Wednesday 11th February 2026
Blog Page 3

Sheldonian Series panel discusses the power and limits of activism

0

A panel discussion on activism took place at the Sheldonian Theatre last Wednesday as part of the University of Oxford’s Sheldonian Series, prompting debate on the effectiveness, ethics, and democratic role of activism.

The event, titled ‘The Power of Activism’, formed part of the series’ Hilary term focus on the theme of ‘Power’ and was moderated by Dr Julius Grower, Associate Professor of Law at Oxford. Panellists included Shermar Pryce, the Oxford University Student Union (OUSU) President (Communities and Common Rooms); Professor Federica Genovese, Professor of Political Science and International Relations; Munira Mirza, Chief Executive of Civic Future; and climate justice activist Dominique Palmer. Baroness Shami Chakrabarti CBE contributed via pre-recorded remarks.

Opening the evening, Vice-Chancellor Professor Irene Tracey said: “In our world, there is no shortage of issues to be passionate about”, emphasising the relevance of activism in contemporary political life.

The first audience question asked panellists to provide examples of where activism had been successful. Pryce referred to the work of Fair Share during the COVID-19 pandemic, while Genovese highlighted global fossil fuel divestment, stating that “16,000 institutions” had stopped investing in fossil fuels, resulting in losses of “about $40 trillion”. Palmer cited the Stop Rosebank campaign, while Mirza pointed to recent farmers’ protests, including demonstrations in Oxford.

Discussion then turned to examples of activism perceived as unsuccessful. Pryce cited the 2003 Stop the War protests against the Iraq War, arguing that they failed because they did not “change the incentives of institutions”. Palmer questioned whether failure in activism could be clearly defined, while Mirza reflected on her early involvement in activism and argued that some forms of disruptive climate activism risk alienating the public. Genovese added that measuring success is difficult because it is often unclear which outcomes most people want.

Baroness Chakrabarti offered a broad definition of activism as “any form of political expression”, while noting that the term can sometimes carry negative connotations. Mirza stressed that activism is not always progressive or left-wing, citing the British National Party as an example, and argued that it is important to distinguish between activism grounded in persuasion and activism grounded in coercion.

An audience question later raised whether disruptive protests could be justified, citing farmers’ demonstrations. Mirza responded that such protests had been organised and permitted by the police, while Pryce noted that movements such as the suffragettes were also criticised in their time. 

Genovese shifted the discussion to activism in democratic versus non-democratic contexts, arguing that “democracies work best with incremental changes” and citing Brexit as an example of a rapid political shift that democratic systems struggled to absorb.

Toward the end of the event, an audience member interrupted to ask why Palestine Action had not been discussed, particularly in light of its designation as a terrorist organisation. The moderator stated that the question would be returned to later; however, although two further audience questions were taken, the issue was not subsequently addressed by the panellists.

Despite this, the University described the event as “a stimulating evening of discussion” with an engaged audience. Dr Grower described the panel as “a brilliant demonstration of what Oxford does best”, emphasising the role of universities in facilitating debate on contentious issues.

The Sheldonian Series is open to the public and aims to promote freedom of speech and inclusive inquiry. The final event of the academic year, focusing on the ‘Power of Satire’, will take place in Trinity term.

Oxford Cultural Leaders programme celebrates 10th anniversary

0

The tenth anniversary course of the Oxford Cultural Leaders programme, a leadership coaching service operated by the University of Oxford’s Gardens, Libraries & Museums (GLAM) division, in partnership with Saïd Business School, concluded in late January. During its ten years, the internationally acclaimed leadership programme has coached more than 250 senior figures in the arts, museums and heritage sectors across the world.

This year’s anniversary course drew together 24 leaders from cultural organisations in Oxfordshire for the first time after a competitive application process. During its six days, it combined workshops, discussions, reflective exercises and case study based learning. Drawing on expertise from the Saïd Business School and the University’s cultural institutions, to support participants to develop confidence in their leadership and strengthen their strategic thinking.

This Oxfordshire programme focused on applying this framework to local pressures affecting cultural organisations in the county. Amongst the participants, half were selected from GLAM and the remaining came from organisations such as the Story Museum, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Opera, Justice in Motion, the Bodleian Libraries, and Oxford Playhouse. 

The aim of the programme, Alex Amey, OCL’s Administration & Marketing Officer told Cherwell, was to: “help to strengthen the leadership within the county’s cultural sector and create a network of professionals to identify shared issues within the county.”

