Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Blog Page 1898

Santa’s Bookbag

ELLA: I’ve recently discovered just how much I choose books by their titles. I’ve always been a fan of judging by covers: I mean, if I’m going for a light-hearted holiday read, surely I’m far more likely to enjoy something that’s bright and quirky,perhaps with glittery letters, than something that attempts to sell itself with a bland close-up of a generic miserable looking woman in period dress. But it was only last time I looked at what I’d grabbed in the Waterstones 3 for 2 offer – The Elegance of A Hedgehog, We Are All Made of Glue, and The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society – that I realised how completely incapable I am of buying a book with an ordinary name.

So this Christmas, what bizarre titles will I be hoping to find under my tree? Well, I’ve had my eye on Kate Atkinson’s latest Jackson Brodie novel Started Early, Took My Dog for a while – I love the way she combines chilling murder stories with playful humour. Continuing with the animal theme, I can’t wait to get my hands on Sharon Creech’s Hate That Cat, a long-awaited companion to the unclassifiable poem/novella/diary Love That Dog. And I have to admit a slight curiosity for Coconut Unlimited by Nikesh Shukla, the story ofa group of private-school Asian teenagers who can’t quite pull off the gangster look. I didn’t say the titles had to be good; they just can’t be boring!

Maybe next time a relative asks what I want for Christmas, I should simply direct them to AbeBooks’ ‘Weird Book Room’. A brief glance at the titles on offer, from The Recently Deflowered Girl to Old Tractors and the Men Who Love Them, makes my current wish list look downright conventional.

CHRISTY: Regardless on your stance on the death of the author, writers’ letters are wonderfully fragmented collections of writings on art and craft, fame, and literary gossip, perfectly suited to the irregular reading life of a student. 2010 has been a good year for my obsession. The letters of two literary giants and Nobel winners on opposite sides of the Atlantic, Samuel Beckett and Saul Bellow, are constant attractions at Blackwell’s, as is Philip Larkin’s Letters to Monica and Iris Murdoch: a Writer at War.

Following introductions to Roberto Bolaño and Jorge Luis Borges, I’ve developed a taste for Spanish literature. Javier Marias’ Your Face Tomorrow trilogy – which James Lasdun has called ‘a work of supreme lunacy’ in the vein of Cervantes and Sterne – has won both attention and praise. Marias, who lectured in Spanish literature and translation at Oxford in the 1980s, used the city to serve as a backdrop for his novel All Souls, and I’m interested in the possibilities of his fusion of ‘Spanishness’ and ‘Englishness’. On a more adventurous note, the latest issue of Granta (#113) – attractively lemon-yellow, reminding us that the sun will come back eventually – is dedicated to the work of young and largely unfamiliar Spanish novelists. ¡Feliz Navidad!

Dear Santa… (part one)

0

Mary Renton (Section Editor)

What sort of a party is it?

A good one.

Where is it taking place?

The North Pole.

Who would you invite and why?

Santa, Louis Spence and the cast from The Only Way is Essex.

What would you wear as the host?

A onesy.

What are you serving?

Battenburg.

What’s on your Christmas wishlist?

Bunbag.

Emma Milner (Deputy Fashion Editor)

What sort of a party is it?

A Winter Woods-themed cocktail party.

Where is it taking place?

Inside a big, empty room which has been decorated with snow-topped trees, fairy lights, holly, ivy, twigs and other festive sylvan features. If an ice bar and pine cone fire don’t suffice, then a projection of the Planet Earth episode Seasonal Forests would be playing to really make sure everyone realised it was set in the woods.

Who would you invite, and why?

David Attenborough. Obviously. Giles Deacon for his Bambi dress, Muicia Prada for her ‘fruity, floral and woody’ perfumes, Alexander McQueen for his numerous enchanted woodland runway shows. Friends and family and the usual woodland folk.

What would you wear as the host?

A silver lame maxi dress (pretty icy looking eh) with an ivy headdress.

What are you serving?

