Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2122

Get into… Theatre

Oxford Imps
Email [email protected] to be added to the audition list

Performance value: 7
Friendliness: 4
Next big thing? 6

An improvised comedy troupe and one of the most famous of the Oxford theatre groups. But many would doubt their reputation as the most talented bunch of frustrated thesps in Oxford and argue that the imps’ egos are far larger than the laughs they get. If you are unfortunate enough to go to a less than amusing show, make sure you don’t talk to a performer about it, they’re sure to blame the audience rather than their own lack of talent…

Tabs Are For Flying
Email [email protected] with your year of graduation

Performance value: 4
Friendliness: 8
Next big thing? 1

Most of you have probably never heard of them, and judging bu the rather sub-standard “jokes” on their website, you might want to keep it that way. Taff is the organisation for all those wh are interested in getting involved behind the scenes in theatre-lighting, set design etc. There are bound to be some who are keen, but it seems to be all the work with none of the glory…

Onassis
To join our mailing list, email [email protected]

Performance value: 6
Friendliness: 7
Next big thing? 4

Committed to the performance of Greek drama, Onassis is a graduate programme which researches, funds, performs and preserves classical drama. An incredibly professional group who are regulars at the Edinburgh festival, but some may find them a little too serious for their liking…

Magdalen College Players
Email [email protected]

Performance value: 5
Friendliness: 7
Next big thing? 5

Probably the most active, and best known of the numerous college dramatic societies. Don’t think that just because it’s theatre on a college level it’s inferior to the likes of OUDS. Magdalen College Players are an active bunch who are keen to develop talent rather than just use their friends in each production (like some of the groups on this page). Opportunities to direct as well.

OU Light Entertainment Society
Email the president – [email protected]

Performance value: 9
Friendliness: 9
Next big thing? 1

A non-profit making drama society who are committed to providing entertainment for those who cannot travel to it. As the name suggests, there are no three hour long Greek tragedies here, but this recommends it to most. A light hearted dramatic society with more than their CVs on their minds. Join, indulge your inner thesp, and feel smug that you’re doing something worthwhile.

OU Classical Drama Society
Send your ideas to [email protected]

Performance value: 5
Friendliness: 7
Next big thing? 4

OUCDS is lesser known than its counterpart, OUDS, but this is not indication of the quality of its theatre. Originally established to promote the performance of classical plays in the original language and translation, it now supports several productions a year. If you’re a budding classicist thesp make sure you get involved; if not, don’t bother.

Oxford University Drama Society
Watch Romeo and Juliet, O’Reilly Theatre at Keble, Saturday 22nd November 8.30pm

Performance value: 7
Friendliness: 6
Next big thing? 8

Claiming to be the most vibrant student drama scene in England, OUDS is the umbrella organisation for Oxford drama and puts on over forty productions a term. Accolade aside, OUDS is terribly luvvie and more than just a little bit rah (if only in an ‘I left my Geordie vowels behind at 18, darling’ way). If you’re serious about acting, stay away from their committee and go for a lesser known production which doesn’t have their grubby paws all over it.

The Oxford Revue
Check out FEAR at OFS 20th-24th November

Performance value: 9
Friendliness: 9
Next big thing? 7

Almost the same idea as the Imps, but infinitely funnier and without the ego, the revue are a comedy group with more ambitious ideas than just improv. But don’t expect cutting edge experimental comedy; the imps know what they’re good at and they stick to it. The impressive list of alumni more or less speaks for itself…

Oxford Imps
Email [email protected] to be added to the audition list

Performance value 7
Friendliness4
Next big thing? 6

 

Welfare fears over Union ball penguins

Animal welfare charities have expressed disgust at the taunting of live penguins at the Oxford Union’s Fire and Ice Ball last Saturday.

Inebriated revellers at the Union’s Ball were seen by a number of guests to be hassling the birds, which had been brought in to provide entertainment and a photo opportunity.

However, Sharon Howe, representative of VERO, Voice for Ethical Research at Oxford, has criticised the actions of the drunk students, saying, “That sounds like a joke…I am very shocked. We are sickened by it as individuals, and as a group we would just like to say that the incident should be referred to the RSPCA.”

The RSPCA responded saying, “It certainly doesn’t sound ideal. Why do you need penguins at a ball? It seems completely unnecessary.”

