Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2100

Boffins reveal chess gender gap

The champions of chess are mostly men, but this is not due to male ability. An Oxford University study has revealed that there are simply too few women in the game.

Men outnumber women by 16:1 in the German chess federation.

Merim Bilalic, a member of Oxford’s research team, stated that when 100 of the best men played the 100 of the best women, the men played slightly better. But 96% of the difference was due to more men playing chess overall.
There has not been a female world or British chess champion.

Different year, same prediction

Cuppers rugby has become one of the most predictable competitions in Oxford sport. The engravers charged with applying each winner’s name on the trophy are probably in danger of contracting repetitive strain injuries from carving the names of Teddy Hall and Keble so often. The fact that many of the top teams in the college leagues add to their squads with several Blues players, means that for many other teams competing, a quarter final place is a huge achievement, a good showing in the plate more realistic. While this may all sound very pessimistic, looking down the list of potential favourites for this year does little to suggest that we have any reason to change our expectations.

Keble, who have dominated the college scene on all fronts in the last few years, will, as usual, consider themselves the number one seed in 2009. Although they had a hiccup in losing to Pembroke last term, the additions of Blues stalwarts such as McKercher and Ackroyd should make them too strong a prospect for almost every other team. In all, they boast four players from the Blues squad, with other reinforcements coming from the Greyhounds and U-21s. They will also be especially eager to avenge last years defeat in the final to Teddy Hall, and are unlikely to make the same mistakes as they did last year, when they left out a number of their first choice players. After Magdalen’s loss this week, Keble have once again ascended to their perch on top of the league table, a position they are now used to occupying. As they continue to grow in confidence, it will take a huge effort to bring the college rugby giants to their knees this time around.

Last years winning finalist, and historically the most successful team in Cuppers, Teddy Hall, would be ecstatic if they were able to repeat last years victory. They would usually be the team who Keble would be most wary of going into the competition, but an indifferent year for the normally consistent Hall culminated last week in a thorough drubbing by Keble. Looking likely to finish fourth in the league this term, they will have to pull something very special out of the bag if they are to give themselves a chance of progressing to the final. Although they will welcome back a number of university players, this may not be enough to bridge the gap between themselves and those top teams who are currently exhibiting better form.
In fact, if form itself were the acid test for a teams likely performance in Cuppers, then you would have to point towards Magdalen and Pembroke as the other two teams with the most convincing claim to the crown. Pembroke have built on their double promotion last year to establish themselves as one of the top sides, and go into this last week having only lost to Magdalen. They pushed Keble hard in the semi-finals in 2008, and will be looking to go one better this time around.

However, they will be without talismanic back Tim Catling, with the Varsity Match hero currently out of the country. In fact, Pembroke will only be able to count on one player returning from Blues 1st team duties, which may not prove enough in a competition where the amount of Blues players turning out for their college side often proves the difference. Magdalen however, although only having lost one match before this week, to St. Anne’s St John’s, they were on the end of a thorough beating at the hands of Christ Church on Tuesday. Their inability to field a competent back-line for an important league game is an ominous sign, and they’ll hope the same thing doesn’t happen when they come up against better opposition.

Although, as is usually the case, the teams in the top division will dominate most peoples predictions for favourites, there are two teams outside the highest echelon of college rugby that will make for very interesting prospects. Univ have had a mixed season, and will need to put in a good performance this week to avoid relegation to the third division. However, their starting XV will most likely be unrecognisable next week, as they add to their squad will a whole raft of university players. Into their backs come Jon Burnett and Luke Fenwick from the Blues’ squad, whilst this years U-21s side contained no less than seven Univ players, many of them in the pack. Although no longer able to rely on the electric pace of Boto at outside centre, the strength throughout the team which they will experience in Cuppers will make them the dark horse of the competition and definitely one which the other teams will be looking over their shoulders for. Depending on the draw they receive, I’d predict them to reach the final.

Although Univ may be the most likely team outside Div 1 to launch an assault, as their Cuppers credentials have been proven in previous years, the most surprising contender for this years tournament should be Worcester. They will be something of an unknown quantity this time around, and anyone who has played them this season would find it astonishing that they are even being mentioned alongside the other teams in this article. They have been utterly woeful in the league this year, and face the ignominy of being relegated to the fourth division if they fail to get a result against New this Thursday. For a team that was playing its rugby in the second division at the beginning of the year, that would be a spectacular fall from grace.
However, if their league side are not quite up to scratch, the recruits which they should be getting in the next few weeks are of a slightly higher calibre. From the Blues squad they can expect to add four players to their pack. This would make a huge difference for any team, and will turn them into a formidable forward unit.

