Three Thames Valley Police officers were reprimanted for using their riot shields to sledge down Boars Hill in Oxford.

The recent heavy snowfalls across the country have brought out a playful side in our local officers, whose snowy prank was uploaded on the internet site YouTube by one of the participants.

However, they were

admonished by Supt. Andrew Murray, who stated that he had “spoken to the officers concerned and reminded them in no uncertain terms that tobogganing on duty, on police equipment and at taxpayers’ expense is a very bad idea should they wish to progress under my command.”

A solidarity group on the social networking site Facebook has been set up by 15-year-old James Keene of Harwell, Didcot, to show support for the police officers.

The group now has well over 200,000 members, and two additional support groups have been created.

Keene explained to Cherwell why he thought the group and incident had attracted so much attention. He stated, “The eye-catching part of the story was the fact it was very funny, but I don’t think it was the only point. It does also show that not all police are the heartless machines they are commonly stereotyped as; they do have a human side to them. All it needed was a bit of snow and a bright idea to bring that out in them!”

When asked about whether he had predicted the rapid growth of support for his campaign, he answered, “I was thinking it would attract 300 or so people by the end of 7 days, but it hasn’t even been 7 days yet and there’s already 200,000 people in it!”

Opinions on the matter appear divided across Oxford’s student body.
Hermione Thompson, a first-year at Magdalen College stated, “It renews my faith in humanity. The bohemian spirit which defined the turn of the last century is still alive today. We need more policemen like that. Whenever I think about that little guy whizzing over the snow, I smile inside. And outside.”

But Jenny Reddish, a first-year Archaeology and Anthropology student, was less amused. She said, “this prank is an example of broken Britain. I think it’s disgusting how these policemen can waste their time frolicking in the snow when there’s crime to deal with on our doorsteps.”

The Thames Valley Police were unavailable for further comment on the support shown by Facebook users.

Senior positions within the University are dominated by privately-schooled pupils, a Cherwell investigation has revealed.

About 60% of JCR Presidents, 70% Society Presidents and 80% elected Union members are from private school backgrounds.

The inequality is most obvious in The Oxford Union. Out of this term’s twenty-two students elected to the secretaries committee and the standing committee, eighteen were privately educated, with only four attending a state secondary school.

The privately educated Union’s President, Stuart Cullen, reacted to the news, saying, “I believe the problem arises from the fact that with several notable exceptions, the opportunities to debate in state schools remain severely limited in comparison to those available to privately-educated children.”

These figures do not help the Union’s elitist reputation though, and has left some to feeling alienated from the private school-heavy committees.

Cullen is looking to tackle the issue this term, with a series of outreach programs aimed at attracting those without the opportunity at school, to participate in debates at the Union.

“This term I’ve invited two hundred state school pupils from forty different schools to attend Union debates, receive debating workshops from our world champions, and access information from OUSU.

“We are also running a debate in third week on the motion “This House believes that Private Schools are bad for the education system” which I hope might raise the profile of the issue.”

There are, however, those who claim that there is pressure in elections to use their private school contacts to win votes. One anonymous source said, “When I ran for the Union, I was encouraged by members of my slate to make use of the number of Oxford undergrads from my old school and to contact them for votes. It was implied that the old school network was an important source of votes.”

Last year 55% of those admitted to the University came from state maintained school with less than 45% coming from independent schools. The fact that, nationally, only 6.5% of schoolchildren are privately educated still causes concern for many.

Once at the University, the survey reveals that the social make-up becomes even more blurred, as the minority of privately educated students go on to take the majority of senior positions.

According to Cherwell’s figures, fourteen out of twenty-four JCR presidents went to private schools, while nineteen out of twenty-eight students who lead political clubs or edit newspapers have a private school background.

The majority of JCR Presidents insisted that students’ schooling played no part in their achieving their positions at Oxford. Others noted the inclusiveness of elections within college and said they felt no secondary education divide, unlike in some societies.

Emma Hall, a state-schooled modern languages student said that, “in applying for a JCR presidential position, I wouldn’t feel disadvantaged having come from a state school.”

She did, however, express doubts over whether this would be the case in society elections. “It seems that coming from a private school means that you are more likely to know people in societies, such as the Union.”

One ex-officer, who asked to remain anonymous, commented that they could see private school pupils having an advantage in elections. “Elections where an image of leadership skills, i.e. impressive public speaking abilities, are required, often favour candidates from private schools”

Society Presidents, Vice-Presidents and other senior positions, such as newspaper editors, remain dominated by those whose parents paid for a secondary school education.

“Perhaps having previously held a position of responsibility at school might make students feel more confident about putting themselves forward for committee positions in Oxford, but I don’t think it’s necessary,” said privately educated Emily Baxter, President of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats.

