crews maintained momentum to take second and third place, while the shock of the day was Cambridge cracking under pressure and finishing second to last. The Canadian team from Dalhousie University also surprised, finishing fourth successively and challenging consistently to break the Swiss/ Southampton hegemony. The final inshore race of the day was fiercely contested, with only four minutes separating first and late place.

The final costal race of the day saw Oxford race into a big lead after a fantastic start, but technical problems once again ate away at the advantage and the crew fell from third place at the half-way stage to a disappointing eighth position by the end.

The weather and the high standards of competition had set up the final day of the competition to be tantalisingly close, with the Southampton and Swiss teams leading the way. With strong winds preventing the usage of larger spinnakers, Canada won the first race after dominating from beginning to end. Southampton and the Swiss continued their competition even till the final stretch of the final race, regularly swapping between first and second. Though Southampton would clinch the race, the consistent excellence of the Swiss saw them gain the world title.

Oxford finished in eighth place, a slightly disappointing result, but entirely respectable given the high standards of the international competition. Battling against the best yachtsmen and women from around the world, as well as technical issues and inclement weather, fairer winds await OUYC. 

Stuck in the fanzone

0

It’s happening again. It’s the 89th minute, and Paul Caddis has just slotted home what will likely be the winning goal. The whole ground erupts, and my dad runs towards the nearest Nottingham Forest fans. He leaps down three flights of stairs to celebrate in front of them, leaking f-bombs and lager before he’s dragged back to his seat by a team of hi-vis jackets. Not that I was embarrassed. No, I was shouting him on, virtually baying for blood. Those same away fans had had the audacity to turn around and celebrate when their team equalized just five minutes before, and this felt like justice.

You see, my family is infected, and has been for over a century. We are doomed to have our happiness decided by the fortunes of Birmingham City Football Club. My day is made significantly better, or significantly worse, by how they get on. There’s no reason for it, and I know as well as anyone how insane it is. I’ve tried to rationalize it before, to tell myself that it’s just a sport that should have no ramifications for how my life goes as a whole. But it’s no good; I have the bug. When I see we’ve lost, the bottom comes out from my stomach and despair trails me for the day. If the game is a big one, I sometimes feel it for days, like a persistent hangover or chesty cough that digs in and makes routine tasks a little harder.

In everyday life, my dad is an upstanding member of the community. He pays his taxes, waves to the postman and has never been in any serious trouble with the law. He’s a respected professional who’s reflective, rational and politically engaged. Yet here he was virtually attacking a stranger because his football team had scored a goal. It wouldn’t be the first, or indeed the last time. Just a year before, he’d celebrated Nikola Žigic’s winner literally in the face of a giant Villa fan, and would have had ten years knocked off him were it not the timely intervention of a few bystanders.

My uncle too, once had to write an apology note to former British tennis No. 2 Greg Rudeski, after he calling him a “traitorous cunt” in a pub in London when he celebrated a goal against England. He’s a retired civil servant, and now teaches guitar to children. I wonder if all the friends I made in my first weeks at uni would have still talked to me if they knew that in just ten months time I’d be sitting outside the JCR crying into my Beckham shirt as Luis Suarez sent England out of the World Cup. They certainly wouldn’t have guessed that someone who is usually introspective and left wing would get caught up in something so close to nationalist fervour.

For the layman, such passion about football can be perplexing. Among enlightened circles it is often seen as vulgar and crass. It is true that people in the frenzy of football have committed terrible crimes. Where such strong passions swirl, the wrong people easily harness them. For me now, it’s inescapable. I watch not because I find it interesting or enjoyable, but because I have a deep emotional investment. When I see a player on my team get sent off for the wrong reason, I’m not just annoyed because it goes against the rules of the game. I feel a genuine, intense sense of injustice. It’s the kind of feeling that makes my dad launch himself down the terraces at complete strangers, and my uncle verbally assault a tennis player. It’s never rational and often embarrassing.

Given the choice however, I could never sink back into the ranks of the casual spectator. There are some people that watch football for the spectacle, enjoying the wonder goals and great players. They can talk at length about who they think will win the league, or whether Messi is better than Ronaldo. But they’ll never feel real, seething anger at either. They’ll never be nine years old fi ghting back tears as Ronaldo gives his famous wink to the touchline, and for that reason they’ll always be missing something

Women’s Football kicks off

0

Whether it is on-field success or strong social showings, Oxford football has consistently proven itself to be one of the university’s premier sports clubs. This year, more than ever, the Women’s Blues and Furies are at the heart of its success. Competing in the BUCS league and cup, the women’s teams boast burgeoning memberships, impressive results and exciting longterm prospects. Whilst this year’s campaign is in its infancy, an impressive 6-0 triumph away at the University of Derby has only served to heighten the Blues’ early season excitement. Braces from Colleen Lopez and captain Caroline Ward confirmed an emphatic response to a season-opening defeat to Nottingham Trent the previous week. Helen Bridgman and Christina Gough were also on the score sheet to ensure Trent’s last-minute winner was all but forgotten.

