Tuesday 24th June 2025
Blog Page 1534

BEAUTY CORNER – High Brow

0

When it comes to brows, bold is in. If you have not been blessed with naturally lush brows, you can always achieve the look with help from the myriad of specialist products listed below.

     1. Boost


Use Elizabeth Arden Prevage Clinical Lash + Brow Enhancing Serum, £85, or Blink Nourishing Brow Oil, £16, to help stimulate hair growth.

     2. Tweeze

Keep them in order with Tweezerman’s latest offering: Ultra Precision Tips Tweezers, £34. The hottest shape of the moment is thick and straight, ending the long reign of the high-arch brow.

     3. Soothe


Tweezing can often be quite painful – use Tweezerman’s After Tweeze Soothing Cream, £10, to soothe the irritated skin.

     4. Groom

If you decide to go au naturel, at least keep hairs in place with SpaceNK Eyebrow Comb, £12., Brushing also makes it easier to see where the gaps are when it comes to filling in.

     5. Define â€¨
To help define the shape, use a product such as Tom Ford Brow Sculptor, £32; its angled-shape allows you to make natural looking, hair-like strokes.

     6. Fill in

Use Laura Mercier Brow Power Duo, £20.50, for a more natural effect, or Benefit Instant Brow Pencil, £15, to create the illusion of fuller brows. Blend the edges carefully to keep brows from looking too sharp and take care to not go OTT – you don’t want to end up with man-brows!

     7. Set

To make sure your new look stays put throughout the day, invest in a MAC Brow Finisher, £11.50, or Benefit Speed Brow Quick-Set Brow Gel, £13, which will also tint your brow for a quick fix on-the-go.

     8. High light


One of the best beauty tricks is to use Benefit High Brow, £14, underneath the brow line to really lift it.

 

 

What are Wordsworth?

0

On Monday Keble Arts Festival hosted a poetry evening featuring performances from Steve Larkin, Phoebe Nicholson, Paul Askew and Andrew Ridker. The ways in which the poets interacted with their material made clear the distinction between the performance of poetry and “performance-poetry”. Ridker and Nicholson relied on the natural rhythms of the written word to hold the audience’s attention, while Larkin and Askew’s performances were designed to be theatrical.

Highlights included Steve Larkin, international ‘Slam’ champion of 2004, performing his poem ‘Fat Sex’ – a piece inspired by reading women’s magazines on the loo. Meanwhile, Paul Askew got some laughs with his rendition of ‘The Holiday’ – an angry diatribe against a vacation in Scotland. Phoebe Nicholson created a very different atmosphere, with her powerful readings of ‘Dutch and Flemish Still-Life’; poetry inspired by her Devon home-life; and ‘Cat in the Lanes’ – an ode to her cat who ran away for a year and a half, only to reappear just before her finals. Andrew Ridker amused us with his anecdotal poetry about American life and began by relating his grandmother’s advice to him aged twelve: “women like to talk, but men like to fuck”.

For Phoebe Nicholson, “performing is the best way to get in touch with people and get your work out there”, but she wouldn’t call herself a performance poet. “Poetry performs itself,” she tells us. Nicholson started doing live poetry recitals at the Catweazle Club, a bar in Oxford that hosts open mic nights in which anything goes. She now edits the quarterly magazine ‘Catweazle’, which features a variety of stories, poems and visual arts features. For Nicholson, “there always needs to be an element of sound in poetry but not necessarily through performance – it can be achieved just as much from the cadences on the page”. This is evident in her work, as despite not being intentionally theatrical, the lilting steady rhythm that she adopts is hypnotic. Nicholson’s mellow reading allows the words themselves to resonate.

Paul Askew is right when he says, “I don’t do the whole banter thing very well, so I’ll just do some poems.” Telling us “love poetry is so annoying”, he proceeds to perform his own rendition of a love poem, ‘#YOLO’, in which he explores how many times you can say the word ‘kissing’ before the sound becomes meaningless. A lot of times, as it turns out. His book, Animal Magnetism, comes out in June. This raises the issue of whether performance poetry translates well onto the page. Askew is very aware of this. “The arrogance of page poets is they think they don’t need to put effort into performing, whereas the performance poet often forgets it needs to be edited before going on the page.”

