Saturday 12th July 2025
Blog Page 1939

Cherwell’s House Doctor

0

What’s the difference between separate tenancies, a joint tenancy, or a tenancy in only one person’s name?

Simon says: Separate tenancies are for bed-sits/rooms. A Joint tenancy is for a group of sharers and will be an Assured Shorthold Tenancy; this is the most common agreement for students and sharers. A tenancy in one person’s name could be for one person taking the tenancy along with “persons permitted to reside” This is not recommended for groups of sharers.

Cherwell says: There are lots of ins and outs of what type of tenancy to pick. All Cherwell advises is that you don’t let a parent be your landlord. Yes, you probably get to keep the house afterwards, but getting your friends to pay you rent is awkward to say the least, as if your mum ringing the house phone as you’re trying to get your house party on.

What are the key things to look for in the small print of a tenancy agreement?

Simon says:Joint & several; this means that all parties to the agreement, tenants and guarantors are all responsible for all parts of the agreement. This means if three of four pay the rent and the fourth doesn’t, the balance can be claimed from the three who have paid their share. Not great if you’ve got an unreliable friend.

TDS: The Tenancy Dispute Scheme; All deposits must be protected by the agent or landlord

Checkout fees: Is there a charge at the end of the tenancy for checking the property and is this lower if you leave the property well maintained.

Any other fees – make sure they are clearly stated. You don’t want to be charged an ‘undisclosed amount’.

Cherwell says: Like an exam paper question, just make sure you read it. Twice. When you’re not hungover.

What do you do if your landlord is refusing to refund part or all of a deposit, for a reason you dispute?

Simon says: The return of the damage deposit is the number one cause of dispute between landlords and tenants and the one which most frequently ends up being resolved by the courts. Firstly you should always arrange to walk around the property about a month before the end of the tenancy to ask what the landlord or agent expects to be done, especially before making bodged repairs or decoration. Speak to your agent if you have any queries. You should refer to your copy of the inventory and aim to return the property in the same condition as it was at the start. ‘Wear and tear’ is not a phrase that allows for cleaning or damage. If you really can not reach an agreement (in Oxford most normally do) on deductions, refer to your agreement for details on where your deposit is protected and how to instigate a dispute.

Cherwell says: If your landlord is refusing to refund part or all of the deposit and you disagree with his reason then you need to go all superhero on his ass and take some (legal) action.

Firstly, write to your landlord asking for the return of the deposit and reasons in writing as to why he is retaining it. Keep copies of any letters you send or receive, because you’ll need them if you have to take action in the county court. If you are not happy with the landlords response (or if he’s not so-politely ignoring you), you will need to seek advice about where to go for help either negotiating with the landlord or taking them to court.http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk is the best place to go to get yourself started.

Something has broken and our landlord is saying it’s not his problem or avoiding our calls. Where do we stand?

Simon says: If it is something that belongs to the landlord and has stopped working, the landlord should fix the item. Try other methods of contacting your landlord – email for example. If you still cannot reach your landlord, speak to the Environmental Health dept at the Council. If it is something that has broken through neglect or misuse, you should pay for the item to be fixed yourselves.

Cherwell says: Whatever tenancy agreement you have signed the landlord has a duty to carry out certain repairs. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 obliges a landlord to repair the structure and exterior of the premises. The Act also covers disrepair to the heating, water supply and toilet system. So, hot water, hot air and a flushing toilet are pretty much guaranteed, if you can get your landlord on the phone. Exploding boilers are always the landlords responsibility. The red wine stains on the carpet after your MENTAL houseparty are not. Ditto for the broken window that the awful rugby boy, who noone thinks is funny, smashed as some hilarious gag.

We have a mouse infestation, whose responsibility it is to deal with them?

Simon says: A common sense approach is best, mouse traps are very cheap and work well with a smear of Nutella or peanut butter but you can ask your agent or landlord who will usually contact a pest control company or the Council. Remember though if the cause is brought about by rubbish left by you, expect to be charged.

