Friday 19th September 2025
Blog Page 2013

Eye off the ball at Balliol and LMH

0

Fears were raised at LMH recently as pranksters circulated a mass email warning that the LMH Arcadia Ball was also called off.

Following the cancellation of Balliol Ball during the vacation, many were concerned that Lady Margaret’s would meet a similarly disappointing fate.

 The prank came about after the Ball Committee sent an email to all those who had bought non-dining tickets, but did not hide the list of email recipients. 317 people received the prank message, sent at 1.30am last Sunday morning.

Thankfully for the 650 ball-goers who have already bought tickets, the story is not true.

“Please do not refund your dresses in panic, and be assured that this will not be taken lightly by the Ball Committee”, said Ball Secretary Emily Roberts, in a follow-up email headed ‘Damage Control’.

The prank certainly ruffled some feathers among LMH members, who had paid £130 for dining tickets, or £90 for non-dining. The spoof message “regretted to announce the cancellation of the LMH Ball” and assured students that they were “trying to organise refunds”.

 The message was particularly surprising for first-year History student at LMH, Ewan Short. The email was sent from [email protected] – an email address that has nothing to do with him.

“At first I thought I might have sent the prank email”, Short told Cherwell, “because I remembered being quite drunk that night. But then I quickly realised it wasn’t from me. I think it was probably some third years who set up the account and sent the emails.”

Short thought it unlikely that the joke caused any serious distress. “I don’t think anyone in LMH would have attached any credibility to the email, because to be honest, I don’t have any credibility. But some recipients at other colleges may have thought it was serious.”
 
The real senders of the email have since come forward and apologised to the Ball Committee for the confusion.
 
Presidents of the Ball Committee, Charles Streeten and Emily Stott, were happy to accept the apology. “It’s water under the bridge now, and both College and the Ball Committee are satisfied it has been dealt with satisfactorily,” they said.
 
College authorities, JCR representatives and the Ball Committee were keen to play down the prank. Roberts said, “I could count on the fingers of two hands the number of people who thought it was serious”.

JCR President, Genevieve Clark, added “it wasn’t funny for the people involved, but everyone felt very quickly reassured that the ball will still be happening”.
 
This prank cancellation email is reminiscent of the apologetic online message from the Balliol Ball Committee, who actually did have to cancel the Balliol Ball last week, due to “underwhelming ticket sales”.
Balliol The Ball Secretary said “we were unable to sell enough tickets to even approach breaking even.”
It is reported that the Balliol Ball Committee spent a large proportion of its budget securing DJ Yoda as a headline act.

 

 

Oxford students godlier than most

0

Students at Oxford are more likely to convert to evangelical Christianity than those at less prestigious universities, according to new research.

This is due to the high pressure and stressful environment at Oxford, and the fact that Oxford students are inherently more creative than average.

The hypothesis was put forward by Dr Edward Dutton, a researcher for the Finnish Lutheran Church. Dutton claims that “students from state schools where [sic] over-represented amongst those who became Christians while at Oxford”. He attributes this to the mind-broadening effects of gap years on private school students.

Ellen Harvey, a Magdalen undergraduate involved in the Christian community, attacked Dr Dutton’s hypothesis. “The fundamental flaw with his argument is that it excludes God, assuming that someone becomes a Christian because of solely human factors, the influence of other Christians, psychological impulses… It is astonishing that in an extensive bibliography the Bible has not been referenced”.

To this claim, Dr Dutton responded, “This is a piece of social scientific research which draws upon the empirical method at the heart of science. The existence of the Christian god – by its very nature – cannot be proven empirically or, entirely, disproven. It is a doctrine of faith you can take or leave, something which stands in contrast to the scientific position.”

Dr Dutton himself was careful to downplay his findings. “Obviously, at this stage, and as I stress in the paper, there is a degree to which the intelligence research is speculative. But it is, I think, a plausible observation in light of the evidence so far accrued by myself and others”.
Other Oxford academics are skeptical about the conclusions that Dr Dutton has drawnfrom his research.