Steve Larkin takes performance-poetry to its extreme, reciting off by heart, and occasionally bursting into song, accompanied by an octave mandolin. He relies on audience participation, and in between poems shows his flair for selfdeprecating stand-up: “I’m at that tricky gap between the time you leave full-time education and the time you die.” Larkin doesn’t publish, and says he never will. He conceives all his work out loud, not on the page, and is irritated by the education system’s insistence on the analysis of poetry.

“The importance of creativity is negated – it distances you from an experience of the actual poetry.” Larkin is the founder of Hammer & Tongue, the biggest promoters of ‘Slam’ poetry in the UK. The final of the Oxford round is on 14th May. Oxford’s decision to appoint Geoffrey Hill over Larkin as Professor of Poetry is perhaps indicative of the fact that performance-poetry has yet to be taken seriously as a medium. But it is at its most refreshing when it reminds us that poetry has always been read aloud.

Hair-razing artwork

0

Adam Wozniak’s decision to shave off his considerable mane of hair in the name of ‘art’ was something that I couldn’t wait to witness. He began his performance with shoulder length hair – presumably the product of at least two years of growth. Five minutes later he was almost bald. I had thought this was a drastic act of attention-seeking, but the look on his face as his tresses fell to the floor said otherwise. It seemed like this actually meant a lot to him. I expected the locks to be lopped off by the artist himself (perhaps with a sword?), but instead we were witnessing a haircut. The barber used an electric razor and worked his way round his scalp in a spiral. The transformation was fascinating to watch and by the end Wozniak looked like a different person. Unfortunately the barber got carried away with the attention and took an excessive amount of time and care in finishing off the cut. This detracted from the momentum of the piece.

When he had finally left, the ‘real’ art began. Wozniak’s hair had fallen to the floor in a matted pile, which he proceeded to make into a rather straggly paintbrush. Using a long wooden pole and some gaffer tape, Wozniak’s tool resembled a broomstick. He then mixed a trough of watery pale blue paint in front of us, smearing the excess on his newly shaved head.

Accompanied by Indian music, Wozniak proceeded to dunk his ‘brush’ in the mixture and turned to face a huge transparent canvas. His method of painting can only be described as esoteric. In mock tai-chi style, Wozniak waved his long pole before beginning a series of bold strokes and occasionally lunging at his canvas. The final piece was a combination of long sweeping lines. It was constructed as a triptych, but he allowed his composition to cross the boundaries of the frame. Although the piece was striking, it was more interesting as a product of the performance than as a standalone work. Bold and bald, Wozniak’s artistic concept was new and engaging. Occasionally the execution was self-indulgent .

Wozniak took his project very seriously, sometimes to a laughable extent. I’m not sure what he was trying to prove, but the performance was a reminder of the transient nature of art: hair today, gone tomorrow

Light-hearted Art

0

Is a solitary dangling light bulb ‘art’? This was a question that plagued me as I wandered around the Hayward Gallery’s current sellout exhibition – Light Show.

Although some of the works in this exhibition are distinctly unimpressive, what the Hayward Gallery does well is provide a somewhat erratic collection of ‘firsts’. In the last room of the exhibition, strobe lighting is turned on a series of mini water-fountains. Olafur Eliasson uses flashing light to create freeze-frame images of water as it splashes, falls, and bounces off itself. This may not be ‘art’, per se, but it is great fun to watch.

Part of the problem with the exhibition is that many of the rooms contain multiple installations that invariably detract attention from each other. The  most exciting pieces are those allowed rooms of their own. For the two works that submerge you in colour, visitors are required to wear white plastic  overshoes or go barefoot. Removing your shoes in an art gallery is almost as exciting as the three rooms of Chromosaturation, by the Venezuelan artist Carlos Cruz-Diez. They pleasingly demonstrate everything you learned in  school about mixing colours – the walls are veritable rainbows.

