Wednesday, May 7, 2025
Blog Page 1790

Should gay men face extra restrictions when giving blood?

0

Whether men who have had sex with men (MSM) should be allowed to donate blood is not a matter of equality. It’s a matter of the safety of the UK’s blood supply. Johann Hari, writing in the Independent, was spot on when he said that ‘if gay donations really did endanger people, that would trump any commitment to anti-discrimination.’ However, despite the abolition of the lifetime ban on donations from MSM, expected on November 7th, the question remains as to whether the one year blanket deferral that will take its place is strictly necessary. The new regulations, while comparatively positive, certainly do not put gay men on an equal footing with heterosexuals. If they are to be upheld, it must be because they are supported by the evidence.

Thankfully, technological advances have enabled the government to remove the regulation preventing MSM from ever donating. Whereas the equipment used for testing blood donations was once capable of allowing infected blood to pass undetected through screening procedures, and into the blood supply, that risk no longer exists. Any virus is now almost guaranteed to be detected. The upshot of this is that MSM can now donate blood, one year after their last sexual encounter (defined as anal or oral sex, whether safe or not), because any infection they do have will show up during testing, allowing the blood to be excluded if necessary. There is a deferral time because of the ‘window period’, which exists between the contraction of a virus and its being detectable by testing. Since those who carry a virus from recent sexual activity could donate infected blood which is not caught by the screening process during this period, a deferral is necessary. However, the length of this deferral seems strangely long, given technology’s reduction of the window period to around two weeks. This is due to the strange behaviour of the Hepatitis B virus. For those individuals who naturally eliminate the virus, there is another window period near the end of its lifespan. Since people need not know that they are infected, it is necessary to have a deferral time which eliminates any possibility of the virus’s transmission into the blood supply during either of these window periods. The same one year deferral is already in place for other groups considered high risk, such as those who have visited Sub-Saharan Africa.

Many are still not content with the recent change, however. There is outrage that the male gay community (to whom the rule almost exclusively applies) is being treated as some single entity, rather than a group of individuals, the riskiness of whose sexual practices is varied and diverse. While it’s obvious that those who have, say, had unprotected anal sex within the past year ought to be deferred (the same is apparently not true of those who have had unprotected heterosexual sex, since the incidence of infection is considerably higher amongst MSM), it seems puzzling, and potentially prejudiced, to prevent a man in a long term monogamous homosexual relationship, who practises only safe sex with his partner, from donating blood.

Ultimately, it comes down to whether you believe the evidence. SaBTO, the advisory committee on the safety of blood, tissues and organs, maintains that sexual accidents, indiscretions, and non-compliance from donors, all of which transcend sexual orientation, are enough to require a blanket year-long deferral on blood donation from men who have had sex with men. Since the rate of infection amongst MSM is so much higher than amongst non-MSM, so the argument goes, every broken condom, every unfaithful boyfriend, and every blood donor that lies about his eligibility to donate, counts for that much more amongst MSM — so much so as to make a generalised rule necessary.

If this is not the case, several things follow. Firstly, it would mean that the lifetime ban that has been in force until now was ill-conceived, and not just because of technological advances. If the riskiness of MSM donation isn’t high enough to warrant a blanket year-long deferral, then, for as long as that same group has been of a similar risk level, the lifetime ban has been unnecessary: a man practising safe sex is only excluded for one year because of the possibility that he has an infection that he doesn’t know about (or is lying about his last sexual encounter). While the same possibility exists for non-MSM, the risk is deemed too high amongst MSM donors. If this is in fact not true, then MSM practising safe sex should have been eligible for donation even when tests were not as thorough — the inherent risk associated with MSM would not have been great enough to necessitate their being prevented from donating, just as the risk of a heterosexual man contracting a virus is not great enough to require his exclusion.

If the risk does not exist, there should be no hesitation in scrapping a rule which simultaneously retards the progress of gay rights, while doing nothing to make the blood supply safer. But the government’s priority lies in ensuring safe blood stocks. Any future decision to further alter the existing regulations should be based on evidence indicating that there will be no greater risk to patients receiving blood — and on nothing else.

Cherwell Music’s guide for freshers

0

Venues

Baby Love

Home to the city’s premier gay night (Poptarts, Tuesdays), best alt dance night (Eclectric, even week Thursdays), and gathering place of the University’s self-appointed glitterati (Supermarket, odd week Thursdays), the tiny bar known as Baby Love is integral to the Oxford night scene. With its unisex bathrooms, drink-soaked staircase, and grotto-esque dancefloor, it tends to get more than a little cramped, but the music and company are (usually) worth it. So dump your coat in one of those grimy makeout booths, grab a Woo Woo (£4), and enjoy the beat.

