Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Blog Page 1779

The pen is mightier than the ball

0

Saturday afternoon, 3pm. Different matches, different pundits, different squads. But one thing stays the same: the famous, overused, and often nonsensical footballing clichés that tumble out of mouths TV screens and radio stations before they can be stopped.

Saturday afternoon, 3pm. Different matches, different pundits, different squads. But one thing stays the same: the famous, overused, and often nonsensical footballing clichés that tumble out of mouths TV screens and radio stations before they can be stopped. “Football is a game of two halves” (can anyone remember the last time it wasn’t?) and “we’ve just got to take it one game at a time” (probably a good idea actually) are just two from an endless list. 
More often than not, you’ll hear a pre-match interview with a manager offering the following pearls of wisdom: “Today we’ve got to go out there and show them what we’ve got. Every game is a cup final because there are no easy games in football and I want to see each player give 110%. Whoever scores first will hold the advantage.” 
Talk about stating the bleeding obvious. After the match you’re more likely to hear something along the lines of: “At the end of the day, the other team wanted it more. We scored too early and we needed to put the game out of reach but we didn’t, were at sixes and sevens for the rest of the match. One team had to lose and today it was us.” Managerial expression is so idiomatic that it begins to lose all meaning.
Meanwhile, some of the most common clichés come during the game itself, such as “it’s end to end stuff”, “this game needs a goal”, “for a big lad he’s good with his feet”, “bring on some fresh legs” and “he went down far too easily.” And just sometimes these begin to grate.
Wouldn’t we miss them if they suddenly disappeared though? You can shout as much as you want at Motty for providing us with endless obscure statistics, at Jamie Redknapp describing everything as “t’rrific” and Andy Gray’s shriek of “take a bow, son”, but I think we’d all agree that football commentary just would not be the same without these phrases. 
“At the end of the day”, they’re “a great advert for the beautiful game”. Football is not just a game of two halves, it’s a game of many clichés.

“Football is a game of two halves” (can anyone remember the last time it wasn’t?) and “we’ve just got to take it one game at a time” (probably a good idea actually) are just two from an endless list. More often than not, you’ll hear a pre-match interview with a manager offering the following pearls of wisdom: “Today we’ve got to go out there and show them what we’ve got. Every game is a cup final because there are no easy games in football and I want to see each player give 110%. Whoever scores first will hold the advantage.” 

Talk about stating the bleeding obvious. After the match you’re more likely to hear something along the lines of: “At the end of the day, the other team wanted it more. We scored too early and we needed to put the game out of reach but we didn’t, were at sixes and sevens for the rest of the match. One team had to lose and today it was us.” Managerial expression is so idiomatic that it begins to lose all meaning.

Meanwhile, some of the most common clichés come during the game itself, such as “it’s end to end stuff”, “this game needs a goal”, “for a big lad he’s good with his feet”, “bring on some fresh legs” and “he went down far too easily.” And just sometimes these begin to grate.

Wouldn’t we miss them if they suddenly disappeared though? You can shout as much as you want at Motty for providing us with endless obscure statistics, at Jamie Redknapp describing everything as “t’rrific” and Andy Gray’s shriek of “take a bow, son”, but I think we’d all agree that football commentary just would not be the same without these phrases.

“At the end of the day”, they’re “a great advert for the beautiful game”. Football is not just a game of two halves, it’s a game of many clichés.

Review: Björk – Biophilia

0

In the critical attention surrounding Björk’s eighth album, Biophilia, there has been a disturbing trend towards accusing the Icelandic maverick of multidisciplinary overreach. Biophilia is certainly an ambitious project, extending beyond the album to encompass live shows, educational workshops and a suite of apps that somehow manages to incorporate the voice of David Attenborough and essays from the musicologist Nicola Dibben. But it would be a mistake to underestimate Björk’s latest creation.

Since 1993’s Debut, Björk has reveled in characterizing herself outside of convention. This is an artist who is quite simply peerless in her perpetual drive to push forwards the language of contemporary pop music. While 2001’s introverted Vespertine focused on the purely acoustic construction of a Nordic soundscape, the audiovisual imagination of Biophilia delights in subverting this. Biophilia’s apps, each focusing on explaining and playing around a specific musical idea such as counterpoint and tempo, capture the spirit which first drew me to Björk’s music: a propensity for the unpredictable without ever alienating her audience.

