Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 368

Classics Moderations cancelled and replaced with Prelims

0

Following an open letter with 90 signatories calling on the Classics Faculty to cancel Mods, the Faculty has instead opted to replace the traditional exams with a new Classics Prelim.

In an email sent to the signatories of the open letter and others who are entered for Mods, the Faculty’s stance was made clear that the “well-argued letter about Mods’”was “taken into account by the board of examiners”. Ultimately it was argued that “the University thinks it will be to your benefit to have marks available from formal public examinations”.

The open letter cited five primary concerns surrounding these exams and why they believed they should be cancelled in their entirety: the considerable uncertainty of the current situation; disruption to teaching; approaches taken to other exams; problems with the online/’open book’ format; significant access and equality issues. 

An email from a tutor further outlined that all translation elements from the text-based papers will be removed, and there will be no Texts and Contexts papers.. The email from the Faculty similarly stated that “it was inappropriate to use translation from set texts (or indeed any unseens with translations available online)” without remote invigilation which “for so large a cohort would not be possible’. 

Yet the open letter pre-supposed issues surrounding this stating that “Mods is primarily, even  notoriously, about the texts and the language skills that mastering them requires” and by removing this element “render it a shadow of its intended form’ and ‘students whose particular talents lie in translations … lose out entirely on getting the acknowledgement and reward for their academic achievements in those respects.” 

The format of these exams will “be sat as open-book exams on-line (using the same procedures as for Finals last year, which worked well)”. The Faculty email said “We hope that the detailed guidance to follow on open-book examinations will relieve worries about excessive reliance on published commentaries.” Students will also be permitted the use of dictionaries for their language papers. 

Another difference from the previous format is that Prelims can be retaken – the told students that “unlike Mods, there is provision to resit Prelims (at the end of Trinity Term) in the very unlikely event that things go badly wrong”.

This update does not quell the fears of some students, with one telling Cherwell that “there are many more impactful things happening in the world right now” and while he is glad they have decided to half the number of exams  “it really is not an environment where they can ethically ask students to sit 10 papers of 3 hours”. 

The Faculty has not provided any information regarding how these new Prelims will be graded or how extenuating circumstances will be considered.

Image Credit: Lewis Clarke / Oxford : Ashmolean Museum / CC BY-SA 2.0.

Review: Mischief Movie Night

0

If you’re missing the theatre then livestreams of shows are an excellent way to keep enjoying it! Mischief Movie Night, an improv comedy show streamed by Mischief Theatre, is a great way to spend a night in lockdown.

The beauty of improv is that each performance will be different. In just three shows, I witnessed a horror set in a nursery, an angsty vampire teen story set in a French palace, and a spy thriller in the Amazon.

The show is cleverly set up with certain (higher paying) audience members streaming via zoom and contributing ideas for the improv, with the rest viewing via a link. The cast also take to twitter for ideas, leading to wild inclusions such as the spy turned love-interest koala bear, and the award for “most dramatic opening of an umbrella”. I never thought the opening of an umbrella could be dramatic. A full improvised musical number later, I was proved wrong.

The actors were sharp, witty and full of energy despite lacking an audience. Dave Hearn, Bryony Corrigan and Henry Lewis were all hilarious, but it was Harry Kershaw who truly stood out, switching characters effortlessly from a four poster bed (yes, really) to a spy, continuously forgetting his character’s name yet playing it for laughs, and bringing enormous energy to his performance in order to win the award for “loneliest conga line”.

Mischief Movie Night is a funny and engaging show that is sure to brighten up even the darkest lockdown night.

Image Credit: Gudmund Thai. Licence: CC BY 3.0.

Reinvention: rethinking gender and race on stage

It was late March 2019, and my friends and I had just managed to grab some last-minute tickets to see The Taming of the Shrew at the RSC. Even though I do not live not far from the RSC, until this point, I had never seen a Shakespeare play live. Keen to make up for lost time, I was excited as we piled into the cheap seats that our hastily-bought student tickets afforded us. Not even the obstruction of several pillars could dampen the sense of anticipation that lingered in the air.

