Tuesday 14th October 2025
Blog Page 1962

Full-frontal fright for freshers

0

Naked Christ Church second years disrupted the college matriculation photograph on Saturday morning for the second year in a row.
One pair of balaclava-clad male students were seen leapfrogging around the quad where the photo was taking place, while others held a nude picnic on the grass. The picnickers reportedly used just a kettle and a toaster to preserve their modesty.

Female students stripped off at an upstairs window in the quad, with the word ‘SMILE’ written across their torsos.

Such distractions during the matriculation photograph have been a tradition at Christ Church for many years, although wholesale nudity was only introduced last year.

The photographer, from the well-established firm Gillman and Soame, was reportedly considerably angered by the naked students. He was heard to shout “We’re trying to take a picture here!” at the leapfrogging men.

The majority of freshers are said to have enjoyed watching the spectacle. However, one first year graduate student said that he had found the experience “scarring”.

Although the stunts were observed by porters, custodians and college staff, those involved are not thought to be facing disciplinary action.
The Christ Church Junior Censor, Dr Ian Watson, has yet to contact students about the incident.

The college’s ‘Blue Book’, which contains details of its rules and regulations, makes no mention of protocols regarding nudity in over 26,000 words.

The spectacle is rumoured to have been orchestrated by a member of the JCR Committee. However the JCR President, Matt Barrett, denied any prior knowledge of events.

The committee released a statement saying, “Saturday morning was just one of those bizarre moments when a group of people spontaneously decide to strip off.

“There was absolutely no previous agreement or consensus to that effect, although it did liven up what is otherwise quite a tedious morning.”

A third year medic said, “The best part of the experience was seeing the smiles on the old Deans’ faces.”

None of those involved in the nudity were available for comment. The identity of the leapfroggers is still uncertain, despite the fact that one of their balaclavas became dislodged during their tour of the quad.
At last year’s photograph, a masked nudist somersaulted into Mercury, the famous Christ Church fountain.

The relocation of the photograph to Peckwater Quad this year was thought to be designed to prevent such incidents .

Nice Rack

0

There are lots of adjustments to be made when you move out of home. The hardest of all is probably the realisation that absolutely everything costs money. In the kitchen, all those things that line the cupboards – the extra virgin Spanish olive oil, the three different types of balsamic vinegar, even the bloody salt and pepper – are actually sourced and paid for by someone. And now, that someone is you.

Some people get round this by making a ‘big shop’ part of the termly parental drop off. Others just raid their houses, presumably leaving their parents distressed at their new mother-hubbard status. And some – although a straw poll of my friends indicate that this number may be very low – actually go and stock their store cupboard themselves.

Whatever method you choose, whether you have to beg, borrow, or even buy – my recommendation is to get some spices. It will cost under a tenner for all the essentials (cumin, coriander, ginger, turmeric, paprika although see below for a couple of jazzy extras) and they can transform 3-for-£1 chick peas or chewy looking ‘casserole meat’ with just a magical sprinkle.

See below for my first cheap and easy recipes to get your spices flowing.

Chick pea curry

Serves 4, approx 95p per serving

So cheap and so, so delicious – used creamed coconut mixed with water if coconut milk seems too indulgent (both are available in ‘World Foods’ section of most Oxford supermarkets)

1 x 400g can chick peas

1 onion


2 large cloves of garlic


olive oil


a large thumb-sized lump of ginger


2 tsps crushed, dried chillies

1 tbsp ground coriander


2 tsps ground turmeric


1.5kg squash


8 cardamom pods


400ml can of coconut milk

Peel and slice the onion into thin strips. Put two tablespoons of olive oil in a pan in, and add the onion along with the peeled and sliced garlic cloves (add them to cold oil so the garlic doesn’t burn). Cook on a low heat for about 15 minutes until the onion is soft – stirring it sometimes so it doesn’t burn. Peel the ginger and cut into thin strips – add to the onion with the dried chillies, coriander, and turmeric. Cook the spices for a couple of minutes. Pour over half a litre of water and allow to heat until boiling. Add the squash (peeled and chopped into chunks).
Cover with a lid or some tin-foil and leave simmering (slow boil) for 20 minutes. Check that the squash is tender. Remove the black seeds from the green outer casing of cardamom pods and crush them a little. Add these into the mix, along with coconut and the can of chick peas. Season with salt and pepper and leave to cook for another fifteen minutes.