The Biophilia song cycle itself has no pretensions to covering new musical ground, and instead returns to Björk’s earlier explorations of space and timbral parameters. Björk’s slightly over-miked voice remains true to the breathy aesthetic of the post-Vespertine era. The lilting melody of ‘Virus’, softly spoken against chiming clusters, is a wonder to behold. ‘I knock on your skin and I am in’, she delicately articulates. Even the lyrics seem to reference the eroticised world of Vespertine and Medúlla.

Parts of the album celebrate Björk’s typical brand of brash experimentalism. The gamaleste, a specially developed gamelan-celeste hybrid, weaves its way through ‘Crystalline’ before the song disintegrates in a burst of Squarepusher-esque cacophony. But the most striking moments reveal themselves in Biophilia’s more intimately shaped pieces. The uneven harmonies set up by the pipe organ and choir of ‘Dark Matter’, through to the sparse setting of Björk’s vocals and pendulum harp in the closing ‘Solstice’ make for deeply affecting music. Biophilia is full of the beauty of a true original.

Tales from the deep: Cherwell Sport tries out Octopush

0

My immediate thought when told I would be giving Octopush a go was ‘eh?’, which was then swiftly followed by ‘what, so they thought of a pun and then created a sport around it?’ As it turns out, I wasn’t far off, but as I was to discover that there is a lot more to the beast than mere wordplay.

My immediate thought when told I would be giving Octopush a go was ‘eh?’, which was then swiftly followed by ‘what, so they thought of a pun and then created a sport around it?’ As it turns out, I wasn’t far off, but as I was to discover that there is a lot more to the beast than mere wordplay.
Octopush was created in 1954 by a bunch of Southsea snorkelers who wanted something to do during the long winter months when the channel itself was much too chilly to dare venture into. It also goes by the slightly less exciting name of Underwater Hockey, and that is perhaps the best way to describe it – teams of six (eight when founded, hence the name) compete to push a weighted puck along the floor of the pool with their sticks, and into the opposition’s goal.
Now, I am to swimming what Emile Heskey is to the English football team; loads of effort, well-meaning, but about as effective as a chocolate teapot. Hence, I donned the mandatory mask and snorkel (required so  that you can see what’s happening on the pool floor at all times) with slight trepidation, lest I end up drowning, or worse, embarrassing myself.
We were (both literally and metaphorically) thrown in at the deep end. A brief demo of how to clear your snorkel and avoid a watery grave, some passing practice on the bottom of the pool, and next thing I knew I was in a five-on-five game being told I was left attack. Someone shouted ‘go’, everyone hared it to the puck in the centre of the pool, members of both teams dived down to try and manoeuvre the puck towards the opposition’s goal, and I very quietly swallowed a lot of water. It was very exciting, but by the time someone finally scored a goal, I had no real clue what was going on, and I imagine I wasn’t alone.
It’s nowhere near as violent as water polo, which as far as I can gather involves fourteen crazed individuals scrapping around a pool until someone loses a testicle, but due to the three-dimensional nature of play things can get quite chaotic, the only lull coming when everyone has to come up for air at the same time. In fact, despite the sometimes physical nature, it is actually a unisex sport, as I was informed that the men’s greater speed and strength is countered by women being more able to change direction quickly. What really surprised me is how tiring it was. You’re constantly gasping for breath, all the while trying to work out where the puck’s going next and plan your movements accordingly.
Obviously, as it was being played by beginners, the quality must have been slightly lacking, and I am intrigued to think what a match being played by experienced players, and especially those capable of holding their breath for more than the four seconds I could, would be like. I imagine there would be much more structure, with genuine passing play and patterns, and the communication would be a lot better due to familiarity with your team mates and their styles, strengths and weaknesses.
Would I try it again? No, my deficiencies with snorkel management came to the fore a bit too much, but I can definitely see the allure and I am glad to have had a go. So if you’re a keen snorkeler looking to keep yourself amused, fancy something totally different or are even just a massive fan of pun-based sports, I’d say give it a go. You never know until you try.

Octopush was created in 1954 by a bunch of Southsea snorkelers who wanted something to do during the long winter months when the channel itself was much too chilly to dare venture into. It also goes by the slightly less exciting name of Underwater Hockey, and that is perhaps the best way to describe it – teams of six (eight when founded, hence the name) compete to push a weighted puck along the floor of the pool with their sticks, and into the opposition’s goal.

Now, I am to swimming what Emile Heskey is to the English football team; loads of effort, well-meaning, but about as effective as a chocolate teapot. Hence, I donned the mandatory mask and snorkel (required so  that you can see what’s happening on the pool floor at all times) with slight trepidation, lest I end up drowning, or worse, embarrassing myself.

