Wednesday 16th July 2025
Blog Page 1205

Ten reasons we’re apparently losing the ability to love

0

As I scroll through my Facebook newsfeed, I see someone has linked an article entitled ‘10 Reasons Why This Generation is Losing the Ability To Be in Love’. Regrettably, I click on it. What I am greeted with is 1391 words on why our generation is a mess. (That is, apart from the writer of course, who knows what’s what).

The claim? We don’t understand love any more, and are moving away from those healthy “conventional takes on romantic, loving relationships”. Fittingly, the article begins with a heterosexual couple sitting in a field, the man looking off into the distance as the woman rests her head on his back. How sweet. 

And so I reach number one on why we can’t feel anymore:

1. We care more about instant gratification than anything else. Interesting. If we want food we order or go out. This confused me a little, as I am very used to observing students lugging Tesco or Sainsbury’s bags back to their respective homes. But I must be wrong. Put your saucepans away, you won’t be using them. If we are bored, we only turn to phone apps. And if we need directions then we ask our phone. To get places this is infinitely more effective, but apparently that is just simply not the point. It’s not the point because these modes of instant gratification, which may seem helpful, actually seep into our love lives. Like a disease. He doesn’t say how, but they do. 

2. We’ve built a culture driven by drugs and booze. Okay, yes, some of us like to drink and/or dabble. But apparently they are our medication. We turn to substances. And these are love’s “worst enemy”. Because they give us the illusion of an alternate reality. In this reality, we believe our emotions are “heightened”. Hangovers are not for complaining about our antics, they are the weight of believing we are absent from a superior substance reality where we can love greater. Oh Gin, let me escape to my portal of love once more. 

However, the author knows the reality. And he tells us that oh no, this is not love. 

3. We sleep around a lot. Okay. Most individuals have “multiple partners every year”. The author likes sex, he confirms, but having sex outside of a relationship only makes you feel “empty”. Nope, it’s not liberating. All it does is make you feel alone. AND worse than that, it stops you from finding love. You are not just wasting your time having sex, when you could be searching for your soul mate, but you are turning sex into a SPORT. And when that happens, ”Good luck trying to make love.” Because once you’ve slept around, sex stops being special ever. It is “trivial”. You will never love. You will start going to ‘sex’ practice, and buy a metaphorical sex racket, and you will be alone. “Good luck”. (That’s nice that he wishes you luck though.)

4. We’re becoming even more egocentric. He admits this is part of human nature, but the problem is nowadays we are failing to feel empathy. Relationships, he points out, are a lot like communities. And when we are so self-obsessed, how are we meant to be successfully in a relationship? 

5. We date for the sake of dating. Apparently this is a 2000s thing. No, Austen, get back in your grave, you are wrong. There was no compulsive courting, no desperation to get daughters married. Nope, it’s only now that dating has become excessive. It’s not just sex that’s a sport. So is dating. And it’s stopping us from finding love. 

6. We aren’t fans of compromises. He doesn’t really explain why or when we apparently evolved to this state, but we have. And in a relationship we are just as greedy and narrow-minded.

7. We believe in fairytale endings. Apparently Disney was the beginning of fairy tales. And that taught us what love is. But this is giving us “incredibly inaccurate” expectations. Cinderella getting a carriage from a pumpkin? Guys, it’s just not going to happen. We are doomed to question our love, when we can’t ever achieve walking off into the sunset in our tiaras. 

8: We’ve been fooled into believing perfection is attainable. We are all looking for someone perfect, and to be perfect. Sure, perfection can be pretty desirable. But when did that become an issue specifically of our generation?

9. We’re goal-driven, and often forget our partners. Another claim which astounds me in its impressive lack of examples. We do not understand what is valuable. Instead, we put off finding someone to love until everything else is 100 per cent tickedy-boo. (Whilst still somehow managing to adhere to 5. and dating manically). He isn’t “sure why no one realises finding a partner is the most importance piece of the puzzle”. The puzzle of life that is. Drop your ambitions. First you need to be settled in love, THEN you can write that novel, research ion-imaging photo dissociation dynamics, or go travelling. Duh.