Christmas log! Hog roast, game pie, woodland mushroom risotto, pigs in blankets, roast chestnuts and black forest gateau. Winter pimms, mulled cider and wine.

What’s on your Christmas wishlist?

Getting my camera fixed.

Laura Butterfield (Deputy Editor)

What sort of a party is it?

On first impression it would look like a classy affair, the kind of event with cheese on sticks, countered by copious amounts of free alcohol and descending into Oxford’s finest Friday night establishment on a Friday night, by name and by nature – Wahoo.

Where is it taking place?

I’m going to say New York, the Upper East Side obviously. All the prestige and drama of a Gossip Girl party. Nothing says festive spirit like a bitch fight and a love triangle.

Who would you invite and why?

Karl Lagerfeld for a dash of the inspirational bizarre, Oscar Wilde for witty banter and general debauchery, Nigella Lawson because she is a goddess and One Direction because it’s my party and I can have whoever I want. Even if it’s wrong.

What would you wear as the host?

Oooh at the moment, probably something floor length and sparkly by Elie Saab – my favourite from the couture offerings for A/W 2010.

What are you serving?

Cheese. As the main ingredient to everything.

What’s on your Christmas wishlist?

Lady GaGa’s wardrobe – just for jokes and bop costumes. Honest.

Review: The Sound of Music

We all search for them, even if we might not accept it.
We certainly miss them. And in a cold and dark December night we might even pay for them…

I am talking about emotions, feelgood ones, the kind of emotions you will only get from a perfect night at the theatre with a musical.
How about a classic one? A show where you sing along knowing all the lyrics by heart? Songs such as Do-re-mi, My Favourite Things, The Sound of Music will, I am sure, ring a bell or two.

This production was originally written by Rodgers and Hammerstein and was then adapted into the famous 1965 film with Julie Andrews. Let’s indulge in an unnecessary synopsis of the plot: Maria is to become a nun, but seems to be unfit for the role, and so she is sent to work as governess to the seven children of the naval officer Captain Georg Von Trapp. Thanks to her singing skills, joyful character and utter kindness, Maria conquers the whole family, including the captain. Then comes adventure, love, and, after a few bumps on the road, the inevitable happy ending to the strains of nuns singing. Of course music and the power it nurtures lie at the core of this show, for it is thanks to music that Maria and the Captain discover and face their feelings for each other. It is thanks to music once again that they escape from the Nazis towards the end.

Everything you can think of as entertaining is concentrated in this show: colourful sets and costumes, cheerful and straight forward acting and most of all clear and crisp singing from Maria (Connie Fisher and Philippa Buxton) and the rest of the cast.

In this magical world of music hall glossiness everything seems to work, the relationships are one-dimensional and surprisingly easy, everyone believes in feelings of love and righteousness. Life is simply “a white page to write on” as the song Sixteen going on Seventeen optimistically states. Whether or not you believe in such a rosy vision of life is not the question, it is more about indulging for a few hours, and really, what harm can it do, a little fairy tale in the wintery hour of the year?

Oxford’s Chancellor and Jesus Principal debate fees rise in House of Lords

0

Lord Patten, the Chancellor of Oxford University, has spoken out in the House of Lords in favour of trebling tuition fees.

He attacked Lord Krebs, the principal of Jesus College, over his opposition to the rise, calling Lord Krebs’ speech “a triumph of hope over experience”. The Conservative peer said that he had been “for twenty years a passionate believer in a bigger contribution by students to their education.”

Patten stated, “We know from the experience of the past forty years that the taxpayer will not provide the money [for higher education], so the only revenue stream that is left is the student.”

The Chancellor was defending the government’s controversial proposed changes to higher education, which passed last Thursday in the House of Commons with a majority of only twenty-one. Labour party peers had tabled an amendment, which would require the government to rethink the reforms.

The Chancellor’s comments came immediately after those of Lord Krebs, the Principal of Jesus College and crossbench peer, who had opposed the increase in fees.

Krebs commented that he had changed his mind on the issue of raising the tuition fee cap. He said that conversations with students at Oxford lead him to believe that the rise in debt will deter the poorest students from participating in higher education.