This curry can be served at this stage, but if you have time, turn off the heat and let it sit – it will be more tasty if allowed to mix. Serve with boiled rice (it’s great with brown if you like it) or wrapped into a roti.

Beef tagine

Serves 5, approx £1.75 a portion

Tagine is a bit more complicated than the other recipes here. The meat will need an hour or so in the spices and then almost three hours cooking. But it just gets left alone so its not very taxing. This recipe uses the Moroccan spice mix Ras-El-Hanout. Its available at most supermarkets and costs about £2.49 from Oxford’s Tesco Metros. Its available for cheaper (about £1.80) from Maroc Deli on Cowley Road. It’s worth the effort – but if you can’t be bothered, take it out and use 1 ½ tbsps of cumin and ginger instead of just one.

Spice mix:

salt and pepper

1 tbsp ras el hanout

1 tbsp cumin

1 tbsp ground cinnamon

1 tbsp ground ginger

1 tbsp paprika

Other ingredients:

600g casserole beef (this is about the cheapest cut of meat, but is absolutely amazing when cooked for this long)

olive oil

1 onion, peeled and chopped

1 x 400g tin of chickpeas

1 x 400g tin of plum tomatoes

1 litre vegetable stock

Mix all the spices in a bowl, add the beef (chopped into small chunks if it doesn’t come like that) and rub with the spice mix. Cover with clingfilm and put into the fridge for at least an hour so the spices can mix with the meat.

When its adequately melded, heat a (preferable heavy-bottomed) pan and fry the spicy meat on a medium heat for 5 minutes. Add your chopped onion, and fry for another 5 minutes. Tip in the chickpeas (drained) and tomatoes, then pour in half the stock and give it a stir. Once it has reached boiling, stir it again and put the lid on the pan (use foil if you’re lidless). Reduce to a low-medium heat and leave for 1½ hours. Give it a stir every now and again if possible – so it doesn’t burn at the bottom.

At this point – add the second 500ml of stock and cook for another 1½ hours. After this, take off the lid – add some water if its got too dry, leave to simmer on a high heat if there’s too much liquid. Season with salt and pepper. Serve with cous cous or rice (and maybe a scattering of coriander leaves if you’re cooking for someone special).

Fajitas!

This is just the recipe for a home-made fajita seasoning, which can be added to chicken or any other meat and left for a bit (an hour is great, five minutes will do) before frying. If nothing else, it’s more authentically Mexican than Old El Paso. Omit cayenne pepper if you don’t have it – but try and use hot chilli powder for some warmth.
I haven’t included any other fajita instructions – you’re a student, it’s fajitas, you’ve made it before.

1 garlic clove, crushed or finely chopped

1½ tsp cumin

1½ tsp paprika

1½ tsp chilli powder

½ tsp oregano

½ tsp cayenne pepper

½ tsp sugar

salt and pepper

oil

Mix together the garlic and spices. Add a generous glug of oil, mix again and pour over the chicken. Leave to penetrate the chicken (ooh-er) for 20 minutes or more if you can.

Wayne’s underworld

0

A few months ago, I wrote about the heroic potential that awaited a pre-World Cup Wayne Rooney: the sporting globe was his to conquer, and his outstanding form seemed every inch prepared to deliver. Fortunes rise and fall speedily in the realm of football, but this is tragedy at terminal velocity: fast-forward a dismal summer, and the striker’s star has utterly imploded, both on and off the pitch. Remember that Nike advert, the one we all hoped presciently prophetic, with Rooney adulated and knighted? Well, it was spot on. Pity, though, because it is the satanic, post-apocalyptic and fiery version of the future that has careered and melded so seamlessly into the player’s nightmarish present.

Truth is, Rooney’s stunning decision to quit United is even more astonishing than his decision to patronize that Bolton call-girl. Like it or not, the modern footballer is an amoral animal, often revelling more in his playboy vices than in his playing victories: we fans can stomach a scandal or two, so long as the goals and wins keep coming, of course. Look at Terry and Cole and Gerrard, as leading examples, among countless other cases of unscrupulous, uncivil behaviour. Rooney, though, seems to have emerged from his embarrassing, self-created crisis by lashing out in the most illogical, counterintuitive manner: he’s bitten off the hand that feeds him, and he’s swallowed it down whole.