I must also add the caveat that I hadn’t even read The Taming of the Shrew and only had the vaguest sense of the plot from my childhood obsession with 10 Things I Hate About You. So, apart from the notable absence of Heath Ledger and Julia Stiles, this production immediately stood out for its reversal of gender roles. For a play noted as a witty comedy of female submissiveness and relationship woes, there was a horrific poignancy in the subjugation and gaslighting of the male Kate within the context of the #MeToo movement. Though the reversal was largely played for comic effect, it felt jarring as the entire perspective of the play shifted. It felt daring and bold and thought-provoking — exactly how theatre should feel.

This production was clearly not the first to play with expectations of gender or race. From Patrick Stewart’s portrayal of Othello in a race-reversed cast to Tamsin Greig’s masterful evocation of Malvolia, the Shakespearian world offers realms of possibility for reinvention. The all-black theatre company Talawa produced its version of King Lear in 2016, providing a framework to explore the political tensions of the Windrush scandal and the Brexit referendum. This diversity of casting provides a diversity of experience on stage and often raises interesting tensions which breath fresh new life into the well-known works.

When whiteness is incidental to characterisation or the gender of a character is not explicitly stated, a meritocratic approach to casting should be applauded and championed. Critics of colour-blind casting often drone on that it threatens the verisimilitude of the performance and that seeing a black Eponine or an Asian Elphaba on stage detracts from their total immersion in the play. These people are willing to suspend their disbelief when they see a misunderstood witch bursting into a catchy ballad at the drop of a hat or French rebels putting aside their urgent political activism to rally together on the barricades for a belting encore in Act Two, but draw the line firmly on seeing racial diversity on stage. If this is the hill that they are willing to die on, their argument is at best tenuous and at worst dangerously misguided.

Diversity on stage should be the status-quo. If theatres are to be the bastion of daring and bold creativity that they should aspire to be, they should break down the traditional constraints on who does and should play roles on stage, like the musical Hamilton does by recounting America’s past through the diverse lens of the present. Those who argue that colour-blind casting always poses a threat to the integrity of plays and musicals should get their head out of the sand. If everyone always tried so ardently to preserve the ‘essence’ of theatre, whatever that may be, we would still be stuck with the outdated mentality of Shakespeare’s era that women should not be able to act on stage. Theatre should be synonymous with reinvention and change.

However, colour-blind casting is not without its problems. Arguing for ‘colour-blind’ casting can be a myopic way of tackling racial inequalities. It is the thespian equivalent of parroting “I don’t see race”. Race, and gender, are inextricable parts of many characters and to ignore the tensions that they can create within a play does a disservice to actors and cements inequalities. These factors should not be the only parts of a character that matter — we have moved beyond this reductive, archetypal approach to diversity — but casting directors need to be conscious of the choices that they make. If people of colour are inadvertently always cast in the role of the villain or the outsider, this can further entrench racial stereotypes. If stories with racial tensions at the core are not faithfully represented, it undercuts the very real and horrific abuses and violations of the rights of people of colour. If playwrights that identify as LGBTQ+ or as people of colour are not afforded the right to write their own stories, their voices become silenced. Marginalised actors should not just be shoehorned into pre-existing plays without any respect or provision for the stories they have to tell. To do so is to package diversity into commercially successful morsels that are digestible for largely white, middle-class audiences.

Theatre should be daring and bold and thought-provoking. My first experience of the RSC opened my eyes to that. Theatre has the duty to reflect diversity and prioritise an inclusive approach to casting. But this approach should not be blind; it is more glaringly obvious than ever that casting directors should approach their role with a critical eye, conscious of the possible ramifications of a thoughtless approach to diversity but always aware of the transformative benefits of a thoughtful one.