The Jericho Tavern

Tucked away in the attic of North Oxford’s rather well-to-do Jericho. the Jericho Tavern is the city’s most legendary music venue: The Jericho. Radiohead debuted here in 1986, Ride and Supergrass made their break on its (cramped) stage. The Jericho still offers the most varied line-ups in Oxford, including shows from local notables and student bands as well as playing host to touring indie up-and-comers. It’s dark, it’s loud, but for the devotees of Oxford’s lively music scene, it’s home.

Modern Art Oxford

For anyone interested in getting acquainted with the city’s music scene, MAO should be a regular haunt. Not the most obvious place to look for live music, the gallery’s schedule isn’t exactly cram-packed with gigs but the cheap as anything shows in MAO’s small basement space are always worth a punt. Having recently hosted the spectacular ODC Drumline vs. Coloureds (four live drummers playing to fuzzed-out electro, what’s not to love?), MAO is consistently at the forefront of Oxford’s fascinating music scene and warrants a visit during the day for its always interesting, although admittedly of variable quality, exhibitions which change a couple of times per term.

The Cellar

Hidden down the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it Frewin Court, just off Cornmarket Street in the centre of town, The Cellar bar has something of a split personality. Jumping without a thought from comedy club to live music venue to night club, The Cellar’s schedule is as eclectic as its punters. Of the regular events at The Cellar, dancing the night away on the packed stage between the huge, bass spewing speakers at d&b/dubstep night Freerange is a highlight and probably one of the best nights out Oxford has to offer.

 

Shows

The Horrors, O2 Academy 21st October

The gloomy post-punk sounds of Southend’s hippest export The Horrors should serve as a fitting soundtrack to Michaelmas term’s shortening days and fast approaching essay deadlines. Touring with their expansive new record, Skying, The Horrors have spent the summer on the festival circuit refining their already well-oiled live show. Prepare for cinematic keyboards, pounding bass and drainpipes.

DOOM, O2 Academy 10th November

Masked Atlanta rapper and underground legend MF DOOM has carefully cultivated an aura of mystique. Ever the ‘supervillain’, he is known to send imposters to his own live shows in his stead. Still, the risk is worth it for DOOM, an unsurpassed lyrical genius and producer extraordinaire. This isn’t your standard shouted-out hype hip hop gig: expect a brooding, rhyme-spitting performance.

Wild Beasts, O2 Academy 11th November

Wild Beasts, coming off their acclaimed release of Smother, have a strain of earnest theatrically that makes their music peerless, and their gigs are no different. Their operatic renderings of picaresque Kendal lad life are translated perfectly into the live setting. Thorpe and Fleming’s voices ricochet off the rafters, matched in intensity only by their ferocious and marvellously precise instrumental backing. Consummate professionals all, the quartet is sure to deliver. Come early for delightful dream pop openers Braids.

UCAS changes could threaten Oxford admissions

0

The UK’s university application system could be dramatically changed following a proposal for pupils to apply only after receiving their A-level results.

The plan, revealed by the UCAS chief executive to university vice-chancellors, would see exams set at least a month earlier, in April and May, so results could be released in July. This system, which could be implemented as early as 2016, would enable pupils to apply for courses the following autumn, replacing the current system of conditional offers entirely.

Arguments supporting change were strengthened by UCAS investigations finding only 45% of predicted grades, upon which many applications are currently based, have proven accurate. A Warwick University researcher explained this as the result of private schools over-predicting results as they “compete to get [students] into Oxbridge and other Russell group universities”.  Contrarily, some state schools, particularly those which may be unused to pupils receiving top grades, have been unwilling under the present system to predict strong results.

The proposal was welcomed by Jack Watson, JCR Secretary at Regent’s Park, who stated, “There are numerous candidates who are more than capable of achieving [the 3 A] entry requirement but fail to apply to Oxford because they lack the self-belief that they will achieve 3 A’s or don’t have teachers familiar with sending students to Oxbridge to drive them to do so.” However, Watson did caution that “a private school applicant is statistically more likely to have better A level grades than a comprehensive school applicant”, so access would only improve if there was no increased time-pressure forcing an over-reliance on grades.

Jack Evans, JCR President at Corpus, more positively stated that post-qualification applications could “only strengthen the opportunities for those from poorer backgrounds applying to Oxford.” He confidently predicted that “if Oxford really feels as passionately about the interviewing process as they claim (…) the existing admissions arrangements will just be pushed back six months” rather than criteria being changed.

An Oxford Admissions spokesperson gave this reassurance, stating that “at Oxford exam results are really only the minimum requirement rather than the determining factor.” The university currently looks at written work, admissions tests and interviews and there has been no suggestion that these would be sacrificed were there to be a change in application dates.

One second-year student, who went to a state school in South London before applying to Oxford, expressed doubts as to the practicality of such time constraints, commenting, “Oxford’s application process rests upon the aptitude testing and interviewing process, without which the university would struggle to gain a true reflection of each candidate’s potential and course suitability. How such a process could ever feasibly continue within such a shortened time scale remains to be seen.”