But it is the man who could be pulling on the number two jersey for them that will provoke most interest. It would be quite a sight to see Anton Oliver, capped 57 times by New Zealand, packing down against another College side. Most teams will be praying that they won’t have to face this prospect, and although their backs will probably not be strong enough for them to reach the semis, the damage which could be done in the early rounds could be quite dangerous.

I would advise any captain, if they found out they were playing a Worcester front row including Oliver and Dan Rosen, another hooker who has features in the Blues squad this year, to claim a lack of front row players and go straight to uncontested scrums. Not only would it stop embarrassment at set piece time, and isolate Worcester’s most potent weapon, but it may also avoid serious injury, especially for the rather less experienced front rows in college rugby.

But despite all this talk of upset and unlikely victors, it is probable, in this most consistent of tournaments, that the silverware hoarders of Keble will once again have their day. Although it would be nice for the engravers if they could have some variety in their work at this time of year, it looks like we’ll have to wait until next year. Let’s hope I’m proven wrong this time.

 

Review: Mankind

Georgia Sawyer’s Mankind is a modern adaption of a medieval morality play that, in its original context, was designed to instruct its audience in appropriate Christian behaviour. It is peopled with a wide variety of allegorical figures. The austere Mercy (Tom Bishop) offers Mankind (Matt Monaghan) the chance for redemption, while the forces of temptation, including the devil Titivillus (Eva Tausig), try to bring about his damnation.

While this would seem to suggest a strait-laced moral lecture, the theatrical experiance is almost manic in its variety and vivacity. The whole production is charged with intense passion for the subject matter and determination to bring it to life for a modern audience. When the evil creatures Newguise, Nowadays and Nought are on the stage, the action relies heavily on the simple, physical comedy of the pantomime and barely a moment passes without a bawdy double entendre, a suggestive pelvic thrust or a knowing wink.

Live music is constantly woven in and out of the play and is performed with aplomb. In line with their allegorical natures, each moves with a sense of deeper purpose: the devils low to the ground, Mankind uncertain yet sensitive, Titivillus langorous and sensual, and Mercy with his hands firmly clasped in prayer. The set and costume reflect the moral landscape through which the play moves. There is little ostentation through props and all the characters are dressed in black and distinguished only by their shoes. All of these confusing factors taken together add up to a deliciously various but slightly chaotic product.

The play is sign-posted as ‘high art’ through the doffing of costume in favour of black clothing yet seems to rely heavily on the ‘low art’ techniques of pantomime and burlesque. For me this juxtaposition felt interesting but I could equally see how it could infuriate someone with strict ideas of theatrical propriety. Mankind represents an authentic gesture towards a different sense of theatre, one where the lines between audience and actors are thin and often crossed, as the smoke filled atmosphere of the medieval tavern or the wagon of a band of travelling performers.

Thirst Lodge lap-dance plans binned

Thirst Lodge, a popular nightclub and cocktail bar, has abandoned its plans to host lap-dancing nights after mass opposition from residents and students.

The club withdrew its application for a lap-dancing licence after the parishioners of nearby St Ebbe’s Church voiced outrage at the proposal.

Members of the church, whose entrance is 20 feet from the club, have also accused Thirst of failing to advertise the plans properly, meaning they had no chance to raise their concerns during the council’s period of consultation.

Rector Vaughan Roberts said that the lap-dancing would be “unacceptable not only next to our building but anywhere in our city.”

Regulars at the church echoed the rector’s disgust at the plans. A Hertford student attending St Ebbe’s said, “it’s horrible. I find it really weird. It’s just a massive juxtaposition to walk out of the lap-dancing club and then see the church.”

Rachel Cummings, the OUSU Women’s Officer, expressed her condemnation of the application. She said, “lap-dancing is abhorrent; it’s an activity which presents women as sexual items existing for the entertainment of men.

“Any club holding a lap-dancing license needs to recognise that this activity is degrading. Many customers will no longer feel comfortable attending the club on any of its nights.”

This view has been echoed by Christian groups. Claire Greig, vice president of the Oxford Inter-Collegiate Christian Union said, “we are saddened by the fact that the Thirst Lodge is hosting these nights which involve practices degrading to women, and we hope that the license will not be granted.”

William Iles, 1st year PPE student said, “Thirst Lodge is one of my favorite clubs in Oxford. I was really relieved that is not going to compromise its reputation amongst students by becoming seedy.”

The venue had applied for a variation in its license in early January, asking to offer lap-dancing as part of its entertainment. Clubs doing this must advertise the move both in local papers and on the premises.

