Wednesday 15th October 2025
Blog Page 1957

The ups and downs of sport this term

0

Promotion Push

Monday Night Rugby

Nothing guarantees attendance at an event like value for money, which explains why Iffley Road saw an almost packed house for the game with Wasps last week. As the Aviva Premiership grinds on with an at times crushing monotony – two matches last weekend were decided solely by penalty kicks at goal – Blues games on Mondays are a free-flowing, high-scoring spectacle with £1 drinks thrown in for good measure. What’s not to love?

Merton/Mansfield

If the best things come in small packages, nowhere has this been truer than on Oxford’s football fields these first two weeks of the season. Carrying on their run of form from last year, Merton/Mansfield – not exactly two colleges that would spring to mind if you were asked for sporting powerhouses – are top of the league after winning their first two matches. A thumping 3 – 0 win over Teddy Hall in first week was followed up by an equally emphatic victory over Hugh’s this, making them an early contender for the title.

Relegation Dogfight

Walking

One of the common facts that are banded about around Oxford is that you can get from St John’s College, Oxford to its namesake in Cambridge only walking on land owned by the two colleges. If this is true then presumably their Oxford sports ground marks the halfway point where above-averagely enthusiastic testers of Oxbridge legends can have a break before continuing their journey. I don’t care if it has under-floor heating, why is it so bloody far away?

The Blues

A thumping loss to Wasps at rugby, a defeat by Brookes in a football friendly, and the most undergraduates ever selected for the OUBC squad with only one returning Blue. It hasn’t been a great start to the season for the elite of Oxford sport. Meanwhile in Cambridge their Blues also lost to London Irish. However this was only by 12 points, and against a team that contained occasional England Fly-half Shane Geraghty. Their boat club – whilst also having a healthy dash of undergraduate talent – has four returning Blues and a medallist from the under 23 world championships. Obviously this doesn’t take into account the fact that Cambridge are our natural inferiors, but still, I’m getting a bit worried. I only like playing up to the idea of the Varsity grudge when we win.

From the player’s mouth

0

JCR Women’s Football Fourth Division

 

New Women 16

 

Somerville Women’s II 0

 

Last Sunday saw the first appearance of the season for the much-heralded Somerville Women’s 2nd XI football team. As the only ladies second team to grace the football league they had high hopes following their intensive pre-season tour at the new Park End site  and its surrounding alleyways. Unfortunately, these hopes were dashed even before the first whistle was blown; as players and fans alike received the devastating news that the team’s star striker had been withdrawn due to a recent groin strain.

 

Let us return to the plush pastures of the New College Sports grounds as the scene went from bad to worse against New College 1st XI, revealing what can only be described as a blatant breach of Fourth Division regulations: an aesthetically pleasing hunk of a referee. The extensive training program of the Somerville ladies had not prepared for this sort of vindictive game plan and the bewildered stars were left shocked and distracted. Unfairly disadvantaged, five goals slid past the normally solid Somerville back four within the first three minutes of play.

 

Any optimism that the brave ladies had managed to hold on to ebbed away early in the first half when the team’s only player to have previously witnessed a football game (Lucy Dubberley) caught the elbow of New College’s Vinnie Jones and was forced to go off with a suspected broken nose. Despite the unconcealed nature of the sadistic offence, the referee resolutely refused to award a free kick. From this point onwards the game was tainted by referee bias, culminating in his indifference when faced with what one onlooker described as ‘the most blatant penalty I think I’ve ever seen in second-tier ladies’ college football.’

 

Somerville continued to battle hard in the second-half, entering New College’s half on at least one occasion. The final score-line of 0-16 certainly does not do justice to the fitness and skill of the Somerville ladies 2nd XI.

 

Rachel Boakes

 

JCR Football Premier Division

 

Wadham 2

 

St Catz 4

 

Wadham were back in action this week looking to build on a solid performance from the 1-1 draw at Christchurch. St Catz were searching for their first league points after humbling defeats to a blues strengthened Worcester and more surprisingly to a weak Christchurch. Wadham went one up in the first minute thanks to a mercurial strike from skipper Mike ‘Lego’ Edwards. Wadham pressed hard for the first 30 minutes and were rewarded when Tim Poole carefully placed his 20 yard strike onto the St Catz defender’s heel to skilfully wrong-foot the keeper. Catz clawed one back before the break as Chris Lyle scythed down the St Catz winger for a stonewall penalty, Carl Assmundson stepped up to score but not before John ‘Cowboy’ Jenkins got a firm hand to it. Lyle was rewarded for his hard work with a taxi to A&E after some deft knifework from the St Catz striker, although it might have looked more like a painful head collision to the untrained eye. This was the second time Chris has needed stitches in his forehead in three appearances. St Catz turned up after the break and seemed to actually be pretty good,with striker John Langton threatening. The equaliser came from a soft-free kick headed in by an unmarked Chris Rees. Wadham battled on and special mention goes to the centre-back fresher pairing of Josh Vivian and Anthony Ojukwu who put in some full-blooded tackles which were given, in my opinion wrongly, as fouls by referee John Lowe. Catz won the game thanks to a brace from Chris Lambert, and probably deservingly took home the three points.

