Sunday, April 27, 2025
Blog Page 1584

‘Lolz’ added to Oxford English Dictionary

0

A number of controversial new words have been added this year to Oxford Dictionaries Online, as the website’s editors try to keep the site’s database of vocabulary up to date with common usage.

These additions include ‘lolz’, which can, according to the website, either be used as a noun meaning ‘fun, laughter or amusement’ (e.g. “the image was immediately posted on Facebook, just for lolz”) or as an interjection: (“Tell him to call his wife if you see him! Lolz.”)

Other new words include ‘tweeps’, referring to Twitter followers (“he told his tweeps he was going to a Bruce Springsteen concert”). This is believed to be etymologically derived from a combination of ‘twitter’ and ‘peeps’ (the latter itself a modern abbreviation of ‘people’.)

Among the more unusual additions is ‘vajazzle’, used as a verb to mean ‘adorn the pubic area (of a woman) with crystals, glitter, or other decoration’ (e.g. “the glamorous world of fake tans and vajazzling”)

One third year classicist commented, “I think adding new words to dictionaries is a very dangerous business indeed. If we start expanding our lexicon willy-nilly, we risk diluting the etymological purity of our language.”

He continued, “Vajazzle is a particularly unwelcome addition: it is an unfortunate hybrid of the Latin-derived word ‘vagina’ (‘sheath’) and the Anglo-Saxon-derived ‘dazzle’. I would favour a purely Latin compound such as ‘vaginastellate’ (combining ‘vagina’ with ‘stellare’, to stud or bedeck with stars).

Oxord 02 Academy appeal fails

0

The O2 Academy in Cowley is appealing against Oxford City Council’s decision to deny a proposed opening hour extension. 

In June the council rejected plans to extend opening hours at the Academy. The planned extension was to include opening an hour earlier each day, opening for four extra hours on Sundays before bank holidays and until 6am on May Morning.

The plans to extend opening hours were rejected by councillors due to concerns about crime, community safety and noise. The plans prompted 46 letters of objection from local residents who feared extended drinking hours would increase anti-social behaviour.

Residents’ complaints contributed to the move of Fuzzy Ducks from the O2 to Wahoo at the beginning of this term.

Planning officers originally came out in support of extending opening hours. In a report presented to councillors they wrote, “The variation would not significantly alter the existing operating hours of this venue with the Cowley Road district centre and, in the absence of any significant objection from Thames Valley Police and licensing officers, it would be difficult to demonstrate that it would have a significant impact upon neighbouring residential properties in terms of increased noise, disturbance, and antisocial behaviour.”

At the meeting vetoing the planned extension of hours, Thames Valley Police made no objection to the plan. 

William Pimlott, a student at Wadham, commented, “As a resident of Bullingdon Road I find it outrageous that our local night life opportunities should be so limited by priggish and party-pooping residents. Already one is often forced to travel across town to inebriate oneself and enjoy loud music, and if these draconian measures are pushed any further Cowley will become a desert reminiscent of those most barren of places: Somerville and Jericho.

“My only regret with local Nightlife pursuers is their cavalier attitude to our vulnerable wheely bins which often fall prey to ‘hilarious’ pranks and other such misdemeanorariness, but I am willing to sacrifice the poor and unsuspecting wheely bins to the greater good.”

A second year Oxford Brookes student added, “Extending the opening hours won’t make the O2 more popular with students. Everyone already goes into town for the better nights at Junction and Wahoo.’

Should High Table be Abolished?

0

Yes- Sarika Sharma

At a JCR meeting at Somer-ville College, Olivia Arigho-Stiles and I proposed a motion for the abolition of High Table. While it was strongly rejected for mostly sentimental reasons, our case still stands. Many Somerville students actively voted in support of High Table, believing that it embodies respect for senior members of the college and a celebration of academic success. But this argument fails to take into account the damaging side-effects of this tradition.

In practice High Table elevates the senior members of a college above normal diners, in the spirit of the old feudal order. Society today broadly embraces the idea of egalitarianism, in that all human life is inherently of equal value, whatever class or creed. The High Table system is simply not appropriate for this day and age.

