Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 1992

Poor JCRs £90,000 worse off

JCR accounts display massive disparities in Common Room wealth across the University, with annual spending in different colleges amounting to some £90,000 variation.

The average JCR Budget is around £32,840 per annum, although some JCRs are directly responsible for college sports funding which burdens this budget. Those JCRs with the largest budgets primarily come from student-run money-making enterprises, such as Hertford’s bar.

Hertford College has an annual JCR Budget of approximately £100,000 compared to Oriel’s meagre £9,300 a year. Hertford’s Entz budget of £10,000 a year is therefore greater than Oriel’s entire budget. This allows the JCR to provide discounts, including subsidised £1 tickets to the popular student Wednesday club-night at Lava & Ignite.

Their wealth also allows Hertford to provide a large amount of money for welfare. Its welfare budget of £10,000 is more than double the funds provided by every other college surveyed, while St Peter’s budget is around the £500 mark.

Other JCRs have claimed that financial difficulties have led to the decision to disaffiliate from OUSU. Oriel JCR Treasurer, James Pickering, commented on how disaffiliation has freed up funds. He noted that by “being disaffiliated from OUSU we have been able to cut such costs as welfare and Michaelmas expenditure significantly.”

OUSU membership costs can be expensive. When Trinity JCR disaffiliated in Hilary Term 2007, one of the arguments in favour of disaffiliation cited that the costs involved in affiliation amounted to around a third of the JCR Budget.

This problem may be resolved if OUSU goes ahead with proposed changes to its funding structure.

The accounts show that JCRs vary extensively in their spending priorities. One notable difference is the amount donated to charities. Queens was found to be one of the most charitable colleges, giving away around £11,000 a year. This is only £3,000 less than St Peter’s entire JCR Budget.

Comparing charitable giving is difficult as it can further vary term on term. For example, instead of its usual termly contribution of £1,100 to its chosen charities, St Hilda’s JCR outlined plans to donate £1,400 straight off to the Haiti earthquake cause.

Oxford University denied that it would ever consider a centralised funding system as a way of ridding the current collegiate funding system of variations in JCR budgets and college wealth.

A spokesperson said that “any variations are outweighed by the benefits to students of the college system.” They further commented that “colleges do participate in a wealth redistribution scheme already.” They went on to say that all students receive the “same treatment in essential matters” in terms of courses, lectures, and library resources.

Every JCR that responded to Cherwell investigations was keen to stress its commitment to making the most of whatever funding they have available to them.

Mark O’Brien, St Catz Treasurer, stressed that the JCR committee’s main role was “to bring their enthusiasm and passion” to the job by “giving as much of our time and effort as we can, not by how much we spend.”

St Catz has turned to entrepreneurial techniques of raising capital. The college sought support from local restaurants and businesses to provide for events in Freshers’ Week. The JCR also intends to implement a discount card based exclusively for St Catz students by working with these businesses.
The evidence of JCR disparities comes just weeks before colleges publish their annual accounts.

Sikh Temple ordered to close

Oxford’s only Sikh Temple, or Gurdwara, faces closure after it failed to obtain planning permission for an extension.

The Gurdwara, located on the ground floor of 69 Cherwell Drive in Marston, acts as a community centre for Sikhs in Oxford. It has been used as a temple for the past three years.

Priya Atwal, President of the Sikh Society at the University, believes this threat of closure “damages Oxford’s reputation as a city that can accommodate for a diverse set of students.”

The extension was added to the bottom floor of the house to create space as the temple aims to provide services to all members of the community. For example, it will give a meal to anyone who asks for one.

It is claimed that the elderly couple who own the property, and who allow it to be used as a temple, did not realise that planning permission was needed for the extension. Although they applied for retrospective permission, Oxford City Council rejected the application.

The Council also rejected an application for the building to be officially changed from a place of residence to a place of worship.

Further problems arose when residents stated that they were unhappy with the congestion caused by the Gurdwara. Nearly 100 residents signed a petition opposing the planning application.

The Council gave the temple six months to close down and find a new location. However, due to a shortage of funds, this has not been possible.
The planning application was refused on the grounds of parking problems and noise disturbance to the neighbours.

In an interview with Oxford Mail, Councillor Graham Swift commented, “The problem with anything on Cherwell Drive is the amount of traffic and parking that would be generated. Planning permission should be given before building work is carried out – and where that doesn’t happen a strong line should be taken, or there would be chaos.”

On Monday, there was an appeal hearing, and the Council went to review the location. They have told the temple that they will make a decision in the next seven weeks.

Mr Singh, head of the Committee at the Gurdwara, stated that he would “like the Council to reconsider their position. We can only move with the help of the council, if they can give us a grant or find us an unused building to use.”