Cherwell says: Unless they’re the cute mice from Disney’s Cinderella that talk and help you get dressed in the morning, get rid of them as soon as possible. You will have to argue with the landlord about whose responsibility it is to deal with them – if they got in through a giant hole in the wall, then it’s probably the landlord’s fault. If you’ve had a pile of discarded cheese festering in your living room for the last month, it’s probably all on you. If you have rats, your local authority Environmental Health Department should come round and deal with the problem free of charge.

We want to leave a contract earlier than it permits, what happens now?

Simon says: It depends on your tenancy agreement. You should check whether it is for a fixed term, whether there is a break-clause. It is usually unlikely that you will be able to change the agreement; this is to protect you and means that the landlord can not change the terms half way through your tenancy. It is always worth asking your agent or landlord.

Cherwell says: If you want to leave a contract earlier than it permits, it is very difficult to do this without the agreement of the landlord. There are some very rare occasions when a tenant or a licencee has the right to leave early, regardless of the landlords wishes – but these are long and arduous to explain.

A friend has moved out and we’ve signed a ‘joint tenancy agreement’, what does this mean for the rest of us?

Your friend must continue to pay their share of the rent until a new agreement is signed by all the new parties, until that time the total monthly rent for the property still needs to be paid regardless of your friend moving out

Cherwell says: Never talk to them again. That is, unless they moved out because you are vile to live with, in which case, it probably won’t make a difference.

Creaming Spires

0

The Browne Review. No, I’m not still talking about anal sex. My homofriendual read that article last week and said it seriously put him off the poo chute for a while, and nobody wants that, so I’ll leave off the bumholio for a while. At least textually (boom boom). But yes, The Browne Review. You know what I’m talking about, the fact that university is going to cost a gazillion pounds and the only people who will be able to go are the large of teeth, the big of hair, the thick of skin – yes, YOU’VE GOT IT, the fabulously rich.

But if most people get sexually awakened in university these days (frigid bitches – cheeky fingers were pretty much on the curriculum in my secondary school) how will this affect sex? If you’re the only person milling around campus without a double-barrelled surname, second home in San Tropez or a braying tone of voice, what kind of nasty are you going to be doing? Well, we can assume first of all that after homoerotic goings on in their boarding schools, the He-Rahs will have a high pain tolerance and a tendency to associate sex with power. Standard.

The She-Rahs, on the other hand, will favour the girl-on-top, or the reverse cow-girl, because she hasn’t spent hours on that huge head of hair for nothing. Years of trophy wives have given her the gift of volume, and there’s no way she’s giving that up for easier access to the g-spot, yah? Don’t be so bladdy stupid. You povvo. One could argue that the picture I paint is not dissimilar from Oxford now, we have a disproportionately high Rah-ratio (rahtio?) despite equal opportunities/outreach/the fact that every Rah one meets seeming inexplicably retarded.

Perhaps that’s explained by the fact He and She-Rahs largely interbreed. They favour their own kind. You can hardly blame them. Imagine encountering a naked body not lightly tanned from a brief spell in Bermuda, imagine waking up on cotton-mix sheets (ew), imagine encountering a climactic cry, the vowels of which are not elongated. Nasty. Why pig out on burgers when there’s so much prime rib-eye steak wandering around Kukui these days? And it’s just going to become easier for them to avoid us sex-hungry, thin-haired, inferiorly educated losers when this Browne Review kicks in. University graduates will be the best-educated, most sexually satisfied people in the world. Suddenly I feel my natural political apathy subside. I could take part in a march later. Or I could just do a Browne Review of my own. And this time, I am talking about anal.

