Thursday 9th April 2026
Blog Page 1252

Giving the thoughts of a Don: bad faith

0

Here’s a depressing thought that sometimes occurs to me: someone I teach may, one day, end up in a position of elected power. It’s not an unreasonable fear. The Houses of Parliament are stacked with former Oxford PPE students, shiny-faced and slick of hair, trumpeted by the University as proof of our continuing excellence. Many of our students seem halfway there already, constitutionally incapable of taking any stand on a position that matters. How long before one of them makes the journey from my tutorials to elected office?

The thought should be alluring. It offers philosophy, that most insecure of disciplines, the promise of political relevance. (‘Oxford Philosophy: shaping tomorrow’s leaders today.’) Plato tells us that politics needs philosophy, for “until philosophers rule as kings or those who are now called kings and leading men genuinely and adequately philosophise, that is, until political power and philosophy entirely coincide… cities will have no rest from evils”. The thought is that philosophy teaches wisdom, or at least the love of it, and the philosopher – wise and careful as she is – governs with an enhanced understanding of that which matters.

What a consoling thought! Perhaps the Russian philosopher Jan Sten thought as much when Stalin appointed him as his tutor. But three years of tutorials on Kant, Hegel, Fichte and Schelling seems not to have improved Stalin’s governance, even if one can’t help but sympathise with his frustrated query, familiar to any first-year philosophy student, “Who uses all this rubbish in practice?” Nor was the appointment a good one for Sten. Stalin derided him as a desperate sluggard, and he was eventually pronounced a lickspittle of Trotsky and shot.

This wouldn’t matter if philosophy were simply neutral. I once argued for the election of a philosopher rather than an economist to a Research Fellowship on the grounds that the philosopher at least would do no harm. (I was ignored.) But things may be worse. Prime amongst the ‘transferable skills’ so lauded by philosophy’s proselytisers are those of drawing careful distinctions, of paying attention to small but subtle differences between cases.

The development of these skills is thought to be central to a philosophical education. (‘Oxford Philosophy: training tomorrow’s thinkers today.’) And when used effectively, they allow a clarity of thought shocking in its brilliance and precision.

But they sometimes lapse into institutionally sanctioned pedantry. And when they do, they have analogues in a particular kind of self-deception, that involved in rationalising our bad behaviour. It is easy for a philosopher, trained in the making of distinctions, to distinguish lying from reticence, as Kant did, when writing to a suicidal correspondent. Lying is contrary to the moral law, he claimed; reticence on the other hand…

Here is one use for philosophical thinking: to draw distinctions that make one’s immoral conduct seem permissible, even praiseworthy. It is the kind of thinking which justifies claiming light bulbs on expenses or pressuring one’s spouse into taking one’s speeding points.

It is as if philosophy provides the tools which enable us to do all that we do whilst looking in the mirror and saying: yes, you’ve done good.

Let’s all play Cuppers Croquet

0

Even by the standards set by the Oxford sport scene, croquet is a silly sport. This summer sees the return of teams of eager students attempt to hit balls through hoops (not the basketball kind) by swinging a mallet (not the camping kind), all accompanied by the gaze of bemused tourists and the smell of badly mixed Pimm’s.

Still, the popularity of croquet continues to remain astronomically high, with over 400 teams and 1,600 contestants entering the com­petition in 2015. As such, the competition once again retains the crown of the most popular sporting event of the whole year. Croquet Cup­pers even claims to be the biggest collegiate sporting event in the world, attracting novice and seasoned talent alike.

With such a wide range of skills and abilities over such a vast number of teams, it is difficult to identify any runaway leaders this early in the season.

Captain Christopher Miller of Magdalen firsts enters the competition as the top seed, continuing a strong tradition of Magdalen croquet which builds on last year’s captain Peter Batley’s cup-winning team and sees them field 26 separate teams this year, though even this pales in comparison to last year’s 44 from Worcester.

Balliol also field a group of strong teams, built more off the back of their ‘great lawns and equipment rather than any actual merit,’ as one (clearly jealous) anonymous college captain says. Though there are seven rounds to go, what is clear from the opening stages is that the use of a handicap system (in league and Cuppers) allows newcomers to develop and gain confi­dence rapidly, with many teams of freshers now happily threatening more experienced groups.

