Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Blog Page 1899

Oxford Tube in motorway crash

0

Seventeen people were rushed to hospital after an Oxford Tube coach met with a road accident on Saturday night.

The coach overturned as it was leaving the motorway on its way to Oxford from London. No other vehicles appear to have been involved.

Stagecoach, the company that runs the Oxford Tube service, commented, “The coach, which had 34 passengers on board, is understood to have gone through a barrier and ended up on its side.”

Thames Valley police have confirmed that most of the passengers taken to hospital have since been discharged, although two passengers remain in Oxford’s John Radcliffe hospital with severe injuries. It is uncertain whether any of the passengers were students.

Stagecoach commented, “safety is our absolute priority. We have operated the Oxford Tube since 1987 and we have never had an incident of this particular nature before. Our immediate thoughts are with those who have been injured in the accident.”

The company has said that it will be carrying out its own internal investigation and assisting the police with their inquiries into the accident.

Police have recovered the vehicle from the scene of the accident and have opened an inquiry into the causes of the incident. It has been suggested that the driver took the wrong exit when leaving the motorway.

The 24 hour London – Oxford Tube service is popular with students. The accident comes in the wake of a collision involving an Oxford varsity ski trip coach on the M25 last week.

Christmas poems: Clarissa Pabi reads "Dirty Old Man"

0

The text of the poem, along with some discussion with the poet, can be found in our Books and Exhibitions section at http://www.cherwell.org/sec/11.

The Battle of Westminster in pictures

0

Cherwell photographers were in Parliament Square to witness the events at Parliament Square as the government voted for a significant rise in university fees.

 

Protesters gather outside ULU to march to Parliament Square. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

Curious Londoners have a look at what’s going on in the streets. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

‘Tax the rich, don’t make ordinary people pay for the financial crisis’ – the message of the day. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

A policeman admits that he too opposes the rise in fees. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

The megaphones are out and the familiar slogans are heard again. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Even Oxford candidates skipped their interviews to participate in the protests. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

Red screams out from the crowd everywhere you look. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

‘No ifs, no buts, no education cuts!’ (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Construction workers are impressed by the energy of the protest. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

The police file in, getting themselves into position as they get ready to contain the protesters. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

Police start their kettling tactics. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Confusion reigns as students cannot get out of Parliament Square. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

Protesters hold an impromptu street rave to pass the time. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Some people tried to find exits out of Parliament Square and avoid being kettled. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

The mood tenses as students were waiting for the results of the vote. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

The police stand firm, trying to protect Parliament from angry protesters. (Alistair Smout)

 

 

Some students scale the police fencing out of boredom. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Protesters make themselves at home on the statues. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Statues join the students’ struggle. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Looking on to Parliament and hoping for the best. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Clashes between students and police were a frequent sight throughout the day. (Alistair Smout)

 

 

Many people kept their faces covered, to avoid the cold and the watchful gaze of authority. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

The vote passes and students start building bonfires… (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

… and burning benches or anything they can lay their hands on. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Students grow more and more restless as the day went on. Some even pose for photos in front of damaged police vans. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

A disillusioned student. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

As night falls things get completely out of control. (Sophie Balfour-Lynn)

 

 

At 7 o’clock, people are finally allowed to leave the square, one by one, being filmed as they left. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

As the night came, some people headed off to Oxford Street to continue the protest. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

People’s moods are not at a high point after the result of the vote. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Most people call it a day and try to use the vandalised telephone boxes to call home while the protest continued on Oxford Street. (Jessica Goodman)

 

 

Who knows what will happen next… (Jessica Goodman)

The X3 protests

0

Fancy yourself as a photographer?

Want your photographs from around and about Oxford seen by the thousands of people who visit the Cherwell website every day?

If so, why not send a few of your snaps into [email protected]?