Abrahams added, “we learnt of the story very late, we heard it one day after the last day of objections. The ward councilor e-mailed me on the 19th, the day before the deadline informing me about this. However, I picked it up on the 20th, the deadline.”

He noted that he was “worried about the type of people it [the venue] will attract.” This led him to contact the police for consultation.

Rector Vaughan Roberts said that “very strong opposition to the application would have been expressed if it had been known to the public.”

After sparking outrage among the local community, the venue decided to withdraw the application on the morning of the 27th of January. Its spokesperson said, “we’ve withdrawn the application after consultation with the public and our neighbours from the church.”

A spokesperson for Greene King, the license holders of Thirst, said, “the licencee and Greene King have held discussions and decided to withdraw the licence application for the Thirst Lodge. No further applications of this type will be submitted for the pub.”

Mark Abrahams expressed his relief at the withdrawal of application saying, “we’re very grateful that this has ended like this. I think the last session of council which was supposed to be on Thursday is being withdrawn now.”

The decision about the cancellation of the licensing hearing was confirmed by the Oxford City Council.

 

 

Fire services investigate Oxford nightclubs

Fire services are investigating claims that students’ safety may be at risk after a Cherwell investigation has revealed that three Oxford nightclubs could be lacking basic fire safety precautions.

Cherwell investigation of eight nightclubs in Oxford has raised concerns about the compliance of Kukui, Escape, and OFS with fire regulations as stated in the Regulatory Reform Fire Safety Order 2005.

These concerns are being followed up on by the Oxfordshire Fire Service.

The Order states that all employees must be given adequate fire safety training when they commence employment as well as receiving refreshers as appropriate. This must include training in the use of fire equipment.

But staff at the clubs interviewed by Cherwell indicated that they had never received any fire training, a finding described as very disturbing by the fire service.

One Kukui staff member said that the club’s fire and safety training is “pretty casual.” She said they had taken no action for almost half an hour on one occasion when the fire alarm went off in the upstairs of the club.

She said, “the fire alarm went off last November for 25 minutes upstairs. They couldn’t hear it downstairs. I didn’t do anything. People were in the club. Someone eventually heard it and went and told the staff downstairs.” She added, “the alarm was fixed afterwards.”

She also said that she had not experienced any fire drills while she had been working at the club, admitting that she only knew how to use a fire extinguisher from her previous job.

Another staff member also admitted that the club had not trained her to use fire extinguishers.

Two other staff members who have been working at Kukui since October said that they too had never received any fire training at the club.

At Escape, staff spoken to by Cherwell had also received no fire training. One staff member admitted that he couldn’t even use a fire extinguisher.

They mentioned that the club had mock drills but that these were “not treated seriously.” They said that if there is a fire “we just go out” and that there is no specific fire plan. The club also had no first aider present.

At OFS, one staff member said, “there is no fire training due to the company rules.” They added, however, that they knew where the fire extinguishers were and that there was a register for staff signing in and out.

Pat Rosen, the Station Officer of the Oxfordshire Fire Brigade, commented on the results of the investigation, saying, “obviously we’re very disturbed at the findings of this investigation and we’ll be following it up.”

“I’m going to pass the details to the Council and we’ll start the inspection. This will consist of visiting the clubs and talking to the owners.”

Both Kukui and Escape were visited by the Oxfordshire Fire Service on Tuesday. However, both clubs denied claims about negligence in adhering to fire and safety regulations.

The general manager of Kukui said the fire services had visited the club and found that they were complying with fire and safety regulations. He said, “we are 100% complying with regulations across the land.”

He added, “all staff, including bouncers, before we opened our doors, had had fire training.”

When confronted with the evidence from our investigation, he said, “we have recently taken on new staff” and suggested that it was these people whom our investigators had spoken to.

He also said, “I have a record of all my staff members who have signed to say that they have received fire training.”

Barry Stockford, a member of the Fire Prevention Team, commented, “our response yesterday was immediate. The records of the clubs were satisfactory but we couldn’t validate this in terms of questioning staff and we will be following that up in the next few weeks with fire audits.”

He also added that the Fire Services were “far from dismissive of this.”

Pulse, the student run club promotions company, which has organised several events at both Escape and OFS, commented, “PulseNation exists to give students the best night out possible. We only work with people we think will support us in achieving this aim and we are confident that all the venues we work with are complying with the rules. If people are claiming otherwise we’ll speak to the management teams, but we’re committed to providing students with safe, fun and cheap nights out.”

Pulse has worked in collaboration with OUSU since last year.

