Tuesday 7th April 2026
Blog Page 1377

Oxford medics question proposed bus link

0

A new bus service will halve the time taken to travel between Oxford University’s science corridor on South Parks and the John Radcliffe hospital, transporting “thousands” of students and staff.

The 600 will run from Pear Tree Park and Ride through to the John Radcliffe Hospital via Woodstock Road, Banbury Road, St. Clement’s and Headley Way. The service will cut a 30 minute journey, including a walk to the High Street, to just 14 minutes. The service will be available from September 29th and will run from Monday to Friday between 9.50am and 3.20pm.

The University has greeted the new service with enthusiasm, with William James, Pro-Vice Chancellor and Professor of Virology, stating, “the new 600 service is an excellent initiative that I hope will enable not only further collaboration between our medical sciences departments and a closer partnership with the NHS, but also help reduce traffic and parking in Oxford.”

Ed Wigzell, travel officer for Oxford University, said, “the main aim is to provide a link between the science area and the Headington hospitals. There’s more than 4,000 staff and many more students working and studying here in the science corridor and many of these need to travel to and from the hospitals.”

If it proves popular, the Oxford Bus Company may increase service to run during peak times and at weekends.

While the service will clearly benefit residents of North Oxford by providing them with direct links to the hospitals, Medical Sciences students remained less convinced. Ealish Swift, a 3rd year medic at Jesus, thought that it might help “the hit-and-miss nature of trying to catch a bus to the JR from the High Street from lectures” but added, “I probably won’t benefit this year. However, those who are doing research projects based at the hospital might appreciate this.”

Gareth Davies, a Wadham 4th year, was more skeptical, telling Cherwell,I cant see myself ever using it. The fact it’s only 9:50-15:20 means that most medics won’t find its service hours useful.”

Sam Skillcorn, a second year medic, echoed this cynicism, saying, “the only time I’d ever get this bus is if I fall over on my way to a lecture and need to go to A&E.”

 

Should the rest of the UK care about Scottish independence?

0

I did not intend for this article to happen. Instead, I imagined myself commissioning a friend of mine, notorious for his ideological flexibility, to write an I-don’t-give-a-shit article about Scottish Independence. After all, Scotland only comprises 8% of the UK’s population and independence, whilst it would inevitably cause seismic change up north, would not change much down south. Indeed, a recent survey showed that only 55% of English people cared about the referendum and that the majority thought that secession would leave the rest of the UK’s place on the world stage either unaltered or even magnified. Heck, after all the English hate that the most militant yes campaigners express, and their shocking overconfidence in an independent Scotland, it is unsurprising that the reaction of many of my friends to Scottish independence is one of mirth; intrigued by the idea of a constitutional shake up but at the same time ready to laugh when Scotland goes to the dogs. When one considers that independence would get rid of the great inequality in UK public spending whereby Scotland receive £1,623 per head more than the rest of the UK, a case could be made that, if anything, independence would be great for the average Oxford student.

Yet, as with much of what has been said in the campaign, this view is painfully narrow-minded. Both campaigns seem to suffer from an acute case of short-termism. The Yes campaign’s biggest asset undoubtedly is hatred and distrust of Westminster as epitomised most poignantly by the twin evils of Thatcher and Cameron. Their economic case is predicated on oil revenue that can only be predicted with any certainty in the short-term future. So the reference points for this campaign only really extend 30 years either way. For sure, the present is important and it is very easy to see the case for independence in the light of the damage Thatcher wreaked upon Scotland. Never again would be seemingly a good enough motive for any Aye voter.

Even the No campaign have been focusing quite rightly on the technicalities of what a split would actually entail for Scotland in the next 10 to 20 years. Yet, there is so much more to it than that.  The Union has not existed for only 30, or 60, or 150 years, but for more than 300. Its importance transcends generational problems, the problems that both campaigns seem to be focusing on. Nothing annoys me more than when Alex Salmond pops his head up and says that this is a ‘Once in a generation’ choice. It is not and to say so mitigates its importance. Constitutionally at least, its not even a ‘once in a lifetime’ choice but a ‘once in half-a-millennium’ one. So, the very notion that the outcome of the referendum could turn on a hatred of David Cameron is a rather grating one.