Hannah Cusworth, OUSU’s Vice-President for Access and Academic Affairs, also showed the importance of receiving these materials, stating, “Oxford is so oversubscribed for many subjects, and the majority of candidates have the top grades, so tutors will still need these other methods to distinguish between candidates.” Furthermore, Cusworth was sceptical as to whether post-qualification applications could actually greatly help traditionally underrepresented groups. She suggested that “studying at Oxford requires different skills to those needed to get A*s at school”, but “the number of students who get the grades to come to Oxford or Cambridge already corresponds relatively closely to the numbers who apply.”

The Russell Group of Universities was also hesitant to fully back the proposal. A spokesperson stated that they remained unconvinced that the plan would not restrict ability to “make a fair and thorough assessment of applicants” and also warned that applicants would be given a reduced opportunity to decide where to apply. There are concerns that damage could be made to existing outreach schemes and that earlier exams could disadvantage all pupils.

UCAS is currently conducting a review of the admissions process and is collecting feedback on its new proposal, the full details of which are expected to be published in a consultation document in October.

No Benefits

0

Surprise, surprise: a silly little romcom which, upon reflection, I should probably have known would fail to be anywhere near as cool as its two main stars. Friends with Benefits might be made bearable by Timberlake and Kunis, but you never stop knowing the pleasure is a superficial guilty one that’ll last about as long as the global economy’s recovery.

It starts off very badly, and the cheese factor is only lightly lowered from that moment on. Five minutes in and the cheap point scoring begins, the film taking advantage of everyone’s love of New York with some obligatory skyline shots and boy-meets-girl moments unfolding against the backdrop of Rockefeller Plaza and Times Square. If only we were all New Yorkers looking as lovely as these two and enjoying casual white collar jobs, we’d be living the dream. As it is, though, we’re not, so seeing them live it will have to do.

The film seems to think it can avoid being cliché simply by talking about the crimes that films like itself normally commit, so we spend a lot of time listening to Timberlake moan about Hollywood relationship myths which are never representative of how love works in real life. Unfortunately, this doesn’t work; firstly because, sorry, but you’re two years late – (500) Days of Summer already did that, and it did it better; secondly, it’s only a matter of time before the film starts reeling those clichés off itself (I felt like playing romcom cliché bingo, but writing the tick list would have taken longer than the film lasted); and thirdly because this once again feels like manipulative dialogue that’s served up merely to make us give ourselves congratulatory pats on the back for already knowing everything he’s saying.

So if the feel-good factor described so far sounds phoney, sorry, but it is. The only flashes of real fun come as the casual sex begins, and the jokes in their opening encounter, for a brief moment, do show signs of amusing. Unfortunately, like the sex this doesn’t last long, and before we know it they’re falling out only to wait to fall in love properly, and the screen time’s being filled up with pointless secondary plots involving unnecessarily weird secondary characters, and you wonder what happened to Sean Parker and Black Swan‘s Lily, and you wish Sorkin reshaped this oh-so average script so you could see these two really get it on.

Their looks are good enough and their smiles sufficiently beaming that most of this bitterness is only an aftertaste, but when it comes and you reflect on the price of your cinema ticket, it’s an aftertaste and a half. I still like both Kunis and Timberlake. Watching both of them act is really enjoyable. But after showing what they are capable of earlier this year, they shouldn’t be settling for second-rate cinema like this, and neither should we.

Amsterdamned: Two

0

The following morning we actually got up reasonably early considering our long night, and decided to finally sample the delights of NEMO, somewhere I’d been before but was so impressed by that it demanded a second viewing. NEMO is essentially a giant science centre for kids near the main rail station in Amsterdam. The closest equivalent in the UK is probably @ Bristol if you know what that is, but NEMO is much cooler. We set off with a girl we had befriended at the hostel that morning, and were treated to the worst weather yet, torrential rain and extreme wind almost snapping my brolly in half and soaking us all before we’d even got there. Understandably we were a little deflated by the time we reached the iconic ship-modelled building, but we soon warmed up and got into the spirit of things. It’s one of those ‘learning can be fun’ sort of places, but it can actually back up its claims for once with all these computer programmes (like one where you can age yourself or change your gender), cool simulations and interactive experiment things. Of course, it was Amsterdam, so there was an extensive sex section in NEMO, which was a little disconcerting with all the kids running about. In addition, there was a hilarious demonstration of what happens when you give spiders drugs, with the pothead spider’s web resembling a torn fishnet stocking and the LSD spider’s web looking a little bit intense and tight. Only in Amsterdam.