His temerity to cross the Old Trafford Godfather is as nonsensical as it is idiotic: Ferguson has never tolerated insubordination or misconduct, but even he is willing to grant absolution to Rooney’s enormous talent. We do not yet know for sure why exactly the player wants to leave: for one thing, a heinous hop across town to City hardly alleviates the problem of media intrusion, does it? And Chelsea is a no-go, with Rooney allegedly (and peculiarly provincially) suggesting that ‘the London lifestyle’, whatever this means, is not for him. Forget the Spanish clubs, too, which all require new recruits to learn their language: you can barely imagine philologists running for their textbooks (and earmuffs, probably) at the sound of some Scouse-Catalan pidgin, can you?

Ferguson’s powerful rhetoric has now placed the ball firmly in Rooney’s penalty area: does he evince himself the shallow, callous, greedy and vapid character that he has, often unfairly, been intimated to be? Or can he restore a shred of dignity, and re-rail his life and career: there can surely be no better club, or manager, to provide the pastoral guidance that Rooney so badly needs. The coming months are a pivotal fulcrum of his history as a professional footballer- the wrong choice now will cripple him forever, and I fear that a United exit, evermore likely, will represent a moment of harrowing remorse when all the dust eventually settles.

Rooney’s fatal flaws have never been so prevalent: he is immature, unthinking, and has far too much money for a man of his age. But tragedy might yet be averted: to remain at Old Trafford could rescue Rooney from the brink of personal and professional meltdown, because you gravely sense that his erratic soul is teetering on the precipice of some very dark places. For the sake of football fans everywhere, we should hope that the fragmented jigsaw of his inestimable ability has not been dissembled beyond repair.

United offers a sanctuary that Rooney simply cannot afford to depart: only as a Red Devil can he chase away all those demons.

Review: ‘I Don’t Want To See You Like This’

0

In a chat to Cherwell this week, The Joy Formidable’s guitarist Rhydian Dafydd highlighted the Welsh trio’s old-fashioned way of gaining popularity: ‘I think people can see through new bands’ bullshit now. We certainly haven’t relied on the hype machine. We’ve been gigging and gigging all around the country and our fanbase has grown from that.’

It’s been working for them, and with debut LP The Big Roar now set to be released in January, Welsh noise-rockers The Joy Formidable have released ‘I Don’t Want To See You Like This’. It’s a solid example of the band’s sound – Ritzy Bryan’s waiflike, ethereal vocals against a backdrop of reverberating guitar-mashing. It graces you with a few moments of tranquillity, before cruelly assaulting your aural neurones with ear-splitting hooks.

On this track, however, the overall effect can sound quite stop-start, with lines of verse sung too quietly and too quickly. Combined with two good but rather curtailed bridges, the overall effect is at times jarring. However, it certainly shows promise from a group who, after nearly three years together, are finally enjoying a rise in popularity on these shores and across the Atlantic.

Interview: Adam Buxton

0

Who are you?

‘I’m Adam Buxton.’

What do you do?

‘I am a ludicrous ponce professionally, and I spend a great deal of time wandering around confused, and occasionally I make my own little stupid videos, and I host a radio show, and it has been said that I conduct my career in reverse, ie. started by making a TV show and am now becoming progressively more obscure by choice. And it’s nice.’

Who do you do?

‘Who do I do? I do quite a good Robert De Niro, but it’s a visual thing… That’s about it really. Apart from my lovely wife, that’s all I do.’

Faves?

‘Music videos, my lovely children, my lovely wife, being alive… I mean, what a wonderful time to be alive, in some ways, and what a tragic time to be alive in other ways. That’s a very profound thing I just said.’

Worsties?

‘Crap, cynical blockbuster films, all too numerous to mention. 90% of films, really… This is a controversial thing to say, because Joe [Cornish], my best friend and partner is involved in the world of superhero movies by proxy, but I’m pretty sick of superhero movies. I could really live without another superhero movie for quite a long time.’

Jedward?

‘They’re fantastic.’

