Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2054

OUCA has no choice but to change

OUCA is no stranger to controversy, but the impact of this week’s revelations should not be underestimated. The consequences of racist jokes told at hustings will not be limited to merely those individuals directly implicated, but will effect both OUCA and Oxford Student Politics in general. The question is where OUCA should go from here.

It is clear that those responsible need to be held to account. Inevitably, the National Conservative Party have already taken appropriate measures by suspending those involved. OUCA President Anthony Boutall has pledged to take similar action pending the results of a disciplinary committee, yet to be held. However, it would be a grave mistake to focus entirely upon the individuals who made the remarks.

Like OUCA, Westminster is currently embroiled in a scandal. MP’s have acknowledged that the public perceive the expenses controversy as symptomatic of wider problems within Parliamentary culture. It would not have been sufficient for a few heads to roll; in order to survive, they have had to pledge to engage in reform of the system. OUCA should pay close attention.

It is clear, for a number of reasons, that the problem goes beyond those who have taken the flak so far. Firstly, there is the point that candidates were asked, in an institutional setting, to tell a racist joke. Cherwell understands that returning officers only halted proceedings mid way through the answers being provided. Why was the question allowed to receive a response in the first place? Damningly, many inside OUCA have suggested that far from being an exception, questions like these are ‘traditional’. People don’t tend make jokes if they don’t think they’ll be laughed at. Clearly, those making them must have thought they would be acceptable in the context of OUCA hustings. Few people will take these remarks in isolation-there is a widespread impression that such behaviour is endemic to the organisation’s culture.

Many within OUCA will be hoping that this all just blows over. Some will be happy to let those directly implicated take the fall, and carry on as usual. This is not the right approach. If there is not wholesale change, they can expect a repeat event. There are several immediate changes that should be made.

Firstly, OUCA should open up. Exclusivity is contrary to the purpose of political parties. OUCA currently prohibits all members bar the President from talking to the press. Given recent events, one can see why such a policy is in place-but it is a mistake nonetheless. OUCA should not operate from behind a veil of secrecy. Rather than attempt to draw a shroud over its members activities, OUCA might benefit from more transparency. Members probably would have been more reluctant to make racist jokes if they knew that it could be reported, on the record, to the press.  

Secondly, OUCA needs to reform both the culture and procedure of its hustings. Hustings do not need to be entirely serious affairs. Indeed, making hustings fun, amusing, and even slightly risqué can contribute to encouraging engagement, a point that is clearly taken to heart by many JCR’s. However, they seem to manage to achieve this without racist material.

Finally, OUCA needs stronger leadership on these issues. The response from Boutall has, frankly, been underwhelming. Throughout the emergence of the story, Boutall claimed to be ignorant of what had happened. In the best possible light, this shows him to be an ineffective leader-was it not his role to find out and deal with exactly such problems as these? 

OUCA has marginalised itself within Oxford politics. There are already moves afoot to exclude it from Freshers Fair, and prominent Conservatives have begun to dissociate themselves-Michael Howard has already withdrawn from OUCA’s post election dinner, which he had been due to speak at. Sanctioning those directly responsible for the current mess is a necessary, but not sufficient measure. If OUCA wants to regain whatever credibility it had, it will have to change.

 

First Night Review: An Inspector Calls

An Inspector Calls is one of the most impressive productions in Oxford this Trinity.  It is a spectacular production brilliantly directed.  It opens with a finely choreographed display of child actors, combined with dominating sound, pouring rain and fog.  Out of this a small house emerges where an engagement party is being held. At this moment we already know how big the gap between student and real acting can be.

Stephen Daldry (who directed The Reader and Billy Elliot) knows how to open this play up to the GCSE audience which dominates (it’s a set text) but also to allow its deeper elements to come out. The dynamic between the interior and exterior of the onstage house is superb.  He also, helped by the fine acting of Inspector Goole, stops the play’s overt moralizing becoming nauseating. Instead of leaving irritated by the inspector’s warning speech that society must tighten its contract we leave unable to criticize, feeling all challenge to the play is a challenge to its message.