He told the House, “The proposals are not justified and fair. They do not make the funding of universities more sustainable. We do not understand the consequences.”

The amendment failed to pass in the House of Lords. Tuition fees are expected to rise to £9,000 in 2012 for most universities in England.

Lord Patten’s comments this week come in the wake of concerted opposition to higher fees from Oxford students, which has included sit-ins at the Council Offices and Radcliffe Camera.

Review: Of Gods and Men

0

The subject of faith should really be incompatible with cinema. The internal, silent struggles of religious men are seemingly completely at odds with visual excitement or insight, while a profound topic can often be dealt with all too flippantly or resolved far too tritely when presented on celluloid. Yet with Of Gods and Men, director Xavier Beauvois has shown that little needs to be said in order to portray compellingly the Manichean struggle between mortality and immortality. It is a film concerned largely with indecision, as psychological and spiritual turmoil are emblazoned painfully across the lined, ancient faces of its ensemble cast, and is a testament to the mantra that less is undoubtedly more.

Set in an Algerian monastery in the Atlas mountains, the film patiently shows us the ascetic, exacting existences of the seven monks who live there. For the first half an hour, the camera merely follows the monks as they go about their daily rituals – praying, bee-keeping, reading, ploughing the fields – and avoids any obvious or forced drama. These are men whose lives are lived at a slower, more considered pace, and Beauvois never allows his film to out-run its subjects. Indeed, the camera rarely moves, while there is no soundtrack or incidental music.

Yet rather than boring its audience, this artistic minimalism and reserve pay off greatly. From the first shot, there is an invaluable sense of authenticity being created, while this is aided by the impressively naturalistic performances of the central cast and an intelligently restrained script. Exposition is never indulged in, as the film shows rather than tells.

Soon, conflict arrives in the form of Islamic extremism. Villagers are being threatened and occasionally murdered, while in one particularly traumatic scene, an entire group of Croatian workers have their throats slit, with Beauvois dislodging the camera from its previously static position to lend the moment a sense of documentary-like realism. This violence that explodes so unexpectedly – and briefly – is completely at odds with the innocent, peaceful existence within the monastery, and is thus all the more effective. With the terrorists as a growing threat to the village and the monastery, the monks struggle to decide whether to return to France or remain where they are, and it is this dilemma that is the main focus of the film.

A great deal of Of Gods and Men is taken up by the silent prayers of the monks, and it is these scenes that are perhaps the most gripping and tragic of the film. The camera watches as men wordlessly kneel, heads bowed, and lingers as the silence gets louder and louder. They pray to an unresponsive, unsympathetic darkness, and Beauvois never hints at any divine presence or revelation, thus introducing an element of tragedy in their devotion. Indeed, the monks themselves acknowledge this fear, with one of the youngest brothers tearfully admitting, ‘I pray and I hear nothing.’

Yet despite examining faith in great depth, this is not a film concerned with the existence of God. Instead, its focus lies with brotherhood, friendship and love, and it deals with these subjects in a moving, subtle way. Its approach to these themes is one of sober maturity and patience, with only the ‘last supper’ scene indulging in anything approaching sentimentality (though by this point, Beauvois has undoubtedly earned the right to do so). Yet despite – or perhaps because of – such reserve in its story-telling, one cannot help but be gripped as time rapidly begins to run out for the monks, and the audience feels increasingly trapped within the confines of the monastery. With the internal struggles of each character etched onto their weathered faces, their dilemma becomes utterly compelling, while their struggle with faith is both fascinating and familiar. In its approach to religious faith, extremism, conflict and brotherhood, it is difficult to think of a film more profoundly relevant to the times in which we live.

The name’s Mili-Bond

0

In 1944, a young Ian Fleming remarked: “I am going to write the spy story to end all spy stories.”

He probably didn’t say anything about parliamentary sketches.

So.

* * *

Ed Mili-Bond came through the padded door and shut it behind him. He walked over to the chair across the desk from M and sat down.

