Monday 30th June 2025
Blog Page 2167

World XI: Sean’s left-backs

0

As far as this writer is concerned it’s a fact that the three best left backs in the world all ply their trade on Her Majesty’s shores. No prizes for guessing the identity of the big three; Arsenal’s Gael Clichy, Chelsea’s Ashley Cole and Manchester United’s Patrice Evra. Unfortunately Andrea Dossena just misses out…

All of these three are blessed with all the attributes required of the left back; lightning pace, tireless running and, suprisingly for full backs with such attacking skills, admirable defensive qualities. No truly top class defender can just be a marauder (take note Jose Boswinga).

Witness Patrice Evra dominating a right winger with pace and superb timing of tackles. Watch Ashley Cole safely navigate a tricky low cross across his six yard box, completely aware of where the nearest striker is. Ask any Arsenal fan who their best defender is, they’ll point you straight towards the young Frenchman. In fact as defenders they are all rather equal; positionally astute, tenacious, and as mentioned before, ludicrously quick.

So instead it is in the area for which they are so often feted that I will turn to to split the trio. Here again they have a lot of similarities. All have used their pace and stamina to devastating effect and are frequently focal points of lightning attacks. But while their are many similarites, there are two attributes one man has rather more aptitude for than the others.

Considering his defensive strength, when it comes to left-backs with dribbling and crossing Patrice Evra has no equal. Cole and especially Clichy have rather quick feet, but both still look a little lost after skinning a man or two. Evra on the other hand has enough dazzling, and effective, tricks and flicks to put Ronaldo to shame. Not only that but once he’s embarrased that right back he can deliver devastating crosses – think of the delivery for United’s second goal against Chelsea earlier this month.It is here he truly edges ahead of the rest. Both Cole and Clichy, considering how left footed they are, do not have the same power and whip that Evra can provide.

The obvious choice he may be, but he’s the obvious choice for a reason. All three left backs are world-class, one is just more world-class than the others. Honestly, how on earth did Abidal ever end up as France’s left-back?

Sean’s World XI

  • GK – Iker Casillas – (Real Madrid and Spain)
  • LB – Patrice Evra (Manchester United and France)

 

 

Behind the Scenes: The Producer

0

Laura Hastings-Smith, producer of the award winning Hunger talks about the highs and lows of her job with film editor Rees Arnott-Davies


RAD: What is it that a Producer does?

LHS: It’s quite a difficult question to answer, because there are many different kinds of producers. There are producers who specialise in the finance side of the job, and so are great deal makers, there are other producers who are very good at  the development end, are particularly good with creatives, writers, caste and so on, then there are some producers who are more expert at working at the coal face, taking the production through from beginning to end – they’re often what’s called the lead producer – they’re there every day and it’s their job to make films happen. I think people get very confused between the role of the director and the producer, because obviously the director is the visionary creative lead, but what people don’t understand is that the producer actually has ultimate responsibility for the delivery of the film as it was written, and as it was understood to be made by the director. They have an overview and also a responsibility to keep everyone not only cast, crew and budget, but also the director on board with the vision that everyone has bought into.

RAD: So would you say it’s about organising the final product, and keeping it under control?

LHS: Producers need to be leaders; they always say the production is led from the top. You set a tone for the production, for how deals are made, for the straightforward flow of information. You need to take care of everyone, to show that you care, to make sure people are fed well, that people are treated with respect and are appreciated for what they’re doing.

 

‘Walking up the carpet at Cannes is obviously great, but that’s the icing on the cake, not the core job.’

 

RAD: Is there a typical day for a producer?

LHS: I’m not sure there is. There are so many different aspects to a production, from when you’re in development, to where you’re financing a film, to when you’re casting and crewing, to when you’re in full scale pre-production, to production, to the edit, to the post-edit and the delivery. And it doesn’t stop there, particularly if you’ve got a successful film, because you then have to think through the festivals, your PR campaign, the distributors, the international campaign, awards ceremonies, opening nights, premieres. It’s so multi-faceted; it’s really quite a job.

RAD: What’s the best thing about being a producer?

LHS: I think for me (and every producer would answer differently) it’s the creative side. I love that honeymoon phase in development and pre-production, when you’re still getting inside the head of the director. For me that’s absolutely key – to work at the coalface, to understand the director as a person, but also to understand their vision for the film, so that when things get tough, I can protect that vision. Walking up the carpet at Cannes is obviously great, but that’s the icing on the cake, not the core job.

RAD: What’s the worst thing about being a producer?