We were (both literally and metaphorically) thrown in at the deep end. A brief demo of how to clear your snorkel and avoid a watery grave, some passing practice on the bottom of the pool, and next thing I knew I was in a five-on-five game being told I was left attack. Someone shouted ‘go’, everyone hared it to the puck in the centre of the pool, members of both teams dived down to try and manoeuvre the puck towards the opposition’s goal, and I very quietly swallowed a lot of water. It was very exciting, but by the time someone finally scored a goal, I had no real clue what was going on, and I imagine I wasn’t alone.

It’s nowhere near as violent as water polo, which as far as I can gather involves fourteen crazed individuals scrapping around a pool until someone loses a testicle, but due to the three-dimensional nature of play things can get quite chaotic, the only lull coming when everyone has to come up for air at the same time. In fact, despite the sometimes physical nature, it is actually a unisex sport, as I was informed that the men’s greater speed and strength is countered by women being more able to change direction quickly. What really surprised me is how tiring it was. You’re constantly gasping for breath, all the while trying to work out where the puck’s going next and plan your movements accordingly.

Obviously, as it was being played by beginners, the quality must have been slightly lacking, and I am intrigued to think what a match being played by experienced players, and especially those capable of holding their breath for more than the four seconds I could, would be like. I imagine there would be much more structure, with genuine passing play and patterns, and the communication would be a lot better due to familiarity with your team mates and their styles, strengths and weaknesses.

Would I try it again? No, my deficiencies with snorkel management came to the fore a bit too much, but I can definitely see the allure and I am glad to have had a go. So if you’re a keen snorkeler looking to keep yourself amused, fancy something totally different or are even just a massive fan of pun-based sports, I’d say give it a go. You never know until you try.

Blessing Force: assemble and unite!

0

Essentially it’s a collection of friends, mainly musicians and artists, who have all started up new projects at a similar time,’ Kit of Trophy Wife tells me, explaining the concept behind Blessing Force, the collective which has been operating in Oxford for just over a year. At this summer’s Field Day festival in London I caught up with two of the collective’s leading lights, the three piece Trophy Wife and Hugo Manuel, whose solo work operates under the moniker Chad Valley. Kit goes on, ‘We like the idea that when someone checks out our band they’ll then directly go and check out another band or artist from Blessing Force.’

Not everyone has been so enthusiastic, though, and the collective has attracted criticism from both within Oxford and further afield. Locally based rapper Asher Dust has made his feelings clear on his track ‘Force The Blessing’. ‘He raps about how we’re really middle class, which is true, and we’re white, which is true, and we’re racist because there are no black people in Blessing Force,’ Hugo explains, evidently perplexed by what he sees as the rapper’s warped logic. ‘It’s really insulting.’ Such misinformed and downright vicious attacks on the group seem only to have strengthened the loyalty of its artists however, and both Trophy Wife and Chad Valley describe Blessing Force as something they are ‘proud to be part of’.

Hugo is much less enthusiastic about the other scene that he has found his Chad Valley project bundled into: chillwave. ‘It’s really enclosed, restrictive,’ he says, expressing his desire to move away from the label. ‘I’m focusing on getting my production much more slick and classic and I’m listening to a lot of records from the 70s. I don’t want to be really influenced by what’s going on around me.’ Although describing himself as ‘flattered’ by the countless comparisons to Washed Out, it is obvious that Hugo has found himself somewhat exasperated in his attempts to forge a unique musical identity for Chad Valley.

Aside from his solo work, Hugo’s other involvements include the four piece Jonquil, whose take on sunny afro-pop has seen them develop into one of the most exciting bands working in Oxford today. Hugo tells me about their new album, set for release early next year. ‘We’ve moved away from the tropical thing, I was listening to loads of African guitar music but now it’s more straight ahead pop songs. There’s a lot of Fleetwood Mac in there.’

Also cropping up in conversation with Trophy Wife, Fleetwood Mac were cited by the band as an influence on their upcoming EP, Bruxism, the inaugural release on Blessing Force’s new record label. ‘We’ve pushed ourselves in a new direction,’ Jody explains, ‘the idea was to expand our sound a bit.’ The band assures me, however, that their core sound of ‘funky bass lines, slapping beats’ juxtaposed with Jodbry’s fragile vocals will remain unchanged.