I am not saying, however, that the two campaigns are wrong to take such a short-termist approach. Nothing motivates the voter more than the immediate future. I am rather saying that despite the temptation to view the referendum as a far off distraction, when looked at through a longer-term lens it becomes very important indeed. There has always been a curious tension between our national identities (English, Scottish et cetera) and the supranational Britishness, one that this campaign has brought to the fore. Yet, after 300 years of Union, the interconnectedness of the Scottish, English and Welsh is undeniable. I am but one of many whose roots are as Scottish as English, having been born in Edinburgh and in possession of Scottish ancestry.

Indeed, whilst Scotland itself has five million residents, 800,000 further Scots live in the rest of the UK, disenfranchised in the upcoming referendum. Politically, the last Labour government counted a Scottish Prime Minister, Chancellor and Defence Secretary within its ranks. It is undeniable, to use clichéd terminology, that Scotland is an inextricable part of the family. We may formally be separate peoples but practically we are anything but. Thus, that is my first reason why the English should care: Scotland going independent would be more akin to our family being broken up than the ejection of a tenant.

A second, and closely related, reason is the extent to which we can achieve more together than apart. Being in the United Kingdom has undoubtedly given Scotland an advantage, not least free trade with the rest of Britain – its main trading partner – one of the primary reasons behind the establishment of the Union in the first place. The UK has given Scotland a platform to do things that it could never have accomplished otherwise, from a pioneering role the Industrial Revolution to extending its influence to all corners of the globe.  Yet Scotland has also itself been integral to the great success that we, the United Kingdom, have achieved in the past few centuries. Scots stood shoulder to shoulder with Englishmen in both world wars. The State that we have forged today, as much Scottish as English, is the envy of the world, with a national health service, free for all.  Alexander Fleming, a Scot, discovered penicillin in an English laboratory. To use an example closer to home, without the 14 Scottish medallists at London 2012, Team GB would have plummeted down the rankings. Thus, a Yes vote on Thursday would put an end to one of the most successful partnerships of all time.

Admittedly, this all seems slightly romanticised and emotional. After all, isn’t it the future that counts? Well, an independent Scotland would be damaging for that too. Not just for Scotland itself but for England as well. It is predicted that GDP growth for the rest of the UK would dramatically slow as a result of independence whilst the UK would lose 32% of its land mass. A lot of time and money would have to be expended on the transition, thereby forcing the English to neglect other pressing issues such as the rise of Islamic State. Trident alone would cost up to £3.5 billion to relocate. But it is far more than money or time which England would lose due to a Yes vote. It would also lose considerable prestige and power on the world stage. Its prominent place in Europe would be diminished whilst its permanent seat on the UN Security Council would be threatened. It is of no surprise therefore, that foreign leaders across the globe, from China to Australia to the USA, are worried enough about the damaging consequences of a Yes vote to interfere and state publicly their support for the Union.

Thus, in the present, past and future, this referendum will have a dramatic impact on the rest of the UK as well as Scotland: a family member lost, a promising future dampened. For centuries, we have forged our identity with the notion of a United Kingdom at its core. If, therefore, we are no longer united, our very identity is threatened. It is for this reason, above all others, that every part of the UK should care about this referendum. 

Oxford film wins big at Portobello festival

0

A film directed by and starring Oxford students has beaten 600 entrants to claim a prize at the Portobello film festival, signifying the recent meteoric rise of Oxford’s film scene over the past year.

The Wishing Horse, directed by Oxford Broadcasting Association president and New College student Alex Darby, received ‘Best London Film’ at the festival, which was dubbed by the Independent as “the largest celebration of independent film in Europe”.

Starring Imogen West-Knights, who graduated from Exeter College in 2013, the ten minute film explores the grief of a young girl, Lily. She is unable to cope with her father’s failing health and a difficult relationship with her mother, until she is reminded of a folk story her father – voiced by Richard E. Grant (of Dracula, Corpse Bride, and Downton Abbey fame) – used to tell.

Delighted with the achievement, Darby told Cherwell, “The award was a massive surprise and is a huge help – it really puts the film out there and boosts our distribution budget. We were pretty humbled and shocked at the awards ceremony – we didn’t expect to get anything so we were very glad we turned up!”

West-Knights, who plays Lily, shared Darby’s delight. She explained, “The award was certainly a surprise. Making the film was a great experience – everyone involved with the process was really committed to making it as good as it could be within our capabilities, which made all the difference to the final film I think. Hopefully there are more pleasant surprises to come as we hear back from other festivals!”