LHS: Personally, I hate doing contracts. Of course that’s a hugely important part of my job, but thankfully it doesn’t take up all my time. Obviously you will have days when you get a curveball, but once everything is up and running, you have more time, because you have all these heads of department who are doing their jobs, and if you’ve crewed and casted properly and you’ve budgeted and scheduled properly, it should all work without you being there. But of course, film is so complicated and there’s so much potential for things to go wrong, they will, and sometimes you get complete surprises, things you could never have foreseen, so my job is always looking ahead, scanning the horizon looking for where the next problem is going to come.

 

‘Producers need to be leaders; they always say the production is led from the top’

 

RAD: How did you first get into producing?

LHS: My root in is not typical in any way. I studied fine art painting at university but then switched to fine art filmmaking, and for a while after I graduated I taught. Then I did an M.A. in Film and Television studies while I was writing and developing my own projects, because I was a director. I made little films with regional arts money, and then bigger films, but my crossover into the mainstream was in documentary. So I was directing flagship TV documentaries for quite a few years, and became a producer-director, then series producer, then head of development at a company. But when I had my daughter, I finally thought I’d like to produce more than direct, and around that time I began working with Jefferson Hack and Rankin, who were the founders of Dazed and Confused magazine, and my first feature film was for Rankin – and Hunger is my second.

Shadow of Varsity inspires victory

0

The Blues dominated on their home court this Wednesday. Oxford levelled their season head-to-head against their opponents Nottingham 1st’s, and sent them packing with a heavy defeat to contemplate on the journey home.

With the all-important and all-consuming Varsity match fast approaching, the OUNC girls were buzzing with energy, feeding off the hype surrounding it. Having drawn against Cambridge last week, they were keen to increase their intensity in this week’s match and to string together a series of wins on their way towards the big encounter. The pressure will be especially intense this year, with high expectations after a three-year winning streak against their arch rivals. After having seen their star centre injured, however, and a strong showing from Cambridge seven days ago, the girls will have a tough task on their hand when they attempt to extend their present record.

From the outset, the Blues were all about fast feet, strong interceptions and setting up goal-scoring opportunities. Within the first minute, the new addition to the Blues, GS Rhian Price, previously a 2nd’s player, had scored, giving Oxford the lead.
Oxford demonstrated excellent movement of the ball across the court, sending sweeping passes from player to player. Failing to finish, however, saw the Nottingham defence snatch the ball away and provide their goal shooter with a chance to score. It was successfully taken, and evened the scoreline. The game continued to move rapidly from end to end, with each team creating chances for themselves. By the end of a frenetic first quarter, which showed the skills of both sides, Oxford had managed to create a 7-3 lead, which was principally down to their superior finishing ability, and good marking inside the D.
Following a positive pep-talk from Coach Sandra Du Plessis, Oxford came back on court with a fiery temperament. By combining speed and composure, they scored an immediate goal. Du Plessis’ inspiring talks would be a constant feature throughout the match, with the hotheaded coach often supplying the encouragement her players needed to find the extra gear.
Despite the rousing words from the sidelines, Oxford’s momentum began to stall midway through the game. The Blues lost concentration and allowed Nottingham to perform combative interceptions and force even more opportunities to shoot at goal. The tourists’ shooters seemed to be finding their range as well, which led to Nottingham beginning to make small inroads into the Oxford lead.

In a frantic few minutes of play, Oxford began to concede numerous goals. However an injury time-out came as a godsend, providing them the opportunity to regroup. Following some bullet passes, they eventually scoreed and ended the second quarter with a one-point lead at 12–11.
The second half of the match saw Oxford prove themselves as the stronger team, both in terms of physicality and fitness. A new impetus seemed to grip the entire team after the respite of half time. They scored goal after goal against a tiring Nottingham outfit, who remained somewhat stuck on 13. It was clearly an unlucky number for Nottingham, as their shooting became increasingly erratic.

On the other hand, Oxford coupled excellent defending with a very strong attack, putting their opponents under constant pressure and forcing them to make mistakes that Oxford could immediately capitalise on.
As time ticked away, Oxford did their best to hide their tiredness and pushed for every ball. A brilliant one-handed take down the centre by OUNC President Holly Woolven was connected to the statuesque 6’2 GS Venetia Barrett. Another goal was scored for Oxford, and the match ended with a sterling victory to the Blues at a scoreline of 30-17.

 

Coach Du Plessis was delighted at her team’s success, and emphasised the ‘brilliant decision making’ and ‘fighting spirit’ that enabled them to play to their full potential for three out of the four quarters. Having struggled with consistency in the second half of the season, this particular win for Oxford provided a much needed confidence boost. Captain Zillah Anderson underlined their ‘mental strength and good point construction’ as key to the match,and she confidently looks forward to a successful culmination to the season.

