Friday 27th June 2025
Blog Page 2198

OUSU election: meet the candidates

0

Aiden Simpson, Somerville

Why should you be elected OUSU president?
Having been my JCR’s OUSU rep for a year I know how it works and its problems. I’ve recently become involved with Education Not for Sale and know about the wider anti-fees movement. I’ve also helped the Living Wage Campaign and campaigned against the abolition of the VP women position.

What relevant experience do you have?
Having been my JCR’s OUSU rep for a year I know how it works and its problems. I’ve recently become involved with Education Not for Sale and know about the wider anti-fees movement. I’ve also helped the Living Wage Campaign and campaigned against the abolition of the VP women position.

What would your main priority as president be?
My main priority would be that OUSU becomes more active in campaigning in Oxford and nationally. It is wrong to suggest OUSU shouldn’t concern itself with national campaigns such as against fees, or the contempt of many in the University towards access. I’d make sure these campaigns were taken seriously.

What is your position on top-up fees?
I support the abolition of fees and reintroduction of grants funded by taxing the rich. The current cap is arbitrary and merely a stepping stone towards unlimited fees, which the University wants. Those who fight merely to retain the current cap are likely to find they cannot even retain this.

What is your position on a central student venue?
In principle I support the idea of a Central Student Venue. However every year candidates promise this and every year they find that the funds just aren’t there. It is far more important that we focus on welfare and making OUSU the radical, campaigning student union it should be.

Stephen Baskerville, University

Why should you be elected OUSU president?
I have the approach and energy to get OUSU doing more for students on the important issues like quality of teaching, accommodation and welfare. I have the experience to do that in a way that makes common rooms stronger, develops student leadership and leads to change on a wider scale.

What relevant experience do you have?
As a JCR President I pioneered a new academic feedback system; negotiated a low rent deal at 3.5%; successfully lobbied for refurbishment of the bar; and established a bold new access scheme with college. I know how to achieve change at the college level and the support Common Rooms need.

What would your main priority as president be?
Winning change for students by building strong relationships with common room officers and ensuring they have the required skills. This means more training in how to negotiate rent, represent students, build budgets, and improve teaching. I will campaign for better student representation and a full reform of University disciplinary procedures.

What is your position on top-up fees?
Personally I am against raising the cap on fees. Higher Education funding should be fair and should recognise the shortfall in university funding of recent decades. We will consult students in order to get the best result from Government as it makes its decision on fees next year.

What is your position on a central student venue?
I am in favour of a central venue at the right price. This year’s OUSU team have prioritised it, and a group has been set up to investigate the options. The plan is to put these to Oxford students in a referendum, and I intend to implement what they choose.

John Maher, Keble

Why should you be elected OUSU president?
In a time where OUSU is undergoing comprehensive change, it needs a President that is not divisive; I am not a member of any student political party. Your Student Union should support you and make your life easier. I will deliver this for each and every student at this University.

What relevant experience do you have?
As JCR President I reinvigorated Keble students’ interest in their JCR, leading to increased turnout at meetings. I represented students to our Governing Body; I know how to negotiate with authority. I also revitalised and chaired OUSU’s Complaints Board; I can and will make OUSU more responsive to your concerns.

What would your main priority as president be?
Aside from top-up fees, I will ensure that students get a better rent deal. The current support given to Common Room officers is inadequate; I would launch OUSU’s rent campaign in Michaelmas and guarantee that OUSU provides them with the relevant information required to negotiate a fairer deal for students.

What is your position on top-up fees?
Fighting increased top-up fees will be my main priority. As an international student, I will leave Oxford with $120,000 debt; my mom mortgaged our house to send me here. The best part of England’s university system is that it does not exclude anyone; we must not allow this to change.

What is your position on a central student venue?
In principle I fully support a central student venue, which will restore pride in our Student Union and be a tangible symbol as to how OUSU is relevant to its students. In the meantime, OUSU should be expanding its relationship with Pulse and other societies to provide great nights out.

Luke Tryl, Magdalen

Why should you be elected OUSU president?
In too many ways this University fails us. Whether it’s the underfunding of the counselling service, the college academic lottery or the draconian attitude towards trashing. I believe I have the ability to take on the authorities. I’ve delivered University wide, fighting for students, which will always be my priority.

