Sunday 8th June 2025
Blog Page 1299

The contrary states of the human condition

0

Life is rarely black and white, yet humans seem to have an irrepressible urge to see it as such. Dualistic ideas seem to infiltrate all the major religions; the idea of an absolute ‘good’ and ‘bad’, in conflict with each other. From John’s Gospel to Harry Potter, ‘bad’ is dark, ‘good’ is light, and all the rest that comes with it. In fact, we have become so used to these ideas that we’re now either oblivious to them, or actively bored by them — books or films with obvious villains are facile and deficient in character development.

Then we have the other type of dualism, of the yin-yang variety, where rather than the vic- tory of one over the other, the two are seen as complementary and even necessary to survival — the duality of day and night, for example. The whole traditional Chinese way of thought was based upon the idea that two complementary opposites add up to make something greater than the sum of the individual parts. But isn’t this also now rather overdone; an idea which has become tedious simply through its ubiq- uity in society?

There is, though, a dualistic philosophy to be found which does not simply evoke childish ‘goodies and baddies’, or tasteless caricatures of oriental wisdom. William Blake saw the world in dual terms, which were at once in conflict and yet also necessary for each other. Songs of Innocence and Experience: Shewing the Two Contrary States of the Human Soul, rather makes this point by itself. The two books of poems (one written a few years after the other), go together hand in glove – almost every poem from the Songs of Innocence has a parallel in Songs of Experience, usually expressing the opposite view of humanity. And yet neither is definitive, both are merely different ways of perceiving the same thing.

If you want to see Blake expounding this explicitly, though, the answer lies in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. Hint in the title? Like the Songs, Blake puts together two contraries, both of which, he says, are essential to human existence. His famous critique of Christianity rested on the idea that this faith only saw one side of life, that is, Heaven, and refused to accept that there was any place for Hell.

The opening pages of the book proclaim,“Without Contraries is no progression. Attraction and Repulsion, Reason and Energy, Love and Hate, are necessary to human existence.” From these, Blake says, spring good and evil, equated with Heaven and Hell. Good stems from reason, evil from what Blake calls “en- ergy”. This might sound slightly as if Blake saw the dual powers as completely complementary, indeed I think he probably did, but they are also very definitely in conflict a conflict which is necessary for both.

The Marriage of Heaven and Hell is visionary and beautiful. It consists of poems, proverbs, and what Blake entitles “Memorable Fancies”, visions of angels and demons, exploring the relationship between the two. In one such “Memorable Fancy” an angel visits Blake and warns him of his imminent destruction in the fires of hell and decides to show him what awaits him if he doesn’t change his ways. What follows is a gruesome, horrifying depiction of hell, a metamorphosing pit of anguish and terror (I definitely recommend you read it).

The angel, in fear, leaves, and suddenly the scene changes — we are on a grassy moonlit river bank, a harpist singing to his harp; a complete pastoral idyll. Blake then returns to the angel, and tells him “all that we saw was owing to your metaphysics”. He takes the angel to view his eternal lot in heaven, which in Blake’s presence turns out to be just as awful as hell. The two cordially agree to stop imposing upon each other, and that further discussion is pointless. He returns to the idea again when describing another “Fancy”, walking, delighted, in the fires of Hell, “which to Angels look like torment and insanity”. There is no sense of the two forces, good and evil, or reason and energy, in harmony with each other.

Blake was, of course, dismissed by many as a madman, and you can really see why — I’ve only recounted perhaps the most sane of his writ- ings. He developed a vast, wide ranging world of thought, filled with strange prophecies and beasts; gods and devils. His ideas become ‘gnos- tic’, seeing the Christian creator god as an evil, or ignorant entity. But at the heart, his criticism comes down to an imbalance; the Christian god is only good; Heaven; reason. It ignores the other side of hum“an nature, summed up by Blake as “Hell” in conflict with Heaven, but it is also a necessary side of humanity that should not be suppressed.

I think all his writings can be read as a critique of religion. “Energy”, “evil” is human passion — although Blake was actually very hap- pily married, he definitely approved of free love and following sensual enjoyment, to a degree. He saw the Church as suppressing this side of things and “listening only to angels”, only to the “reason” and never to the “energy” from which, he says, springs eternal delight.

