LMH second year Charlie Holt has won the race for the title of President of the Oxford Union, following Friday’s election. He will commence his duties in Hilary Term 2009.

Leo-Marcus Wan was elected Librarian for Michaelmas 2008.

 The full results of the elections are as follows:

President, Hilary 2009

Charlie Holt: 767
Ed Waldegrave: 574

Librarian, Hilary 2009

Leo Marcus Wan: 665
Guagua Bo: 620
Spoilt, blank, void: 175

Secretary, Michaelmas 2008

Tom Hartley: 712
Simon Millar: 429
Spoilt, blank, void: 322

Treasurer, Hilary 2009

James Langham, unopposed

Standing Commitee, Michaelmas 2008

Nouri Verghese: 153

Ronald Collinson: 137

Ngu Atanga: 133

James Kingston: 114

Niall Gallagher: 113 

Runner up: Katy Minshall 

Secretary’s Committee, Michaelmas 2008
William Parry: 109

Judd Fischer: 88

Justine Potts: 85

Laura Winwood: 71

Sam Cullen: 68

Fenella Corrick: 68

Julius Hugelschofer: 67    

Han Yu: 64

Emily Gardner: 53

Runner up: JD Appleby 

Police issued fines to over 50 cyclists who jumped red traffic lights in central Oxford on Friday.

The operation, which took place at the junction of Broad Street and Parks Road, formed part of a road safety campaign.

Two plain clothes officers situated outside the junction between Broad Street and Parks Road radioed descriptions of cyclists who ignored red lights to uniform officers further down the road, who pulled them over.

The cyclists, the majority of whom are students, were issued £30 fines and given advice on road safety.

In Trinity Term last year, nearly 200 cyclists were fined in two operations at the same junction.

PC Stephen Higa said that police were not trying to victimise students.

“The main reason is safety. If a cycle were to go through a red light, the consequences are potentially catastrophic.”

However, the experience was too much to handle for some.

One female student, who was stopped for passing an amber light, broke down in tears after she was pulled over.

She was not fined as she did not pass a red light. Officers had only wanted to offer her safety advice.

A student who has just finished his course at Oxford Brookes was among those who received fines. He said that the police should “use more discretion”.

He continued, “A verbal warning would have been appreciated. I’ve got shit all money at the moment.”

PC Higa said that there were further operations planned this month on Queen Street and Cornmarket.

Cyclists were issued £30 fines as part of a police operation at the junction of Parks Road and Broad Street.  More soon.

The nominee for Oxford’s next Vice-Chancellor has been named as Professor Andrew Hamilton, the current Provost of Yale University.

Hamilton will become the 296th Vice-Chancellor when John Hood ends his five-year tenure in October 2009, if Congregation approves the decision made by the Nominating Committee.

He described the decision as “humbling” and “inspiring”.

Dons have suggested that there will be little opposition to the nomination and have largely welcomed the decision to back someone from an academic background – a departure from Hood’s nomination as a candidate with business credentials.

Hamilton is Benjamin Silliman Professor of Chemistry and Professor of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry at Yale, in addition to his role as Provost. He has been recognised internationally for his academic achievements.

Nicholas Bamforth, a member of the University’s Council, said, “It is good to have a distinguished academic nominated for this post.”

A senior member of the University also approved the choice to opt for such a prominent academic. “I very much welcome the fact that Professor Hamilton is a distinguished academic as well as a successful University administrator,” he said.

However another professor has criticised the decision to ignore Oxford’s own candidates and again appoint a V-C from outside the University. He said, “He is clearly a man of ability in terms of academic stature, which is very different to Hood, but he has no connection with Oxford and this is quite clearly undesirable.”

He also claimed that the Nominating Committee, which is chaired by the Oxford Chancellor Lord Patten, was “determined to exclude” candidates from the University’s own academic body and to appoint an “outsider”. He claimed this marked a “continued and gratuitous support for Hood.”

He added that the nomination had been used for the ends of “internal politics”, with the consequence of ignoring candidates from within the University.

Despite this criticism the academic admitted that Congregation was unlikely to seriously challenge Hamilton’s appointment and that any likely opposition would be “small”.

Dons are now looking to the challenges Hamilton would face during his tenure and have suggested a number of key tasks he must tackle in order to lead the University to its future.