The final day featured a ‘Mythodrama’ workshop, hosted at the Oxford Playhouse. It used Shakespeare’s Henry V as a cultural medium to explore leadership archetypes and approaches to emotional intelligence.

Abigail Brown, arts officer at Vale of White Horse and South Oxfordshire District Councils, said: “[It] has been an inspiring and affirming experience. The course content was thoughtful and led by inspirational experts, and the connections made across Oxford’s cultural community were genuinely heart-warming and uplifting.”

Professor Christopher Morton, acting director of the Pitt Rivers Museum, stated: “The insights gained and connections made will continue to inform my work well beyond the programme.”

Environment Agency allocates over £8 million contract to clear illegal Kidlington waste dump

0

The UK’s Environment Agency (EA) has awarded an £8 million contract to Yorkshire firm Acumen Waste to clear an over 20,000 tonne waste pile in Kidlington, citing pressing concerns over fire safety. 

The waste pile, located in between the River Cherwell and the A34, is one of at least 517 illegal dumps across England, which police say are run by organised gangs, offering landfill services at much cheaper rates than legitimate operators. The waste was dumped on multiple occasions between June and October last year. Three men have been arrested in relation to the incident, on suspicion of both environmental and money-laundering offences.

The cost of the clean-up has concerned local communities, with the residents of the constituency of Bicester and Woodstock submitting a petition to Parliament declaring the economic burden should not be met through council tax. 

A spokesperson for the EA told Cherwell: “The Environment Agency believes those responsible for dumping waste should pay for its clearance. We took the exceptional decision to begin removal after advice from Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service about the possibility of a fire on the site that could have a widespread effect on the community, including closing the A34, raising air quality issues from smoke, and interrupting electrical supplies.”

 Its national environmental crime unit has said the agency would look to recoup the clearance costs via the Proceeds of Crime Act from anyone successfully prosecuted in the investigation.

The EA’s direct involvement in this case is unusual, as it is not legally responsible for clearing illegal waste. However, the spokesperson told Cherwell: “While the Environment Agency continues to support the principle that the criminals responsible should cover the cost of clearance, it retains the power to act in wholly exceptional circumstances.” 

Mary Creagh, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, explained that “the scale of this fire risk presents an overriding public imperative”. However, the EA spokesperson told Cherwell that “a potential start date towards the end of February is looking unlikely now” due to site and weather conditions.

The 140 meter long and 6 meter high mound, located on a floodplain, poses various environmental risks to residents of north Oxfordshire and beyond. The pile is composed of processed domestic waste, shredded plastics, polystyrene, tyres and other household items. In their petition to Parliament, local residents noted that rising river levels could lead to contaminated waste entering the river and surrounding soil.

The EA has taken steps to mitigate the risk of waste entering the River Cherwell, installing barriers around the site and monitoring water quality. These efforts have found no indication of pollution entering the Cherwell so far due to the waste. The agency has also removed several damaged trees in order to access the site, promising to plant two trees for every one cut down.

Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds has said that the government is committed to eradicating these types of environmental crimes by increasing funds to tackle waste crime, hiring more officers, and introducing tougher penalties for offenders.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Under-Secretary at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) has also pledged greater government efforts in prevention and disruption, particularly through the introduction of digital waste tracking to help fight waste crime. Speaking in the House of Lords,  Hayman said: “It is important to say quite clearly that the government do not believe that the status quo is working.” 

Acumen Waste were approached for comment.

University overhauls undergraduate admissions examination requirements for 2027 entry

0

The University of Oxford has announced that it will discontinue Oxford-specific admissions examinations for the 2027 entry cycle. 

Instead, Oxford admissions exams will now be administered by University Admissions Test UK (UAT-UK), a not-for-profit organisation formed as a joint venture between Imperial College London and the University of Cambridge. According to the UAT-UK, the University will use its admissions tests for “at least the next three years”.

Under the new system, UAT-UK admissions examinations will be required for 16 of the University’s undergraduate courses, with admission examination requirements removed for the remaining courses.

Regarding the change, a University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Oxford’s undergraduate admissions process is rigorous and designed to identify academic potential. The University is continually reviewing its admissions processes and practices to ensure they best meet the needs of the University, schools, and applicants. Our approach varies according to subject and considers a range of information as evidence of a candidate’s ability to thrive here.” 

The spokesperson added that the change “will streamline the admissions process for schools and our applicants, allowing candidates to take one test that is accepted by a number of other UK universities”. Seven UK universities currently utilise UAT-UK’s examinations, including the London School of Economics, the University of Cambridge, and Imperial College London. 