ImageShack.us
http://img137.imageshack.us/i/1themarchprotestersgath.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img251.imageshack.us/i/sgoingoninthestreetsjes.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img152.imageshack.us/i/wasthemessageofthedayso.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img258.imageshack.us/i/31alliespolicemanadmits.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img684.imageshack.us/i/4themegaphoesareoutandt.jpg/

Uploaded with ImageShack.ushttp://img574.imageshack.us/i/41evenoxfordcandidatess.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img251.imageshack.us/i/42redseemedtobethecolou.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img338.imageshack.us/i/5peoplechantingthenowfa.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img403.imageshack.us/i/6constructionworkerswer.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img262.imageshack.us/i/7thepolicefileingetting.jpg/

Uploaded with ImageShack.ushttp://img27.imageshack.us/i/8policestarttheirkettli.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img502.imageshack.us/i/81studentsgetconfusedas.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img219.imageshack.us/i/9protestorsdancingatani.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img9.imageshack.us/i/11somepeopletriedtofind.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img42.imageshack.us/i/12jgthemoodwastenseasst.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img33.imageshack.us/i/121thepolicewerereallyt.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img697.imageshack.us/i/122somestudentsclimbedp.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img820.imageshack.us/i/122protestersmadethemse.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img814.imageshack.us/i/fightjessicagoodman.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img227.imageshack.us/i/13lookingontoparliament.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img51.imageshack.us/i/131studentsandpolicecla.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img443.imageshack.us/i/14manypeoplekepttheirfa.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img263.imageshack.us/i/14thevotepassesandstude.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img196.imageshack.us/i/15andburningbenchesthey.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img577.imageshack.us/i/17studentsstartedtogetv.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img818.imageshack.us/i/18disillusionwiththecoa.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img502.imageshack.us/i/19asnightfallsthingsget.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img704.imageshack.us/i/clockandpeoplewerefinal.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img403.imageshack.us/i/21nightfellandsomepeopl.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img821.imageshack.us/i/smoodswerenotatahighpoi.jpg/

ImageShack.ushttp://img529.imageshack.us/i/24somecalleditadayandtr.jpg/

Brasenose Principal to retire

0

The Principal of Brasenose College, Professor Roger Cashmore, whose use of expenses was recently questioned, is to retire at the end of this academic year.

Cashmore was the subject of national media attention when, in May this year, a report leaked to Cherwell suggested he and his wife had misused college travel expenses.

Following this, a source claimed in October, that the Governing Body of Brasenose had passed a motion of no confidence against him.

The 66 year old has been on research leave since October, with Professor Alan Bowman acting as Principal.

According to a statement issued by the college, the experimental physicist plans to concentrate on his research projects which include work on the Large Hadron Collider and a recent appointment as Chairman of the UK Atomic Energy Authority.

Cashmore, a Cambridge and Balliol alumnus, has been Principal of Brasenose since 2002 and oversaw celebrations to mark the College’s quincentenary last year, including a visit by the Queen.

Why I wasn’t protesting on Thursday

0

Do you ever feel out of step with your own age group? I do. Almost all the time, in fact. Take music: to me, dubstep sounds like one of those old-fashioned modems exploding to the accompaniment of a gut-thumping bass-line that has the uncomfortable effect of making you want to scratch your Adam’s apple from the inside. Also, why call it dubstep? It goes wub. “Dubstep” sounds like a dance craze from the 1940s. Music is only the start, however. I’d rather have a double espresso than a red bull; a dry martini over a strawberry daiquiri; Newsnight instead of Glee. You can imagine how I felt, then, when there emerged yet another way for me to feel out of touch with my peers.

I confess I didn’t protest on Thursday, the day of the tuition fees vote. I’m probably not alone in this. Nevertheless, I wish to defend my position. I absolutely hate noisy crowds. Politics and ideology aside, the idea of being in an over-excited group of people chanting slogans (many of which don’t even scan) appeals to me about as much as the thought of listening to dub-step.

In fact, I imagine going on a demo would be much like going to a music festival, though of course I can’t be sure, since due to my aforementioned dislike of noisy crowds I have experienced neither demo nor festival. I’m not claustrophobic, just slightly misanthropic. I can cope with an orderly queue, and I have no problem being in a packed lift or train carriage, because in this country there are strict regulations about those things: do not talk, do not make eye contact etc.

A protest, however, is by its very nature chaotic. A structure of sorts is imposed by the route of the march, but the point of a protest is not to get from A to B, and, at any rate, no one ever sticks to the planned route.

In every way, protests are messy. Not my cup of tea, I’m afraid. Best let other people get on with it. They’d do a much better job of it than I ever could. If I were occupying the Rad Cam I would ask people to be quiet so that I could get some sleep. I would bring a folding chair and a book to a sit-in. On a march I would get annoyed if the people in front of me weren’t walking quickly enough.