What relevant experience do you have?
I started attending OUSU council in my first term at Oxford as OUSU rep. As Union President I managed an organisation with a turnover of £900,000, almost three times the budget of OUSU. I worked for long term change: fighting for lower fees, expanding the access scheme and improving accountability.

What would your main priority as president be?
When I told someone I was running the first thing that they asked was: what does OUSU do? I’ll ensure that OUSU reaches out. The first steps are more referenda, ensuring that you’re heard, and greater accountability – giving you the power to sack us if we’re doing a bad job.

What is your position on top-up fees?
I’m opposed to any move which will make wealth rather than academic merit a criterion for Oxford admissions – I oppose any rise in student fees. I don’t want Oxford to become as inaccessible as US universities, making student life a struggle. I’ll lobby the University and government to stop it.

What is your position on a central student venue?
Great efforts have been made to improve clubbing this year. But three popular clubs are going to close costing 2,100 clubbing spaces – leading to longer queues and unsafe trips out of town. We should set aside profits from club nights and reinvest them in a permanent venue for students.

 

Bush’s last stand

0

President Bush is lying low these days. So low, in fact, that one might assume he has been whiling away his last months in office tossing balls for his terrier and choking on the occasional pretzel. And why not? With his name poison to any would-be politician’s campaign, America’s lame duck leader has had a lot of time to himself during the election.

But Bush & Co haven’t just been twiddling their thumbs. Never misunderestimate W: in its final weeks, the White House is hard at work dismantling many of the environmental protections still standing after eight years of all-out war. It’s scorched earth a la Bush.

Why the sudden flurry of activity? The current administration knows the deregulatory bacchanalia of the last eight years will end when Obama rolls up in January, so it’s rushing to pass out party favours to its industry guests before the Democratic killjoys arrive.

Now to the contents of the goodie bags. First up are attacks on two main environmental laws. Bush officials intend to weaken the Clean Air Act by loosening checks on industrial pollution while making it easier to place power plants next to national parks. Then there’s one for the polar bears: plans are afoot to gut the Endangered Species Act by removing scientific oversight and ignoring the impact of global warming on wildlife.

In fact, the only animal the current administration has displayed any affection for is the fox that guards the henhouse. Hence plans to let factory farms police the effluent they release into waterways and to hand over responsibility for sustainable fisheries to, you guessed it, the fishing industry!

And for those who think Obama will set all to right come Inauguration Day, your new slogan should be: No, he can’t. The old environmental regulations are no legislative Lazarus; once they’re gone, they’re gone and even Barack the Messiah won’t be able to resurrect them for at least a few years.

Bush certainly isn’t the first President to engage in a last-minute legislative cramming session. Near the end of his term, Bill Clinton tried to push through a number of environmentally-friendly initiatives. Clinton passed many of his laws too late, however, leading the incoming Republican staff free to suspend them.

Don’t count on the same mistake from Bush; George may have been a middling student at Yale, but he’s no slacker when it comes to his industry friends. The perpetual frat boy will be looking out for his business brotherhood until the party is over.

 

 

Men’s Volleyball

0

The start of the volleyball season has seen the Oxford men’s 1st team enjoy mixed success; getting the season off to an emphatic start with two convincing 3-0 wins against Brookes and Cranfield, then slipping to equally resounding defeats to Cambridge and Nottingham, 0-3 and 1-3 respectively.

The team’s shaky start to the season had made the game against Loughborough crucial if the team were to turn the season around. Loughborough on the other hand, currently second in the league, were looking to close the gap on Cambridge at the top. Thus both teams had much to gain from the match, making for a tantalising contest.

The Oxford team were coming into the game full of confidence on the back of a great performance at the weekend in the qualification tournament for the EVA student cup, which saw them win all four of their group stage matches and progress to the final tournament, to be held in February.

And so with confidence and determination the Oxford team stepped onto court to face the team currently ranked 2nd in both the BUSA league and the EVA student cup and clear favourites to win the game.

Both teams started the game with intensity and after some good all round play from both sides the scores were level at 7-7. As the set continued the standard of play remained high from both teams, though unfortunately for Oxford, Loughborough were able to carve out a lead, bringing the game to 24-19 in Loughborough’s favour.

Oxford salvaged 3 set points through some excellent serving from Bartek Redlicki before eventually losing the set 25-22. Despite having lost the first set the team still felt that the game was very much there for the taking. So with renewed vigour Oxford stepped out onto the court for the second set.