 

Michael Edwards

 

JCR Football Football Premier Division

 

Christ Church 0

 

Teddy Hall 3

 

Teddy Hall earned an impressive victory at champions Christ Church, a win that gives them 6 points from an opening 9. The House might be the home of last year’s trophy, but this Christ Church team was much depleted from the side that so dramatically stole a league-clinching 92nd minute goal (incidentally against Teddy Hall) on the final day of the 2009/2010 season.

 

Teddy Hall began their season with high hopes of success in the league and cup, but were surprisingly (and comfortably) beaten on the opening day by an impressive Merton/Mansfield side. They have since impressively beaten Worcester and arrived at Christ Chuch sports ground hoping to continue their revival.

 

0-0 at half-time, the game was balanced and scrappy, neither college asserting themselves on a strangely hot, sapping October afternoon. Set-pieces were the difference; Teddy Hall scored three times from corners, directly or indirectly, surprising the champs with their ability and efficiency in the air. Goals on 60 minutes, 70 minutes, and 80 minutes sealed a comfortable finish for the elated visitors, as shocked as anyone at the ease with which they coasted the final half-hour. This was, without doubt, a significant result, one that suggests another wide-open year in the Premier Division.

 

Inevitably for such a successful side, the Blues have come calling for the stars of Christ Church’s show, and the club must now adapt to the loss of some key playmakers. ChCh and Teddy Hall are the top flight’s last two victors, and bouts between them are always heavyweight encounters. This one, though, was a deserved scalp for Teddy, an intrepid team who will cause some more upsets yet. To build a powerhouse in college sport is a great challenge: ask Worcester, a previous football dynasty who’ve just spent a season mired in the First Division. Graduations and injuries are hazardous in equal measure, and windows of real opportunity can slam shut in a matter of weeks. Teddy want to prise theirs open, where Christ Church must improve if they wish to extend their period in the sun.

 

Scott Mody

 

Oxford women net an emphatic victory

0

One of the drawbacks of living next to the Cherwell’s Sport Editor is that when you happen to have sat through an entire game of netball it becomes a racing certainty that you will have to pen a few thoughts for the benefit of the readership. However, I am happy to do so as the performance I witnessed was not only truly impressive but a revelation to me.

My reason for attending, which I tried to stress to the friends who raised an eyebrow when I said I was spending my Wednesday afternoon watching a girl’s netball match alone, was to see an old friend who was representing Warwick’s team.

The game was dominated by Oxford with the final score a fair reflection of their comprehensive dismantling of Warwick’s 1st team. The sequencing of passing was both fluid and accurate; this was clearly a team who had learnt to anticipate each other’s positioning on court to great effect.

It did not take long for the goal shooter to be given the chance to score, which she capitalized on almost without fail. By the end of the first quarter the pattern of play had been established and Warwick did not seem able to offer anything to disrupt Oxford’s seamless passage of passes.

The main impetus for Oxford’s impressive scoring rate was a strong performance from Sarah Godlee at goal attack, who is new to the team, combined with Nat Hoon, goal shooter, who put the game beyond the reach of Warwick. However, the standout performance of the match came from Hannah McKay in goal defence who made a series of effortless interceptions in the circle and midcourt to neutralize any resistance that Warwick could offer.

It was a credit to the team as a whole that despite securing the match early on the girls continued to demonstrate an exceptionally high standard of netball to the final whistle. The ease of victory was all the more remarkable given that this was the first game of the season and the first time the girls had all played together; in these early stages it would seem that this is a team to watch this year.
I have to confess that this was actually the first full game of netball I have watched; yet despite initially going just to see a friend I was entertained and enthralled throughout, so if you are stuck for something to do of an afternoon, get yourself down to Iffley and support a little publicized but very talented side.

Oxford 63

Warwick 5

Not quite stuck in the mud

0

There is always a little taste of chaos at cross country Cuppers. With a broad field full of hopeful freshers, Varsity selection in the balance, and more mud underfoot than the Ypres Salient, you invariably get the feeling that the first race of the cross country season is going to spring a few surprises.

So did Cuppers deliver on its shock value this year? Yes and no. Yes, some complete unknowns performed brilliantly in both the men’s and women’s races, and St Anne’s celebrated an unexpected victory. But no, the big names turned in big performances, led by Green Templeton’s supercharged Dave Bruce.