A senior academic said the new V-C would need to smooth over rifts between dons that have recently occurred. “His main task will be to heal the divisions on ‘Hoodism’ and ‘anti-Hoodism’ that has risen in the last few years,” he said.

Another member of the University expressed hope that Hamilton could adapt to the Oxford system and go ahead with reforms to the University.

“He comes here from North America where, unlike Oxford, the senior academic officers of universities are appointed rather than elected by their colleagues.

But he will surely have done his research by the time he arrives, and have understood that the most successful Vice-Chancellors have recognised that Oxford is much more like a partnership than like a business corporation, and have conducted themselves as ”primus inter pares” (first among equals) rather than Chief Executives.

“I hope he takes an open-minded look at Oxford and works with his colleagues to make the reforms that are urgently needed to increase the quality and value-for-money of the services provided by the administration,” he said.

Hamilton has been Provost of Yale since 2004 in which time he has lead a number of developments, including the acquisition of a new a 136-acre research campus.

Professor Hamilton announced the nomination in an email to colleagues at Yale on Tuesday. “I am enormously honoured and excited at the prospect of helping steward one of the great centres of scholarship in the world,” he wrote.

Hamilton is held in particularly high regard at Yale where both students and academics say he will be greatly missed.

The President of Yale, Richard Levin, said, “Andy Hamilton has led major initiatives to strengthen Yale in science, engineering, and medicine while at the same time enthusiastically supporting investments in the humanities, social sciences, and the arts. He is a first-rate scholar, who is respected by his faculty colleagues as a wise academic leader.”

A comment on the website of Yale’s student newspaper, Yale Daily News, described Hamilton as “A great guy and a fantastic provost” and added, “Yale will certainly miss him.”

The Chancellor of Oxford University, Lord Patten of Barnes, who chaired the Nominating Committee, said, “Andrew Hamilton’s remarkable combination of proven academic leadership and outstanding scholarly achievement makes him an exceptional choice to help guide us into the second decade of the twenty-first century.”

He added, “This is a particularly exciting time for Oxford and in Professor Hamilton we have someone with the experience and talent to help us take advantage of these opportunities.”

The current Vice-Chancellor, Dr John Hood, said, “I am delighted that Professor Hamilton has been nominated as the next Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, from Autumn 2009. I look forward very much to assisting him in any way I can to prepare for his new role.

“For my own part, I shall remain fully committed over the next sixteen months to the University it is my privilege to serve,” he added.

The Bod is to hold a ‘book amnesty’ next week to recover books inadvertently removed from reading rooms.

Students will be able to return books that they have taken from the Bodleian’s non-issuing libraries without incurring a penalty.

The amnesty will happen prior to the installation of new book detection systems at the entrance to the Upper Camera and Lower Camera reading rooms.

Most other libraries in Oxford have electronic tags that cause alarms to go off at the entrance if a person has taken a book out with them.

Vanessa Corrick, the Deputy Head of Reader Services for the Bodleian Library said, “An approximate figure for the number of open shelf books which go missing is 90 in the calendar year 2007.

“It is difficult to be precise about this figure since quite a few books are found when we do an annual check of the open shelf books during the Long Vacation i.e. they have been incorrectly shelved, or have even fallen down behind other books.”

She added, “This is a fairly small figure, although of course we don’t even like one book to go missing.”

English student Julie Jackson commented, “I have never taken any books, I usually photocopy the articles I need, but I can see why people would be tempted to take them.

The security is poor, especially in the Rad Cam, and when people have deadlines to meet all it would take is someone to run out of money on their photocopy card and because it is easy people take the books they need.

“The security is good for only letting in students, you have to show your Bod card but for taking out books, the person on the door asks you to open your bag and can’t possibly recognise every Bodleian book.”

Jackson said, “I know people who have taken books and have just said to the security that they were from another library.”

Corrick also emphasised that students who do return the books will not be recorded or penalised in anyway; “[…] we are not taking notes of who returns material. We would be grateful to have books returned whatever their state as our conservation staff may be able to carry out repairs.”

For those who are struggling to tell whether a book in their possession is from the Bodleian libraries, Corrick said, “There should be a stamp with ‘Bodleian’ on it on books, most likely on the reverse of the title page.”