Carrying forward the momentum that they had begun to build up at the end of the first set, Oxford managed to force their way to an early 4 point lead at 8-4. This they managed to maintain throughout the set hanging on to win it 25-21.

Having clawed their way back into the game Oxford allowed themselves to relax a little going into the 3rd set. Loughborough on the other hand, vented their frustration at having lost the previous set by putting in a very strong defensive performance which paved the way for some excellent offensive play, particularly from hitters Dove and Winter.

Loughborough’s redoubled effort on the court showed as they dominated throughout much of the set eventually finding themselves with a comfortable lead of 9 points late in the game at 22-13. Again some great serving, this time from the other twin Jakub Redlicki, as well as some dogged defensive play saw Oxford pull the score back to 23-20. Unfortunately in the end they couldn’t keep up the pressure and slumped to defeat at 25-20.

Once again, however, the Oxford team refused to concede defeat and on the back of the late push in the 3rd set came out firing in the 4th. Darek Nehrebecki, the captain, led by example, hammering shot after shot past the Loughborough block, to which their back-court players had no answer. In what seemed like no time at all the Oxford team had stormed to a 13-6 lead.

The task appeared to be simple from this point onwards, however, when the Loughborough setter, Tsui, came up to serve he was able to put the already struggling Oxford Libero, Andy White, under pressure by serving ruthlessly and consistently short. As White failed to come up with a solution, Loughborough managed to turn the game around, bringing the score to 19-16 in their favour.

The frustration of the Oxford team was evident and it looked for a moment as though they might throw it all away but they dug deep and were able at last to find their rhythm again, managing to finish strongly closing out the set 25-22.

So after four epic sets, which had seen both teams dominate periods of the game, it had come down to a fifth and final set. This time the set would be shorter, first to 15 only. Oxford knew that they would have to come out firing on all cylinders to have a chance. Loughborough’s hunger to win was equally evident as both teams came out in the final set giving their all.

Unfortunately for Oxford, Loughborough’s hitters were back at their best for the start of the set and Loughborough we able to carve out a 7-3 lead. Oxford pushed hard in an attempt to close the gap but could not manage to do so. After having come so far and come achingly close, the Oxford team fell to a 15-9 defeat in the final set of an extremely hard fought match.

Despite the obvious disappointment at having lost such a hard fought and crucial game it is not all doom and gloom for the Oxford team. The season is just getting started with opportunities for revenge.

There is the student cup in February, as well as the BUSA championships, giving the team the opportunity to prove their credentials as one of the top teams in student volleyball. All this is not to mention the Varsity match, which will be held next term, and promises to be a great event.

Final score: Blues 2, Loughborough 3

 

When winning isn’t everything

0

On Tuesday night, an Arsenal side with an average age of just 18.6 gave a footballing master-class to an all-but-Emile Heskey strength Wigan side. The game was won 3-0 and could have been easily more, were it not for the heroics of goalkeeper Chris Kirkland. The passing football was sumptuous, the first touch, pace and sheer audacity just breathtaking; a joy to behold for Arsenal fans and neutrals alike. The subsequent press is full of drooling eulogies far longer than this one, declaring this to be the perfect exhibition of ‘The Beautiful Game’.

Beautiful indeed and few, if any, of the reactions to Tuesday’s game were overstated or unjustified. Yet is beauty alone really sufficient? This particular game resulted in victory, but the club as a whole are trophy-less since 2005. Arsenal, and their pioneering manger Arsene Wenger, have been accused countless times of trying to be too pretty, of being unable to match class with consistency, rave reviews with results. The question is, gorgeous as such football proposed by Arsenal often is, is it worth it at the expense of success?

Too often, sides that strive for the ultimate footballing purity are out-done by those favouring pragmatism. One of the greatest victims of such a clash is the Dutch World Cup side of 1974. This side was the ultimate exponent of ‘Total Football’, a philosophy demanding extreme technique, fluidity and talent. Led by the magnificent Johann Cruyff, the Dutch obliterated Argentina, East Germany and Brazil on their way to a final date with the efficient behemoth that was the West Germany side. Typically, the efficiency outdid the excellence, and despite a magnificent Dutch opening goal the Germans showed their steel to win the game 2-1. The Dutch went home with the plaudits, but it was the Germans that took the prize.