And the happy conclusion? 

10. Most of us are really bad at loving. It turns out we can’t get a grasp on love. And if we can’t understand it, we will never be happy. He fails to point out that there is no single type of love, and its complexity, elusiveness and individuality between person and people is the most wonderful thing about it. 

A final footnote: Perhaps my sardonicism is a tad too harsh. Or perhaps it’s encouraging that this list does not hysterically strike my (ever diminishing) heart. I’m too busy happily feeling emotions, and I am pretty damned sure I am not the anomaly on this.

Our fascination with procrastination

Slumped in my chair, dreary-eyed and facing my computer, my essay title glares back at me. It’s been two hours since I typed it into an empty Word document, and nothing has been added since. In that time, I’ve reorganised my entire collection of notes. I’ve written three to-do lists. I’ve made coffee – properly, in a cafetière. But as the clock ticks me closer to my deadline, I know I’m just making life more difficult for myself. So why is it so impossible to start? 

Procrastination is a chronic condition of the modern world. Professor Piers Steel of the Haskayne School of Business at the University of Calgary found that 95 per cent of us procrastinate at some point – putting off everything from Christmas shopping to paying the bills. Students are perhaps the worst offenders: with so much free time and so many deadlines it’s an easy trap to fall into. 

Contrary to popular belief, procrastinators show no differences in their ability to estimate time or plan. They are well aware of how much time they have left, or how they should manage their workload, but there is simply a mental barrier to getting started. Dr Ferrari, Associate Professor of Psychology at De Paul University in Chicago, explains it well, “Telling someone who procrastinates to buy a weekly planner is like telling someone with chronic depression to just cheer up.” 

No one is born a procrastinator. It is an indirectly learnt trait that often results from a particular upbringing. Authoritarian parenting styles are particularly likely to elicit such a response. Controlling parents can prevent their children from developing the ability to regulate themselves, or simply cause them to rebel. 

Under these conditions, however, procrastinators often turn to their friends for support, who may be tolerant of their excuses and hence reinforce the trait. 

But not all procrastinators are created equal. Dr Ferrari identifies three categories of procrastination, of which you may find yourself slotting into a few. Thrill-seekers enjoy the rush they get from completing work under a tight, last-minute schedule. Avoiders have such a fear of failure and what others will think of them and because of it, they actually seek the impaired work that procrastinating will bring them. They would rather people think they lack effort than ability. Decisional procrastinators just can’t make a decision and not doing so saves them from responsibility for the outcome of events. 

Ultimately, however, the reason we procrastinate is to avoid a certain amount of pain – be it the unpleasantness of spending a night reading chapters of a dull book, or watching the money drain from your bank account as you pay your bills. Procrastinating allows us to enter a comfort zone with instant gratification, and often this is all it takes to dominate the rational part of our mind that knows it would be best to get the work over with. 

While the odd essay crisis after an extended binge on Netflix is normal and most likely expected, chronic procrastination can have serious impacts on your health. Procrastinating university students show evidence of compromised immune systems, gastrointestinal problems and insomnia. 

The problems can even extend to others. Shifting the burden of responsibility onto your peers breaks down relationships and can have dire consequences for teamwork. 

Although procrastination is virtually a fact of life, it can be overcome by relatively simple strategies. Breaking down your work into smaller chunks is usually the first step and is one of the easiest ways to make a task feel more manageable. The added gratification of succeeding in meeting each of your deadlines is a great motivator and can make the end of a project feel more tangible. Beating procrastination can often require a change in attitude, too. For those who use the excuse of perfectionism, it is important to learn to accept that it is okay if things aren’t perfect and realise that a completed task, even if it didn’t turn out exactly how you’d like, is infinitely better than nothing at all. 