Image Credit: Ikin Yum / RSC.

New College’s exempt students asked to consider withdrawing their application to return

0

New College has asked students to consider withdrawing their application to return to the college during Hilary term after they received more applications than they could accommodate, according to an email seen by Cherwell.

Students were invited to apply to return to the college for Hilary Term if they lacked access to “appropriate study spaces” at home, required “additional support” including for mental health reasons, had been resident in the college over the Christmas vacation, or were an international student whose travel plans could not be changed. However, the college says they received “far too many” applications and would not be able to accommodate them all.

The email, sent on January 8th, asked students planning to return on the weekend before Noughth Week not to do so unless they have pre-booked travel arrangements or “no other choice”. The college’s returns criteria only allows students to return under “the most extremis of circumstances”.

The Home Bursar, Gez Wells, warned that the college would be reviewing the list of students who had applied to return and “reject a number of those who currently have approval”. “I am aware that some applications have been made for social reasons”, Mr Wells continued, “I need to emphasise that the early part of term in Oxford whilst we are under National Lockdown restrictions will not be social in any shape or form, you will remain under the same legal restrictions as you do in your own homes and the College will take a very hard line on rule breakers.” He also noted: “For every student that returns to College, I have to ask a member of staff to leave the safety of their own homes to return to College to support you.”

Students have been invited to withdraw their applications by emailing the Academic Registrar before noon on Monday January 11th. After that, the college will confirm the final list of students who will be allowed to return before First Week. The request has been made to ensure that the limited number of spaces available in college go to the students in greatest need.

Students who return will have their socialising restricted to within their COVID households. Sport will be banned, and alcohol will not be available to purchase through the bar or dining hall. College scouts will continue to clean communal areas, while students are responsible for their own rooms. Catering will be provided in Hall for students who do not have access to kitchens.

New College has been approached for comment.

Image: simononly/ CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Clubs in crisis: the UK’s declining night time industry

0

This New Year’s Eve, I changed my location to New Zealand on Google then searched up ‘NYE events’. Instead of spending my NYE nauseous off Jägerbombs I was turning green with jealousy, faced with images of packed live music events and sweaty clubs. New Zealand is COVID-free and therefore bars, pubs and clubs have reopened. 

As the NHS contends with a crisis, this prospect is correctly at the bottom of Britain’s priorities list. I’m not advocating for the Rita Ora-esque approach (throwing a 30-person party in lockdown). Nevertheless, if not for a healthy dose of nostalgia to remedy bitter envy, remembering the cultural importance of clubbing will ensure the scene doesn’t collapse entirely. 

In October, the government announced an aid package of £257 million for UK venues as part of the Arts Council England’s Culture Recovery Fund. Providing around £1 million to Motion in Bristol, £500,000 to the capital’s Corsica Studios and various other amounts to both big and small businesses, its arrival was welcomed. Further grants have also been awarded since, including to more venues outside of London, though still excluding many smaller clubs.

However, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of government measures. The CEO of the Night Time Industries Association, Michael Kill has noted their constant U-turns have left clubs crippled, and when applying for compensation or aid, “the level of ignorance from Government for the Night Time Economy & Hospitality Businesses, particularly Nightclubs, venues and freelancers has been shameful”. Revolution Bar Chief executive called the £1000 grants “derisory and insulting”. 

The Tory government does not have the best record for supporting the arts or night-time industry. Johnson’s 2019 announcement of the ‘largest cultural capital programme in the century’ was only a quarter of Labour’s commitment of £1bn billion and the support offered in October was hard fought, driven by popular support for the #LetUSDance petition that received over 145,000 signatures. Let’s also not forget the Sunak vs the Arts debacle in October. Though ultimately ITV News misquoted Sunak’s comments about musicians finding new jobs, and the Fatima Cyber First advert was misrepresented in memes, it instilled a sense of doom for the arts industry. 