Founded in 1996, the Portobello Film Festival describes itself as a “reaction to the moribund state of the British film industry”, and it aims to “provide a forum for new film-makers and give exposure to movies on different formats.” Many of the filmmakers shown at the festival have since been recognised by the mainstream film industry – Guy Ritchie, for instance, was shortlisted in 1996 for his film The Hard Case.

The Wishing Horse is the first film produced by ABG Productions, founded in May 2013 by Aidan Grounds and Emily Precious, the latter having recently worked on The Man Who Knew Infinity, starring Dev Patel and Jeremy Irons.

Grounds told Cherwell that they were “delighted to win the award … The Wishing Horse was the first film we made, and we can’t wait to keep making more in the future.”

Darby was keen to credit ABG with spearheading Oxford’s rising film scene, explaining, “Over the last two years loads of people have been making interesting films, the scene has really gone from zero to hero.

“When I was at the end of my first year there wasn’t much of a film scene at Oxford. Aidan and Emily were keen to make sure that the profits made from their student productions at Oxford were reinvested to support the development of a film scene in Oxford. I had the idea to set up the film fund, and Thelma Holt found additional funding make it a reality. That’s now been turned into the Oxford Broadcasting Association, which I run with Ksenia Harwood after Anatole Sloan set it up last year.

“The majority of the team [working on the film] were Oxford grads who had only done theatre before – they pretty much all work in film now.”

The project was funded with support from Oxford’s Vice Chancellor, Andrew Hamilton, to whom Darby is extremely grateful. He explained, “We also had help from various kind friends through a Kickstarter project and Oxford student drama bodies. Later down the line we were generously supported by Exeter and St. Catz JCRs.”

While he describes the project as a “ton of work”, “exhausting”, and “painstaking”, he told Cherwell that “working with the cast was one of the most enjoyable bits of it as I had much more experience in that area, and Imogen (West-Knights) in particular was fantastic to work with – she is a very responsive and subtle actress.”

Darby continued, “We’re planning on using the prize money to submit to more festivals – we’re screening in Southampton in October, and are waiting to hear back from a quite a few others.”

Darby hopes for more of the same success when his next films – titled “Waterbird” and “Catkins” – are released over the next few weeks.

See the film’s website for more information. Details about Darby’s next films, Waterbird and Catkins, can be found here.

Review: MTV’s Snack-Off

0

TV is a difficult medium for food basically because it is food. Until SMELL-O-VISION or Lick-A-Vision become commonplace, there will always be an element of food TV that is impossible for the audience to experience.

This is probably why most focus on something other than the food – for Come Dine with Me it’s drunken arguments, for Hell’s Kitchen it’s the fact that Gordon Ramsay swears at his contestants, who meanwhile threaten to stab each other. My personal favourite shows are those which have an element of creativity, but also don’t take themselves too seriously, and my current favourite is MTV’s Snack-Off.

The show works around the limits of the medium by using comedy and silliness, and focusing on the ridiculous and incongruous aspects of the food. The contestants are amateur cooks in their 20s who make a snack out of other snack foods like chips, crackers, and peanut butter within a set amount of time.

The results are usually fairly gross-looking, and according to the Daily Mail one of the judges said she felt sick after eating  these foods all the time but there is also a kind of perverse delight in the gross-ness of things like bacon-crushed crackers and tuna melts. The prize is a thousand dollars and winning ‘The Golden Spork’ as well as a supposed mention in some as yet non-existent cookbook.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10181%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Snack-Off is the brainchild of Rob Dyrdek who is best known for Ridiculousness which is basically just You’ve Been Framed but with bad anal sex jokes. Ridiculousness manages to be both crass and dull which makes Snack-Off a surprise success, but this may be because Dyrdek is not a host. The real strength of the show is the tone. The judges swear, take Instagram photos of their food, and generally mess around.

The judges have excellent camaraderie and it’s nice to see Eddie Huang finally host a TV show. He is the perfect host, managing to join in with the other hosts but not attempting to hog the limelight. The judges are a good mix of  funny (Yassir Lester and Chrissy Teigen) and serious ( Jason Quinn).  Essentially, I like Snack-Off because it’s everything GBBO isn’t. It’s laid-back, silly, and doesn’t take itself too seriously. It may be crass and have seemingly little ambition but it also doesn’t induce the same anxiety of GBBO‘s pastel purgatory.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10182%%[/mm-hide-text] 
The judges.