After the place closed (we’d been there hours and still hadn’t seen it all), we lost our new friend as we decided to Take Art Seriously in the Stedelijk modern art museum. Now I’m not a big art guy, but I’ve been to a few places with my family and an old girlfriend who was an artist so I can walk around the installations pretty cheerfully. They had a couple of Mondrians which were pretty cool, and on the whole the installations were quite interesting. Some were a bit pretentious of course (all rotting bananas and floating screens and stuff) but there was some pretty inspired stuff too and a couple of modern oil paintings that I really liked. Our cultural palettes securely sated, we had a quick dinner then went off to the last activity of our trip, a canal boat tour. As we sat down in the mood-lit boat with a small aromatic candle on our table we realised that perhaps this was a BIT romantic, but decided to go with it. The tour was an hour and a half but it flew by really, and it was really interesting. I learned that Amsterdam’s massive rail station had had nowhere to be built, so they had constructed land in one of the canals for it to sit on, just where we had been earlier that day at NEMO as it turned out. We were also witness to the countless ‘houseboats’ which offered riverfront property at easier rates, but which were actually often luxury apartments inside (and people really didn’t close their blinds. Ohhh, no). There was a bit of a turf war going on between the people with actual houses who thought the boats were impacting on their house prices, and the ‘Yuppies’ (as our guide called them) who resisted, and also tried to sue canal tours like ours for invasion of privacy. I was also relieved to learn that the Amsterdam fire department have a mechanism for pulling horses out of the canal. Y’know, just in case.

We learned loads more on the boat, too much to put here, and got to see Amsterdam at night which is truly beautiful. The buildings are all lit up and shining and the light casts into the water where it ripples and shimmers in the tide as people walk alongside, the city if anything getting busier at night. That was our last night, and although we went to a bar later (Which was a little An American Werewolf in London, if you catch my drift) I think I prefer to leave Amsterdam like that —beautiful, dark and bursting with life. My friends and I had a great time, different to what any of us were expecting but probably better too. I think we saw loads of sides to the city and really got to grips with the culture there, and we met some great people. I suppose you could say that we didn’t dig too deep into the darker side, the reason most lads would go to Amsterdam, but I think our way was just as fun, and just as worthwhile.

Although to be honest, if we had done loads of really debauched things, do you think I’d write about them on here?

What happens in Amsterdam….

From Europe with Love: The Final Countdown

0

Our arrival in Vienna was a little short of smooth: bowling into the city at half eleven meant half an hour before the hostel (which was, helpfully, in an unknown location) closed check in for the night. Thankfully, after twenty five minutes of tripping over various tram rails with our bags, we managed to find it and crash out for the night: it’s amazing how tiring train travel is, and how sitting in a chair for five hours becomes exhausting!

Vienna was a short stop, but we got a chance to see a lot of the city: it’s clean, modern and full of unexpected things for the casual tourist to see. Our first day consisted of being soaked in torrential rain as we walked around the old Hofburg palace and buildings in the MuseumsQuartier of the city; such a contrast to the baking heat of Croatia. The British summer returns, then! Coming to Austria also meant going back to real prices and “real” money- it was all too easy to wantonly spend, feigning a misunderstanding of the Croatian Kuna.

We quickly found out that there are quite a few unmissable things to see in the city, despite Vienna not being one of the more obvious places in Europe to visit. Blagging our way across the baffling S-Bahn system (with, worryingly, only my broken GCSE German to help us) on our Interrail passes, we visited Prater, a huge park which is also a permanent fairground. Admittedly, eight euros is a little painful in exchange for a wooden London Eye lookalike, regardless of the view of the city, but the area is pretty amusing for a couple of hours. Vienna also boasts the Hundertwasser Haus, a crazy architectural feat built in the late eighties: we wandered for about an hour to find it, despite it being dubbed as the “most visited monument in Vienna”. Right. It is, however, astounding: a block of social housing made up of uneven floors painted in an array of bright colours, with fluid lines of metallic brick criss-crossing it, and the odd tree sprouting from a window to boot. It’s eccentric, vibrant and really worth a see! Witnessing all this artistic splendour works up an appetite; we gave into temptation and ate Schnitzel: an escalope which is suspiciously like a chicken burger, but made good preparation for the five hour train to Prague awaiting us that evening.

The Czech capital is raved about by almost everyone who has visited, and I definitely did not want to be let down by this one! Our hostel, the Old Prague Hostel, was a real find, located just a ten minute walk from the main square. It’s amazing how much public transport costs, and it was definitely the time to tighten the budget (what budget?!) three weeks in to the trip! Freed then from the burden of the rucksacks, venturing out into the old town failed to disappoint. Despite crawling with tourists (the most amusing being the large German group taking the segway tour of the city, quoted as “the coolest way to see Prague” by one naive user), the central area is truly atmospheric, and possesses a northern feel which really suits the overcast sky, much as we regretted the lost days of sun behind us.

Climbing the clock tower was an ideal way for us to witness a view of the city, which is so beautiful with terracotta tiled roofs next to sooty stone towers and spires: really evokes a sort of gothic, fairytale feel to the whole area. Prague castle and the cathedral were well worth the visit, sitting on top of a hill across the river, which we crossed via the old bridge: rows of impressive, if slightly scary, statues of saints line the sides, whilst imposing gates with spires frame each end.

