Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2075

Interview: Fightstar

A full hour before doors are due to open, a horde of fans are sat in wait, leaning against the grubby wall of the O2 Academy as they try to catch a glimpse of the band through the windows.

As someone who knows Fightstar as ‘that fit guy who used to be in Busted’s new band,’ I am bemused at this show of loyalty, but it’s no rare occurrence. ‘There are some people outside that have been to every show we’ve ever done’, bassist Dan tells us, himself looking rather incredulous, ‘I just don’t know how they do it.’

Fightstar have come a long way since their formation in 2003, but they still work hard to keep their fan base happy, or even to produce music at all. Their latest release, Be Human, required the bold step of creating their own label Search & Destroy. Even so, they aren’t naive about the increasing business difficulties of the music industry: ‘We’ve created a model which seems to be the way of the future for us smaller bands to be able to generate enough income to survive,’ they explain of their decision to self-fund the record.

I wonder if the band would consider a career change in accountancy as they explain their various money-making ventures, including most creatively their own iPhone application in which fans play ‘catch the milk’ as their album cover (which depicts a woman with the head of a cow next to a glass of milk) is brought to life. With the highest scorer eventually winning a guitar, you have to praise the boys’ originality in persuading fans to part with their cash.

There are also, however, creative advantages to self-releasing. Fightstar gained a lot of freedom by additionally deciding to coproduce Be Human themselves, alongside long-term friend Carl Bown, who plays guitar in support band Laruso. As Bown was able to offer them cheap rates, the group could afford to rack up seventy days in the studio, despite their low budget. ‘It was a shed. So we had creative freedom, but physical freedom…? Living so close to each other for all that time was crazy at times,’ jokes Dan.

But guitarist and vocalist Alex explains that this time spent working closely together was necessary: ‘because everything was done off our own back, there was no one there cracking the whip and it was up to us to self-motivate.’
The time spent perfecting tracks in the studio is audible on their new album, which sees the band diversifying more in their arrangements whilst maintaining their trademark dark atmosphere. ‘I think it’s just better, basically,’ says Dan, clearly proud of their latest achievement. ‘The ideas are more complex, but not just for the sake of complexity.’

This is particularly evident in the use of orchestral and choral layers on Be Human. Enlisting a sixteen piece string orchestra on such a low budget was no easy task, and the band confess to pulling a lot of favours to secure frequent Coldplay arranger Audrey Riley.

Their aim was to create a textured sound which has a cinematic feel, reflecting the four band members’ shared love of film, and they succeed in attaining this effect. It’s easy to imagine songs such as ‘The English Way’ providing the soundtrack to an angsty moment in an indie flick.

Achieving the same outcome live is less successful, despite their use of choral samples throughout the show. Instead they go back to their more conventional rock roots, striking poses and pulling faces as they hammer through an energy-fuelled set which has the crowd forming a mosh pit that fills almost the whole of the smaller Academy room.

While still incorporating the doom and gloom elements now expected from Fightstar, the lyrics on the new tracks performed also reveal a more uplifting tone, particularly in latest hit ‘Mercury Summer’. ‘We’ve all been in a happier situation than we have in the past’, Alex explains the inspiration for his brighter lyrics, ‘there are a few love songs poking about.’

Going by tonight’s show, Fightstar will only go on to get happier. The energy levels are high both on and off stage, and fans are clearly delighted at the band’s choice of an acoustic version of old favourite ‘Amethyst’ as an encore. After a brilliant first night performance, it’s highly probable they’ve added to their loyal fan base. Certainly my appreciation of them as a live band has grown, and not only because Charlie looks cute when his hair gets sweaty.

Students could earn interest on loans

Deflation means that students may be given rebates on student loans unless interest rate calculations are changed.

Interest on student loans is calculated with reference to the Retail Prices Index (RPI), which in March showed inflation to have dropped to -0.4%. It is the first time Britain has experienced deflation since 1960.

Interest is calculated in March but applied in September, meaning that current economic changes would not impact on loans until later this year.
The fall in inflation effectively means that students would start to earn interest on their loans, rather than pay it, and could result in rebates for some graduates.