Please don’t think, though, that I am opposed to protests in principle. On the contrary, I think they are terribly important. Every so often, in extreme cases, citizens need something more direct than the ballot box in order to register their disapproval. For this reason the right to protest is one that ought to be valued above almost all others, and should be considered nearly as important as the right to vote itself. With rights come certain responsibilities, however. As a vital channel of democracy, protesting should be afforded a great deal of respect, both by the protesters themselves and, crucially, by those in authority. Both groups seem to have forgotten this, though.

The effectiveness of the kind of demonstrating we have seen recently is only going to be damaged if people take it too far too regularly, and on too flimsy a pretext. Making students pay for degrees that they stand to benefit from is hardly an injustice of the severity to inspire a Mahatma Gandhi or a Martin Luther King. In fact it seems to have inspired the kind of people who get a kick from fighting authority purely for its own sake; in most people’s eyes the face of student activism is not Aaron Porter but the odious Charlie Gilmour.

Everyone agrees that education is a human right, but it is unreasonable and downright naive to argue that the principle of free education for all should extend to a situation where everybody who works for a living would be required to shoulder the entire burden of funding three year degree courses for a lucky few. The danger is that our generation will be remembered for fighting a battle of self interest. Go and ask a foreign student how much sympathy they have for the cause of “free” higher education (“free” is a misleading word: someone will have to pay). We live in a country where some people are illiterate into their teens. I am taught Latin and Greek by world experts. Why is it necessary for the taxpayer to foot the bill for my further development when schools in Britain fall so shockingly behind those of our neighbours?

I don’t understand why people like dubstep. This is a simple matter of personal preference. It is my firm belief, however, that our generation has made a mistake in choosing to fight the present cause. It may well be true that I would make a rubbish protester. Having said that, the point is not to enjoy yourself. I guess that’s what separates a truly worthwhile fight from an excuse for an anarchic day out. “Free” university is not an issue worth fighting for. That’s why I didn’t protest on Thursday. That, and the fact I was on the Varsity trip.

Why bother with Godard?

0

Jean-Luc Godard is one of those figures who has become preeminent by contributing to the creation of a whole new stereotype, that of pretentiously abstruse French films. Yet his fame is puzzling even to himself: “I’ll always wonder why I’m known, because nobody sees my movies. Well, almost nobody.” He and other directors such as François Truffaut and Claude Chabrol formed what is known as the Nouvelle Vague, a cinematographic movement lauded by some for its boldness and innovation and derided by others for its self-indulgence and esoterism. Yet, as more often than not, the paradigm case hardly fits the stereotype. Godard’s oeuvre is not simply an array of masterfully crafted but impenetrable films with odd narratives and odder characters; on the contrary, his films have a lot to teach us about cinema.

Godard is renowned for being a maverick who would do things exactly the way he wanted them, with little consideration for practical or even legal concerns. He would often film for only two hours a day, sometimes cancelling the whole shoot on the morning because he wasn’t feeling inspired. To evade the Kafkaesque grasp of the French bureaucracy, he decided to record the sound during post-production, which meant that he didn’t have to comply with regulations concerning sound technicians. He even went as far as scrapping the entire script of À bout de souffle (1960) after he started to film and rewrote the dialogue on set.

This idiosyncratic approach extended to his style of directing, where Godard rejected all the narrative and cinematographic conventions of the time. His use of the jump cut in À bout de souffle is still cited as one of the most daring moves in the history of modern cinema. In a famous car scene, the two main protagonists, Michel Poiccard and Patricia Franchini (played by Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg respectively) are arguing whilst driving around Paris. The camera never leaves Seberg, and Godard occasionally leaves out bits of the footage in order to cut to the same shot later in time, a technique which is called jump cutting. (Type “Godard breathless car scene” into YouTube to see the scene.)

Consider how the directing of this scene differs from standard conventions. In Hollywood at the time, and to a large extent still today, if you wanted to show a conversation you would just film it with no pauses, alternating between both characters, i.e. using the shot/countershot technique. Alternatively, perhaps if you wanted to show tension between the characters, you would add some silence in between their lines. No need for jump cuts.

Both methods of directing and writing have their uses, but what Godard does show us that others fail to is a new perspective on cinema. By presenting us with a different way of putting a story to screen, he opens our eyes to how surprisingly formatted by convention mainstream films are. Watching a Godard film may at first seem odd, unnatural even, but once you realize what makes it so, you suddenly grasp precisely what other directors do to prevent that sensation.