The ball, which took place last Saturday, had a number of other attractions including live music, fire eaters and shisha.

A second-year from St Anne’s said “They kept live penguins in small cages. A lot of students were quite near the animals and they looked pretty terrified. Occasionally, they were hassled by drunk people.”

The Oxford Union has denied any maltreatment of the animals, saying, “At no time were the penguins allowed to be hassled and this was made clear to all those who wished to have their photograph taken with the penguins. The secretary regularly checked on the handlers and the penguins to see if they needed a break at any point and was informed each time by the handlers that the penguins were fine.

“The penguins were only present during the initial stages of the ball, leaving after a few hours. They were not kept in a cage but rather in their own pen which complied with ACTA guidelines and included a water pool for them to swim in as required.”

 

More racism rows

A racism row has erupted in another Oxford college this week, with the editors of the New College bogsheet forced to apologise for an allegedly anti-Semitic article.

This is the latest in a series of incidents around the University, with many students expressing concern that casual racism is now widely accepted.

Following on from the controversy surrounding the under 21’s rugby social last week, the New College JCR bogsheet, the Newt, has received several complaints from readers this week for being anti-Semitic in content.

The article, entitled “Jewish Economic Policy,” published in the last issue of The Newt has been permanently removed from the paper’s website having caused serious offence to many readers.

The article played on prejudiced stereotypes of Jews being miserly, giving ‘advice’ on how to save money in Oxford.

The editors in this apology confessed, “we entirely accept that its humour was both inappropriate and distasteful and was representative of a type of humour based on prejudiced stereotyping that should not be perpetuated.”

They continued that although the article was “intended to be satirical” it was “at the same time deeply offensive”.
Yet there are many students are still concerned, with one comment on the Newt website hoped that “Oxford actually responds to the fact that it has allowed a culture of casual racism and elitism to flourish and will respond extremely harshly to the author.

“It is clear that the University must send a very clear signal out that this is simply not acceptable.” Yet many are worried that it is specifically among University students that racist ‘banter’ is becoming a more accepted norm. OUSU’s Vice-President (Welfare and Equal Opportunities) Rosanna McBeath stated that “‘Banter’ which stereotypes and degrades any member of society is unacceptable and should not be tolerated.”

 

Oxford ‘failing’ foreign students

International students have criticised the University for failing to help them successfully integrate into life at Oxford, and have complained that their fees are unjustifiably high.

In a Cherwell survey of international students from colleges across the University, almost 50% of the respondents admitted to having difficulties integrating with fellow students at Oxford and agreed that not enough was being done to help them.

A member of the OUSU International Students’ Committee (ISC), said that he felt support from the University was ‘seriously lacking,’ adding that ‘international students in Oxford are barely acknowledged, let alone catered for. Fees are huge but there is no help financially, and there is a serious lack of transparency.’

Anuvrat Rao, an Economics and Management student at Mansfield, said that although his experience of Oxford had been positive, he felt let down by the university and his college who had not given him enough support. ‘As an international student, I don’t really see what the university do for us. I felt a bit left in the dark when I first arrived here. I wasn’t given any induction or information,’ he said.

International students form 14 per cent of full-time undergraduates and 63% of the graduate population at Oxford. According to statistics compiled by former lecturer and Senior Tutor at the London School of Economics Mike Reddin, Oxford is the third most expensive university for international student studies in the UK, with students facing fees of up to £17,800 for science-based courses, while those studying for MBAs are charged in the region of £35,000.

Respondents to Cherwell’s questionnaire complained about the ‘extortionate’ fees they faced, with 37% stating that they were unfair. Students argued in favour of more grants and scholarships for international students, and several said they felt their fees were merely used to subsidise national students’ tuition.

Co-chair of the ISC Angel Sarmiento agreed that the issue of fees was a ‘valid concern’, but pointed out that Oxford tuition fees were not out of proportion with other top universities around the world, such as Harvard, which charges around £22,600 a year.

A Queen’s College undergraduate said that the lack of financial aid from the University made other institutions more attractive: ‘Many colleges, including my own, don’t offer any scholarship or bursary for foreign students from developed countries. This makes the US, where financial aid is more available for international students, a more tempting destination, and indeed, many good international students are lured away from Oxbridge by top US institutions.’