“Morning, 007.”

“Good morning, sir.”

There was silence in the room apart from the far-off din of undergraduates getting trampled in a cavalry charge. Smoke rose in slow spirals from a freshly extinguished cigarette. Mili-Bond had not been in M’s office since his promotion to double-o status. He had been forced to disappear for several agonizing months after his disastrous last mission.

The Service had been thrown into turmoil after agent Brown failed to recruit the highly valuable asset known as agent Yellow, an Oxford man with a talent for languages and a flair for deception. Mili-Bond had conceived an instant dislike for him, and his suspicions were confirmed when agent Yellow, along with his entire spy ring, defected to the enemy. Rumours later abounded that Yellow’s organization had long been infiltrated by the soviets, including a pair of agents calling themselves the “Cheeky Girls.” This defection was a catastrophe for the Service, and caused agent Brown to take his own life. “The pathetic coward,” thought Mili-Bond, slowly extracting a cigarette ringed with three gold bands from its silver case.

Mili-Bond sat back and let the smoke from his own personal blend of tobacco fill his lungs. He looked into M’s cold, battleship grey eyes.

“Why I am I here?”

“You’re here because you’re a double-o. I can count on your willingness to take on any mission, no matter how dangerous.”

Mili-Bond paused. “Double-o”. He was still getting used to the new designation. He had earned it on his most recent assignment: a simple assassination, but one which had gone horribly wrong. Mili-Bond had been instructed to kill agent 006, a leading officer in the Service whose closeness to ex-agent Tony had come to be seen as a liability. M had suspected that it was only a matter of time before the enemy would be able to turn 006, if they hadn’t already.

Mili-Bond and 006 had shared very similar upbringings: both had experienced the loss of a parent, both had been bullied at school. Throughout their years in the Service they had been like brothers. Mili-Bond had found the job easy, though, and relished the first use of his silenced PPK, putting two holes cleanly through his companion’s forehead. He remembered it now, and felt nothing. “Double-o”.

“Now listen, 007. This mission is suicide. We expect your chances of survival to be minimal, at best.”

It’s good to be back, thought Mili-Bond.

“We need you to take out agent Yellow’s men, who have somehow managed to infiltrate government, and dispatch any enemy agents you come across. Reliable sources have informed me that we are also dealing with a highly dangerous organization calling itself “the Bullingdon Club”. A lot of good men died to get this information, Mili-Bond. See that you get our agents back into Westminster.”

“Yes, sir.”

Mili-Bond stood up and turned to the door. He took his hat from the stand, and reached for the handle.

“Oh, and Mili-Bond –”

“Yes, sir?”

“It was nice knowing you. Give your regards to Miss Moneypenny on the way out.”

* * *

Q’s workshop was deep in the bowels of MI6. Mili-Bond entered and walked to the far wall, where a man in a lab-coat stood hunched over a microscope. The room was empty, save for a few cardboard boxes. There was a stale smell, like a damp garage.

“What have you got for me this time, Q?”

“I beg your pardon?” said the major, irritated.

“Gadgets? Cars? You know.”

Q murmured something and reached under a table. He pulled out a rather old looking briefcase and brushed the dust off it.

“Here.”

Mili-Bond tried to hide his disappointment. There was an Aston Martin waiting for him last time. Oh well, he thought: a new gadget is still a new gadget.

“So what would happen if I press these like this…”

Mili-Bond put his thumbs up against the clasp of the briefcase, as though to open it. He looked up at Q for a reaction. Q looked back.

“It’s a briefcase, 007.”

“It doesn’t explode?”

“No.”

“So it’s stuffed with gold sovereigns? A hidden flamethrower, maybe?”

“It’s empty.”

Mili-Bond looked confused.

“What does it do?”

“‘Do’, Mr. Mili-Bond? This department has had an 80 percent budget cut. You are to take that empty briefcase and fill it with ideas. The Service needs you.”

