Sunday, May 25, 2025
Blog Page 155

Some habits die hard: the truth about Oxford’s Coffee Culture

The baristas in Cornmarket Pret know my coffee order on sight. My friends rarely see me without a strong black Americano in hand. You might say I’m an extreme case, or express concern that coffee can be such a fundamental part of my personality. But is my love of caffeine really so rare, or merely symptomatic of a wider Oxford coffee culture which affects us all?

To find out, I did some digging into the coffee habits of the average Oxford student, including our key motivations for drinking the stuff, our patterns of consumption, and its bearing on our daily activities. After polling over 300 Cherwell readers on social media, the results have been strikingly diverse, showing that Oxford students have a far more complex relationship with coffee than you might expect… 

Why do we drink coffee?

First, I asked participants to identify the primary purpose of their caffeine consumption. Perhaps unsurprisingly for a student population weighed down with intense academic pressure, 71% of respondents said they mainly drink coffee to help them work. Well, as far as I’m concerned, it’s true: few things beat coffee for getting you through a gruelling 9am tutorial. At the same time, however, this reaffirms the place coffee has come to occupy in “hustle culture”. Many of us see it as a performance drug rather than something purely enjoyable, which we accept without thinking here in Oxford.

Perhaps this explains my surprise when some cafés I’ve visited abroad haven’t actually served Americanos. Indeed, cafe latte only seems to be the status quo in quite a lot of European cities, and my compulsion to chug black coffee through the day has been looked on with varying degrees of incredulity by the continent’s most artisanal baristas.

For some Oxford students, however, all hope is not lost, as 25% of survey respondents said they primarily drink coffee when meeting friends. This reveals a more refined and continental attitude to coffee, and we can’t deny that this is nice: for many, gossip about nasty tutors and relationship drama is infinitely enhanced by a chocolatey cappuccino or oat milk latté.

But the third “key motivator” for caffeine consumption among Oxford students is arguably the most interesting, with the remaining 4% confessing that they mainly drink coffee for political advancement. Yes, as Oxford Union hacks well know, “to coffee” is a #VERB. These political grifters and officership aspirants have generally mastered the art of hustling (requires coffee) with the aim of winning friends (also requires coffee). And thus, without Oxford’s abundant landscape of well-situated cafés, who knows? Election season may be at risk of grinding to a halt altogether…

Coffee or sleep?

But what does this reliance on coffee – whatever its reason – actually do to us as human beings? Determined to answer a question my wellwishers ask periodically, I wanted to set this in the context of what Oxford students think about sleep. When asked in a concurrent poll, 77% of respondents said they don’t feel they get enough sleep during term. In fact, 56% (159) of a total 287 students asked say they get less than the recommended eight hours of sleep per night.

And while I don’t have precise statistics for how much of a direct impact coffee has on this, I did receive a number of comments in response to the overall poll which elucidated:

“Coffee is a necessity to survive here” – 3rd year, St John’s

“My espresso machine is as vital to my functioning as my laptop” – 2nd year, Merton

“I would fall asleep in labs without it” – 2nd year, Oriel

One student even told me: “Corpus has a free coffee machine… it’s like the Hunger Games!”

Speaking from personal experience, it’s hard to deny that Oxford’s love of coffee is inextricably linked to our penchant for regular all-nighters at any cost. 

Favourite coffee shops?

So which establishments profit from our love of coffee and which are Oxford students’ favourite haunts? I personally have no clear-cut answer in this regard. As a firm believer in art of the political (or journalistic!) coffee, I’ve actually drawn up a “Coffee Map” of Oxford, which helps me choose where to meet people based on security, atmosphere, and intimacy of location.

However, there are some places which can’t go unmentioned. Pret a Manger, for starters, is a staple of many students’ existence: with three of them in the town centre to choose from, this outcome was unavoidable. As of last year, we even have a designated Facebook community (OxPret) which was set up to quickly inform other coffee lovers about which store has ice at any given time, and other such things.

As such, Pret will always occupy a special place in my heart; not only does its £30 per month subscription help you to get hooked on up to five barista-made drinks per day, but it works out as amazing value for money once you do so. (Without it, five single espresso shots would come to £11.75 per day at the current rate.)

31% of survey respondents evidently reached the same conclusion, saying that they’ve had a Pret subscription at some point in the last year.