Students have called on the University to do more to help promote integration, with suggestions including the creation of a ‘buddy’ system, assigning each international student a British student to help them settle in, as well as the organisation of more ‘mixer’ events and greater provision of college accommodation.

Over a quarter of survey respondents agreed that it was difficult for international students to befriend nationals and commented on the divide which exists between the two groups. A Wadham undergraduate commented, ‘You really have to be proactive in order to integrate, and even then it can be difficult’ and she suggested the organisation of socials where international students could meet nationals.

In response to the survey results, a Oxford University spokesperson indicated recent developments in provision for international students, including a ‘meet at greet’ service at Heathrow and the prioritisation of international scholarships in its fundraising campaign.

She said, ‘The University takes these issues seriously. We are not complacent and will continue with our efforts to improve opportunities for cultural integration further.’

 

Travel: South America

In South America it is common to hear back-packers refer to the ‘Gringo Trail’; the well-trodden routes that foreigners (‘gringos’) take through South America. You can easily tell when you are on the Gringo Trail by the availability of brownies and book exchanges, and the fact that the Israeli in the dorm bed next to you was on the same bus as you last week.

You realise you have strayed off the trail when you find that the town you are in isn’t endorsed by the Lonely Planet, the only transport out is once a day in the back of a truck, and cigarettes can be given to you as change.
Many gringos proudly boast of having ventured off the gringo trail, and I am guilty of this myself.

A New Zealander I met in Bolivia who had lived in the country for over 10 years looked at me with a mixture of horror and confusion when I informed him of my plans to get from Rurrenabaque, the main gateway to the Bolivian Amazon Basin, to Trinidad by bus instead of plane. “There’s nothing to see on the way” he told me, “and the roads are just dirt tracks through the jungle.” He was right and the journeys by minibus, bus, truck and motorbike were indeed the most uncomfortable of my life.

That said there is a reason why the gringo trail is so well-trodden. As exciting as it will later sound to your friends back home, it can be quite disturbing, to say the least, to be woken up on an overnight bus ride in the middle of nowhere by armed soldiers looking through your baggage with a search light. Not to mention that you might get quite hungry in off-trail parts of Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador unless you develop a taste for guinea pig or don’t mind eating plain rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

There are different types of gringo, but the most annoying type is the pretentious gringo. He won’t mind the guinea pig – in fact he’ll seek it out just to prove it to you. This is the gringo who would never call himself a gringo, he is the free spirit hippy traveller who speaks good Spanish, doesn’t use the Lonely Planet, and, like the locals, has a packet of coca leaves in his bag.

For many indigenous Andean people the coca leaf has an importance comparable with tea in the UK. Just imagine if US foreign policy was to bomb the PG Tips factories. Coca leaves are still used by the miners of Potosi, where the silver that financed the Spanish empire was produced. In the hellish conditions of the mines, coca leaves give a lift similar to coca cola and cocaine, two of the most famous products of the coca leaf.

For South Americans, coca leaves seem to be the solution to any ailments. My friend got an eye infection whilst doing the Inca Trail and our guide proceeded to pour coca leaf tea into her eye. It didn’t help.

The coca leaf is one of South America’s many ubiquitous symbols. Another is the alpaca, which can be seen, eaten and worn throughout Bolivia and Peru. Alpaca is the generic meat of any ‘Menu Del Dia’ and most gringos will be sporting alpaca jumpers and hats to go with their gringo pants (ridiculous and unflattering, striped trousers worn exclusively by gringos). This includes the pretentious gringo who will certainly continue to wear them at home in order to prompt questions about his adventurous travels.

Gringos also enjoy drinking local beers, such as the Cusquena of Cusco and Arequipena of Arequipa, and then purchasing t-shirts with the logos on. The most dominant symbol of South America is the image of Che Guevara. I even spotted Che Guevara cigarettes in Peru. A pilgrimage to the remote part of Bolivia where he was killed and buried is definitely one of the highlights of the trail.

A sharp contrast to the pretentious gringo is the gap year traveller. You will find this gringo in the Irish bar, where he has bumped into friends from school. Gap year gringos will begin their travels with the utmost caution, fearing all locals and hiding their passports in their underwear.

They will also stay in large ‘party hostels’, which organise dressing up and going out to clubs that play English music. It prepares them well for the next three years at university. The gap year gringo will also ensure that their trip is fully recorded on Facebook, so they can keep in touch with friends in South East Asia.