The exact set-up is different in each individual college: some, such as Brasenose, emphasise the division more strongly by providing better quality food and cutlery to those sitting at High Table. Other colleges like Somerville have a more informal atmosphere in hall: gowns are not worn, and the food is the same quality everywhere. Despite this, the literal elevation of High Table creates fundamental distinctions between diners, which is why I proposed the motion.

There is no doubting that the nature of academic institutions is hierarchical, but to have this asserted in a supposedly communal place of eating makes little sense. Where you ought to eat is irrelevant to your place in the hierarchy of academia, and hence high table is a wholly unnecessary act of veneration.

Respecting senior members of the college and celebrating academic achievement must find other, less offensive outlets, which do not place one group beneath another. To abolish High Table would be a simple change and is hardly a radical idea, but it would nonetheless show a strong commitment to inclusiveness, tolerance and other egalitarian values between those who are eating in the college community.

Anachronism is inescapable at Oxford, and while a bit of pomp seems like nice, harmless fun, it also serves to remind us of our university’s socially elitist past.

Oxford needs and wants to improve access to students coming from diverse and under-privileged backgrounds, and this involves thinking seriously about the image it projects to the wider world.

You may be so accustomed to the Oxford bubble, its culture and its traditions, that you would not sense the way in which High Table is likely to be understood by someone from outside our university culture. Guests tend to express either awe or discomfort as they look up to High Table. It gives off a sense of superiority that is very antiquated to the point of being surreal.

No- Tom Beardsworth

Ok, High Table is hierarchal and old-fashioned. And yes, it’s very pleasant to be a guest at High Table and, naturally, the exclusivity of the whole affair is slightly peeving to those who aren’t invited to join it. But once you understand that the only objection of the Somerville students who proposed the JCR motion is ‘exclusivity’, their case begins to fall apart.

Unless you’re in cahoots with the anarcho-communists, you’re not going to object to exclusivity per se. Most of us are inclined to object to any society or institution that excludes people based on race or gender (though the membership policy of the Black Police Officers Association might make you think twice on that one). But few people take issue with groups that discriminate on the basis of some form of merit. The rugby team will pick the best rugby players (alas at Brasenose, I am not among them); socially, we all court friend- ships with some people, at the exclusion of others, because we find them funny, attractive and caring. And higher education of course remains ruthlessly meritocratic, as the top universities admit only those who have jumped over the requisite intellectual hurdles.

Similarly, High Table exists to confer special privilege and status on those who in college’s judgement deserve it. No doubt that judgement may at times be dodgy at best: that the late Eric Hobsbawn, the Marxist historian and Stalin apologist, held that honour at a series of Oxbridge colleges over his long life smacks me as pretty offensive. Nor would it surprise me to learn that a fair number of High Table guests are there by virtue of being mates with the Principal – just like the pre-debate dinner at the Oxford Union is packed out with the President’s cronies dining on your dollar. To suggest that not everyone at High Table deserves to be there does not stretch the bounds of credulity. The selection process, to the extent that there is one at all, is undoubtedly rigged in favour of the elderly, the decrepit, the religious and the wealthy. But that does not mean to say that the institution of High Table is inherently odious. If I may be permitted to throw out a couple of platitudes: don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater; mend it, don’t end it.

You may not think that the current crop of suits who enjoy High Table are particularly deserving, but in that case we should change the rules about who is entitled to dine there, rather than abolishing the prac- tice altogether. If High Table is an anachronistic injustice, then so is Oxford and indeed, most of hu- man society. The Somerville motion was resoundingly crushed by their eminently sensible JCR for the obvious reason that there is such a thing as achievement. Only the envious and miserable would deprive colleges of the right to laud achievement by serving something a bit fancy for dinner.

Can you tell me where the University is?

0

It can happen to the freshest of us. The tourists catch us as we go down the street, invariably caught in one of the two principal modes of the Oxford student: pre-work crisis dread or post-crisis daze. Their requests for help come in all the varied accents of the world: the inexplicable and frankly unearned friendliness of the American or the self-effacing Easterner. Yet, however the syllables are attacked the question itself is unchanging and eternal.