The large number of freshers starting can be attributed to the sustained and effective efforts by the Oxford University Croquet Club to prevent people from being turned off by its apparent ridiculousness. The club encour­ages newcomers of every ability to start this engaging, skilful and sociable sport. With the lowest membership fee of any sport (£11 for the term, £23 for the entire summer with usage of full-size lawns and championship-grade equip­ment) and well-attended beginners demonstra­tion sessions, it’s no surprise so many people play croquet when they first get to Oxford.

“Weirdly,” explains OUCC President Mark van Loon, “what keeps people playing after that ini­tial first few games is how tactically aggressive it is – I like to think of it as a more sociable and relaxing type of chess.”

Though there is obviously a large step up between newcomers and the University team, Mark is keen to stress that the process from novice to University standard is something which can happen fairly quickly.

He tells me, “Cuppers is great for getting people involved and teaching technique, but a lot of people gain more experience by joining the university team at any level and learning how to plan their attack.” With good university players often able to limit their opponents to only one or two shots a game due to the lack of mistakes, “taking chances and staying cool under pressure is key.”

The University team seem to take this advice particularly on board, topping the local league consecutively (and earning entrance to the na­tionals) as well as winning the last ten varsity games on the bounce. With many university team members going on to represent the UK at the world championships, this type of domi­nance makes sense.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%9806%%[/mm-hide-text]

However, looking forward to this year’s match against Cambridge at the Hurlingham Club, London, van Loon is far from complacent. “We’ve lost some fantastic players this year, including previous president Harry Fisher, but we’ve been training hard and have some great talent,” including emerging star Martin Lester and a host of enthusiastic new members.

For OUCC, the future is very bright. For a sport which is barely played anywhere else in the country, the team has made a fantastic effort to include people from all colleges, years and backgrounds and are reaping the dividends, drawing upon a range of players and building a consistently competitive and strong team.

Eight places to play croquet in Oxford

0

It’s summer time, and the living is easy, espe­cially when most of the Oxford summer is spent on the croquet lawns. Though the sport itself is relaxed, the rivalry between colleges for the greatest, most manicured, most pristine cro­quet lawns is fierce. To resolve, once and for all, the most heated source of competition between colleges, I present to you the top eight places to play croquet in Oxford.

Straight in at number one are the Trinity Lawns, which, and there’s no two ways round this, are spectacular. If you are able to break in through the vaunted blue gates from Broad Street in order to bask on the lawns for an afternoon of croquet and Pimm’s, then count yourself lucky. If you haven’t, then make sure it’s at the top of your Oxford bucket list as it is truly the place to play.

A close second is Oriel Third Quad. Perhaps the most enclosed croquet quad in Oxford, its ur­ban atmosphere undoubtedly adds to the pace of the game. Midday crowds are normally in the double figures so there’s no room for error. A tree and manhole cover ensure only the best can win.

Next up is Queen’s Front Quad. Tucked away behind the huge queues at the Queen’s Lane bus stop, is – surprise, surprise – Queen’s, one of Ox­ford’s stealth High Street croquet havens. If you are lucky enough to be at Queen’s, or if you have friends that are, then you will certainly know that once you disappear into their Front Quad, the surroundings are stunning. On a sunny afternoon, when the sun hits the Quad’s huge arches, which are so sexy that they would give the Romans college envy, there is nothing better to do than knock some plastic balls through some metal hoops.

For a more bucolic take on croqueting, Mer­ton has you covered. Nestled between the green and pleasant lands of Merton Field and the not-so-satanic cobbles of Merton Street, one finds the battlefield that is Merton’s croquet lawn, sited on the appropriately named Mob Quad. Here, the perfectly manicured lawn masks the emotional scars and wounds suffered in the fierce revision-break matches over the centuries. Luckily for Mertonians, their library is a mere five metres from this modern day Colosseum, which makes tactical and theoretical croquet-based mid-match research most convenient. This training ground has seen the likes of James Flannery – Croquet Cuppers King himself – refine their talents on its grassy verges. Those pitted against any Merton team in the next stage of Cuppers… be prepared.

It should come as no surprise that St John’s makes the cut, given they have so much money they have no idea what do with it. Luckily for you, the croquet-mad public, word has it that they have invested a serious amount of £££ in creat­ing a state-of-the-art croquet facility within the walls of college. Also, I have it on good authority that they’ve installed under-soil heating to en­sure that Johnians have the Cuppers advantage of year-round croquet. Watch out world: they mean business.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%9538%%[/mm-hide-text]

From one kind of excess to another, in at six is Christ Church. We get it, Christ Church, your college is pretty cool, and your meadow isn’t half bad either. Their croquet lawn is, as you might expect, pretty fantastic too. So if you get drawn against a Christ Church four in the final rounds of Cuppers, you ought make the most of it by, at the very least, recreating the notorious Bulling­don Club photo – let’s be honest, you needed a new cover photo anyway.