After animated talk of new projects in the works, our conversations end on a more poignant note as we turn towards the subject of Oxford’s Truck Festival, which was liquidated in August. ‘It’s a real shame. I’ve been going there since I was about 13,’ Hugo tells me, visibly saddened by the news. Trophy Wife react similarly but are able to introduce some degree of optimism as Kit laughs, ‘It just leaves it open for Andrew Mears [formerly of Youthmovies and lynchpin of Blessing Force] doesn’t it? There’s talk of a Blessing Force festival starting up.’ As our conversation quickly turns to ‘just having a bonfire in a field and getting fucked’, it becomes less certain whether or not this is a serious suggestion. Either way, with Blessing Force around, Oxford’s music scene is looking as healthy as ever.

Hockey Blues fall to Exeter

0

Oxford Men’s hockey team kicked off their season on Wednesday in the hardest possible fashion. Their opening BUCS game of the year was against an Exeter first side that won the championship last year and are currently high-flying in the National Hockey Premier League.

Oxford Men’s hockey team kicked off their season on Wednesday in the hardest possible fashion. Their opening BUCS game of the year was against an Exeter first side that won the championship last year and are currently high-flying in the National Hockey Premier League. 
A brief discussion with the capacity crowd informed me just how unfancied Oxford were. This contest was the equivalent of the Blues football team playing the Blackburn Rovers first team, and damage limitation seemed to be on the agenda. They were not wrong; it was hard, it was fast paced, and it was autumnal. It was a fixture that required Herculean effort, from which the Blues have many positives to draw.
Although the 6-1 defeat may seem like a crushing one in terms of scoreline, what will live longest in the memory to those watching is not the excellence of the Exeter outfield, rather the string of top class short corner saves made by the Exeter goalkeeper in the second half. He acrobatically kept Oxford from narrowing the gap during their periods of ascendancy, preventing them from making the scoreline more respectable.
Iffley Astroturf was bathed in both natural sunlight and the glare of its floodlights as I approached. Two things seemed apparent: firstly a blatent lack of concern for energy consumption, but more importantly in the context of the game was the superior intensity of the Exeter side, who were playing in green. Despite the din of the jet washers and the metronomic tick-tock of hockey balls they seemed unbelievable focussed, responding militarily to the orders barked out by their weather-beaten South African coach.
He was a terrifying man who led them from the front in terms of focus. As I surreptitiously listened to their pre-game talk it seemed he was a psychologist too, insisting that Exeter “could only beat themselves”. His side responded with a pre-game roar that comfortably eclipsed the meeker Oxford equivalent. Exeter had already completed nine weeks of preseason, my friend explained to me as I bottled approaching the Exeter coach myself. They were already well into their season, whereas Oxford were just warming up. 
This was not so apparent in the opening exchanges. As they followed the footsteps of their female colleagues, who had suffered a 4-0 defeat earlier in the day, the Oxford men battled hard during the opening exchanges. The opening 15 minutes were scrappy and disjointed, with no side able to build any passing play. Barring a couple of goalmouth scrambles excitement was at a premium, and evidently this was to the frustration of the Oxford coach John Shaw who sought to play a short possession game. He frustratedly exclaimed “are you joking?” as yet another long pass went amiss.
Shaw paced his touchline in a manner reminiscent of Jose Mourinho in his prime, and like the Portuguese football manager he had words of polite criticism for the match officials. His mood did not improve as the deadlock was broken by a mazy Exeter dribble and slotted finish. Before Oxford knew what had hit them they were 2-0 down after another attacking move. Only twenty minutes had elapsed, and before they knew it the deficit was at two goals.
A third was conceded soon before half time as an Exeter attacker found a yard of space before unleashing a rocket of a shot into the top corner. It was a goal of pure class to end the first 35 minutes of the contest and Oxford

A brief discussion with the capacity crowd informed me just how unfancied Oxford were. This contest was the equivalent of the Blues football team playing the Blackburn Rovers first team, and damage limitation seemed to be on the agenda.

They were not wrong; it was hard, it was fast paced, and it was autumnal. It was a fixture that required Herculean effort, from which the Blues have many positives to draw. Although the 6-1 defeat may seem like a crushing one in terms of scoreline, what will live longest in the memory to those watching is not the excellence of the Exeter outfield, rather the string of top class short corner saves made by the Exeter goalkeeper in the second half. He acrobatically kept Oxford from narrowing the gap during their periods of ascendancy, preventing them from making the scoreline more respectable.

Iffley Astroturf was bathed in both natural sunlight and the glare of its floodlights as I approached. Two things seemed apparent: firstly a blatant lack of concern for energy consumption, but more importantly in the context of the game was the superior intensity of the Exeter side, who were playing in green.