Our experience in Prague at night was equally atmospheric, after a near-disaster cooking dinner in the hostel kitchen (a cheap option, granted, but not exactly easy with three groups of six trying to prepare meals at once around one stove and one work surface, with ten plates between us all). Our main focus, however, was on the beer, which was sold at the equivalent of 98p per half litre. And was, unbelievably, very good! We decided to avoid the slightly embarrassing British alcohol-tourist look by ditching the recommended bar and pub crawls which suck in hundreds of tourists each evening in the city, but after experimenting with the supposed local tradition of beating tankards on the table with each new drink it became clear that we were just as cringeworthy.

Booked onto a night train to Amsterdam, we spent our last day in Prague seeing the Communism Museum: a slightly bizarre choice, but a really interesting insight into the history of Czechoslovakia which only split a few years before we were born. The days spent before boarding a night train are always slightly like purgatory, as we were working towards a deadline: the only option we could see was to eat more filling and delicious Czech food and indulge in more of the cheap beer, before buying some additional food for the train (not that we needed it!). In true student style, we were won over by hare pâté at a French market: add a couple of cartons of red wine, and some dark chocolate, it’s the perfect range of, ahem, budget snacks. Or, the bill of fare of several wannabe eccentric academics: perhaps not the best idea of the trip!

The night train was largely uneventful, even if a six person couchette is a huge squeeze. Having never visited Germany before, it was surreal to go through Dresden and Berlin in the evening and to wake up having just left Dusseldorf in the morning, yet this was all part of why the night rail journeys are so important (although making the most of the interrail pass and booking a bed is absolutely essential!) We reached Amsterdam, groggy and hungry, at 10am, where we were escorted as the last ones off of the train by an angry guard, who began by barking “Aus” as it became apparent that we were in no way ready to get out of bed. Nevertheless we soon met another friend from Pembroke who lives in the Netherlands, with whom we would be staying for the weekend: a great opportunity to see the city without panicking over directions!

Amsterdam is picturesque with its network of canals (all of which look exactly the same): this is rather incongruous as streets open up into the red light district, with women in windows even in the morning! Equally surreal was moving on to the Anne Frank house, a completely moving exhibit of Anne Frank’s diary and the hidden annexe: despite having become a clichéd destination for tourists, it was desperately sad and thought provoking. We spent some time in the Van Gogh museum, too, which shows the life of the painter through a chronological exhibiting of his works. It’s a very well thought out exhibition, in fact, as certain famous paintings such as “Sunflowers” do not stand out, whilst you find other brilliant works, such as some of Van Gogh’s oils which take influence from older Japanese artworks.

Staying with our friend’s family meant home cooked meals (heavenly after three weeks of surviving on our own) and great hospitality, but also an experience of the rural area of the Netherlands that is actually known as Holland. Canals are everywhere and the landscape is, as expected, totally flat: we witnessed a change as a huge thunderstorm moved in overnight, in which I saw the most forked lightning that I have ever seen- a really inspiring experience!

Our final leg of the journey took us to Brussels, in which we stayed in the house of one of the companions travelling with us. People have mentioned to me that Brussels is “boring”, but this certainly wasn’t the case! The city centre alternates between modern (and very dominated by the EU presence there) and historic, with the main square being made up of overwhelmingly ornate buildings. Even in September, it seemed Christmassy! The famous sights of the city such as the strange manneken-pis and the atomium pale, however, in comparison with the Delirium Café: a huge multi-story pub which stocks 2004 different types of beer. Quite an experience and a definite crash course in Belgian-beer-for-dummies!

The final visit that we made was to Bruges, an hour’s train away from the capital. The city is most like Toledo and Prague in being very preserved in a tight and quaint historic style, and we saw quite a few old churches: not necessarily the most fun way to spend an afternoon, but the Basilica of the Holy Blood in the centre of the town is really worth a look. We completed the day with a boat tour in what was, essentially, a teacup which was alarmingly tipping at the rear where I was sitting, and more draught Belgian beer in a recommended student pub (having a friend who lives locally is such an advantage!). Such a fairytale city was a fitting way for me to leave the trip, boarding the Eurostar (with a discount ticket procured through a chance last minute booking) back to Britain, home comforts, and the reality of the majority of a reading list and assorted other chores to complete before the next term begins. It’s true, however, that interrailing is an opportunity that you can really make the most of as a student, and I’m sure that the experience will seem like a beacon to me in the middle of an essay crisis next term. Any tips that I can give? Overbudget, as you will spend everything. Always book hostels with provide free breakfast. Do drink the local beer. And always, always wake up on time when on a night train!

Amsterdamned: One

0

Now, I’ve been to Amsterdam before, but under quite different circumstances, and with my family. Understandably, this particular jaunt avoided Amsterdam’s more infamous attractions, and focussed rather more on museums and historical sites (apart from one memorably awkward instance when my granddad and I wandered into the red light district, but that’s another story). But this time would be different. This time I was going with my friends Will, Dave and Mark, staying in a youth hostel and exercising our independence in one of the most exciting and debauched cities in the world.

