Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Blog Page 2114

Musical Expeditions: Jazz in Prague

0

Jazz music has a special place in the history of the Czech Republic. During the years of Communist rule, jazz was a medium through which, as veteran saxophonist Jan Štolba put it to me, musicians expressed their ‘dreams about what was beyond the borders’. It played a part in the lead-up to the Velvet Revolution – which overthrew the Communist regime in Czechoslovakia in 1989 – as something which brought together like-minded dissidents. In the aftermath of the revolution, it came to be seen as symbolic of the anti-Communist movement.

Today jazz is everywhere in Prague, but has it become mere fodder for tourists in search of the Communist past, or does the tradition remain strong?

If you head out at random to one of Prague’s many jazz clubs, you might well conclude that the former is the case. With expert guidance, on the other hand, you can find world-class music in incredible venues. Tony Emmerson, an English expat who writes a Prague Jazz blog, was kind enough to point me in the right direction at every turn.

AghaRTA Jazz Centrum is not far from Old Town Square. At the end of a lamp-lit alley you come to the entrance, and through it a flight of stairs. Following these down, you find yourself in a high, single-vaulted cellar with walls built of old, irregular bricks which are held together by crumbling plaster – it could easily be the guts of an Oxford college. The music at AghaRTA, Tony told me, can generally be relied upon to be good. This might have something to do with the fact that one of the owners, Michal Hejna, is himself a musician.

The night I went along he was playing drums for Rhythm Desperados, a light-hearted conglomerate of prominent Czech musicians, who each have other more serious things going on as well. The standard was first-rate, each of the performers putting in numerous elaborate solos. What was most impressive about this band was the infectious pleasure they obviously derived from playing together. The camaraderie among musicians such as these, whose shared experiences in Communist times united them in exceptionally close friendships, is one of the most enchanting and particular things about jazz in the Czech Republic.

The other place Tony recommended was Jazz Dock, an entirely different setting, scarcely four months old. It’s a waterfront venue, as the name implies, situated in the Smichov area of the city. Floor-to-ceiling picture windows give on to a narrow, secluded stretch of Prague’s Vltava river, traced on one side by the tree-lined banks of an island, and on the other by an ornate 18th-century terrace. The walls are a crisp purple and the bar is lime green, making for an impressive overall effect. You can go throughout the day for food and drink, but it’s really a late-night establishment: open daily till 4.00 a.m. with the music continuing past 1.00. The mainly Czech crowd starts turning up about 9.00 and by the time the music starts at 10.00 it’s full up.

Both nights I was there the music was outstanding. On the first occasion I saw the Ondrej Pivec Organic Quartet. Pivec, who leads the quartet on the Hammond organ, is only twenty-five but has already participated in the recording of ten CDs, three times as the title musician, and studied under some of the masters of the instrument. His playing ranged from choppy and aggressive (imagine The Band’s Garth Hudson on Bob Dylan – Live 1966) to mellow and sweet – the versatility of the instrument, Ondrej told me after the gig, is an aspect of it he particularly relishes. The guitarist, Libor Šmoldas, contributed tuneful riffs á la Django Reinhardt, as well as a stage-presence reminiscent of the smiling innocence of 50s and early-60s pop-groups. Saxophone and drums completed the quartet, whose overall sound was lively, rich, and intriguing. From the evidence of this group, Czech jazz is very much alive.

The next thing I saw at Jazz Dock was far more classic in character. Karel Rùžička, pianist, was an important figure in Czech jazz during the Communist era and is now something of a legend. Tonight he was accompanied by his Grammy- nominated son, New York-based saxophonist Karel Rùžička jr., in addition to the bassist and drummer he usually plays with. The compositions were mainly driven by the saxophone of Karel Rùžička jr., full-bodied and strong, and played with a freedom reminiscent of Snonny Rollins and John Coltrane, but all four musicians were exceptional. Present at the concert was one Libor Pešek, a noteworthy composer of classical music from Communist times. The quartet played a piece in his honour, during which he sat stage-side, with a warm expression of gratitude on his face – a moving scene and further illustration of the special camaraderie and respect that exist between musicians, especially older ones, in the Czech Republic.

You’re unlikely to hear bad music at any of the main jazz clubs in Prague, but at certain venues you might find the experience underwhelming. At Blues Sklep I saw the Fabrik Quartet – great sound in a handsome cellar – but the audience was utterly depressing, consisting, apart from the group I was with, of a pair of drooping couples, who remained unresponsive to the music throughout, restricting their activities to awkward glances at their respective partners, quite obviously wondering what the hell they were doing there.