With a fraught history between Tory MPs and clubbing, it’s understandable that the NTIA feel they’ll face the chopping block first. Former Foreign Office Minister Henry Bellingham once said, “Obviously the best club in London is the House of Commons.” Dominic Cummings was still the registered managing director of Klute in Durham when he went to test his eyesight back in the spring, voted the worst club in the whole of Europe. At Oxford, we know all too well Tory MP’s prefer different clubbing experiences to the average university student, frequenting a different Bullindgon Club to the one on Cowley Road.

Petty jibes aside, the Conservatives didn’t solely create the crisis facing clubs (though they haven’t really helped them). Neither did COVID-19: UK nightlife has been suffering from long-term malaise for many years now. London lost more than half of its nightclubs between 2007-2017 and some truly historic venues closed through the decade, often due to redevelopment programs, rising rents and unsympathetic councils. Cable, London closed in 2013 after Network Rail took possession of the site. The Arches, Glasgow shut in 2015 after a midnight curfew was introduced making business untenable. Café de Paris announced its closure this Christmas after 96 years, surviving even the Blitz in the 1940s.

Across both parties, rescue efforts have had limited success. London Mayor Sadiq Khan did set up the independent Night Time Commission to create a ’24-hour London’, with a ‘Night Tzar’ to introduce its ten recommendations. However, current Tzar Amy Lamé has faced intense criticism for her response to the pandemic, though it’s been questioned if this is fair, as she holds little influence in the licensing decisions that tend to crush venues and limited fiscal resources. Nevertheless, her response to criticism doesn’t feel me with unbridled hope and joy: “If you want a night tsar that will be out partying every night, you’ve got the wrong night tsar.” I imagined more of a hedonistic character like one of the Ibiza Four, perhaps naively. 

Some have subsequently seen clubbing’s decline as an inevitability caused by evolving consumer habits. In America and other parts of Europe nightclub and bar attendance has declined, letting recent governments and local councils somewhat off the hook. Still, I have always found these explanations slightly jarring. They tend to rely on caricatures of young people and exaggerate generational differences. For example, an Independent article in 2015 ran the headline: “Why Millennials are no longer going to nightclubs…. We no longer go down to the club to find new music, we just listen to curated playlists on Spotify.” Other quotes include, “These days, people want to take pictures and they need something to take pictures of [with the implication clubs don’t make the cut].”

 I have serious doubts. Park End isn’t beloved for playing new music, but for playing floor-filling ‘cheese’ hits: people go to get drunk with their friends and sing-along to songs their parents liked. From personal experience in lockdown 1, 2 and 3, listening to Spotify playlists doesn’t quite match the heady excitement lingering in my college bar on a Thursday night either. I concede, we might be a narcissistic, selfie-obsessed generation, but this isn’t incompatible with a good night out. Nightclubs still hold an important place in the British psyche. Manchester’s infamous Haçienda (closed in 1997, then demolished and replaced with flats in 2002) still generates documentaries and op-pieces. Look up Haçienda on Spotify, and you’ll find countless playlists inspired by Madchester, acid house, 24 Hour Party People and other facets of 80s/90s rave culture (with Gen Z followers!). 

Of course, as absence makes the heart grow fonder, one must be wary of sentimentality. For decades clubs have been plagued by drug use, and this article does not seek to minimize such issues. The Haçienda closed because gang violence was frequent and people were spending their money on anything other than drinks. More recently, Fabric closed in 2016 after the death of two young clubbers on narcotics, which caused Islington Council to revoke their license. However, it eventually reopened after much campaigning and public outcry. 