My experience of this came early in the term. My own tourist was possessed of an unplaceable continental accent and enquired, ‘Excuse me?’ with a not quite Germanic precision, ‘Where is the University?’ ‘The university is everywhere’, I lamely responded, ‘on every street.’ This interpretation lends rather an unexpected glow of dignity to the Poundland outlets of Oxford or, rather more happily, the assorted kebab vans. ‘The university is more of an idea’, I tried again, but by then I had lost him.

Indeed the tourists are on to something, for the university is a curiously elusive and sometimes fragmented creature. Our first formal encounter with it comes at matriculation (a ceremony that falls after you’ve had two weeks of college undying allegiance forced on you) the Latinate ceremony of which the translation roughly goes, Senior Tutor: ‘Can these students join the university?’ Vice-Chancellor: ‘Alright, if you insist.’ It is our colleges which carefully selected us, interviewed us, and now teach us in tutorials and discipline us when we fall short. The scientists might rise for nine o’clock labs at the science centre, but a humanities student never need physically leave college during their degree. They could sleep in college accommodation, eat in hall and work in the library. Their social scene would be college bars and JCRs.

Of course the university tries to help us along our way. It lays on lectures, a curiously outmoded and heroically ineffective means of instruction. But as the weeks roll by and attendances dwindle this point of contact is lost. The other great flagship is the library system, which certainly compensates for various deficiencies in college stock. Yet surely the university is more than a million dusty tomes?

No one doubts that it is colleges which take the primary role in the life of the Oxford undergraduate. But explaining the integral yet separate status of the colleges to a tourist may well prove impossible. Indeed the entire matter has a distinctly theological air to it, with the University an immaterial union of 38-colleges-in-one. So next time you are asked, simplify as freely as a GCSE syllabus. Direct your eager tourist first to the Bodleian, and then with a quiet sigh, on to the Exam Schools.

 

New rooms for Corpus Students

0

 

Corpus Christi College has given the 
go ahead for the creation of 45 new 
student rooms in a former conference centre on Park End Street. ‘Cantay House’ will be converted into a series of 5 bedroom flat units for both 
undergraduates and graduate students. The build will be completed 
by shared kitchen and sitting room 
areas, landscaped garden areas, covered cycle storage and high levels of 
security for occupants.
Bursar John Harrison commented, 
“The design has been arrived at after consultation with SCR and MCR 
members. The project offers a significant opportunity to improve our 
accommodation stock by investing 
in an energy efficient and inherently 
sustainable build that is expected to 
incorporate CHP generation and very 
high levels of sound and energy insulation. Once complete, this project 
will create the space needed to continue the process of improvement 
across the remainder of our accommodation.”
The site’s recent history had been 
controversial. Cantay Investments, 
the original owners of the Cantay 
House property, had wanted to convert the building into nine residential flats. However, the change 
of plans came about over 
summer when Oxford City 
Council rejected them amid 
claims that the company was 
keeping the number of flats 
low  to avoid contribution 
towards a scheme of 
affordable housing.
Tony Nolan, of Cantay Investments, 
said, “We didn’t appeal the decision 
because on balance we didn’t want to 
hang around and wait. When we designed the scheme we felt we wanted 
to develop high-quality housing in 
the city centre. We submitted a viability report suggesting the contribution could not be afforded so we 
declined to make an offer.”
Cantay Investments had to deal 
with issues of social housing. Policy 
dictates that constructions involving 
10 or more properties have to ensure 
that half of the available units are 
designated as social housing. Corpus 
Christi as student accommodation is 
exempt from these regulations and 
permission was granted.
Pete Johnstone, a second year 
medic, commented, “It is the perfect location for the station and the 
clubs. I hope they’re not going to give 
it to the graduates.” Rosie Oxbury, 
another Corpus student, said, “We 
don’t need housing for another 45 
people. This seems like a way for college to sell off the 
small student 
houses.

Corpus Christi College has given the go ahead for the creation of 45 new student rooms in a former conference centre on Park End Street.