As lines of questioning go, this isn’t quite David Frost. In fact, it’s not even Larry King, let alone Piers Morgan. But these questions – along with the answers – come courtesy of Adam Buxton, the shorter, hairier half of the comic duo Adam and Joe. He has offered this challenging sextet of questions to all of his guests on his short-lived ‘Big Mixtape’ show on BBC 6 Music, and they have all reacted surprisingly well. Then again, his is a recognisable face, having first gurned its way through four series of The Adam and Joe Show to great, if cult, acclaim, before appearing in other TV projects and even several films, including Hot Fuzz and Stardust.

When we meet, he has just bounded offstage from an energetic evening at the BFI Southbank presenting BUG, a bimonthly show that exhibits the best of new music videos. His performance was witty and confident, and it ensures that the 2 hour show never drags, yet his energy is clearly a little depleted as we shake hands. His wry and occasionally bombastic demeanour has changed to one that, while extremely friendly, appears rather more shy. He suggests that we ascend to the roof for a breath of fresh air, and it is only as we sit in the London evening light, staring out over the Thames, that he begins to relax. In fairness, he has a lot to be relaxed about. Since 2007, he and Joe have presented a weekly radio show for BBC 6 Music, and in the face of Mark Thompson’s bid this year to see the station closed, Adam has campaigned tirelessly to save it, even appearing on Channel 4 News to confront the Director General directly. On that particular occasion, he jokingly challenged Thompson to a fist-fight, and now proclaims that his boss ‘was frightened of getting a good stuffing from Dr Buckles. Quite right.’ Ironically, it seems that the station’s imminent closure gave it the boost of publicity it needed, and in July Thompson’s suggestions were overturned by the BBC Trust. It’s not known whether Adam’s physical threats had any bearing on the decision, but nonetheless the station’s unexpected survival is the first subject that comes up as we sit down to talk, and he doesn’t try to conceal his joy.

‘I was personally delighted, obviously, because doing this show on 6 Music with Joe has been my favourite thing that we’ve ever done together, and I was gutted when they said they were going to close it, as was everyone else at 6 Music. But you know, I’m more of a part-timer than a lot of people there, so I had less invested I suppose. There’s always other bits and pieces I can be getting on with if I’m not doing the radio. But I thought it was a fait accompli when they announced that they were going to close it, and I couldn’t imagine that they were going to change their minds. Because it would make them look weak, and that’s the last thing they want to do.’

It’s clear that this is a subject close to his heart, and it is immediately striking how unexpectedly serious his manner becomes. I am about to suggest this to him when he completes his diatribe with an enormous belch, loud enough to turn the head of a passer-by.

‘Excuse me. A little bit of punctuation there for you.’

Moments such as this are typical of Buxton. Much of the time, he behaves as the bizarre combination of an irritable old curmudgeon raging at the small injustices of the world and an excitable and infectiously immature boy. When we approach the topic of films, this schizophrenic tendency towards simultaneous pessimism and optimism becomes fully exposed. He grumpily exasperates over cinema’s current obsession with superhero films, yet when I mention Avatar, the childlike half of him eagerly takes over.

‘I loved it, I thought it was wicked,’ he proclaims, without a hint of shame or irony. He laughs at my incredulous expression, before defending his reaction. ‘It was really good, I was in exactly the right frame of mind and it pressed all the right buttons. I love Jim Cameron, he’s amazing. Jim. I call him Jim. We’re buddies.’

I ask his position on 3D, and the wide-eyed enthusiasm disappears as quickly as it emerged, replaced once more by his comically grumpy tone.

‘That’s just a completely bogus piece of technology as far as I’m concerned. Everyone else disagrees with me. It’s stupid.’ Yet his eyes widen once again when he recalls one aspect of the experience he enjoyed: ‘The best thing about 3D movies is when subtitles come up, like in Avatar when the subtitles come up, because of the Eewar people, or whatever they were called. I thought, ‘Wow! Look at that! They’re sticking out of the screen!’ And then I carried on watching the film.’

Although these two modes of thought seem rather incongruous, he accompanies them both with his often unflinching honesty. As a result, his simultaneously grumpy and eager persona seems less odd than charming, although Adam is quick to deny that it is a persona at all.

‘It’s unfortunately real,’ he sighs, before chuckling to himself. ‘I’m not very good at mediating myself and my wife sometimes gets a little upset when I say too much, and reveal too many cringe-worthy aspects of our domestic life. It’s all very much real… It’s when I get in an unfamiliar situation and I feel as if I ought to behave a certain way and I forget to be myself – that’s when things go wrong.’