Admissions tests were negatively impacted by technical difficulties in 2024. Students taking the History Admissions Test (HAT) experienced a two-hour delay. In the 2024-25 academic year, the University proposed to stop subsidising admissions test fees. In May last year, Conference of Common Rooms (CCR), the representative body of Oxford SU, passed a motion criticising the proposal on the basis that it might “exacerbate college disparities and disincentivise open offers”. 

In the 2026-entry admissions cycle, a variety of discipline-specific exams, such as the Ancient History and Classical Archaeology Admissions Test (AHCAAT) or the Mathematics Admissions Test (MAT), were booked through the Oxford Admissions Test Registration Portal and assessed at a Pearson VUE testing site. 

While UAT-UK examinations will also be delivered through Pearson VUE, a private admissions testing service, UAT-UK currently offers three of its own examinations: the Engineering and Science Admissions Test (ESAT), Test of Academic Reasoning for Admissions (TARA), and the Test for Mathematics for University Admissions (TMUA). 

The admission examination for medicine will continue to use Pearson’s University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT), and the law examination will continue to use Pearson’s National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT).

The mysterious posters in Oxford, and the novel behind them

0

It was the third time I’d walked past the Rad Cam noticeboard before I finally stopped. I had assumed it was just another poster, lost in the usual blur of student plays, society termcards, and talks promising free pizza. But this one was oddly specific. It advertised a Hamlet performance staged in 2011 at a venue called “The Echo Chamber”. The font was formal, the layout carefully designed – it all felt familiar enough to pass at a glance. Yet at the bottom were the elaborate crests of “Creech College” and the “University of Kingswell”. Neither of them rang a bell.

A few days later I spotted another at the Old Bod, wedged between notices about library rules and history databases. This time it advertised a conference on “The Air Battle of Pearl Harbor at 70: New Archival Discoveries,” held in 2011 at “Casaubon College” – part of the University of Kingswell. A quick Google search confirmed that none of these places existed.

The same week, I found myself staring at one of the large plywood boards along Catte Street, trying to make sense of it. It announced – in serifed capitals with a Latin feel – “A classical ritual in the Greco-Roman tradition celebrating the late Sir Francis Bowell, holder of the Mould Chair of Greek at the College of Casaubon” in 2011. A coda specified: “The ceremony will include a sacrifice and libations.”

Intrigued, I began asking around – had anyone else seen the Kingswell posters? At first, no one had. Yet once my friends noticed one, they seemed to appear everywhere. All of the posters had something else in common: a QR code printed at the bottom, leading to a sparse Linktree page. It contained neither names nor explanations, simply a downloadable PDF titled Dust on Marble.

It turned out to contain the opening chapters of an anonymous satirical novel set in 2011 in an Oxford-like university town, complete with exaggerated traditions, obscure societies, and a narrator with a sharp eye for class divides and academic absurdities. The writing was surprisingly polished – more deliberate than one would expect from a casual student prank – which only added to the peculiarity.

The website offered the option to subscribe to a newsletter. Expecting little more than a confirmation email, I signed up. Over the following weeks, I received short messages with cryptic updates about the project, such as “Oscar Wilde has acquired the cockerel. Wigs are encouraged in the evening”. They were signed by the “Sovereign Sesquipedalian Fissiparous Order of Saint Gwinnodock of Bethlehem, of Sparta, and of Atlantis”.

At first I assumed it must be a group of students, perhaps an art project or an elaborate in-joke, but the longer it went on, the less certain I became. There were no society references, no Instagram accounts, and no familiar names circulating. It all felt less like a prank and more like a carefully constructed world that had quietly appeared in the middle of Oxford. The more I read, the more the posters began to feel like part of the story itself – the fictional colleges and libation ritual featured in the novel, as though the city had been folded into the fiction.

One morning, I woke up to a subscription email mentioning that a “reading” of the latest chapter was taking place “all day” at “Vaclav Havel’s bench” in Uni Parks. It wasn’t framed as an event – there was no specific time and no invitation to meet anyone. Yet the location was real. It was an art installation devoted to the memory of the Czech human rights advocate, easily found on Google Maps.

When I decided that curiosity was more important than deadlines and went to investigate, I wasn’t sure what to expect. Online images suggested a small, round table built around a tree, flanked by a couple of elaborate chairs. It felt strangely natural to find about a dozen carefully designed booklets lying in a neat pile. Their shiny covers resembled marble, and the title was printed as if formed from dark, scattered dust. On the second page, a sentence read: “This edition is limited to 250 numbered copies.”

