Tuesday 14th October 2025
Blog Page 1958

Review: Despicable Me

0

Animated films always seem to fit into two different camps; either they are awful cash cows (‘A Shark’s Tale’, ‘Shrek 3’) or they are true labours of love (‘Toy Story 3’, ‘Shrek’). It has become a rare find to watch an animated children’s film that takes the middle road, but ‘Despicable Me’ is it. Not revolutionary, but not something that has been quickly made to fill a gap in schedules.

‘Despicable Me’, like Pixar’s ‘The Incredibles’, is set in a comic-book like setting where villains exist, but strangely there is no caped crusader or masked vigilante in sight. In fact, being a villain is its own profession, with paid minions and a Bank of Evil to get loans from. Gru, voiced by Steve Carrell, is not the sort of villain that you would send Jack Bauer after; styled like a French cartoon character, his most evil acts seem to be stealing monuments from Vegas or bursting children’s balloons. Saying this, his big plot of the century is to steal the moon and then sell it back for fame and fortune, and to help him with this he has the great inventor, cockney Dr Nefario, expertly voiced by Russell Brand. And of course he also has his army of yellow, worm like minions. These numerous minions are reminiscent of the game Lemmings – they act as very effective comic relief. With all the ‘Looney Tune’ like physical gags as well as cute voice work and costumes, the minions are easily the second best part of the film, with the greatest part being the orphans Margo, Edith and Agnes. These 3 girls provide the heart of the film, as they are all so sweet together with Gru that they create the warmest moments that will melt your heart.

Outside of this Gru/orphans dynamic, the film ends up being pretty run-of-the-mill, which makes it rather dull at times. The supporting cast of Jason Segel and Julie Andrews are very good, but the story and script are just not complex nor mature enough. This may seem harsh given that this is a kids’ film, but many great movies for children have worked around this and managed to entertain both adults and children equally. However, there are a quite a lot of chuckles with some genuinely laugh out loud moments. The 3D was also used exceptionally well; in fact, it might be the best use of 3D I have ever seen (apologies to James Cameron), but even with all this, the whole production feels very middle ground. There is no new way of looking at the genre, the story or the characters. Perhaps if it was released 10 or so years ago it would have seemed slightly more original and impressive, but unfortunately with all the high caliber animation movie-goers see at the moment, being adequate just isn’t good enough. That is not to say audiences should give this film a miss – it is worth seeing – but don’t expect too much from it. You will leave the cinema smiling, but will forget the film as soon as that smile fades.

Throw Ken overboard, before it’s too late

0

Ken Livingstone’s always been a maverick, and isn’t exactly known for doing what he’s told. This week he has overstepped the mark. The election for Mayor of Tower Hamlets has been marred in controversy, with the Labour candidate initially selected being removed by the NEC after allegations of extremism. The NEC, fearful of ousting a Muslim and replacing him with the white man who came second, put the third place candidate up instead. Lutfur Rahman, the displaced candidate, has just beaten his replacement and won his election as Mayor of Tower Hamlets.

 

So what does this have to do with Ken? Well despite Labour Party rules forbidding any party member campaigning against a party candidate, he spent the entire run up to the election campaigning for Rahman. Eleven Labour Party members, including eight councillors, have been thrown out of the Party for this offence. Ken, however, seems immune. There has been no official comment from Labour, and Ed Miliband has remained completely silent.

 

What is perhaps most worrying, is that regardless of whether the allegations submitted against Rahman were true, his views are certainly not ones the Labour Party, or any party, should be endorsing. Rahman’s activists heckled women on their way to the polls for their ‘immodest dress’, no doubt scaring many away from voting. Rahman himself has been noted as attending a “Spot the Fag” game at a local mosque.

 

I would expect any candidate, for any party, who endorses such behaviour to be removed from that party. As in Rahman’s case, they may go on to be elected, and it is right that we should respect democracy where it speaks, but that does not mean our national political parties should allow such views to simmer within their ranks. Similarly, party members who not only defy the Constitution of the party they purport to represent, but tie themselves to a campaign so murky as this, should too be expelled.

 

Ken Livingstone cannot enjoy the luxury of Labour’s campaign funds whilst opposing and embarrassing the Party in public. He must either integrate himself into what Labour is now and commit to that mission, or leave. In this case, Ed Miliband should summon up some courage and ensure he’s pushed.