One thing all procrastinators can benefit from is trying to focus on the success and positive feelings that are achieved on completing a task. There is no doubt that a night out following a completed essay feels a whole lot better than trying to enjoy yourself with the niggling fear of a rapidly impending deadline. Changing such seemingly hard-wired behaviour takes work, but it is certainly not impossible. There is, however, one thing to remember in all this: you can’t procrastinate forever.

Powercuts cause chaos for Merton students

0

A power cut across areas of Central Oxford on Monday 27th April caused chaos for some Merton College students who were locked out of their accommodation on Holywell Street, with some preparing to take exams the following day.

The power first cut out at around 4pm on Monday afternoon. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution, which supplies energy to the Oxford area, originally gave an estimated time of 6.30pm for the issue to be resolved, but this was later revised to 1am on Tuesday morning.

Other colleges such as Wadham, Hertford and New were also affected, while the eduroam Internet service was unavailable to many students for large parts of the evening.

However, it was Merton students living in Holywell who were the hardest hit, as doors to the accommodation are locked and unlocked electronically, leaving many locked out and forced to ask porters to let them in manually.

Hannah Wilson, a second year Chemistry undergraduate at Merton, told Cherwell, “At first I thought it was just my house, so I grabbed my dying phone and charger to go and borrow a friend’s electricity. I then realised that a Merton migration was starting, as people abandoned their power-less rooms for libraries, so it was evidently the whole of Holywell Street.

“The problem was, most of the Merton accommodation has an electric locking system, which means that once people had left the house, they couldn’t get back in, and had to rely on one person being in the house at all times, to run down and open the door.”

The electricity was restored to Holywell houses 1 to 7 by 9pm on the Monday evening, though the rest of the Street remained without power until 1:11am on the Tuesday morning.

Another Merton second year, studying Biology, who was taking an exam the following morning, described how students were revising by torchlight, saying, “Everyone went out to buy dinner as obviously ovens, fridges, freezers, microwaves, kettles, toasters wouldn’t work. My phone and laptop both ran out of battery. After dinner, a few of us went to Holywell 1 as they had electricity in the evening, and I worked there and charged my phone. As I have exams at the moment this was great – I had been trying to work in my room from torch light but being so dark was really not conducive to a good working environment.”

Even after the power was restored early on Tuesday morning, some students in the affected area were still unable to connect to the Internet until around 9am. A University spokesperson stressed to Cherwell that the power outage was out of the control of the university’s IT services, which had responded as soon as possible. “Loss of power across such a large area and for such a long time is exceptional, and the University is still waiting to find out from the electricity board what caused the problem,” they said.

“While the University’s IT Service did everything it could to minimise the impact of the power outage, the scale and timing of the outage meant that it took longer than expected to restore full service back to the network.”

Not everyone was downbeat about the inconvenience, however. A staff member at the King’s Arms, on the corner of Holywell Street, told Cherwell how the pub had stayedd open by candlelight until 10pm, before closing two hours earlier than the usual time of midnight. “Everyone loved it,” he said. “They said we should do it more often!”

Duncan MacDonald, a spokesperson for Scottish and Southern Energy, was unable to provide the exact cause of the outage. He said, “Our priority was, as always, to get the power back on for our customers as quickly and as safely as possible.”

Network Rail cancels NUS ‘Liar Liar’ posters

0

Network Rail ordered the removal of National Union of Students (NUS) posters displayed at UK railway stations on the night of Thursday 23rd April. The posters were considered to discourage people from voting Lib Dem in the forthcoming General Election.

The posters had been on display for just one day. The NUS had paid for the posters to remain in place until after 7th May.

A Network Rail spokesperson said, “As a politically-neutral organisation, we do not allow political activity on our stations and this applies to any form of advertising or campaigning. In this instance, it is clear that an error has been made… We will be apologising to the NUS for the misunderstanding and will ensure that they do not have to pay for the display.”

NUS President Toni Pearce condemned the move as a “mass gagging attempt on students”.