‘Cantay House’ will be converted into a series of 5 bedroom flat units for both undergraduates and graduate students. The build will be completed by shared kitchen and sitting room areas, landscaped garden areas, covered cycle storage and high levels of security for occupants.

Bursar John Harrison commented, “The design has been arrived at after consultation with SCR and MCR members. The project offers a significant opportunity to improve our accommodation stock by investing in an energy efficient and inherently sustainable build that is expected to incorporate CHP generation and very high levels of sound and energy insulation. Once complete, this project will create the space needed to continue the process of improvement across the remainder of our accommodation.”

The site’s recent history had been controversial. Cantay Investments, the original owners of the Cantay House property, had wanted to convert the building into nine residential flats. However, the change of plans came about over summer when Oxford City Council rejected them amid claims that the company was keeping the number of flats low  to avoid contribution towards a scheme of affordable housing.

Tony Nolan, of Cantay Investments, said, “We didn’t appeal the decision because on balance we didn’t want to hang around and wait. When we designed the scheme we felt we wanted to develop high-quality housing in the city centre. We submitted a viability report suggesting the contribution could not be afforded so we declined to make an offer.”

Cantay Investments had to deal with issues of social housing. Policy dictates that constructions involving 10 or more properties have to ensure that half of the available units are designated as social housing. Corpus Christi as student accommodation is exempt from these regulations and permission was granted.Pete Johnstone, a second year medic, commented, “It is the perfect location for the station and the clubs. I hope they’re not going to give it to the graduates.” Rosie Oxbury, another Corpus student, said, “We don’t need housing for another 45 people. This seems like a way for college to sell off the small student houses.

St Hugh’s to move location to Christ Church Meadow

0

St Hugh’s students have voted almost unanimously to move their college to  Christ Church Meadow.

St Hugh’s students have voted almost 
unanimously to move their college to  
Christ Church Meadow.
A motion proposed at Sunday 
evening’s JCR meeting by first year 
Alexander Kirri noted that “The only 
feature of College which holds it back 
is its location” and claimed that “The 
College simply had no choice but to 
move, considering the current damage inflicted by distance jokes.”
Students at the college, situated 
a mile beyond the city centre, voted 
overwhelmingly in favour of the 
move, with only one student voting 
against, voicing concerns about the 
welfare of the cows currently residing in Christ Church Meadow. 
Kirri explained that the cows could 
live under the raised platform on 
which the college would be placed. 
Other students suggested that the 
cows could be relocated to the college’s original site on St Margaret’s 
Road.
The other worry students expressed was the distance of the new 
site from Ali’s kebab van on Woodstock Road. This was resolved by a decision to relocate Ali to a houseboat 
on the Isis.
French student Kirri told Cherwell, “I must say that I am incredibly pleased that my Christ Church 
Meadow renovation plans have been 
passed. The Meadow has blighted 
the Oxford landscape for nearly 500 
years now, so I figured that it was 
about time that the luscious grounds 
of St Hugh’s replaced it as a spectacle 
for all to marvel at.”
The motion was part of St Hugh’s 
annual “joke motions” meeting, 
which marks the changeover in JCR 
committees. Other motions passed 
included mandating two members 
of the JCR to participate in a fist fight 
“until exhaustion or death” and making the outgoing JCR Vice-President 
don glittery hot pants and wear a 
rainbow flag as a cape to a soundtrack 
of various “gay anthems”, including 
Lady Gaga’s ‘Born This Way.’
Though various punishments 
should the challenges not be completed were mooted at the meeting, 
it is understood that there is no obligation for students to fulfil the terms 
of the meeting’s motions.

A motion proposed at Sunday evening’s JCR meeting by first year Alexander Kirri noted that “The only feature of College which holds it back is its location” and claimed that “The College simply had no choice but to move, considering the current damage inflicted by distance jokes.”

Students at the college, situated a mile beyond the city centre, voted overwhelmingly in favour of the move, with only one student voting against, voicing concerns about the welfare of the cows currently residing in Christ Church Meadow. 

Kirri explained that the cows could live under the raised platform on which the college would be placed. Other students suggested that the cows could be relocated to the college’s original site on St Margaret’s Road.