For the more danger-inclined, our penultimate croquet lawn of choice is the Gladstone Link. I may have lied about the low-stakes croquet be­fore: nothing screams high stakes like avoiding an army of angry finalists and librarians as you set up a unique hybrid of crazy golf and croquet in order to harness the true purpose of the Glad­stone Link’s moving bookshelves. Mr Gladstone himself would certainly have approved.

And rounding off the list is Worcester. Because Emma Watson played croquet there. Probably.

Shake it off: Magdalen win Dancesport Cuppers

0

On Saturday morning, students from across the Oxford colleges, armed with sequins and sass, filled out the floor at Iffley Road gym to compete in this year’s Dance Cuppers, coordinated by the Oxford University Dancesport Club (OUDC).

The competition got off to an energetic start with couples taking to the floor in their eye-catching sparkling dresses and tight shirts. Couples from each college, comprising of at least one inexperienced dancer, competed in fast-moving heats. The competition began with an elegant waltz, but there was a quick change of pace and music as the Cha Cha Cha competitors delighted the numerous friends and family who came to show their support.

After heats in both the Quickstep and Jive, tensions grew as the high-profile judges made their decisions asto who would go through to the next round of heats. Competitors were given some time to cool off as demonstrations were given by both the Komrades, the OUDC’s Rueda dance team, and the OUDC’s rock and roll team, who performed some high energy and captivating routines.

As the couples were whittled down the competitors became more and more enthused to make it to the critical final. The kicks got higher. The turns got faster. The stakes had been raised. The pressure was on as the finalists were announced. The spotlight was on the remaining six couples who battled it out for the title of each of the four dance styles.

The competition was fierce as experienced, inexperienced, male-female partnerships and female-female partnerships each put their own twist on these classic dance styles. However, competitors and spectators had to wait a bit longer to find out who the winners were as the OUDC’s more experienced dancers gave the audience a treat in performing some varsity standard routines.

Finally, the winners were announced and the all-important presentations were made. Magdalen had a brilliant day, winning both best A team and best overall team with a total of 109.5 points. Keble – last year’s runners up – came second with 73 points and Jesus came a close third with 72 points. Andrew Everall and Seana Moon White represented the fantastic turnout of inexperienced dancers winning the best inexperienced couple. Individual congratulations must also go to Dan Bright and Ellie Shearer who won the open Rock and Roll, and to Konstantin Goncharov and Eliza Casapopol who won the open Salsa.

It is fair to say all who participated and watched the competition left with a smile on their face and a skip in their step.

Creaming Spires TT15 Week 4

0

There are, roughly speaking, two conversations you have on Grindr. The first kind is the one you have earlier on in the evening, or when you’re just starting off. You pick profiles with wholesome names like ‘student’, ‘Tim’ or ‘hey there’, and engage in polite chitchat about what he studies, what you’ve been doing today and what films you’re both into. The key thing, however, is that while you’re both there to fuck (it is, technically, possible to be on Grindr and actually be looking for honest-to-goodness coffee dates — I’ve even been on one – but we shall set these aberrances aside), in this conversation no-one must be the first to put sex on the table. 

So, with strategy that would put UN negotiators to shame, it is crucial to be the first one to ask, ‘What are you looking for?’ That way, he has to be the one to bring sex (Grindr lingo: ‘fun’) into the picture, and you can finally drop the worry that you were revealing your harlot ways to an innocent young man who just wanted a gym buddy. 

The other conversation one has on Grindr is the one you have once you get frustrated with that delicate dance. Maybe you take your face off your profile, maybe you shrug and throw caution to the wind. ‘Horny?’ you message every likely candidate (the pool getting older as your standards drop through the night) within five minutes’ biking radius. Exchange a few photos to confirm he has the anatomy you’re interested in and head on over. 