Rosanna McBeath, OUSU’s VP for welfare, said, “student safety is very important, especially when out in clubs. OUSU knows that the staff at Pulse Nation do check that clubs are complying with Fire Safety laws, we wouldn’t have agreed to collaborate with them otherwise. At the end of the day, though, Pulse Nation has to take the club operators at their word. I hope in light of this investigation both the clubs and the authorities work harder to ensure that fire safety standards are complied with.”

Several students have expressed distress at the findings of the investigation.

Victoria Turk, Oriel JCR Entz rep, added, “it also worries me that Escape doesn’t have anyone who could help with medical problems, as I’m sure these occur frequently among clubbers.”

Alexander Bulfin, JCR President of University, commented, “The question should not be whether Entz Officers should sell tickets to nights at these venues, but whether club night organisers should be using them in the first instance. Students and JCRs pay these promoters to organise nights out for them – this should mean ensuring that it is safe as well as fun and value for money.”

Other students have revealed their lack of concern about fire safety when out clubbing.

Rachel Chew, a St Peter’s first-year, added, “I usually don’t look where the fire exits are as I feel safe and I trust the organisers.”

 

 

Kukui to face license review

Kukui nightclub is facing a licence review following complaints that the club is failing to address crime and disorder taking place on the premises and is neglecting public safety issues.

Police have expressed concerns that Kukui is neglecting these important matters and have therefore forced Kukui to face a compulsory review of its licence. The review could result in the club having to close.

Last term saw two serious glassing incidents at the pacific island themed club on Park End Street. Both incidents resulted in hospital treatment for those involved.

Since Kukui’s opening in August, police have been called out 22 times.

Police licensing officer Tony Cope told the Oxford Mail “Thames Valley Police has had meetings with the management on several occasions to express concerns”, and that the local force felt that “due to the seriousness, rather than the number of incidents, a review of the licence is the only option left to address these issues.”

A spokeswoman for Kukui said that the two glassing incidents had “been handled in the perfect manner”, and added that the club had now gone seven weeks without a violent incident.

She denied that the club was in danger of being closed down, stating that, “the licensing officer has told us that we are not even on the radar as a problem club”.

She said of the license review that “revocation” was extremely unlike, saying “the licensing authority has confirmed to us that revocation is not their intention, as have the council”.

The press office for Oxford City Council said that problems surrounding capacity had been another issue involved in the decision to call a licensing hearing.

However, Kukui’s spokesperson denied that the club was frequently overcrowded, commenting that “we do not run Kukui at capacity because it affects the level of service that we try to achieve.”

Asked about problems with queuing outside the club, she blamed council policy that refused the club permission to allow smokers to use the club’s terrace.

She said, “due to the council not allowing us to use our terrace for smoking we are forced to put smokers at the front of the venue which is always going to have an effect on queuing options.”

She claimed that Oxford police had voiced support for Kukui’s opposition to the council ban and had agreed that allowing smoking on the terrace “would alleviate any possible issues with regards to queuing”.

Many students have expressed similar concerns to those voiced by the authoritties.

One second-year student spoke of the violence that had taken place within the club, as well as the issues of long queues and overcrowding, but added that closing the club was an unnecessary step. The student said,

“there are a lot of fights and stuff at Kukui, and the queues are always huge. I don’t think they need to close it down though.”

Kukui is the third Oxford club to have faced a licensing hearing recently.

Last April, Imperial was forced to close for six weeks and fire its premises supervisor, after a licensing review was called by police and health and safety officials.

Among the issues raised were an incident of mass brawling, dangerous electrical wiring and the fact that traces of cocaine had been found in the toilets.

Bridge was also reviewed last year after police complained about “the number of crime and disorder incidents at the premises”, and was forced to exchange glasses for plastic cups.

The official licensing review of the club is to be conducted in Oxford Town Hall, on February 26th.

 

Straight to DVD: Mob Doc

If you’re anything like me, then you probably take a certain pride in eschewing the usual standard fare thrown out with frightening regularity by the Hollywood machine.

When my life-partner Samantha and I walk past our local Odeon – or ‘Oh-No!-Deon’ as Sam calls it, the darling – we just have to laugh. If we didn’t, we might cry. We might cry rainbow tears on behalf of the oppressed billions around the world whose adorable ways of life simply aren’t recognised or represented by Spielberg and Weinstein. People like Samantha and I know that it’s not only a pleasure lost upon the sheep, but also our social duty, to look beyond what we’re being spoon-fed and ensure that we only ever visit independent cinemas or buy DVDs from the ‘world cinema’ section in Zavvi.

