Tuesday 19th August 2025
Blog Page 1188

Union in colonial cocktail catastrophe

0

The Oxford Union provoked outrage on Thursday evening by advertising a drink for sale named ‘The Colonial Comeback!’ at their weekly debate, ‘This House believes Britain owes reparations to her former colonies’.

At least two versions of the flyer advertised the cocktail. Of those seen by Cherwell, one was accompanied by an image of two hands bound in chains, which has been interpreted as suggesting the figure of a slave, and the second by a map of former British African colonies.

After pictures of the former were widely shared on social media, the flyers advertising the cocktail were immediately withdrawn. While the Secretary would usually read out the name of the night’s cocktail in the chamber before the debate, Cherwell understands that on Thursday evening Nikolay Koshikov omitted to announce it.

Zuleyka Shahin, Union Treasurer, also made a statement to the Chamber apologising for any offense caused, saying, “I would like you to know that I was not involved in the decision-making process,” adding that she would be “following this up”.

Since images of the cocktail have been widely shared, there has been a huge backlash on social media. Annie Teriba, founder of Oxford’s Black Students’ Union and Wadham SU’s People of Colour Officer, commented, “Apparently, it’s okay to kick back in the Union bar relishing in a ‘Colonial Comeback’ cocktail. I am horrified that the Union thinks it’s okay to trivialise centuries of oppression and racist violence in the form of a refreshing drink.

“For some students, including myself, colonialism is a hard pill to swallow, especially as its legacy continues to visit violence upon black bodies. I shall be expecting an apology and explanation from the President for allowing the bar of an institution I paid money to join to be decorated with colonial pornography.”

Aliya Yule, Women’s Campaign Officer, also reacted with anger, telling Cherwell, “Colonialism is not a joke to be made into a cocktail name. Colonial history is one in which Oxford University is heavily implicated, institutionally and through individuals such as Cecil Rhodes.

“For the Oxford Union to then ‘jokingly’ use this name for a cocktail shows a careless disregard for students whose lives and family histories are tainted with the violence of colonialism. Unfortunately, I would not expect much better from the Union.”

The speakers for last night’s debate include HE Hon Aloun Ndombet-Assamba, Jamaica’s High Commissioner to the UK, and Sir Richard Ottaway, former chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. It has been noted that all the speakers for the proposition were people of colour, while all those speaking for the opposition were white.

Brenda Njiru, a member of Secretary’s Committee, posted her response in a Facebook status, commenting, “Tonight I was horrified to see these posters at the Oxford Union bar. They were being used to promote the cocktails for tonight’s debate on ‘This House Believes Britain owes reparations to its former colonies’. I cannot fathom how one would deem it acceptable to display images of a marked up slave, with the caption ‘Colonial Comeback’, in an attempt to make light humour of the atrocities being debated tonight.

“As a member of the committee, I’m thoroughly disappointed with the Union and I demand an explanation from the relevant powers as to how such an advert was printed. Furthermore, I am disappointed that there was no statement made either by the President or Vice-President, during their business, on a matter that caused upset to members of the Union.”

A statement on the Oxford Union Facebook page said, “The Union would once again like to apologise for the cocktail last night. We let a lot of people down: the cocktail and its flyer were entirely inappropriate, and offensive. We must ensure that this never happens again.

“The individual responsible has apologised and deeply regrets their actions.

“All future cocktails will now be brought to the Standing Committee each week to ensure they have been seen and voted on by the committee, to avoid such an incident ever being repeated.

“This situation should never have arisen. We apologise sincerely.”

It is not clear who the responsible individual referred to is. At the time of publication, the Oxford Union could not be reached for comment.

Summer VIIIs 2015 round-up: Thursday

0

Fast, furious and at points maddeningly frustrating, day two of Summer VIIIs came and went in a blur. There were few great shocks but some moments of intense drama in what is shaping up to be a ferocious VIIIs week in the lower divisions.

The dominance of Oriel continues in men’s rowing as Christ Church struggled to put them under pressure. Crossing the finish line about three and a half lengths ahead of House, the Tortoises seem to be staring at a comfortable headship. Real excitement came as Magdalen in fourth went for the swipe on Pembroke, missing the Pink Panthers by the narrowest of margins. With two days to go could we see Pembroke drop to fourth place if Magdalen can nab them tomorrow? Behind them Wolfson sustained their quality from Wednesday, bumping Trinity comfortably.