It sort of worked.

As soon as we arrived, we tried to get to grips with the public transport system, and found it infinitely confusing. We found that on the trams you could only buy an hour return ticket, but there was no real mechanism to prevent you from just getting on the bus and then just leaving without paying. Obviously we were good citizens and didn’t take advantage, but I was struck that this was a very different kind of place — where in Britain would they trust you like that? Soon we were at the hostel, The Flying Pig Uptown, and this too was a new experience for me — I’d never stayed in a hostel before. I’ll be honest, I found the relaxed attitude and informality a little jarring at first, but soon I got used to it and really enjoyed the friendly, casual atmosphere there. After a brief unpack we hit up a cheap Italian place for some food, then went to one of Amsterdam’s ‘Brown Cafes’ for a few drinks and some cards. We found this great little place (it didn’t seem to have a name) full of both locals and a couple of tourists, and we stayed there until closing. During our time there we sampled a drink unique to the Netherlands and Belgium, ‘Jenever’, a potent drink distilled from Juniper berries. English gin evolved from the drink, and I quite enjoyed it — it was very strong but malty, and warmed me up for the evening.

Upon returning to the hostel, hoping to get acquainted with our room-mates, we were surprised to find them all tucked up in bed. Instead, we went down to the hostel bar (which was also pretty quiet) before we called it a night.

The next morning we got up at an almost unholy hour for teenage males (10!!!!) to take advantage of our included breakfast, before taking to the pavements to explore the city a little. Unfortunately we’d picked a week of poor weather to travel, so torrential rain put paid to our cheerful ramblings, and after we’d seen the War Memorial in Dam square (and one sodden magician attempting to perform) we took shelter in the ‘Oude Kerk’ (Old Church) of Amsterdam. This church was first consecrated in 1306 but now placed rather incongruously in the main red light district. The Oude Kerk has this massive carved wooden infrastructure, very different from anything I’d seen before and very impressive even though it was going through one of many renovations due to years of disuse. Much of the stained glass had also obviously been pretty beaten up, but it was still quite engaging (although admittedly we paid more attention to avoid the rain outside). Once the rain had eased off a little we headed out and accidentally (honest) plunged straight into the heart of the red light district. Admittedly it was a Tuesday afternoon, so it wasn’t exactly the last days of Rome out there, but we still saw an awful lot of what Amsterdam had to offer. If I’m entirely truthful, I found it a bit off-putting having all these scantily clad women staring at me from less than a metre away behind glass. It was hard not to feel like a bit of a perv just by being there. The rest of the district was a mass of sex shops, sex theatres and weed cafes, but mixed in with very ordinary homes and businesses. I thought that there was a great sitcom idea in the man who opened a bike shop in between two brothels. Make him a strict Roman Catholic and we have a series!

The next day was our day of debauchery, starting with us taking a swing at The Sex Museum. The result was slightly harrowing, not helped by the pneumatic dummy of a flasher or the overweight, naked prostitute dummy that shot out of a wall screaming at me (but didn’t seem to be triggered by ANYONE ELSE). I was also slightly traumatised by all the ancient plates and artefacts decorated with sexual images and phalluses, realising the extent that museums had concealed from me over the years. Still, the Victorian porn was quite funny. Great muttonchops! After all this excitement we reckoned we could use a stiff drink, so we undertook a seven-hour bar crawl. Maybe a bit of overkill, but it was a lot of fun. We flitted between six different clubs and bars, taking what free drinks we could, even if it was just a manly white wine or a cinnamon shot. It was a great night, with loads of great happenings like Dave’s success with some young ladies from Sheffield uni (one, a Cambridge resident, seemed determined to tear into me for being an Oxford student — does the rivalry extend to residents? I didn’t think it did), and Will taking two stomach punches from bouncers for free drinks (one of which he gave to a tall Australian girl like a chump, who disappeared straight afterwards). We found ourselves scraping the barrel of what burger king had to offer at 3 in the morning before we retired to our hostel to further demonize ourselves in the eyes of our room-mates by being noisy. An appropriate end to the night, I think.

To be continued…

Festivals: Do and Don’t

0

Having just come back from Bestival, with Reading a couple of weeks before that, I’ve come up with a handy list of ‘do’s and ‘don’t’s that you can learn from for next summer.

Don’t forget that it’s a music festival, not a weekend camping. You may as well see a few bands. You never know, you might even like them.

Do pace yourself. Festivals are more of a marathon than a sprint. While it always seems like drinking everything you can lay your hands on during the first day, when there’s not even music to act as a distraction, is a good way to pass the time, the three day long hangover afterwards tends to get in the way of the rest of the festival. Sleep is another one to watch. While it seems like a great idea at the time to challenge each other, in the spirit of ‘laddishness’, to a contest of who can avoid going to sleep first, with the threat of a quasi-homoerotic bukkake session for the loser, at about six when the sun rises you tend to realise how badly you’ve misjudged the situation. Or just wake up a little bit sticky and with nowhere to shower.