This is why I’m absolutely delighted to have recently struck underground pan-global alternative arthouse gold. Kenya’s Jitu studio has begun producing the films I’ve been waiting for all my life – films so non-mainstream that they seem both to actively embody my own personal brand, and to act as a long-overdue shot across the bows of Fox et al. What’s wonderful about Jitu’s latest, Mob Doc, is that it actively avoids almost every cinematic convention that’s been imposed, in an act of cultural colonialism that seems a bit dodgy, what with slavery and all that, by the Hollywood juggernaut. It takes a lot of strength to break free of these century-old shackles, but Jitu has managed it. They say no to ‘sets’, a ‘script’, so called ‘professional’ ‘sound and lighting’, real ‘actors’, a ‘budget’, and a ‘plot’.

Mob Doc is a comedy, but one through which the ancient spear of pathos has been thrown. You feel it powerfully from the moment the titles (done in Comic Sans in flagrant denial of the phoney mainstream belief in ‘making films look as if they weren’t produced by a child’) and as the film comes to deal with alcoholism, marital strife, racial tension and erectile dysfunction, you find yourself welling up, such is the raw emotion of it all.

The film’s boldest and most powerful element is a sensitive exploration of transvestitism that, in a conservative country, has landed the studio in hot water. Yet, as Jitu point out, they have simply adopted a cultural convention with a proud history stretching back to the days of the ancient Greeks, and in so doing, united, after so many centuries of hatred, Europe and Africa, like so much concrete in the Mediterranean sea. It’s like slavery never happened.

Review: The Broken

When signing up to review The Broken I had no idea what kind of film it was. Thus the fact that I hated every second of it is arguably more a result of my intolerance to horror films than any fault on the behalf of the filmmakers (or my editors).

The story follows Gina, a beautiful young Londoner, played by Lena Heady. After getting into a car crash, she finds her grip on reality beginning to slip as her past and present bceome increasingly difficult to reconcile.

Ceilings leak, mirrors break and X-ray scans appear inversed as Gina tries to unravel what happened to her that day.

In terms of execution, one cannot help but compare it to Hitchcock’s timeless Psycho, or even more to Gus Van Sant’s dubious shot-for-shot remake. Although not in black and white, the palette of The Broken almost undetectably shifts to blue or greyscale for the scenes that are meant to send shivers all the way down to your toes.

The scenes appear fragmented from the very start, instead of freely flowing each begins separately, rhythmically adding to and subtracting from the dramatic tension. Sean Ellis almost apes Hitch’s indelible style and techniques. He keeps violence entirely absent from the first half of the film, but it is always bubbling away just below the surface so that by the time blood is drawn, the effect is nail-biting.

I have a suspicion that The Broken isn’t, in fact, as bad as it seemed whilst I watched it. It might even be quite good. So if you like your films to come with fear-inducing noises, everyday objects acting strangely, shifting identities, and at least a modicum of psychological trauma then this is one for you. Personally I am making sure I’m not sleeping on my own tonight

Somerville JCR fined £1000 for food fight damage

Somerville students have been fined £1,000 after a food fight broke out at the ebd of term dinner.

College property was damaged during the food fight, including an ornate silver jug and one of the Hall’s portraits.

A member of staff injured her wrist after slipping on food and was taken to the John Radcliffe Hospital as a precautionary measure.

College authorities were unable to identify which students were involved in the disorder. Instead they have fined the collective JCR budget, angering some students who were not at the event.

One third-year student expressed his annoyance at the decision. “I hadn’t even been to the dinner and can’t see why my JCR is spending part of my tuition fees on the fine.

“My fees are going on something that I’ve nothing to do with and I am not responsible for.”

James McDonnell, last term’s Dean at Somerville, justified the decision to impose a collective punishment, emphasizing that “the most just solution would be for the culprits to come forward” but that students had refused to incriminate their friends.

He expressed regret that despite the presence of several elected JCR representatives at the meal “who could help identify those who were guilty” they “miraculously saw nothing” of the event.

“I do understand the culture of not wanting to identify fellow students to the College authorities, but it does limit our ability to deal with this in the most just way possible. In the absence of any cooperation I’m afraid the JCR fine is what we are left with.”

Somerville student Dexter Harries explained that the incident “was not malicious” but that “the situation just got out of control”.

“Everyone was drunk and messing around but they didn’t want anyone to get hurt. I think they all feel pretty bad about that. But I’m not sure that punishing the whole JCR was the right move.”

In an email to undergraduates JCR President Stavros Orfanos accepted the fine while expressing his regret that the “money has to be spent this way” rather than “on opportunities that could benefit us all”.

He provided a breakdown of the fine, including £280 to pay for the clean-up operation. Repairing the damaged silverware cost the college £585.