Best of all is Anthony McCall’s You and I, Horizontal (2005). A blackened, hazy room features what at first seems to be only a projection. When you stand inside the light and face into the projector, you discover yourself in a smoky light tunnel that seems to have solid walls. Playing with shadows becomes more fun than you could have imagined.

Does the amusement of these “immersive environments” detract from their artistry? Or is the Hayward Gallery right – and light’s ability to ‘sculpt and shape space in different ways’ is what makes it artful? Their blurb tells us: “Light has the power to affect our state of mind as well as alter how we perceive the world around us.”

 
This exhibition has a bit of everything. It varies hugely in quality from cheap optical gimmicks to beautiful and inspiring installations. It features all kinds of light sources – LED, neon, projections, bulbs, stage lights, strobes. Highly complex computer-programmed light displays share rooms with light boxes stolen from scrap heaps. The Hayward Gallery has hit the mark again. They provide exactly what they offer – a show. It is a fairground of light in all of its spatial and sensory forms. As an exhibition, there is no development, merely party trick after party trick. But Light Show challenges what it is to be art. In combination the sculptures and installations create an appreciation of what light is and how it can be artistic. Light Show is refreshing and thought-provoking, but even if you don’t take light bulbs seriously, this exhibition is great fun, and a treat for the eyes.

Who’s That Girl?

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7378%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7379%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7380%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7382%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7381%%[/mm-hide-text] 

 

CLOTHES Topshop crop-top, LNA zip shorts, Maje floral dress, Forever 21 sunglasses, Superga trainers

MODEL Francesca Geoghegan
PHOTOGRAPHER & STYLIST Tamison O’Connor

Freshers ‘black up’ at St Hugh’s

0

Two St Hugh’s students caused controversy after ‘blacking up’ at a bop last Saturday.

The bop theme was ‘Song Titles’, and the students – both freshers – arrived dressed as ‘Ni**as in Paris’, after the Kanye West and Jay-Z song. Their costumes included ‘blacked up’ faces and signs around their necks saying ‘In Paris’.

The bop took place on Saturday 20th April. Cherwell understands that after another student advised them to remove the outfits, one did so, while the other remained in costume.

One of the students told Cherwell, “I would like to express my sincere regret for my actions. In hindsight I see that what I did was wholly unacceptable and a terrible misjudgment on my part. My intention was never to offend and I am deeply sorry for the upset caused.”

The other student also apologised, stating, “I am extremely sorry for my actions. I realise now that it was completely inappropriate and I had no intention of being derogatory or offensive.

“I did not consider the consequences of my actions and I thoroughly regret any offence caused. As soon as it was expressed that my actions were inappropriate I proceeded to remove the face paint.”

St Hugh’s JCR are carrying out an inquiry into the incident. Thomas Pope, JCR President, told Cherwell, “St Hugh’s JCR condemns racism in all its forms.”
Pope described the costume choice as arrising from “a severe lack of judgement”.

Several students criticised the costumes. Melvin Mezue, President of Oxford Africa Society, opined to Cherwell that he didn’t, “find [the costumes] offensive personally.” Nevertheless, he continued, “While I do not think this was motivated by hatred…I do worry about the lack of cultural sensitivity and emotional maturity displayed here.

“Our experience is that such acts are not uncommon around the university; it is likely a product of the way students are taught to imagine other cultures – as foreign objects and topics for consumption.”

Mezue said that the university intake needed to “properly reflect the contemporary cosmopolitan era” and that he “feared we can continue to expect this kind of behaviour.”

Oxford University rejected criticism of Oxford’s alleged lack of diversity. A spokesperson stated, “The University strongly condemns any form of racism, or any action – whatever the intent – which is potentially detrimental to good race relations.

“The University’s aim is to provide an inclusive environment which promotes equality and values diversity, and we believe that the overwhelming majority of students and staff share this aim and these values.”

The spokesperson continued, “We refute in the strongest terms the allegation that Oxford students are ‘taught to imagine other cultures as foreign objects and topics for consumption’. Oxford has a global reputation for its advancement of the understanding of other cultures.