However, this will only be the case if the way that interest is calculated is not changed.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, which is in charge of policy making for the Student Loans Company, said that they are in discussions with the Treasury and will ‘consider the options available’.

She added that the department hopes to ‘make an announcement shortly’.
The DIUS has indicated that the situation will have been clarified well in advance of the annual change to interest rates in September.

Interest on ‘mortgage-style’ fixed rate loans taken out before 1998 must track RPI rates, even if they go into deflation. Post-1998 rates, in contrast, are based on the annual March RPI or the highest bank base rate, whichever is the smaller, plus 1%.

The Student Loans Company has also recently announced a new loan recovery system for outstanding loans.

In a news release on its website, the company said that it will be contacting graduates who have consistently defaulted on loan payments. It threatened that those whose salary exceeds the maximum for deferment will be registered with UK Credit Reference Agencies. The changes only apply to those on post-1998 loans which are tied to RPI.

The company emphasised that options are available for those who need to defer or work out a new repayment plan.

Before the fall into deflation last month, students had been paying the highest rate of interest on loans since the early nineties, at 4.8% throughout 2007/08. The SLC has said that interest in 2009/10 will not exceed this year’s rate of 3.8%.

5 Minute Tute: May Day

Why do we celebrate May Day at all?

The origins of May Day are pre-Christian, when its position approximately halfway between the spring equinox and the summer solstice led to it being revered as the first day of summer on the pagan calendar. The Celts called the festival ‘Beltane’, Bel being their god of the Sun. On this day, the Roman flower goddess, Flora, was also celebrated. The tradition of a May Day celebration survived the decline of paganism thanks to efforts by the Church to obscure the pagan festival with Roodmas, a rival Christian mass. The festivities associated with May Day were smothered by Puritanism under Oliver Cromwell but revived with the Restoration of Charles II in 1660. May 1st is also celebrated around the world as International Workers’ Day, or Labour Day.

 

What exactly happens in Oxford?

At 6am on May Morning crowds throng The High around Magdalen College to hear the choir sing the Hymnus Eucharisticus from the top of Magdalen Tower. After this, the college bells signal the start of festivities, including Morris Dancing and live music, throughout the city.
Many cafés and restaurants open early to serve the revellers a May Morning breakfast and other college choirs perform their own hymns. It is spuriously reported that there is a tradition of jumping into the Cherwell from Magdalen Bridge; the practice emerged in the 1970s and has had a history of injuries ever since. The police now prevent access to the bridge on May morning – making the jump an even bigger challenge for some.

 

How is May Day changing?

May Day certainly isn’t going anywhere in a hurry, but it may be changing. It has been reported that Oxford Council’s budget cuts will hit the celebration this year and in the future. The costs of decoration, live music, performers and police are all considered too high and will lead to scaling-down of festivities in 2009. Further pressure has been applied in recent years by the cost of closing Magdalen Bridge to prevent ‘jumpers’; the council denies that this is a significant factor. On the bright side, some changes may be for the good. In particular the diversity of the acts to be seen around Oxford is growing every year, including modern dance and martial arts displays.

 

What goes on elsewhere to celebrate?

May Day celebrations around the country offer a glimpse into the eccentricity of rural Britain. Many towns and villages still erect maypoles on their greens for people to dance around; this emerged as a fertility ritual and an opportunity for matchmaking among the young. Barwick in Yorkshire, claims the largest maypole in England, standing some 30 meters in height. There is also typically the crowning of the May Queen who is paired up with the village effigy of the Green Man, both traditions hailing back to Roman and Celtic folklore. In Padstow, townsfolk celebrate with the ‘Obby ‘Oss (Hobby Horse, though it does not resemble a horse). Two horses, the Old Oss and the Blue Ribbon Oss, set out from rival pubs and parade until they meet raucously in the centre of town. Kendal in Cumbria holds a medieval street market with costumes and music. There is also the famous cheese-rolling in Gloucester and the Tetbury Wool Sack Race. In London, the Beltane Bash is recognised as the world’s oldest Pagan Pride Parade, attracting thousands of modern day practitioners of ancient spiritualism.