Despite the din of the jet washers and the metronomic tick-tock of hockey balls they seemed unbelievable focussed, responding militarily to the orders barked out by their weather-beaten South African coach. He was a terrifying man who led them from the front in terms of focus. As I surreptitiously listened to their pre-game talk it seemed he was a psychologist too, insisting that Exeter “could only beat themselves”. His side responded with a pre-game roar that comfortably eclipsed the meeker Oxford equivalent.

Exeter had already completed nine weeks of preseason, my friend explained to me as I bottled approaching the Exeter coach myself. They were already well into their season, whereas Oxford were just warming up. This was not so apparent in the opening exchanges. As they followed the footsteps of their female colleagues, who had suffered a 4-0 defeat earlier in the day, the Oxford men battled hard during the opening exchanges. The opening 15 minutes were scrappy and disjointed, with no side able to build any passing play. Barring a couple of goalmouth scrambles excitement was at a premium, and evidently this was to the frustration of the Oxford coach John Shaw who sought to play a short possession game.

He frustratedly exclaimed “are you joking?” as yet another long pass went amiss. Shaw paced his touchline in a manner reminiscent of Jose Mourinho in his prime, and like the Portuguese football manager he had words of polite criticism for the match officials. His mood did not improve as the deadlock was broken by a mazy Exeter dribble and slotted finish. Before Oxford knew what had hit them they were 2-0 down after another attacking move. Only twenty minutes had elapsed, and before they knew it the deficit was at two goals.

A third was conceded soon before half time as an Exeter attacker found a yard of space before unleashing a rocket of a shot into the top corner. It was a goal of pure class to end the first 35 minutes of the contest and Oxfordlooked like they would have their work cut out to maintain respectibility in the second period.

The biggest complaint for Exeter at this point was their lack of half time refreshments and the jog to the team huddle was the greatest exertion of the Exeter keeper at this point. This was to change in the second half. After several sustained periods of pressure from the Oxford offense the Exeter side began to concede short corner after short corner; five in total.

At this point however, Exeter and England under 21 Goalkeeper Chris Rea came into his own, going through the full repertoire of diving stops as he kept these out in order to keep a clean sheet. Each save seemed to surpass the previous one, with the fifth defying belief as he got the edge of his stick to a flick that seemed destined for the glory of the top corner.

Oxford did manage a consolation goal towards the end of the second half, coming from a well worked move down the right, that Stobbart proded home from close range. The biggest cheer of the day however, was saved for the Oxford fresher goalkeeper, who successfully kept out a penalty flick low to his right.

Despite having a man down at this point for an intentional foot offense, Exeter pressed on, scoring the fourth, fifth and sixth goals. Although Oxford will be disappointed by the scoreline there is much encourage to be had by their performance. They must forget about the result against an incredibly talented and well drilled Exeter side, and take the positives from Wednesday night into the rest of their season. 

Varsity Trip sold out in record time

0

This year’s Varsity ski trip has proved to be more popular than ever, selling out within minutes of booking opening.

 The 2010 trip sold out in 28 hours. The level of demand last Monday, however, exceeded expectation. Two hours after booking opened at 8am the queue had risen to 5,700, for a trip with a capacity of 3,000.

Many students had to wait for several hours to book their place.

One student from Mansfield College commented, “I had to wait for three hours to get my place! I almost missed a tutorial but was just glad I was one of the lucky ones and got on, a few of my friends didn’t quite manage it.” Facebook, meanwhile, was littered with frustrated comments by those waiting. Alex Irons posted, “Queue time 4 hours 32 min. FML.”

Once the demand for places became clear the Varsity trip committee set about trying to arrange more accommodation, securing an extra 200 beds. In response to a query about the possibility of more space on the trip, a spokesperson for the Committee said, “We’re looking into getting some more but we’ve pretty much filled up the resort, and it’s a bit too cold to put up tents so our options are quite limited…especially this late in the day.”

The Varsity Trip is an annual snowsports event that plays host to the Blues Races, where the top Oxford and Cambridge skiers have battled it out since 1922. In recent years the trip has significantly expanded to become the largest student-run ski trip in the world, and includes an extensive entertainment programme featuring artists such as Calvin Harris.

Union angered by Hitler parody

0

A YouTube parody video entitled “Hitler finds out he didn’t make Union president” was taken down after several members of the Oxford Union whose names featured in subtitles of the video, including Union President Izzy Westbury, expressed that they were offended by it.