The NUS has come under heavy criticism since the recent launch of its ‘Liar Liar’ campaign which cost around £40,000.

Matt Sumption, the Co-Chair of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats, stated, “This campaign does nothing for the widely held impression that the NUS is merely a campaign group for young Labour students, rather than an organisation that represents all students in the UK. This year the NUS could not find the money for a full-time Trans Students Officer, but could find £40,000 for a one-sided political campaign that is subject to legal challenge.”

In seeking to tackle accusations of partisanship, Toni Pearce said,“NUS has always believed that politicians from all political parties should be accountable for the decisions, but also the promises they make.”

She added, “This campaign isn’t about party politics – it’s about holding MPs accountable for the decisions they make in office and the promises they made when they were a candidate so that no one can get elected by telling lies.”

A Lib Dem spokesperson said, “There will be some people who will judge us for one thing we could not do. But many fair minded people will judge us by what we have been able to do: tax cuts for millions of working people, more money for poor children in schools; a record two million apprentices, equal marriage, shared parental leave and many more policies that have made Britain fairer.”

Oxford students back Labour ahead of election

0

Oxford students are most likely to vote Labour according to Cherwell’s survey of students’ voting intentions for the General Election. The poll, which surveyed 1,071 Oxford student residents, revealed that 31.6 per cent of students plan to vote for the Labour party, while only 24.2 per cent are intending to back the Conservatives.

Labour support did vary across the two Oxford constituencies with only 25 per cent of Labour supporters planning to vote in Oxford West and Abingdon, compared to 31.4 per cent in Oxford East. Conversely, just 20.3 per cent of Conservative supporters plan to vote in Oxford East compared to 29 per cent in Oxford West and Abingdon, which could be owed to tactical voting on the part of both sets of supporters.

Labour MP Andrew Smith has held the seat in Oxford East since 1987 and Oxford West and Abingdon is considered most likely to be retained by Nicola Blackwood, who is representing the Conservative party.
Amongst the colleges with a majority supporting Labour, St Hilda’s, Pembroke, Mansfield, and Wadham all revealed a higher proportion of Labour voters than Balliol College — renowned previously for its support for the Labour Party.

In 14 colleges, the majority of students planned to vote Conservative, with St John’s, Christ Church, Somerville and Brasenose College revealing relatively large majorities. There was also strong university-wide support for the Green Party, for whom 15 per cent of students said they plan to vote.

Wadham College expressed the highest proportion of support for the Greens, where 28 per cent of students intend to vote for the party. 63 per cent of Wadham students said they plan to vote for either the Green or Labour parties.

Contrary to the NUS’ ‘Liar Liar’ campaign and controversy over tuition fees, the Liberal Democrats still received support above the national average, with 19 per cent of students in Oxford West and Abingdon saying they would vote Lib Dem, versus 11 per cent in Oxford East.

UKIP support, however, proved much lower than the national figure, with just 4.1 per cent of students saying they plan to vote for the party.
Students were most preoccupied with welfare policy, with 23.8 per cent declaring it the most important issue. This was followed by the NHS, which 16.6 per cent of students prioritised.

Although social welfare proved the main concern of Labour voters, those planning to vote Conservative placed most importance on government borrowing.

David Parton, the Publicity Officer for the Oxford University Labour Club, commented, “These results come following Labour’s successful performance in a recent Oxford Student poll of voting intention, and with policies such as cutting tuition fees to £6,000 a year, increasing the maintenance grant from £3,400 to £3,800 a year for students from families who pay basic rates of income tax and banning unpaid internships, Labour is showing that it is listening to the voices of students, who were so badly betrayed by not only the spinelessness of the Liberal Democrats, but also the callousness of the Tories.”

Syed Imam, Senior Co-Chair of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats commented, “It’s no surprise that, in one of the most marginal seats in this election, students are choosing to back Layla Moran, the Liberal Democrat candidate and local physics teacher, who is the only candidate who can defeat the Conservative incumbent.