On the topic of things going wrong, I feel obliged, though a little reluctant, to bring up the topic of The Persuasionists, a BBC 2 sitcom in which Adam played Greg, a naïve employee of an advertising agency. It first appeared in January to almost universally derisive reviews, and the BBC itself swiftly moved the show to the graveyard slot of 11.20pm. At its very mention, Adam can’t help laughing out loud, but he is also keen to absolve himself of guilt.

‘I auditioned for it three or four years ago, when not much was happening in my life, and it was maybe the second or third audition I’ve ever done in my life where I’ve actually got the part. So I was really excited. And we made two pilots for it, both of which were very enjoyable to make, but they weren’t very good… And [the BBC] said, ‘We’re not going to go ahead with this.’ I wasn’t entirely surprised. But then suddenly it came back and they said, ‘Yeah, we’ve commissioned a series,’ and I thought, ‘Jesus Christ!’ And it was really fun, I had such a good time, it was one of the most enjoyable jobs that I’ve done.’

So what is his art?

‘Well, it seems a little tedious just to focus on one thing. Plus I really don’t feel – and this isn’t false modesty – but I really don’t feel I’m necessarily a genius at any one thing, or sufficiently good at any one thing so that that’s what I should do.’ Bearing in mind that he’s a regular composer of jingles and songs for his radio show, I suggest that perhaps music could be a new career, but this is met with a wistful sigh. ‘I love music and I wish I was a rock star, like a lot of comedians… People like Thom Yorke, they’re unbothered by the naysayers and the people who are going to pick apart his lyrics and call him miserable. He doesn’t worry about things like that, he goes ahead and writes whatever is in his heart. And that’s something I would love to be able to do and envy, but would never be able to do it, certainly. I’ve tried, as well, I’ve sat down and tried to write a sincere song that isn’t funny, just a good song, but it’s not in me.’

The sun has long since set when we prepare to part ways, and as gradually we descend from the roof, I can’t conceive what his next project might be. Apart from the radio show with Joe – which, he assures me, is ‘coming back in November. I think…’ – I ask him whether he has any upcoming projects, but it seems that his career is too unplanned for him to know what’s next.

‘I’ve done so many things that have come to nothing that I’m not going to hold my breath. I mean, there’s always irons in the fire, but you’re lucky if 5% of the things you’re working on actually come to anything. And then of that 5%, maybe a tiny fraction will actually be any good.’ His older, pessimistically world-weary side has reared its head, I note, but he simply shrugs. ‘In my experience, it’s a punishing ratio of quality to bollocks.’

Interview: S1l3nc3

0

I do a lot of strange things, but this must rank among the strangest.

It is a glorious evening on Port Meadow: a hundred thousand miles’ width of cobalt sky, bisected by the bright white scar of a double jet trail. I switch off my iPod as I approach the gate.

And there, Silence is waiting. Or, as he would have it, s1l3nc3. The internet tells me s1l3nc3 is a magician and mind reader from Oxford, who picked up a small sackful of critical awards at Edinburgh this summer. The twist – the twist that has me chewing my lip and looking about me as watchfully as a dope fiend – is that he performs in total silence.

Silence is dressed in careful black, with a scarlet scarf and scarlet laces in his black Allstars. We shake hands. He points towards the Thames. We walk. He moves as noiselessly as a thief. I’m limping a little. Shin splints. In an attempt to seize control of this interview, I pull out my pad and write.

‘3 rules. 1 – no speech. 2 – max. 5 words per question. 3 – there are no other rules.’

He nods. We walk. Over the first bridge, onto the gravel, over the second bridge.

I think I handle silence fairly well. I travel and run a lot, and some of the best moments in my life have been spent alone. No, not like that. OK, maybe sometimes like that. But this silence shared with a stranger is – well, to be honest, it’s a little like a first date. You feel the same jitteriness, the same stabbing awareness of personal space. I am suddenly overwhelmed by the urge to talk about something, anything, just to open my mouth and drown everything in meaningless noise.

But I say nothing. We walk. The sun slips silently below the horizon. Then the doubts begin. What if Silence is psychotic? The Edinburgh reviews were full of hushed whispers of teeth-clenching self-harm. What if he chloroforms me? What if he kills me, and dumps my body in the Isis?