Dr Justin Barratt, an Oxford experimental psychologist working on cognitive science of religion, said, “I applaud the attempt to bring social, cognitive, neuro-, and evolutionary sciences together, but I don’t find the result compelling in this case …The paper reads more like an intelligent speculation based on some preliminary findings than a rigorous and compelling scientific study.”

Dr Dutton conceded that his results should not be taken too seriously. He insisted “I entirely agree that the case is not proven yet…[but]there is a strong tradition of ‘intelligent speculation’ in the sciences, justified because it provokes debate and may take us closer to the truth. To really prove it – or disprove it – we would, of course, need to conduct a major survey of student religious experiences, intelligence and creativity.”

The paper was published in the Romanian online “Journal for Interdisciplinary Research on Religion and Science”. It draws on interviews conducted by Dr Dutton with 25 members of OUICCU, the university-wide Christian union, as well as similar interviews at three other universities.

 

Volca-no way to get home

0

The return of students and staff to Oxford this week was severely disrupted as volcanic ash forced the cancellation of flights in and out of the UK.
The flight ban caused problems for those finalists who were due to sit official University examinations in 0th week. Other Universities, including Cambridge, postponed examinations till later in the term.

However, Oxford stated that the exams would proceed as planned.
A spokesperson for the Faculty of Ancient and Modern Languages commented that “All those unable to attend [their examinations] have been referred to the proctors”.

Despite the flight ban being lifted on Tuesday night, many international students were unable to return in time for their collections on Friday and Saturday.
There were complaints from affected students that the University had not handled the situation well.

One student said that they had “no idea what will happen with my collections, or whether my college will charge me for this week’s residence.
“Generally, I think that both the University and College could be a bit more helpful, because clearly I’m not the only one who has this kind of problem”.
Other students were more upbeat about the situation.

Second-year Somerville student Matt Waksman, who was stranded in Jerusalem, said, “I’ll just have to catch up on collections and work when I’m back, there’s nothing I can do and I haven’t received any official advice from Oxford.

“At the moment I’m planning on getting to Rome next week and hoping to get home from there. More promising is Brown’s announcement that they will fly UK Citizens stranded outside of Europe to Spain, where they will be picked up by the British Navy.”

The disruption is not just affecting students and tutors.
There were worries that former Bond actor Sir Roger Moore’s appearance at the Oxford Union might have to be cancelled. However, the Union assuaged member’s fears, stating that the talk will still go ahead this week, as he was able to reschedule his flight from Paris.

The Bodleian Library’s copy of the Magna Carta had also fallen victim to the ash cloud, becoming stranded in New York after an Oxford Alumni event in the city’s Waldorf Astoria hotel.

Due to the unexpected delay in travelling, the 1217 copy of the Magna Carta has been put on public display in The Morgan Library in New York from the 21st of April to the 30th of May.

Richard Ovenden, Keeper of Special Collections at the Bodleian Library, who is accompanying Magna Carta in New York, commented, “We realised that a public exhibition was the silver lining to this particular ash cloud.”
The 800-year-old document had never left the country before.

 

India Lenon, stuck in Hong Kong

I was on a family holiday in Hong Kong which was meant to end on Friday 16th April, but our flight was the very first to be cancelled. This wasn’t so much of a problem for me, with the start of term almost a week away, but my sister’s term started the next day and she’s sitting her A-levels in a few weeks.

We had to decide whether to stick it out in Hong Kong or to try to get back by other means – but getting trains or boats would have taken weeks, and all the flights to anywhere near Britain were fully booked until June.
We spent five extra days in Hong Kong, at a cost of about £1,000 per day, which was less than fantastic.

On Wednesday we were woken at 4am by a phone call from Air New Zealand, who had put us on the first flight back out because we had been waiting so long. They said that we should get to the airport as quickly as possible, so unwashed and barely awake we bundled into a taxi.