On your marks, get set

0

An event both highly regarded and ridiculously fun, this year’s swimming cuppers took place at Rosenblatt Pool in the Iffley Sports Complex. In this refreshingly cool and over-chlorinated venue, 15 college swim teams competed for points in eight events. Colleges racked up points depending on where their swimmers finished in each overall event. Oxford University Swim Club (OUSC) members, all outstanding athletes with toned swimmer bodies, organised the event and were only allowed to swim in the relays.
Impressive performances in the individual events included Thomas Bloomfield of Exeter in the men’s 100 IM and Alice Gatland of St. Catz who pulled off a stunning 31-second 50 freestyle. But the most remarkable of the individual races was the men’s 50 free, which required a time of 0:25.25 to win. Olivier Dudas of Magdalen took 1st place there.

The Magdalen relay team was out to dominate the men’s 4×25 freestyle and none were able to beat them. The women’s 4×25 freestyle relay race revealed a surprise when a St.Catz team finished a strong 1st. Placing Alice Gatland, winner of the 50 free, as anchor was a tactical manoeuvre unforeseen by the Magdalen women, who still managed to finish second.
As the scores were read off, it was no surprise when Magdalen finished with a first place record score of 162 points. St. Catz, due to its very strong women’s relay team, finished second with 67 points. Trinity, close behind, finished third with 57 points.

From the player’s mouth

0

JCR Women’s Football

New Women 3

Somerville Women 0

After Somerville 2nds rather humiliating 16-0 defeat last weekend, Somerville 1sts clearly had something to prove. Fearing the might of the New College squad just 3 leagues below them the Somerville Captain limited their availability to Saturday at the same time as the OUWAFC football training in a vindictive effort to remove half of New’s team.

New’s ten man squad was therefore dwarfed by a Somerville team that not only had subs but also a coach, a referee and a linesman in what was an unprecedented show of support from Some of an earlier agreement to play the match with reduced numbers on each side, Somerville’s captain was reluctant to make good this promise in person. Barely had 5 minutes been played when New College’s star winger-come-Mathematician, Amy Bond shouted in disgust that Somerville had 11 players on the pitch – turns out a maths degree is useful after all.

Any early bets would certainly have gone Somerville’s way as New found themselves severely under pressure for much of the first half. Only the safe hands of keeper Emily Benn and a tackle from Captain Robyn Parody, so good that even the referee mentioned it, kept New in the game.

A fantastic counter attack from New paid off as Meg Goulding opened the scoring for the visitors and tensions ran high as a clear handball from Somerville’s defence went unnoticed by the referee in an unambiguous attempt to even out some of the more questionable decisions from last weeks game.

New’s tenacity paid off when in the second half they were joined by eleventh player and lynchpin of the midfield Liz Betterbed. The chances kept coming for New as Somerville failed to mount a meaningful attack on goal. The final scoreline of 0-3 is further evidence that performance in the league means nothing when it comes to the unpredictability of the Cuppers competition.

Robyn Parody

Oxford Blues Rugby Friendly

Oxford Blues 17

Cardiff Blues 22

After disappointing fans with an opening fixture rout at the hands of a rampant London Wasps the onus was on Oxford to give an expectant crowd something to shout about. Athough maybe not quite as strong as London Wasps, Oxford still came up against a stern test in their welsh namesakes the Cardiff Blues.

The opening to the game was not quite as fluid as the opening fixture and the gulf in class not quite so obvious. Some scrappy midfield play and needless penalties led to the eventual exchange of kicks at goal. Cardiff made the breakthrough and scored the first try of the night midway through the first half, some quick passing moved the ball out to the wing and an excellent finish gave Cardiff some early breathing space. However, with the resultant conversion missed, Oxford still had a way back into the match before half time. Indeed they did just that just before the break with eventual man of the match Louis Mather scoring the opening try of the night for the Blues. This optimism was short lived and another quick score from Cardiff saw them lead 14-10 at the break.