Nonetheless, Pret has also gained a reputation for being a little basic: with the Cornmarket outlets becoming a thoroughfare of zombified students every rush-hour, it’s not always the best place for a sophisticated, sit-down coffee.

Of the other, more picturesque options around the city centre, 34% of the 88 students who told me their favourite coffee shop rated Jericho Coffee Traders as a clear winner, with Gulpfiction, Blacksheep, Queen’s Lane Coffee House, and Coffeesmith’s also receiving honourable mentions.

I was pleased that this reflects my own tastes exactly; Pret gets me through the day, but JCT’s “Adventure Blend” is my guilty pleasure. Perhaps this was inevitable – as an Oriel student living right next to JCT, I’ve been there since Day One and haven’t looked back.

Together, these polls show just how rich and multilayered Oxford’s coffee landscape is, and the number of different student perspectives I’ve heard has been fascinating. So, regardless of whether you think I’m an obsessed caffeine addict or a fulfilled coffee enjoyer (not mutually exclusive, by the way), I hope these insights give you something interesting to read over your morning latté.

Open Minds, Open Conversations: An Interview with the LOAF Podcast

I knew vaguely of the podcast run by four of my fellow Christ Church students before interviewing them for Cherwell. It takes hard work to balance any extracurricular alongside an Oxford degree, and I have immense respect for those who manage to pull it off. When I saw via Instagram that the boys of LOAF (Lukas, Ollie, Adam, Faris) had recently interviewed a dame on their podcast, I thought it would make for a fascinating insight into the workings of student-run podcasts, and perhaps, get to know the people behind the voices I didn’t know very well. They enthusiastically agreed to an interview. I have to admit, they had me surprised by the sheer grit and cheerful camaraderie in their approach to this newly discovered educational endeavour.

Podcasting is a versatile platform for students to share their interests and perspectives with a wider audience. This is how the LOAF podcast started out in its initial stages this past Hilary, or a ‘drunk night-out idea’ as the group laughingly shared. After successfully applying for an Oxide slot, the four boys took to a microphone in the comfort of their own accommodation, sharing their distinctive characters and jovial dynamic with an external audience. In a few short months the quartet have doubled down in exploiting the platform to be a professional space for intellectual discussion and influential speakers. but not at the cost of friendly banter. 

When three out of the four podcasters welcomed me into their large room in Christ Church’s Peckwater Quad on a sunny Sunday evening, they were chipper and keen to discuss their creative child. Prior to the interview I’d listened to a handful of episodes. It was their pilot episode on Spotify which sparked my interest the most, although now recently archived. At the core of LOAF is a relatable and lighthearted friendship. Ollie, enthusiastically chatting whilst tossing around a football, describes himself as open and loquacious. Lukas brings the podcast to a more professional standard; after a period on the Oxford Union committee he claims he is happier using his public speaking skills on this intimate platform under his own creative direction. Adam is the creativity behind the scenes, devising imaginative ways to market on social media and gain a wider listenership.  The three boys all agreed that Faris adds a different dimension to the podcast, grounding the group dynamic with a healthy introspective lens. 

The boys explained to me that LOAF cannot be pinned down to a single genre; its variety is what makes it unique. From discussing pop culture to analysing social norms, it was clear that, in their range of topics, all four boys felt strongly about their objective to challenge and educate. Recently having transitioned to a guest-focused professional approach, LOAF has interviewed a handful of influential personalities in supporting this educational mission. Latest speakers include mental health advocate Gabe Howard and ex-CEO of Royal Mail, Dame Moya Greene.

It was Dame Moya, Adam shared, whose cutting words really inspired the group. “She really gave us confidence as podcasters.” With the pull of an Oxford SSO, the gang were pleasantly surprised to discover how many influential people were willing to come and debate contentious topics or simply to offer wisdom relating to a given field.  Detailing her career path, Dame Moya stresses the importance of listening and communication – not only in forging a better relationship between employees and the union, but in getting to know people one resolves disputes and navigates changes fairly and effectively. Chuckling, they claimed they all started listening to each other more after that. 

Looking to the future, the LOAF podcasters hope to grow more confident in their ability to create stimulating discussion. The challenge they are now faced with is how to take their platform a step further. They aim to expand their network of speakers and avoid overly-politicising the podcast. To continue expanding their listenership they must remain neutral and relatable. The purpose of speaker episodes is to delve into interesting topics which are both fun and educational to listen to. The balance between relaxed banter and challenging intellectual conversations helps to stabilise a middle ground, setting LOAF apart from serious politicised platforms. At its core is a lighthearted friendship. 