You meet. Horny optimism encounters sober reality, and with no roadmap we revert to the manners our mums taught us, offering drinks and (no, really) sometimes even shaking hands, with a few strained words about the weather outside. Finally you work up the mettle to lean over and make out with this stranger you met two minutes ago, and like a skydiver’s leap it falls into place from there, and – bonus – since you don’t have to care about each other, you can be as selfish as he’ll let you be. Half an hour later you’re back on the street, slightly stickier, lighter on your feet, and wondering if everyone recognises that smug just-got-rimmed expression on your face. 

The vinyl to Grindr’s MP3, gay saunas are an institution many people don’t know still exists. Think men wandering around darkened corridors in only towels (with cheaper or free entry to under-25s, this genuinely isn’t Night of the Living Dead), generally with some sort of steam room, jacuzzi and mattress-sized cubicles (‘cabins’) for privacy. No pretences of delicacy here; it’s all on show: eye contact or a gentle grope as you pass is the favoured statement of intent, and if you’re going at it in a public space you’ll probably look up to find yourself in an impromptu orgy (note: saunas ruin you for Never Have I Ever). Finished, shower off the encounter and find someone new. 

Romantic dry spells I know all about. But going without sex? Sorry: not my style.

When Ms, Miss and Mrs don’t work

0

Unless you are particularly qualified, a Doctor or a Professor for example, you will have to choose your title from a binary mix of Miss, Mrs, Ms or Mr. Not only is the gender specific nature of this selection restrictive for those who do not identify as male or female, but the choices for those who do identify as female are contingent upon their relation to a man. 

A man will almost always be ‘Mr’ – regardless of marital status. A man’s title stands alone, as does he himself. But as a female, I must be addressed according to my relationship, or lack of, with a man. I must be identified as either single and up for grabs, or as married, a man’s possession. Have we really not moved on from the time when women were so subordinated that they could only be referred to in relation to men? 

Even Ms has bad connotations – it seems evasive, a product of this social conditioning that a woman should be married, intimating that Ms is a way to cover up one’s spinsterhood. It is for Misses who are ‘too old’ to be a Miss; and here lies the ageism suffered by women regarding their relationship to men, not endured by men themselves. When a boy comes of age and crosses the threshold into adulthood, he gets to upgrade his title from Master to Mr immediately, on the principle that he is now a ‘man’. He is independent and acquires the superiority of the title ‘Mr’ on account of his age alone. On account of himself, alone. A single man in his forties is a bachelor, a word with all sorts of glamorous connotations – bachelorhood is a choice, a lifestyle, a freedom. Yet the female equivalent, spinsterhood, is reminiscent of decrepit old ladies hoarding cats or snakes or mothballs. 

It is a situation in life that women do not choose, apparently, rather like being picked last in PE lessons, or in this case not being picked at all. And again this antiquated approach to relations between men and women – the latter relegated to passivity – is reinforced by the titles we must pick from – available, taken, I’d rather not say. 

And for those who do not fit the gender binary, there is a wide array of titles – Ind, Misc, M, Mx, Pr – but how often do you see them in the drop-down box for your delivery address? 

There are so many of these gender-neutral titles, yet so few are widely recognised. People are not giving enough attention to the significant portion of our society that does not play by the antiquated and intolerant rules of the binary system currently still in place. Our failure to progress beyond these conventions makes me wonder whether we need titles at all. 

Hasn’t society moved on from the days when a title was a necessary formality? In many professions, being on first name terms is considered positive behavior and the terms Mr, Mrs, Ms etc genuinely provide little added information about a person. There is a strong case for saying that titles are indeed redundant. 

In an atmosphere of greater acceptance of identities that do not conform to the patriarchal norms of a male dominated society, isn’t it about time that we rid ourselves of the titles that restrict us to gender binary roles? Moreover, the continued use of Miss and Mrs consigns those who do identify as female to the patriarchal ideal of a woman as a man’s property; whereas men get upgraded to Mr simply on account of their age. In fact, we hardly hear the distinction between Master and Mr these days – if men can drop this ageist approach to prefixing their name, why can’t women do the same without even more offensively differentiated titles? Why must women be referred to only in relation to men? 

Our society has started to progress out of the patriarchal dark ages to see gender in a more enlightened, open minded and less binary way. There is much more awareness of female emancipation and transgender identification and the more we talk about and engage in this discussion the better.

Athletes fall at final hurdle

0

Despite Cambridge’s home advantage, spirits were high in the Oxford camp as their athletes travelled to Wilberforce Road for the 141st varsity match. Having regained the trophy last year after a barren spell, the men were hoping to repeat their success, whereas the women looked to overturn a three match losing run, though both knew the result hung finely in the balance.