Maybe it is simply the complicated nature of his message, but I am inclined to think that Blake’s dualism holds a fascination that the worn out clichés of simplistic dualistic ideas have simply ceased to do. The two halves are in genuine conflict, but they are both also genuine parts of human nature and thus, neither should be triumphed over completely 

Runners criss-cross Kent countryside in training camp

0

This year’s Oxford University Cross Country Club Summer Training Camp took place at Carroty Wood adventure centre in Tonbridge, with the beautiful Kent countryside of the surrounding area as a backdrop. With varsity on the horizon, this was the ideal opportunity for the club to prepare for the new season and to integrate the new group of freshers. As well as having bumper attendance, the team were joined by new coach Eric Shirley who spent the five days running sessions, providing navigational support during steady runs, piloting the minibus and generally offering great support — a fantastic start to what will be a very fruitful relationship with the club.

In addition to laying down some good qual- ity early season miles, the team had two inter- val sessions of 8 x 2mins on the Thursday and a ten minute tempo run followed by 12 x 30 secs on Saturday, which settled into a perfect mix of teamwork and competition, a solid foundation for some great training during Michaelmas.

As well as Shirley, the team were lucky enough to have soft tissue therapist Lesley Bryant, whose massages and advice on conditioning and injury prevention will prove invalu- able in the run up to varsity and beyond. The grimaces of some of those newer to massage provided great entertainment in the living area but the ribbing was well received — being more than worth it for the lovely loose feeling the next day.

The camp included a tour of the varsity course from which the team were able to assess where they would be running later in the term. This was followed by Commonwealth 5000m bronze medallist and twice silver medallist in the world cross country Tim Hutchings giving the team a talk. A hugely entertaining and in- spiring character, highlights included stories of self-massage using motor oil and an antipa- thy for rest days.

The final day consisted of a lovely long run from which the team returned to hear of the new marathon world best, before a final ‘sur- prise’ (for some of the more oblivious attend- ees) was revealed: a trip to meet Kelly Holmes at her new local venture, ‘café 1809’. It was an inspiring way to end the week, with an Olym- pic champion, some tasty cakes and the pos- sibility of working with Kelly’s charity in the future.

Ultimately a great success, the camp has left the club with hopes of a bright season ahead. 

Oxford cyclists impress in Bristol

0

On Saturday 11th October the Oxford Uni- versity Cycling Club began its 2014/2015 season at the Bristol University Hill climb held on Belmont hill just outside the city.

The twisting 1.2 kilometre time trial had an average gradient of 8%, and a final kick of 17.5%, which proved to be a challenging course for the squad. The 5am start seemed to take its toll on the men’s team, who all finished mid- table. Daniel Alanine, James Lambton and Alasdair Morrison all came in within 0.7s of each other around the 3:42 mark. The fastest university cyclist of all was Mark Bleakley of Bath who finished in 3:14.3.

On the woman’s side, Tamara Davenne finished in 3rd place with a time of 4:35.5, 8 sec- onds behind Kate Baker, again of Bath University.

The event was part of a busy Michaelmas cal- endar for the team, who are to take part in the Oxford Hill Climb on Saturday 18th.

This event is open for anybody to take part, and will include the Oxford team, who will be hoping to build on their opening performance over the new cycling season. The event will take place at Watlington Hill, around 14 miles from Oxford. The hill is just under a mile long, with an average gradient of 7% and a steepest gradient of 17.5%. Riders set off at 1 minute in- tervals, and whoever clocks the quickest time will be crowned champion.

Last year’s winner was Henri William in a time of 4 mins 11 seconds, just shy of the club record (4mins 0 seconds) set by David McGaw in 2007. The woman’s title was won by Tamara Davenne.

Road Captain Alasdair Morrison said about this year’s race, “The excitement is likely to be between Tom Bolton (racing well), Henri Williams (just returned from a month of touring in the alps), James Lambton (smashing rubber down on the flat over the summer) and Daniel Alanine (‘cause he is almost French). Could any newcomers throw a spanner in the plans of many?”