Still, I’d argue shutting nightclubs could cause more harm. Nightclubs are the modern repackaging of the universal phenomenon of measured hedonism; if lost, people will simply move the party elsewhere. Illegal raves have already exploded in 2020, and their proliferation post-pandemic would presumably increase the probability of drug-related deaths. Attendees may lack access to immediate medical care, can easily attend underage, and may be more reluctant to seek help or be less informed on how to minimize risk. A joint report by the All-Parliamentary Group for Drug Policy Reform, Durham University, the Loop and Volteface seeking to minimise drug-related harm stressed how clubs have the capacity to safely manage drug consumption. Alongside current measures advised in the 2002 Safer Clubbing Guide, the introduction of drug testing services similar to those implemented at festivals could further limit drug-related deaths, which are often caused by people unwittingly taking mixed substances or especially potent pills. These testing services have had great success so far, with a 95% decrease in drug-related hospital admissions from the 2016 Secret Garden Party Festival in Cambridgeshire after a testing pilot took place.

I think there’s something extra special about clubs that warrant their protection. They are liminal spaces: young people on the cusp of adulthood congregate in them, varying identities converge in the anonymity of a dark dancefloor and strangers can share fleeting moments of intimacy. Historic nightclubs are especially significant, as different generations, each producing their own subcultures, aesthetic trappings and musical genres can share a single space over many decades. 

I’ll admit, clubbing does mean a lot to me personally, as an interest in British dance/club music bridges the generational gap between my Dad and I. It’s hard for many people to imagine their parents when they were teenagers, but seeing New Order with mine on my eighteenth birthday reminded me there’s a lot we share with our elders, and that they might understand my teenage angst more than I believe. Returning to Fabric, it’s clear clubs generate strong emotions for many others. Flowers outside of Fabric in 2016 were labelled, “R.I.P Fabric, You’ve gone to join The End, Bogleys, SE1, Turnmills and The Fridge in the big club in the sky. Thank you for all the good times and for the amazing music. Greg x PS. Please Don’t become a Tesco Metro!”. Trainspotting author Irvine Welsh called the closure, “the beginning of the end of our cities as culture centres”.

Greg’s fears of a Fabric x Tesco collaboration never materialized, but many nightclubs have faced grimmer fates. Ed Gillett has explored the ongoing class issue in underground dance music and how gentrification threatens famous nightclub venues. Club 414 in Brixton is provided as a striking example, purchased in 2019 in an attempt to ‘save’ the venue. The original owners were quietly ousted soon after, and although the newly owned business is yet to unveil itself, its future is bleak. The current owners’ development company faced protests for installing segregated ‘poor doors’ in a new Aldgate property in 2014, separate entrances for affordable housing occupants in new developments. I wonder how they will decide to ‘preserve’ the historical and cultural value of Club 414.

Clubs are not apolitical spaces; their existence and ownership are important to marginalized identities, and the pandemic threatens many. Berlin’s queer scene is aided by its thriving gay nightclubs from Berghain to Betty F***. Stonewall Inn saw the 1969 Stonewall riots, and became the cradle of the modern LGBT rights movement. For young people, especially those who face discrimination, the nightclub – especially ones with links to local communities rather than corporations (sorry, this does not include Fever) – is a liberating playground for escapism and safer experimentation. In fact, most mainstream clubbing trends have their origins in queer culture. Disco music first began in New York gay bars popular with people of colour, before it began to cater for white, middle-class America.

Clubs have always been the vanguard of countercultural movements. The radical Italian post-war architects in ‘Gruppo 9999’ used clubs as playgrounds for their pioneering, opening Space Electronic in 1969. Converted from an engine repair shop, its movable furniture and quirky props (including a vegetable garden) turned the club space into a modern theatre. Since the swinging sixties, nightclubs have continued to display their propensity for regeneration. The Cause in Tottenham turned itself into a socially distanced street food chill-out this summer, a significant shift from its infamous ‘Adonis’ nights, frequented by big European DJs like Roi Perez and Tama Sumo. The legendary techno club Berghain, famed for its strict door policy and secrecy, reinvented itself as an art gallery this year, showcasing over 100 Berlin artists’ work. Other clubs haven’t been so lucky, but have still resorted to live-streamed DJ sets to try to generate some income and much-needed positivity. If these developments became permanent fixtures, certain clubs could develop their brands, reaching international audiences and customers less keen on big nights out. 