Over on the women’s side Wadham once again looked like they were in a different league. Easily ahead of the next crew by double digit lengths. There was a great deal of turnover at the top of women’s division one as Pembroke W1 moved up to second at the expense of John’s and Magdalen bumped up into fourth, demoting Teddy Hall. Further down Oriel W1 were involved in a thrilling chase with Hertford with New closing behind. New struck just as Oriel went for the bump, consolidating their sudden rise from second in division two to eleventh in division one.

In the middle divisions there was a little less frenetic action. Mansfield M2 disappointed expectations, rowing over as LMH eluded them. Green Templeton W1 managed to rise from second in division four to the foot of division three with two bumps on Pembroke W2 and Linacre W2. As we write, a good number of bumps remain disputed on the women’s side, especially in divisions two and three. It’ll be particularly interesting to see what happens to Wolfson II in division three who supposedly bumped LMH W1 and Hugh’s W1 in division two who may have succumbed to Mansfield W2.

Some of the more dramatic bumping took place at the foot of the river as Catz W3 continue their climb from the bottom rung as they bumped Exeter II. A little further up Mansfield W2 seemed intent on matching the achievements of their male counterpart on Wednesday, rising from fifth in division six to second. With Oriel W3 striking the bank, Hugh’s W3 seized the chance and exacted revenge on the Blessed Virgins for their bump the day before. This then cleared the way for a Mansfield overbump on Univ W3 who plummeted down to fifth in division six.  

The bottom men’s division held fewer surprises, crews largely repeating their performance from the previous day. Mansfield M3 complete their journey to the foot of the river with a bump from Jesus M4, and New M4, Balliol M3 and Oriel M4 continue to jump up places. Spare a thought for Hugh’s M2 however whose disastrous Summer VIIIs campaign continued. A punchy Keble M3 bumped Linacre M2 to claim the prestigious mantle of sandwich boat for division seven and capitalised, ramming Hugh’s. Just to be clear, that means this Hugh’s crew has dropped six places in two days. Not quite a repeat of the St Anne’s W2’s 23 place dropping performance at Torpids, but there are still two days left.

Further up Mansfield M2’s reign of terror came to an abrupt end. Having climbed five places from the foot of division six yesterday, Pembroke M4 managed to squeeze out a bump. It will be interesting to see if Mansfield just stagnate now or continue to push on up such a variable division.

Like the women, men’s division five saw less excitement, crews either rowing over or managing one place rises. Christ Church M3 continued their steady descent whilst Queen’s M2 look like they are on for blades.

We’ll be back later with video coverage of Thursday’s turmoil on the river. For now content yourself with this broadcast of yesterday’s mayhem.

Professor Louise Richardson nominated as new Vice-Chancellor

0

Professor Louise Richardson has been nominated as the new Vice-Chancellor of the University. The university panel to select the new Vice-Chancellor, chaired by Chancellor Lord Patten, nominated Richardson on the basis of her “strong commitment to the educational and scholarly values which Oxford holds dear”. The nomination is now subject to the approval of Congregation, the University’s parliament.

Commenting on her nomination, Richardson said, “ I feel enormously privileged to be given the opportunity to lead this remarkable institution during an exciting time for higher education. I am very much looking forward to working with talented, experienced, and dedicated colleagues to advance Oxford’s pre-eminent global position in research, scholarship, and teaching.”

Current Vice-Chancellor Andrew Hamilton will step down in at the beginning of next year to take up his new position at New York University.

More to follow.  

Summer VIIIs 2015 round-up: Wednesday

0

So at long last we’re here. After all the waiting, Summer VIIIs 2015 has finally arrived. With passions running high, and tales of egregious kit, brand new boats and early morning training plans to make even the hardiest blue quake, floating up and down the Isis, it is time all the hype turned into action. Would the dominance of Oriel men come to an end? Would Wadham’s women just plough off into the horizon? Were Keble all they appear on paper?