 

Are there any memorable May Days in history?

On May Day 1517, xenophobic riots in London led to troops entering the capital, mass arrests and a 9pm curfew the night before. 14 rioters were hung, drawn and quartered, 400 more were pardoned by Henry VIII.
On May Day 1707, the Act of Union came into effect, uniting Scotland and England.
In the United States, May Day 1886 saw strike action by hundreds of thousands of Americans in support of an eight-hour day.
On May Day 1997, Tony Blair became PM after Labour won the general election
On May Day 2005, a record 40 people were injured in Oxford after jumping off Magdalen Bridge into the Cherwell – the police have since closed the bridge every year.

The State Debate

Antonia Tam

English, St Hilda’s

People who are privately educated only make up about 7% of those in British schools and yet a disproportionate number gain places at the top universities. In 2007, a third of Oxbridge admissions were from just 3% of elite independent schools.
We often hear about access initiatives for those in state education, but the very fact that there is such a divide in the first place is disheartening. If private schools were to be abolished everyone would have a similar starting ground. Not only would state education improve, with pressure on the government to ensure high standards, but society would be better integrated. I wouldn’t suggest that we abolish private education immediately-there is a huge but necessary input from the government into the public sector that would take time. However, in the long run, society would be better off if a child’s education wasn’t determined by its family finances.
From an early age privately educated pupils mix almost exclusively among those 7% of similarly educated people, mostly from the middle classes. This results in a small network of people with favourable connections in the jobs market, who are ignorant of other social groups. How can equal opportunity and an integrated society become a reality with such divisions? Education should be as much about acquiring social awareness and mutual understanding as it should be about academic or vocational work. There should not be an option to pay more for an education that makes it easier for one to secure a place at the more sought after universities. State education is, in many cases, exemplary. I was lucky enough to attend a fantastic state sixth form college which thoroughly looked after all of its pupils. Such schools are an example of what is possible, but the state education system is constantly undermined in its efforts to improve, because private education is supported by vast financial resources. Were there only state schools, the wealthy would invest their energy into ensuring that the standards of state schools were consistently driven up. I object to the unnecessary and misinformed snobbery that sometimes seems to come with having attended a private school. One’s ability to fork out thousands for something everybody should have ready access to does not strike me as something worth being especially proud of. When discrimination hits a child the moment school begins, you know there’s a problem.

 

David Merlin-Jones

History, Exeter

For many, private education is the root of much evil in society, the cause of gross injustice. It is argued that much of the inequality in society can be traced back to it, one way or another. Everyone seems to be in favour of equality, in principle. But what exactly do we want to achieve when we talk about it? Equality of ‘opportunity’ means everyone gets to start from the same scratch line. After that, how things turn out is left up to the individual. Private schools give the rich a head start, their parents already having run half the race. Yet to aim at equality of ‘opportunity’ is totally unrealistic.
Try to overcome the accident of birth and it simply won’t work; some are born rich, some are born poor—the failure of Communism has more than proven that. What really matters for people is equality of ‘outcome’; that at the end of the day, they have as much as anyone else. Private education need not be objectionable to those who believe in equality. This is because equality of outcome aims for equality at the other end of schooling, through the balancing out of eventual material differences in society.
While the type of education you receive in school may have a large impact on your later choice of and access to well-paid careers, the solution to this is government intervention after education ends, not while it is happening. Those who benefit from private education should have to compensate society at large for their hand up in life once they enter the working world. This means taxing the rich to give to the poor—old fashioned redistribution of wealth.
 Private education then benefits everyone, not only those individuals who enjoy its advantages directly, but also society as a whole through greater tax revenue, better public finances and, eventually, better welfare for all. It cannot be a bad thing for the country as a whole to have some who are educated to a superior level, many of whom will take up jobs in public service that benefit all. This is the best way to settle the issue of private education.