The women’s second team, the Furies, took on Staffordshire University (Stoke) on Wednesday 21st October. It was a physical encounter in which the Furies emerged triumphant, strikers Mary Hintze and Habiba Daggash peppering the Stoke goal line throughout the game. Hintze took the first goal, receiving a pinpoint-accurate cross from Lucy Balasz. The right winger Balasz followed up with another strike, with a third and fourth soon following for the Furies. A second half come back from Stoke, left the final score at 4-1 to the Dark Blues.

With rapidly improving team chemistry and a string of talented individuals, a repeat of the 2013/14 promotion winning season is certainly high on the agenda. Emulating last season’s three- and five-goal thrashings of the club’s Light Blue contemporaries is an equally important aspiration. For the Furies, last term’s victories over Brookes and BCU are this year’s benchmark for success.

At college level, the women’s football set-up is equally impressive; a four-division collegiate league system and a fiercely fought out Cuppers competition is testament to that. Whilst the campaign proper has yet to begin, last year’s champions Worcester will be hoping to mount another serious title challenge.

Mili Malde, this year’s incoming captain for Wadham/Green Templeton Women’s, knows the strains and stresses of a new season better than most. Wadham/Green Templeton had a tough season last year, finishing second last in the Women’s 2nd Division with three points. Though losing captain and goalkeeping inspiration Diana Greenwald to an American PhD programme, Malde is hopeful that the surge in interest at the college freshers fair will translate into a crop of eager new players. “I’ve seen so many talented new players its difficult to know where to start, but fresher Louise Nolan, and a second year, Lea Kambskarð-Bennett have particularly caught the eye.”

The influx of new players and rise in participation in women’s football as a whole, ensures this season will be the most exciting yet.

Interview: Jamie Phillips

0

At the age of just 20, Jamie Phillips became the youngest ever assistant conductor of the Manchester-based Hallé Orchestra. Since this appointment, he has gone on to conduct orchestras across the world, recently being appointed the Dudamel Fellow of the Los Angeles Philharmonic. On Thursday 5th November, he will conduct Oxford University Orchestra (OUO) in a performance of Mahler’s 7th Symphony.

 

Are you excited about coming to Oxford?

I am indeed! I’ve been looking forward to this concert for a long time. The chance to be able to perform Mahler’s amazing 7th Symphony doesn’t come along very often, and I’m delighted to be able to debut it with OUO.

 

You became associated with the Hallé at a very early age, did you feel under a lot of pressure and how did you deal with being thrust into the spotlight?

 In all honesty, I wasn’t particularly aware of huge pressures. There was some media interest when I became Assistant Conductor of the Hallé, mostly due to the fact that I was the youngest person to hold the post. I’ve now been with the orchestra for over three years, and am doing some very exciting work with them, but thankfully I’m surrounded by very generous people who care greatly about using the Assistant Conductor post to educate young conductors, rather than to scare them and put them off for life! I’ve just been made Associate Conductor of the orchestra, which is a great honour.

 

Mahler is known for his monumental symphonies, what are the particular challenges associated with conducting his music?

 Conducting Mahler comes with many complications, but because Mahler himself was a great conductor, his scores are littered with instructions as to how to conduct the piece. Every other bar, there is a marking which says ‘not too fast here, careful not to rush’, or ‘the flutes are the most important instrument here’ – it’s like he’s left you an instruction manual for some flat-pack furniture, and you somehow have to piece it together! Of course in reality there is a great deal more interpretation to do with the music, but from the outset you undoubtedly have a very clear idea of how Mahler wants the music to sound, whereas with many other composers there is substantially more freedom to interpret. You really do feel he is sitting on your shoulder as you conduct his music.

 

For you, what individuates Mahler 7 from his other symphonies? 

It seems to be his least performed symphony, for reasons which are interesting to consider. The 8th symphony also doesn’t get performed very often, but that’s more for practical reasons due to the huge scale that it’s on and the vast number of performers required. The 7th symphony, however, is written for a much more conventional sized orchestra; although it does require quadruple woodwinds, it only calls for 4 horns, 3 trumpets, etc. It is very complex to play, which deters many orchestras from approaching it, and perhaps more significantly, is tricky to understand. It left the audience at the premiere more confused than anything else, with many describing it as incoherent. I think what makes this symphony stand out from Mahler’s others is that it is not always narrative. The two ‘Nachtmusik’ or ‘nightmusic’ movements (the 2nd and 4th) seem to create a mood and to trigger an emotional response, but you feel less like it’s to do with Mahler looking inwards to himself, but rather as a celebration of his compositional genius. We have come to expect Mahler’s music to be almost neurotic and triumphant in equal measure, but this symphony seems to do something quite different.