Competitors meet just before 10:00 am on the Saturday on Broad Street outside Trinity college and you can cycle down with the squad. The event is free for OUCC members or £2 for non-members.

Morgan Freeman to speak at the Oxford Union

0

Morgan Freeman will be speaking at the Oxford Union on November 11th.

His visit was announced at last night’s Thursday debate, the subject of which was ‘This House has no confidence in Her Majesty’s Government’.

Freeman is speaking as part of the Union’s new partnership with the Screen Actors’ Guild (SAG) Foundation.

Union President Mayank Banerjee said, “We are delighted to announce the first of what we hope will be a long and successful partnership with the SAG Foundation. It is an absolute honour to host Morgan Freeman at the Union and we genuinely think there has never been a better term to be become a member.

“We hope to announce more speakers over the coming few days and encourage you to keep checking our social media for updates.”

The star of recent children’s film The Lego Movie joins fellow acting royalty Ian McKellan (November 3rd) on a termcard which includes a number of important figures from the world of film and TV, including producers from break-out hit Game of Thrones.

How does Oxford compare nationally in SU spending?

0

Spending per head at Oxford is unpredictable. The graph on the previous page shows how JCR spending varies dramatically between colleges and PPHs. On top of this, however, students also receive a sum of around £36 per year per head on average from OUSU. C+ wondered how this compared nationally.

Cambridge students, given their familiar JCR support system, find themselves in a similar situation. With Student Union spending of around £561,000 in 2011-2012 according to official CUSU accounts, those at ‘the other place’ can expect around £31 annually per person from their union. Again, variable JCR spending means the amount each student has spent on them in total will vary.

At fellow collegiate university Durham, individual students get a much larger £108 every year, with Durham Students’ Union (DSU) spending £1,771,495 in total in the academic year 2012-2013 according to officially published accounts. It is worth noting, however, that DSU has a much more active presence in Durham than OUSU and CUSU do at their respective universities, with JCRs carrying much less of the financial burden.

When it comes to non-collegiate universities, students also seem, on the whole, to be benefitting from more student union spending than Oxbridge. Freedom of Information requests reveal that the University of Sunderland Student Union spent around £20,000 less than the £1,500,000 raised in 2013. As a result, around £87 per head is spent on students every year, more than at many Oxford colleges — OUSU contributions included.
Lancaster University Student Union’s (LUSU) figures show officers had £8,390,000 to spend on students in the academic year between 2013 and 2014, meaning that £670 is spent per head. It should be noted, however, that LUSU plays a significant role in providing accommodation for students, explaining the much higher spending — and income. London universities also spend more than Oxford. The body representing King’s College London students, for example, spends almost £139 per person, according to publicly available statistics 2013/2014.

Whilst the combined annual spending on an Oxford student is likely to be lower than the spending of student unions at other universities, Oxford students gain financially in other ways. More generous bursaries, accommodation that is cheaper and often guaranteed for the duration of their course, and reasonable food are all advantages which make up for lower JCR and OUSU spending.

Investigation: JCR Spending

0

This investigation also includes Tom Carter describing the role of a JCR treasurer, Alex Stronell examing how different JCRs give to charity and Charlie Atkins comparing student union spending at Oxford to other universities. 

When deciding to launch an investigation into how different JCRs spend their money, C+ knew that there was quite likely to be a fair amount of variation between different JCRs, due to the nature of the collegiate system. In terms of the method in which the investigation was conducted, we emailed every undergraduate JCR President, over this term and the last, asking if they would be willing to answer ten questions concerning their budget. This included how much they spend, how they spend it, how the budget is funded, how they use levies, and how much their JCR gives to charity.
What we found was that in broad terms JCRs across Oxford offer fairly similar services to their members, but spend substantially different amounts of money. Therefore, despite forums such as the JCR Presidents’ Committee (‘PresCom’) in which best practise can be shared, it turns out that the college you are at really does matter after all.