 

Phoebe Thompson

Philosophy and Theology, Keble

Private schools benefit from having able staff, superior facilities and motivated pupils who learn in small-sized classes.  They also encourage their pupils to believe that they can achieve places in top universities and that they deserve them.  Little wonder then that Sir Peter Lampl’s recent report for the Sutton Trust discovered that pupils from just 200 (mainly independent) schools make up half of Oxbridge entrants; the remaining 3,500 make up the rest.  It also discovered almost half of those holding the top jobs in law, politics and the media had attended a handful of the most selective, research-led universities. So if the key to life opportunities is attendance at a good university, why don’t state schools just improve?
 The reality is that many lack the motivated students, the teaching expertise, and the parental involvement that are bound up in the private school system.  Because of this divide, parents will continue to pay for the opportunities that private schools offer. However, were private schools abolished, parents would no longer have the choice of the ‘better’ school, and would be forced to put their children into state education.
Over time the state schools would become those ‘better’ schools’ with the introduction of students who would raise the bar among their peers.  Access to the top universities would no longer be skewed towards applicants from the ‘best’ schools but would truly be available to the best and most able candidates.
Since access to the top universities is directly linked to opportunities in the top legal, educational, political and business jobs, this country would at last get the leaders it deserves. For this reason and because, if we truly believe in fairness, we should agree that everyone deserves the same life chances, the private school system should be abolished.  This would give schools the opportunity to combine the best of the current state and private systems and to offer a stronger and fairer state education to all.    

 

Marc Kidson

PPE, St John’s

Any government knows that to abolish private schools would be political suicide. I can see the Daily Mail headline now: ‘The Abolition of Achievement’. Yet this is not because the average Daily Mail readers can afford to privately educate their children, most cannot, but the editors of newspapers, the CEOs of companies, top civil servants and government ministers themselves can, and do.
Admittedly, there would also be a grassroots backlash against closing the 2,500 private schools—the middle-class parents who have opted-out of the state system are not likely to take favourably to being forced into it – but there is grassroots opposition of some size to ID cards, the Iraq war and Trident, all of which went (or are going) ahead.
Rather, what would stay the hand of even the most progressive government is that such a move would kick to the heart of what the sociologist C. Wright Mills branded the ‘power elite’ (he was talking about 1950s USA but the phenomenon translates all too well to modern Britain). It is irrelevant that most of the 600,000 students at private school do not have parents of such lofty influence. It matters far more that the limited network of those who are in positions of power almost all send their children to such schools.
I admit that I went to comprehensive school and an FE college, but I do not have a vicious antipathy to the private sector. In fact, I think that there are plenty of things that are laudable about it and should be emulated in the state sector.
My biggest grumble is that between private schools, grammar schools and the social stratification of state schools by postcode under the New Labour “choice” agenda, all too many state schools are anything but comprehensive. Instead, they have ‘difficult’ intakes concentrated in areas of social deprivation and, as a result, lack the culture of demanding, hectoring middle-class parents able to drive improvements from below. Abolishing the private sector would just bloat the grammar schools and prosperous suburban high schools further; it would not cure the malaise at the heart of the system.
Perhaps we should try making the comically named ‘comprehensives’ actually comprehensive, with proper representation of all sections of the community. Wouldn’t it be fun to see how quickly the state sector improves if the sons and daughters of this country’s media barons and commercial leaders actually had to go to them?

Oxford researchers test TB vaccine

The first new TB vaccine for 80 years, designed by researchers at Oxford University, is being given to nearly 3000 infants in South Africa to test its effectiveness.

Researchers say the current vaccine, the familiar and widely used BCG, is not effective enough, with 1.5 million people worldwide still dying from TB each year.

The new experimental vaccine is called MVA85A. It can be used on its own, or as a booster in conjunction with the BCG.

Dr Helen McShane, who led the vaccine research, said: “This trial will hopefully show that the vaccine can protect people from getting TB.”

Cancer Bats Play Live in Oxford

Oxford’s Academy 2 is a gloomy place at the best of times, but on this dark, damp Monday evening the atmosphere was positively soul-destroying. The little black room, populated by sparse, staring crowd, reeked of unwashed bodies and stale beer. SSS and The Plight, our two brave UK hardcore support acts, garnered no more than appreciative nods by all except one over-enthusiastic punk, despite their obvious ability. The crowd – if you could really call it that – looked ever more empty and despondent as they waited for the main act.