The airline had clearly decided to prioritise families and old people, so we were lucky to get onto the flight.
When we finally landed in Heathrow all the passengers cheered, which was fairly cringeworthy but proof of the relief everyone felt. Arrivals was full of news crews filming us all arriving, but due to our unwashed state we hurried on past.

 

Radio 4 boss new Peter’s head

0

Mark Damazer will leave the BBC in October to take up the position of Principal of St. Peter’s College. The position has been vacant since the departure of Professor Bernard Silverman at the end of 2009.

The position, which has been renamed from Master to Principal, comes with a reported £90,000 salary, house and free meals.

Mr Damazer’s arrival follows a recent trend of colleges shunning dons in favour of civil servants, journalists and other figures. St Hilda’s, Corpus Christi and Trinity have all appointed non-academics to helm them in the last four years.
The recruitment process began after Professor Silverman’s surprise resignation letter in February 2009 Professor Silverman is now Chief Scientific Adviser to the Home Office.

Speaking to Cherwell, Mr Damazer explained how the time seemed right to leave broadcasting. “It was not at all planned until I applied for this job. It got to year 6 [at Radio 4] and I hadn’t looked at anything else. Academic life fascinated me…when I sat down and thought about it, [being Principal] was what I wanted to do.”

A JCR delegation first met with head-hunters Russell Reynolds early in Michaelmas term 2009 to outline the qualities they wanted in their new Principal.

Late in Hilary term 2010, the JCR President, Vice-President and President-Elect met each of the six shortlisted candidates and provided feedback to a member of the selection committee.

JCR President, Daniel Stone, said “I wanted someone who could understand things from the point of view of students, someone who was good at communicating and who could bring the college even closer together… after meeting Mark, I am confident that he has these characteristics and more.”
This level of JCR consultation on senior appointments is gaining ground in Oxford.

Mark Damazer has been in charge of the BBC’s speech network for nearly six years, and is seen by those close to him as an intellectual tiger with a donnish temperament.

Speaking to BBC Oxford, Mr Damazer put it another way. “I have this idea that knowledge and the pursuit of knowledge is an insatiable human need, a lust” he said. “I like the idea of working in the public sector for the public good. Both [the BBC and St Peter’s] are world class institutions.”

Mr Damazer has been careful not to second guess his role at St Peter’s. He commented, “Most of the wisdom and answers lie within the existing body of fellows…I’m not a chief executive – I’m the public face to the University and the outside world.”

Although it is too early for Mr Damazer to lay out his strategy for St Peter’s, he has expressed a wish “to bring aspects of political, cultural and artistic life that I’ve been exposed to in my career into the college”.

The Vice-Master of St Peter’s, Professor Stephen Hasselbo, said in a written statement, “Mark is a multitalented person who has had a very distinguished career within the BBC. All members of College are greatly looking forward to working with him.”

Mr Damazer was an undergraduate at Cambridge where he attained a double-starred first in History. He was a Harkness Fellow at Harvard and is married with two children.

Mark Thompson, Director-General of the BBC and a friend of Mr Damazer, is also thought to be considering a move to academia. .

 

Kebab? Mine’s with 1338 calories

0

Posh Nosh, Hasan’s, Ahmed’s and many, many more – for most students, these celebrated Oxford institutions need no introduction.

The local kebab van is just as integral a part of the University experience as formal halls and essay crises. When it’s late, cold, and you’re feeling a little bit worse for wear, food which would barely pass as edible in the cold light of day suddenly becomes irresistible.

But do students really know what goes into the polystyrene trays that the jolly kebab van proprietors dish up to their clientele?

Most shocking is the customers’ ignorance of just how many calories they are consuming.

A survey conducted by Cherwell showed that 60% of students chose the falafel kebab as the “healthy option”, over chips and the meat kebab.

In fact, we can reveal this dish averaged out at a whopping 1338 calories per portion, over half of the recommended daily allowance for women, and almost the same proportion for men.

The option which is actually the least calorific of the trio, the kebab, was not identified as the healthiest option by any of the respondents.