You can stream the LOAF podcast on Oxide and Spotify

https://www.oxideradio.live/the-loaf-podcast

INSTA: @theloafpod

TikTok: @theloafpodcast

Food Fight! Oxford and Cambridge compete to tackle food poverty

0

This summer, the long-anticipated ‘Great Oxbridge BOGOF’ will be returning for its 3rd run. The food drive competition is run by the charity ‘Because We Can’, and sees the Colleges of Oxford and Cambridge take part in a friendly competition, collecting food and essential items for local food banks. This time, the food drive begins on Saturday 3rd June and ends on Thursday 15th June, with 34 Oxbridge colleges taking part. BOGOF stands for ‘Buy One, Give One Free’, and is based on the idea that when buying an essential item that a local food bank needs, students can buy an extra one and donate it towards the food drive. This simple premise has led to impactful results in the past, with over 15,000 items collected in 2020 and 2021.

The food drive has been coordinated between the Oxford SU, Cambridge SU, and Oxbridge college charity officers. The initiative itself is led by Josh Tulloch, an Oxford alum, ex-LMH JCR president, and founder of the ‘Because We Can’ charity. Having experienced food insecurity and homelessness himself, Josh began food drive competitions while in secondary school in 2014, which grew into the ‘Because We Can’ charity, which aims to use creative ways to solve social problems such as food poverty. 

The lighthearted nature of the friendly competition addresses serious social realities. The campaign comes at a crucial time; Oxford Food Hub have been struggling to keep up with an increase in demand, with many of those who used to donate to the food bank now relying on it. Their coordinator, Spencer Lawes, has said that “food stock levels have decreased yet further, and so the proceeds of this BOGOF challenge will be even more important to us and the charities we support (which is now over 200!)”. The Trussell Trust reported that between April 2022 and March 2023, the number of people that used a food bank for the first time was 760,000, with overall numbers up 37% from the year before. Out of the 3 million emergency food banks distributed in 2022, 1.1 million went to children. On a more local scale, in Oxford itself, 29% of children live below the poverty line, and the number of homeless people has increased by 400% since 2012. 

Josh emphasised the crisis as reflective of wider problems the UK is facing – the cost of living crisis, rising fuel prices, and a shortage of HGV drivers meaning that supply chains that food banks rely on are being disrupted, and the usual supply of food is running low. “There are systemic, structural issues which have been going on for well over a decade now… Just donating to Food banks, who are at the end of the line of more systemic problems, isn’t going to solve these problems.”

In an article written by the Director of Policy at Trussell Trust, it was noted that “food banks and charitable support are not the solution” to the crisis, and that only with real sustainable change, such as reforming universal credit, will the crisis end. The fact that food banks exist is indicative of the failures of the government to keep up with people’s basic needs, or increasing wages to meet rising costs. Though Josh accepts that a food drive is certainly “treating the symptoms” of the crisis, he emphasises that it is something that urgently needs to be done. Alleviating the short term problems while advocating for long term solutions is the way to go:  “We have to take two views of any problem that we see in society. How do we deal with the real hurt and the pain that people are feeling now? It’s no good to go out on the streets with placards calling for systemic change while mothers and fathers can’t feed their children. That’s where we’ve got to do both.”

Through the grandeur of Oxford’s historical buildings and traditions, as well as the countless events and seemingly endless tasks of the typical Oxford student, students are likely to be less aware of “the reality of what’s going on in the world”, which Josh thinks only becomes more evident after leaving university. On an institutional level though, considering the amount of land Oxford colleges own in the area, and the wealth that is amassed through property and endowments, Josh thinks that Oxford could do more to help local communities. “There’s a lot of wealth – inaccessible wealth in the form of property, and accessible wealth like the endowments that colleges manage. There is an institutional disconnect, just in general, between the value that it has for the university itself, and the value that it could have for local communities.”

For now, on the student-led front, an awareness of social issues is key to improving the situation. Josh hopes that the campaign can foster long-term behaviour, for example continuing the momentum of the food drive by donating to the collections found at local supermarkets. As BOGOF develops, the initiative will be pushed towards addressing systemic, institutional issues, and may potentially serve as a model for universities across the UK, leveraging Varsity relationships until the food drive becomes a national competition. 