I sat down and skimmed through the new chapters, enjoying the rare sunshine. It turned out I was not the only one intrigued. During the hour or so that I spent there, three students showed up who were following the same trail. Two had also seen the posters, and one had received a printed copy in an anonymous envelope left in their pigeonhole, with no further message. We briefly talked about our puzzlement, each of us quietly wondering whether any of the others might be the author.

No newsletter updates followed until a digital version of the new chapters was sent on Christmas Eve. Since then, emails have fallen silent, and the posters have been removed. To my knowledge, only two plywood boards remain, both on Catte Street – one by the University Church and one by the Old Bod. 

If the goal was notoriety, the attempt has failed. The only result returned by Google is a puzzled Oxfess post from October. But part of what makes the whole episode so alluring is how naturally it fits into Oxford life. This is a city that thrives on stories – on whispered traditions, obscure societies, and half-true legends passed down between generations of students. From secret dining clubs to elaborate pranks that become part of college lore, Oxford has long blurred the line between institutional seriousness and playful myth-making.

The Kingswell posters felt like a modern extension of that tradition. They didn’t announce themselves as art or performance. They simply existed – quietly strange, half-believable, and left for students to interpret. In a university defined by names, titles, and achievements, the idea of a creator choosing to remain invisible feels almost rebellious. The mystery becomes part of the work itself. It also speaks to a certain hunger for novelty within the routines of academic life. Between lectures, essays, and problem sets, it’s easy for days to blur into one another. The sudden appearance of something unexplained offers a small disruption, a moment of intrigue in an otherwise predictable landscape.

The content of Dust on Marble mirrors this fascination with hidden worlds. Its exaggerated societies, ceremonial rituals, and obsessive hierarchies feel like satirical versions of the very myths Oxford students joke about. 

Sometimes I have to go through the photos I took of the posters, or touch the booklet, just to reassure myself it wasn’t all a feverish dream. When clarity returns, I am left wondering whether this mystery exists only for the present moment – asking nothing of its audience except fleeting curiosity – or whether it is part of something more intricate, with a hidden purpose still to be revealed. Only time will tell.

Musical theatre and classic literature: A marriage of two minds?

Sometimes, great works of art emerge from surprising sources. Consider the celebrated teen rom-com Ten Things I Hate About You (1999), loosely based on Shakespeare’s 1590 play The Taming of the Shrew. While Katherina’s transformation into smart-mouthed American teenager Kat Stratford may read to literary purists as a ‘dumbing-down’ of the original source material, the film is memorable and packs a punch with its larger-than-life characters and unlikely love story, claiming a cultural legacy of the sort similarly enjoyed by Shakespeare’s play itself. 

From the initial inspiration to its creation, art’s journey to conception is often no less predictable than the artwork itself. Nowhere is this clearer than in the exuberant and diverse world of musical theatre, which seems an art form uniquely able to set almost anything to song and dance. The writing of a musical, as with the creation of all art, calls for the spark of inspiration, for which the kindling has often been found in classic literature. Take, for example, the recent sensation of The Great Gatsby, based upon F. Scott Fitzgerald’s famous 1925 tragic novel of the same name, which has dazzled audiences both in London and New York. What, therefore, are the ingredients for a perfect literary-to-musical adaptation? In considering two of my favourite musicals, let’s chart how speech becomes script, how characters become embodied, and how emotion becomes song.

Les Misérables: An on-stage revolution  

I’ll never forget the feeling of seeing Les Mis on the West End for the first time on my twelfth birthday; before this point my exposure to musicals had consisted solely of frequently re-watching the films The Sound of Music, West Side Story, and Annie. The first stirring notes of the ‘Prologue/Look Down’ were captivating, and ‘One Day More’ was a personal moment of musical rapture at the end of Act I. 

First performed in 1985, it has become one of the most beloved and well-known musicals globally. Based upon Victor Hugo’s 1862 novel, it follows French peasant Jean Valjean’s efforts to reinvent his life after 19 years in prison, set against the backdrop of the 1832 Paris Uprising. Hugo’s novel is a long, complex, and interwoven book, yet I was struck by its vivid use of characterisation. Indeed, this complexity of plot, language, and syntax is why it is such great source material to translate into song. The novel’s strong emotions and characterisation, when set to music, are distilled into a spectacle that not only has something to say, but the power to be emotionally moving.