If one needs any more convincing, in purely financial terms, clubs are indispensable industries. The night-time economy employs over 1.3 million people, contributes £66 billion to the UK economy per annum, and the NTIA claims nearly 800,000 jobs are currently at risk. This collapse would create collateral damage across the hospitality industry, as taxi services, late-night fast food shops and beauty salons rely on nights out for customers. Morley’s, a fast food chicken chain in London, announced its sales around clubbing areas had dropped 25% over the summer.

In cultural terms, I don’t think their contribution can really be quantified. Yale professor Dr. Nicholas Christakis claims that in 2024 we will see the start of our own “roaring 20s” filled with post-pandemic parties, which investors will surely seek to capitalize on by investing again in nightlife. Yet, if we fail to support clubs financially, we run the risk of historic venues being closed and ownership being changed, devastating individuals whose lives are currently dependent on the industry and cutting club world from its rich roots. Similarly, with forced closures, now is the perfect time to reform the night time industry. If we want to the post-pandemic renaissance to have a stage to play out on in the future, further aid must be offered now.

If you are interested in supporting the UK’s night-time economy, an All-Party Parliamentary Group has been established and is seeking for employers and consumers to submit evidence: All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for the Night Time Economy. – Night Time Industries Association (ntia.co.uk)

Image credit: CCO via pixy.org.

Colleges release guidance regarding returns after national lockdown announced

0

Following the announcement that university students will be able to return under the previous exemptions outlined despite the return to national lockdown, colleges have provided varying responses.

Merton has urged its students to stay at home, stating “if you are able to continue to work from home satisfactorily then you should do so.” Merton has advised that having other members of a family working in the home or not having a desk in a student’s room “are not, in and of themselves, reasons to return.”

Students currently resident at Merton, whatever their course, have been asked “to return home for this period of lockdown” wherever possible, despite this being listed as one of the exemptions under which students may remain in Oxford.  

At different colleges, different processes of approval for return have been put in place. At Balliol, students require exceptional permission from the Welfare Lead and Domestic Bursar, and stressed that they “will have very tough criteria for agreeing any applications, given the importance of minimising the further spread of the virus in Oxford.”

University College’s rejection email for students applying to return to Oxford is brief: “I hope you and your family are well at this time. The decision has been made by The Bronze Team to decline your early arrival application on the basis of current information. I am sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you”.

Christ Church highlighted in their communication that “an imminent academic submission deadline […]  is not a permitted reason for an early return exemption.” Students returning to Christ Church have been asked to submit a new request through their pandemic communication email. At St Hugh’s College, requests are to be re-submitted and approved by the accommodation manager.

At Mansfield College, requests must go through the Senior Tutor. They highlighted in their guidance to international students that they “strongly recommend that you cancel your flight unless there is a pressing welfare reason for you to return.”

Image Credit: Tom Ord. Licence: CC BY-SA 2.5.

Brexit hits Merton food supply chain

0

The Domestic Bursar of Merton College has revealed that a combination of the national lockdown and Brexit have disrupted the college’s food supply chain.

In an email sent to Merton students, the Domestic Bursar warned that “our food supply chain is currently being impacted by the effects of the national lockdown and post-Brexit border arrangements with the EU”. This disruption would affect the food available at short notice. As a result, food served at the college may be different from what the menu listed. The email did not specify which areas of the supply chain are affected.

Merton will still provide catering services for students who return in Hilary.

The news comes as concern grows over the impact of Britain’s exit from the European Union on trade in and out of the country. Iconic British businesses such as John Lewis and Fortnum & Mason have suspended deliveries to the EU and Northern Ireland due to new trade regulations. UK businesses now how to calculate the cost of tariffs for any goods they export to the EU, along with providing further paper work including a £150 health certificate for each consignment of food.