 

Review: Medea

0

When confronted with a production of this calibre – so absorbingly relevant, so in tune with our society’s downward-spiralling pattern of destruction – it can come as a shock to remember that Medea was written by a man, Euripides, in the 5th century BC, to be performed by men for an exclusively male audience. Out of what might well have been intended as a warning of the consequences of uncontrolled female passion, not an exploration of the suffering produced by gender inequalities, the National Theatre have created a harsh immediacy from the text, aided by Ben Powers’ innovative translation.

The chorus, making the most of their unique position as intermediate between characters and spectators, contribute with consonantly dark choreography. The way in which their rigidly awkward, puppet-like movements during Jason’s first dance with his new bride give way to the twitching and juddering of malfunctioning mechanical dolls seem to express something more than how the gods can be puppeteers of human action. It contrasts the expressionless, desireless objects that the women of the play are expected to be with the awful malfunction that occurs in Medea’s mind when the strain of this act becomes too much: a strain demonstrated as Medea, in an expertly judged performance by Helen McRory, must put on a mask of weakness, apologising for her womanly tearfulness while begging Creon, the father of Jason’s new wife, not to exile her and her children.

This is made all the more powerful by occasional glimmers of how she once was – in her vivacious humour, her formidable intelligence now put to a terrible use, in how other characters, those who knew her in the past, treat her with such love and concern. Capitalising on this tension in an intensely dramatic but rather overt example of extreme bipolarity, Medea’s monologue at one point becomes a spilt-personality conflict between a timidly uncertain self, appalled by what she is compelled to do, and a roaring, demonic ferocity that possesses her. This was a technique also put to slightly better use in Alex Kingston’s portrayal of Lady Macbeth last year.

Danny Sapani convinced as Jason, a character endlessly capable of turning the stomach as he switches allegiance with the ease of someone whose only concern is political advantage. “You are my proudest achievements”, he tells his sons as if they are just an addition to his collection of trophies, while utterly incapable of meaningfully interacting with them. Watching his calculated and powerful fury giving way to shaken, horrified impotence in the face of Medea’s crime creates an unsettling emotional mix of devastation and elation.

But her crime is no act of insanity. Hints of her psychological motivations remain almost understandable when they surface: her evident traumatisation by difficult childbirth was left unresolved, as must have been the case for so many women in a time of extremely limited knowledge of both medicine and of the mental stress which such experiences could exert. The focus on Jason and Medea’s failed marriage, arguing in a way that couples have clearly argued for millennia, also resonates as a reminder of how this is a story that is being retold endlessly. For its deeply relevant depiction of how experiences of betrayal can brutalise anyone, this is certainly not a performance to miss as its National Theatre Live Encore screenings are broadcast to cinemas this September.

Down it fresher!

0

Prospect of the new term making you work up a sweat? Feeling thirsty after the long summer? Well you needn’t worry! Here’s your go-to guide for the best places in Oxford to grab a drink. Be it on the way to a morning lecture or a weekend catch-up with friends, whatever the time and whatever the taste, we’ve got it covered.

Best for… COFFEE LOVERS

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10179%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Branca

Wanting a coffee, but not just any old coffee? Branca’s the place to go for the swankiest coffee in Oxford. Expect a complimentary Italian biscotti and a glass of water, lemon and ice with every order.

The Missing Bean

This independently run espresso bar has built up a reputation for its freshly made Italian coffee. The laid-back atmosphere makes it perfect for a quick drop-in with friends.

Turl Street Kitchen

Coffee not your thing? Famous amongst Oxford students, Turl Street Kitchen offers an outstanding array of herbal teas with comfy sofas to match. From delicate green tea to exotic fruit infusions, the choice is endless.

 

Best for… JUICE AND MILKSHAKE LOVERS

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10180%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Queen’s Lane Coffee House

Don’t be deceived by the name – providing freshly pressed juices since 1654 and conveniently placed on the High Street, these juices are both refreshing and affordable.

Moo Moo’s Milkshakes

Always packed, you haven’t had a milkshake until you’ve gone to Moo Moo’s. Freshly made to order, these creamy, frothy milkshakes will hit the spot any day. Why not treat yourself and grab an ice-cream to match?

Shaken Stephen’s

Whether you fancy a super sweet milkshake or a super healthy fruit boost, come here for a drink that’ll please those taste-buds, and give you an instant pick-me up.