The temple is a focal point in the Oxford Sikh community, and it is used by many members of the University. The Sikh population in Oxford is quite small, and its size is greatly affected by the number of Sikhs in each new year group.

Atwal explained that the temple was important to Sikh Oxford students.”Several of our students visit the Gurdwara regularly to pray and help out within the local Sikh community. We feel that there should be somewhere for Sikh students to worship just as there is for students of any other faith.”

She further commented, “We must remember that many students from all over the world come to study at Oxford University. Taking away Oxford’s Gurdwara might discourage future students from wanting to come here as they cannot worship, like in other University cities.”

Time for some explanations

Stuart Cullen at the Union has got back to me with an explanation of the absent speakers who were promised for this term (see last post). The explanation basically boils down to this: they promised they would come, then later changed their minds, either because of scheduling issues or other reasons (it’s not entirely unknown for speakers to get cold feet). I can believe this. Unfortunately, the Union is rarely a truly high profile venue nowadays (if it ever was). Oxford is a long way to come, both for speakers and any journalists who might want to cover them. When speakers agree to visit, it may be because they’re curious about such an eccentric institution, because they have fond memories of student days in Oxford, or because they just enjoy speaking to groups of intelligent students. But for most of them, it’s fairly low down on their list of priorities, and so if something else comes up, it’s often the Oxford event that gets scrapped. This appears to be what happened with Carol Vorderman, Sir Peter Maxwell Davies, and Gerhard Schroeder (on the other hand, they might have just changed their mind and used scheduling as an excuse).

 

One thing that is worth noting, though, is that of the three, only Vorderman promised to come on a specific date – the others just gave vague intentions to come at some time during the term. When a speaker does this, I think it’s a bit optimistic to claim that they are ‘confirmed for Hilary,’ when it’s perfectly possible that what they actually meant was ‘no, not now, but I might have some free time in a few months so call me then and I’ll think about it.’  Whether that was the case with these speakers I don’t know (and probably nor does anyone apart from them and their staff). So it looks like when these speakers were announced it was all done in good faith, but future Librarians’ offices might want to consider holding off announcing a speaker as ‘confirmed’ until they have a definite date and time. I’ve reproduced Stuart’s email to me below.

 

Dear Conan,

 

The reasons for the withdrawals are as follows:

 

General David Petraeus: We heard on November 18th that he would be unable to come because they’d had a change in their travel plans for February. I’ve got a print out of the email in my office if you’d like to come get it.

 

Gerhard Schroeder: over the Summer he confirmed that he would speak in either January or February. We were in contact with him throughout Michaelmas to find a date and on December 15th were informed by his office that he would unfortunately be too busy until the summer, when he is hoping to come and speak. I am happy to send you the emails but given its in German it might be a bit pointless. Also printed out in my office though.

 

Sir Peter Maxwell Davies: was in touch with President-elect Laura Winwood about coming in Hilary and said he would do so, but unfortunately was unable to find a specific date when we tried to pin one down. I’ll ask Laura to get you the emails.

 

Carol Vorderman: Had confirmed to speak on February 22nd but then had to change to a date later in March. We then tried to pin down a date, but I received an email on December 22nd saying that it would not be possible due to “a couple of big project launches Carol is not going to be available at all during the first three months of next year.  She sends her apologies.” I’ve got print outs of the emails in my office if you’d like to come have a look.

 

As you know, having been on committee, term in term out we host a range of speakers that no other student society in the world can compete with. It is a fact of life that the type of people we invite have incredibly busy and fluid schedules and the longer the time is between the date of a booking and the date of the speech, the greater the possibility is of a speaker pulling out. The Christmas vacation gives 3 weeks of working time, when you take out Christmas holidays. In that time, we organised eleven debates and fifty individual speakers. In first week alone, over 450 people came to the first debate, and three of our speakers (Graydon Carter, Imran Khan and Katie Melua) had an audience of over 200. Simon Singh had an audience of over 150 – and that’s in one week. We have 22 Members of Parliament, 7 Peers, 5 members of the Government and 4 members of the Shadow Cabinet all coming in the run-up to a General election. Incubus, Katie Melua, MC Hammer and Duffy (and another big act that’s going to confirm in the next couple of days) on the music front, is quite impressive. This is, by any standards, a good term of speakers, of debates and of socials, and its a going to be a good term for the Union.

 

Sincerely,

 

Stuart

Something to watch

In an age where hardly a day goes by without some mention of violence, bombing, and terror in the news, fear and a constant sense of anticipation has gripped the world. It is exactly this uncertainty of what our future holds that lets every member of the audience relate to Frank McGuinness’ Someone Who’ll Watch Over Me.