The cast are all convincing, from the thoughtless public school boy ‘varsity’ student to the works owner. They act us, and our future selves, well, and it is quite painful at times. Perhaps this is the reason why the audience was basically free of students.

Birling’s daughter is finest, not fully trapped by the prejudices and lack of consideration of her parents’ generation but also not being a careless rebel like her brother.

It’s a play with such a powerful preaching message that one might be concerned it’s going to annoy. It doesn’t, so go.

Five stars out of five

 

First disabled actor on Eastenders to go to Oxford

The first disabled actor on Eastenders is to play an Oxford student in the soap.

The character, Adam West, arrives in Walford to visit his mother, Manda, and falls for Libby Fox, the girlfriend of Darren Miller. He describes himself as “self-obsessed and a bit of a snob.”

Executive producer of the programme, Diederick Santer, praised actor David Proud, who suffrs from spina bifida. saying, “He’s a fine young actor with a wonderfully dry comic delivery, playing an interesting – and possibly rather irritating – character.”

 

Oxford don calls on Queen

An Oxford professor has urged the Queen to use her powers to call an election if Gordon Brown resigns from office.

Vernon Bogdanor, Professor of Government at Oxford said, “There would be considerable public pressure for an early general election if there is another unelected prime minister.”

Bognador added that if Brown continued to ignore clear signs that he had lost the support of the party and the Cabinet, the Queen could be justified in intervening.

“The Queen can ask the Prime Minister if he thinks it is in the best interests of the government and the country if he should continue.”

 

Oxford graduate in Big Brother house

Oxford graduate and entrepreneur Freddie Fisher was one of the 16 contestants to enter the Big Brother house last Thursday.

Fisher’s first task was to change his name by deed poll to ‘Halfwit’ in order to stay in the house. The 23-year-old lives in a stately home, and doesn’t own a TV. He claims not to know how the show works.

Fisher’s time at Oxford was marred by controversy after it was revealed that he ran a website for rent boys, promising punters “fetish and role play”. He lists his interests as “playing with fire, BB guns, trespassing.”

An Oxford friend commented “Freddie had this crazy obsession with guns and weapons.” A former Young Conservative, Fisher was recently pictured meeting Shadow Chancellor George Osbourne.

 

80-year-old infiltrates gardens

An 80-year-old banned for life from Oxford Botanic Garden defied officials by sneaking into the gardens in disguise.

Michael Hugh-Jones, a regular visitor to the gardens for 58 years, was banned two years ago after an angry outburst against staff in front of visiting schoolchildren. The incident was prompted by Hugh-Jones accused them of neglecting a Morning Glory flower.

He this week attempted to sneak into the gardens disguised as a guest at the Lord Mayor’s picnic, desperate to find out what had happened to the plant. His quest ended in tragedy, however, when he discovered that the plant had already been removed by staff.

 

Students remember Tiananmen

Oxford Amnesty International group organised a march and silent vigil last Thursday to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Members marched through the town centre to the Martyr’s Memorial, where they held a minute’s silence, before taking photos. They had two large, bright yellow banners, one stating “Human Rights for China”, and the other “Remember Tiananmen”. Both signs were translated into Chinese, the second translating as “Remember Six-four”, which is how it is referred to in Chinese.

Tim Brook from the Chinese Department in Oxford University made a small speech before the march, in which he spoke about being in China in the spring of 1989 and the unrest which he felt at the time. He stressed that the Tiananmen suppression by the People’s Liberation Army should not be forgotten. He emphasised the injustice surrounding the event and praised Amnesty International for its continued efforts to seek justice for the Chinese people.

Rebecca Darts, who helped to organise the event and who served as president of the Oxford Amnesty International group for the last two terms, described it as a “great success.” She said she was pleased that a huge range of people had attended, including students, members of the public and other local Amnesty groups.

She said it was “essential” for the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre not to go unnoticed and that the event was organised “to show solidarity with the victims and the Tiananmen mothers, and to call for accountability.” She explained how Amnesty is campaigning for an independent and public inquiry into the Tiananmen suppression as a first step towards justice for the victims, and she encouraged students to sign the petition. She went on to stress that the number of innocent civilians killed is still unknown, and an unknown number of protesters still remain in prison.