Some EU firms have stopped delivering to the UK following the imposition of VAT rules, which require the tax to be collected at the point of sale instead of at the point of entry to the UK. Several mail freight companies including DHS, UPS and FedEx/TNT have increased the cost of their services to the UK to account for new customs clearance costs.

One example of disruption cited in Parliament was the £17,500 tariff charged on a shipment of bananas from Ghana upon arrival at Portsmouth. As a member of the European Union, the UK had a trade deal with Ghana worth £722 million in exports and £498 million in imports including fruit, cocoa and oil. The UK government had not managed to roll over the trade deal by January 1st, although a statement by the Department for International Trade have said that an arrangement with the African country “within weeks.”

The ports at Dover and Folkestone have been relatively quiet since the UK left the EU, which is partially down to pre-Christmas and Brexit stockpiling undertaken by some retailers. However Holyhead, the UK’s second largest ferry port, has experienced significant disruption as goods being exported to Northern Ireland have to face new bureaucracy.

Under the Northern Ireland Protocol, the country remains in the EU single market for goods while the rest of the UK has left. This means that food being transported to Northern Ireland from the UK will have to undergo the same customs checks and paperwork as exports to EU countries such as France. Marks & Spencer have warned that 15% of food lines could be unavailable in its shops in Northern Ireland as a result of new import tariffs and other red tape.

Minister for the Cabinet Office Michael Gove has warned hauliers to expect “significant additional disruption” at the Dover-Calais crossing over the coming weeks. He stressed the need for the government to “communicate the precise paperwork that’s required in order to make sure that trade can flow freely.”

Merton College has been approached for comment.

This article has been updated to include a statement from Michael Gove MP.

Image: DWR/CC BY-SA 2.5 via Wikimedia Commons

Major leak at St Catherine’s forces students to leave accommodation

0

Students at St Catherine’s College have been forced to move to new accommodation following a “major leak” in the boiler room.

The flood, which occurred in the early hours of Friday morning, required the attendance of the fire brigade to pump out water from the room. The college later confirmed to students that as a consequence of the leak, both the college’s heating and water supplies were damaged. Students in some accommodation blocks have subsequently been forced to move to temporary rooms until the faults can be fixed.

Meal provision within the college has also been impacted, with no catering available to most students through to at least Tuesday. Those who are isolating will still be able to have food delivered to their rooms, although this will be “a frozen meal instead of a hot lunch”.

In a string of emails sent throughout the day, students at the college were told:

“We have been working through the night to restore the college water supply after our main boiler house flooded..

“Unfortunately it looks unlikely that we will be able to restore the water supply to Staircase 1 – 16 by the end of today.

“Staircase 17 – 19 is self-sufficient from a heating and hot water point of view, so I’ve made the decision to move the residents from Staircase 1 – 16,  who currently have no water, over to Staircase 17 – 19.

“We will also be providing heaters to everyone in college as our central heating system will not be working for the foreseeable future. The heaters have been ordered and will be available for collection from the Lodge later this afternoon.

“PLEASE make sure you follow Covid regulations when moving over to your temporary room – keep your distance from others and wear a face covering.

“Do not worry about moving all of your things over today – moves can be complete by Sunday evening.

“Do not forget to check that all the taps in your staircase are turned off when you leave, this is to avoid possible staircase flooding, when the water does come back on!”

Students at the college have since confirmed that they have been provided with temporary heaters for their rooms.

St Catherine’s has also promised to refund students’ Upay accounts for any meals which they had already booked and which will no longer be provided. Students in isolation who do not wish to receive a frozen (instead of hot) meal can also ask to be reimbursed.

Photo Credit: Kenneth Yarham. Licence:CC BY-SA 2.0.