The second half did not see quite so much action; the two teams were fairly evenly matched. Oxford Blues scored the early try, but a penalty from Cardiff meant that the scores were level at 17-17 going into the last five minutes. Unfortunately for Blues a late lapse in concentration led to a score which put a dampener on a much improved performance as Cardiff ran out eventual winners 22-17.

Cherwell Sport

JCR Football Premier Division

Christ Church 4

St Hilda’s 1

Premier Division champions Christ Church defeated a resilient St. Hilda’s team 4-1 to progress to the second round of Cuppers. Hilda’s play in college football’s lowest tier, but impressively overcame the gulf in league positions to hold the favourites at half-time, 1-1.

ChCh took a lead after 25 minutes, fresher and new Blue Zander Whitehurst capitalizing on some confused defending: after their goal, the home side settled into a skilful rhythm, working the wings and creating plenty of scoring opportunities. Captain Chris Wallwork’s new-look 4-3-3 was, in his own humble words, ‘a tactical masterclass of a decision’. Complacency began to creep, though, and Hilda’s tenacious perseverance was rewarded; an incisive through-ball split a usually watertight defence, assisting a neat finish that deftly beat the Christ Church goalkeeper.

Anything can happen in the unpredictable maelstrom of a Cuppers match, and the 2nd half began with a palpable shift of momentum: Hilda’s attacked with pace and power for a dominant 5 minute period before ChCh were able to reassert their superiority. The span in quality shone through as legs soon tired, with Whitehurst’s second goal, a low drive, killing off the Hilda’s comeback. The House added a further two goals as the match wore away, one from a stunning passage of possession at the hour mark, and another from a clear, indisputable penalty.

Remarkably for a team that has been such a dominant powerhouse in recent times, this was Christ Church’s first Cuppers victory in 3 years. Richard Bath, a stalwart 4th year midfielder, is the lone witness from that last win: ‘To triumph in another Cuppers game means the world to me, it really does. A deep run in the competition before my retirement would cap a great career. We’ve won the league, and now we’re hungry to taste success again.’

Scott Mody

A game of two halves is better than one

0

The decision taken by fellows of St Hilda’s College to end their 113 year stint as an all-female college was not one that was taken lightly, or one that passed without comment. Between 1993 – when Somerville first admitted men – and 2006, when the governing body at Hilda’s voted in favour of the same decision, the college existed as a curious entity in the Oxford collegiate system: the only all-girls club in town.

St Hilda’s has always enjoyed a reputation as an extroverted college. Their ‘work hard, play hard’ ethos is one of the main facets of college life that is emphasised to potential applicants, but how much did this change with the decision to admit men from October 2008? Over half of St Hilda’s undergraduates questioned in 2006 believed that accepting a mixed cohort would be a mistake, but have boys adversely affected the college? Hilda’s, unsurprisingly, has traditionally enjoyed a strong reputation in women’s sport, has this been diminished over the last two years? And finally, how are those pioneering males getting on? Is their participation in sport hindered by their limited numbers?
Fortunately, it seems that sporting life has, if anything, benefitted from the acceptance of men. The men themselves, benefitting no doubt from camaraderie and stoicism in the face of adversity, have excelled in almost every sport. Will Pembroke, JCR Sports Rep, told Cherwell that at times it can be frustrating playing for St Hilda’s. Despite winning their football division without dropping a point, Pembroke remarked on the struggle to get enough players for all the various teams and his annoyance at forfeiting matches, even against teams which Hilda’s were sure to beat. He went on to add that, in his opinion, the reputation of St Hilda’s as a all-females college, may have a negative impact on prospective applicants as they believe the college has no male sports teams.

When quizzed on the affect of men on the performance of the women’s teams, the answers were both uniform and positive. Despite the reduction of the pool from which to select female athletes and the slide of the college’s women’s 1st VIII six places down the women’s divisions in the last two Summer Eights, all those questioned believed that having men at the college had increased sporting participation. Indeed, Will Pembroke, men’s 1st XI captain, is adamant in his belief that the capacity to share equipment and coaching has made both men’s and women’s teams stronger. The reason behind the decision of those in charge at St Hilda’s to go mixed was to try and restore a college they thought was flagging in comparison to its rivals. If this was their aim then, in sporting terms at least, it seems they have been largely successful.