She acknowledged that only 25 to 30 people participated in the march, around half the number of people that turned up to a similar event held last year. She commented that as it was Trinity term students were likely to be busy with exams, but added that she found it “sad that more students didn’t take to the streets as those students in China did 20 years ago.”

Amensty organises letter-writing lunches every Thursday of term between 2 to 3pm in the Vaults and Garden’s cafe, with lunch for just £1.

 

Students unite against fascism

Protesters on Cornmarket street staged a demonstration against the British National Party on Wednesday. Their actions came as former Union President Luke Tryl denied that his invitation to party leader Nick Griffin had contributed to the party’s success.

The BNP, who advocate repatriation of ethnic minority citizens, won two seats in the European parliament and three new seats in last week’s elections.

One of the activists, Ian McHendry, explained that he wanted to show that there was opposition to the party in Oxford. “We decided to come out on the streets to show that there are people opposed to this, because it can be so disheartening and depressing to see fascists elected.”

He added that his group, Oxford United Against Fascism, had been involved in the mass protests in Michaelmas 2007 against the Oxford Union’s invitation of Nick Griffin to a forum on free speech. At the time, Union president Luke Tryl was accused by many of lending the party legitimacy.
However, he denied that his actions had brought the BNP into the mainstream. “I don’t think that’s the case. It was somewhat two years ago. Besides, it has been proved that ignoring the BNP does not work. There is now a recognition that we need to take on BNP and challenge them on their views.”

He added,”The huge amount of attention they are receiving is unfortunate.”

In a speech on Thursday in which he celebrated his election MEP for North West England, Griffin said, “It is a huge victory. We have been demonised, persecuted and denied the right to hold public meetings.”

The party’s website currently displays a banner with the words “The dam has been broken”.

His party has long faced criticism over alleged racist and fascist sympathies. It first gained national prominence in 1989, when it organised violent demonstrations supporting the rights of white parents to withdraw their children from mixed-race schools.

McHendry said he believed that voters were being misled into supporting the party. “I think BNP voters are being hoodwinked. The party isn’t honest about what it stands for. It uses coded language. They’ve been telling Cowley carworkers that immigrants are to be blamed for losing their jobs, which is obviously completely untrue.”

 

Oxford students hire private tutors

Oxford University students have been hiring private tutors in increasing numbers, with those studying sciences, overseas students and women most likely to seek external assistance.

Dr. Vincent McKee, Director of the Independent Institute of College and University Tutors (ICUT) confirmed that his organisation has been contacted by an increasing number of Oxford students over the past two years. Although there have only been twenty-five who explicitly describe themselves as Oxford students, he believes ICUT tutors many Oxonians who are too embarrassed to divulge the name of their institution.    

Blue Tutors company has also stated that around fifty Oxford university students have asked for assistance within the last three years. Peter Edwards, spokesperson for the organisation said that there have also been “about 50 students…who were in the Oxford area, but didn’t state their university.” He thought that students are reluctant to disclose this information as “this may reflect badly on that university.” 

When asked how the University could improve the teaching system, Edwards suggested that colleges could offer extra tutorials between terms and in the run-up to exams, but pointed out that students are often unwilling to ask for help. He added, “Oxford and Cambridge are understandably proud of their standards, but I think that this occasionally spills over into arrogance, and I don’t believe that an Oxbridge tutorial is necessarily of the high standard that everyone assumes it is.

“I regularly meet and assess the teaching ability of many people who currently teach for the university, and I am fairly shocked at times by what I see.” He also suggested that “students are too slow to question the standard of teaching that they receive in tutorials.”

A spokesperson for the University has defended Oxford’s tutorial system. “Oxford students benefit from much more teaching time and more intensive teaching than almost any other university in the world,” she said pointing out that “The National Student Survey shows that 92 percent of students are satisfied with their courses at Oxford University – higher than the national average.”