Indeed, what is the purpose of playing sport, especially professional sport, if not to win? Ask any Chelsea fan if they would take back Mourinho’s years of pragmatic dominance to be where Arsenal are now, the response is likely to be incredulous. In fact forget the fans, midfielder Michael Essien himself said this week, “Everybody likes to watch beautiful football, but to play beautiful football without points is… I don’t think it’s worth it. Arsenal is one of those teams that just plays beautiful football, but at the end of the day they don’t get the points that they want to”

Crucially sport is about results, results gained by any means necessary. Just look at the record of Italy and Germany; four and three world cup victories respectively, with each won with brutal efficiency, matching clinical finishing with watertight defending. Much as it pains me, I would rather have been one of the delighted Italians partying through the night after victory in 2006 than a dejected Brazilian contemplating a journey home halfway round the globe after a weak quarter final exit. Nothing, not even the most seductive of pretty football, beats the thrill of victory.

Yet in all sports the best praise, the highest platforms of greatness, are reserved for those that can deliver both. Nothing is more satisfying, nor more enjoyable than watching the outrageously talented perform to their optimum. What better than Brazil at their show-boating best, the All Blacks flowing at full speed, or Roger Federer stroking another ball into the far corner? It is here that sport can be so exciting, so thrilling, that its memories live on far past the original game and propel themselves into folklore.

Sure, Liverpool’s recent victory over Chelsea will be rightly regarded as a tactical masterpiece, but it’s that and nothing more. It ticks one box, and so while it might well be crucial in this year’s title race it’s hardly going to be remembered. Yet put one of those classic sides together, the type that mix superb football with great results, and that’s when they can guarantee a place in the record books: think Arsenal’s ‘invincibles’ in 2004, the treble winning Man United side in 1999. Those are the sort of teams which will really be remembered as great; and not just by their own fans. Win dirty, and a side will always be treated begrudgingly; win beautifully and everyone from the fans, to the press, to your own worst enemies will be singing your praises from the rooftops.

The sort of greatness we are here referring to is that achieved consistently over time. Take Gascoigne, or even George Best. These are the individual reflection of what Arsenal seem to have been in the last couple of years. Nearly great, but not quite; have the potential but choke short of success. No amount of audacious flicks and tricks can match up to those which really make the grade. Think Pele, think Maradona, think Zidane. These are the individuals which mix the game at its best with the ability to produce it when it matters time after time.

Still, why bother eh? What are the chances of being able to be both brilliant and brutal? Well, slim maybe but by no means impossible, especially for those at the peak of their sport. Every sportsman wants to go down in history for being both brilliant and successful, and as long as the two can feasibly be achieved side by side I would commend anyone who aims so high. Little in sport gives such satisfaction as victory, but victory in style, victory deserved, feels all the better.

Every time the new set of Wenger’s young starlets emerges, the praise hits the roof. This side they say is his best youth crop yet, and few who watched Tuesday night’s game will argue otherwise. Yet the Beautiful Game is only worth it if it brings beautiful results. Half-baked flair is as pointless as the term suggests. Every single sports fan loves beauty in the game, can sit for hours watching the greats do their stuff, but it must be fulfilled. There is no way that this author would recommend its abandonment, that’s not what sport is about. Yet as far as Arsenal are concerned it’s time to start delivering, or be consigned to the scrap pile of history along with all those who manage either beauty or success, but not both.

 

Persistent New outlast Oriel

0

ORIEL – 0
NEW – 3

New College grabbed an important away victory against a flagging Oriel side, thanks to a perfect blend of persistence and patience. Oriel fought hard throughout, but could not match some decent play with goals, while New, having struggled to create through much of the game, scored three late goals to continue their excellent start of the season.

The highly physical encounter could well have gone either way, with both teams struggling to create the final ball until late on. It was in fact Oriel who dominated the opening exchanges, getting out of the traps first and looking to test goalkeeper Alex Khosla at any opportunity.

Their first big chance came inside the first ten minutes, when a well delivered free kick just outside the area was headed onto the bar by skipper Jonty Warner. Oriel looked to have possession under control and a flowing passing game, yet lacked any kind of killer ball to supply strikers Webb and Hoare with ammunition, which eventually proved to be the story of the game for the side floundering at the wrong end of the table.

Yet New College were not prepared to lose their grip at the top without a fight, and a few big challenges soon turned the heat up. Howell, a constant thorn in the side of the Oriel defence, began popping up left right and centre, looking to latch onto any through-balls carved out by the New midfield, although they were merely frustrated by the strong Oriel offside trap as the first half was played out to a pacy finish.