The day started well for Cambridge, as was expected, as GB hammer thrower Michael Painter led in his favoured event, which proved to be the first of his three wins on the day in the throws. Oxford responded well, though, as captains Sam Trigg and Montana Jackson led from the front with victories in the long jump. Both would follow this result up with further wins, Trigg with a match-record leap of 15.37m and Montana with victories in both the 400m hurdles and the triple jump. In the latter of these, he produced a huge personal best to break 12 metres for the first time and record a place in the top 100 of UK all-time jumps.

President Adam McBraida then continued to provide an example to the team with a victory and Blues standard in the 400m hurdles, despite a brave challenge from Alastair Stanley of Cambridge, who finished only a fraction behind. It was at this point that the first major upset of the day occurred, the first of many marginal battles that Cambridge would unfortunately come out on top in, as Billy Pinder took a hard-fought victory from the front in the 800m, edging out Louis Rawlings in the home straight by 0.07 seconds.

After this, Cambridge started to build momentum, as they subsequently took victory in both the men’s and women’s 100m and 400m, with Alice Kaye and Barney Walker winning excellent 400m races. The victorious Walker was able to avenge his infamous fall five metres from the line in 2014.

The Light Blues then took the narrowest of victories in the men’s 100m, with only the width of a vest separating Isaac Kitchen-Smith from victory, as well as in the high jump and the pole vault. In the high jump, both events were lost on countback, as jumpers from Oxford and Cambridge both cleared the same height, and the same was true in the women’s pole vault, with captain-elect Sam Rawlinson sadly denied victory.

Also in the pole vault, while recovering from wrist surgery following a freak training accident, GB international Rowan May vaulted using only one hand to obtain his full blue, clearing a highly impressive 2.80m. Having been injured for varsity in both of his first two years, Rowan will be hoping to arrive next year fully fit, at his best a 5.25m vaulter.

Oxford then started to re-gather their momentum, but sadly it would be too late to salvage either the women’s or men’s match. In the 1500m, Will Christofi led a hard race from the front for a big PB and a full blue, only just being overhauled by one Cambridge runner who used his finishing speed having been dragged round. Adam McBraida returned to the track for the 200m hurdles, an event that he has made his own the last few years with four successive wins, to take a commanding victory and a second Blues time of the day. George Gundle followed this with a big PB in the 200m flat to avenge his 400m defeat and end a highly prolific Varsity career on a high.

Of particular note in the women’s match for Oxford was Grace Clements, a Commonwealth Games bronze medalist in the heptathlon, who provided strong performances in multiple events in the field, competing against the university where she was an undergraduate.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11795%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Also playing a vital role was Anna Niedbala, who produced a dominating performance in the discus for a comfortable victory. Such performances would sadly not be enough to overturn a terrific Cambridge performance across the board, but provided two varsity matches which many claimed to have been the highest calibre that they had ever seen. The effort that every single athlete put in to their event is typified by Dani Chattenton in the women’s 2000m steeplechase, who briefly fainted with exhaustion at the end of her race, having being pipped for the victory and within a second of the Blues time.

Strong performances would also sadly see Cambridge take both seconds matches in a very closely contested competition. This was despite particularly notable efforts from Ralph Eliot (200m and 400m winner) and Adam Speake (1500m winner), both competing in their last varsity match of prolific Oxford careers.

How to… Defeat fifth week blues

0

A gargantuan monster unfurls from its tightly-kept foetal position, and rises its drowsy head, bearing saliva-soaked fangs which reek of lethargy and drunken arguments. That’s right. 5th Week is approaching. 

I don’t know what it is about 5th Week. I don’t know why, or what, or who, or where, or how. But I do know that 5th Week is not for the merry. 

Now over the last few thousands of years, Oxonians have developed several coping techniques for 5th Week Blues. I don’t have time to go over all the tried and failed remedies, instead I come with one new tactic.

So. Right now it’s Friday, which means you’ll be limbering up for 5th Week, and all the tears, pain, exhaustion, and indulgent complaints it entails. At least you think you are.

But of course if you follow the magic words which you are about to read, inscribed upon this good-quality thin material derived from dried pulp with wood n grass n ting in it, then you will never step anywhere near aquamarine, navy, turquoise, teal, or azure. 