For the most part, we found JCRs perform similar functions and responsibilities. All of the JCRs that were willing to speak to us seemed to share a core set of services. Typically, JCRs seem to spend around half of their money on welfare and entertainment. We also found that many — although not all — of the JCRs we spoke to offer a number of amenities in their common room, including newspapers, coffee, a pool table, or Sky television.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10305%%[/mm-hide-text]

However, C+ found a level of variation both in how much different JCRs spend per student, and how much they save per student. Most JCRs told us that they were predominantly reliant on college grants for funding, with JCR levies acting as an additional form of income. For instance, St Peter’s JCR has a £5 levy for membership. Of the colleges who spoke to us, the only partial exception was Balliol JCR, with most of their headline figure for how the JCR is funded being constituted from the profits of the bar and café. It was quite common for JCRs to operate a levy for punting, with Balliol, Trinity, St Peter’s and Worcester (amongst others) all telling us they did this. Other levies we encountered included charity levies, which Corpus Christi JCR uses to raise £9,000 for charity annually.

We also found that Balliol JCR had far greater savings than any other JCR. An explanation for this may lie in the fact that Balliol JCR directly runs its own bar and café. This means Balliol JCR has a much higher turnover than most of the colleges to whom we talked — in the region of £250,000, and consequently a reserve of £100,000 — also much larger than the others. By comparison, Corpus Christi JCR reported the fewest savings, with only £6,000. In addition to savings, Balliol and Magdalen JCRs mentioned having additional assets, mainly in art, valued at several hundred thousand pounds, which no other JCR reported.

Despite all this seemingly copious spending, in terms of the financial health of Oxford’s JCRs, all those to whom we spoke seem to be operating a small budget surplus, or were aiming for a balanced budget. For example, Balliol JCR, we were told, have had a small budget surplus for around 10 years. However, this is not to say that JCR budgets are all roughly the same size. JCRs are divisible into three rough categories: low spenders, medium spenders, and high spenders.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10304%%[/mm-hide-text]

Low spenders include Teddy Hall and Trinity JCRs. These both share the characteristic of authorising over half of their expenditure through JCR motions, meaning that members of these colleges exercise stronger direct control over how their JCRs spend their money, potentially explaining why their overall spending appears lower.

In contrast, medium spenders, such as the JCRs of Balliol, Corpus Christi, LMH and St Peter’s appeared to spend more overall on core services, particularly welfare.

Meanwhile, what distinguished high spenders, such as Magdalen JCR, was the size of discretionary spending, with £8,700 spent on general meetings at the College in the academic year 2013/14 — although the budget allocation for 2014/15 for this item was greatly reduced, at £3,500. In addition, like the medium spenders, the high spenders also spent a greater amount overall on core services.

All that being said, it is worth noting that the real determinant of JCR spending is not, in fact, the preference of their members, but how much colleges provide in grants to students, particularly if JCRs do not run their own bars or cafés, and so have only minimal independent income.

What it’s like being a JCR Treasurer

0

Before writing this piece, I processed some JCR payments for Freshers’ Week. For that seems to be most of what a treasurer does: logging into Barclays online, setting up a payment, processing the payment through a damned card reader, reprocessing the payment when you fuck it up, logging the payment in an Excel spread sheet and, well, doing the process again. It is not, to be honest, very exciting. Sometimes, if you are very lucky, you get to set a budget for something and that’s a real petty power rush to the head.

Despite only starting the job this term, I have already worked out the pressure points: doing the accounts up and organising levies. Being a historian, accounts aren’t really my thing — and as always, the devil is in the detail. If the numbers don’t add up, there are only two potential reasons: a) I have been secreting away money to fund my debauched lifestyle, or b) there is some minuscule error in the middle of the spreadsheet which will take hours of pointless cross-checking to find. Fun, eh?

The Treasurer occupies a very weird position on any JCR committee. Ostensibly they are one of the most involved members of it, yet they seem to have very little to do with anyone else on the committee except to pay their bills. Indeed, contact with ordinary members of the JCR is even more limited unless it suddenly occurs to one of them that what the JCR really needs is a pinball machine. At JCR meetings, it seems like my only function is to nod, like one of Trotter’s fellow pigs in Animal Farm, at everything the President says. Loyal lieutenant some might say, window-dressing others.