Life on and occasionally off the gringo trail has its ups and downs but ultimately nothing beats it. I substantiate this claim by reference to the countless gringos who have missed their return flight to remain on the trail indefinitely. I met one gringo who was still moving after 8 years on the trail.

It took a hard earned place at Oxford University to make me fly home from Buenos Aires having landed in Mexico City nearly 5 months previously. There is no point trying too hard to get off the gringo trail; it’s South America, not the Costa del Sol.

You can go to the continent’s most amazing attractions, for example Laguna de Quilotoa in Ecuador, a crater lake 4000m high in the Andes, and sit watching the sun rise without a single gringo in sight. Or Machu Pichu, which I trekked to for 4 days, finishing early enough on the 5th day to see the sun rise through the ancient sun gate and fall across the historic Inca ruins.

Also on the gringo trail is one of the highest lakes in the world, Lake Titicaca, where the water, the sky and the cloudy Andean mountains were all so blue that I sat for hours trying to take them all in. We haven’t even mentioned the Amazon, where you can fish for piranhas, swim with pink river dolphins and fall asleep to the noise of the howler monkeys.

Despite their annoying, boastful behaviour, it’s easy to see why gringos are as proud as they come. Finally, a word of warning, if you visit South America make sure you have a good reason to come home…and make sure you buy the t-shirt.  

 

Pepper spray attack at restaurant

Four students have been assaulted in a random pepper spray attack at a Chinese restaurant on Cowley Road.

Stunned students were hospitalised after two men, described by police as white youths, sprayed the party-goers at private karaoke party.

Three restaurant staff in Lan Kwai Fong restaurant were also assaulted after they tried to intervene in the incident at 10pm on Saturday.

A barmaid at the restaurant said, “we heard some noise in the karaoke room so our staff tried to stop the men.

“One of them was punching a customer. When we tried to stop them, they sprayed us with pepper spray.”

Restaurant owner David Chu was left shaken by the experience. He told the Oxford Mail, “we tried to stop them, but we couldn’t, because they were spraying us as well… one of my colleagues found it difficult to breathe.”

His staff were also left traumatized by the attack. Mr Chu added, “the girls were quite scared, they were in pain … they went to hospital, because the police didn’t know what kind of spray had been used.”

One passer-by described the aftermath of the incident.
She said, “there was a big group of Chinese people outside the restaurant. Some of them were clutching their eyes, and being questioned by police.”

Chu suspects that the attack might be racially motivated. He commented, “the people in the private function room were Oriental, so it might be racist. It’s just Chinese people here, so I can’t think of any other explanation.”

He also suggested that the attack may have been premeditated, “the two people who did this were prepared. People don’t carry pepper spray around with them normally”.

Thames Valley police have not ruled out racist motives. A spokesman described the attack as a “peculiar incident.” He stressed that the police were “keeping an open mind.” No one has yet been arrested in connection with the assault.

The restaurant has since introduced CCTV in the hope that this will deter future attackers.

 

Mumps cases in colleges

Oxford University is seeing an increase in the incidence of mumps. College doctors are believed to have diagnosed eleven cases in the last week, eight of which have been attributed to Oriel alone.

One Oriel student conmented, “It’s horrible. Everyone in my staircase is diseased.”

The viral illness can be spread through the saliva of an infected person. The Health Protection Agency offers oral fluid testing to confirm clinical diagnosis.

Whilst symptoms include a headache and fever one or two days before the swelling of the parotid glands, in some cases there are none.

 

Cherwell Star: Victoria Thwaites

In 1909, explorer, naturalist, philanthropist, soldier and art collector Robert Sterling Clark planned an epic voyage of 3700 miles across China’s northern regions. However, a combination of the murder of his interpreter, the slight distraction of the Boxer Rebellion and the constant potential for imminent robbery made the completion of this impossible.

Clark, an interesting fellow, went on to found an internationally significant art collection, (the Clark Art Institute near Boston) and breed racehorses, but his journey is recorded both in text and in photographs in ‘Through Shen-kan: the account of the Clark expedition in northern China 1908-9′.