The tension at the heart of Les Mis is Inspector Javert’s fanatical obsession with hunting down Valjean. It’s this very tension that allows Les Mis to work so well both on the page and in song. It provides an energy that pulls the narrative onwards while building momentum within it, creating scope for character development and emotional exploration, until we reach the climactic finale. Condensing a two-thousand-page long 19th-century French novel into a three-hour musical is an impressive feat, yet the richness of Hugo’s original text would offer ample inspiration to any artist. 

Spring Awakening: From 1890s Germany to Broadway 

Perhaps it’s ironic that Spring Awakening, a musical which I’ve never actually seen, is among the musicals closest to my heart. While I have only ever experienced the show through a mixture of grainy early-2000s YouTube clips and the Spotify recording of the original Broadway cast, its diverse range of moving songs have stayed with me ever since. Spring Awakening’s score was influenced by rock, folk, and electronic music, giving it a sound which was different to the majority of musicals at the time. Because of its youthful, rebellious energy, Spring Awakening resonated strongly with a generation of young people. 

The musical is adapted from Frank Wedekind’s 1891 German play of the same name, and it is simultaneously very true to and a complete reimagining of its original source material. Appropriately for a musical, this paradox is best encapsulated in its songs. Rock-inspired numbers such as ‘The Bitch of Living’, ‘Don’t Do Sadness’, and ‘Totally Fucked’ are worlds away in tone, language, and sound from the stiflingly repressed and authoritarian atmosphere of the musical’s setting. Here, adults view the teenagers’ budding sexual curiosity and questioning of societal norms as a threat to the established order. These songs don’t take place within the show’s core action, but instead in a kind of ‘alternate reality’, or space of psychological revelation. In the original Broadway production, characters would pull out hand-held mics from their clothing and sing directly to the audience. Entering their own personal ‘song-world’, each teenager expresses the thoughts and feelings that they are forbidden or unable to articulate in their ‘real’ lives. 

Once I’d read a translation of Wedekind’s play, it dawned on me how perfect it was, if unexpected, as the source material for a modern rock musical. The musical retains the energy and authenticity of the original play’s young voices, many of which Wedekind based on sketches from his own childhood, and the core themes of censorship and repression which evoke a need for alternate forms of expressing pent-up emotion. After all, what could be more expressive or angsty than rock music? 

The final chapter, and the closing scene 

Musical theatre owes a great debt to the literature of preceding centuries. There are countless more examples of classic literature which have been transformed into modern musical phenomena. Overall, it comes back to one word: inspiration. Often, all we need is one idea to ignite a spark that leads to something greater.

Rich and generative: In conversation with ‘The Glass Menagerie’

0

The Glass Menagerie is one of Tennessee Williams’ most famous plays which, until recently, had escaped my attention. I’m no stranger to Tennessee Williams: that name takes me back three years (oh god) to my sixth-form days, spent poring over A Streetcar Named Desire, and trying to understand what on earth ‘plastic-theatre’ meant, all while my teacher lusted over Marlon Brando’s 1951 portrayal of Stanley. 

Yet The Glass Menagerie is a play with its own value, and not one to be overshadowed by the rest of Williams’ repertoire. After the success of The Creditors last Michaelmas, the Keble-based Crazy Child Productions is set to bring Williams’ breakout work to the Keble O’Reilly. This play’s narrative is told by Tom (Oli Spooner) who spends his time reflecting on the past, his mother Amanda (Lyndsey Mugford), and sister Laura (Matilda Beloou). The family are struggling to make a living in St Louis, and Amanda, an example of Williams’ typical ‘faded Southern Belle’ archetype, desperately wants to find a suitor for her daughter, whose physical disability and social anxiety made her withdraw from the world. 

The memories of the play aren’t confined to the stage; for director George Robson, this is a play he has wanted to do since his sixth form days, but claims that “there just wasn’t time”. However, time certainly isn’t an issue for this particular production, which was scheduled for last term but moved back to Hilary, and out of the BT studio into the much larger space of the Keble O’Reilly. The show is being performed in the round, so the rehearsal began with rearranging the chairs. I took my place in a corner, opposite Crazy Child Productions’ two directors, Magdalena Lacey-Hughes and George Robson.

Lacey-Hughes and Robson decided on this particular circular configuration as it relates to the sense of entrapment in the play. Lacey-Hughes describes how it focuses both the audience and Tom “together on the centre of what’s happening” – in other words, Tom’s memory. The configuration poses some practical challenges: “You can’t hide anything,” Robson notes; there’s no space on stage where the actors can escape the gaze of the audience. This made the rehearsal particularly dynamic, as the directors rotated around the space to check the audience’s sightlines. Spooner contorted himself in his chair as he directed his lines to different sides of the space. The actors imbued these movements with intentionality, discussing why their characters were changing positions, to fit the considerations of the circular space with the script’s meaning. 