In the Oriel camp, Warner’s instructions were clear: keeping the ball on the ground in good conditions would lead to solid chances, whereas the tried and tested method of long-balls to Webb would not. He soon got his wish when the midfield began working the ball around the pitch at a steady rhythm, with little reply from New. Harry Hoare pulled his markers wide and opened up gaps and chances which gave American ‘keeper Sam Evans something to think about. However, it’s a mystery where his mind disappeared to in the 70th minute, when two incredibly weak goal kicks gave Gibbon and then Hoare clear cut chances to put Oriel ahead, which were ultimately wasted.

This stroke of luck seemed to spur league leaders New into action and almost instantly they replied with the breakthrough. Scrappy play by the Oriel defence left Robin Cantwell to sweep the loose ball just ahead of Howell, who caressed the ball past the onrushing Khosla with the deftest of finishes on 75. It had been a frustrating wait for the goal, and, as if at a bus stop, two more soon followed. Captains Painton and Warner had marshalled their teams well in an aggressive game, yet ultimately one had to prevail. Painton was released down the left wing and slid in a tantalising cross that was diverted into the Oriel goal by leader Warner himself. Although Oriel had worked tirelessly all game, heads dropped and the third goal was straightforward. A late corner just wasn’t dealt with, allowing Tommy Stadlen to open his account for the college from 5 yards out.

Despite Hoare hitting the bar with a volley that could – and perhaps should – have been put in the back of the net, the crushed yet unfortunate Oriel side had a sloppy end to the game, the scoreline of which somewhat flattered New. The game proved to be a lesson in converting chances when on top, and New showed why their ability to do just that has seen them storm to the top of the table approaching the halfway point in the season.

 

Women’s Lightweight Rowing

0

New College grabbed an important away victory against a flagging Oriel side, thanks to a perfect blend of persistence and patience. Oriel fought hard throughout, but could not match some decent play with goals, while New, having struggled to create through much of the game, scored three late goals to continue their excellent start of the season.

The highly physical encounter could well have gone either way, with both teams struggling to create the final ball until late on. It was in fact Oriel who dominated the opening exchanges, getting out of the traps first and looking to test goalkeeper Alex Khosla at any opportunity.

Their first big chance came inside the first ten minutes, when a well delivered free kick just outside the area was headed onto the bar by skipper Jonty Warner. Oriel looked to have possession under control and a flowing passing game, yet lacked any kind of killer ball to supply strikers Webb and Hoare with ammunition, which eventually proved to be the story of the game for the side floundering at the wrong end of the table.

Yet New College were not prepared to lose their grip at the top without a fight, and a few big challenges soon turned the heat up. Howell, a constant thorn in the side of the Oriel defence, began popping up left right and centre, looking to latch onto any through-balls carved out by the New midfield, although they were merely frustrated by the strong Oriel offside trap as the first half was played out to a pacy finish.

In the Oriel camp, Warner’s instructions were clear: keeping the ball on the ground in good conditions would lead to solid chances, whereas the tried and tested method of long-balls to Webb would not. He soon got his wish when the midfield began working the ball around the pitch at a steady rhythm, with little reply from New. Harry Hoare pulled his markers wide and opened up gaps and chances which gave American ‘keeper Sam Evans something to think about. However, it’s a mystery where his mind disappeared to in the 70th minute, when two incredibly weak goal kicks gave Gibbon and then Hoare clear cut chances to put Oriel ahead, which were ultimately wasted.

This stroke of luck seemed to spur league leaders New into action and almost instantly they replied with the breakthrough. Scrappy play by the Oriel defence left Robin Cantwell to sweep the loose ball just ahead of Howell, who caressed the ball past the onrushing Khosla with the deftest of finishes on 75. It had been a frustrating wait for the goal, and, as if at a bus stop, two more soon followed. Captains Painton and Warner had marshalled their teams well in an aggressive game, yet ultimately one had to prevail. Painton was released down the left wing and slid in a tantalising cross that was diverted into the Oriel goal by leader Warner himself. Although Oriel had worked tirelessly all game, heads dropped and the third goal was straightforward. A late corner just wasn’t dealt with, allowing Tommy Stadlen to open his account for the college from 5 yards out.