Yet, despite all this inanity, the one important thing the Treasurer does have is financial responsibility for the assets of the JCR. For, if it all goes bust on your watch, then the consequences go beyond you feeling a little guilty. Bops would stop, charities would go unfunded, and NUS demos unsponsored.

However, in many cases, such as mine, the problem is quite the reverse, and the JCR spends too little money, accumulating hoards of electronic gold. But built up capital, necessary to some extent in case of emergency, is useless in helping hard-working students in need.

So the question arises of what to do with the excess capital. The previous Treasurer and I have both had the pleasing task of attempting to ‘spend down’ the JCR’s savings (we had savings of £20,000 at one stage, and that was on top of money coming from college). We got rid of the punt levy and started paying for punting with JCR savings, which meant that all members of the JCR, no matter how broke, could engage in this quintessential Oxford experience.

But despite the promise of physical wealth implied by the title, being treasurer is a pretty dull job. The treasure in question is but an Excel spreadsheet and an online bank account, hardly the stuff dreams are made of. The key thing about the job is to make sure that there is enough money left for emergencies, but not so much that students are missing out because of it. But other than that, it is relatively small fry: nothing to write home about, or even to Cherwell…

How do JCRs allocate charitable spending?

0

The varying approaches of colleges towards charitable donations are reflected strongly in their budgeting. Almost half of the JCRs that spoke to C+ told us that they operated a voluntary charity levy, normally of between £5 and £10, with students deciding where to donate the money at JCR meetings.

“The charity levy at Trinity is generated once a year to, unsurprisingly, raise money for charity. Each member of the JCR is charged £10, except for those who have opted out, a number which tends to be very low,” explained Tom Carter, treasurer of Trinity College.

He added, “All the money goes into a charities account and at the last JCR meeting of each term, people can put forward motions on which charities to support and on how much each of them should be given. The JCR then votes using an AV system on which charities to support. Simple.”

However, a small majority of JCRs told C+ that although they did not allocate a specific proportion of their budget to charity, or place a charity levy on members of the JCR, they had a Charity Rep to oversee fundraising and donations.

LMH JCR President Aadit Shankar told C+, “Because LMH is a registered charity we cannot simply allocate some of our annual budget to other charities. Instead, we try to create a culture of charity and generous giving within the undergraduate body with events and campaigns throughout the year. LMH participates in the university-wide RAG events, and has a charity committee comprised of staff, students and academics which meets regularly during term time to organise events.”

Likewise, some colleges, whilst not allocating money directly to charity, provide cash for fundraising events to be held. Oriel JCR President Kit Owens explained, “The JCR’s Charities Rep organises a number of charity events each term, including bake sales, charity formals, charity auctions and casino nights. Money from the JCR budget is used to facilitate those events.”

Oriel JCR Charities Rep Zara Milne remarked, “Last year our most successful fundraisers were probably the Charity Las Vegas Night — which involved a RAG casino and a charity auction — and the college Live Below the Line campaign, which raised over £2,000 for Afrikids.”

Some JCRs, however, stressed that their charitable donations came both from their students’ fundraising efforts and through voluntary levies. Worcester JCR told C+ that the Charity Rep was allocated £100 towards fundraising per term, and over the course of the year, students had raised £6,400 independently of the £7 charity levy billed to students in two of the three terms of the year. 

Conversely, University College JCR told C+ that they allocate approximately £300 per term to charities through standing orders. These funds are neither raised through specific levies or through the fundraising efforts of the students, but come from the budget itself. Univ JCR say that this typically amounts to between £700 and £900 going to charity over the year.

Cocktails with Cai: Sex on the Beach

0

New term, New Year, Michaelmas is a hectic time for everyone. Freshers are still finding their bearings, second years are filling out cover letter after cover letter, and finalists are trying out one last bid for freedom before hunkering down surrounded with piles of exam papers and examiners’ reports.

So, this week, I opted for familiarity over experimentation, I bring you the time-worn boozy holiday classic — Sex on the Beach — which is great for a nice pick me up after a week of stress and forgotten deadlines.