Despite the theme of entrapment and enclosure in this play, Robson emphasises that rehearsal is a very free space, where the actors are open to making mistakes. “You can’t do it right, until you know what it looks like to do it wrong,” he told me during our conversation, demonstrating not only his capability as a director but also his potential in a career as a life coach. Perhaps it is this attitude that gave the whole rehearsal its easy feel. The two actors, Mugford and Spooner, who were present at this rehearsal slipped in and out of character with such ease that it was sometimes hard to tell what was genuine casual chatter and what was performance. The roles of the directors and actors sometimes blended into one: Lacey-Hughes stepped into the scene to demonstrate a few dance steps before Spooner, and Mugford discussed the character of Tom with Spooner as they negotiated the scene and the way they wanted to perform it. They asked questions about the script, gained clarity on the meaning through putting Williams’ words into modern terms: “He’s not too good-looking” became: “He’s not straight-up peng”, and “He’s not right-down homely?” became “So he’s chopped?”. This playful conversation demonstrated the freedom of the rehearsal space which allowed the actors to use these unconventional techniques to become more comfortable with their characters’ interactions. 

The two actors demonstrated a deep understanding of the script’s versatility. “You can tweak the phrasing of something, and suddenly you feel like you’re seeing it completely differently,” Mugford explained. This versatility contributes to a certain ambiguity around the characters and the play as a whole – “it’s not necessarily always clear how you should be feeling about what’s happening, and how you should be feeling about the characters,” she continues. It’s for this reason that she describes the play as “murky”, both for the unreliability of the play’s narrative, and the uncertainty regarding each character’s morality. However, Mugford likens the murkiness of this particular play to pond water, rather than pollution. “It’s rich, it’s generative” she describes, and this is certainly evident in Crazy Child Productions’ adaptation of the show. The small snippet of this show which I observed retained all the classic elements of Tennessee Williams’ work as I know it, and yet imbued it with a naturalness which felt invigorating. I left the rehearsal entirely intrigued by the production, by all the things that ran unsaid beneath the characters’ conversation, and even in my conversation with the directors. This very uncertainty, yet richness of potential, has certainly caught my attention. I eagerly anticipate the final product. 

The Glass Menagerie runs at the Keble O’Reilly Theatre from the 4th-8th February. 

Anneliese Dodds on higher education, local politics, and damehood

0

Dodds spoke to Cherwell a few days after appearing in the New Year’s Honours list. Receiving her Damehood, she said, left her feeling “really delighted and very surprised”. What stood out to her most was not the Damehood itself, but rather being recognised alongside “so many incredible people” from Oxford, something which she describes as  “very humbling”.

Appropriately for an MP representing Oxford, Dodds’ career has bridged academia and politics. Before her election as an MP in 2017, she worked as a university lecturer, researching social policy and higher education. This background clearly shapes her view of universities – she sees them not simply as engines of economic growth, but as cultural institutions. As Minister for International Development, Dodds travelled widely, and she warmly recalls memories of repeatedly encountering people whose lives had intersected with British higher education: “Just about everywhere that I went I would find somebody with a link to a UK university.”

Internationalism is central to Dodds’ politics and international students feature prominently in her defence of the current UK higher education system. Dodds observes that there has been a shift away from the Commonwealth towards countries like China, but frames this as a positive development. She pays tribute to “international students [who] support the educational experience of domestic students”. With many UK universities now “cross-subsidised” by overseas fees, she suggests this income helps keep “opportunities open to people” who might otherwise be excluded from higher education altogether.

Dodds’s view of the University of Oxford itself is more complex. She’s clear that she is “so proud” of the “world changing” discoveries that are made at the University. Yet she thinks that the benefits of these discoveries fail to reach the city that hosts them:  “Local people aren’t able to see that benefit as much as I would hope…. One of the things I’m really passionate about is trying to make sure that there is more of a connection, and that the opportunities associated with research and science are more open to local people.” 

To me, this seems unfair to the University. As well as being economically central to Oxford, there are many examples of the outreach initiatives that the University undertakes in order to benefit young people in Oxford. In 2014 the Oxford Learning Centre opened in Blackbird Leys, a part of Dodds’s Oxford East constituency. The Centre helps to educate students from age 7 to 18 and in the last decade has supported 5,000 local children. Personally, I grew up in Oxford, and I remember my own interest in academic study being kindled at primary school by the free after-school science club run by volunteer PhD students. The utter joy of making ice cream using frozen nitrogen convinced me that science was something fun and interesting, although I eventually chose to study history.