The average student woefully underestimates how many calories are in a kebab or a portion of chips by up to 50%. When asked to estimate how many calories were in a portion of chips, the average student answered 440 calories.

When the same question was put to kebab lovers, the answer came out at 610 calories.

An investigation conducted by Cherwell reveals the nutritional content of some of the most popular kebab van selections in all their calorific glory.

The results are little short of horrifying.

The average doner kebab at Ahmed’s contained 987 calories, with those sold at Hussein’s not much better, at 930 calories. However, the really surprising result came from that most innocuous of snacks – the chip. Just a single portion of chips at Hussein’s is laden with 1079 calories. A portion of Ahmed’s chips, often seen as the ‘healthier’ choice, has a ‘mere’ 1041.

The vendors of one van estimate that they sell at least 100 portions of chips on a busy night. That’s 107,900 calories that Oxonians attending just a single kebab van are eating every single evening.

And that’s all without sauces.

Bearing in mind that the recommended daily allowance is 2000 calories for a woman and 2500 for men, these figures are quite gruesome.

The level of fat in chips from both vans (averaging out at 70g) was 108% of the recommended daily allowance for a woman, and 88% for a man. Kebabs once more proved their slightly less dubious health credentials, containing 59g of fat (91% RDA for women, and 74% for men).

Despite containing the lowest number of calories out of the three foods tested, the nutritional content of the doner kebabs contained less obvious health risks. Both kebabs contained very high levels of protein – Hussein’s came in at 77g, Ahmed’s at 67g – both of which are well above those recommended for a healthy diet. The average adult male requires 56g per day and the average adult female just 45g.

The issues associated with over-consumption of the types of foods that are sold at kebab vans, include increased risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some forms of cancer.

The analysis of a selection of food from local kebab vans Hussein’s and Ahmed’s was performed by Dr Neil Heppell and Professor Jeya Henry of the Functional Food Centre at Oxford Brookes University. The lab tested portions of Hussein’s chips, doner kebabs and falafel kebabs and Ahmed’s chips and doner kebabs.

However, national studies suggest that Oxford students may have escaped relatively lightly. A study, which sampled 494 kebabs across 76 councils, was published by the Local Authority Coordinators of Regulatory Services in January 2009, revealed that our city traders are by no means offering the unhealthiest fare.

The average kebab in the north-west was 1101 calories, compared to 1084 calories in Scotland, 1055 calories in Wales and 1066 calories in the south-east. By contrast, our local average of 959 calories seems marginally better, and even more so when held up against the button-popping 1990 calories hidden in the nation’s worst offenders.

Natalie Newton, an undergraduate at Christ Church, commented on the results, “This will definitely make me think twice before buying anything from a kebab van again.”

However, for some, it seems that the risk of an expanding waistline will not be enough to deter them from stopping by their local. As one chemistry undergraduate said, “Obviously kebabs aren’t the healthiest thing, but the way I see it, the protein goodness of the doner meat coupled with the carbohydrate of the pitta encompass all that’s needed for a wholesome and balanced diet. Knowing exactly how many calories is in every bite is really not going to stop me from eating them.”

Despite Government attempts to increase public awareness on health issues, it certainly looks like business is booming for kebab vans. Research published by the Food Standards Agency in 2006 found that 18.5% of doner takeaways posed a “significant” threat to public health, and 0.8% posed a threat alarmingly termed as “imminent”. Most definitely food for thought.

Dine Hard: Sojo

0

Sojo, 8 Hythe Bridge Street (moving to 67/69 George Street for Summer 2010)

Sojo is the real deal, and everything about the place is designed to make you think so. Its cool, dark-wooded interior makes a marked contrast to the fairy lights and window displays of the rival ‘Restaurant Paddyfield’ across the road, and the menu, which starts with a self-congratulatory spiel, is encyclopaedic. While such a lengthy menu would usually be an indicator of atrocious food, here it seems authoritative, with the restaurant’s ethnic constitution (we were the only gwai los in the room) bearing happy witness to the fact. Thankfully there is a page of recommendations, and the menu told us that the ‘friendly staff are on hand to help you inform your choice.’ The staff were friendly, and very efficient, but not particularly helpful, and the language barrier was noticeable.