The video showed a clip from the 2004 war film Downfall, which shows the final ten days of the Fuhrer’s life in a Berlin bunker. The changed subtitles depicted Hitler’s rage upon finding out he had lost the Union elections to Izzy Wesbury.

The video did not seem to target any particular individual although it mentioned the names of several standing committee members and ex-officers. Though there is no suggestion that the character represented by Hitler is directly intended as an attack upon either of the losing candidates at least one Union officer reported that the video had caused offence within Union ranks.


The statement released by the Union stated that, “The Union deeply deplores racist slurs or tasteless personal attacks and even if the perpetrator perhaps thought it amusing, the Union absolutely does not.

“As far as we know, and just as we would expect, no one on the Union committee had any input into this video. All committee members are aware of the high standards of behaviour required of them, and the rules by which they are bound.

“We would like to stress that the Union has no control over what members of the University or the general public say or write about the Union.

“The Union is widely regarded as a bastion of free speech, and in this tradition we would not want to unduly control or stifle what people say, be it complimentary or critical.”

The video was originally posted by a user named “rajivspielberg” which led many Union members to point the finger at Rajiv Dattani, a member of the Standing Committee.

Dattani however, absolved himself of all responsibility in a statement to Cherwell on Monday 10 October.

“I most certainly did not create this video. “I believe that most Oxford students would realise that the creator of this video would not be foolish enough to use their real name.

“This is especially true of a member of the Oxford Union, given it contravenes with [Union rules] which would leave them liable for disciplinary action.”
The rule contravened labels “violent conduct or other behaviour on the Society’s premises liable to distress, offend or intimidate other members” as misconduct.

Dattani continued, “I would not like to speculate as to who it was made by, but I believe that the video is highly inappropriate, and hope that the creator realises this and removes it from Youtube.”

Since then, the video has been taken off the website.

Another Union insider confirmed that “Rajiv Speilberg” was a running joke amongst Union officers because “he may or may not have filmed a tribunal”

An ex-officer told Cherwell it was funny that, “the Union is about freedom of speech, and there’s been a witch-hunt to stop this video.

“I just think it is ironic that on the one hand they invite Nick Griffin, and on the other try to penalise some one who just released a video that is actually quite funny.”

Ryan Kemp, a second year St Peter’s historian who watched the video commented ““I thought the Hitler video was fantastic. Satire is the best form of humour and I think it appears to a lot of people that the Union consumes its members lives and quite possibly their souls as well.

“The video tapped into the cringy parasitic atmosphere effectively, and was popular as a result.”
Despite the amusement the video brought to some viewers, one German student, Richard Pollack, who was on Secretary’s Committee last year suggested that the video caused racial offence to German students, telling Cherwell, “I find the video representative of a generally relaxed attitude towards Nazi jokes in Britain, at the receiving end of which, I have frequently found myself.

“A potential housemate once voiced concerns about the gas bill going up, if he lived with me. While it may be due to my apparent lack of humour, I nevertheless fail to laugh at the implicit comparison of an accomplished Union officer with the twentieth century’s most atrocious mass murder.

“I would be delighted if the debate around the video increased awareness of the fact that the substantial number of German students at this university is rather unamused by these offences, which occur on a daily basis.”



Keble’s Big Fat Gypsy spat

0

A controversial choice of Freshers’ Week bop theme has raised some eyebrows at Keble and around the University.

“Gypsy Bop”, which the Keble Entz Officers called “a celebration of cultural diversity”, was viewed by some as overstepping the line of what is acceptable.

 

“It’s not the most sensitive choice of theme, is it?” remarked one second-year Historian. “It can easily lead to gypsy and traveller culture being taken as something of a joke.”

 

Keble’s JCR has defended its decision to hold a gypsy-themed bop, releasing a statement saying that the “theme, decorations and publication of the party were taken with positivity and creativity.”

 

The bop was advertised with a passage that read, “We are the last generation, a sacred tribe, where university life is still cheap and bountiful. We must make hay while the sun of this Indian Summer shines! Yes, to dance beneath the diamond sky with one hand waving free, silhouetted by the sea, circled by the circus sands… Come with us! Cast off your materialism! Dance, make merry, eat by the fire of our youth and revel.” 

 

It appears that Gypsy Bop was widely referred to as the “Big Fat Gypsy Weddings” Bop, taking cue from the Channel 4 documentary which looked at the lives of gypsies and travellers in Britain today. 

 

One Keble student, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Cherwell, “My first reaction to the theme was how does one dress like a gypsy?”