This other side of the Prague jazz scene is perhaps typified by Reduta Jazz Club. Founded in 1958, the city’s oldest jazz club rose to fame in 1994, when Bill Clinton was taken there by Václav Havel (then the President of the Czech Republic) and ended up on stage playing saxophone. Thanks largely to this occasion, photographs of which adorn the walls, it is hugely popular with tourists, though these days it is most likely not the best place in Prague to go and hear some jazz.

So… an exceptionally good, and uniquely interesting, jazz scene can be numbered among the many attractions of the capital of the Czech Republic. Its charms are not evident at every Prague jazz club but they are there to be discovered. Where’s best to find them is, of course, subject to change, but for the time being, at least, they’re not about to go away altogether. There’s currently a movement, mainly being advanced by the elder statesmen of Czech jazz, to ensure the continued prosperity of Czech jazz. The evidence of this is free festivals being put on across the country – of which there happened to be a two-day one going on in the city-centre during my time in Prague. One sincerely hopes the movement is successful, and that the rich tradition of jazz in this country is not allowed to become something of the past.

 

Prime Minister visits Labour Club

0

Gordon Brown has visited members of Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) to congratulate them on the results of the local elections.

Visiting on 21st July, he praised OULC’s “brilliant contribution to progressive politics in the University, the city and the country.”

Gordon Brown was in Oxford for the TED Global Conference in which he gave a speech on collective action to solve global problems.

Ben Lyons, co-chair of OULC said, “the results are a reflection of the consistent hard work put in by OULC members and supporters… I’m confident that we can continue to buck the national trend in Oxford.”

Labour gained four seats in Oxford in the June elections. The biggest gains came in student areas such as Isis, which contains Magdalen, New College and St Catherine’s. The Conservatives failed to make any gains in Oxford and the Oxford University Conservative Organisation (OUCA) did not actively campaign in the area.

 

Oxford cavers call out spanish rescue team

0

Students from Oxford University Cave Club were rescued in northern Spain last week after spending a night trapped underground.

The group of four students was cut off due to a flooding in the Picos de Europa mountain range.

Fortunately, the hikers had stocked up on emergency supplies and were able to keep warm. The club chairman, Paul Savage, confirmed that no members of the group were hurt. He added, “At no time were they in any danger, they were just unlucky I guess, but it makes the club look a bit silly doesn’t it.”

Two members of the same trip were also rescued earlier on 26 July after letting go of their rope.

 

Summertime Superpowers: Manchester and Madrid

0

Taking a walk around the centre of Manchester these days, you can’t help but notice an increasing abundance of the smuggest, most self-congratulatory football shirt that this town has produced in a long, long time: TEVEZ, 32. And, of course, it is printed onto City sky blue. For United fans, the Argentine is now an unforgivable traitor, the man who not only defected to the upstart locals, but the previously revered terrace-favourite who aimed some sacrilegious parting blows at Ferguson, too.

For City fans, his scamper to Eastlands is heroic: the giant ‘Welcome to Manchester’ billboard erected by quick-thinking publicists evokes that decades-old City refrain about Old Trafford lying outside the town’s borders- the Blues are laughing loudly, and loving every minute of this pre-season.

Tevez arrives with a cohort of other expensive talents (and towering expectations for one of the league’s most consistently inconsistent clubs) in the most ambitious sporting revolution since Ambramovich bought 2 Premier League titles for Chelsea in 2005 and 2006. But, as the saying goes, football isn’t played on paper, nor on bank cheques for that matter, and City have everything yet to prove on the pitch.

Powerful financial backing has brought success before in our domestic game, but the only guarantee becomes the inevitable pressure to perform: in this respect, Mark Hughes might get off lightly compared to Manuel Pellegrini, a manager who must handle the looming paradox of being in football’s most enviable and unenviable position simultaneously- Madrid’s ownership demands that mountains move, a task not incomparable to toppling the empire of footballing sublimity that has risen in Barcelona.

Real Madrid’s heavyweight spending trumps even City’s- the combination of power, prestige and potential has lured the world’s most devastating attackers in Ronaldo and Kaka, each at record fees, along with a group of undoubted quality. Ronaldo’s painless acclimation will be crucial for Real, in a league which many pundits believe is taylor-made for his particular brand of high-speed, technically superior football.

The relentless Florentino Pérez is difficult to satisfy (in 2003, he fired Vicente del Bosque for delivering only the European Cup), and the question remains whether a team with obvious defensive deficiences can the scale the heights which the club craves for itself. Madrid’s progress in Spain and Europe will be intriguing for English fans, particularly given the likelihood of a meeting with one our top four at some stage in the Champions League.