Dr McKee has also argued that the number of students seeking outside help suggests that the “tutorial system clearly doesn’t identify all of the problems.”

He particularly expressed dissatisfaction at the problems experienced by foreign students at British Universities. With 70 to 80 percent of ICUT’s clients foreigners, McKee claimed that “overseas students are abandoned by their institutions”.

He added that the students who contact ICUT in the summer months are disproportionately female, an estimated 8 in 10 between July and August. The subjects with the most demand for private tutoring from ICUT include finance, economics, business and management, maths and engineering.  

One student, who wished to remain anonymous, admitted that “given the experience of the previous year, in hindsight, I realise I should have either hired a private tutor or requested to change tutors, as I received very little support from my main tutor and found the tuition to be less than satisfactory for several topics.”

He also thought that tutors may well be more interested in their own research than supporting their students. 

Wadham student attacked in spate of muggings

An Oxford University student was attacked as part of a spate of violent robberies on and around the Iffley Road in the early hours of last Thursday morning. Four people have since been arrested and charged.

Stephen Wadey, a second-year PPE student at Wadham College, was attacked near the Iffley Road Sports Complex as he walked back to his house at around 1am after visiting a friend in college.

Wadey said, “I was walking along one side of the road and there was a group of around ten people on the other side. Two of them broke away and came up to me. They demanded my phone and pushed me over a low wall onto some grass. I fell on my back and then they pinned me down with their hands around my throat and then punched me several times in the face.”

He described his attackers, saying, “One man was mixed-race, between 6′ and 6’1″ and with his face partly covered. The other was white, with short brown hair and was about 5’10”. They were acting really edgy: they were probably on some sort of drugs at the time.”

He said that the men stole his mobile phone and demanded his wallet, but he managed to conceal the possession of money. “I told them I didn’t have any and they seemed to accept that”, he said. The men then ran off to rejoin the group with whom they had been walking and Wadey ran home to telephone the police.

Wadey later learnt that his attack was the fifth to have taken place in the area that night. A 48-year-old man had his wallet and mobile phone taken by two men as he walked home along the Iffley Road at about midnight. Soon after this, two men were confronte and had money, mobile phones and bank cards taken from them. The fourth robbery took place just before that on Wadey, and involved a 22-year-old man who was made to hand over the cash in his wallet.

Thames Valley Police arrested four people at 9.30am the next day in relation to the robberies, following an intensive all-night investigation. Jack Ulett-Titcombe, aged 20, of Herschel Crescent, Littlemore, and Michael Collins, also aged 20, of Iffley Road, Oxford, along with a 17-year-old girl and boy appeared at Oxford Magistrates’ Court on the morning of Saturday 6th June, charged with conspiracy to commit robbery.

Ulett-Titcombe and Collins were remanded in custody, and the two 17-year-olds were released on bail. All four are due to appear again in Oxford Crown Court on Friday.

The attacks were the latest in a series of violent crimes in the Iffley Road area of Oxford, raising questions about whether the University should be doing more to ensure the safety of those members who live out.

According to the Oxford Safer Communities Partnership, incidences of similar crimes have risen dramatically over the last year. There was a 15.6% rise in robberies of individuals in April this year compared with April 2008. This is part of a wider trend, which has seen the rate of violent crime in Oxfordshire increase from 13 incidents per 1000 of the population in 2002/03 to 20 incidents per 1000 of the population in 2007/08.

Wadey described the situation saying, “the crime in that area has gone up massively recently. There was the domestic double stabbing, and two of my friends had their bikes stolen. I think I probably got off lightly compared with some people.”

He said that although he was not displaying any valuables when he was attacked, he nevertheless planned to be more careful in future.

He added that the University had been “responsive to my needs”, and that Wadham had given him accommodation in college for the rest of this year, so that he would not have to continue to live near the scene of his attack. “They have been extremely understanding, and I’m very grateful.”

Finally, when asked what outcome he would like to see from the trial, he said that the main goal should be the prevention of further incidents. “I am simply hoping that whatever the response, no one else has to suffer the same thing as me.”