The Sex on the Beach is to cocktails what Lana Del Rey is to music; a modern classic, smooth and appealing, yet completely manufactured by the industry. And much like the infamous Ms. Del Rey, this cocktail is kitsch, fond of the colour pink, and easily enjoyed by a wide variety of people.

The cocktail was borne from an advertising push for peach schnapps, and yet a skim down the cocktail menu of any self-respecting bar will yield this well-known drink.

But there are, as always, ways of mixing it up a little (pun intended), one of which is turning your Sex on the Beach into a Sex on Fire.Instead of vodka — the teenage park-bench classic — you can replace this most hangover-inducing spirit with some Fireball Cinnamon Whisky for a spicy twist to make the first week blues a little more interesting for all you jaded finalists.

That is, if Sex on the Beach isn’t quite enough of a bucket list challenge for you already (FYI:I’m not talking about the cocktail).For the recipe as listed below I’ve used the Official Bartender version, but with thousands of variations splashed across the internet, experimentation is the name of the game.

2 measures vodka (or Fireball Cinnamon

Whisky)

1 measure peach schnapps

2 measures orange juice

2 measures cranberry juice

“A stunning place”

0

After a slew of more ‘brinners’ (breakfasts for dinner) than anybody should ever eat, my second foray into the world of food — at The Cherwell Boat House — felt more than overdue.

Up there with the smartest high-end restaurants our modest city has on offer, this establishment challenges your illusions about food by pricking at your taste buds like an acupuncturist in ways that are both delightful and completely unexpected.

The restaurant is situated, as one might guess, by the gurgling river Cherwell. Enroute, one passes through trees bathed in the orange glow of streetlamps. Once past these, a sleek and modern restaurant emerges. In the restaurant, we are seated by the window through which one can see punts, skeletons of a quickly diminishing summer, rocking in the calm evening current. To mirror this, the menu is dubbed ‘Late Summer’. It has changed now, but the pricing is the same: One course costs £16.25, two courses cost £21.50 and three courses cost £26.75 with certain speciality items in each course costing extra. My companion Zoe and I have three courses each.

For the first course, Zoe has the artichoke crème caramel (£1.50 extra charge) and I have the tuna tartare (£4.25 extra charge). Both dishes arrive as perfect cylinders with the sort of presentation that emphasizes the fact that I am slightly out of my depth here. Her dish is great and mine is incredible. It is undeniably European, but the wasabi kick and the thickness of the tuna has an obvious Japanese influence.

Next come the mains. I have the steak with foie gras (£10 extra) and Zoe has the fillet of John Dory. The steak is not the best I have ever had but it is cooked nicely and the sides are wonderful; the foie gras sits on top of the steak and the peas decorate the plate below. There is an overwhelmingly smoky taste throughout, yet the chef avoids any hint of burning. Zoe’s fish is cooked perfectly and is bathed in a sauce with hints of orange zest.

Lastly, we come to the desserts, and I coose ‘Textures of Strawberry’ (£4.50 extra charge); strawberries presented in five different ways. My favourite of these is the macerated strawberry, which has strong ginger notes. I’d never considered putting ginger and strawberry together: two great flavours, but both fairly dominating. However, my taste buds are pleasantly surprised by how they blend and compliment each other for a tangy sweetness that clings on to the last few evenings of summer. Zoe has the chocolate marquise with cherry compote. The chocolate is coated with pistachios. The tartness of the cherries hits you hard on the tongue at first before melting into the bitter chocolate.

I talk to the manager, Briss, at the end of the meal. He tells me about the restaurant’s history, which spans half a century. The focus is traditional English, but with a strong French influence. This makes sense given that the Boat House prides itself on its wine selection, which has won several awards over the last few years.

The new chef believes in simple food with simple ingredients — I take this statement in my stride, pretending that the complexity of what I ate tonight didn’t blow my immature mind.

The final word is this; it is a stunning place. Yes, it is expensive but it leaves you feeling like you’ve truly learnt something about food.

Go here with your parents. Go here when you make your illustrious return to Oxford. It will probably outlast us all.