 

You’ve worked extensively with youth orchestras as conductor of the Hallé Youth Orchestra, what aspects of these collaborations do you particularly enjoy?

I’m very fortunate to work with some truly wonderful professional orchestras, but it has to be said that my work with young people is something that I find equally, if not more, rewarding. Performances which I do with the HYO are generally full of energy (admittedly, not perfect – what ever is?), and to see the progress which a group of non-specialist young musicians makes over the course of a year is a truly remarkable thing.

 

What are some of the highlights of your upcoming engagements?

I’m currently working as a Dudamel Fellow with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, which is a true privilege, and is giving me some great opportunities to immerse myself in the life of a really great orchestra. I get to do some concerts of my own with the orchestra in the Spring, which I can’t wait to do. I’m very fortunate to do quite a bit of conducting in Europe, and I’m looking forward to returning to the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande in Geneva, as well as the Luxembourg Philharmonic, Deutsche Radio Philharmonie, BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra, and continuing to work with the wonderful Hallé in Manchester.

 

OUO performs Mahler’s 7th Symphony at 8pm on Thursday 5th November, at the Sheldonian Theatre.

Review: The Prophetess

0

★★★★☆

Oxford reviews tend to fall into two categories – those that attempt genuine critical appraisal, and those commissioned from friends or spouses or family members who work for student publications: these tend not to be critical at all, but are part of the publicity of the show. Of course, the latter are not worthy of your time.

In order to prove, then, that this is not an exercise in back-scratching, I begin with the negatives. At certain points, injudicious glissando jarred with the style of the music; very occasionally, the singing felt disconcertingly unconnected to the orchestra; and, as with all student productions seen by this reviewer, the acting was of variable quality, with touches of sensitivity counteracted by awkwardness elsewhere: perhaps some finer points were left under-rehearsed. (But then this was the opening night.)

The triviality of these cavils may already have induced some suspicion of my position. But now I have done my duty, I can reveal how much I enjoyed myself. My prevailing impression was of a show professionally produced and executed with acuity. Nor was the task straightforward. The show is a curious hybrid of play and opera: Purcell’s music was originally intended as incidental. The libretto (if that is the right term here) was provided by Leo Mercer, and was commissioned for this production. While never really sparkling, it was always highly competent, capably meeting the demands of the score: where  pathos or levity was required, the libretto gamely rose to the task. The conceit was strong – the story of the opera provides an opportunity for Delphine to escape the mundanity of her everyday life (one identifies): we accompany her on her fictional voyage through Ancient Rome. In the final scene we see the effect that the story has on her.

Jasmine White was convincing as the nerdy Delphine, and Danny Scarponi brought a not unwonted Gallic swagger to the role of Dioclesian. The supporting cast was generally strong, with Raphaël Millière’s mellifluous bass worthy of particular praise. The orchestra, again, was generally excellent, seldom missing a note under the magisterial baton of Matthew F. Reese.

Special praise must be reserved for the director, Dionysios Kyropoulos, who injected considerable flamboyance into what might easily have been a static, drab production – opera of this period is tricky: its fondness for long arias sets a considerable challenge for any director. The movement, the set, the costumes: all was efficient without ever trespassing into the officiousness which lamentably characterises the majority of modern opera, student and professional. The slick ideas with which the production teemed seldom obscured the action or music, and often enhanced it. Quite an accolade.

So, despite some reservations, this critic was impressed. A difficult task – ambitiously assailed – efficiently executed.

Cultural appropriation is not OK

0

Today is Halloween and, don’t get me wrong, I love it. I think fancy dress can be fun and hilarious and clever and a source of joy for a great deal of people – and, generally speaking, anything that makes a bunch of people quite happy is something I’m a big fan of, too.

What I’m not a big fan of, though, is cultural appropriation, and on no other night is it as common as it is on Halloween. Like a Union President’s ascent into politics, the sombreros,  Native American headdresses, blackface, and bindis are painfully predictable and easy to see coming as we look ahead to tonight’s festivities. Earlier this month the online retailer, ASOS, came under heavy criticism for labelling a range of bindis as Halloween items. Most people who don Native American headdresses, “Sexy Geisha” costumes, or “Islamic Terrorist” costumes tonight don’t actively mean to offend anyone – they probably just think it’s a bit of a laugh or a great look that would make a good picture.

Unfortunately, however, the ways in which we choose to represent ourselves often take on meanings we didn’t even consider when they are seen by others, and this is particularly true at Halloween. The issue is not if you belong to a culture and wish to express your cultural identity through clothing; the issue is when people take on costumed stereotypes of cultures that do not belong to them. If you are not a member of a community, particularly a marginalised or historically oppressed one, it is not okay to pretend you are for one night, only to return to your regular life in the morning.