 

But then Cancer Bats burst, shadowy and snarling, onto the stage, and the room exploded. A thrashing, yelling, kicking and screaming group of fans detonated the area in front of the stage, transforming the atmosphere into something potent, dangerous, and – most importantly – fun.

 

Frontman Liam Cornier leaped around the stage like a heady combination of Iggy Pop and Puck, his drawling, infectious screech whipping the crowd into a relentless frenzy, whilst guitarist Scott Middleton stoked their fire with his chugging, monstrous riffs. The set seemed to gather more energy as it powered forth, like a runaway train, with the apocalyptically heavy ‘Sorceress’ leading wonderfully into their groovy, crawling breakthrough hit ‘Lucifer’s Rocking Chair’.

 

As the last chords echoed around the room, Cornier propelled himself into the deeply appreciative crowd to embrace and clench fists together. A short, sharp encore provided one last blast before they trudged, tired and happy, down the stairs back into reality. Cancer Bats must be one of the most exciting live punk acts playing today. Their next album should take them into the punk stratosphere.

Does Doxbridge Count?

Anyone who doesn’t know what this curious word stands for, I am sorry that your life has not been thus enlightened. DOXBRIDGE is the fond term for the epic sports tournament that occurs over in Dublin at the beginning of every Spring holidays between the three universities of Oxford, Cambridge and Durham. And when I say epic, I really do mean it: three days of competitive sport, competitive socialising, and competitive madness sandwiched in-between a day of travelling at either end. What more could one ask for?

6.25am A phone alarm rings all too early in a high-ceilinged yellow dorm somewhere in the depths of Dublin city. It is quickly silenced. There is a strong possibility hovering in the air that no-one will be sitting on our 7am bus. The floor is occupied by 9 suitcases, overly large for a 5-day trip of course but that’s essential for the female’s peace of mind (and especially if there are fancy dress themes involved). Their innards are scattered around the perimeter of the room leaving a central space for the empty bottles and chipped china mugs from the youth hostel kitchen that explain, all too plainly, why the finest of Wadham netball team are currently dead to the world.

6.30am A second, more insistent alarm goes and people begin to stagger to their feet with varying degrees of enthusiasm. With only one bathroom in the shared dorm, progress is slow and as a result there is no possibility of having time to scrub off the pirate tattoos still branded on us from the ‘nautical’ theme of the night before.

7.45am We arrive at the sports centre after a quiet bus journey – more a voyage of silent reflection than of animated conversation. The university sports centre, sensibly enough at this hour, is almost entirely empty. The teams make a bee-line for the netball courts where people begin to look around, size each other up. In the netball competition there are four Oxford teams, one Cambridge team and about 10 Durham teams. As a whole this seems quite an accurate reflection on the tournament as a whole, with Durham putting out by far the most teams, followed by Oxford, and Cambridge having the least number of representatives. Boring tabs.

8.30am The tournament kicks off and the cheering begins with Wadham A vs. Wadham B – a nice friendly game to get us going before we take on the real opposition. The matches are 10 minutes each way with a short break for half-time. That may not sound like very much but believe me, with the large quantity of alcohol still running around in 99.9% of the players present it was more than enough to create some very red faces. Thankfully the umpires take it all in very good spirits even if their highly trained expertise is perhaps at times wasted on some rather drowsy students.

9.30am Wadham A vs. St. Cuthbert’s. This first non-Oxford match is against the side that a number of people consider to be the top competitors from Durham so there is pressure to perform as we step on-court. The fact that the majority of the team are what normal people would class as giants doesn’t improve our confidence. The goal-shooter is definitely close to being able to perform the slam-dunk manoeuvre on a netball court. The running rate is high, as is the number of goals scored on either side, and at halftime Wadham finds themselves just a few precious goals ahead. The teams return rosy-cheeked to resume play and despite battling hard, Cuth’s manage to claw back to a draw at full-time. Personally I reckon that height rather than skill was the clinching factor.