The women’s race was tightly contested. Established Blue Clare Kane (Christ Church) led from the start, but was made to work hard for the win by newcomer Ella Waldman (Somerville). Waldman kept Kane’s lead as slippery as the treacherous course, and in the end she finished only six seconds behind Kane’s credible 22:01.

Third place was a tight squeeze between Noelle Lopez (Balliol), the women’s vice captain, and last year’s captain Natasha Poole (Hilda’s). The two experienced runners kept in sight of the leaders and battled all the way along the 6k course, but in the end Poole capped off a superb return from injury with a strong finish to claim the bronze with some 20 seconds to spare. Becky Gardner (Catz) and Cait Mullarkey (Trinity) also ran well to finish fifth and sixth respectively.

Uppity freshers ran riot in the men’s race. Dave Bruce came in 40 seconds clear of the field with an outstanding 32:51 over a course that by now resembled an ugly chocolate mousse, but he trailed carnage in his wake. Four virgin runners broke into the top ten, led by the excellent Fabe Downs (LMH) in second. Downs had to fend off fellow fresher Fraser Scott (Lincoln) and OUCCC veteran Michael Osborne (New). It was Osborne, running as a guest, who took third with 33:45, while Scott crashed home a few seconds behind.

Close behind, Tom Frith (St Anne’s) held off Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard (Christ Church) for fifth. A threatening and much improved Alan Cherry stormed in seventh ahead of Adam Lewandowski and Peter Hodkinson. Club Secretary Carl Assmundson rounded off the top ten with a fair 34:57 after a long spell on the sidelines. St Anne’s showed great strength further down the field to take the title.

With many Blues hopefuls either looking on in their tracksuits, gingerly returning or just downright absent, it’s probably too early to draw any lasting conclusions from Cuppers. But OUCCC Captain Dave Taylor – who finished a gentlemanly 15th – will have been encouraged by the healthy crop of freshers as he looks to overcome Cambridge for the third year running.

The best news for the club are the strong 34 runners, who despite the mud bath, all clocked in under 40 minutes. Taylor will hope to reverse a history of defeat in the open mob matches. The sound of feet squelching over this awful course must have been music to his ears. Chaos, yes, but it is just this kind of chaos the OUCCC want to take over to Cambridge in November.

Vince Cable is a no show

0

Vince Cable has cancelled his talk in Oxford merely a day before his due arrival. His choice to cancel was a response to a police notification that a large student protest was planned.

A spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats was unable to comment, however University officials have confirmed his change of plans.

Students are still planning to go ahead with the protest, and maintain that it was always intended to be peaceful. The protest against the Browne Review proposals announced this month is expected to be one of the largest Oxford student protests in recent years.

News Roundup: Second week

0

Naomi Richman and Camilla Turner discuss the consequences of the Browne Review, and whether Oxford will turn into Disneyland.

For King and Country

0

It must be said that archery has come a long way since the days of Agincourt. Archers now have much more advanced bows than the bent sticks used in the Hundred Years War; archery equipment is now made out a variety of materials including aluminium, wood, foam and, of course, carbon fibre.

There are three main types of bow used today. The most common is the recurve bow. More technical than this is the compound; with a system of pulleys that take the weight off the draw, making it easier to pull back. Finally there are the longbows still pining for the days of shooting down a French knight – longbow archers from the wreckage of the Mary Rose were actually found to have one shoulder bigger than the other as a result of archery.

Oxford University Company of Archers is one of the larger clubs in the country. The club competes in the midlands archery league and has finished in the top six at the university nationals three times in the last two years (indoor and outdoor). However, it is not all about the competitions (or the training – we try not to make people deformed!). For those not fussed about competitions, just turn up to a session and have some fun. Beginners are more than welcome at the club and training is offered to as high a level as you want to take it.

Cherwell photo blog – Week 3

0

Fancy yourself as a photographer?

Want your photographs from around and about Oxford seen by the thousands of people who visit the Cherwell website every day?

If so, why not send a few of your snaps into [email protected]

 

Saturday – St John’s from St Giles – William Granger

 

Friday – Aerialist at the Regal – Sophie Balfour-Lynn

 

Thursday – Small Audience – Jason Sengel

 

Wednesday – SWP Protest in central Oxford – Alexander Lunt

 

Tuesday – Barbeque on Headington Park – Clare Richards

 

Monday – Monitoring Little Clarendon – Urska Mali

 

Sunday – Man on Parks Road – Lauri Saksa

Time to lose the NUS

0

I’m more than a bit fed up with the NUS. This is a body which seems to exist solely to further the political aspirations of those involved, and spends most of its time playing politics at the expense of the least fortunate pupils and students in this country. Their response to the Browne review demonstrates how politicised they have become, and how willing they are to sacrifice what they proclaim to believe in.