Reflecting on the previous successes of the BOGOF challenge, Josh said that “as soon as people know about the issue, and know it’s as simple as buying an extra can of food and donating it, they are more than willing to get involved.” Hopefully, understanding that each of our individual donations can create a big difference in the local community will meet the overall target of 10,000 items being collected this year. In the spirit of friendly competition, it also wouldn’t hurt to beat Cambridge for the third time.

Items to donate:  Tinned fruit, veg, pulses etc, cooking oil, rice, pasta, tea, instant coffee, sugar, peanut butter, honey, marmite, breakfast cereals, rice pudding, tinned custard, sweet treats of any kind, toiletries, nappies and sanitary products. 

Follow the ‘Because We Can’ Facebook page to see updates on the challenge and further resources about food poverty: https://www.facebook.com/pg/becausewecanuk/ 

“I’ve been the luckiest actor who will ever be”: In conversation with Sir Derek Jacobi CBE.

0

Sir Derek Jacobi is acting royalty, one of the most distinguished actors of our time.

His career began as a founding member of the National Theatre with Laurence Olivier. Sir Derek is famous for his roles in Shakespeare’s plays including Hamlet, Much Ado About Nothing, Macbeth, Twelfth Night, The Tempest, King Lear and Romeo and Juliet. He has starred on our television screens for half a century – I, Claudius, The Tenth Man, Frasier, Cadfael, The Gathering Storm, Vicious, Last Tango in Halifax and The Crown. His film credits include Othello, The Day of the Jackal, Henry V, Dead Again, Hamlet, Gladiator, Nanny McPhee, The Riddle, My Week with Marilyn, Anonymous, Cinderella and Murder on the Orient Express.

Sir Derek has received many awards, including a BAFTA, two Oliviers, two Primetime Emmies, two Screen Actors Guild Awards, and a Tony. He was knighted in Denmark in 1989 and in the UK in 1994.

I started by asking Sir Derek which of his many iconic roles was the most challenging?

“They’re all very challenging. Every time you are cast, the heart leaps and then sinks to your boots because you think I’ll never make it. Lear. Hamlet. The big Shakespeare roles are very daunting when you’re starting them. To learn them, to get inside them and then to try and communicate them.” 

My next question was whether Sir Derek approaches acting differently in theatre and film? 

“Yes, because of the technical side in the theatre, one of the most important things an actor has is his voice. That doesn’t really count when you’ve got a microphone and camera there – film is more enclosed and much more inner. The big trick of theatre and the big satisfaction of theatre is that you have to get all that which you see on the screen and put it out there and make it real.”

Does he prefer one over the other?

“I did have a preference for theatre but now my preference is for camera. It’s easier and they pay more. You couldn’t make a fortune in the theatre.” 

Does he enjoy the theatre?

“Yes, because you’re sharing it. Hopefully to a large audience, anything up to 2000 people. There are people sitting many, many yards away from you and above you and really close to you and you’ve got to make everybody’s evening.”

Which is his favourite role in Shakespeare. 

“Hamlet. I’ve done it so many times. I mean nearly 500 times. In many places, in many countries, including his hometown Elsinore, in Denmark – so he is favourite and I first played him at school.”

Was Hamlet his first play?

“No, I went to the local grammar school. My first part was drag. The boys had to play the girls. If you were young and pretty, you’ve got the girls’ parts. Hamlet was my first male role in fact!”

What draws him to Shakespeare’s works?

“The best parts, the best language, often the best costumes, the best plots. Also they test you. They really do test an actor – your movement, everything, everything that makes an actor.” 

Sir Derek been a vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights and issues. How has the entertainment industry changed in terms of representation and inclusion, and what do you think still needs to be done?

“Oh, a lot needs to be done. The theatre has always been very open to anything transgender, certainly. When I was a child and you went to pantomime, the principal boy and the leading other boy were always girls. It wasn’t considered unusual in fact. And it wasn’t considered in any way camp or gay. Gay has always worried me. The word gay when I was growing up meant happy. The first thing I discovered when I realised that I was gay was that I wasn’t very happy. But I’m glad that now at least people can talk about it. That awful judgement has gone. Mostly gone, which is good.”

He has also done voice acting for animated films and TV shows. How does Sir Derek’s approach to voice acting differ from live-action acting?