Don’t go in fancy dress unless it’s appropriate. For some festivals fancy dress is practically encouraged, for others it tends to be the territory of those desperate for attention or just so far gone they have no idea what they’ve been dressed up in. However at others, normally the more ‘boutique’ ones (for those fluent in festi-speak), fancy dress is something practically encouraged, and not dressing up immediately marks you out as one of ‘those people’, the sort that turn up to bops without a costume or have just come as ‘insert character here on their day off’. And nobody wants to be one of those people.

Do check the tent before you go. I made the mistake of believing that the tent I had left in the roof of my garage five years ago would definitely be in exactly the same condition that I had packed it away in. I was proved very, very wrong. Having raced to find a campsite and get the tents up before it started raining I opened up the tent bag and pulled out the tent, only to find it tearing like tissue paper. This led to a trip to the nearest camping shop, in the rain that I had been trying to avoid, to buy a tent that I’m pretty sure I paid twice what it was worth. The only saving grace was that after the festival I took back my tent, claiming it leaked, and managed to get a full refund.

Don’t bother collecting cups. While I’ve heard at some festivals collecting cups can be relatively easy, profitable and carries little social stigma, at Reading these points definitely do not apply. While 10p a cup may seem like it initially stacks up, you’ll probably spend well more than that on the £5 pints needed to make the task of clambering around on the floor, picking up screwed up bits of cardboard on the floor (or even worse, begging strangers for their cups) bearable.

Do remember appropriate footwear. If it rains, bring wellies. If you don’t your feet are going to know about it and you’re going to regret it, trench-foot makes for one of the worst festival souvenirs (get a t-shirt instead, if you must). Always remember a comfortable pair of trainers though, or any sort of shoe that is designed to actually fit feet. After four days of wearing wellies you’ll realise the person that designed them must have had an element of masochism about them; your soles will feel as though they have lost a boxing match with the floor while your little toes are not likely to ever be the same again.

Don’t plan to buy all your food and drink there. The local supermarkets will be very busy. Literally, it’s like a nuclear war has been announced and panic buying has set in, except if everyone panic buying was already drunk and unable to push the trolley in a straight line. You’ll get overwhelmed by the choice of food, when all you can really keep for longer than a day is biscuits and crisps (give up on the five-a-day/any sources of protein, carbs are your friend), and while the beer may be cheap, your muscles will not let you forget about it when you’ve carried two crates a couple of miles through the mud. Equally buying your food on-site is a no-go, unless you’ve recently won the lottery. Festival supermarkets charge M&S prices for Aldi goods, and the hot food stands think nothing of charging you £5 for a burger WITHOUT CHIPS. Saying that, if you are buying your food there choose Bestival’s range of freshly made and locally sourced food, which ranges from paella to sausages, as opposed to Reading’s ‘variety’ (the highlight of which is a giant Yorkshire pudding stand).

Do choose your spot carefully. Your spot very much depends on your outlook, as well as the festival. At Reading the further forward you get the less space you get to stand in (until you get so far forward you are just being held up by other people), and as soon as the music starts you will need to use all your concentration just to stay up as everyone decides to drunkenly make some space/surge forward. This will happen in any band. Seriously, I was once forced to mosh to an acoustic Mumford and Sons performance. Further back tends to give you a bit more space and a chance of actually seeing the band/enjoying the music, as opposed to this just being a soundtrack to your survival attempts. At Bestival you’re probably a bit safer, everyone’s too busy skanking to think about anyone else.

Don’t forget to charge your phone. The music is best enjoyed with friends, and I can guarantee that as soon you enter the arena you’ll lose them. I have literally been behind someone in the queue and managed to lose them within five seconds of getting in, and meeting points are a great idea until its five minutes before the band starts and you suddenly realise there is more than one ice cream van by the side of the stage.

Do explore the other things on offer (sometimes). At some festivals the music is just the beginning, at others it’s very much the end. At Bestival I danced to 80s classics in a fake hollowed-out tree, to blues in a grungy bar, heard some reggae and chilled on some hanging benches, all after the main stages had finished. On the other hand when the music ends at Reading you may as well go to bed (unless you want to brave the 500 capacity silent disco, which for a site of 90,000 is a bit small and tends to lead to queuing).

Don’t trust the weather forecast. It’s never right. If it says it’s going to be sunny, bring waterproofs. If it predicts rain, bring a pair of trainers.

Government backpedals on tuition fee policy

0

Universities will be offered incentives to lower their fees as part of the government’s recent adjustments to its policy on tuition fees.

A recent study by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) has outlined several problems that may result from the policy outlined in the initial White Paper on higher education released in June.