In the end the men’s division one yielded few great surprises. The real excitement was Christchurch pursuing Pembroke in their glistening new Ultimate Super Predator boat. House finally caught ‘Broke just after boathouse island after the Pink Panthers’ cox made the rash decision to ‘run’ rather than stick to the racing line. With Oriel comfortably over four lengths ahead it looks like Christchurch will be hard pushed to catch them tomorrow. The rest of division one saw rowovers, save for Keble’s demolition of Catz and an impressively pacey performance from Teddy Hall who took down Worcester.

Over in the women’s first division Wadham looked unstoppable. The action took place three places behind as Pembroke redeemed their men’s bump by ramming into Teddy Hall. It will be interesting to see if the ‘Broke women can catch John’s in second and then challenge Wadham as the week pans out. Midway down the division a resolute University crew overcame Balliol, bumping the crew containing Isis superwoman Caryn Davies, only the most decorated athlete ever to row in the Boat Race. It was a nail-biting showdown along boat house island as Balliol closed on Christ Church just as Univ took the bump. The biggest shock in the upper echelons of women’s bumps came from New however, who came from nowhere at second in division two to bump Merton and then Somerville from the sandwich boat.

As ever with bumps racing what really caught everyone’s attentions were the shenanigans unfolding in the lower divisions. Men’s division four saw two surprise bumps for St Antony’s, and John’s Men II managed a similar feat to New W1, only this time in division five, jumping from second in the division to bottom of division four. Hugh’s M2 perhaps had the worst day of all, the victims of a double overbump, as Mansfield M2 rose from five places behind at the foot of division six.

In a close second were Benet’s who bumped Wadham III, three places ahead of them to rise from first in division six to eleventh in division five, Wadham M3 crashing down a division. Division seven for the men saw less drama than usual though Oriel’s supposedly formidable ‘hood’s oarsman’ boat danced with danger before bumping Keble IV as they narrowly avoided colliding with the bank.

The big winner of the day was undoubtedly Pembroke WIII who managed a meteoric rise from second in division six to ninth in division five. Two bumps from Linacre from division three to two was also particularly impressive.

That’s all for today folks – we’ll be back tomorrow with more plus a Cherwell TV round-up of the day. 

General Election: the morning after

0

Presenters: Jamie Gardiner, Charlie Cartiglia, Clarissa Jones, Guy Bennett-Jones

#NotGuilty: I am proud

0

TW: Sexual assault

When I was younger I lost my sister. I think that made me more mature for my age. See, I’m already blaming myself. But I had a best friend and we shared almost everything together. She was my ultimate best friend, the sort of girl and friend you rarely ever meet. She knows what you’re thinking before you think it. She knows what’s wrong before you say it. Your sense of humour aligns. I was always slightly worried about her. And I guess due to the passing of my sister, I wanted to protect her and always make sure she was okay.

Her father was very invasive. He was always there, in a creepy way. Most people commented on it. We got on. And my best friend and him got on. Although he told her about his numerous affairs, they got on. He bought us alcohol and cigarettes, and let us do what we wanted. We could watch anything we wanted, and not be told otherwise. He wasn’t much of a parent to be honest.

The first time it happened, my best friend and I were watching Pretty Woman together on the sofa. He came back, drunk, and got under the blanket. I felt horrendously nauseous, I don’t know why. Maybe it was a premonition. He wouldn’t move his hand away when I tried to make him. I kept pushing his hand away and he wouldn’t move it. The next few times I went round nothing of the sort happened again.

Then one day I was in the kitchen and he attacked me again, forcefully. I have flashbacks now and I can see it. This happened on and off for a period of six months. I used to try different approaches to stop him, but nothing seemed to work. One of the most significant times was in the bathroom, because of the mirror, I could see what was happening to my body and I fought more than ever. I have issues now washing my face and brushing my teeth but I’m okay now, more so than I used to be about it. 

I think it became a way of life really. I think I was so concerned that he was doing it to my best friend as well that I used to try and protect her all of the time. But it wasn’t possible. I didn’t know what to do. I didn’t feel like my body or my mind belonged to me anymore. I just felt very sad, very confused and very isolated. I felt trapped and I felt alone. It has still affected me now. I’m a bit funny with food. I get nightmares a lot and flashbacks and I am on the edge quite a lot. But after they went on holiday for a week I realised my life didn’t have to be like that. I protected myself, and I moved away from her.