You’re going to need to buy some supplies. Your shopping list is as follows:

1. An A5 Diary, where two pages map a week‘s worth of time. 

2. One new black fine-tipped sharpie

3. A pack of five Tesco’s Finest Belgian Deluxe Triple Chocolate cookies

4. Monster Munch

5. An eraser/rubber

So you’ve done your shopping, and you are now sitting in your room. Unpack all your shopping and lay it beside you. Pick up the A5 diary, and turn to the double-page spread which depicts 5th Week. Pick up the rubber. Fiercely rub across the whole page, imagining that you are obliterating the week. This is what some people like to call a metaphor. Never underestimate a metaphor. 

(If at any point someone tries to interrupt you, pick up a pack of Monster Munch (placed handily beside you as I instructed), and throw it instantly at the particular acquaintance who is trying to socialise with you. This will naturally dispel them with ease, either due to the acutely queasy fumes that Monster Munch emits, or the strange fanatic reaction of those Monster Munch obsessors. Who will grab the pack, and scarper, to eat away their soul in peace.)

Once you feel you have sufficiently metaphorised the week, brush the rubber shavings into a neat pile and then rush to the nearest sink and wash wash away. There can’t be a shaving in sight. 

Now obviously the 5th Week is still there. Don’t worry. Use the sharpie and make quick and aggressive swipes across each day’s dated titling. Ha! Fuck you 5th Week. As we know Sundays mark the beginning of the week in Oxford (what is that even about), so at 11.55pm on Saturday, clutch the diary to your chest and chant the colours of the rainbow over and over again. DO NOT SAY BLUE. It’s probably best not to say Indigo either. You can never be too safe.

With good luck, and the right spiritual spheres, life should zoom straight on to 6thWeek. I hope all is more pleasant over there for you.

Oh, and the cookies are for me, as a thank you present. You know where to find me.

Diary of an… OUSU President

0

Them little blue lights on the ceiling are the first thing I see as I open my eyes to the dreary articulations of the driver saying “St Clement’s”. There is always a tonne of people on the Oxford Tube on a Sunday night. I hate every single one of those people. 

I schlep my stuff off the bus and wonder back to the Temple, a house of wonder and mystery where I live with the gang. Its about 11:59pm so I’ve missed the tri-wizard tournament – a weekly FIFA battle between Hector, Callum and myself. I shed a tear – I lament the hat-trick Wilfred Bony might have scored for the Ivory Coast.

Mondays, like most days, is a work day. Unsurprisingly then, I go to work. I’ll get to the office about 9ish and check through the important emails from the weekend. I can’t operate before I’ve had my first avocado. I have this one with balsamic vinegar. I spill vinegar on my trackies. I’ll get a suit on and go to meetings. Sometimes they are interesting, often they aren’t. Today I am representing students on a committee about alumni relations. In short, they want us to get rich and give them money. If, as part of an attempt to get rich, we die trying, they hope we will put something in our will. This is understandable because the University genuinely believes it is strapped for cash. It kind of is, but also just announced it raised £2 billion. I play hard to get and say I’ll mentor people and stay in touch.

I have an iPad. At intervals of between 30 and 105 seconds, it pings with an email. 9 times out of 10, it’s an email with no relevance to anybody. No I don’t want translation services, debt collection services or to help you pick up your euro millions jackpot. Sometimes it’s an alert to tell me OUSU is in the news. It’s a nervous wait for the ever-reliably unreliable eduroam to load the email. It’s normally fine – just the Daily Mail saying how bad it is we invited a certain speaker.

I’ll head back to the office and get some work done – writing papers for university committees, speaking to students who want help with stuff, arranging more meetings, another avocado. I’ll listen to some Biggie, Fleetwood Mac, or JME to get me through. Sometimes I’ll be running or attending Uni or OUSU events, other times, I won’t.

My evenings vary greatly. Sometimes, I’ll be meeting common room presidents or going to OUSU council, or seeing some actually normal students who may or may not be my friends. Sometimes I’ll go on an inevitably ill-fated date. (If you can help me find love, please email [email protected]).

However tonight, as happens a few times each week, I am DJing at one of Oxford’s fine night time establishments. 