10.45am  Wadham A vs. St. Hild and St. Bede. Reputed as another strong Durham side, but on this occasion our Oxford side manages to take them down fairly easily. As a result victory marks the end of the day’s play for us as we stand on an equal footing with St. Cuth’s. The teams pack up as the other divisions begin to arrive looking rather more well-rested. (Still a few cross-bones and anchors around though…).

12.00am Back to the hostel and ready to celebrate a top day of sporting achievement with food, showers, and…….. bed. Yes, we did spend the prime hours of the day sleeping. It really did feel good though.

16.30pm A group excursion to the local supermarket – ‘Supervalue’. It must be said that considering the dire state of the euro right now, we definitely purchased some suspicious ‘Country Cola’ that can rightly be deemed as falling into this category. It’s super cheap and super rough.

19.00pm Numerous gourmet meals are produced in the steamy overpopulated hostel kitchen, mainly consisting of the exotic staples of pasta or rice. The fight over pans and cutlery reaches an extreme height and university rivalry begins to emerge among the industrial-sized cooker units.

19.45pm Now happily fed, the transformation process begins as the entire team gradually take on the alternative identity of cavewomen. For a B.C. theme the muddy-faced, back-combed hair, leopard-print look really is hard to beat.

21.00pm And so the drinking commences…. seated in a large circle on the floor of our cosy dorm room, the games take place in the height of luxury with carefully removed plastic beakers. All drinking is done responsibly though of course, zero peer pressure involved.

23.00pm  Club time. The various teams make their own separate ways to the chosen destination. Thus we are to be viewed running through the Dublin streets in our cavewoman attire which proves to be wholly insufficient against the cold evening as we try to find an unknown street through a combination of orienteering and asking locals.

23.30pm Club located. Leopard-print fest. Enough said.

And so concluded the first official day of our Doxbridge adventure. Losing to the overall winners of the tournament in the semi-finals gives testament to it being a pretty good recipe for success. After a day of sleeping, eating, valiant attempts at running, drinking and more drinking, it was Doxbridge 1 – student health 0. Long live Doxbridge.

Running into the Sand

Don’t be fooled by the serenity of the landscape. The ever-expansive sandy scene, undulating and oozing like honey to the horizon and beyond. Sandy, yes; billions of granules of sand. Making their own race across the desert as they chased me, bit at my torso, whipped my face, gritted my eyes, sank duplicitously under my steps. This was their game. This was my challenge. This was the Marathon des Sables: the Marathon of the Sands. The toughest footrace on the planet. There was no Romanticism here.

This is perhaps a realization that crossed the minds of Oxford students Adam Park and Tom Lickiss as they raced across the Sahara this Easter in what was a grueling test of mental and physical endurance. The MdS is an ultramarathon, where competitors are expected to carry all of their supplies for the 7-day race on their backs (including sleeping bags, food, cooking supplies, and, most obscurely, 10 safety pins). For those of you impugning the true brutality of the race, I can assure you it is labeled an ultramarathon with complete veracity; in total it is 151 miles in length, usually broken up into 6 sections, and is designed to be run. Running 6 marathons in 6 days is pretty serious; particularly considering the middle of the race is met by a double-marathon stage. It’s pretty serious, considering it takes place in a desert where early morning temperatures soar above 40 degrees Celsius; where sandstorms constantly rap the landscape; where food and comfort is as limited as running water in the developing world. And still, despite all this, the competition enjoys the participation of around 700 individuals from across the world each year. What is it that drives them to do it? Masochistic tendencies? Utter lunacy? Or a desire to discover their true character in the most rigorous and testing way possible? This is what I seek to find out.