And thus, in 2009, to celebrate the centennial of the Clark expedition, a troupe from the Oxford University Exploration Club set out to recreate the route, (thankfully with the aid of modern transportation). Victoria Thwaites, human scientist, redoubtable voyager and ‘medical officer’ was one of them seeking to emulate Clark’s mix of gung-ho and scientific observation.

“The journey itself, (no longer limited to pack mules and porters), was a fantastic experience”. Threading their way along the Yellow River and following the same route that Clark and his compatriots took, (deduced from photographs in his manuscript with the help of the Chinese guide companies in Shanghai), in a plethora of vehicles meant that Victoria and her fellow travelers saw a dimension of China that other tourists certainly missed; aided by having Robert Sterling Clark as a constant, slightly acerbic traveling companion.

“Traveling through China and the Tibetan hinterland in the midst of Olympic fever was also fascinating”, says Victoria, whose course of study allowed her to use the expedition as a means of observing China and its ethnic groups post-Cultural Revolution. These regions of northern China were far from the traditional tourist routes; the sight of a red-haired Westerner, or indeed any Caucasian, was enough to draw crowds of fascinated onlookers and multiple photographs.

However, despite warm welcomes into homes and the incredible friendliness of the people, there were periods of trial. “A particularly interesting moment was traveling through the ruins of an earthquake-shattered Chengdu on a crowded minibus, just before another tremor struck”, related Victoria in a typically relaxed fashion.

This is not the end for Victoria’s exploratory urge; “I’m planning on doing something properly adventurous next year; kayaking in the Himalayas seems like a pretty good idea”. What with Victoria plotting the conquering of the known world, it seems reassuring to know that Ranulph Fiennes has a nascent successor.

 

Interview: Vivien Duffield

Dame Vivien Duffield, arguably Britain’s leading philanthropist, is no stranger to the trials and tribulations of undergraduate life at Oxford. She herself began her degree in Modern and Medieval Languages at Lady Margaret Hall in 1963, when the presence of women in Oxford was still very much a novelty and 10 pm curfews were still very much enforced. Dame Vivien chuckles whilst reminiscing about her exploits playing backgammon into the early hours at Christchurch and then scaling the walls into LMH rather unsuccessfully, resulting in a broken arm, a 3 am hospital visit, and a very irate Jewish father (the entrepreneur Charles Clore who owned Selfridges).

Nevertheless, it is certainly fortunate for Oxford that Dame Vivien’s escapades left her intact to direct what she herself dubs ‘the campaign of campaigns’. This aims to deliver an almighty £1.25 billion to ‘sustain and enhance Oxford’, and to allow it to compete with the astronomical endowments of universities such as Harvard and Yale.

Launched in May, the campaign is backed by the Chancellor, Lord Patten of Barnes and Richard Dawkins among other notable alumni. With her characteristic chutzpah and impressive record there could be noone better suited for the job. ‘I’ve got one last big one in me,’ she says. ‘And this is the ultimate challenge. Oxford is everything rolled into one – it’s the British Library, it’s the National Gallery, it’s the Weizmann Institute. It’s got theatre.

It’s got everything. There is something for everybody.’ Her passion is infectious as she runs her fingers through her highlights in a theatrical way, becoming increasing vexed: ‘Why do middle-class English parents bleed themselves dry to send their children to private schools, and the moment they get to university, they won’t cough up?’ Without drawing a breath, she answers her own question: “It is this attitude we have that universities should be free. We have always taken them for granted. For a long time the colleges [at Oxford] didn’t even bother to raise money at all. It is a miracle that we have three or four universities among the world’s best. I don’t know how they do it.’ Refreshingly blunt, as always, she unabashedly proclaims: ‘I am a great elitist – for brains.’

Although of course committed to Oxford Dame Vivien has of course been engine behind a multiplicity of other noble causes, with tremendous success. She has been described my numerous people as ‘dangerous’ company, given her redoubtable reputation for conjuring money out of nowhere, and especially out of people’s own pockets. Her deep passion is, of course, opera, and she jokes that ‘Royal Opera House’ will be found engraved on her heart. It was she who was the driving force in the raising of around £100 million from private sources, most found within the pages of her own address book. Her money raising schemes included a gala performance of The Nutcracker in 1984 to raise money for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. “I had this mad idea of charging £5,000 for two tickets. It was a fortune. And we sold out, and raised £1m.’ Her major current project is the Clore Leadership Programme to train future leaders in arts management, which is helping to train the future generations of art leaders, inspired, she says, by the fact that ‘everything seemed to be being run by Antipodeans a few years ago.’