“That’s the best. You don’t have to worry about makeup or clothes or anything, turn up however you like. It’s all in the voice, all in the words. You can either animate to a cartoon where they can see a character and your voice is coming out as that character, or you read a book and you become all the characters in the book but they didn’t see anything – what they see is in their imagination, which is helped hopefully by your voice.” 

Which of his many awards is he the most proud of?

“I think the one that I won last week – the Olivier Lifetime Achievement Award. It was a lovely finish to a life in the theatre.”

He has played historical figures and fictional characters. Does he approach each type of role differently, and how do you prepare for a role when the character is based on a real person?

“Basically, you learn the lines. You put your frock on. You put your makeup on. You get on there and you do it. To get all arsey-farcy about it, it’s not for me anyway. It’s not my approach.” 

But he did it for Hitler?

“When you play someone like Hitler it was actually quite easy – you put that on (the moustache), you do that with your hair, you do a bit of that (the Nazi salute) – its such a caricature – of all the things I have ever done, that was the biggest, in a sense easiest caricature because when I met the director and I was casted – you know I said, “There is nothing Hitler about me, I mean nothing?” Vocally he was interesting, and I am very interested in voice, so that was OK, for the rest it was caricature. It was a silly face.” 

So he didn’t have to do major background research for it?

“Not really. The very first scene I did was a speech to 1,000 people which was very interesting because they put me in an office for two weeks watching videos of him. He did a speech in Nuremberg, and he stood up very tentatively and covered his crotch with his hand, he pulled the table, and he hadn’t said a word – thousands of people. He cleared his throat, pulled it (the table) a bit more towards him, coughed again and started speaking. Hardly anybody could hear him. You could see the audience all went forward to hear what he said. By the end of two hours he was ranting and screaming – it was an extraordinary performance. He was an actor.”

Who is his favourite actor or director that he’s worked with?

“Well, I suppose one of the favourites, actor and director was (Laurence) Olivier, who was aware of actors’ problems, actors’ weaknesses, actors’ fears, actors’ terrors. Because he was one of us. He was wonderful. I think he was best. Sometimes you end up saying to yourself, I’ve got to please him otherwise he will shout at me; but Olivier coaxed. And always at the end, he gave you the confidence that ultimately, you could do it. He trusted you to get that, trusted you to do it. And that was wonderful. Oh and Ken!”

Kenneth Branagh.

“He has an actor’s instinct; he knows how fragile most actors are.”

What would Sir Derek say about his career?

“I’ve been the luckiest actor who will ever be. In my own view, I am the luckiest actor.

I have never had to ask. It’s always been given. I’ve had opportunity after opportunity. I’ve been in the right place at the right time. I’ve never had to hustle. I feel very humbled about that because I know a lot of actors who don’t have that kind of journey, and I’ve had it for a long time.” 

But he seized the opportunities when they came?

“Yes, I’ve seized the opportunities and by doing so, I’ve grown as an actor. I’ve learned as an actor. I’ve expanded as an actor. But that is, again, a great gift that somebody blessed me with.”  

What advice would Sir Derek give to aspiring actors, and what is the key to a successful acting career?

“Don’t do it if you want to do it, do it if you have to do it. You’ll need courage. You’ll need resolution. You’ll need strength. You’ll need a good memory. If you get the opportunity, for goodness sake, enjoy it. Never rubbish it. Never run it down – because you are blessed. Not only you have the talent, but you are given the opportunity not to only show that talent but to improve it. That’s usually in the gift of someone else – the ones who are dishing out the job. 

The theatre is so exciting. Really, really exciting. Terrifying. You stand in the wings on the first night of Hamlet. You’ve got three and a half hours of that – that’s frightening and if you ain’t frightened, you ain’t no good!”

EXCLUSIVE: Gabriel Macht, Ed Norton and Patrick J Kennedy amongst final group of Union speakers this term

0

As the Oxford Union nears the end of Trinity Term, Cherwell can exclusively reveal 4 additional speakers.

American actor Gabriel Macht will be speaking at the Union later in the term. Macht is best known for playing the confident, high-flying, ambitious lawyer, Harvey Specter, in the hit-series Suits. In this, he famously co-starred alongside Patrick J. Adams, Rick Hoffmann and Meghan Markle (Duchess of Sussex).

Additionally, American actor Ed Norton is also amongst the list of speakers. He is notable for his leading performance in the mega-hit 1999 drama Fight Club.