The play, set in a Lebanese prison cell in the late 20th century, features three hostages: Michael (Sam Smith) an English university lecturer transformed by the death of his wife; Edward (David Egan) an Irish journalist torn from his family; and Adam (Jacob Lloyd) an American military doctor removed from his fiancée.

Their nationalities strongly shape their respective characters, which allows a clash not only between characters, but also creates an internal conflict as each man begins to question their own identity. From reading the Qur’an to singing Irish folksongs and American hymns, each character’s individuality is repeatedly underlined.

Being drawn into the cell itself, one is constantly exposed to the drastic ups and downs, moments of outrage and violence followed by eerie calm, desperation followed by ecstatic ‘parties’ and extravagance of their daily lives.

Each of the three well-cast characters has been meticulously polished; involving the audience from the moment the first word is spoken. Though the set and lighting remain constant throughout the play, director Roland Singer-Kinsmith’s rendition successfully highlights the juxtaposition of light and dark; of sanity and insanity. Ironically, the audience is left to contemplate that ultimately, we may not be so different after all.

Four Stars

A Humorous Rhinoceros

First-time directors Lewis Godfrey and Sofia Abasolo haven’t made life easy for themselves.

Deciding to put on Ionesco’s masterpiece is brave enough, what with all the turning into Rhinoceroses and all. But to cut it down to an hour and put it in the not-so-spacious BT – lacking the room for the orchestra pit, two storey house and twenty rhinoceros heads that the original script demands – is surely suicidal.

But all the more credit to them, because this looks to be a damn good production. The line cutting, although necessary, is unfortunate in that some gems are inevitably lost; but otherwise they have used the limitations to their advantage, experimenting playfully with what was already a pretty unorthodox play. The emphasis on physicality not only makes up for the lack of fake horns and grey skin, it’s ultimately more effective – particularly the genuinely spine-tingling finale.

One experiment had me worried, however, for the words ‘audience participation’ usually bring to mind horrifying sing-a-long performances of The Sound of Music. But fortunately here it kind of works. This is where the traverse seating – another risky choice – comes into its own, as the guy across the room whose eye contact you’ve been avoiding becomes one of a theatre full of Rhinoceroses. Still, don’t sit at the front if you don’t want your face used as a TV.

All this meant a lot was riding on the actors. Again, there’s little to fault, with a solid ensemble cast. David Ralf is very entertaining as the mouthy Botard, and mountains of praise are due to Arabella Lawson, who not only plays two men, but actually metamorphoses on stage – and does so brilliantly. Matt Monaghan as the lead man needs a little more consistency, but I’m sure he’ll get it by production week, for he showed moments of great promise and on the whole seems comfortable in his role.

Rhinoceros so happens to be a pretty profound and thought-provoking play, but don’t let that put you off. It’s not necessarily laugh-out-loud, but the production has done well to maintain the comic element which was so central to much of the Ionesco’s theatre. After all, it’s about a town full of people turning into pachyderms, and as one character says, ‘You’ve got to have a sense of humour about these things.’

Four Stars

Rhinoceros is at the BT, 2-6 Feb, 19.30

Oriel students form gleeful club

Students at Oriel are setting up their own glee club inspired by the popular TV show Glee.

The proposal was presented as a motion to a JCR meeting originally as a bit of a joke. However, Ben Bluemel, one of the proposers said, “The response to the idea has been incredible.”

Bluemel hopes the club will help bring members of the college together, and pointed out there were all sorts of students involved, including sportspeople and non-sportspeople, in the same spirit as the show.

An ex-member of the very successful Oxford a capella group Out of the Blue will be helping them put together and practice their first number. They will be performing a mash-up of With or Without You and Don’t Stop Believing at their next JCR meeting.

“There’s a lot of pressure,” commented Bluemel. They hope the popularity of the club will inspire other colleges to set up groups for them to rival or, at least, to crew date.

Disappearing speakers

It’s been noticed by several people that last term we were promised that a number of speakers who couldn’t come in

Michaelmas were ‘confirmed for Hilary,’ including Gerhard Schroeder and Carol Vorderman. Of course, they’re now not in the termcard. No explanation so far, but as soon as I can get hold of Stuart I’ll post it up. My money’s simply on no-one remembering to ring them and confirm a date.

First night: The Magic Toyshop

To be honest, if you haven’t heard about this show by now, you must have been living under a stone, working far too hard, or not reading Cherwell (shame on you if so). So I won’t bore you by recapping what it’s all about. Three orphaned children must go to London to live with their mysterious uncle Philip in his London toyshop, where he rules as tyrant and master, forcing them to watch his sinister puppet shows. While it might be very easy to think that, from the hype, this play might be an example of style triumphing over substance, I am happy to report that, though this play is stylish and visually stunning, it demonstrates a consistently high quality of acting, and as a production, reaches a level of polished togetherness that is to be applauded.