“Oxford has such a fantastic range of societies to get involved in that there are plenty of leadership opportunities for any student who wants to give it a go,” she said.

Ayo Ajanaku, privately educated ex-Labour Club President, commented that, “the only scenario in which background may play a significant role is in organisations that quite frankly do not even pretend to seek a broad appeal and such groups are in the minority despite the impression that some people give.”

A spokesperson for the University explained that Oxford would not play any role in University elections, no matter how large the inequalities.

A spokesperson said, “Students are democratically elected by their peers to hold titles such as that of JCR President. It is not for the University to determine how students vote for such positions.”

The Oxford Union Standing Committee has voted this term against waiving the room hire fee for the Oxford Hub to hold their weekly Series programme.

The motion, proposed by President Stuart Cullen, which would have seen the continuation of the arrangement begun in Trinity Term 2009, was rejected by the Standing Committee with 8 opposing and 2 abstaining.

Over the previous two terms, the Series has provided the Union with several high profile speakers secured through Oxford Hub contacts, such as Rwandan genocide survivor Jean Baptiste Kayigamba and Eliot Whittington, the climate specialist for Christian Aid.

However, the Union stated that this term’s crowded term card, including former UN Ambassador Sir Jeremy Greenstock and Conservative MP Damian Green, has made it impossible for them to accommodate the Series event on the Wednesday evening slot.

Cullen explained, “We felt that the series did not contain speakers which merited cancelling or moving these speakers and events to later dates.”

The Oxford Hub President lobbied the Union to allow the arrangement to continue in a letter outlining the benefits provided to the society.

The letter stated that the Series’ diverse range of speakers and coverage of ethical and environmental issues, helped to encourage a wider variety of students than usual to attend the Union, providing an ideal opportunity to recruit new members. However, Standing Committee doubted that this was a tangible benefit.

Some felt that by offering free use of the rooms to Oxford Hub, the Union is allowing it an unfair privilege over other student societies.

It has also been revealed that there may be other issues which contributed to the Standing Committee’s decision; the arrangement stipulated a mutually beneficial advertising campaign from both organisations, however some have felt that the arrangement has not performed as well as expected.

What the Union’s withdrawal from the arrangement means for the future of the two societies’ partnership is not clear. Union President Stuart Cullen stated that “This is in no means a reflection on the work of the Oxford Hub, which the Union looks forward to working with in terms which are slightly less hectic!”

Meanwhile the Oxford Hub Series has relocated to the Saskatchewan Room at Exeter College, with the first debate on climate change including Simon Berry, founder of Cola Life and a representative of supermarket giant Tesco.

One member of the Union commented, “Although it is a pity for OxHub to not have use of the Union rooms, Exeter is still a central, convenient location for a lot of students.” 

A man accessed both St Anne’s College and Lady Margaret Hall on Saturday afternoon, in attempts to steal from both colleges, according to police reports.

He stole cash and cards from rooms at LMH, but was accosted by suspicious students at St Anne’s before he was able to take anything.

A combination of information from the St Anne’s students who apprehended the intruder and CCTV footage lead to the man’s arrest not long after the event.

College authorities have now warned that criminal gangs may be specifically targeting University students.

The individual in question arrived at St Anne’s early on Saturday afternoon, coming in through the front entrance. According to a student involved, who wished to remain anonymous, “the intruder attempted to enter student’s rooms, including mine, and when I confronted him, he was unable to provide a plausible explanation for being in college. We were able to inform the porters and police of the intruder before he was able to steal anything.”

However, the man managed to make it to LMH later on in the afternoon, coming into the college by the main entrance just after 3 pm.

It is thought that he had found a key fob a student had lost some time before, and a student who saw him holding it let him into the main building. He then was able to take cash and cards from unlocked rooms. Most of the LMH site is connected internally, so the intruder was able to walk through a large proportion of college trying doors.

Emily Cuthbert, a first-year maths student at LMH, says she was heading back to her open room, when she saw three middle-aged people loitering by her door. She became suspicious and informed the porters of what she had seen. She added that “they didn’t steal anything from my room but because they were loitering outside my open door I feel they were probably considering it.”

The man was later identified by trawling through hours of CCTV footage at LMH. The video shows a relatively young male, dressed smartly in a black overcoat and grey scarf, entering the college at 15:07 on Saturday afternoon – a time when many people are coming or going from the site.

Thames Valley Police informed Cherwell that the suspect has been remanded to custody, and will face trial at Oxford Crown Court on Monday. They also praised the actions of the St Anne’s students who “apprehended the criminal, contacted the porter and obtained vital identifying information”, saying that “this spontaneous action by two alert students proved invaluable in bringing the burglar to justice.”

Genevieve Clark, LMH JCR President, explained that the event there occurred because of a “simple mistake of someone trying to be helpful and fobbing someone in.” She also said that the “porters do all they can for security” and that “students should be reminded to always lock their doors and report any kind of theft immediately to the porters and the police so the criminals can be caught”.