* * *

Mili-Bond walked to the phone box across the square and picked up the receiver. His recently-fired pistol felt warm against his chest. He dialled the number for M’s office and calmly told Moneypenny to put him through.

“The job is done. The bitch is dead.”

“Ah, excellent work 007. I shall start the preparations for Baroness Thatcher’s state funeral immediately.”

How to fill your Oxford drama vac-uum

0

Staying up in a desperate attempt to get some work done before Christmas takes over? Helping at interviews? Just can’t quite let go?

If the prospect of another evening in the library doesn’t appeal, fear not. Oxford’s drama scene doesn’t stop for the holiday, as the pros take over where the students leave off. Here’s what’s on in Oxford over the vacation- there are treats a-plenty in store.

Cinderella
Oxford Playhouse, until January 16

De-stress and rediscover your childhood with the Playhouse’s annual panto, which the Oxford Mail calls “the Playhouse’s best ever show”. With all the booing, hissing, cross-dressing and “he’s behind you”-ing that you expect, there are also touches for adults including some gentle political satire and an Eminem-style rap. Two live ponies put the icing on the foam pie. You’ll leave with a smile on your face, something that surely can’t be said often of the library.

The Sound of Music
New Theatre, until January 2

Fresh from the West End, this critically acclaimed touring production stars Connie Fisher, winner of the BBC talent show “How do you solve a problem like Maria?” alongside Michael Praed and Marilyn Hill Smith, and a troupe of all-singing all-dancing Von Trapp children. Packed full of classic songs and a touching, fast-moving plot, this is a definite must-see, though whether the play can live up to the heights of the classic film, with its beautiful Austrian scenery and more extended dialogue, is a subject for debate. Catch it while you can, as these are Fisher’s last performances as Maria after four years in the role.

Travesties, by Tom Stoppard
Simpkins Lee Theatre, LMH, until December 19

Based on historical reality, as James Joyce, Lenin and artist Tristan Tzara live in Zurich during the First World War. Joyce recruits a minor British consular official to act in a production of The Importance of Being Earnest, who promptly sues Joyce for the cost of a pair of trousers, and is sued in return for slander. Called by director Collin MacNee “a multi-layered knickerbocker glory of a comic confection”, it’s a fast-paced comedy with questions of the meaning of art and revolution at its centre, conveyed with characteristic Stoppard wit and sublimity.

Bath Time
BT, until December 19

If you’re still full of worldly cares after the pantomime, regress even further into your youth and check out this show, which claims to “celebrate in words, music, magic and puppets the games we all play in the bath.” It’s aimed at 2-5 year olds, but don’t let that put you off if it sounds like your cup of tea. Bubbles and rubber ducks guaranteed.

If this isn’t enough, London is only an hour away by train or coach. Pick of the capital’s copious Christmas fare is Derek Jacobi as King Lear at the Donmar Warehouse (until February 3)- but be warned, you may have to face early morning queues for day tickets and returns, as it’s sold out and tickets have gone for up to £500 on ebay. Tennessee Williams’ masterpiece The Glass Menagerie at the Young Vic (5* in the Independent) should be well worth seeing, as should Oscar Wilde’s An Ideal Husband at the Vaudeville Theatre.

Thank God for Silvio

0

Italy is widely acknowledged to be a political shitheap. Against spectacular competition, its politicians are the most corrupt on the Continent. In 2009 the Economist’s Democracy Index downgraded the erstwhile superpower from “full” to “flawed” democracy. Let’s be frank: Berlusconi is only the next in a long line of tyrants. There was Mussolini of course. But what about Giulio Andreotti? Five times prime minister, he was in the pocket of the mafia, and had neither the nation nor his party at his heart. Once told that power wears men out, he replied that power only wears out those who don’t have it. This was certainly true for Toto Riina, aka “The Beast”. This “boss of all the bosses” ran Sicily as a sort of military dictatorship as late as the 1980s. The government had to send in the army to dispatch him and his mafia cronies.