The Myth of French Cinema

0

What is it about being French that makes something cool? French bread, French Connection, French kissing. The prefix seems to bring with it an air of sophistication and chic (with the notable exception of French and Saunders). Nowhere is this more true than with French film. Consider the sentence ‘she likes to watch films’. The individual described sounds fairly regular, possibly even a bit dull (I like films probably more than the next man but saying it in conversation can solicit eye rolling and assumption that you just loved Tranformers 2). Now just observe the wonders that ‘French’ can do – ‘she likes to watch French films’. Suddenly our mystery woman has become cultured, interesting, probably the sort to write poetry and hang about in smoky rooms listening to jazz. Its frankly unfair.

It’s not that French film never deserved this title; the Nouvelle Vague earned it in the 50’s and 60’s. The experiments with visual style, the jump cuts, the spirit of backyard film making, without it modern cinema would not be what it is in that there would be no Coppola, Scorsese or Tarantino (who dedicated Reservoir Dogs to director of À bout de soufflé, Jean-Luc Godard – I know… wikipedia can surprise us all). For a while French film was at the cutting edge.

But that time has passed. French film now is nothing to get excited about. Ok that might be a bit far; Amelie was good, so was La Haine, but they weren’t really ground breaking, nor typical of the quality of the vast bulk of French films produced. The big French release you may have heard of this summer was Heartbreaker. It was lazy, predictable and clunky, yet the plot (not startlingly dissimilar to the also terrible 2001 film Heartbreakers with Jennifer Love-Hewitt and Sigourney Weaver) was heralded by the Telegraph as recalling ‘a time in film history when rom-coms were amusing and glamorous as well as romantic’. Time Out London called it ‘instantly amusing’ and ‘hilarious’. I began to think that it might just be me until I saw the faces of the other people leaving the cinema. The smiles were fixed, the comments forced. Everyone was looking nervously at their friends, worried about being the one who didn’t get it. In my case I looked across at my friends. Did they all think that it was god’s gift to cinema?

‘What was that s***?!’

The spell was broken. Nobody had enjoyed it.

It’s not that French film can’t be good, it obviously can. But just the fact that it’s French shouldn’t afford it an air of brilliance.

Review:The Royal Hunt of the Sun

0

God and Gold make a story. And to tell it, The Royal Hunt of the Sun will use so much fabric that it could span twice the length of an Olympic sized swimming pool! Twice. That’s right, enough to drown in. When you read the production notes on the sheer amount of gold glint used to embellish the stage and the 10 months it has taken to make all the intricate head-gear and artefacts, well it is very impressive. We will see the Oxford Playhouse being illuminated by Inca bracelets, bangles, anklets, necklaces, and all numbers of exotic priceless stage dressings. But there’s a nagging feeling that creeps up inside.

Could this entire visual spectacle be an elaborate distraction from the actual acting? It’s hard to tell because there is still so much time left for improvement before the show opens in 3rd week. Peter Shaffer’s play is a romanticised re-telling of the 16th century Spanish expedition led against the Inca civilisation. This play is intended to be grand, with an epic musical score and stylised dialogue to capture the audience’s imagination. Unfortunately, the acting seemed to fall short of the hype aroused by its production team – not across the entire cast– but in the two main characters of Francisco Pizarro and the King of the Incas Atahuallpa.

The problem may have been the high level of intensity that Jacob Taee’s Pizarro had to maintain throughout the play. When this somewhat larger-than-life character is being wracked with doubt about his Christian faith, the acting came off as petulant ranting. When Pizarro was being heroic striving to defend his new friend, the King of the Incas, there was an absence of playable emotion and instead, quite a lot of shouting. When the King of the Incas himself, played by Joe Robertson, clapped together his palms and spoke with the tongue of a god, the effect was disappointing, lacking the regal flourish and confidence required to make such a moment work. Not a flop but altogether unpersuasive, these great men weren’t as we wanted them to be, and if there was any humour or affection between them then it was drowned out by the hum of pan-pipes, the fluttering of fabric and the gleam of the gold leaf.

What held the principal players together in this large cast of over 20 actors, were the Cassie Barraclough and Marcel Miller’s Incan generals. With towering stilts that allowed them to bound across the stage and thundering voices, they pierce through gabble of quarrelling Spanish ministers and make their onstage presence mysterious and powerful. And Alfie Enoch’s De Soto was able to bring the impassioned speech and valour that playing a Spanish conquistador demands. The other Spanish soldiers kept the pace exciting, whilst the omnipotent narration given by Jonathan Webb (playing his older-self long after the expedition had taken place) is a good dramatic device that keeps the audience engaged with the nicely choreographed scenes taking place on stage.

The play is definitely unique and an ambitious task for a student budget. If this potentially strong cast can through the teething problems of making somewhat two-dimensional characters come to life in a satisfying way, then this production of Royal Hunt promises to be astounding and mesmerising.