I told another friend about a year later, a few since then, and my mum when I was 19. It is the hardest thing I have ever been through or could imagine anyone going through. It is your whole normality and your entire body, what you live in, taken away from you. I don’t think many people truly realise the daily effects.

But, even though this is all very morbid and very sad, I have found that in this world there are absolutely amazing men and women that help you, inspire you, and don’t let you give up. Day in and day out. There are so many resources that are there for you. And life is so so precious and I am so so lucky in so many ways. I am so proud of my entire family and my entire existence. I have grown up and away from my trauma. It is in my fabric now, it is a part of my past, but it is not in my present. I am proud to be a woman, and I am proud to be a survivor of such an atrocity, so I can have more compassion and a greater insight into the mechanics of our existence as human beings.

We are all capable of being who we want to be and who we work at being.

What does it mean to be happy?

0

What does it mean to be happy? A good question, indeed, and one that the newly-founded Oxford branch of Students for Happiness decided to explore. In an event held at St John’s College auditorium, three big names came together to attempt to give an answer to this question on Monday 18 May.

I say attempt because a) no one truly gave an answer to this question b) I don’t think anyone in the world knows the answer to this except for the few arseholes who post happiness quotes as their Facebook status every two hours and c) even if the three speakers did manage to give a valid answer when I wasn’t paying attention, we’re still Oxford students and odiously unhappy about everything, particularly about walking to anything more than 5 minutes away.

Nevertheless, it was an extremely well-attended and successful event. Please ignore my pessimism, as I now take on board the happiness life tips that the speakers imparted on us. If, like me, you weren’t familiar with the speakers, then let me reassure you that they are actually BNOCs in the realm of positive psychology. We first heard from Nic Marks, an infectiously-smiley and truly likeable ‘happiness researcher’, which is a glorified term for someone who gathers data on wellbeing, but is more than just a walking calculator. He came up with the Happy Planet Index, which looks at which countries are the happiest in the world. Spoiler alert: Britain didn’t top the list. He also founded Happiness Works, which looks at ways to change institutional structure to make people happier and have a better quality of life. To prove his BNOC status, he even has a TED talk discussing the Happy Planet Index, but surprisingly he hasn’t got a Wikipedia page.

Nic Marks talks for while about the evidence that happiness helps you live longer, make more money, and have a longer-lasting marriage. Of course, at this point, we were all convinced, and the audience was practically begging him to tell us how to obtain this happiness. And he did. The secret to wellbeing is to connect to others, be active, give time and be generous to others, learn something new each day, and take notice of things around you. Seems easy, no? But then I realise that there are some days that I spend without having spoken to another person face-to-face. Exercising is anathema to me. Running on a tight schedule and on an even tighter student budget stops me being generous with either time or money. While I learn something new every day, am I learning new things for my own mental growth and development or because I’m desperate to pass the next exam? How can I focus on the things around me when I need to think about when I next have time in between work to tidy my room, call my parents, message a friend, and write that damn Cherwell article? It’s tough, but Nic Marks makes it sound manageable, and I’ll no doubt bear in mind his tips the next time things get tough.

Our next speaker, Mark Williams, conversely, has a Wikipedia page, and an inexhaustible CV to go with it, but no TED talk. Supposedly always coming out of his retirement from being professor of Clinical Psychology at Oxford to giving talks at happiness, psychology, and mindfulness events. Professor Williams talked about what mindfulness is and even gave us a cheeky taster of several minutes of mindfulness meditation. One definition of mindfulness is that it is the practice of paying attention to the here and now. It is a form of awareness, of focusing on your breathing, bodily sensations, thoughts, and feelings, and concentrating on what is happening moment by moment, rather than allowing your mind to wander to the regrets of the past. Mark Williams has even designed a whole new type of psychotherapy based on it – mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) – and it is now recommended by the NHS for recurrent major depression.

Our final speaker was Miriam Akhtar, UK’s leading positive psychologist. Her goal differs from a clinical psychologist who might take one from a depressed state to a functional state, whereas her ambition is to make people happy, satisfied with their life, and feel fulfilled and with a sense of purpose. Miriam Akhtar says that to get to wellbeing, it involves playing to your strengths, developing resilience, and building optimism. It’s important to be grateful, think of the good things in your life, and to have positive relationships. She emphasised that we as human beings are social animals and part of developing positive relationships is to remember the reasons that you value the people around you in your life. One of the most striking things she mentions is that she has kept a ‘gratitude journal’ since she was a teenager, writing in it every day about the things that she is grateful about in her life.