I’m at Cellar painfully early, so much so that everywhere, there are still half-full tinnies of Red Stripe that were being nursed for about two hours before their nurses decided to go home in order to save themselves for the next Cellar night. In the light, it’s not that cool a place. I’ll find the person organising and they’ll be running around worried that their zine is going to crumble if tonight isn’t equalling Bully-level waveyness. They tell me I’m on at some god-forsaken time. I ask what I should play for this impressively edgy night? They say nineties. I wonder if Oxford will ever get over the decade that was the least notable for music except for the wonderful Garage and Acid House stuff that defines modern electronic music. But whenever I drop some Sweet Female Attitude, there is still only about four people who get as excited as they should. Three of those four work behind the bar at Cellar. The requests for Steps, S Club and Five are like daggers through my soul. It’s late and I’ve been worn down over my now 18 hour day. I dance along to ‘Reach’ reluctantly, and the zine makes enough money to get published.

Another early morning and more of the same. When there is an issue that is likely to hit the headlines about Oxford, I meet with a lovely man named Jeremy. He is in charge of the University’s Public Affairs Directorate and his team read the student newspapers religiously. Hello. We normally meet in the mornings. 

On weekends, I’ll often go back to Watford to watch the mighty (and now Premier League) Hornets. I’ll have to be reading emails and work things at half time, but it’s ok because I love my job. But I love Watford FC more.

I get the Oxford Tube back to Oxford.

The actual reality of boredom

0

No matter how many times you wrote about the incredible passion you have for your subject in your personal statement, you will have experienced mind-crushing boredom at one stage or another at Oxford. Whether your mind is drifting away in a lecture, in a tutorial, or when writing a Cherwell article, boredom is a pervasive aspect of everyday life. So pervasive in fact, that we rarely question why we even feel it. 

Even if you don’t know why you get bored, you’ll certainly know when you get bored. An overwhelming lack of interest in your surroundings and difficulty in concentrating on tasks leads to the sensation of your mind ‘slipping away’, unable to focus on anything in particular. Boredom is typically viewed as an emotion you feel when you have nothing to do. Psychologist John Eastwood, after interviewing hundreds of people on how they experience boredom, defined boredom as having the desire to be stimulated, but being unable to pay attention to the task at hand or to your environment. 

This has obvious repercussions in education, as anyone in the midst of an essay crisis can confirm. Being bored prevents effective learning, given that not only do you do less work overall, but the little work that is completed will have been done when highly distracted. Hence prolonged boredom is often inversely related to learning. If a task is predictable or a student easily understands the material, this can be as damaging to effective learning as a difficult task. In both situations the student will be unable to be stimulated because the task is either repetitive or routine, or they cannot apply themselves to it. 

A study conducted in 1989 by Damrad- Frye and Laird reflects this, where volunteers conducted a task while noise played in the background. The louder the noises were, the more distracting they were because the volunteers could not pay as much attention to the task. The louder the noise, the more bored the volunteers reported feeling, and interestingly the task associated with the loud noise was less pleasant. It seems that even if inattention results from an external source unrelated to the task, the task is still perceived to be less interesting. 

This underpins the function of boredom. Emotions have developed for the same reason that other mental processes such as memory have – they help us survive and reproduce. Fear helps us avoid danger, while disgust helps us avoid infection and disease. 

In the same way, boredom encourages us to seek stimulation. Whether that stimulation comes internally and so drives more creative ways of thinking, or comes externally, motivating exploration of your environment, boredom is very beneficial. This desire for stimulation is so strong that a team of researchers led by Timothy Wilson reported that participants left in a room for up to 15 minutes, with nothing to do except think, said they actually preferred to give themselves a painful electric shock rather than do nothing. 

But as with every emotion, excess is damaging. Proneness to boredom is just as damaging as inappropriate anger, being linked to tendencies to engage in harmful activities such as smoking, alcohol, drugs, and even comfort-eating. Indeed, a study conducted in South Africa found that the biggest factor influencing drug use was boredom, while a study investigating the health of over 18,000 British civil servants found that those who were most likely to get bored were around 30 per cent more likely to have died over the period of the study. 

A tendency to be bored also makes your everyday life just that bit more difficult, with silly mistakes like pouring orange juice into your tea instead of milk more frequently made by bored people. 

Boredom may not be the most glamorous of emotions, but without it mankind would not be as driven to create and explore. This causes problems in the modern world, where education and the workplace demand a fair amount of repetitive activity. Whether this consists of simple rote learning of course material or completing paperwork every working day, it is not in any sense stimulating. 

Although I would recommend against claiming to your tutor that your innate desire for stimulation prevented you from learning your notes for the tutorial, recognising the cause of boredom means you can take steps to avoid it, or evenutilise it.