Archeology digs at Roman sites

0

A new project has been launched this week to explore East Oxford’s Roman and medieval archaeological sites.

Led by the University’s Department for Continuing Education, the project has been made possible by a £330,000 grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Academics on the project will spend the next three years working with Oxford residents on digs, excavations, and surveys at sites believed to include Roman settlements, a medieval leper hospital and Civil War siege works.

The project is the biggest community outreach scheme of its type to be launched by the University.

Vice Chancellor Andrew Hamilton said, “Oxford University spends a lot of time looking out at the world, but we are also totally grounded in the local community.”

“The University is 900 years old, but this will find many things that will go far beyond that period.”

£1 billion fundraiser retires

0

Dame Vivien Duffield is set to retire as the chairman of the Oxford Thinking fundraising campaign, reports the Telegraph.
Since taking up the post in 2008, Dame Duffield is credited with having raised more than £1 billion for the University’s fundraising campaign.

Oxford Thinking, “the biggest fundraising campaign in European history,” has raised £961 million to date, and is aiming to reach £1.25 billion.

Last year, the University’s endowment stood at £585 million, with combined college endowments reaching £2.4 billion.
Dame Duffield, a graduate of Lady Margaret Hall, has also contributed £5.1 million of her own money to the campaign and is estimated to have donated £176 million from her various foundations.

Calls for child heart unit closure

0

An NHS review announced last Friday that paediatric heart surgery should no longer take place at Oxford’s John Radcliffe hospital.
The review aims to reduce the number of specialist centres in Britain. Out of the eleven centres inspected, the John Radcliffe received the lowest ranking assessment by a “significant margin”.

Parents of children who have undergone surgery at the unit have expressed their outrage at the NHS decision and have launched a campaign to save the service.

Heart operations were suspended at the hospital earlier this year following the deaths of four infants at the surgery unit. The surgeon Caner Salih has since been found by an independent investigation to have made no errors in judgement.

Students assaulted in brutal beatings

0

Fears about student safety have been raised this week following three violent assaults in central Oxford.

These latest attacks follow two stabbings Cowley last week.
Third year student Laurence Osborn was robbed by a group of five men on Parks Road, opposite Keble college, leaving him with severe head injuries.

“I was walking into the centre of town for a friend’s birthday when I saw a group of guys on bikes and a moped coming towards me on the pavement rather than the road. I didn’t think for a moment that I was a target because I was so close to town.”

The group pushed Osborn against a wall and threatened physical violence unless he handed over his phone. Osborn complied but the attackers decided the phone wasn’t valuable enough to steal and broke it instead.

After punching him, the group began to move away. However, when Osborn stayed to attempt to retrieve his glasses from the ground, the attackers threw a bottle at him and forced Osborn to run in the direction of The King’s Arms.

Despite his injuries, Osborn commented, “It’s more psychologically wounding than physically wounding. I’ve been having flashbacks, but I’m alright. I’m not going to let it affect the academic year and my tutors have been supportive.”

The attack left Osborn with a broken nose and fractured cheek. He was admitted to A&E because of blood clots and worries that the compound breakage of bone as well as cartilage in the nose was consistent with skull fracture.

Although the attack occurred at nine o’clock at night, no passers-by witnessed the incident, and Osborn’s attackers made off with his passport, bank cards and keys. The student was forced to remove any valuables from his college room and sleep elsewhere until the lock was changed.

A second student, Ian Maconnachie, was assaulted on his way home from Park End last Wednesday. The attack took place outside O’Neill’s pub on New Inn Hall Street at around 3am.

“My memory of the incident is a bit hazy, but I remember that there were two people I didn’t know having an argument and it got heated. I attempted to intervene and for my trouble I was punched so hard it knocked me out.

“I’ve never been hit before and I was in A&E for six hours that night. I’m quite light-hearted about the whole thing but it was so avoidable.”

The police are still investigating both incidents but there have been no arrests made so far. The rapid spate of attacks since the beginning of term has raised concerns that students are being deliberately targeted.

Osborn agreed that the attack felt like more than a straightforward mugging. He said, “Once they took my things they argued about what they were going to do with me. They decided to hit me anyway even though they’d already robbed me.
“I live in a very rough area of London, and I’ve been mugged before, but I’ve never had an experience as horrible as that. It didn’t seem like they needed to steal. It just seemed like they wanted to hurt me. When I was assaulted before it was a means to an end – they hit me first and then took my wallet. I just got the impression that they hated me.”