 

Best for…COCKTAIL LOVERS

Raoul’s Bar

Using homemade ingredients and more fruit “than any other bar in Oxford”, Raoul’s offers cocktails that are great value whatever the time. Feeling creative? Get in contact for a Cocktail Masterclass with the super-friendly bartenders.

The House

Fitted with a slick monochrome interior and cream leather seats – not to mention an outdoor private terrace – this is one of the classiest bars in Oxford to enjoy a drink.

Angels Cocktails

Angels tailor their cocktails to suit even the most specific taste, making them right before your eyes. Almost half the price during happy hour and offering a free serving of nuts with every order, there’s every reason to head here on a Friday night.

British athletes’ success bodes well

0

August’s European Athletics Championships in Zurich was full of drama and there is a welcome air of optimism in the team GB camp after a highly successful championships.

Forty-year-old Jo Pavey hit headlines the world over for her scintillating performance on the first, winning gold in the 10,000m only eleven months after the birth of her second child. The Briton is the oldest ever female athlete to win a European title. It goes without saying that Pavey’s resolute run spurred on the rest of the British team (talk less of several middle-aged mums!) to hunt for greatness in their own events.

Mo Farah gunned for gold the next day in the men’s 10,000 and got his prize, as he is often does. This win had a different flavour to it, however, as only a few weeks before the Olympic champion had suffered a severe health scare, which included him collapsing and having to be airlifted to hospital. Behind Mo, compatriot Andy Vernon fought for silver. A few minutes after these medals had been won, 23-year-old Ashleigh Nelson got another medal for Team GB, this time a bronze – running 11.22 behind Dutchwoman Dafne Schippers who won in 11.12 seconds, and France’s Myriam Soumaré (11.16). More was to come. American-born Tiffany Porter won her first ever gold in the 100m hurdles, in a time of 12.76 secs. The medals just kept rolling in for the Union Jack team; a matter of minutes later James Dasaolu won 100m gold in a time of 10.06 seconds, with Harry Aikines-Aryeetey coming through to take bronze in 10.22, and France’s Christophe Lemaitre seizing the silver (10.13).

There was drama of a different nature on the same day when French steeplechaser Mahiedine Mekhissi-Benabbad had the nerve to take off his shirt some 100m before the finish line and motion furiously to the crowd to join in with his celebration – despite not having officially won the race yet. Ironically, despite blowing his own trumpet, the long-distance runner was disqualified – ostensibly for removing the number that identified him to officials. Mekhissi-Benabbad is already known for causing trouble – in 2011 he was involved in a fight with another Frenchman after a race, and the following year, after winning European gold, he pushed over the mascot as she reached out to congratulate him.

On 15th August, day four of the championships, Martyn Rooney finally won his first European gold medal after years of coming close. The new kid on the block, Matthew Hudson-Smith helped add to Team GB’s medal tally with an impressive second place. Christine Ohuorogu, who has a reputation of delivering at major championships, was this time unable to snag a medal, finishing in fourth place in the women’s 400m after a quiet season. Laura Weightman came through in the 1500m to get a brave bronze for Great Britain. Jodie Williams went one better later in the evening with a silver medal in the 200m, setting a new personal best (22.46) behind the phenomenal Dafne Schippers, who ran the fastest 200m by a European woman in 19 years – 22.03 – despite being a heptathlete. Jodie’s time was the fastest by a British woman since 1984. What’s more, in making the 200m final, Jodie, Bianca Williams and Dina Asher-Smith had become the first set of three women to line up for Britain in this event in over half a century. Bianca finished in fourth place, but unfortunately 18-year-old Asher-Smith was unable to finish, pulling a hamstring halfway through the race. Adam Gemili topped off a much awaited men’s 200m final, beating Christophe Lemaitre to the gold in a time of 19.98 seconds to get his first senior medal.

On the penultimate day of the competition, the Scottish lasses built on their successes in the Commonwealth Games a few weeks earlier. Eilidh Child upgraded her silver from Glasgow to a gold medal in Zurich. The last time a British woman managed such a feat was 20 years earlier, when Sally Gunnell became 400m hurdles champion. Lynsey Sharp also made history with her performance last Saturday, breaking Susan Scott’s Scottish record and smashing her own PB by 0.87 secs to run 1:58.80. Victory was arguably sweeter for Sharp – whose mother and father were international athletes in their own right, her father a competitor at the 1980 Olympic Games and her mother also an 800m runner at the Commonwealth Games – who two years earlier had been denied the opportunity to stand on top of the podium by a doping Russian athlete, and just a few weeks before had been in hospital on a drip. Jo Pavey, the heroic wonder-woman of the opening day, returned to action for the 5,000m final but this time it was seventh place.