I shoot Silence a sidelong glance. He looks perfectly calm. This is his natural habitat. It’s all in your own head, I tell myself, get a grip. Then, in the last dying light of the day, we reach the ruins of Godstow Nunnery. Through the entrance, and into the blasted shell of a side-chapel. The half-moon through the south window is the only light. And it begins.

Ordinarily I would tell contributors never ever to write up interviews as a transcript, but what happened under that silent moon was so strange that there is a kind of objective comfort in those written words. We are what happened, they say, everything else is in your head.

Q1. ‘Reality abuse?’

Half a minute’s pause. Then he writes. ‘People no longer experience silence… It is the most concise way to describe what is done.’
I think a while, then underline the word ‘abuse’ twice and hand over the pad of paper. Wrong question. Silence holds up a finger. He opens his bag, takes out a three-inch nail, and wipes it carefully with a cotton pad. He indicates that I should test it. It’s real. Then he takes out a hammer. I test it. It’s real. Then he gazes at a point about two feet to the left of my face, and inserts the nail up his left nostril at an angle of about 30 degrees below the horizontal. Tap. Tap. Tap. He sniffs, blinks. Tap. Tap.

Q2. Is that what silence is?

‘Silence is a medium that helps you appreciate.’

Q3. How many get it?

‘It is not discrete. Everyone understands differently.’

Q4. Are people afraid of silence/s1l3nc3?

He just looks at me. I cross out people and write ‘you.’ He flips the pad over, and points to rule 2. ‘Max. 5 words per question.’ OK, fine.

Q5. You read minds?

‘I listen in the silence.’ Pause. ‘Book.’

He asked me to bring a book. I take Aldous Huxley’s ‘Crome Yellow’ out of my bag. Silence produces a copy of this week’s Cherwell, and opens it to page 3, where he has written in thick black marker, ‘As a journalist, it is your job to choose your words carefully.’ Page 5. ‘But how random are these words?’ He asks me to initial a card, then writes on it and puts it on the ground. ‘(For later)’.

Page 9 asks me to memorise the first word of page 66 of my book. ‘Lady.’ Then he makes me choose a three digit number at random, and to memorise the first word of that page from his book. Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Page 352. ‘Today.’ Finally, I am asked to pick a random and unconnected third word. For no good reason, the word ‘German’ pops into my head.

Silence gestures that I should pick up the card from the ground. It reads, ‘German.’ Next, he studies me carefully, and writes on a second card. Lady. Third, and finally, he indicates that I should turn to page 29 of Cherwell. In my own article – my own damn article! – he had already ringed the word ‘today.’ What an utter bastard. Finally, on page 31, one last word: ‘RANDOM?’

He’s winning this. Get your own back.

Q6. Does that always work?

‘No.’

Great. More predictable than most.

One last question. Who owns s1l3nc3?

He thinks for the better part of a minute.

‘It is a part of every human mind.

‘And always will be.’

I feel stupid and banal, like a child. All along, I’d been fighting for control of silence, while Silence himself was just standing there and listening. I have a sudden vision of myself from the outside: pushing, shouldering, vying, always pushing to win everything. It passes in a flash. Is this what silence is?

We shake hands, and walk off into the night.

S1l3nc3 will be performing on Thursday of 2nd week at the Keble O’Reilly, 7.30pm

Review: Self Preserved While The Bodies Float Up

0

As far as album titles go, Self Preserved While The Bodies Float Up is as puzzling as the band’s new musical direction. At its core, the album elaborates on the band’s characteristic mean streak, on their tense heavy riffs and painstakingly complex drumming. The result is dark and brooding. It is more reminiscent of Homage To A Shame than of Saturday Morning Breakfast Show; more of the hardcore, less of serene post-rock soundscapes. Sure, it’s crafted with trademark Oceansize quality, but it lacks that certain poise and unfortunately poses as their second unmemorable release in recent memory (along with last year’s Home And Minor EP).

Despite personal preferences, one really cannot fault their live show. The two hundred-odd lucky people at the O2 Academy earlier this month were treated to a beautifully worked set; a collage of their louder tracks that spanned prog, metal, and their own distinct sound. The sound they achieved on stage was rather impressive; it was dominating and crisp. Simply put, they had it down to a tee. It was if they’d been practising that set for years.