A further incident was reported to police on the same evening that Osborn was attacked. A 23-year-old student was admitted to hospital after being hit with a glass bottle at the corner of South Parks Road and St Cross Road. The man was walking with friends when confronted by a larger group of people at around 10.45pm.
The incident is also being treated as grievous bodily harm but no-one has been arrested.

Both Osborn and Maconnachie have praised police assistance. Maconnachie commented, “When I came around the police were already there and somebody had called an ambulance for me.”
Osborn said, “The police have been very helpful. They explained that I’ll be entitled to compensation because it was a case of grievous bodily harm.”

Tom Perry, OUSU Welfare warned that students must not underestimate the dangers of walking alone late at night. He commented, “While Oxford may seem like a quaint place to live, it is a city, and students should be careful.”

Last week, an Oxford Brookes student was stabbed outside the O2 Academy on Cowley Road. A man has now been arrested for the attack.

Benjamin Hepburn, 22, appeared at Oxford Magistrates’ Court last week and will appear at Oxford Crown Court later today. He has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

£35m quad for St John’s

0

St John’s students, fellows and alumni celebrated the official opening of the college’s new £35 million quadrangle on Saturday.
Kendrew Quadrangle is named after the Noble Prize winner and former St John’s President, Sir John Kendrew. The quad will provide seventy student rooms, a law library, a gym, café, archives, music practice areas and an events room. It is one of the largest building developments undertaken by an Oxford college in recent years.

Taking nearly a decade of planning by the college, the new quad’s design has been praised for its cutting edge approach to energy consumption and sensitivity to local surroundings.
Its innovative technology makes it one of the University’s most environmentally friendly projects to date. Geothermal heat pumps and a wood chip burner mean it has just half the carbon footprint of a conventional design.

Matthew Thomlinson, a second year St John’s student, said, “The law library looks like a really great working atmosphere, it will really help with my learning. I like that its green and eco-friendly.”
A spokesperson for St John’s said, “Kendrew Quadrangle is a first-rate building in a modern idiom that responds sensitively to the unique context of the college and the city. These top class facilities will help us to continue to attract the most able students and academics.”

Current third years at St John’s will be the first ever residents of the quadrangle. Its thirty undergraduate rooms were, according to the college JCR, “snatched up by Finalists” in the annual room ballot.

The extra accommodation space will allow St John’s postgraduates and academics to live in college for the first time.

The new building forms part of a larger project which involved the restoration of older college buildings, including a seventeenth century barn which was converted into a new exhibition and performance space.

MJP Architects, who designed the quad, also created St John’s garden quadrangle, completed in 1994, and the 2004 extension of the Senior Common Room.

Pounding the hacks: £5 charge

0

President’s Drinks at the Oxford Union will start charging members for entry, it was decided at Standing Committee this week.
The proposal, put forward by Union President James Kingston, was passed by seven votes to six at the Committee meeting on Monday evening.

Kingston said that selling tickets on a first come first serve basis would reduce “hack patronage” at an event that has often been the preserve of friends of Union officers and committee members.

President’s Drinks take place every week after the debate on the Thursday and offer members an opportunity to meet guest speakers.

A former member of Standing Committee told Cherwell that previously there had been a clear policy that members on Secretary’s Committee could bring one guest. Those on Standing could bring two, officers could bring “about five” and the President as many they wanted.

The new move will see forty tickets going on sale to Union members at a cost of £5 each, and members will only be allowed to attend two of the events per term.

Although a suggestion was also put forward to charge for attendance of the dinner that precedes the drinks, Kingston said it was “a little ridiculous” that officers who were obliged to attend and entertain the speakers should be charged to do so.
Further modifications to President’s Drinks were also proposed, including turning the Drinks into a smaller event with higher quality alcohol.

However, the Union President maintained that both speakers and members enjoyed the weekly event. Kingston argued against calls to reduce the size of the guest list, reminding the committee that they existed “to serve the members”.

The decision to introduce the £5 charge has been met with mixed reactions from Union members.

One member who attended President’s Drinks regularly last year said he had used the Drinks as a forum “to hack” and stopped going once he had been successful in achieving a committee position.

He agreed that charging people would hopefully attract guests “who actually wanted to meet the speaker”. This, he thought, would be “a lot fairer”.

However, another argued that the “patronage” of the President would still apply since he or she selects who dines with speakers beforehand. Those at the dinner can attend the subsequent President’s Drinks.

He also predicted that the Union would struggle to sell forty tickets for the Drinks each week and that this will lead to Committee members inviting along their friends.

He commented, “It will very much retain a ‘Members’ Club’ atmosphere”.

The ticket charge is set to be introduced in third week. Standing Committee will re-open discussions on the proposals at its next meeting on Monday.