Despite Hoare hitting the bar with a volley that could – and perhaps should – have been put in the back of the net, the crushed yet unfortunate Oriel side had a sloppy end to the game, the scoreline of which somewhat flattered New. The game proved to be a lesson in converting chances when on top, and New showed why their ability to do just that has seen them storm to the top of the table approaching the halfway point in the season.

 

Blues Rugby League

0

With the first month out of the way, it’s clear that changes are afoot at OURLFC this season. A massive recruitment effort at the end of trinity has lead to unprecedented interest in the club. Record numbers at early season training have meant that the dream of becoming a two team club has been realised for the first time in OURLFC’s history.

Although there have been challenges that go along with running an extra team, the benefits make it clear that “The Maroons” are here to stay. On the pitch they won their first two games against Warwick University 2nds and Brunel University. The Maroons came down to earth with a bump in week 3 however, losing 60-30 at home to local rivals Oxford Brookes, who are now runaway league leaders. Despite this, a number of players have performed excellently for the Maroons with Jacob Turner’s exceptional defence being a highlight.

The Blues, having stepped up to the BUCS Premier South division, have competed well. Pre-season friendlies against Oxford Brookes and Oxford Cavaliers were keenly contested, with the Blues beating their university rivals before falling to the Cavaliers in the annual Jacques Scott Memorial Match. In BUCS, a challenging first game, against an experienced Nottingham University side, proved too much for many of the club’s new players as the Blues went down 52 points to 12. Although clearly beaten, it has to be said that the game was more competitive than the score line suggested. The team bounced back in week 2 with a strong 42-24 win against Northampton University and, although at times disjointed, it was clear that the side were starting to come together.

Week 3 saw the Blues travelling away to UWIC for the first time since the club’s last stint in the Premier division back in 2003. Despite losing in the last minute, the Blues were the better side for large sections of the game, and were unlucky with a few refereeing decisions. The club will now be hoping to bounce back from a disappointing performance against Loughborough last week when they play Exeter this Wednesday.

Throughout the month some very strong individual performances, particularly from Pete Forster and Phil Satterthwaite, and with a number of key personnel, particularly Blues captain George Smibert, set to return the club’s strength can only improve. With tough fixtures ahead it’s clear that this will continue to be a challenging term for OURLFC.

 

Blasphemy: the Life of Ivan Denisovich

0

Out to be a reactionary bigot? Hey, you should, like, seriously read this book. It’s by this guy who, like, totally lived in a Gulag for loads of years and stuff, it really reminds you of, like, how fortunate we are here in our cushy western culture where everything is cuddles and blowjobs, know what I mean? Hey, do you want to go and get, like, mega lashed at Thirst Lodge later? Ethan’s bringing a wrap he bought off that Slovak in Bonn Square.

If somebody says this to you, by all means go out and have fun, but for God’s sake ignore the literary suggestion; they’re most likely suggesting a novel by an author who, when he finally made it to the west, was probably disappointed by how moderate the Holocaust turned out to be. He’s dead now, so I’m pretty sure I can get away with saying that without a lawsuit in my pigeonhole. I doubt anybody is even reading this anyway, you’re all probably too busy tagging photos of yourself vomiting in tramps’ sleeping bags and drawing knobs on babies’ armpits.

And that’s the wonderful irony of this book. While stuck behind the Iron Curtain, Solzhenitsyn was hailed as a literary freedom fighter, the shocking voice of dissent amidst the stifling totalitarianism of the Soviet Union; he was even given a Nobel Prize for his inexhaustible ‘love of humanity’, and yet when he finally emerged an exile in 1974, everybody suddenly found out that he was, shock horror, a nationalist bigot who thought modern music was too loud and young people too soft. He’s basically Alf Garnett from Till Death Do Us Part, but without any self-restraint.

Frankly, he deserved to be in the Gulag, and if you don’t agree me, you deserve to be in there with him.
But back to the book. The unremitting dreariness of the Gulag is, of course, affecting, and at times you cannot help but feel deeply moved by the sheer comic horror of prison life. However, one still gets the sense that the real message behind this novel is not that the Gulag is the problem, just that the wrong people are in it.

 

Eyes on the Prize

0

It seems that this year’s judges made a conscious attempt to avoid some of the usual tabloid furore surrounding the Turner Prize. The shortlist definitely doesn’t contain anything that will invite controversy as easily as the works of Martin Creed or Mark Wallinger. If this year’s prize makes many headlines at all, it will be if Mark Leckey, who is the bookmakers’ favourites and the only male nominee, wins the award. further fuelling the claims that Turner juries are biased against female artists.