It is certainly not difficult to see why Dame Vivien achieves such remarkable results. What she lacks in stature she certainly makes up for in sheer force of personality. Whilst she may lament her age: ‘I’ve got a bus pass,’ her boundless energy and stamina are frankly alarming. With a plethora of charitable interests under her watch, a myriad of social engagements and five homes, she rarely spends more than two nights in a place. Even more important, she is a veritable social chameleon. Looking around her Chelsea flat the walls are festooned with images of the Dame. From the most glitzy gala event at the Royal Opera House, dripping in diamonds and discussing the last act of Onegin with Prince Charles, to interrogating Tessa Jowell about London’s bizarre 13 minute stint at the closing ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, to lunching with Mick Jagger in St Tropez; with each she is in her element.

At the drop of a hat she can turn on the most disarming of charm, with her deep smoky voice no doubt a devastating tool for schmoozing. However, when her patience is frustrated she readily admits to her consummate skill in ‘nagging and bullying.’ She certainly does not suffer fools glady: ‘England’s quite rich, but rich people here think everybody wants them for their opinions, not their money.’

Perhaps even more striking than Dame Vivien’s fabled ability to raise money is her even greater enthusiasm for giving it away. She has parted with an estimated £176 million from her various foundations and is still distributing $6 million a year. After putting £5.5 million of her own money into the reconstruction of the Royal Opera House she purchased Constable’s The Opening of Waterloo Bridge as a gift to the nation and given £2.5 million each to the Tate Modern and British Museum. To her the philanthropy is not a chore, rather, a pleasure. ‘I’m always saying how lucky I am that I can actually make people happy and do what one wants to do. Its part of Jewish ethics that one always looks after others.’

Nevertheless, on the subject of money, especially, she is refreshingly brusque. Emblazoned on a pillow behind her is the unabashed motto: ‘Better to be nouveau riche than no riche at all.’ Certainly, her advice on money is simple. ‘The only word of advice my father ever gave me was when I was 21 and they were letting women into Lloyd’s. He forbade me to join and said: ‘Never join anything you don’t understand. There is always someone cleverer than you.’

Perhaps the most striking feature about Dame Vivien is her total lack of self-righteousness, even given her own enormous personal generosity. Not once does she use the pious phrase ‘making a difference.’ All she does say, without a hint of sentimentality is: ‘It is the most wonderful gift in the world to be able to do things for other people.’ She repeats one of her favourite fundraising phrases: ‘Shrouds don’t have pockets.’ With this natural impresario at the helm, it certainly seems that Oxford’s future is in safe hands.

 

Radical harmony

When The Ordinary Boys sang about “Over the counter culture” in 2000, I don’t believe that they were referring to the emerging culture of self-medicating patients, thanks to pharmacies selling drugs without prescription. Nor do I believe that they were seriously trying “to be so different” with any sort of distinctive message: they were trying to launch a music career which, for a while, they managed well enough.

They also managed to reinsert the term “counter-culture” in to the mouths of teenyboppers and onto the airwaves of youth culture, where its absence had not been filled, and still isn’t, by the profusion of musicians trying to be “radical”. Music being radical politically is hardly a new idea, of course. In the 1930s Woody Guthrie carried a guitar with “This Machine Kills Fascists” inscribed on it and punk was born in the 70s as the first mass expression in fashion and music of social discontent and frustration. Yet artists with a political message have lost their voice in the intervening years, and where it has become cool to idolise Pete Docherty and for celebrities to take crack, it has become un-cool to care about the world, its problems and its politics. Once decorated with rips, zips, safety pins and slogans, artists and celebrity figures have moved from the counterculture and into the mainstream and being ‘radical’ now means something different.

John McClure, the preaching Reverend of indie rock band “Reverend and The Makers”, is (somewhat dramatically) “in love with the idea of it being cool to care about the world”. Whilst his Yorkshire accent delivers sharp and cynical lyrics on modern day society, he uses his regular presence in newspapers and interviews to continually question governmental policies and the silence of other British celebrities on serious issues when, given the influence of our celebrity estate, they have the voices that the public will listen to. He cites lad culture, anti-intellectualism and brand image as reasons for their gagged throats – yet I doubt whether he is truthfully causing a stir in any greater way than by proving that his depth of opinion is greater than his actual music.