American politician Patrick J. Kennedy is also set to speak. He is a former Congressman, who served as a Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives from 1995 to 2011. He is also a leading global mental health advocate.

As well, the Union will welcome Georg Friedrich Prinz von Preussen. The German businessman is the current head of the Prussian branch of the House of Hohenzollern. This was the former imperial ruling dynasty of the German Empire and Kingdom of Prussia. He is the great-great grandson of the German state’s last emperor Wilhelm II.

These new speaker events were not previously published on the TT23 Union term card, of which highlights can be found here.

“A slap in the face to trans students”: Peter Tatchell pulls out of Union pride debate in protest

0

Peter Tatchell, well-known political activist and LGBTQ+ rights campaigner, has pulled out of tonight’s Oxford Union debate in protest against the Union’s decision to host Kathleen Stock without a trans speaker present. 

Tatchell, who as well as founding the Peter Tatchell Foundation and direct action group ‘OutRage!’ has twice attempted a citizen’s arrest of Robert Mugabe, was meant to be speaking for the proposition in the debate “This House believes that the commercialisation of Pride has done more harm than good”. 

However, Tatchell told Cherwell that he has “somewhat reluctantly” decided to withdraw as he feels it is “inappropriate” for him to speak at the Union “this week”, as he “choose[s] to stand in solidarity with the trans community”.

Tatchell told Cherwell: “I strongly disagree with the Oxford Union giving Kathleen Stock a solo platform, without having a trans speaker to counter her viewpoint. While I am all in favour of free speech, it is not free speech when trans people are denied a voice in favour of those who want to restrict their inclusion and human rights.  

“Given that trans equality is an important and topical issue, hosting a one-sided event without a pro-trans speaker is biased and unfair. It is a slap in the face to trans students and staff.”

The Union has been contacted for comment and this article will be updated to reflect their response.

Regent’s Park links trans inclusion statement to official harrassment policy

0

Regent’s Park has announced a trans inclusion statement, linking issues of trans inclusion and identification with its harassment policy. It is the first college to recognise self-identification as a “personal” belief and a protected characteristic.

Regent’s Park “condemns all forms of unlawful discrimination, victimisation, bullying, harassment and hate crime perpetrated against trans people” and has committed to fostering a safe and respectful environment. The college recognises that there are differences between assigned sex and gender identity expression and “will at no time” discriminate on this basis or during the process of gender reassignment. 

The 2010 Equalities Act already protects trans indiviudals from “discrimination (direct or indirect), victimisation, bullying or harassment”. The Act goes on to describe the protected characteristics of such a trans indiviudal as one “who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing, or has undergone a process (or part of a process) of reassigning their person sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex”.

Regent’s Park further recognises that “gender assignment” has “personal rather than exclusively medical dimensions”. Their protection is extended to those who are perceived, even incorrectly, as having a protected characteristic of gender reassignment. 

Whilst incidents will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, inappropriate behaviours towards trans people will include persistent misgendering, denying the existence of trans people, and physical violence of any kind. 

The college is also committed to fostering good relations between groups with a protected characteristic and upholding freespeech: “Lawfully expressed gender-critical beliefs must be held in balance with the dignity and respect of trans people, and with the College’s statement of commitment to trans inclusion.

“Regent’s Park College respects the right of trans people to choose whether or not to participate in discussions or debates. Regent’s Park College also respects the rights of those holding gender-critical beliefs which are to be protected, provided their expression does not constitute harassment as not respecting the rights and freedoms of others.”
Read the full policy here.

Kevin and Timmy present: Solutions to Problems

0

Editor’s note: This cartoon is not sponsored by Heinz Beanz

Record number of BME students received places in 2022 as EU and overall applications fall

0

According to Oxford’s newest admissions report, for the first time in at least five years, the overall number of applications to Oxford has decreased, while many minority groups have seen record numbers of offers.

Oxford received an all time high of 24,338 applications in 2021, and received about 500 less applications in 2022 with an overall offer rate of 15.3%. However, the offer rate can vary significantly. Overall, UK applicants are more than twice as likely than international applicants to receive an offer. Applicants for Music, the most undersubscribed course, are more than 13 times more likely to receive an offer than applicants for Mathematics and Statistics, the most oversubscribed course.