“It is also one of the most international universities in the world, with staff and students coming from over 140 countries.”

The incident comes after Oxford University was accused of “institutional bias” by Labour MP David Lammy in February. Lammy’s comments responded to a Guardian investigation which reported that ethnic minority applicants were less likely to recieve an offer.

The Guardian found that in 2010-2011, 25.7% of white applicants received an Oxford offer, compared with 17.2% of students from ethnic minorities.

David Cameron has also previously criticised Oxford’s admissions records. In 2011, he branded the university “disgraceful” for apparently admitting only one black candidate. The University responded by branding the allegation “incorrect and highly misleading.”

Katie Colliver, OUSU VP for Welfare ands Equal Opportunity, said that the two students “should consider attending OUSU’s Equality and Diversity Training”, which is run termly.She condemned the choice of costumes, stating, “‘Blacking up’ for a bop is incredibly culturally insensitive.”

One St Hugh’s student, who wished to remain anonymous, said that he “knows both people involved” and defended them as “not racists, not even in the slightest — they are just very young and very immature.

“Obviously had they thought at length and with sensitivity then they would not have dressed as they did.”

Nathalie Cooper, a second year History student, opined, “What I find most upsetting is that [one of the students] was told it was insulting so she knowingly caused offence – she can’t claim what she did was out of ignorance”.

JCR motion throne out

0

A motion was proposed at Balliol this week to buy the Iron Throne featured in the HBO TV series “Game of Thrones”.

The “Motion of Thrones” was originally put forward by Angus Hawkins and Josh Jones. The two JCR committee members’ motion argued that the JCR needed the throne because “Balliol College JCR currently lacks authority in the realm of Westeros” and “an Iron Throne can be purchased for only USD $30,000, with free delivery.”

However, after intense discussion, the motion was defeated due to concerns over the effect it would have on the JCR’s finances.

Hawkins told Cherwell, “Frankly, I’m shocked that it didn’t pass. I’m inclined to blame my co-sponsor Josh Jones, who betrayed me at the last minute and voted against the motion, in much the same way that the Mad King was betrayed by the Kingslayer, Jaimie Lannister. I subsequently removed his right hand in retribution.”

However, Jones argued in response “As important as I think it is for the JCR to own the Iron Throne, I will only ever pay the Iron price. As such, buying it using JCR funds would be against my Ironborn beliefs.”
The motion also sought to increase the power of Balliol’s JCR President, Alex Bartram.

In the wording of the motion, Bartam is referred to as “Alex of House Bartram, the first of his name”. Hawkins and Jones suggested “that strong Presidential authority is essential to orderly GMs” and that “The Iron Throne confers such authority.”

They further stated in the motion that Bartram was a far superior contender to the Iron Throne than Joffrey Baratheon.

There were mixed responses to the motion within Balliol’s JCR. Rebecca Hannon, a Balliol Game of Thrones fan, opined, “Although I would have loved to have seen the soughtafter Iron Throne of Westeros residing in Balliol, it was a lot of money so I can see why it wasn’t to be.”

The motion also contained a clause whereby a seven inch replica of the throne, costing £34.99 would be bought instead, if the JCR thought the life size throne too expensive. It was suggested by Hawkins and Jones that a smaller model “confers much the same advantages”.

However Richard May, a committee member of the JCR told Cherwell, “The motion said that the committee could buy the 7 inch replica instead if they judged the $30k one too expensive, but someone pointed out that it would be unconstitutional for the committee to overrule the JCR like that, so if it passed we’d HAVE to buy the $30k one.”

At the time of print $30, 000 is equal to just under £20,000.
Despite the expense many of the students supported the motion.

Richard further opined, “Half of us thought it would be hilarious, and the treasurer supported it too. But enough people were boring and sensible to kill it.”

Although the throne featured in the series is meant to be made out of swords, the replica version is made out of fiberglass. The HBO website boasts that it is seven feet tall and that “calling it ‘impressive’ in an understatement”.

The GM motion also said, “Winter is coming” and “Where are my dragons”.

Haven’t they Don well?