So watching Godard – on top of being a pleasure in itself – is an education in the conventions of cinema. The most interesting part is that fifty years after the release of À bout de souffle and eighty years after Godard’s birth, you might think that these conventions would have changed. But the forms Godard was conscientiously going against have hardly altered. Some changes have been made to accommodate advances in technology, but the director’s basic tools, such as shot/countershot, persist.

Sri Lankans slam Union

0

The Oxford Union sparked outrage last week after cancelling a visit by the President of Sri Lanka at the eleventh hour. Mr Rajapaksa was due to address Union members on Thursday of eighth week on national reconstruction and reconciliation.

President Mahinda Rajapaksa had already arrived in the UK when the Union called off the talk, citing “security reasons”.

High levels of protest from pro-Tamil activists had been anticipated for weeks by Union officials and police. In a statement on their website, the Union said that “due to the sheer scale of the expected protests, we do not feel that the talk can reasonably and safely go ahead as planned”.

In spite of fears, the Thames Valley Police issued a statement saying they had developed “a comprehensive policing operation … to facilitate those who wished to protest peacefully as well as provide an appropriate level of security to the president and his entourage”.

Superintendent Amanda Pearson, Commander of the Oxford area, said that the talk would have clearly caused a disruption to the city centre of Oxford but that Thames Valley Police “did have plans in place to deal with, and facilitate, large numbers of people gathering”.

The decision has caught the attention of the Sri Lankan media, with some reports suggesting that the British High Commission had a hand in the cancellation. In a press conference in London, the Sri Lankan external affairs minister, Professor G.L. Peiris called it “a sign of Britain’s moral weakness”.

Minister for Media Keheliya Rambukwella called the incident “a scar on the Oxford Union and the British government”. The BBC reported this week that demonstrators tried to storm the British High Commission in Sri Lanka’s capital Colombo over the Tamil protests that took place in London during President Rajapaka’s visit.

The Oxford Union stated that it holds a politically neutral stance with regard to speakers and that “the decision was not made in relation to any aspect of Mr Rajapaksa’s political position”.

The Sri Lankan President was met upon arrival at London’s Heathrow airport by hundreds of Tamil Tiger protesters who condemned the Union’s decision to host the talk and this week, Sri Lanka were the subject of the latest Wikileaks cables as it emerged that a US envoy believed that President Rajapaksa bore responsibility for an alleged massacre of Tamils in May 2009.

Oxford Sri Lankan Society, who helped to organise the event, condemned the cancellation, calling it a “unilateral decision” taken by the then Union President James Kingston, and describing his conduct “as ‘highly unbecoming”.

The society has worked in conjunction with the Union on speaker events successfully in the past, and had confirmed twelve ambassadors, five diplomats and the Lord Mayor of Oxford as guests for the event.

Dilan Fernando, President of the Oxford Sri Lankan Society, said that “the most embarrassing thing was the way in which it was cancelled”. He emphasised that Mr Rajapaksa had travelled thousands of miles and claimed that the Union President had a duty to “honour his commitment”.

Mr Rajapaksa expressed regret at the cancellation of the visit, which would have made him the first head of state ever to address the Union twice. He first visited the Union in 2008, during the Sri Lankan Civil War between the government and Tamil separatist groups.

James Langman, the Union President for Hilary term, reportedly travelled to London to apologise in person for the decision, extending an invitation for Mr Rajapaksa to speak just a few days later, once Langman’s official term as president had begun.

The Sri Lankan President politely declined but said in a statement that he would “continue to seek venues in Britain and elsewhere where he can talk about his future vision for Sri Lanka”.

The Oxford Union insisted in its statement that “the decision was not taken lightly” and expressed “deep regret” for having to cancel the visit.

The Oxford Union has a history of inviting controversial figures to speak and emphasises that all views must have a platform. In 2007, the Union came under fire for inviting British National Party leader Nick Griffin and holocaust denier David Irving to speak at a free speech event.

Oxford Blues defy the odds at Twickenham

0

Oxford University notched up an unexpected 21-10 win at the Varsity Rugby Match yesterday.

The result marks only the second victory for Oxford in six years.

Having lost to Cambridge last year and endured a disappointing season thus far, the Oxford team were the underdogs in the buildup to the 129th game.