By Region

Following a 29% drop in 2021, the number of EU applicants dropped another 20% to its lowest point in at least 5 years. Meanwhile, the number of admitted non-EU international students reached record numbers, increasing by over 11%. Within international applicants, Singaporeans are more than two times as likely than Americans and nearly four times more likely than Indians to secure an offer. 

Just shy of half of UK offers were to students from London or the South East, which was proportionate to the number of applications.

By Ethnicity

BME students make up a record proportion of admitted students, reaching 27.8% compared to merely 18.3% just five years ago. The proportion of ethnic minority students in Oxford is now similar to those seen across UK universities. However, the offer rate for BME students remains almost 5 percentage points lower than for White students.

By Disability

Oxford admitted a record number of students declaring a disability in 2022, handing out 15% more offers than last year. 11.5% of offers went to students who declared a disability, though this is still lower than the UK-wide and Russell Group average. The most commonly declared disability was a learning disability, which includes dyslexia, dyspraxia and ADHD.

By School

The proportion of state school students admitted in 2022 remains essentially stable, making up 68.1% of admitted students, compared to 68.2% last year. The admissions rate for independent school applicants remains higher than for state school applicants.

Independent school students are still overrepresented at Oxford by over 50% relative to the share of students achieving AAA or better at A-level that attend an independent school. Independent school students are also overrepresented in admitted students by over 100% relative to the share of age 16+ students attending independent school.

By Course

STEM courses continue to be the most over-subscribed. The lowest offer rates were for Mathematics and Statistics (3.8%), Economics & Management (5.5%), and Computer Science (6.1%), while the highest offer rates were for Music (51.7%), Classics and Modern Languages (45.5%), and Modern Languages and Linguistics (44.3%). 

The Oxford courses that received the most applicants in the 2022 admissions cycle were PPE (1,997), Mathematics (1,883), and Medicine (1,864).

By College

Univ (8%), Magdalen (8%), and St John’s (9%) were the most oversubscribed colleges, while applicants to St Peter’s (16%), Harris Manchester (16%) and Permanent Private Halls (25%) were more than twice as likely to receive a place at their college of choice. 

The college that accepted the highest proportion of re-allocated students was Harris Manchester (65%), while far-out colleges, St Hilda’s and St Hugh’s had 53% and 49% respectively. The lowest proportions of re-allocated students were at Magdalen (6%), New (10%), and Worcester (10%).

Overall remarks

Vice Chancellor, Prof Irene Tracey, commented on the results, saying “it is encouraging to see that steady progress continues to be made to ensure that those with the highest academic potential, from all backgrounds, can realise their aspirations to study here – despite admissions continuing to be increasingly competitive.”. She added that programs will continue to be implemented to ensure that Oxford students “reflect the UK’s diversity in many respects” and “motivate bright students to realise their academic potential and aspirations” at Oxford. 

Read the full report here.

Graphics and additional reporting by Maggie Wilcox.

record number oxford admissions

Protester glues themself to the floor of the chamber during Stock’s Union address

0

Kathleen Stock’s address at the Union has attracted hundreds of protestors, both outside the Union and within the chamber. A 500-person strong “protest party” played loud music outside the Union, and a protestor glued themselves to the floor during the event in protest of the talk by the gender-critical feminist. 

Guests queued for hours to get a spot in the packed chamber, with the queue at one point stretching past the Union and St Peter’s college. Soon after the event began, a protester, who has since identified themself in a tweet as Riz Possnett, glued themself to the floor of the chamber. The event was temporarily suspended and police officers were brought in to dissolve the glue, causing a delay of around ten minutes. Protesters within the debate chamber distributed leaflets which read “No more dead trans kids.”

On Twitter, Possnett explained that they firmly believe “trans lives and rights should not be up for ‘debate’” and vowed to continue fighting for trans rights.

The protest, organised by Oxford LGBTQ Society, began at Bonn Square. The “protest party” of 500 marched to the Union, where protests continued outside the event. Loud music and chanting could be heard from inside the debate chamber and continued throughout the event. Placards from the protests read “our existence is not a debate” and “crash the Stock market.” Protesters came to show their support of trans students of Oxford and reflect trans joy. One trans student, Elliott, told Cherwell “you cannot imagine the feeling of stepping into a room and sitting next to someone who five minutes ago tweeted against your existence”.

As Stock exited the Union, she was met with chants of “Terf lies cost lives”.

This article will be updated to reflect ongoing events.