Oceansize opened in a typically vivacious manner with two songs from the new album: ‘Part Cardiac’ and ‘Build Us A Rocket…’. This was followed by more familiar songs from yesteryears, the most notable of which was the fans’ favourite ‘Music For A Nurse’. The sweet tones and slow graceful crescendos of the latter provided such a delicate contrast to what preceded. Its low, peaceful drones and earnest vocals rightfully had the audience under a spell.

Oceansize then returned to Self Preserved… with ‘Silent/Transparent’, the first really energizing song of the evening. The rest of Oceansize’s set consisted exclusively of tracks from their last two albums, including a rare performance of the menacing ‘Paper Champion’. ‘Ornament/Last Wrongs’ – ten minutes of their warmest, most soulful output – put the icing on the cake to finish the evening. The song is a full-bodied opus, grand in every way.

In the five years that I’ve been a fan, Oceansize are yet to let me down in the live arena. Although Self Preserved… wasn’t entirely to my taste, the gig certainly helped me to appreciate it. This heavier album seems like something they wanted to get out of their system, and I’ll always maintain that the calmer, more affecting post-rock of the early albums is their forte. But personal preferences aside, it is safe to say the Mancunians know what they’re doing when playing live.

Ionesco’s Play Is A Lesson For Us All

0

Opening a play in first week is a formidable task, but it is one that the team of The Lesson seem to pull off. The play centres on a Pupil and a Professor, in a one-act that amuses, excites and confuses the audience as we try to figure out what is actually going on. The Professor becomes increasingly frustrated with the Pupil’s failure to comprehend basic arithmetic and her inability to ‘reason it out’. She can only recite and remember, she cannot understand the ‘whys’ or the ‘hows’.

This should not be interesting but, somehow, it is. And this is due predominantly to a superb performance by Olivia Madin. Her childlike innocence is utterly beguiling and her fixed smile disguises the mind the audience longs to read. Stock phrases like ‘very good Sir, thank you Sir’ and ‘Oh Sir’ in Madin’s mouth become completely bewildering and captivating.

Max Fletcher’s performance as the Professor, although less immediately convincing, will surely develop over the next week. Though the characterisation may need more work, there are touches of brilliance here. Fletcher’s strongest moments are in an emotive speech where he discusses the constructs of the world, his voice powerfully cracking on the term ‘civilization’: a nice touch by the director, Sam Bell, on the futility of existence and society.
Staging is often a challenge in a play with such a small cast (the Professor’s Maid is later introduced as the third and final character but had not yet been blocked into the action at the time of press preview), as it is sometimes difficult to maintain audience interest with repetitive movement. However, I found the use of the table (the one landmark on the otherwise stark set), quite powerful. It becomes a barrier between the two characters with Madin’s seated constancy contrasting nicely with Fletcher’s incessant pacing. When he breaks this barrier, leans over the table, and touches her hand, the palpably erotic and oddly aggressive effect is well structured.

I would like to have seen more effective use of the pauses so integral to Ionesco’s script but this should come as confidence develops over the next week. In summary, this is a well considered, carefully constructed and powerful piece that should kick off our theatrical season in style. Madin herself is certainly one to watch over the next year.

Progressive after all?

0

This newspaper produced an issue this week that formed a wholesale attack on the Browne Report and its recommendations. Though well-meaning, such an attack was wrong. A new IFS report shows that the Browne proposals actually function almost identically to a graduate tax, and the further fees rise the more tax-like Browne becomes. Moreover, fee raising will have absolutely no negative effect on low earning graduates – indeed it might save some of them money.

 

Press coverage of Browne naturally focused on the removal of a tuition fee cap, and filled newspaper pages with doom and gloom pictures of an elitist US system. However hidden within a report I doubt most journalists have read, are measures designed to protect those who go on to earn less than their graduate peers. The interest rate charged, for example, is tiered according to income, so those with high earnings (above £28,000) pay a full 2.2% above inflation whilst those earning below £21,000 pay no such premium. Most students will have their debt simply written of after 30 years, freeing them from the burden of repayments they hadn’t yet made. Indeed the IFS report shows that this is a far more progressive alternative to the status quo, and protects the worst off just as effectively as a full scale tax.