The Varsity match, the biggest of the year, looms ever closer on the horizon. It remains to be seen if the pressure of previous years will weigh too heavily on their shoulders or if Oxford will rise to the challenge

Oxford poetry post up for grabs

0

The position of Professor of Poetry, a position that has been held by W.H. Auden and Seamus Heaney, at Oxford University is to become vacant in May when current professor Christopher Ricks steps down at the end of his five year post.

The pay is relatively low but the position at Oxford does not require the poet to write about the Queen and Royal Family, as the Poet Laureate has to.
Andrew Motion is seen as one of the favourites for the job.

Cannabis den raided

0

Oxford police raided a property on Howard Street last Sunday, seizing one hundred cannabis plants.

A spokesman for the drugs unit of Oxfordshire Police Department, PC Leigh Thompson, has stated, “drugs are a huge priority for us and we will continue to crack down on those supplying and trading in them.”

No arrests have been made following the raid. Police are appealing to members of the public to come forward with information.

Ratings rise on countdown

0

Channel 4 has reported a rise in ratings following the appointment of ex-Oriel student Rachel Riley as Countdown’s new assistant presenter.

Riley joined Countdown on 17th January, as assistant to new host Jeff Stelling, of Sky Sports’ Soccer Saturday. Riley’s good looks are thought to have contributed to the rise in the show’s viewing figures by around 10,000 per episode, despite an early blunder writing a minus sign instead of a plus.

The Oxford graduate was chosen from more than 1000 applicants to replace maths whiz and long-time presenter, Carol Vorderman, after a pay-deal dispute triggered Vorderman’s resignation.

Boffins reveal chess gender gap

0

The champions of chess are mostly men, but this is not due to male ability. An Oxford University study has revealed that there are simply too few women in the game.

Men outnumber women by 16:1 in the German chess federation.

Merim Bilalic, a member of Oxford’s research team, stated that when 100 of the best men played the 100 of the best women, the men played slightly better. But 96% of the difference was due to more men playing chess overall.
There has not been a female world or British chess champion.

Different year, same prediction

0

Cuppers rugby has become one of the most predictable competitions in Oxford sport. The engravers charged with applying each winner’s name on the trophy are probably in danger of contracting repetitive strain injuries from carving the names of Teddy Hall and Keble so often. The fact that many of the top teams in the college leagues add to their squads with several Blues players, means that for many other teams competing, a quarter final place is a huge achievement, a good showing in the plate more realistic. While this may all sound very pessimistic, looking down the list of potential favourites for this year does little to suggest that we have any reason to change our expectations.

Keble, who have dominated the college scene on all fronts in the last few years, will, as usual, consider themselves the number one seed in 2009. Although they had a hiccup in losing to Pembroke last term, the additions of Blues stalwarts such as McKercher and Ackroyd should make them too strong a prospect for almost every other team. In all, they boast four players from the Blues squad, with other reinforcements coming from the Greyhounds and U-21s. They will also be especially eager to avenge last years defeat in the final to Teddy Hall, and are unlikely to make the same mistakes as they did last year, when they left out a number of their first choice players. After Magdalen’s loss this week, Keble have once again ascended to their perch on top of the league table, a position they are now used to occupying. As they continue to grow in confidence, it will take a huge effort to bring the college rugby giants to their knees this time around.

Last years winning finalist, and historically the most successful team in Cuppers, Teddy Hall, would be ecstatic if they were able to repeat last years victory. They would usually be the team who Keble would be most wary of going into the competition, but an indifferent year for the normally consistent Hall culminated last week in a thorough drubbing by Keble. Looking likely to finish fourth in the league this term, they will have to pull something very special out of the bag if they are to give themselves a chance of progressing to the final. Although they will welcome back a number of university players, this may not be enough to bridge the gap between themselves and those top teams who are currently exhibiting better form.
In fact, if form itself were the acid test for a teams likely performance in Cuppers, then you would have to point towards Magdalen and Pembroke as the other two teams with the most convincing claim to the crown. Pembroke have built on their double promotion last year to establish themselves as one of the top sides, and go into this last week having only lost to Magdalen. They pushed Keble hard in the semi-finals in 2008, and will be looking to go one better this time around.