 

The source claimed that most Keble students reacted sensibly to the theme, saying, “Most people managed to undertake the theme in vaguely good taste, for instance dressing as Esmerelda, essentially ignoring the “Big Fat” part of the theme, so your average Keblite isn’t at fault.”

 

However, he criticised the insensitivity of the organisers, saying, “What is shocking is that no one involved in choosing the theme even asked whether this might be considered offensive. After all, gypsies are a distinct cultural and even ethnic group. Perhaps an analogy would be to have a ‘dress-like-a-Jew bop’, something people hopefully would have realised was offensive.

 

He also claimed that some students did not behave appropriately in response to the theme, claiming that  “the fact that some people took the instruction ‘dress like a gypsy’ to mean turn up in wifebeaters with beer stains on them perhaps shows the level of insensitivity”.

 

This is not the first time Oxford bop or party themes that have been accused of being politically incorrect. Cherwell has previously reported on a “Cross-Gender bop” at St Anne’s, students ‘blacking up’ for Univ’s “Safari bop,” and the University Rugby Club’s “Bring a Fit Jew” night.

 

The Keble bop has reignited the debate over how much organizers of such events should sacrifice creative freedom for purposes of cultural sensitivity.

 

“As long as it’s not done in a derogatory way, I don’t see the problem with it,” said a History and Politics second year.

 

Hubert McGreevy, former president of the Newman Society, Oxford’s oldest Roman Catholic organisation, has been previously quoted as saying, “It is right and important to be sensitive about costumes and themes which mock gender, religion and race. I may find some costumes distasteful, but I would not want to infringe students’ liberties.”

 

Cherwell’s source at Keble explained the choice of theme as being “probably all due to the fact that unlike most other ethnic groups, there are no gypsies and Keble, and indeed no one at Keble is likely to have interacted with gypsies at all, hence why nobody even really stopped to think that the theme could be offensive. 

 

“Inevitably people will hide behind the ‘it was a joke’ defence, but I wonder if people would believe them as much if they had targeted a different ethnic group, that people were more used to defending.”  

 

The Keble Entz Officers maintain that the purpose of the bop was not to laugh at Gypsies, but rather to embrace the positive aspects of their culture. They told students, “Tar us not with the brush of discrimination, but strip off your clothes steeped in materialism, throw them to the floor and dance with us, naked and euphoric. Peace and love, Keble Entz.”

 

In other bop-related news, rumours have been flying around Univ following its Freshers’ Week fancy dress party at which two freshers were taken to hospital for alcohol-related reasons.

 

Professor Michael Collins, Dean of University College, told Cherwell that “no student was detained in hospital,” in response to a report that the freshers in question had been admitted.

 

There has been much speculation as to what the college’s response to this incident will be.

 

“I do not feel it appropriate to comment further on matters that are still under consideration; the College always take incidents such as those that occurred last weekend with the utmost seriousness,” said Professor Collins.


Benjamin Bronselaer in Mozambique

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4098%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4099%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4100%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4101%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4102%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4103%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4104%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4105%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4106%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4107%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4108%%[/mm-hide-text]

Green (and Yellow) shoots of recovery?

0

Crisis? What Crisis? Two International Friendlies, two positive results and the assumption would be that all is rosy in the Brazilian garden. Or is it? Since the bitter disappointment in South Africa coupled with this year’s failure in the Copa America, the Samba Boys have looked a pale shadow of their former selves. A Seleção’s latest set of opponents provided another opportunity to assess Mano Menezes’s choice of personnel, his team’s temperament and, above all, determine whether Verde-Amarelha are headed on the road to recovery. 

Since his installation as Head Coach of the National side last year, following the dismissal of 1994 FIFA World Cup winning captain Dunga, the former Corinthians manager has been frustrated in his attempts to implement the jogo bonito brand of football which many Brazilian fans have wanted to see a return to. A constant shuffling in personnel, a lack of consistency in major tournaments and International Friendlies and, as some Brazilians maintain, an apparent dearth in the quality of resources available to Menezes, as opposed to previous years, explains the team’s current lowly seventh position in the FIFA World rankings However, with the National Team not penciled in to compete in a major tournament until the FIFA Confederations Cup in 2013, Mano Menezes has two full years to tinker, tailor, scrutinize and strengthen his squad. 