Intoxficated

0

This week’s article is about buying good, cheap wine. Don’t worry, ponciness will be kept to a minimum – life’s too short and in truth I’d probably just be shown up. For the record, there is no ‘objective’ hierarchy of wines, and the cost of a wine certainly does not equate to its tastiness. I’d much rather be told to help myself to wine from of a carton that have someone pour me a tiny glass of Chateaux Niche and then expect me to make appreciating noises about it for five minutes. In those situations it’s only a matter of time before he’ll go “hmm…yes, it was very reasonable – meant to cost 120 but I got it for 85.” An awful lot of these wine snobs have only a veneer of social grace and decency: they think etiquette a matter of form rather than substance, and at heart are only into wine to show off.

There is, however, a middle ground to be found between the good stuff and Lambrini. It takes initial expenditure though. The trick is to buy in bulk. Oddbins do 20% off any mixed dozen. Back when I lived in college, four of used to gang together and buy a dozen bottles of the Portuguese red Quinta de Bons-Ventos, which worked out at £5.19 a bottle. I think one of the attendants recommended it to us. Don’t be afraid to ask for their favourites –most of them are happy to show off. Still better deals can be found on the Internet: winesdirect.co.uk is a comparison site that offers free vouchers for epic online discounts. My favourite is with the wine merchant Laithwaites – £40 off if you spend £100 for first time buyers. There are four (the same four) in our house so that’s saved us £160 or forty £4 bottles. One final tip is that German wines have the best quality to price ratio, though are slightly less alcoholic. An £8 Mosel Reisling will be delicious. And remember that we’re lucky enough to be in institutions that have been buying and storing wine for years – have a look round your college cellar, they’re usually fairly subsidized.

Intoxficated

0

nn

Marry me… Undergrad?

0

They say you should leave Oxford with a first, a husband or a blue. Which one would you choose? Liz Williams graduated from Oxford this year with a First and a husband. She met her beau at a ball in Hilary of first year, and he proposed in Trinity of third year. “We got married just after Finals so we did a lot of the preparation for the wedding while revising. It was nice to be able to flick through bridal magazines as a break from law revision. I usually revised in the day and planned for the wedding in the evening; having a wedding to look forward to was really useful to off-set the stress of Finals.”

Liz explained how she and Harry had always wanted to get married, but that it was her year abroad in Germany that decided the time frame. “I could see it coming but I wasn’t sure exactly when he would propose.” Though her friends from Oxford found it odd as a concept to get married so young, Liz told how friends in Germany were really shocked. “Possibly because those who go into higher education there stay in education longer, so marriage is put off till later”, she explained. While her friends were celebrating the end of Finals by going travelling in exotic countries, she spent the summer in a cottage in Warwickshire with her new husband. “We got married in August and by then it was pretty expensive to go anywhere too crazy.”

Gabriel Martindale proposed to his girlfriend in Trinity of third year, on a punt in Magdalen’s river by Batwillow Meadow. Gabriel and Dina had been going out for a year and a half; they got together in Michaelmas of his second year and her fourth year. “Some of my friends were very surprised we had got engaged, some were less, and some wondered why it took so long,” he said. “I didn’t want to get married till after I finished my degree, although my wife points out that I did not help much anyway so it would not have made a difference!”

“I think it’s sad that more people don’t get married, even when they know they are in love,” Gabriel explained. “But we wanted to prove that it was possible to get married – to show you can have a nice wedding on a modest budget. Getting married so young will continue to be the exception unless there are any massive societal changes.”