The dim sum was the best I’ve ever had, but still a bit under-whelming, and ‘glutinous rice with chicken’ tasted as bad as it sounds, though ‘glutinous rice with chicken gristle’ would have been a better description. ‘Prawns in salted duck yolk’ was horrible – so salty it had me gurning like a fiend on a Friday night. The highlight of the night was definitely the fantastic Szechuan red pepper beef and glass noodles, the beef acting as seasoning to the delicious spicy broth. The food overall was good but nothing special, though so much looked appetizing – especially the Peking Duck and Mongolian Wok – that I think it’s essential to go in a large group in order to try it all. Sojo’s food is hit-and-miss, but certainly cannot be accused of being inauthentic. So go, but go in a large group to ensure finding something better than so-so.

 

Top 5: Veggie Restaurants

0

5th: Al-shami, 25 Walton Crescent

This Lebanese restaurant has a predictably vegetarian-friendly menu. Stick to the mezze for the best-cooked, and largest range of food: tasty dips and imaginative hot and cold salads. It’s also possible to take-away, for the more discerning fast foodie.

4th: The Vault and Gardens, Radcliffe Square

A great place to sit in the summer, (predictably) in the vaults of the University Church backing on to Radcliffe Square, making it a perfect break from the RadCam. Its canteen style lunchtime fare has three reliable, freshly cooked vegetarian options.

 

3rd: The Gardener’s Arms, 39 Plantation Road

The only entirely vegetarian restaurant on this list, this pub is tucked in the further end of Jericho – but worth the walk even for the laziest! The Garden serves a array of different vegetarian cuisine, from Greek salads and curries, to burgers and Mexican wraps.

2nd: Chutney’s, 36 St Michael’s Street

A classic Indian on Walton Street, which unlike Jamal’s, serves tasty food and is refreshingly devoid of crew-dates. It has a separate menu of vegetarian specials but there are plenty of options on their general menu. Try the South Indian speciality, the Masala Dosa, a rice pancake filled with spicy potato, lentils and chutney.

1st: Manos, 105 Walton Street

This little Greek food delicatessen has a wide selection of salads, hot mezze (the Spanakopita – feta and spinach pastries – are particularly good) as well as traditional Greek oven-cooked dishes like the delicious Iman Bayeldi (garlicky baked aubergine and tomatoes).
There’s space to sit for lunch and dinner, and they even have a garden at the back to help you imagine a possible Mediterranean setting (only advised on a sunny day). You can choose from a great selection of cold salads and dips to takeaway, all accompanied with grilled pitta bread.

Blind Date: Week 1

0

Blind Date is kindly sponsored by the Oxford Retreat, open for lunch, supper and drinks at 1 Hythe Bridge Street.

Christina Haremi,
Magdalen, Law

Restless lawyer, with no sense of time, space or direction (“Never Eat Shredded Wheat”), looking for a man to lead the way.

Tom was in sheer awe when I ordered spiced calf liver to match his fish dish. This revelatory moment aside, we had a mammoth conversation, most of which seemed to boil down to a “gap yah” (not mine), immigration (mine) and the girl from college whom I thought Robert Pattinson was dating (but apparently isn’t).
As the Oxford Retreat grew awkwardly empty, we set off to find somewhere new to continue sharing views on now increasingly abstract topics but ended up in Magdalen looking for the deer, which much to our disappointment were not wearing flashing midnight light bulbs.
In spite of the fact that, throughout the walk back, Tom was patently making fun of my bike basket (very handy for groceries), I had a lovely time and a yummy piece of liver.