The sixth and final day of the European Championships did not disappoint. There was more drama to unfold in the men’s 1500m, where Mekhissi-Benabbad stepped out onto the track again, after being stripped of his earlier gold medal. In a race fraught with bumps and falls, which resulted in Britain’s Charlie Grice taking two rather heavy tumbles, the Frenchman again finished ahead of everyone else, and yet again took the liberty of celebrating before crossing the line. This time, however, he refrained from removing his shirt and clutching it between his teeth for the final quarter of the last lap. His controversial behaviour earned him some boos and critics but this time the distance runner did manage to hold on to his medal. Chris O’Hare worked hard to get the British team another bronze medal.

Mo Farah became the most successful individual athlete in the history of the European Championships and the most decorated British athlete when he won his second gold in Zurich 2014 in the 5,000m. Compatriot Andy Vernon also got his second medal of the championships, this time a bronze. Greg Rutherford added another senior title to his collection with his 8.27m and 8.29m jumps in the long jump. The father-to-be now is now simultaneously Olympic, Commonwealth and European Champion. With the World Championships next year, it seems it won’t be long before the 27-year-old British record holder holds all four major titles.

Team GB medalled in each of the four relays that capped off the championships in Switzerland. The ladies’ 4x400m team made up of Eilidh Child, Shana Cox, Kelly Massey and Margaret Adeoye put in a determined performance to get the bronze in a very close finish: only a few hundredths-of-a-second separated the gutsy French runner, Ukrainian and Adeoye at the finish line. The men triumphed in their 4x400m final, an event in which we have proved medal-worthy at every  European Championships since 1978. This time it was a gold, brought home by the team of Conrad Williams, Matthew Hudson-Smith, Michael Bingham and Martyn Rooney.  

The remarkable successes of their fellow British athletes on the final day must have fired up the 4x100m teams. For a short while after the four-lap relay victory, James Ellington, Harry Aikines-Aryeetey, Richard Kilty and Adam Gemili ran a time of 37.93 seconds, to win a confident relay gold ahead of Germany and France. The women followed, not only managing to beat the French and Russian teams, but also managing to break a 34-year-old British record, lowering it to 42.24 seconds. Even more remarkably, eleven days later, (and again in Zurich) the British girls rounded down the record again – this time to 42.21.

It seems safe to say that we are in a new season of British athletics. Relays are being won confidently, rather than wrecked by terrible baton changes. Sprints are being won. Records are being broken. At this year’s European Athletics Championships, Britain topped the table, with 12 gold medals and 23 medals overall, more than Team GB has ever managed before.  It seems the legacy of London 2012 is still in the air…

Review: alt-J – This Is All Yours

0

★★★★★

Five Stars

I remember where I was when I first heard alt-J’s debut album, An Awesome Wave, from beginning to end. It was on a routine journey home from London, and as the train passed through the ever-extending suburbs, I got a glimpse into the lighted windows of row upon row of tall terraced houses that back onto the track. The train flitted past a flick-book of anonymous lives, random people living their evening hours, unaware that their movements were captured by fast-moving passers-by, and the music: intense, intimate, fleeting, seemed to fit perfectly.

Alt-J’s fragmented lyrics possessed a kind of modest, commonplace focus, which, when held in impenetrable poetry and shrouded in their signature developing electric folk-rock riffs, imbued the normal with a slightly twisted sense of the surreal. Take the opening lines of ‘Fitzpleasure’ as an example – the song begins, “Tralala, in your snatch fits pleasure, broom-shaped pleasure, / Deep greedy and Googling every corner.” Just like the private worlds viewed from a fast moving train, recognisable images are conjured, but they’re held just out of reach of full comprehension.

Perhaps this was a formula that helped alt-J to create a hugely successful mercury award-winning first album: isolating and reshaping the familiar into something new and distinctive, distanced from its contemporaries. Even the band themselves adhered to this pattern of cloaking normality with artistry, the four camera-shy members obscured for the most part by the Δ symbol of their anti-brand. Whether such an achievement could be sustained in the midst of an industry that seems to have both an insatiable thirst for individuality and a tendency to drain it dry, it remained to be seen.