At the end of the talks, the chair, Dr Sophie Bostock, asked each of the panel to give advice to students. Their advice include getting the balance between work and play, playing to your strengths and knowing what your strengths are, reading more novels, especially after university life, trying lots of novel activities, sleeping more, going on walks when something is bothering you, and taking more breaks.

One last thing I took away from the talk was that it is important to have emotional depth. The speakers all agree that happiness isn’t about being happy all the time, but it is about accepting and acknowledging your fears, sadness, anger, and not letting those negative emotions and thoughts overwhelm you.

You can watch a video of the talk here:

Caroline Rush on the British fashion industry

0

It seems that whether you’re Fashion Editor of the Cherwell, or Editor-in-Chief of Vogue, you are plagued by people who are doggedly dismissive of the fashion industry, often to the point of denial. Annoyingis the word Anna Wintour used to describe this phenomena, speaking at the Union last term.

Other words come to my mind, but if I wanted to convert one of these deniers I’d call upon Caroline Rush, who spoke this term to the Oxford Guild. Rush is Chief Executive of the British Fashion Council (BFC), which, in its own words, “is committed to developing excellence and growth in a sector that is a significant contributor to the British economy.” According to the 2014 report from none other than the Oxford Economics department, that’s a £46 billion contributor, to be precise.

But in spite of the figures, Rush and the BFC are no strangers to the industry’s deniers. In her talk Rush recounts how
the BFC, throughout its history, has had to prove to politicians that the industry is “much more beyond a few clothes on a shelf”.

Politicians prove to be less of a problem today thanks to the BFC’s “voice within Number Ten”: Samantha Cameron. “There is no other country that has that engagement [between their government and fashion council],” Rush informs me.

If all the world’s a catwalk, Samantha Cameron
isn’t the only mem
ber of the establishment that is promoting British fashion globally. Having just got back from America when we spoke, just before the birth of the royal baby, Rush can attest to the pulling power of the Princess across the pond.

Kate Middleton’s dress always attracts attention, whether it’s a see-through student-made dress, a Sarah Burton designed wedding dress or a maternity dress from ASOS. “We hear all these anecdotal stories,” Rush tells me. “She wore the dress, it sold out online within an hour and immediately they were asking for additional orders. Imagine the impact that can have on a small designer business, even a big designer business.”

As much as the BFC’s work is taking British fashion abroad, Rush emphasises the importance of attracting young international talent to Britain, to be trained at “the very best colleges in the world”. Unfortunately, due to visa challenges, once these designers have been trained in Britain, some of them cannot stay here. This is something that “is constantly on the agenda” when the BFC are talking to the government.
Young international designers are a vital part of Britain’s notoriously different fashion DNA, which is part off-the-wall innovation, part history and heritage.
Rush has successfully brought big brands like Burberry back to London Fashion Week, making London a stop and not just a stop-over between New York and Paris during fashion month.

But I wonder whether with new fashion weeks popping up all over the map – as Rush says, “It’s always fashion week somewhere,” – the BFC feels added pressure with each season of London Fashion Week to keep up the cool factor. “I wouldn’t say we’re complacent,” Rush replies. Neither would I; this season they are moving from historical Somerset House to a car park in Soho.

It is still in London, though, where the industry’s buyers and press are. When I ask whether this British style we’ve been talking about would be more aptly described as London style, Rush is quick to assure me that despite its location, the BFC is not completely London- centric. Was it the style Rush saw growing up in Manchester? It certainly wasn’t the one I saw growing up in Coventry – a city with a wonderful array of deserted car parks I should note. Car parks and style aside, it is something the BFC are working on.

“We just did a pilot program in February with Marks and Spencer, to think about how they could support us and take content out to the regions. At the moment the physical presence of some of our retail partners is actually one of the best ways for us to communicate about the BFC.”

Perhaps the more the British public learn about the BFC and its work, the fewer deniers we will have to face. And abroad? Well, they have “a brilliant network of Brits in the industry around the world” for that, like Anna Wintour for a start.