Banter: PG-13
Looks: Attractive
Personality: Refreshing & genuine
2nd date? Potentially

Tom Martin,
Wadham, Physics

Perennially searching Physicist, loves world peace, walks on the beach and the house terrapin,  seeks reckless arts student to liven up the long Oxford summer.

The date began with the obligatory photo but thankfully this seemed to be the last awkward moment of the evening.  Once I had bumblingly ordered a bottle of house white the conversation started to flow almost as quickly as the wine. We sauntered effortlessly from Oxford to travel to impressions of a Greek father (a personal highlight) in a well-choreographed conversational dance with Christina gently taking the lead and me happily following. 
Once three hours had trickled by we attempted to find a place to go for a drink but nowhere came through for us so after a fruitless search we went our separate ways, she back to college and I back home to what seemed like a round of 20 questions from over-keen house-mates before I eventually lay down on my Big Fat Greek Bedding (see what I did there?). 

Banter:  Intense, flowing
Looks: Mediterranean, arresting
Personality: Engaging, vivacious
2nd date? Watch this space…

My Home Town: Bramhall, Cheshire

0

Bramhall lies on something called the ‘Cheshire Stockbroker belt’, or so I am always informed on the extremely rare occasions that this odd bastard daughter of Cheshire village and South Manchester suburb (pop. 40,000) makes it into the tabloid press (I think the last time was when probably its most famous resident, George Best, drunk himself into an early grave. Not on account of living here). I’m not sure where they get this ‘stockbroker’ bit from though. Manchester, the nearest town to Bramhall of which most Southerners will have heard, is hardly The City: more Armani Exchange than Stock Exchange in many ways.

Nonetheless, Bramhall is known locally as rather affluent and a pleasant place to live. It’s conservative with quite a small C, but has had a jolly LibDem MP for a while now. If I recall correctly, a study in some nameless provincial University pronounced it the happiest/friendliest/least disagreeable place to live in the country. This is not hard to achieve when your main neighbour is Stockport – a great grey sodden bubo of a town festering in the armpit of industrial North West England. I saw a girl there once trying to break into a car, not realising somebody was sat in it.

Bramhall, by comparison, is a paradise of niceness. Yes, each one of its local pubs has had its personality wallpapered over in patterns of varying degrees of floral, and been filled with as much glass, marble and mid-life crisis as you can imagine; but, like old age, it’s not pretty, but better than the alternative.

I have been harsh so far. And I really oughtn’t to be, since this place has served me and my twenty years well as a ville natale. The schools are numerous and their uniforms brightly coloured. Thankfully I didn’t go to the one whose jumpers were a fetching melange of yellow and brown. They, naturally, were comprehensively bullied. The high school was one of the first to bring sniffer-dogs onto the premises, which was a bit of a novelty; and it also hit the headlines for introducing clip-on ties for health and safety reasons, which earned us a nice dosage of Daily Mail ‘political correctness gone mad’ coverage.

We don’t have theatres; we have no cinema and no art gallery. Queen Elizabeth I once spent the night in Bramall Hall, our only national landmark, and, according to Simon Jenkins, one of the finest examples of Tudor architecture in the country. One evening, mind. Perhaps, however, she should have stayed longer: long enough to appreciate the joy of a picnic in the seventy perfect acres that surround it. After all, beauty is never expected, never comes when you think it will; least of all in the middle of this suburban wilderness, this sprawl of hedgerows and waxed-SUVs. But it’s there, believe me, it’s there.

Making it Work

0

Hands-up if you envisage your married life, five years on, involving regular nights on a friend’s couch. Sound odd? Dysfunctional? In fact, for one Oxford couple it’s standard procedure in an attempt to juggle the cost of graduate degrees at two universities.

Welcome to the life of David Lappano and Leslie James. David is currently reading for an M.St in Theology at Regent’s Park College, and was recently accepted to read for a D.Phil in Theology. Leslie, his wife of five years, is mid-way through a D.Phil in History at the London School of Economics. They live in Oxford (to comply with the University’s residency requirements), in a student flat out by the train station, which is convenient for Leslie to commute to London three days each week. To stretch their student budget, rather than return to Oxford each night Leslie stays with friends, sleeping on couches or in guest rooms. ‘I have about five friends that I will call-up and say, ‘Can I stay with you tonight?’ I just pack my backpack and move around every night.’