However, they will be without talismanic back Tim Catling, with the Varsity Match hero currently out of the country. In fact, Pembroke will only be able to count on one player returning from Blues 1st team duties, which may not prove enough in a competition where the amount of Blues players turning out for their college side often proves the difference. Magdalen however, although only having lost one match before this week, to St. Anne’s St John’s, they were on the end of a thorough beating at the hands of Christ Church on Tuesday. Their inability to field a competent back-line for an important league game is an ominous sign, and they’ll hope the same thing doesn’t happen when they come up against better opposition.

Although, as is usually the case, the teams in the top division will dominate most peoples predictions for favourites, there are two teams outside the highest echelon of college rugby that will make for very interesting prospects. Univ have had a mixed season, and will need to put in a good performance this week to avoid relegation to the third division. However, their starting XV will most likely be unrecognisable next week, as they add to their squad will a whole raft of university players. Into their backs come Jon Burnett and Luke Fenwick from the Blues’ squad, whilst this years U-21s side contained no less than seven Univ players, many of them in the pack. Although no longer able to rely on the electric pace of Boto at outside centre, the strength throughout the team which they will experience in Cuppers will make them the dark horse of the competition and definitely one which the other teams will be looking over their shoulders for. Depending on the draw they receive, I’d predict them to reach the final.

Although Univ may be the most likely team outside Div 1 to launch an assault, as their Cuppers credentials have been proven in previous years, the most surprising contender for this years tournament should be Worcester. They will be something of an unknown quantity this time around, and anyone who has played them this season would find it astonishing that they are even being mentioned alongside the other teams in this article. They have been utterly woeful in the league this year, and face the ignominy of being relegated to the fourth division if they fail to get a result against New this Thursday. For a team that was playing its rugby in the second division at the beginning of the year, that would be a spectacular fall from grace.
However, if their league side are not quite up to scratch, the recruits which they should be getting in the next few weeks are of a slightly higher calibre. From the Blues squad they can expect to add four players to their pack. This would make a huge difference for any team, and will turn them into a formidable forward unit.

But it is the man who could be pulling on the number two jersey for them that will provoke most interest. It would be quite a sight to see Anton Oliver, capped 57 times by New Zealand, packing down against another College side. Most teams will be praying that they won’t have to face this prospect, and although their backs will probably not be strong enough for them to reach the semis, the damage which could be done in the early rounds could be quite dangerous.

I would advise any captain, if they found out they were playing a Worcester front row including Oliver and Dan Rosen, another hooker who has features in the Blues squad this year, to claim a lack of front row players and go straight to uncontested scrums. Not only would it stop embarrassment at set piece time, and isolate Worcester’s most potent weapon, but it may also avoid serious injury, especially for the rather less experienced front rows in college rugby.

But despite all this talk of upset and unlikely victors, it is probable, in this most consistent of tournaments, that the silverware hoarders of Keble will once again have their day. Although it would be nice for the engravers if they could have some variety in their work at this time of year, it looks like we’ll have to wait until next year. Let’s hope I’m proven wrong this time.

 

Review: Mankind

0

Georgia Sawyer’s Mankind is a modern adaption of a medieval morality play that, in its original context, was designed to instruct its audience in appropriate Christian behaviour. It is peopled with a wide variety of allegorical figures. The austere Mercy (Tom Bishop) offers Mankind (Matt Monaghan) the chance for redemption, while the forces of temptation, including the devil Titivillus (Eva Tausig), try to bring about his damnation.

While this would seem to suggest a strait-laced moral lecture, the theatrical experiance is almost manic in its variety and vivacity. The whole production is charged with intense passion for the subject matter and determination to bring it to life for a modern audience. When the evil creatures Newguise, Nowadays and Nought are on the stage, the action relies heavily on the simple, physical comedy of the pantomime and barely a moment passes without a bawdy double entendre, a suggestive pelvic thrust or a knowing wink.

Live music is constantly woven in and out of the play and is performed with aplomb. In line with their allegorical natures, each moves with a sense of deeper purpose: the devils low to the ground, Mankind uncertain yet sensitive, Titivillus langorous and sensual, and Mercy with his hands firmly clasped in prayer. The set and costume reflect the moral landscape through which the play moves. There is little ostentation through props and all the characters are dressed in black and distinguished only by their shoes. All of these confusing factors taken together add up to a deliciously various but slightly chaotic product.

The play is sign-posted as ‘high art’ through the doffing of costume in favour of black clothing yet seems to rely heavily on the ‘low art’ techniques of pantomime and burlesque. For me this juxtaposition felt interesting but I could equally see how it could infuriate someone with strict ideas of theatrical propriety. Mankind represents an authentic gesture towards a different sense of theatre, one where the lines between audience and actors are thin and often crossed, as the smoke filled atmosphere of the medieval tavern or the wagon of a band of travelling performers.