“The Tory MP here has voted against same-sex marriage and in favour of limiting information for women considering abortion, and is being actively supported in this election by the pro-fox hunting lobby. In contrast, Layla has taken a firm stance against the Conservatives on each of these issues, against the pro-hunting lobbyists, and will, as MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, act as a better representative on issues such as these, which students feel very strongly about.”

OUCA did not respond to Cherwell’s request for comment.

A view from the cheap seat

0

RE: Urgent rehearsal schedule!!!
So I just wanted to say what an amazing job everybody’s been doing so far, but we have a few issues to take care of…

So we kinda forgot to mention but tomorrow we have the opening night. And like I know the first night is just like a dry run, but still its probably best if we knew at least some of the lines. Now I know what you’re gonna say after we told you we were going to make a really different kind of a production with no rules and boundaries. The thing is, as useful as it was to connect with your childhood by nostalgia binging on ‘Mr Brightside’ during rehearsal, the management of the theatre said if we go too (literally) off book they’ll sue us… Talk about the #patriarchy right? Don’t worry, tho I’ve got the OUSU strike squad booked for a hit after our run is finished. Anyway I’ve put together an intensive schedule to get back on track .

11:00: Wake up
12:00: Group brunch, bitch about who 
slept with who after yesterday’s rehearsal

13:00: Watch the Polanski version of Macbeth

15:00: Watch the Orson Wells version of Macbeth

15:30: The director will read through his sixth form essay ‘Shakespeare and Society’ followed by a live Q and A on Twitter and an intensive discussion group

16:00: Photos with the director and his essay, (limited edition signed copies will be on offer)

16:30: Loose leaf tea break at TSK (no cof- fee on the day of the show!)

18:00: Post rehearsal yoga de stress

Open to suggestions afterwards, maybe we can go to Blackwell’s and pick up some scripts before the show??

 

Preview: Living Together

0

Another student production comes to the Oxford playhouse and once again its sure to be a must see. A tragicomedy chronicling a single household’s weekend in July, Living Together captures the tensions of family life.

It is part of The Norman Conquests trilogy by Tony and Olivier Award-winning playwright Alan Ayckbourn. Annie (Lizzy Mansfield), the youngest of three siblings, has stayed at home to care for her mother (Rebecca Hamilton), but asks for the help of her brother Reg (James Aldred) and sister-in-law Sarah (Sarah Mat- thews) when she plans to spend a weekend away with the philandering Norman (Freddie Bowerman). Complications arise as Norman’s wife Ruth (Mary Higgins), who also happens to be Annie’s sister, arrives, adding to the general frenzy.

In the midst of the chaos is Annie’s meek fiancée Tom (James Watson), who seems to have trapped Annie in an “eternal engagement” with his indecisive and clueless demeanor. Ten-sions continue to rise as the weekend unfolds and past experiences take their toll on the family.

Directors Laura Cull and Griffith Rees have had big ambitions for the production from the start, by trying to combine as many ele- ments as possible from all three parts of the trilogy into a single work. Characters rarely leave the stage in this naturalistic rendering, where even the character only mentioned in the script, the Mother, is given a voice in the improvised scenes.

While intimate conversations are going on in the living room, the audience will be able to see (and hear) the other characters walk- ing in the garden or talking in the bedroom. Discussions between varying characters will take place concurrently using ‘improv solutions’. The use of improv during rehearsals has served to create a fun atmosphere for the cast where each character is explored through past and present. In my time with the cast, I got to see the cast explore a time in the childhood of Reg, Ruth, and Annie. The improvised scene featured a time when the two girls came in after raking leaves while wounded Reg lay on the living room couch with a football injury next to Mother. This organic process has helped the cast build the lives of their characters memory by memory.

The set itself will feature products of these improv sessions, for example Annie’s childhood drawings or Reg’s paper airplanes in their respective bedrooms. The audience will get a taste of the meticulously crafted reality, and get an intimate view of how their individual decisions come to affect them all. Director Griffith Rees explains the importance of the set design, remarking, “It’s one thing to see a man seducing another man’s wife, but it’s entirely different to see a man seducing someone’s wife when you see the husband in the next room.”