The other worry students expressed was the distance of the new site from Ali’s kebab van on Woodstock Road. This was resolved by a decision to relocate Ali to a houseboat on the Isis.

French student Kirri told Cherwell, “I must say that I am incredibly pleased that my Christ Church Meadow renovation plans have been passed. The Meadow has blighted the Oxford landscape for nearly 500 years now, so I figured that it was about time that the luscious grounds of St Hugh’s replaced it as a spectacle for all to marvel at.”

The motion was part of St Hugh’s annual “joke motions” meeting, which marks the changeover in JCR committees. Other motions passed included mandating two members of the JCR to participate in a fist fight “until exhaustion or death” and making the outgoing JCR Vice-President don glittery hot pants and wear a rainbow flag as a cape to a soundtrack of various “gay anthems”, including Lady Gaga’s ‘Born This Way.’

Though various punishments should the challenges not be completed were mooted at the meeting, it is understood that there is no obligation for students to fulfil the terms of the meeting’s motions.

Private Schools ‘demonised’ by politicians

0
A leading independent school headmaster 
claims that independent schools are unfairly 
“demonised.”
In an article in the Telegraph on Saturday 
17th November, Dr. Christopher Ray, Chairman of the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ 
Conference (HMC), an association of mostly 
British, but also a number of international independent schools, argued that HMC schools 
“are the envy of the educational world, even 
though we are demonised by some at home.”
In a piece that covered some of the most high 
profile contemporary educational debates, Dr. 
Ray, who is also High Master of Manchester 
Grammar School, claimed that demand for independent schools is so intense as, under Tony 
Blair, state education had become “an abject 
mess, mess, mess.” 
As a result of independent schools’ “success”, 
including the fact that, “one in five of those attending Britain’s top 10 universities come from 
Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference 
(HMC) schools”, it is unsurprising, he argued, 
that 57% of parents “would send their children 
to an independent school if they had the financial means to do so.”
Some privately educated students do not 
agree with Dr Ray on the issue of independent schools being “demonised”. One student, 
who studied at Manchester Grammar School, 
claimed, “I wouldn’t say independent schools 
were demonised at all. But perhaps this is the 
perception people have, given that the media 
is fixated on discussing the ratio of people who 
get in the best of the Russell Group unis.” 
He continued, “Less attention is paid to the 
excellent state schools, with more emphasis 
placed on the underperforming ones.”
Dr. Ray argued that one of the reasons HMC 
schools do not deserve their current image is 
due to the “excellent links” they have to state 
schools and the “opportunities they provide” 
for those from lesser financial backgrounds. 
One former Eton student supported such a 
view, saying, “The system isn’t perfect but most 
[independent] schools recognise this; providing outreach programs and bursaries to alleviate the image of privilege. As long as they exist 
they will be classed as agents to the detriment 
of social mobility, but through bursaries (Eton 
has about 50% people on them) prospective pupils can be presented opportunities academies 
would be hard pressed to match.”
An Oxford University spokesperson claimed, 
“Oxford University does not take the type or 
category of school that an applicant went to 
into account, whether state, independent or 
academy. Selection is based purely on academic ability and potential.”
However, the spokesperson added that Oxford does take contextual information into account in inviting ‘extra’ students to interview. 
“A ‘flagging’ system flags things like low school 
performance, deprived postcode, or being 
in care. If someone is flagged in several areas 
they will be invited to interview to allow them 
the extra opportunity to show their potential 
there (this only affects quite a small number of 
applicants). The flags play no part in the final 
d

A leading independent school headmaster claims that independent schools are unfairly “demonised.”

In an article in the Telegraph on Saturday 17th November, Dr. Christopher Ray, Chairman of the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference (HMC), an association of mostly British, but also a number of international independent schools, argued that HMC schools “are the envy of the educational world, even though we are demonised by some at home.”

In a piece that covered some of the most high profile contemporary educational debates, Dr. Ray, who is also High Master of Manchester Grammar School, claimed that demand for independent schools is so intense as, under Tony Blair, state education had become “an abject mess, mess, mess.” As a result of independent schools’ “success”, including the fact that, “one in five of those attending Britain’s top 10 universities come from Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference (HMC) schools”, it is unsurprising, he argued, that 57% of parents “would send their children to an independent school if they had the financial means to do so.”