Certainly, Manchester and Madrid have been the epicentres of this summer’s transfer activity- United have lost a valued player to both City and Real, two teams who have between them shaken European football profoundly. Does it not almost seem that many major transfers, when not involving either of these clubs, are instigated with a view to replacing players whom this new axis of power has already swooped to capture? Valencia to United, Glen Johnson to Liverpool, even Fabian Delph to Aston Villa- the reverberative effect of Abu Dhabi City and Galacticos II will surely continue to ring for any number of seasons, both on the field and in the transfer market.

Only European qualification, as an absolute minimum, will be accepted at City, and Madrid have targeted every possible trophy as the justification for its blazing achievements in funding and recruitment. As the new season draws close, the strengths of the big spenders will soon be tested: only then can we form some early judgements, when the speculation is silenced and goals become more valuable than pounds.

 

Tariq Ramadan the new Islamic Studies Chair

0

Professor Tariq Ramadan, Research Fellow at St Antony’s College, has been appointed His Highness Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani Chair in Contemporary Islamic Studies.

His role will begin on 1st September 2009. 

Prof. Ramadan is a world-renowned scholar. He has previously worked on a government task force devising policies to counter Islamic extremism in Britain.

Ramadan expressed gratitude for his appointment and commented, “such a chair is very much needed today and I am personally committed to making Oxford a centre of excellence on contemporary Islamic issues with worldwide academic connection.”

The Chair of the Faculty of Oriental Studies Jeremy Johns said, “Professor Ramadan will add a new dimension to our teaching and research, and ensure that the work of the Faculty will in future have direct impact upon contemporary debates and developments.”

 

Oxford scientists discover transparent aluminium

0

Oxford scientists working in Hamburg claim to have discovered transparent aluminium with the use of laser technology.

The experiment involved a short pulse from a laser, which removed a core electron from every aluminium atom in a sample.

Professor Justin Wark of Oxford University’s Department of Physics said, “What we have created is a completely new state of matter nobody has seen before.”

The aluminium was transparent for only 40 femtoseconds – a fraction of a nanosecond. However, this discovery is significant because it may lead to greater understanding of the creation of miniature stars created during laser implosions.

“It’s almost as surprising as finding that you can turn lead into gold with light,” said Prof. Wark.

 

Miliband defends government’s climate change policy

0

This week, Energy and Climate Change Minister Ed Miliband spoke in Oxford to set out his plans for a low-carbon Britain. Organised by Friends of the Earth Oxford, whose aim was to challenge Miliband on government policy towards climate change ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December, the evening also featured a soon-to-be-unemployed wind turbine manufacturer and four high-profile climate change scientists and activists.

The event gathered a surprising amount of interest. The event had to move from the small to the biggest room in the Town Hall, where hundreds of people were seated or stood around the edges.

Miliband looked nervous when he waited for things to begin. This is probably because of the extra act scheduled: one of 500 employees at Britain’s only wind turbine manufacturing plant which was about to be closed. The plant announced its closure in April and many have since asked why the government has refused to save it.

‘It’s not about the money’, answered Miliband. Vestas, the Danish company that owns the plant stated that it shut because there is no demand for its turbines. 60% of planning applications for onshore wind farms in Britain are turned down because of local opposition, so the company is stepping up production in the US and China instead.

Mliband argued that as the government could not just nationalise the plant, and that no other company had come forward to buy it from Vestas, its closure was unavoidable. The claim that nationalisation was impossible was met with opposition by the audience; one man cited the wave of recent government takeovers of companies hit by the credit crisis, but Miliband stuck to his position.

Many questioned followed, to the enthusiasm of the audience. ‘Why doesn’t the government do more to educate people about the dangers of catastrophic climate change?’ got the biggest cheer, and ‘Why is it cheaper to fly to Rome than to take the train?’ got another. Answering the first question, Miliband pointed out that constant scare warnings were counterproductive. You have to offer people something positive to get them to change.

Replying to the second question, Miliband stated, ‘domestic flights have got to become more expensive…We have argued strongly for aviation to be included in the European Emissions Trading Scheme. Personally I think aviation is undertaxed.’ Miliband went on to say, ‘we have an 80% reduction target. If we cut aviation emissions by that by 2050, we’d go back to 1974 levels of flying. But the world is getting closer together, not further apart.’ He concluded by saying that flying is so important, especially for the young, that cuts would have to be made in other areas.