 

Today the Lib Dems effectively ruled out removing the cap on fees. This is a move that will only make a difference to the richest of graduates, and which puts thousands of pounds back in their pockets. With repayments and interest rates both capped under Browne’s recommendations, the poorest graduates pay back less than they do under current system, only the better off pay more, and nobody pays back more than they can afford. The loan is also written off after a set period, so nobody is followed by the spectre of debt into their old age.

 

The status quo on the other hand treats almost everybody the same, with someone on £25,000 being hit harder than someone on £250 million. More to the point, the status quo has our university educations being subsidised by bottom rate taxpayers struggling to make ends meet, and who have never received any direct benefit from university. If we get the benefit, we should bear the cost.

 

The only problem with Browne is that headline fee levels might put off students from lower income backgrounds. This, I agree, is a serious issue. However, it is not insurmountable. Proper careers advice and responsible media reporting would let poorer students know that they will never be asked for more than they can afford, and the sums they pay will only be large if their salaries are as well.

 

This is where the NUS come in. The primary reason this problem exists, and that thousands of school children across Britain think they can’t afford to pay for university, is because the NUS tell them that. They come on TV and tell pupils that if you’re not from Eton, you can’t afford it. They pronounce in the papers that it’ll be infinitely harder for children from state schools. And these children believe them. They believe the students put in place to look after them, who take more interest in getting a column in that week’s Guardian than in opening up access.

 

For once, a fairer system of university funding is being proposed. One that makes it easier for lower income graduates to repay their debts, and that stops lumbering taxpayers with the cost of our tutorials. Sadly a bunch of people are too busy targeting their £65,738 salaries in Westminster to think about the multitudes of people who benefit from fairer repayments, and the schoolchildren whose aspiration is crushed by their false tales of impossible fees.

Claim your right to rewrite the new writing

0

If you haven’t heard of the OUDS New Writing Festival, don’t worry. You shouldn’t have. Until last year, the festival consisted of a paltry six plays submitted by students who scribbled some dialogue in their notebook when they should have been taking notes in Shakespeare lectures.

But last year, for reasons unknown, the festival exploded into an actual honest-to-God festival, a massive thirty-eight play competition. The OUDS Committee was forced to pull all-nighters, reading all thirty-eight plays and whittling the stack down to about a dozen.
These dozen scripts were then passed on to the Soho Theatre’s literary associate, Helen Eastman. Eastman pulled an all-nighter, and cut the pile down to six. These were in turn forwarded to the super-playwright Michael Frayn, of Copenhagen fame. It is not known how well he slept that night. But four battered and coffee-ringed scripts staggered onto the BT stage last Hilary, representing the gleaming cream of Oxford playwriting.

And now the circus is beginning again, and the OUDS Secretary has a message for hopeful new writers: ‘Write! Please write! Submit! It’s the chance of a lifetime that happens only once a year! Do it! Write! Stop reading this article and start writing!’. If you are still reading this article, you should know that there are enticing rumours of playwright Christopher Hampton and director Trevor Nunn being asked to judge the Festival this year which might actually make this a chance of a lifetime if you fancy two of the biggest names in theatre reading over your script.

For any of you who missed last year’s NWF and are scratching your heads for inspiration, a safe bet would be to do a remix of last year’s four finalist plays to make sure you cover all the bases. The Cherwell has helpfully provided you with a basic outline for you to flesh out individually:

Act 1: Don’t have your main character ever come on stage. Have all your other characters talk about her and her conspicuous absence. If it’s a boy, have them talk about his penchant for wanking or bribing women with pizza.

Act 2: Enter Odd Character Inexplicably Wearing Wig and Heels. This one should be a boy, for the effect to really hit home on your audience. Channel Beckett with lines like, ‘What if?’ ‘If what?’ ‘Who, you?’ ‘Me. Who?’

Act 3: Then have a brief interlude with a new character who does magic tricks. It would be nice to give one of the smaller characters a corresponding monologue about something along the lines of God/Life/Escape/Death accompanied by physical theatre-style gestures.

Act 4: Then have Incredibly Attractive Woman enter in a ballgown. Make her do the splits and do a poetry-slam style version of a Shakespearian monologue.

Act 5: Let it be disturbingly interrupted by a boy describing a woman’s breasts. Channel Beckett again and require that this goes on for at least six minutes. Have Attractive Woman do a backflip into this boy’s arms. Play a Regina Spektor song and have all the other characters drink Strongbow. DO NOT bring on the absent main character at all costs. Lights out.

The deadline for the New Writing Festival submissions is Friday of 5th week. Email [email protected] with any questions. Visit www.ouds.org/New_Writing_Festival for rules of entry.