But not everyone waits till after finals to tie the knot. Bryony Collins, who also graduated from Oxford this summer with a First in Archaeology and Anthropology, got married at the end of first year. She met Rusty, now aged 35, during her gap year in New Zealand, and was already engaged when she matriculated at St Hugh’s back in 2007.

“We arranged the wedding during my first year, and did most of the planning in Trinity, which was a nice diversion form prelims revision. I was split between revising really hard and being super excited about Rusty coming to England and the wedding.

“Most people at college viewed me as ‘the one who got married’ and some people found it really strange. But everyone from my course was really accommodating. We had to go on a two week excavation dig, and at that time Rusty had just moved to the UK with nowhere to live. I asked my tutor if Rusty could come on the dig too, so he came with, and actually did the dig with us.”

Though Bryony lived in Hugh’s accommodation for her first year, she lived out with Rusty during her second and third year. “Obviously living with Rusty made a huge difference to my time at university, but I preferred it. I lived with him in Oxford all year round, so it really felt like my home, and it was nice to get away from the crazy, intense atmosphere of college.

“I definitely did not go out as much as most of my friends but that would have been the case anyway, as I’m not that fussed about the nightlife here. I was part of the trampolining club, so went out on crew dates and socials in my first year, but not as much after I was married. I know most people wait at least until after they have graduated if they want to get married. But for us it was the choice between getting married and living together in same country, or spending three years going back and forth between England and New Zealand. We were already engaged so getting married didn’t feel like a massive step.”
Scott Berry is one of two second year PPE students at Wadham to be engaged. But Scott’s situation is even more unique: he lives with his fiancée Dani and baby daughter, Maddie. Scott and Dani met when they were seventeen, and started going out when they were eighteen. In November, when Dani was a few months into her first year at Sheffield University and Scott was on his gap year, they found out that Dani was pregnant.

“Dani did not get pregnant on purpose but we decided to keep the baby. Both our parents were really shocked when they found out, but now they have come round to it all. Wadham have also been really helpful; one of the first people we spoke to was the Wadham Admissions Tutor, who sorted out a college owned apartment for us in Kidlington.”

However, Scott described how in other ways the college has not been as supportive: after problems with student finance, as Maddie was born after the applications were due in, the Domestic Bursar threatened to kick Scott, Dani and Maddie out of the flat.
Scott said, “Having a baby has definitely changed things, but then this was inevitable. Its harder to make friends if your living out of college in your first year. The main thing is time – I want to spend time with my family and see my daughter growing up. Even though part of my life is very different to others, I still have a lot in common with other students, I’m still at uni studying for my degree. People at Wadham tend to be surprised but not judgmental”.

Scott explained how having a child has much more of an impact than just being engaged. “There’s a sense in which I wish I could be a normal student, be able to go out till late and not worry about getting up when Maddie cries at 6a.m. But I would never sacrifice Maddy and Dani for it.”

The average age at which people get married continues to rise. In 1961 the average age for first marriage in England and Wales was 25.6 years for men, and 23.1 years for women. By 2000 this rose to 30.5 for men and 28.2 years for women. But given the number of students at Oxford who have long term partners while at university, it is perhaps surprising that there aren’t more Trinity proposals on punts, mid-finals wedding planning, and post-finals wedding celebrations. So why isn’t everyone doing it?

There is a lot of social pressure not to get tied down, as well as financial pressure, what with student loans to pay off and an unstable job market. Many people do not want to rush into things like buying a flat together and opening joint bank accounts. Some even say you are ruining your life to get married when you are so young, and would never even consider it. Graduates often want to become established in their careers before they turn their attention to marriage. Perhaps it is also the strange atmosphere at university that makes it hard to export a relationship straight from Oxford into the real world. There’s quite a big gap between bringing your boyf to your college bop and bringing him to your corporate client dinners. Getting engaged, married and having a baby will almost certainly remain the exception while at uni. And perhaps its best that way.