At least Berlusconi pretends to care about democracy. That was what December 14th’s vote of no confidence was all about. One of the incalculable reasons why Italian politics is so hectic is that the prime minister has to have the support of both houses of Parliament. A bit mad: imagine if our Prime Minister had to have the support of the Lords as well as the Commons. But remarkably, Berlusconi’s force of personality has kept a semblance of order. He won the vote in the Senate easily. It was the Chamber of Deputies- the more powerful and more democratic house- that proved the problem. There the vote was fabulously tight. 314 votes to 311. Two opposition members switched side at the last minute. That is most suspicious. I suspect they’d been bribed.

Berlusconi is in this position because he is a total bastard. Expunge from your mind all comparison with Britain. It couldn’t happen here. The man is a billionaire. He also controls most of the Italian television and newspaper networks. And he’s prime minister. But by far his most spectacular achievements are sexual. Berlusconi is 74 years old. But he is able to attend the birthday parties of 18 year old girls, appoint models to his cabinet and parliament, have sex with prostitutes in hotel bedrooms, and generally behave like BoJo on speed. Not since Augustus II of Saxony- who is believed to have fathered up to 382 illegitimate children- has Europe seen so voracious and shameless a womaniser.

This is part of the reason for the vote against him. But Berlusconi’s inept and brazen attempts to secure his own power have also played a part. Despite being more right-wing than almost any European leader, this was not good enough for his main coalition partners, the Lega Nord. Some of these people are neo-fascists. Most of them are just fascists. Anyway, when Berlusconi reneged on devolution pledges they were happy to break ranks. But Berlusconi is hoping to move away from a system of alliances and votes. He wants to amend the constitution to establish an American style executive presidency, with himself in the role. Given his current unpopularity that may not be possible. But as today’s vote shows, we haven’t seen anything near the last of this most wanton of premiers.

Playing your cards right

0

‘In simple terms I can see, hear and speak with people in the spirit world, as well as read people’s past and predict their futures. It still amazes me when I say it out loud!’ As self-professed ‘Britain’s best-loved psychic’, Sally Morgan holds herself with a confidence and self-belief that barely betrays a career of more than twenty years facing down sceptics and cynics of her ‘gift’. It’s only in the last 4 years her career has expanded stratospherically with TV programmes Sally Morgan: Star Psychic and Psychic Sally: On the Road, two books and a third on the way in 2011, a nationwide tour and even a documentary about her recent gastric band operation.

Today Sally has joined the steadily-growing ranks of TV psychics trying to satisfy the nation’s hunger for the paranormal and supernatural. Having done readings for the cream of ITV2’s Z-list and reality TV stars (Brian Dowling, Kym Marsh, Danny Dyer…), I have to admit I was a little shocked when she revealed her most distinguished client to have been Princess Diana.

‘I was her psychic for over four years but our relationship was strictly professional. I remember one Boxing Day whilst having a big family dinner the phone rang. I answered it and was amazed to hear Diana on the end of the line, apologising for disturbing me and my family, obviously I told her it was no problem. It was such a hilarious moment as my mum was doing the typical, “I mean who phones on Boxing Day…who is it?…who is it?!” and I was trying to mime to her, whilst listening intently, “It’s the princess, the Princess of Wales”. I think that is the only time I have broken off from a roast turkey! She was a remarkable woman whom I highly respected; I am honoured to have known her.’

Perhaps it’s the earnestness and honesty in Sally’s words that have earned her that coveted title of ‘Britain’s best-loved psychic’ and the trust of the ‘people’s princess’, but I’d be more inclined to say it’s that she seems a lot less mad than some of the other psychics on the scene. There’s a big difference, she notes, between the genuine ones and the ones who know how to work an audience.

‘For me it is about validation. If they make a connection with you, if they give you information about your life that they could not have known, if they give you validation that they are indeed speaking to a relative or loved one in spirit then you have to just trust your instinct.’ I’m a little wary myself of Sally’s ‘gift’. I am a card-carrying cynic and hardly the first to ask Sally about the ethics of making money out of the gullible who are simply searching for reassurance and the last chance to say goodbye to a loved one.