His newspaper complaints against other celebrities and his urges for radicalism are unlikely to manifest in any real governmental questioning or cultural rebellion, and citing the celebrity endorsement of Barack Obama’s campaign as proof of their power is hardly ground-breaking when swinging a leg up onto the political bandwagon is as fashionable there as rehab and over-sized sunglasses. I do genuinely believe it to be a shame that more artists don’t express solid political affiliation in our country, but then again when our ‘celebrities’ include Kerry Katona and the ‘stars’ of Big Brother I don’t feel the loss quite so tragically. And indeed when some artists do make a show in their shows of “trying to be so different” (Preston’s words, not mine), their performances smack of being exactly that: performances, not sincerely felt political protests.

Entering handcuffed and in orange jumpsuits on to the stage at Reading this year, American rockers Rage Against the Machine (pictured above) screamed about Guantanamo and world leaders in between their swearwords, the noise being so great it was difficult to hear the words “recently reformed…first English show in eight years…”. Given that their rant against Tony Blair was over a year out of date and their abhorrence of Bush was hardly an original statement, they failed to provide the 70,000 synchronized moshers with anything seriously radical to headbang to.

Below the thud of the headbanging and McClure’s whines, some musicians’ notes ring out clear, to the tune of actually making a difference to instigate change in society. Can you ride a bike with no handlebars? The Flobots can. They can also show you how to do-si-do, how to scratch a record, and how to organise street teams across America to fight youth crime. Through their website “fightwithtools.com” the Denver sestet aim to prompt drastic social change in the regions visited by their street teams, with the ultimate goal of nationwide improvement. Their left-wing views are more accessible than extremist and they are currently focused on encouraging voters – naturally in favour of Obama – in the next US election, but simply because they are being drastically different from other musicians in actually having a social-improvement program they have become the radicals of an otherwise inert culture scene. One of their influences is Billy Bragg, the left-wing musician responsible for encouraging musicians to turn up the volume on their political voices by recording anti-BNP records and by becoming, like him, involved with schemes such as “Love Music Hate Racism”.

Set up in 2002 in response to the BNP’s election success and rising levels of racist crime, LMHR plays on from the success of the Rock Against Racism movement in the late 70s and 80s. They organise nationwide music events – club nights and outdoor festivals, small gigs and large concerts with big name acts with the specific goal of inspiring the crowd to become actively engaged in anti-racism and anti-fascism movements. Through LMHR, I found out the personal opinions of one their most ardent supporters and one of England’s most recognised female rappers, Miss Dynamite:

She got involved with LMHR to campaign against the “immoral and disgusting” BNP and to use “music, as one of the most powerful creative tools in life [to] take a stand”. She believes in freedom of speech – but only to an extent:

“people might not agree with what I’m saying but the difference is that I’m not saying I dislike someone because of the colour of their skin or their sexual preference. As a black woman I feel completely insulted that they [the BNP] are even allowed to exist.” The power that music holds means that it must be, she explains, “positive and expressive. There are lots of artists who’ve inspired me, the legends like Bob Marley and Marvin Gaye. I feel that the music of their era had many artists who were saying something, without them being seen as “conscious” as such.

Music seemed to mean something different through that whole era – like within Soul, people were going through the civil rights movement and that was expressed so much in the music. Only recently I was listening to an old tape my Dad made, and I realised that all these songs I never thought much about before, listening to them now they’re really socially conscious – I’m like ‘oh my god – is that what they meant?’ – they’re talking about racism, they’re talking about civil rights.” Yet like McClure she feels that today’s musicians are failing to speak out in their music for certain issues and campaigns. “I can’t understand”, she exclaims, “how if you feel passionately about things why you don’t say that in your songs. For me, its part of life, its how I feel.”

So, on the decibel scale of political music, it seems that some voices sing out louder than others, and when the political chord is struck, the note is heard. Yet the Flobots and the LMHR artists are the ones whose tunes are what matters, what make a difference. They don’t sing for their voices to be praised, they sing to make people sit up and listen and make a change. Because of that, they have been shifted to the left: they are the radicals, they are the counterculture.