Miliband used the phrase ‘let me be candid with you’ about seven times during the evening, but overall he was a fairly good speaker. He addressed all questions fired at him thoroughly and exhorted the audience to get involved in activism in the lead-up to Copenhagen. He added that the silent majority in favour of wind power must do more to stop planning applications being rejected by a small vocal minority.

Green activists were however unsatisfied with the course of the event. They wanted the evening to show Miliband clearly that a large section of the public wanted more ambitious green policies. The set-up of the event was good for people who wanted a chance to hear Miliband’s policies on a number of different issues, but frustrating for those who knew what the policies were, disagreed with them, and wanted to see Miliband grilled.

Ian Leggett, Director of People and Planet, the largest student network in Britain campaigning to end world poverty and protect the environment, concluded the evening by saying that Copenhagen would probably be the most important climate talks ever to take place. Britain is now one of the leading nations in climate change policy, so it will indeed be interesting to see what Miliband has to say then.

 

A Missed Opportunity

0

	To make a bold assumtpion; if  you are persevering with this blog you either
a) really really love your cricket, or b) or one of the following: My Dad,
my American girlfriend who couldn't pick Shane Warne out of a line-up, or
the guy who sits next to me at work. For all those in the first category,
I'd point you toward, if you haven't seen it already, Tim de Lisle's
outstanding article on cricinfo called "Are you England in disguise?".

I've been trying to decide who gets to be self-satisfied in that last test.
On one hand, England outplayed the Australians for all but a day out of
four. They bowled willingly, and fairly well, they batted decently, and best
of all, they have played below their optimum, and still looked better than
an Australian side whose bowling attack is looking pretty average. They have
avoided the pain of not winning a winnable test by not getting that close to
victory in the final analysis also.

On the other hand, Australia aren't 2-0 down, which was a real possibility
at 10.30 on Monday. They have probably the best two batsmen on either side
(Clarke and Ponting, closely followed by Strauss), of which the former looks
like increasingly an irresistible cross-breed between the Waugh twins,
reliable and beautiful in equal measure. Mitchell Johnson has found some red
blood left in him, and his bowling, whilst not back to its best, showed good
signs. Brett Lee, a leader, and in his own right, a wonderful bowler, is
probably going to be back soon. His return will be an immeasurable boost,
despite the kick in the teeth it will be for, most probably, Peter Siddle.
Unless Hauritz is rather harshly dropped, Stuart Clarke will probably miss
out too, although at Headingly, he would be a good bet. Graham Manou looks a
capable understudy to the excellent and unlucky Haddin. Maybe things will
fall into place after all...

England would be well advised to drop Broad for Sidebottom. He may well be a
good batsman, he may well be better looking than Andrew Strauss, but Stuart
Broad isn't the wicket-taker we need him to be, and with Flintoff bowling at
full speed and half-fitness, we need a genuine swing bowler to complement
the now-indispensible Anderson. If England want to retain pace, they could
just play Harmison. Either way, picking Broad would be an error. Dropping
Bopara for Trott would also be a good shout. Bopara has been found out by
bowlers admittedly better than the West Indies. Like Hussain, that weird-ass
technique needs a-polishing before he can come back and dominate like his
instincts tell him to.

So, to Headingly, dear friends, where the crowd roars, and the clouds cover,
and the ball swings. If you look carefully, the ghost of Botham and Willis
still wanders round at every decent moment for England in a Headingly Ashes
test, although you probably won't need to listen carefully, as they haven't
shut up about it all bloody summer.

Tories’ uni lives captured by Channel 4

0

A drama about David Cameron and Boris Johnson’s time at Oxford University has been commissioned by Channel 4.

The programme will focus on the pair’s controversial membership of the notorious Bullingdon Club in the late 1980s. The Club is famous for its excessive drinking sessions where members often trash venues and then offer large sums of money to pay for the damage.

“Everyone has seen the famous Bullingdon Club picture, but this film goes behind the scenes to find out what Oxford was really like for David Cameron and Boris Johnson,” said director John Dower.

“We have talked to those who knew them at the time to document the roots of the two men at the forefront of the current recovery of the Tory party.”

The film is to be broadcast on More4 in autumn. The timing of the broadcast, in the run-up to an election, has attracted criticism from Tory MPs who are concerned it may influence voters. Philip Davies, a member of the House of Commons Committee on Culture, Media and Sport, said the timing of the programme left Channel 4 open to “accusations they are pursuing an agenda”. 