I’m of the opinion that Leckey shouldn’t win. Most of the attention his nominated works have garnered has been focused on ‘Cinema in the Round’, a video of a lecture on contemporary art delivered by Leckey in evening dress.

The piece seems to sum up what is wrong with the rest of the nominees’ oeuvre. Leckey rambles around a huge amount of subjects, from James Cameron to Karl Marx, creating a sense that he is nothing but a sponge, into which a century of culture has been absorbed.

Ever since the Cubists first pasted newspaper clippings onto their paintings, the idea that an artist need not always comment on popular culture has become popular, especially when (s)he has the option of directly including actual, physical manifestations of it in his works. Yet the Cubists, or Duchamp with his ready-mades, or Tracey Emin with her bed, seized artefacts from the world around them and transformed them into new works of art. Leckey suggests it is enough to talk about popular culture within the frame of a video, playing on a screen in an art gallery. Leckey is an astonishing cultural archivist, and probably a horrific bore at parties, but nothing more.

Similar criticisms can be levelled at Cathy Wilkes. Her assemblages are made up of the debris of modern living, and represent a side of contemporary existence that Leckey does not seek to involve himself with. Wilkes’ installation is unconcerned with aesthetics – it is downright ugly. Yet though she does make something new from her toilets, naked mannequins, birdcages and leftover food, it is impossible to tell what that is, or what it means. Maybe this is the whole point; the apparently random and chaotic nature of the artefacts represents a lack of communication. Yet this lazy argument illustrates Wilkes’ failings – more arresting and eloquent attempts have been made to illustrate a breakdown in communication.

Runa Islam’s films seem workmanlike rather than inspired, interesting rather than enrapturing. Given time and attention, their full significance and beauty could come to reveal itself but their immediate impact is limited. There’s nothing wrong with Islam’s work, but I like my art to be visceral as well as cerebral.

Goshka Macuga fulfils both of these criteria. Like the works of Leckey and Wilkes, her art is pervaded by cultural ephemera, but she has focus. Macuga’s cultural detritus comes in the form of letters and manifestos written by the members of Unit One, the 1930s Modernist group.

Where Wilkes uses random slices of the world around her and Leckey attempts to work with an entire cultural history, Macuga chooses to work with a tiny piece of forgotten history, dredged up from the Tate’s archives. She has taken sheaves of paper that contain hermetically sealed nuggets of the past and, in her free-ranging, mixed-media responses, brought them back into the world, alive and gloriously real. For this, she ought to win.

Blues Tennis

0

You all train hard, as with all the blues squads. How rigorous is tennis training in a typical week?

Obviously with the Oxford schedule court time is an issue that there is not much getting around. We train twice for good two-hour sessions during the week with a bucs match every Wednesday, and Saturday fixtures against many prestigious tennis clubs. In Trinity in preparation for varsity training increases to most days (as long as the English weather does not have other plans.)

How is the season shaping up so far for the blues?

It’s going well. In Michaelmas it’s all about the bucs league and we are currently 4th in the top division of the country. This is no mean feat as the other five teams in our league are full on tennis academies.

I would imagine it’s tough to get team spirit going at points, what would you say?

Team spirit is easy when you’re winning, but sure, when the losses start rolling in it gets tough. Tennis is very much in the mind, and I feel as a team we’re pretty mentally tough and so this, as well as Park end on a Wednesday, create a strong team spirit.

Have any great freshers stepped up to the team?

We have one fresher in the squad this year, John Groom. He is stepping up to the plate very nicely and has won his last three singles against some very good players so it bodes well.

Do you personally think the use of graduates at the pinnacle of Oxford sport is unfair on aspiring undergraduates looking to push into the top teams?

I personally do not know what an “easy degree,” at Oxford involves or even if it exists. If they do exist then there is an argument. However as a sportsman you want to be the best even if you have more academic hours (again I don’t know if this is true). It should just inspire you to work harder and act as motivation.

Lastly, how do you fancy your varsity chances?

Varsity is a unique competition. It is a pressure cauldron that suits some but not others, and momentum can be won or lost in a couple of points. It’s impossible to call definitively. However, as a sportsman you must back yourself, which is exactly what we will do when the time comes.