Two tries scored in the first half by Cheesman and Crozier, alongside the skilful kicking of fly half Charlie Marr, secured an impressive win for the Dark Blues.

Captain Nick Haydon told BBC Oxford, “This surpasses all my achievements. To represent Oxford University is a great honour, and to lead the side is a very special moment.”

On their website, the Oxford University Rugby Club described the match, which was attended by over 27,000 people, as “a dominant Oxford performance'”. Man of the Match was awarded to flanker Stan McKeen, who led Oxford’s back row throughout.

MPs back tuition fee increase amid protests

0

There were violent scenes in London yesterday as students demonstrated outside Parliament on the voting day for proposed tuition fee rises.

The initially peaceful protest escalated as MPs delayed voting on the proposals until the 5.30pm deadline and police used containment tactics to control the crowd.

According to the ambulance service, 37 people were injured and 22 arrested on the march, which started at noon on Malet Street near UCL, and made its way towards Parliament Square. A number of Oxford students were among the estimated 20,000 people present.

At around 2pm a standoff between a line of police and demonstrators trying to break through one side of Parliament Square resulted in policemen being chased as they tried to retreat. Shortly afterwards metal fencing on the south side of the square was ripped down and protestors flooded onto the grass.

Police armed with riot gear prevented the protestors from getting closer to Parliament. Missiles such as glass bottles and paint bombs were thrown at them from the crowd.

Although there were standoffs with the police in most corners of the square, there was a positive atmosphere at the centre as protesters lit bonfires, played music, and decorated statues and trees with banners and posters.

However, the mood of the day changed at around 3.30pm, when eight police on horseback charged at the crowd at the South West corner of the square, creating panic and fear.

The police advanced in lines on foot, using batons, whilst protestors used metal fencing to try and drive through the police barrier. The area was then “kettled” by police, and demonstrators were prevented from leaving the square, causing further panic.

Teddy Hall second year Frances Reed witnessed a petrol bomb being thrown at the police. She commented, “it was terrifying, it hit the crowd instead. The level of violence was unacceptable – in hindsight, if I’d known the protest was going to be hijacked by anarchists and idiots I wouldn’t have gone.

“I think the kettling was necessary after the petrol bomb, but there were people in the crowd younger than 15 who got trapped there. It actually looked like everyone was dispersing, but the police lined up with riot vans and pushed forward incredibly quickly and that was when things began to get really nasty. People were really frightened.”

However, some sympathised with the violent protestors. One second year Oxford student said, “I know people can be disillusioned by the violence [of the anarchists] but you have to admire them for sticking by their principles. More than any day since the Iraq war, today has shown how out of touch the people in government are, and how unhealthy this ‘Westminster’ style of democracy is.

“The idea that these people are ‘professional agitators,’ creating violence for violence’s sake, is extremely misleading. They are violent because of their anger at the political process in this country, and because they want something different.”

At around 5.45pm word spread that the vote on trebling university fees to £9,000 had taken place and passed with a majority of just 21 out of 649 standing MPs. MP for Oxford West Nicola Blackwood voted yes, and Andrew Smith of Oxford East voted no.

During the evening the windows of the Treasury were smashed, and in a smaller scale attack, so were two windows of the Supreme Court. However, the crowd seemed unimpressed with this action, calling the perpetrator a “dickhead”.

A breakaway group of protestors moved onto Trafalgar Square, where they attempted to set fire to a Christmas tree, and The Strand, where Topshop and other stores were attacked. The National Gallery was also occupied.

The windows of a car containing Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles were smashed and attacked with paint, drawing condemnation from the Prime Minister and police officials.

A member of the OxfordEducation Campaign, which has been responsible for organising protests in Oxford including the Radcliffe Camera occupation, commented, “it’s really sad that the press seem to have jumped on the violence and what happened to Prince Charles instead of yesterday’s real issues. [Attacking the Royal car] obviously wasn’t about fees and funding, they were shouting ‘off with their heads’, for God’s sake.

“Is it any wonder students are angry when the majority express ourselves through peaceful demonstration and we’re still treated like criminals and our views ignored?”

The proposals to raise fees have triggered a wave of student and school pupil protests, with a march last month leading to an attack on the Conservative headquarters in Millbank.

Dozens of university and school buildings across the country have been occupied by students, including sit-ins at Oxford council offices and university sites. Student union heads and protest organisers promised today that “December 9th is only the beginning.”