When the White Paper was published the government expected that most universities would opt to charge an average of £7,500 for tuition with only a few élite universities charging the maximum level of £9,000. However, the vast majority of Universities have declared that they will charge £9,000 which has caused the government to rethink some of the details of their plans.

Benjamin Maconick, Keble student and co-chair of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats, acknowledged the government’s error of judgement, commenting, “It probably was a mistake of the government not to foresee that a lot of universities would charge £9k as a ‘prestige’ marker.”

Maconick predicted that the situation may correct itself naturally, saying, “I think common sense will work its magic and students will realise that universities such as Southbank are not worth £9k a year, and will hopefully stop applying there.”

The government’s latest proposals aim to discourage universities from charging more than £6000, by limiting the number of students they can take on. However, universities will be free to take as many students as they want with AAB or higher at A-level, as the limitations only apply to students with lower grades.

The HEPI report raised concerns that these plans will leave universities less inclined to admit students with high potential but lower grades which could increase the bias towards independent schools.

The Oxford University Press Office responded by saying that this aspect of the policy will not affect Oxford as the University “will continue to look for those with the ability and potential to succeed here, but with more than 33,000 students getting AAA every year and more than 17,000 applicants to Oxford, the University’s standard AAA offer will not be changing any time soon.”

The HEPI study added that the need for Universities to compete for the top students may cause scholarships to become more “needs blind”, to which the Press Office said, “From 2012 Oxford’s fee waivers and bursaries will provide the greatest support for the poorest students of any university in the country, and this is a fact in which the University takes great pride.”

The government has also recently released proposals to charge penalties to graduates in England who repay their student loans early. The aim of the proposal is to prevent students who don’t need loans taking them out, putting them in an interest-earning savings account and paying them back at a profit.

James Lawson, chairman of the Oxford University Conservative Association commented: “Early repayment penalties are only one idea in consultation. The government will continue to review its policies in order to maximise fairness and quality in education.’

Meanwhile Benjamin Maconick of OULD, though agreeing that “the new system is undeniably progressive”, took a more negative view on this specific aspect of the government’s plans saying that the policy would cause unnecessary harm to “students from less well off backgrounds for whatever reason wanting to pay off their loans early, for example by being particularly fiscally prudent etc.”

In a report submitted to the government on Wednesday, a large group of academics, including several members of the Oxford University Campaign for Higher Education, declared that “the aim of increasing social mobility is likely to be frustrated by devices such as removing the numbers cap for AAB applicants, which will tend to concentrate students from private and public schools in the ‘top’ universities.”

The report is Oxford academics’ second major display of opposition since they voted for a motion of no-confidence in David Willetts in June. In it concerns were also raised about the forcing of market mechanisms into higher education and the encouragement of the creation of different types of higher education institutions including private universities and examination institutions that do not teach.

It concluded that the coalition’s tuition fees policy has “no vision for the medium or long-term and demonstrates a worrying lack of foresight about the foreseeable consequences and level of risk which attends the proposed experiment.”

Review: Bombay Bicycle Club – A Different Kind of Fix

0

For a young band to radically change their sound from one album to the next can often be a bad sign, especially in regard to their future. It suggests a fundamental difference within the band about what kind of music they should be making. Think of Panic! At the Disco’s change from the angst-ridden teen emo of A Fever You Can’t Sweat Out to their 60’s pop-inspired sophomore effort Pretty Odd complete with Beatles-esque melodies and hair. They split soon afterwards.

Bombay Bicycle Club underwent a similarly momentous shift from their 2009 post-punk inspired debut, I Had The Blues But I Shook Them Loose, to their second album Flaws, essentially an acoustic folk album. However, upon hearing A Different Kind of Fix, Bombay’s third album, the change in genre makes sense. The electric guitars and the major keys are back but the lush sound of Flaws along with its more mature song structures and frontman Jack Steadman’s soulful folk-developed delivery remain. The result is impressive and the ease with which Bombay Bicycle Club have managed to change their style betrays their extensive musical talents. A Different Kind of Fix is incredibly consistent throughout, and its line-up consists of beautifully melodic songs. Stand-out tracks include album opener ‘How Can You Swallow So Much Sleep’ and the brilliantly infectious and hook-filled first single, ‘Shuffle’, which will undoubtedly have the listener producing a few outrageously dancey shoulder movements whilst mumbling along in an attempt to harness the energy, if not the sense, of the chorus.

The album also exhibits a far denser layering of sound than was present on their previous records with more sophisticated studio techniques being employed. This strengthens the moodier songs, such as ‘Bad Timing’ and ‘What You Want’, by creating the kind of enveloping and atmospheric tone similar to artists such as Wild Beasts, as well as using keyboards and synthesizers to infuse the more upbeat tracks with urgency. There is a nod to Flaws during the simple acoustic verses of ‘Beggars’ but A Different Kind Of Fix sees Bombay Bicycle Club move towards a bigger sound that will surely spark renewed interest in their output.