From universities, our conversation moves to local politics. I begin by asking whether the government’s high taxation of pubs would continue. Dodds said that the tax burden on pubs was “something that is being looked at”. Later the same day, the government announced its latest U-turn, reducing tax rates on pubs.

On wider ideological questions, Dodds is resistant to claims that the Starmer government had moved too far to the right. Indeed, she pushes back at my description of her as a “soft-left politician”. She says she has “never been a big fan of labels”. Instead, Dodds cites the workers’ rights legislation the Labour government has passed. She sticks closely to the Labour Party line that Starmer’s government should be judged “not just on what they say but on what they do”.

Trying to move her away from the party line, I move onto tackling climate change at a local level, an issue that has sharply divided Oxford over the past few years. Dodds is unequivocal in her criticism of recent measures, particularly the congestion charge. She argues that it had no mandate from the electorate, since it did not appear in the election leaflets of the Liberal Democrat councillors behind the scheme. For her, the most important thing is balancing the climate crisis with local needs, ensuring fairness throughout. She attacked the way in which the congestion charge was introduced, as well as how its profits are used to make the Park and Ride service free – benefiting those commuting from rural Oxfordshire at the expense of those in the city, who the congestion charge affects the most.

For Dodds, it all comes back to fairness. For her, it’s the principle that must anchor any attempt to reconcile climate policy with everyday life, but is also how she frames her broader political aim to unite the people of Oxford East. On the need to tackle climate change, Dodds insists on consensus: “we are all on the same page.”

Oxford tops two sets of University rankings

0

The University of Oxford topped its European and global counterparts in recently released university rankings. Oxford came top of the 2026 Quacquerelli Symonds (QS) European University rankings, released on 28th January. The University was also ranked best in the world for computer and medical sciences in the 2026 Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings by Subject, published on 21st January.

The QS rankings scored Oxford a perfect score of 100 in academic and employment reputation, which are weighted heavily by the survey’s scoring system. Oxford also excelled in the firm’s assessment of the university’s “international research network”, its “faculty-student ratio”, and its “employment outcomes”.

The QS Europe results had Oxford outstrip British rival Imperial College London, which placed two places ahead of it in the QS World rankings released in June last year. Imperial placed third in the new European rankings, behind Oxford and ETH Zurich, a primarily STEM-focused university in Switzerland. 

The THE World University Rankings for “medical and health” put Oxford narrowly ahead of University of Cambridge, ETH Zurich, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which topped the THE rankings for arts and humanities, business and economics, and social sciences. Oxford was also awarded top score by THE for computer science, with the same immediate runners-up. This is the 15th year running that Oxford has been ranked top for medicine, and the 8th that it has topped the computer science tables.

QS is a for-profit higher education analysis firm which provides a variety of organisational services to higher education institutions. It was founded in 1990 to assist students looking to study abroad, and is involved in the promotion and administration of the Erasmus programme.

In response to the rankings, Oxford Vice-Chancellor Irene Tracey said: “At a moment when the UK is rightly seeking closer partnership with Europe, including renewed participation in programmes such as Erasmus, this recognition is particularly meaningful. It affirms Oxford’s long-standing role as a European university with a global outlook, committed to openness, collaboration and public service.”

The prioritisation of STEM in QS rankings has been a source for criticism. Several of the rankings’ measurements of institutional influence are based on citation databases which weigh STEM subjects above arts and humanities.

In 2011, an opinion article in the New Statesman called the QS rankings “a load of old baloney”. Writer David Blanchflower criticised the fact that 50% of the survey’s points come from an institution’s reputation among other academics and employers, whose position to make a judgement is questionable.

Other criticisms of the QS rankings have alleged that the firm’s results are Eurocentric, and that the sample size of their reputation survey, at between 2% and 8% of the available respondents, is too small to be reliable.

Between 2004 and 2005, QS and THE jointly published the THE-QS World University Rankings. THE cited a perceived favouritism in the QS rankings for sciences over humanities, as well as other methodological issues, as reasons for the split.

QS and THE were approached for comment.