The latest college accounts, obtained by OUSU under the Freedom of Information Act, show that spending on teaching and staff increased significantly in 2007.

Yet the University remains riven by financial inequality, with huge endowments allowing some colleges to supplement their income, giving them a major advantage over poorer institutions.

The accounts reveal that colleges spent £244 million in 2007, with over half going on staff costs. Their combined incomes totalled almost £8 million more than this, meaning that overall the colleges made a slight profit on 2006.

Over £125 million was spent on staff, a rise of over 7% since last year. Yet as colleges look to raise money from tourism, conference facilities and fund-raising, spending on academics is lower than that for other staff, such as caterers, managers and IT experts.

Overall, colleges have capitalised on hiring out their premises as conference facilities during vacations, making over £24 million.

Poorer, newer colleges with more modern rooms have been keen to take advantage of this new source of income, with St Anne’s and St Catherine’s making around £1.6 million a year.

Hertford and Keble do almost as well from conference income, but Christ Church makes the most, receiving almost £2 million.

Christ Church has also been the only college to make a significant amount of money from tourism, making around £800,000. No other college except Magdalen has be able to make more than a six figure sum for admission charges.

Christ Church and New have also tapped in to another lucrative form of income not available to other colleges, together making £3 million from their choir schools.

The biggest division between the colleges continues to be the size of their endowments. Most colleges take in around £2-5million in interest per year, some of the biggest earners being Magdalen, Jesus and Christ Church.

Tracts of agricultural land puts St Johns in a league of its own, bringing in £6 million a year on top of £5 million from financial assets. All Souls is funded almost entirely by endowment income, as it receives nothing from tuition fees.

While historic Oxford colleges are worth hundreds of millions of pounds, they are one of the biggest drains on college finances.

Almost £6 million was spent on maintaining premises in 2007, while tending gardens cost just over £2 million. Wear and tear of buildings means that their value depreciates over time, at an estimated cost of nearly £12 million last year.

Almost every pub in central Oxford has banned trashed students, while one pub is even refusing to serve anyone wearing a gown, as part of a new Pubwatch initiative.

The decision is aimed at reducing both the cost of cleaning up after trashing, and the disruption caused to residents.

Darren Kent, the chair of Pubwatch and landlord of the Turf, described the initiative which involves pub managers across the city.

He said, “together with the Proctors, we’ve decided to clamp down on trashing.”

“All [tourists] can see is flour and disgustingness…[students] have no reason to go as far as they do” he added.

Kent said that the proctors’ treatment of trashing had been hampered by stretched resources and “they asked us to help them with the clampdown.”

A recent email from the Proctors condemned food abuse and noted, “two people broke limbs last year by slipping on flour wet from champagne and eggs, including a woman who skidded and crashed on her bicycle in New College Lane.”

Other pub managers have supported the move. The manager of the Wheatsheaf said, “we don’t want people coming in covered in baked beans and cat food and getting it all over our furniture.”

The landlord of the Bear Inn added that his staff had to spend up to two hours jet-hosing down areas of the pub.

The King’s Arms has gone even further, banning any student with gowns and balloons from entering around exam time.

The manager of the King’s Arms denied that the measure was extreme. He said, “it’s a precaution against their [students’] behaviour.”

Students have reacted angrily to the new initiative, though they insist it will not deter trashings.

One student, who recently trashed a friend with a water pistol full of mayonnaise, cast doubt on the stringency of the Pubwatch ban.

“I got into the Turf covered in flour and I got egged in the Turf. They’re not going to turn away ten people just because one of them is covered in flour,” he said.

The student also denied that there was much evidence of a major clampdown by proctors. He said, “I’d be fairly deterred from [trashing] outside exam schools,” but claimed he managed to egg a friend undetected on High Street.

Students have also reported that exam locations further from the centre have “no proctor presence.”

A spokesperson for the Oxford emphasised that this was an initiative by pubs, not the University, but added, “the University is supportive of this.”

Nightsafe, which coordinates an initiative to reduce violence in Oxford, endorsed the move by Pubwatch.

The manager of Nightsafe said that Oxford is a “tourist town” and “[the tourists] don’t want to sit in flour and eggs.”

VIDEO: Finalists get trashed

Video by Rachel Fraser