Bella Hammad shines as Melanie, our fifteen-year-old female protagonist, whose perilous and prematurely instigated ascent into adulthood forms the structural backbone of the piece. For an actress so new to Oxford’s scene, she has truly gripped it fervently and, judging by this performance, will become one of our most in-demand performers. She manages to capture the character’s paradoxical attributes of cautious innocence, enforced maturity and sexual curiosity, while still maintaining a great deal of humour. She spends much time alone on the stage, especially in the first act, but her great confidence and believability as an actress lends her a presence that I certainly relished. At the other end of the scale, Will Spray must be mentioned for delivering a truly terrifying performance as Uncle Philip.

The original score by Hertford second-year Laurence Osbourn is written for string quartet, which worked well, despite my previous suspicion that a show so fantastical and at times zany would need more instrumental colour. The score channels Shostakovich’s quartets quite strongly, definitely bringing out a certain sobriety and mournfulness, but also creating a sense of disquieting timelessness. However, though I very much enjoyed the fractured, relentless counterpoint of the score, I found some of the recorded sound effects unnecessary and haphazard, especially the lengthy plane noises and shaken radio sounds at the beginning. It was also a shame that the climax of the play – the uncomfortably beautiful swan scene – was let down by the choice of the Swan Lake Prelude to accompany it. It seemed a lazy choice, and I wonder whether Osbourn might have been able to come up with something more fitting, referencing the Tchaikovsky, instead of simply blasting the piece into the audience.

Choreographer Fionn Cox-Davies is largely successful in his attempts to make puppets come to life on stage, though sometimes the female puppets lacked the presence of Joel Phillimore’s towering performance. The latter’s movement was excellent the whole way through, while the other two seemed to lose poise from time to time. This doesn’t, however, detract from the fact that the physical aspects of the play are exceptionally tight (despite a few ungainly scene changes) and the very early apple-tree scene is as beautiful and fluid a piece of theatre as I have seen for a very long time.

The Magic Toyshop will always be a boy-meets-girl tale, says Theo Merz, who adapted the play from Angela Carter’s novel. We do get a very strong sense of the romance that underpins the danger, and there is a genuine warmth about the two young lovers that Merz seems to bring out well.

Throughout, I kept having to remind myself that this is a student production, so beautiful and professional was the staging and the use of lighting. The Magic Toyshop is a play whose failings are small, whose methods and ambition have been nothing short of incredible, and which deserves to do well.

Four stars

The Magic Toyshop is at the Oxford Playhouse until Saturday.

 

Back To Basics!

Here at Cherwell Fashion, we’re finding little inspiration for coming trends. Navy has been done to death – it’s hard to miss it on the high street; walk past Miss Selfridges or Topshop, and there will be at least ONE stripey item in the window (however, check out this week’s shoot for our take on the trend). Pastels and nudes – well, again they’re everywhere and are set to stay for a very long time (chiffon dresses in Summer, yes please!). Even a hunt on UK vogue’s website only led us to the male model section (see last week’s Swot:Shop for more details!). But then we realised we were making the one mistake all fashion lovers do in their lives – we were following the trends just a bit too seriously and attempting to second-guess whether a sheepskin coat (à la Keira Knightley) is really fashion or just a resounding statement. So we’ve decided to take things back to basics: and you can’t get any more basic than Uniqlo.

For all those in the depths of fashion siberia, Uniqlo is a mainly – except for the London stores, of course – online shop full of basics. The brand has gone from strength to strength in the last year or so, and scoring Agyness Dean (last year’s model du jour) for their Autumn/Winter ’09 campaign has raised their profile amongst the young and fashion conscious. Their niche: it’s all basics. Don’t go looking for the latest trend (no anchor prints here!), but if you’re in want of something plain and often bright, hit http://www.uniqlo.co.uk/ and shop. The great thing about the clothes is the value: sale cardigans start at £4.99 and dresses are around £30. Also, as January still seems to be persistent on bringing cold chills, Uniqlo’s HEATTECH range has invested in ‘seven technologies’ to keep you warm, dry and not shivering in lectures. Our advice, stock up on your basics and get layering. Here are our favourite picks:

 

Ponte Dress, £24.99

 

 

Tailored Blazer, £29.99 

 

 

Tapered Jeans, £19.99

 

 

Shawl Cardigan, £14.99

 

The Cherwell Fashion Guide to… Nautical Sailor Tailoring

Sally Rushton shows you how the nautical trend for this Spring can be dressed up – or down – on a student budget.