Two and a half years on and we have our answer. This Is All Yours, a thirteen track LP replete with the same unmistakable craftsmanship and intrigue has arrived, its integrity intact. A similar poetic ambiguity pervades lead-singer Joe Newman’s lyrics, but this time around, there’s a shift in focus from inside the windows to outside, as the songs take on a larger field of vision. The music videos for the singles already released are testament to this. Gone are the dimly-lit domestic scenes of that unforgettable Breezeblocks video, replaced by broad-sweeping landscapes in lead track ‘Hunger of the Pine’: 

From the distorted blurry vocals in the background of ‘Intro’ to the hypnotic harmonies at the peak of ‘The Gospel of John Hurt’, words and music are inseparable in the overall effect. That the lines “The idea of life without company fell suddenly / It crashed through the ceiling on me/ And pinned me to the pine’ are set almost disconcertingly to a single acoustic guitar, returning to the soft, gently bouncing chorus line “Are you a pusher or are you a puller?” only makes track 11, ‘Pusher’ darker for the tense contrast.

Other highpoints include ‘Every Other Freckle’ with its dense, rhythmic layers that rise and fall with unfailing energy, and ‘Choice Kingdom’, a compelling requiem that subverts ‘Rule Brittania’ into an echo of something long lost.

And then, of course, there’s ‘Bloodflood pt.II’, the penultimate track on the album and a sequel to the song of the same name on An Awesome Wave. Not only does it allow for the enjoyable task of spotting consistencies – musical and lyrical threads of continuity between two very differently directed albums – it is also a really powerful song in its own right.

Whilst in this track lyrics from ‘Fitzpleasure’ and ‘Bloodflood’ are taken verbatim and reframed in a new simpler and more controlled style, one element in particular on This Is All Yours marks a noticeable shift away from ongoing narrative of An Awesome Wave. And no, it’s not the unexpected appearance of Miley Cyrus in the wings of ‘Hunger of the Pine’…

The other pre-released single, ‘Left Hand Free’, is clearly the anomaly of the album. Although not a bad song, per se, it feels uncomfortably empty in comparison to the other tracks. The reason behind its incongruous inclusion, as a Guardian interview reveals, is that the band were urged by their American label to produce something more accessible that could be marketed at a ‘hit’. If nothing else, it demonstrates the bands versatility in being able to churn out an undeniably catchy tune on demand.

Moreover, the fact that evidence of the commercial pressures and influences of the industry is confined to one song out of thirteen, is proof of alt-J’s resilience to the temptations and pitfalls of early success. They have conquered the notorious challenge of following a well-received debut with an equally accomplished second album, one that tries neither to tread the exact same path nor to experiment too far or reinvent too drastically.

If we are to compare the two, as everyone inevitably will, This Is All Yours feels lighter than its predecessor, the songs less saturated and insistent. As the title would imply, they passively offer themselves to the listener; their tightly interwoven melodies trickling with an ease that could unfairly be mistaken for complacency or weakness. On the contrary, however, this is an album in which less can most definitely be said to be much, much more.

‘A third of young women have been groped,’ finds NUS study

0

According to National Union of Students (NUS) data 37% of women and 12% of men say they have faced unwelcome sexual advances, in the form of inappropriate groping and touching.

NUS asked over 2,000 male and female students about the issue. The study also looked into ‘lad culture,’ which it defined as “behaviours and attitudes that … belittle, dismiss, joke about or even seem to condone rape and sexual assault.” Two thirds of the respondents were found to have witnessed jokes about rape and sexual assault.

NUS president Toni Pearce stated, “These stats show that harassment is rife on campus, but we still keep hearing from universities that there is no fear, no intimidation, no problem – well this new research says otherwise.”

Meanwhile Laura Bates, of the Everyday Sexism campaign, commented, “Students are experiencing sexism, sexual harassment and assault within the university environment. It is worth mentioning that one category of such experiences ‘inappropriate touching and groping’ actually constitutes sexual assault under UK law. Though many students would not label it as such, this normalisation and lack of awareness is a major part of the problem.”

A lack of awareness of the issue is further highlighted by the fact that 60% of students said they were unaware of any codes of conduct at their university or student union, indicating a lack of knowledge about reporting procedures.