Some privately educated students do not agree with Dr Ray on the issue of independent schools being “demonised”. One student, who studied at Manchester Grammar School, claimed, “I wouldn’t say independent schools were demonised at all. But perhaps this is the perception people have, given that the media is fixated on discussing the ratio of people who get in the best of the Russell Group unis.” He continued, “Less attention is paid to the excellent state schools, with more emphasis placed on the underperforming ones.”

Dr. Ray argued that one of the reasons HMC schools do not deserve their current image is due to the “excellent links” they have to state schools and the “opportunities they provide” for those from lesser financial backgrounds. One former Eton student supported such a view, saying, “The system isn’t perfect but most [independent] schools recognise this; providing outreach programs and bursaries to alleviate the image of privilege. As long as they exist they will be classed as agents to the detriment of social mobility, but through bursaries (Eton has about 50% people on them) prospective pupils can be presented opportunities academies would be hard pressed to match.”

An Oxford University spokesperson claimed, “Oxford University does not take the type or category of school that an applicant went to into account, whether state, independent or academy. Selection is based purely on academic ability and potential.”

However, the spokesperson added that Oxford does take contextual information into account in inviting ‘extra’ students to interview. They contined, “A ‘flagging’ system flags things like low school performance, deprived postcode, or being in care. If someone is flagged in several areas they will be invited to interview to allow them the extra opportunity to show their potential there (this only affects quite a small number of applicants). The flags play no part in the final decision to make an offer.’

Preview: Henry VI

0

In the lead up to the break out of the Wars of the Roses, the boy king Henry VI sits upon the thrown in a seething hyper-masculine environment where the governing principle is hunger for power. The male rivals manoeuvre their way closer and closer to the throne of a man who is neither very competent nor very desirous of his kingship. Swaggering egos of two dynasties turn to violence to ensure the protection of their interests in a markedly medieval, brutal and divided patriarchy. This is the history and the drift of Shakespeare’s text; this version of the play makes a controversial transformation, however, effecting a universal gender change, such that patriarchy is translated into matriarchy. The implications are fascinatingly explored in this new production.

The director has condensed the Henry VI trilogy into a one two hour performance with a re-proportioning of the various plot lines to give emphasis to the key gender concept. Of course, this concept could come across as a little tired and predictable- the whole gender stereotypes thing being something of a modern day obsession- however, the cast on the whole treads on the favourable side of the line between truthful reflection of the other gender and cliché. I was engaged by the subtle observation of the gesture and movement, which promises a multi-layered performance that brings often automatic mannerisms or the very basics of posture into the conscious sphere. Combining the Shakespearean story, which faces off against each other dangerously ambitious macho personalities, with a gender-swapping exercise has the audience actively considering the way one gender perceives and presents itself to the other. The world of the play gently disorientates a standard notion of the relations in politics and romance, and achieves this especially by careful thought given to the physical hierarchy on stage, to lend emphasis to a particular stage presence and subdue others.

The vision for the staging is distinctly pared down. A number of stone-coloured blocks will operate as ramparts, a tomb and platform for both the throne and the bonfire of Joan of Arc’s execution. Black costume with character name and dynasty affiliation emblazoned on will bring a Brechtian note and ensure concentration is firmly set on the power dynamics.

As already suggested, the acting was of a solid standard. Speech was naturalistic and conveyed appropriately domineering and manipulative attributes, with care given to pitch register for gender representation. With a little more detail to the psychology behind character (which is not an easy task when coupled with the gender-based challenges) and faster picking up of cues, both of which will no doubt develop as the rehearsal process reaches its final phase, I’m sure that this will be a polished and thought-provoking piece, well worth seeing.

Rowing suspended with multiple collisions

0

Although Wednesday morning’s calm weather had allowed the crews to begin racing at midday, twenty minutes later conditions had deteriorated to such an extent that racing was cancelled.