Every culture has some really interesting clothes or concepts, of course – but you can appreciate them without needing to put them on your body. Cultural ways of presenting oneself such as bindis and headdresses look great, because that’s what they’re meant to do. They are important cultural signifiers that exist as part of important cultural rituals. They do not exist, and they never should exist, to be worn by someone who does not belong to that culture as part of a costume on Halloween. Clothing, make up, and other physical cultural signifiers are not costume playthings: they have significant meaning behind them on every day of the year, and not just on October 31st.

The issue of cultural appropriation is a very tricky one for a lot of people, and rightly so, particularly when you consider the fact that some of the groups that are most often victims of cultural appropriation were historically victims of much more serious crimes perpetrated by white people.

 It easy to think that your Indian Halloween costume, for example, is fine so long as your Indian friend says that they aren’t offended. But that’s the thing: feelings are subjective and not every member of a certain community, ethnicity, or cultural identity feels the same way about their cultural identity, and who can or cannot partake in or reference it. Just because one person of Native American descent, for example, isn’t offended by a white person donning a headdress doesn’t make it okay.

Yet while each person’s feelings about cultural identity are different and subjective, a history of oppression is not subjective. A society in which racism is institutionalised is not subjective. And these are the kinds of things that we really need to talk about when we discuss cultural appropriation.

Sci-fi classic? Not by a giant leap

Launching onto the big screen, The Martian is Ridley Scott’s most recent foray into the sci-fi scene. Assisted by NASA experts, there’s a touch of sincerity about this presentation. Not simply your run-of-the-mill space age flick, this is a movie with a mission statement. A cautionary tale, if you will – one whose action-packed sequences are tightly wed to the risks and rewards associated with an era of exploration, of SpaceX and Elon Musk.

And, if that weren’t enough, a star-studded cast boasting Matt Damon as lead, with Kristen Wiig, Jeff Daniels, Sean Bean and Chiwetel Ejiofor in supporting roles, The Martian has all the makings of a cult classic.

Glitzy gizmos, sensational cinematography – a sci-fi fanatic’s delight; what’s not to love? Well, quite a lot actually. And here’s the problem: subgenre. Space odysseys tend to gravitate toward one of two categories – the cinematic and the melodramatic. Take Gravity – it’s all about the cinematic thrill, the immersive experience of dazzling special effects and their mastery, not so much the script itself. Dialogue is sparse and character development is limited, whereas Interstellar revels in melodrama – a dense, fantastical script and soppy sentimentalism. This detaches us from reality, transports us to another realm.

The Martian is in between. It suffers from being too funny to be serious, but too serious to be funny. Rather than boldly going where no director has ever gone before, the movie industry seems content to tread in circles. We have yet to see a space movie whose audiovisual effects are matched by realistic, riveting storytelling.

Opening with another day at the office on planet Mars, Wadi Rum in Jordan provides the perfect backdrop for the Red Giant. Engrossed in some “Hey, look! We’re astronauts doing our thing” banter, Ares III is suddenly swept up in a spectacular dust storm. This leads to an emergency evacuation of the crew, leaving Mark Watney (Matt Damon) mistakenly assumed dead and stranded on Mars. After a convoluted explanation of his miraculous survival – courtesy of a video log cliché – Watney gets down to business. He has 300 days of provisions and needs to figure out a way of stretching what little he has out to 1480 days, all the while trying to make contact with Earth. No pressure. Eventually spotted by NASA, it’s left to Vincent Kapoor (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and Teddy Sanders (Jeff Daniels), the director, to begin piecing together a rescue plan, albeit covertly at first. After an impressive and rather liberal use of the word ‘shit’ by (American) rocket scientists, contact is made with the aid of the 1997 Pathfinder probe. The Hermes; that is, the escape vessel en route back home, makes a U-turn but will they get there in time?

Comic relief is ever present in The Martian. A running gag in the film is Mission Commander Melissa Lewis’ (Jessica Chastain) taste in music, 1970s disco – which is the only available playlist on the planet. Whether Watney is driving across the surface of Mars seated next to a decaying isotope listening to ‘Hot Stuff ’ by Donna Summer, or dismantling his launch vehicle to ‘Waterloo’ by ABBA , there’s a song for every occasion.

Reviewing this movie has not quite been analogous with watching Matt Damon farm potatoes in his own excrement for two hours and twenty minutes, but sadly it’s not far off . Watney never truly grows as a character; instead he takes everything in his stride. Likewise with the cast, despite being surrounded by “a galaxy of stars” [The Guardian], there are no breathtaking performances here. And while there were some memorable scenes, such as Damon being propelled into space ‘in a convertible,’ I fear that this movie has just been one small step for the genre, and one giant payout for 20th Century Fox.