Cameron will be played by Cambridge graduate Jonny Sweet, a relatively unknown comedy actor who has appeared in cult comedy “The Inbetweeners” and who took his one man show “Mostly About Arthur” to the Edinburgh Fringe this summer. 

The part of Boris Johnson is to be played by Christian Brassington, who previously played an undergraduate Tony Blair in the 2006 television drama “Tony Blair: Rock Star”.

 

‘Bloggers bid to break back of BCA

You may have read about the British Chiropractic Association’s ‘misconceived’ attempt to sue science journalist Simon Singh for his comments about the dubious basis in evidence for this alternative therapy. There is plenty of quality ire about this topic online already, so I won’t be adding to the hubbub; but if you’re feeling keen, Ben Goldacre has a pretty comprehensive round-up.

After legal action was sought, the Guardian piece in question was taken down. Today, encouraged by the charity Sense About Science, a veritable shedload of websites have republished the article minus the allegedly libellous comments. It is worth noting that the BCA only objected to two sentences.

If you have a ’blog, feel free to either republish or link to this, or any of the other copies of the article online.

Beware the spinal trap

Some practitioners claim it is a cure-all, but the research suggests chiropractic therapy has mixed results—and can even be lethal, says Simon Singh.

You might be surprised to know that the founder of chiropractic therapy, Daniel David Palmer, wrote that ‘99% of all diseases are caused by displaced vertebrae’. In the 1860s, Palmer began to develop his theory that the spine was involved in almost every illness because the spinal cord connects the brain to the rest of the body. Therefore any misalignment could cause a problem in distant parts of the body.

In fact, Palmer’s first chiropractic intervention supposedly cured a man who had been profoundly deaf for 17 years. His second treatment was equally strange, because he claimed that he treated a patient with heart trouble by correcting a displaced vertebra.

You might think that modern chiropractors restrict themselves to treating back problems, but in fact some still possess quite wacky ideas. The fundamentalists argue that they can cure anything, including helping treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying—even though there is not a jot of evidence.

I can confidently label these assertions as utter nonsense because I have co-authored a book about alternative medicine with the world’s first professor of complementary medicine, Edzard Ernst. He learned chiropractic techniques himself and used them as a doctor. This is when he began to see the need for some critical evaluation. Among other projects, he examined the evidence from 70 trials exploring the benefits of chiropractic therapy in conditions unrelated to the back. He found no evidence to suggest that chiropractors could treat any such conditions.

But what about chiropractic in the context of treating back problems? Manipulating the spine can cure some problems, but results are mixed. To be fair, conventional approaches, such as physiotherapy, also struggle to treat back problems with any consistency. Nevertheless, conventional therapy is still preferable because of the serious dangers associated with chiropractic.

In 2001, a systematic review of five studies revealed that roughly half of all chiropractic patients experience temporary adverse effects, such as pain, numbness, stiffness, dizziness and headaches. These are relatively minor effects, but the frequency is very high, and this has to be weighed against the limited benefit offered by chiropractors.

More worryingly, the hallmark technique of the chiropractor, known as high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust, carries much more significant risks. This involves pushing joints beyond their natural range of motion by applying a short, sharp force. Although this is a safe procedure for most patients, others can suffer dislocations and fractures.

Worse still, manipulation of the neck can damage the vertebral arteries, which supply blood to the brain. So-called vertebral dissection can ultimately cut off the blood supply, which in turn can lead to a stroke and even death. Because there is usually a delay between the vertebral dissection and the blockage of blood to the brain, the link between chiropractic and strokes went unnoticed for many years. Recently, however, it has been possible to identify cases where spinal manipulation has certainly been the cause of vertebral dissection.

Laurie Mathiason was a 20-year-old Canadian waitress who visited a chiropractor 21 times between 1997 and 1998 to relieve her low-back pain. On her penultimate visit she complained of stiffness in her neck. That evening she began dropping plates at the restaurant, so she returned to the chiropractor. As the chiropractor manipulated her neck, Mathiason began to cry, her eyes started to roll, she foamed at the mouth and her body began to convulse. She was rushed to hospital, slipped into a coma and died three days later. At the inquest, the coroner declared: ‘Laurie died of a ruptured vertebral artery, which occurred in association with a chiropractic manipulation of the neck.’

This case is not unique. In Canada alone there have been several other women who have died after receiving chiropractic therapy, and Edzard Ernst has identified about 700 cases of serious complications among the medical literature. This should be a major concern for health officials, particularly as under-reporting will mean that the actual number of cases is much higher.

If spinal manipulation were a drug with such serious adverse effects and so little demonstrable benefit, then it would almost certainly have been taken off the market.