0

I arrived to interview Don Broco before their sold-out headline slot at the O2 Academy last Wednesday to find fangirls already sitting on the pavement. Since the release of the band’s hook-heavy debut, the album and their live reputation have added to their gathering momentum, which was easily seen in the line starting to snake down Cowley Road. The band were running fashionably late, of course, so I hid at the back of soundcheck and waited.

I spoke, ensconced in the maze of corridors that is backstage at the O2, with the lead singer, Rob Damiani. The tour has seen them headlining in places that they came to in support of other bands not long ago and Damiani seemed almost surprised by their rise, describing it as ‘amazing’ when you consider that they ‘were putting on (their) own shows a few years ago and would turn up just hoping there’d be a few people to play to’. This is partially due to the success of the album, from which the fifth and final single ‘Whole Truth’ will be released on April 22nd. The single also has a ‘Club Sex’ remix which is a name the band used to play under for two or three shows when they first started- it was discarded for fear they’d be ‘pigeonholed’, which is fair enough when you consider that the name apparently sprang from a ‘lads holiday in Kavos’.

It would be unfair to dismiss Don Broco as just being ‘laddish’- although the content of many of their songs and videos could be said to fit that description. Throughout the interview Damiani came across as someone who felt that the band shouldn’t be tied down to one style or genre- when asked who he’d like to collaborate with, he named Diplo; when asked who he’d like to see down at the front of one of their shows he said ‘George Clooney looking dapper’. This particularly came through when asked about lyrics- in particular on ‘Back in the Day’, which was written during the riots- and whether he could envisage any more politically-minded songs. Here he strongly declared that ‘I like to not give myself any limitations when it comes to our music’ although he also described himself as not ‘particularly politically-minded’ and this comes across in most things the band do. They’re no concerned with labels- they’re confident in themselves and their ability.

What can we expect next from the band? Apparently work on a second album is underway, although there’s nothing more than ‘a few demos’- at this point we were interrupted by a very cute puppy which was duly cooed over in a perhaps slightly-less-than-rock fashion by both of us, stunting any talk about a possible album. Don Broco’s next single ‘Whole Truth’ is out on Monday April 22nd and their debut album ‘Possibilities’ is out now. The band are heading out to Europe to support We Are The Ocean and they’re thinking about ‘one or two’ big UK festivals but ‘can’t say anything’ yet… I, for one, will definitely be keeping an eye out.

Styles stays a-Float

0

This is a time where New York City, not-withstanding the throwback attempts of the pro-era crew, is losing it’s rap identity. But Styles P’s latest album Float seems to have evaded the recent emerging trends, primarily by shunning the usual checklist of hip-hop’s current A-list producers and rap tropes. He helps himself by not pandering to the domineering Southern ‘Trap’ style increasingly etching its way into the fabric of many New York rappers such as French Montana and A$AP Rocky.

Given this, Styles P attempts to pay hom- age to the New York boom bap style of the 80s with ‘Take it Back’, though the Maytals sampling feels out of place in the middle of a rather gritty, underground-sounding record. Nonetheless, Float is stripped to the bare bones with fellow LOX member Scram Jones producing every song. This allows for a conceptual constant and common sound largely lost in many contemporary rap albums.

Fans of a time when rappers sought to illustrate the trials and tribulations of an overworked drug baron will find solace in the early parts of the album with tracks such as ‘Manson Murder’ and ‘Bodies in the Base- ment’. By ‘Red-Eye’ Styles, however, takes a well-earned vacation from all his stress, lavishing in ‘Audemars and Oyster Perpetuals’. On ‘Reckless’, Styles takes time to assure us “I’m a criminal rappin’” and, given that this is his eleventh musical project, it appears these bois- terous claims are the ones that fans have found consistent comfort in. Styles P’s astute lyrical talent does remain on show throughout the album, beckoning through Jones’ simplistic but thuggish, head-nodding productions. This, complemented by brief appearances from old accomplices such as Jadakiss and Wu-Tang’s Raekwon, make in total for a very inoffensive but listenable work.

Download: Take it Back

Listen here