The Somerville Novices Crew A got the bow of their boat wedged between a moored Salters Steamer and a mooring post while turning their boat around on wednesday morning. John Harfield, a rower from St John’s, saw the Somerville Women’s crew in difficulty and stopped to help them.

He told Cherwell “I could see Somerville were in trouble with the bow wedged, I got them to get a marshall to get the safety launch. OURC wanted to get the girls onto the boat and asked if I could get there, so I stepped into the river then climbed up the steamer. From then it was just a case of getting the 8 girls and their cox up onto the steamer so they could be taken by launch back to dry land. They were clearly all cold and in shock so I tried to get them clothes from the bank.”

All the rowers were checked by Epione Medical Services and no one was injured. Rumours that a boat had capsized were found to be false.

Saibh Finlayson, rowing for a Balliol crew, told the Cherwell that they had sat in the “pouring rain” for half an hour waiting to race before the regatta was cancelled. She also reported that “some people were saying the river should never have been green-flagged at all” and that the “current was really strong.”

Alex Chajecki, the Regatta Captain for the 2012 competition, told the Cherwell that “At 12pm the crews were ready to start, and the conditions were fairly calm, so it was deemed entirely safe. Over the next twenty minutes things changed rapidly, with increasing winds and significant increase in stream. The decision was made to hold the next division immediately. We then confirmed with the lock and the Environment Agency that conditions were looking to continue to deteriorate, so the rest of the day was cancelled.”

The Regatta was also cancelled on Thursday, with the environment agency issuing warnings of either ‘Caution strong stream’ or ‘Caution stream increasing’ on most of the locks around Oxford.

Somerville College Boat Club weren’t the only club to experience a collision. Balliol Women’s Captain Kateryna Frolova told Cherwell that, there was a “huge hole in the stern of the boat” from a collision with a Jesus College crew whilst waiting on the river.

Despite the accidents, Ian Maconnachie, the Sabbatical Officer for Rowing, defended the decision to continue with racing. He claimed, “The situation was closely monitored this term as to whether crews were experienced enough to race in Christ Church Regatta. Many of the novice crews had raced in the Nephthys Regatta last weekend and in the Isis Winter League in the weekend before that, without any accidents.”

Maconnachie further commented, “There is obviously a marginally higher level of risk due to less experience, but when marshalled and organised safely, there is no reason for an event like Christ Church Regatta to be unsafe.” Both the Somerville accident and the Balliol collision happened after the races had been suspended.

This is not the first time that the Christ Church Regatta has been suspended. Rob Wadsworth, a rower at Balliol College, commented that indivdual days of the Regatta were “quite often” suspended but also agreed with the safety officials’ decision as ‘if it’s really wet and there’s a strong steam, it’s not safe to row.”

Anthony Stansfeld elected PCC

0

The turnout rate in the election was lower than that of the OUSU election last week, as just 10.9% of Oxford residents voted in the PCC election last week, compared to 16% at the OUSU elections.

Tim Starkey, the Labour candidate, lost in the second round of voting as no candidates achieved 50% of first round votes, told Cherwell, “The abysmal turnout raises serious questions about the way the election has been organised and the role itself. One of Anthony Stansfeld’s first tasks will be to engage with all the communities across Thames Valley, including in urban areas where very few people voted for him, and including the many people who are unsure about what the PCC role means. I wish him well.”

Stansfeld outlined his aims for improving policing in Thames Valley, saying, “I aim to reduce those crimes that are of the most concern to communities, and catch those committing them.”

He claimed that his victory was due to the fact that he was “the most experienced candidate.” He added, “I also have been on the Police Authority, and for the last 18 months had responsibility for Performance for Thames Police. During this period we were the most improved police force in England. I know how to run things and control large budgets.”

Several candidates criticised the low turnout. “Turnout was not satisfactory,” Stansfeld claimed, before adding, “though over 94,000 voted for me, and a large number did not vote against me!” Barry Cooper, the UKIP candidate, claimed turnout was “appalling” and blamed “the government.”

“If the new PCC does his job properly and embraces the populist, democratic elements of the role, a mandate will evolve over time. If he doesn’t, then this will have been a wasted chance for some real democracy to enter at least one facet of how we are governed.”