Owen Evans, St Anne’s JCR President, similarly urged students to be cautious when it comes to security.

Additionally, LMH’s Female Welfare Officer, Karen Clarke, circulated an email to the JCR urging students not to “give anyone access into colleges or the buildings.” She added that “the police are aware of a number of groups in the city who specifically target the university’s colleges.”

Oxford University students have camped out for over thirty-eight hours, braving the snow and rain, in order to secure housing in the Jericho area.

The annual release of the student property list by North Oxford Property Services (NOPS), who operate on a ‘first come first served’ basis, is notorious for provoking over-night queues. This week, a group from St Anne’s College began queuing very early, taking to the streets at 6:30 on Tuesday evening in anticipation of the release of property on Thursday morning.

Many students commented that they had been warned against queuing up, and even against using NOPS altogether. A first year stated their College’s JCR advised caution, because students can “feel obliged to sign a deal because they’re worried they’re going to miss their chance.”

The system implemented by NOPS, which results in students camping outside in wintry conditions, has angered many. Jenni Butler, a first year student at Somerville College stated “it’s such a bad system, I can’t believe people started queuing so early, NOPS should discourage it, if they see people here they should send them home – at the moment you worry that if you don’t queue you’re not going to get anything decent.”

She continued, “I’m missing a class because we have to sign a contract at nine – I had to write an essay today on three hours sleep.” Though most groups are taking turns to wait outside in shifts, others were less fortunate; a fresher from Christ Church, whose prospective house mate was unable to make the queue due to ill health, commented that he had been outside for eight hours and had no alternative but to continue waiting for a further twelve.

Some undergraduates praised NOPS who had provided queue members with hot drinks and dry cleaned students’ sleeping bags after they had spent a night camping out in the snow. Others pointed out that such gestures were “nice but then considering the non-refundable admin fee of £135 per head, insignificant.”

The letting agency refused to comment on the legitimacy of the admin fee which students describe as “outrageous”, but defended the current process arguing that due to demand, the first come first served policy remains to be “the fairest system that we can implement.”

NOPS is not the only company to employ this strategy yet alternative estate agents have conceded that the system was by no means ideal. One estate agent stated that they were even aware of instances in which customers had been offered large sums of money in exchange for the opportunity to jump the queue and get first picks on houses.

Unlike other Oxford estate agents, North Oxford Property Services does not warn against overnight queuing.

A first year undergraduate from Somerville College referred to the company’s online clock which counts down the hours, minutes and seconds until the 9:00 release, describing it as “patronising and unnecessary”. According to NOPS “Students have missed the boat in the past, complaining that they were not aware of the release day. The clock means all students are aware.”

The company offered no comment as to why it uploads videos of past student queues on to the internet, however. A second year student who camped outside their office last year was critical of their actions, “They put videos of people queuing on the internet which creates unnecessary hype. It makes people think that unless they camp outside for two nights they won’t be able to live in the area.”

Welfare Reps are keen to point out that North Oxford Property Services are not the only letting agency in Jericho and that students should not sign a deal without looking around a house. But most students were unable to look at properties because NOPS have made the open day for viewing houses the same date as the release of the student list.

Only students who happen to know people currently living in the area have had an opportunity to view properties. This, combined with the competitive nature of the release, has led to fears that students may feel pressured into signing a deal before they have time to properly consider.

Laura Clegg, a second year student from St Hilda’s College recollected her experience on the day of the release, “You end up making a decision on where to live based on two sentences and thumbnail photo of a front door.” She described the state of her property on moving in, adding “our garden was too overgrown to use, there were slugs in our kitchen because it was so damp, our washing machine was broken when we arrived and never fixed, we had a broken window that was patched up with MDF for weeks, another window had a crack in it that was never repaired and our front door didn’t shut properly.”

Laura Adamson, a former tenant, also criticised NOPS. She said, “According to contract, it was meant to be the landlord who dealt with areas like the maintenance of the house but that did not happen in our case, despite many requests.”

Former Oxford pharmacologist, Professor Les Iversen, has been appointed Chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs to the government.

The post has been empty since David Nutts, the previous Senior Drugs Advisor, was controversially sacked by Home Secretary Alan Johnson over his criticism of tougher cannabis laws.

Further controversy has arisen over the content of a 2003 lecture Iversen gave called for the legalisation of cannabis.

However, his position on the effects of cannabis appears to have changed over the last few years.

In an interview last week with BBC Radio 5, Iversen stated “we now have to confront the more potent forms of cannabis, we have new evidence that arose since 2003, linking cannabis to psychiatric illness.”

He commented, “I think it is quite free for a scientist to change his mind when faced with new facts.”