To begin with, Adam and Tom were never first-hand couch potatoes, the kind to justify such a lifestyle with the typical “I’m a student!” exclamation as if it was a prescribed manner of conduct. Between them, these two Univ students have cycled 12,000 miles across multifarious terrain on 3 different continents, completed an Ironman triathlon, two 100km Trailwalker races, an 80km footrace, and now, the Marathon des Sables, raising over £20,000 for various charities. They are challenge-seekers through and through, and seemingly, remarkable young men. Extremely multitalented; almost freakishly so, with the intelligence and social skills that would turn most green with envy. But despite natural physical ability for sport and endurance (Adam is a Black Belt in TaeKwon-Do and was a trialist for the Home Countries International England Rowing Squad), months of intensive training, and immeasurable dedication to their latest challenge, nothing could have prepared them for their latest tour de force.
How does one even approach such an event, and why? Adam disclosed to me, “I had no idea what kind of trouble I was going to run into, how much pain I was going to have to take, only that I was going to and that I would find out the kind of person I really am when I did”. And perhaps that was it. To push yourself to the physical limit, to see if your character can really be as tough as you want it to be. To climb your own psychological mountain. I imagine that a feeling of incredible vulnerability must overcome you, looking out across those obscure and extending monotonous dunes, until an almost animalistic necessity to survive takes charge and you’re forced to react. Your coping mechanisms, your mental strength, and fundamentally, whether as a person you are built to cope with the incomprehensible pain, exhaustion, stress and delusion, will emerge, at least attempting to overshadow the sensations of loneliness and confusion. Nature cannot be the only dictator in this microcosm however. Here, society must occasionally step in, regulating your physical capacity according to the stringent (and sensible) MdS rules: one drip is permitted, but two grants you disqualification, my friend, and, perhaps more shamefully, your name ruefully stamped across the “QUITTERS” list. The ultimate mark of failure through the eyes of a competitor.

The race was a challenge from the offset, but became a struggle on day three, which brought with it the ever-looming double marathon stage, a dark, rumbling cloud that had been hanging heavily over the entire course. This year, the stage was 10km longer than previous years and the longest stage in the history of the MdS. 91km of sand, rocks, wind, blistering sun in the day and bitter cold at night. The desert became a dark place, stripped down to the fundamentals, a vast, consuming vacuum, void of anything but heavy drudgery. Adam and Tom hit their “lowest and darkest moment of the whole race” during this stage. Following completion, Adam wrote of the “hard-hitting pain”, how each step felt like walking on “hot wax…and like someone’s poured rusty nails into my left knee.” Reflecting on how he was feeling twice as bad as after finishing the Ironman, he remarked poignantly, “I still have a marathon to run tomorrow”.

The demons in their heads, magnified through the starvation, physical distress (by this point they were both harbouring “pancake-sized blisters”), sleep deprivation and incredible fatigue, had taken a hold. Feeling the pressure to push on through the night in order to maximize their chances of making a quick long day stage, they marched on into the night as if possessed, shrouded by delusion, but quickly realized the absolute necessity to return to camp. Tom, overcome with fatigue and dehydration, entered the medical tent and two hours down the line was struck with the 3 magic symptoms that conveyed a drip: diarrhoea, vomiting and dehydration. As far as he was concerned, a drip was “a step on the road to submission”. His attempt at refusal was thwarted, however, and he spent the rest of the night attempting to balance the fluid bag on his shoulder as he crouched over a hole in the ground relieving himself. Not as bad as the poor guy who thought he had “soiled himself in his sleeping bag eight times” during the night, but pretty degrading to say the least.

By this point the race had become a battle of survival for many, but the knowledge of completion and having the end in sight provided most with great strength. Adam and Tom were forced to complete the race independently, but both managed to sprint-finish, fuelled by adrenalin and, in the final moments, elation. Adam came in 327th out of 774 competitors that day, while the end was met with mixed feelings by Tom, obviously very disappointed at being robbed of the physical capability to run the race like he had trained to. But both stressed that the priority had always been to simply finish the race, and that would be a feat in itself. They had done that. Medal to prove. What could possibly come next after the Marathon des Sables? The North Pole, of course: these boys never stop.

“Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge…
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue”
Wilfred Owen, 1918

 

Puck’s in for Oxford Ice Hockey

“5…4…3…2…1…” counted down the time-keeping official, after which the Oxford Blues were crowned the national champions of British Universities Ice Hockey.
Let’s backtrack 24 hours: “The last time Oxford won a national title of any kind, to the best of my knowledge, was in 1933,” read aloud Captain Julian de Hoog to his teammates at the team barbeque from the printed email he had received from team historian Michael “Moose” Talbot. The weight of history bore down on the Blues’ shoulders in that moment. But that wasn’t the only thing to be worried about: over half the team had not played a proper hockey game in six weeks, and the other half hadn’t done so in at least five due to difficulties scheduling on-ice practices over the Easter vacation.
The team was out of shape, and would also be missing its starting goaltender due to illness. David Putnins had been the team’s solid backstop in every league match, save one, during the season, posting league-leading stats. With him out, young Andy Peterson, called up from Oxford’s Tier II squad to play in his first Tier I league match, had some big shoes to fill.
But the next day the Blues showed why Oxford was ranked number one in BUIHA power rankings, capping off a perfect season with a 6-2 victory over the Nottingham Mavericks. The team took a while to shake off the rust, going down 1-0 and 2-1, but after shaking up the lines a little and a spectacular breakaway save by Peterson, all the pistons fired up and there was no turning back.
Oxford’s relentless forecheck caused numerous Maverick turnovers and produced a slew of offensive opportunities. The Blues notched five unanswered goals in the second and third periods. This was complemented by a shut-down performance from Peterson and the Oxford defense.
Due to technical difficulties the last six minutes had to be recorded on a stop watch and the time called out between whistles. Receiving the cup was the capping of a spectacular and unprecedented season for Oxford.
“Every player on the winning team gets their name on that trophy, and every player deserves it for the performance they put out tonight” stated Captain de Hoog.
Lubbock reflected on his feeling of relief, “not only on winning the British University League but also on maintaining our 100% winning record. I also felt good…for the OUIHC, which now has another chapter in its illustrious history.”

It’s a happy ending for the St John’s Fairytale

St John’s fairy tale season ended on a high at Iffley in 8th week, as they came out on top against Premiership champions Teddy Hall, in a tight and absorbing contest finally decided by a last minute strike from Blues’ squad member Adam Zagajewski.
In front of a sizeable crowd, Teddy Hall began the match as clear favourites against their lower league opponents, having gone undefeated since they lost to St Anne’s on the first day of the season. Boasting a defence which included three former or current Centaurs players, including Nicola Ielpo in goal, they also had the Premierships main goal threat in the form of the giant Charlie Southern. Their squad was further strengthened by the return of Talbot-Smith, who had flown back early from his placement in Russia for the tie. For the first half at least, the match looked to follow its predicted course. Teddy Hall were the more physical of the teams in the opening stages and St John’s looked very much like the underdogs which they had been billed as.
But despite having the majority of the territory and possession, Hall never really threatened to score. In fact, the two best chances of the first half fell to John’s, Evans-Young forcing a smart save out of Ielpo, and Zagajewski hitting a well struck volley on to see it come back off the inside of the post and roll agonisingly across the goal line before being cleared.
St John’s came out the stronger after the break and began to play their own game, Duff and Easthamkeeping the dangerous Southern in check, while the tireless Affron was a constant thorn in the side of his markers, winning everything in the air up front.
The deadlock was finally broken 15 minutes from time. Paul Forbes was released down the right wing and had the composure to pull the ball back across goal, allowing loitering right-back Newland to finish from six yards out.
With their supporters momentarily silenced, Teddy Hall were forced to throw numbers forward, going to three at the back and, for the first time, began to exert concerted pressure on the John’s goal. Despite the constant threat, as the clock continued to wind down it looked as though Hall would miss out for the second year in a row. However, with five minutes left to play, John’s conceded the ball in a dangerous position, allowing Southern to find space on the edge of the box and rifle a shot past the stranded Berend.
With the crowds taunts still ringing in their ears, John’s almost conceded again from the restart, a rare mistake at the back leaving Southern in clear, but this time Berend was up to the challenge.
Just as extra-time seemed inevitable, the game was settled for good by Zagajewski. A mix-up between Ielpo and Gilbert allowed the diminutive striker to pounce on the loose ball and somehow bend the ball into the top corner from the by-line, sparking wild celebrations and an impromptu pitch invasion when the final whistle blew.
Questions remain as to whether the little Yorkshireman was in fact attempting to cross the ball, but he was unequivocal in his response when asked, as he stated ‘you’ve just got to back yourself from there’.