With an energetic cast clearly devoted to the material, Living Together promises the audience a comprehensive view of Ayckbourn’s characters and their experiences.

 

 

 

 

Mr Spacey’s finest hour?

0

In his final role as Director of the Old Vic, Kevin Spacey reassumes the character of Clarence Darrow, providing a brilliant account of the Ohio-born civil-liberties lawyer who fought many cases on the behalf of those whose voices were being censored and suppressed. His career spanned an incredible 50 years at the bar, covering the holy trinity of controversy in his time: race, religion and politics.

The one-man play, written by David W. Rintels, gives a sober reflection of both sides of the USA’s history of political dissent, with government bullying presented alongside constitutional law as a means to limit it. Foremost a criminal defence lawyer, Spacey beautifully plays the emotional tumult of Darrow’s success: he never let a client receive the death penalty, but it regularly meant defending the lives of those he knew to be guilty of the most vile crimes. For instance, Darrow represented the two child- murderers Leopold and Loeb in what would be called the “Trial of the Century”. After a colossal 12 hour long closing speech, he managed to reduce their death sentence to life in prison.

The Tennessee ‘Monkey Trial’ is perhaps Darrow’s most well-known case, where he defended the right of a school teacher to teach evolution. Still in monologue, he re-lived the cross-exam- ination of a Biblical scholar, pondering how Cain acquired a wife if, of the three other people supposedly alive, the only woman was meant to be his mother Eve.

Yet the ‘Sweet Trials’ would be his real chal-lenge. In 1925, a black family of 11 were arrested on the charge of murder after a white mob tried to forcibly remove the family from their home. One member of the mob died. Darrow’s closing remarks (lasting around seven hours), implored the all-white jury to recognise a “Law of Love”, and thus convinced them to produce a verdict of not-guilty for one of thedefendants, as well as causing the charges to be dropped for the rest.

Spacey’s interpretation of the trial was extremely impressive. He harnessed the opportunities presented by the theatre in the round by using one corner of the audience as the imagined jury to which he passionately pleaded, and the front row of another to show how, after the verdict came through, Darrow shook the hand of every member of courtroom present (I was lucky enough to be amongst that front row).

Kevin Spacey’s portrayal of this hero of American liberalism is a refreshing change from his famous roles as arch-pragmatists, such as Richard III or Frank Underwood. The raw emotion of Spacey was incomparable, and leaving aside the unnecessary and emotionally manipulative tinkling piano that accompanied his exit at the ends of the two acts, this produc- tion was exemplary. Surely amongst Spacey’s greatest theatrical performances as both actor and director.

Framing May Day: Festival of Flowers

0

With May Day such an integral part of Oxford life, we were keen to capitalise on this for an editorial. For those of us who have already survived an Oxford May Day, the name summons up many, probably hazy, memories of what is necessary to pull an all-nighter. Of course amongst the recollections of increasingly fatigued dancing are the sounds of the beautiful Magdalen choir chiming at six o’clock in the morning. What’s often not thought about, however, are the origins of May Day. After a bit of research, we found out about the earliest May Day celebrations having ties to the Floralia, the Roman Goddess of Flowers, so we decided to use her as our fashion icon. Admittedly she probably doesn’t wear an eclectic mix of vintage and Topshop florals, nor bright pink lipstick, but Floralia was our inspiration nonetheless. 