Her technique is described by sceptics as ‘cold reading’, a term used (mainly pejoratively) for the throwing out of common words, names and images to be seized upon by a (usually already believing) sitter and made to ‘fit’ their life. Inevitably her controversial career choice has led to her being brandished by cynics as a phony and a fake, playing on the emotions of the grieving and the desperate. Indeed her £1.50 a minute ‘live psychic readings’ with hand-picked clairvoyants and her equally priced ‘psychic texts’ seem only to be fuelling the fire for her cynics.

Nevertheless, Sally is quick to justify the price she slaps on her gift: ‘From seeing me on TV, you may think that my life looks glamorous, but I still have bills to pay and mouths to feed like the next person. I would be unable to dedicate so much of my life to sharing my gift if I was unable to survive. I am genuine and it is people’s prerogative whether they want to spend their money to come and see me. The way I see it there is no difference to paying to get your hair done, or buying a new pair of shows; if it makes you feel better about yourself then it is an investment.’

I’m stunned for a moment by the forthrightness with which Sally talks about her ‘career’, for Sally has managed to turn a gift that she discovered at the age of 4 into a lucrative and ever-expanding business. ‘The first “experience” I remember clearly was when I was four years old. I was at nursery and I asked my teacher why my granddad couldn’t be with me. My teacher told me that no-one was allowed their granddad in the class with them and then I pointed at a girl in my class and asked why she was allowed. I could see as clear as day an old man dressed in a full length coat stood next to this girl.

‘The teacher asked me where this man was and so I went right up to him and pointed. The man smiled at me and then just disappeared. No one else in the room saw him.’ Nowadays, it still seems like Sally is trying to get her head around the idea of contacting spirits, ‘as bizarre as it sounds it is like putting a plug in a socket! Just before I go on stage I allow myself to open up to spirit world and suddenly I connect. When I am on stage there are many ways in which people in spirit present themselves to me; sometimes I can just hear them, other times I can see them and occasional my body will act out their characteristics. Messages can often be difficult to pick up and I almost have to sieve through what I am hearing until I can make a strong link. A good way to describe it is to imagine playing ten different radio stations at the same time and trying to just focus on one of them – it’s not easy and requires a lot of concentration and trust. I trust what is being said to me and never interpret.’

Surely she must have a considerable responsibility when channelling the information she receives? ‘I don’t believe that I have the right to edit the information I receive and therefore I generally speak as I hear. There have been a few times over the years where a reading has been particular distressing for me and the person in the audience.’

Sally, with her disarmingly warm personality, genuinely seems like she wants to help people. ‘Even now at the age of 59 and having years of experience I find my gift incredible; I don’t think I will ever fully understand how I can do what I do. Forming a connection between a person and their loved one in spirit is magical. Being able to make that bond with spirit and giving validation to the individual in front fills me with so much joy. I have helped and comforted thousands of people over the years and for that I am forever grateful.’ It’s difficult not to be impressed by her sincerity.

She’s a wily businesswoman, for sure, and she hasn’t missed a trick in charging for the insight of one of her readings, but there’s something very genuine about Sally’s desire to comfort people. I’m not quite as convinced as Sally about the authenticity of her business however; ‘mediumship has gained approval and acceptance in the last decade,’ she insists. Surely she’s got a lot of work on her hands if she’s going to convince the whole world she’s the real deal, hasn’t she? ‘I’m getting a bit fed up with qualifying what I do and so instead of trying to prove my ability I simply ask the sceptics to prove to me that there is no afterlife; prove that I am in-fact mad! I’m still an ordinary person, a wife, mother and grandmother. To be honest I just want to share my experiences of the spirit world and show people that although my gift is bizarre it is amazing too.’

Sally is currently touring the country until November 2011. For dates and venues, check her website: www.sallymorgan.tv

The price of truth – an interview with Oliver August

We all claim to be after truth. But sometimes real truth comes at a price that few have the strength or integrity to pay. The distinguished foreign correspondent Oliver August shows Cherwell the twilight side of international journalism.