The NUS survey comes only a week after a different study showed that a quarter of young women on a drunken night out had experienced sexual abuse or inappropriate comments. The research was conducted by the charity Drinkaware and had 700 respondents.

When asked about the extent of sexual harassment at Oxford, OUSU Vice President for Women Anna Bradshaw told Cherwell, “While we do not have any Oxford-specific research, anecdotal evidence collected by OUSU’s It Happens Here campaign suggests that many Oxford students have experiences that absolutely reflect these findings.”

Referring to a project planned for this academic year, she added, “The OUSU Sexual Consent Workshops will be compulsory in a third of all common rooms, including over half of JCRs.  These workshops will provide a safe space in which to start community-wide conversations about sexual consent, moving Oxford University towards a culture of enthusiastic and informed consent.”

Review: A Most Wanted Man

0

★★★★☆

Four Stars

When someone in Hollywood dies young, it can be tempting to write a paean of love to them simply because of their early death. Whether they were quite as incredible as people claim to remember, or have perhaps had some of their less saintly qualities buried under tributes and commiserations, the fact remains that often, such praise can be unjustified. For Philip Seymour Hoffman, posthumous star of A Most Wanted Man, this is decidedly not the case.

The film follows an illegal Chechen immigrant, Issa, who arrives in a post-9/11 Hamburg that is determined not to allow the same mistakes to reoccur that saw the architects of that attack live and plot unhindered in the city. As Issa sets red lights flashing all over the CIA and German police’s watch lists, the young human rights lawyer who takes on Issa’s case (Rachel McAdams) has no choice but to rely on a banker (Willem Dafoe) entrusted with Issa’s father’s ill-gotten Cold War millions and an aging, disgraced German intelligence agent, Günther.

Which brings us back to Hoffman. Hugely prolific, the actor tended towards characters who were generally insecure, closeted, perverted, alcoholic, cynical or, on occasion, evil. Boogie Nights, Magnolia, MI3, Happiness, Almost Famous all are perfect examples. Drawn to outcasts and misanthropes, Hoffman was not a cool actor, not a superstar. In this sense, he was perfect for the role of Günther. A tubby, wry, shabby-looking European, gruff but not humourless, Günther shares numerous scenes with his CIA counterpart, Martha, who is ice-cold and composed, perfectly groomed and masterfully flattering. The two could not be more dissimilar. Hoffman brings the character to life as a man with frustrations, with friendships and working relationships, and with a worldview that is neither as cynical as the American’s nor as idealistic as the lawyer’s. He is a heavy-drinking realpolitik guy, moral but also menacing when needed, in charge without appearing to be so. Hoffman’s Günther is the glue that brings all the other characters together in a film that is essentially half character study, half geopolitical statement. It would not be hyperbolic to say that elements of the way he moves and breathes in this film echo the later acting of Marlon Brando.

As for the film itself, the obvious comparison to be made is with 2011’s brilliant Le Carré adaptation Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. A Most Wanted Man is far less complicated to follow, and whilst Tinker Tailor was a showcase for British acting talent, this is a more international affair.  The change of setting from Cold War to War on Terror is one that gives the film its edge, allowing it, ultimately, to criticise the heavy-handed tactics used by the USA and to highlight the human rights abuses of extraordinary rendition and imprisonment without trial. Morality is here measured in delightfully subtle shades of grey. In addition to this, we still get all the traditional spy movie tropes: entrapment, blackmail, meetings in seedy bars and informants.

Sometimes, it seems as though the realism of the espionage can detract from the film’s entertainment value. Le Carré was a spy in Hamburg in the 60s, and one has to take his word on what spying is really like (it must be boring; after all, when was the last time you saw a gunfight in the street between men in suits using futuristic gadgets and driving Aston Martins?) but through the film’s two-hour runtime there are perhaps two scenes in which a character moves at more than a steady walk, nor is a single gunshot fired in the whole movie. That said, those who have read the book will remember the sensational final sequence, which will justify every second of the rest of the film to those with any doubts left.

A quiet, slow-burning and thought-provoking film, A Most Wanted Man represents the final bow of one of the finest actors of his generation, and that alone would be justification enough for existence and success. As it happens, it is also a telling commentary on the global conflict of the 21st century, the impact on those caught up in it, and the sacrifices made in the name of the greater good. Every now and then a film is made that makes you feel guilty if you don’t sit and think for a few minutes as the credits roll; A Most Wanted Man is one of those films.