Models: Nina Foster, Marie-Therese Alexis Png and Lucy Téa

Concept & Styling: Summer Taylor and Rosie Gaunt

Hair: Katie Jowett

Photographer: Holly Shackleton 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11597%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11598%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11599%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11600%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11601%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11602%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11603%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11604%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11605%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Behind the Scenes…

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11607%%[/mm-hide-text] 

About our phographer, Holly Shackleton, and her work…

“I am in my first year studying photography at London College of Communications. My practice fits mainly into conceptual and fine art. I came up with the flower-box method, used for this shoot, during my project for my foundation year. I created it because I’m interested in challenging both myself and pho- tography through exploring alternative processes. This is why I use my flower-box rather than the over- done method of photoshop. I first used this method to photograph derelict pubs. The flowers I used in my box were picked from just outside these pubs. I liked the idea of actually using flowers which had lived and flourished outside the dying pubs so that they could act as a wreath to the closed pubs in my photography. I think the flower-box method worked particularly well in this May Day and Festival of Flowers themed edito- rial because of the way the shine of the Perspex box lends a misty and ethereal glow to the photography of the models. Also, as Rosie and Summer put it, the slight hazy feel perfectly captures May Day celebrations!” 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11606%%[/mm-hide-text] 

 

 

 

Cricketers hit opponents for six

0

The beginning of Trinity term means different things to different people. For those who enjoy watching people dressed in white stand in fields for hours on end shouting silly phrases, it can mean one thing, and one thing only: the start of the cricket season.

Both male and female teams have started this season strongly, building on the runaway successes of last year. After a season which ended with the retention of the T-20, One-Day and Test varsity trophies, the men’s team decided to kick off their season with a tour of Sri Lanka, where new captain Matthew Winter and tour manager Bill Frewin led the Blues on a successful training and team building exercise. Birthplace of such cricket icons as Kumar Sangakkara and Sanath Jayasuriya, the unique conditions made for an interesting change for cricketers brought up on green wickets and overcast skies.

Starting in Kandy, going through the capital Colombo to the test ground of Galle, the Blues played a host of teams, beating St Antony’s College, the University of Peradeniya, St Peter’s College, and the University of Jayawardenepura. A tough test for the Blues followed, the fi nal games being played against a very strong club side from Maggona. In games fraught with excellent cricket and high drama, the heroics of Agarwal, Mylavarapu and O’Gorman were not enough to prevent narrow losses. Back on home soil, pre-season has kicked off with games against St Edward’s and Teddington, whilst a number of OUCC players have joined the Oxford MCC (joint Oxford and Oxford Brookes) team, gaining valuable first-class experience. Abidine Sakande topped off a memorable game against Surrey bygaining the scalp of game-changing batsman (and insuff erable egoist) Kevin Pietersen.

Looking forward to the season, Winter said, “Though we have lost a couple of very influential players, we have got some really exciting talent joining us. “Freshers such as Hughes, Gnodde, Claughton and Harrison have already made a real impact on the side, and our all-rounder Owain Jones has returned to us having missed last season, which strengthens the team considerably.”

The women’s team finished their 2014 season brilliantly by thrashing their Cambridge counterparts, winning the T-20 game by eight wickets before batting from Tina Gough, Ellie Bath and bowling from Ridhi Kashyap secured the One-Day varsity trophy comprehensively by 140 runs. The team kicked off the season with a resounding 166-run win against Cambridge on Wednesday 22nd April. The victory was led by superb contributions in particular from Eleanor Bath and debutante Sian Kelly with the bat, and fellow debutante Immy Brown with the ball.

Training hard all winter, captain Ellie Ingram and incoming President Ridhi Kashyap are “full of confidence” about continued success in both league and varsity, describing their squad as being composed of “talented returning and new players all eager to contribute”. In the ‘big-three’ family of established university sport, cricket can come across as the slightly awkward older sibling. A switch to pay-per-view television coverage and the recent stagnation of the England team have invariably damaged the state of cricket on a national level.

The successes of last year have demonstrated the thriving and active cricket scene at Oxford, which will hopefully translate into another double-sweep of varsity trophies this summer. It would be “wonderful”, says Winter, “if students came to watch the games this summer”. With both teams composed of experienced Blues and exciting young talent, from a full range of years and colleges, dedicated to playing (and winning) with an exciting brand of stylish cricket, I’m sure many will.