Much of the build up however, was again centred on the longstanding debate between the compatibility of the Brazilian domestic calendar with that of FIFA’s international calendar. As it stands, the Campeonato Brasileiro Série A carries on regardless of FIFA’s international dates. And whilst A Seleção would be mad not to use FIFA’s dates in order to continue their preparations for the FIFA World Cup Finals in 2014, several Brazilian managers have been, somewhat unsurprisingly, left infuriated, with a host of big-name players, namely Botafogo’s Jefferson, Flamengo CF’s Ronaldinho, São Paulo’s Lucas Moura, Internacional’s Oscar and Santos’s Neymar, being whisked away for International Duty at a particularly vital time in the season for their respective clubs. Nonetheless, the show must go on and both of Brazil’s performances revealed plenty of strengths as well as weaknesses.

Menezes’s primary concern over these next two years will be to experiment both with formations and, more so, personnel, especially those Brazilian players who are currently plying their trade in the Campeonato Brasileiro Série A. Step forward Botafogo’s 28-year-old goalkeeper Jefferson. There’s no doubt that within the space of 90 minutes at the Estadio Corona in Torreón on Tuesday evening, Brazil’s 49-year-old Head Coach would have seen the Jekyll and Hyde personality of Júlio César’s deputy. Whilst the tall São Paulo born man produced a number of terrific saves, including pulling off a save low down to his left to keep out Andrés Guardado’s penalty in the first-half, he was often guilty of flapping at too many crosses and looked uncertain when in possession which consequently had a similarly unsettling effect on the Brazilian backline.

Despite speaking to Brazilians who argue that the current crop of defenders are the best that the country has witnessed in a decade, both games seemed to somewhat undermine that suggestion. Against Costa Rica, the centre-back paring of Chelsea’s David Luiz and AC Milan’s Thiago Silva, looked susceptible from long balls, often allowing striker Winston Parks to find an outlet in behind the pair. In the face of a more cohesive Mexico team, Brazil’s defence managed to hold its own for large parts of the game however, on the rare occasions when it was breached, its was often as a result of through balls threaded from the midfield through to Mexico’s front three of Real Zaragoza’s Pablo Barrera, and the Barclays Premier League duo of Tottenham Hotspur’s Giovani dos Santos and Manchester United’s Javier Hernández.

Where Menezes will take most encouragement from is further up field in midfield and attack. Despite at times looking shaky, Brazil’s defence was generally well shielded by Liverpool’s defensive-midfielder Lucas Leiva who has become an integral part of the Brazilian set-up. Yet, it was Flamengo CF’s Ronaldinho who arguably stole the headlines. Since his return to the National squad after a four-year absence, the 31-year-old looks revitalized. On Tuesday evening, Brazil’s Captain passed the ball around with confidence. And whilst he may have lost his pace, which once gave rise to his trademark jinking runs, he was central to Brazil’s creativity. Having drawn a number of saves from Mexico goalkeeper Oswaldo Sanchez, the attacking-midfielder capped off a fine display with a wonderful free kick from outside the six-yard box to level the game at 1-1.

Although Ronaldinho was given licence to weave his magic in midfield, he was often left frustrated by the team’s lack of width down both sets of flanks. His frustration is primarily due to Brazil’s formation – that of 4-2-2-2 – which relies heavily on both Full backs bombarding forward along with constant movement upfront from both strikers. Ultimately, a lack of options on both counts often put an end to a series of promising Brazilian attacks in the final third. And yet ironically, when the ball was played out to the wide areas, it paid dividends as Real Madrid’s Marcelo’s marauding run come shot down the left hand side sealed a much deserved win for Menezes’ team and inflict a first defeat for Mexico manager José Manuel de la Torre. The fact remains though, that Brazil have yet to find a way of consistently threatening in attack.

Against Costa Rica, Menezes’s team struggled to get a single shot on target in the entirety of the first half as a result of a disconnection between the front four attackers. Real questions still remain as to what the National Team’s front four should be? Neymar, with his liveliness on the ball, excellent link-up play and goal scoring temperament, is almost sure to spearhead the Brazil attack however the remaining places are very much up for grabs. Internacional striker Leandro Damião has only recently burst onto the scene and it remains to be seen whether he has enough in his game to cope on the International stage; Real Madrid’s Kaká will need to ensure he continues to play regularly under José Mourinho whilst Santos’s Paulo Henrique Ganso must ensure he secures the number 10 jersey.

A Seleção’s preparations continue in earnest in mid-November with away trips to Sub-Saharan Africa and the Arabian subcontinent with matches against next year’s African Cup of Nations co-hosts Gabon and seven-time winners of the competition Egypt in Qatar, respectively. And whilst the real acid test of this current Brazilian team will come against big-name opposition, on this evidence Brazil’s green (and yellow) shoots of recovery are slowly and shyly re-emerging.

Twitter: @aleksklosok