It’s no secret that the life of a young academic is difficult. The competition for programmes is intense, surpassed only by the competition for teaching jobs after graduation. (How many programmes do you know with fewer students than faculty?) Long hours of isolated work are inevitable, because a D.Phil thesis must be unique; no one else can do what you are doing. Tired, desperate graduates compete down salaries at hiring institutions, which hold a near monopoly on job placements, and years of specialized research mean that interested and appropriate departments are, quite literally, few and far between.

What’s less appreciated is how all these challenges are multiplied by the desire to maintain a healthy, connected relationship with a partner. All of a sudden, traveling for that conference, to those archives, even staying late at the library carries an additional cost: not just your time, but also your partner’s time is affected. The fact that you invited this complication into your life (funny how it didn’t seem that way at the time) doesn´t make the situation any easier; or, for that matter, that friend’s couch any more comfortable.

Another version of this story is lived by Steve Reynolds, who earned a D.Phil in Philosophy from Oxford in 2009 and currently teaches at New College. For the last four years, Steve’s girlfriend, fiancee and now wife, Becca Reynolds, has lived in Ontario, Canada, finishing law school and now practicing corporate law. ‘Initially we were proud of our ability to concentrate on work and be apart – avoid an early compromise and later resentment. That initial enthusiasm has waned…’
‘The situation affects everything in your life. Sometimes I think that I hate philosophy, what’s the point of all this crap, but that’s really not true. We’re just frustrated by our situation.’

One stress in particular is financial. David and Leslie, for example, completed much of their graduate work in stages, with one partner working while the other studied, but the decision for David to re-enter graduate school at the same time as Leslie meant that significant debt was no longer avoidable. ‘We don’t really comprehend how expensive this is going to be. The numbers don’t really seem real.’

For the time being, however, that’s something they feel they can manage. ‘Money can be stressful, but where it becomes a breaking point is when blame comes into it. Because we’re both contributing to the debt right now, it’s stressful but [we] made the decision together, so there’s no possibility of resentment.’

More generally, the difficulties facing young academics and their partners are a sign of our times: two career families are becoming increasingly common, while the institutions where people make their careers tend to reflect expectations more appropriate to single career families. It’s much easier to work 50, 60 or 70 hours each week if your partner is free to deal with household responsibilities, arrange social engagements and generally be available whenever you happen to not be working.
Finding work in reasonable proximity to each other can also be a challenge, which is why Steve and Becca have decided to move wherever Steve can find work. (So far he has applied in Canada, the US, Britain and Australia.) It’s actually easier for Becca to re-qualify as an attorney in another common law country than for Steve to control where he might get hired. ‘There are just fewer universities for any one specialization than there are law firms in a big city.’

For David and Leslie, the job search is a few years away but the issue still creates anxiety about their ability to start a family. Leslie’s decision to study at the LSE delayed any such plans for three to four years, and when David was deciding whether to pursue further graduate study, the same questions arose. ‘The back and forth was not just about finances; it was about our future, our ability to have a family.’
Ultimately, everyone does their best to make it work in their own way. For Steve, this includes considering alternatives to an academic career, at least in the short term, so that he and Becca can finally live together on a permanent basis. ‘Becca jokes sometimes, “now that we’re married I want to live with you and get to know you!” I don’t think it’s so funny but she has a point.’
‘If pursuing this career means sacrificing other things, then, it’s just no longer worth it, or viable.’

For David and Leslie, the real challenge has been realizing that the most prudent decision is not always the best decision. ‘Sometimes you have to make a decision that’s right but not for practical reasons. This year with both of us in graduate school has been a lesson in the truth of that.’
Not something one is likely to find in a degree prospectus, but all too real for too many couples. Best of luck to everyone.