 

The key difference between Browne and a graduate tax, is that a fee based system maintains a link between student and university. Where fees are charged, the money paid by graduates goes to the university that educated them, allowing some freedom for institutions from the whims of government. A graduate tax on the other hand, pours all money into a central pot for government distribution, placing universities wholly at the mercy of fickle policymakers.

 

Fee is a nasty word, and it rightly scares us into protecting those who are placed most at risk by them. However if we are going to allow more people to access university, we have to pay for it. Unlimited fees are on their own the most dangerous of beasts; but when restrained and remoulded to extract more from those most able to pay, and to relieve those most in need from the burden of debt, they can allow us to ensure top quality university education for those who follow us without confining the least fortunate to a lifetime of unbearable debt.

The Clothing of a Connecticut Yankee in Oxford

0

Every day, from the time we groggily hit the snooze buttons on our alarm clocks ’til we fall back into bed at night, the choices we make define us. It’s not just the big, life-altering decisions that have the power to change our lives forever; the small things, the little details, that make us who we are can contribute to how others perceive us and function as a sign of who we are, who we have been, and who we might grow to be. While it might seem cliché to say that first impressions are everything, appearances at first sight do play a large role in such self-determination. And it is clothes which contribute to the making of our appearances.

Attending Oxford, a university in an ancient city more than 3,500 miles away from the place I call home, has only given greater clarity to my understanding of this fact. Born in New York and raised in Connecticut, the values I was imbued with as a child and the culture I was immersed in for eighteen years made me the person I am today. They also marked me with attributes that set me apart when I was transplanted here, to a community less homogenous in addition to being foreign.

The very clothes I wear out of long-formed habit are some of the most visible markers, from head to toe. Starting with grosgrain-ribbon headbands, followed by polo shirts and oxfords covered by cable-knit sweaters and Shep shirts, which sit atop madras skirts or Nantucket reds or corduroy or khaki across which a pattern of tiny whales march, culminating in Sperry Top-Siders, scuffed and patched with duct tape, or L.L. Bean moccasins.

Even seasonal pieces serve as indicators, whether tartan wool pea coats in winter or brightly patterned Lilly Pulitzer shift dresses in summer. Classic clothes which last forever are an all-encompassing hallmark, with wardrobe choices bypassing the trendy, tacky, and synthetic in favour of the durable and timeless. Monogrammed totes, J. Press ties, colourful flip-flops, and strands of pearls all blend together in an amalgam of prepdom.

Other, less obvious signs, from where you went to school and college, to your city or town of origin, to the sports you play or the places you’ve travelled, right down to your family and friends, are even truer gauges. But the attire you are garbed in forms a first impression, and can in itself give away many of these details, if the observer has something to connect them to. At home in New England or New York, up and down the eastern seaboard, this kind of appearance is a dead giveaway of such things.

But here in Oxford, there’s a little more of a mystery surrounding it, at both ends. Fellow Connecticut native Heather Mayer, a student at St. Hilda’s, says “it was strange at first to realize last Trinity term that the people around me weren’t also wearing madras skirts or Rainbow flip-flops.” Even though the knowledge that most of the world doesn’t dress like this and doesn’t care about people who do is always present, the actualization of this thought is somewhat more hard-hitting. According to Mayer, it can also be somewhat “refreshing”; when she looks at photographs from her time at Groton, a boarding school in New England, seeing all of the “skinny girls in Lilly Pulitzer and Jack Rogers with straight hair” can seem suffocating, after being in a more diverse environment.

For those who subscribe to the lifestyle which was memorialized in the 1980 tongue-in-cheek classic, The Official Preppy Handbook, and brought into the millennial era in this year’s True Prep: It’s A Whole New Old World, published by Lisa Birnbach, one of the original book’s authors, studying and living in Oxford can feel as if this new old world is still swirling around and settling into the new millennium. The best advice that can be given is to keep one’s attitude firmly tongue-in-cheek, just as the authors did; after all, preppies commandeered the Tea Party slogan for a farcical YouTube video well before anyone else in America did the same for political purposes!

In fact, the best course of action for preppies in Oxford attempting to explain their choice of wardrobe might be to direct friends to that video, which can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYKNJehC5Sk&feature=related. While they might do well to forewarn them of the exaggerated and highly ironic nature of many of the activities and much of the behaviour, the illustrative garments would be illuminating.