How not to decolonise a museum: ‘Suturing Wounds’ at the Pitt Rivers

0

Today, the colonial history of the Pitt Rivers Museum is common knowledge. Whether you know of the details or just the dodgy vibes, the Pitt Rivers once represented an era of brutal European colonisation, with valuable objects stolen from communities and held in Oxford for their ‘exotic’ and ‘curious’ qualities. Despite efforts to supposedly decolonise the museum and honour the descendants of those exploited by colonialism, the museum has a long way to go. The lingering colonial rhetoric and problematic methods of display are no more evident than in the museum’s latest photographic exhibition, Suturing Wounds.

In the photos, Egyptian artist Sara Sallam sheds light on the exploitative and colonial 19th-century practice of violently excavating Byzantine-era Egyptian cemeteries to steal textiles from the deceased. She poses in front of Blythe House in London, a huge storage facility containing millions of artefacts from British museums, and wears a tunic made of facsimiles of late antique Egyptian textiles, sewn together by the artist herself. Once worn to express social status and Christian devotion, western colonists admired them for their aesthetic value alone. They ignored the dignity of the dead and instead proceeded to inflict more violence against Christians in the Middle East, which continues today in the persecution of Palestinian Christians, the direct descendants of such rich but exploited traditions. As a Byzantinist myself, I was extremely pleased to see this under-researched aspect of history explored in a tender, personal way. Sallam stitched together reproductions of textiles from the Akhmim cemetery to represent the literal suturing of the wounds created by colonisation. The additional medium of photography situates the tunic in a colonial setting and thereby renders its use an act of protest, a confrontation of colonised and coloniser through material objects. 

When I visited the exhibition, I initially could not find it. Tucked behind tall cases on the very top gallery, the view from the ground floor consisted simply of bright pink words describing the photos. Eventually, when I found it, I had one thought only: was this it? The photos were used as a sort of wallpaper to be placed on some doors, probably storing more stolen artefacts. An effect of this was that I could not actually see much of the subject of the photos. This was exacerbated by the fact that the wood beams of the doors cut through much of the image of the tunic itself. Likewise, with the image taking up an entire wall, Sallam only reached my height, a mere five feet and two inches – anyone taller than me would probably struggle to see for this reason, and there was hardly enough space between the doors and the cases opposite to stand back and take in a larger view. I found that I actually had a better time viewing these photos online rather than in person.

Perhaps the most egregious issues, however, were that the images were of low quality (I could see the pixels) and that one of the wood beams cut through the sign which showed the background to be Blythe House. The entire point of the photographic medium was rendered null and void, as the viewer was given virtually no information. Would the average viewer have known the context? No. In fact, the two friends I attended the exhibition with were clueless, understanding the vaguely anti-colonial messaging but unaware of the specific culture represented and why. There were no captions to explain the significance of the textiles, leaving the viewer in the dark. In fact, I worry that this results in the content of the artwork being misunderstood by most, reduced instead to an aesthetic object once again. It is such a shame that Sallam’s work, fascinating in itself, was displayed so carelessly, despite the artist herself being a co-curator. Unfortunately, these practices seem to align with the enduring colonial spirit that permeates the museum as a whole.

My own family was torn apart by British colonisation in Ireland, inheriting the generational problems of addiction, poverty, and identity loss. To this day, I have never met any of my estranged Irish family, and I feel a sense of emptiness knowing that I will never have a connection to an entire half of myself. This context shaped my experience at the Pitt Rivers. I can only imagine how it must feel to have been affected by the horrors of slavery and genocide, and seeing sacred objects from my culture displayed so recklessly in the museum. The museum’s approach to decolonisation can be characterised with one word: passive. Performative activism checked off the list, the museum simply places a plaster over the wounds caused by colonisation. Signs designed to separate the museum from problematic practices are completely separate from their cabinets – the viewer is not challenged at all.

Sallam’s project is a bold look into the effects of colonisation on Egyptian communities today, but ultimately falters in its display in the Pitt Rivers Museum, which cannot separate itself from its colonial history. Until its orientalist and careless presentation of artefacts is changed, I do not believe that it can meaningfully champion decolonial art. Take the relatively small display of the Evil Eye, the caption of which begins by describing the practice in the past tense, before adding an appendage which briefly mentions its continuance. Archaising language like this, treating colonised cultures as though they are remnants of the past in need of archaeological ‘discovery’, is to reduce these traditions to primitivity and erase the living communities who continue to practice them today. Entrapment of Sallam’s photos to the very architecture of the Pitt Rivers itself represents the endurance of colonial curation which characterises the museum.

This article refers to a temporary display hosted by the PRM on behalf of Photo Oxford Festival. The artist and Photo Oxford oversaw the design, production, and installation of the display which ended on 25 January 2026.