Science Snippets: Outrageous Octopuses

Current research taking place in the Red Sea has revealed that octopuses are prone to a peculiar habit. They have been seen punching (yes, punching) fish and it appears to be out of nothing other than spite. It is not entirely clear why they do this, but the researchers seem to think it is something to do with keeping the fish around them in check.

Image credit: Vlad Tchompalov on Unsplash

Why 2020 Should Not Be Forgotten

0

If you are anything like me, then lockdown over the vac will have involved a lot of wallowing in social media. Something about being at home and unable to see anyone outside your family has made me self-medicate with a cocktail of Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp. Even though no one is doing anything—or at least not posting blurry recordings of concerts and nightclubs to their stories—I still obsessively check that this is the case. It is the same sense of relief I gain from finding out that I am not the only one that handed my essay in late, even if mine was 2 days overdue and theirs was 2 hours.

One thing that I have observed, however, slurping my social media concoction and scrolling endlessly through Instagram Reels, is a desire to consign 2020 to the dustbin of history. Many want a Men in Black-style mind wipe that will erase the past year from our collective memory, only to be recalled 50 years down the line when a funky new virus dredges up the memories from the bottom of the dustbin. This, I think, is a mistake. 

To avoid sounding like a politician with their learned sentimentality, I will not tell you that we must remember history to learn from its mistakes. That’s excessive. It goes without saying that 2020 will be studied. You could write an article in itself on the unprecedented events that happened in the year (in fact, it would probably be a more interesting article than this one). And 2020 will be studied from every angle you can possibly imagine; I wouldn’t be surprised if 20 years down the line they study the psychology of making bread in lockdown. But what I want is for 2020 not to be erased from our common consciousness, to be cancelled, to become The Year That Must Not Be Named. 

I fully understand the desire for collective amnesia. Throughout my life, there have been many painful moments that I have tried to persuade my friends did not happen, most recently the first night of Fresher’s when I gained an embarrassing sobriquet. I digress. Indeed, the New Year at the best of times encourages a fresh start—new year, new me, etc. But when last year in particular is forgotten, we also forget what it is like to be deprived of things. How sweet will parties and nightclubs be if we keep in mind the memory of lockdowns and Chris Whitty? 

Imagine now that we erase all the events of the year. Remember when murder hornets arrived in the United States? No? Well, clearly the hive mind wipe has already begun. Imagine that we forgot, after such a long and arduous build-up, the departure of a balding narcissist from a position he did not deserve in the first place. No not Trump, not Cummings, but Prince Harry. Imagine how lacking our lives would be without this.   

It already seems inconceivable to think that these happened last year. Do you remember something about the Australian wild fires, the Trump impeachment, the near onset of World War 3? I know, seems like a lifetime ago. And what about the seismic shift in mindset that BLM created—who could forget that? A collective memory reset would simply turn us into one of those celebrities whose #blackouttuesday post was lost amongst a sea of selfies. These are things that should not merely be preserved in one of the more obscure rounds of the 2050 University Challenge. 

2020 illuminated a number of truths about our society, some more tasteful than others. It showed the receptiveness of the British public to slogans, with Bo Jo pumping new rallying cries out like they’re his illegitimate children. In a way it also showed our consideration for other people (although I would like to emphasise that the number of dirty looks I get from old people has increased by at least 15%). It showed how stiff our upper lip truly is. 

Indeed, I could complain with equal zeal about distasteful aspects of society that the pandemic has brought to people’s attention. Yet this would detract from my point. Shame and embarrassment encourage us to stick our fingers in our ears and hum the tune to WAP. An honest appraisal is needed of 2020. 

Nor would this be such a difficult task. 2020 was a remarkably universal experience for people across the globe. On every continent people have been forced to stay inside (except for Antarctica, how I envy thee). Socialist and socialite alike have gone into lockdown. No one can go out and everyone stays in on a Friday night, not just me anymore. People have spent more time and have become better acquainted with themselves (which is unlucky for some more than others). Lots have taken up new hobbies. I for one have taken up knitting. 

So, I don’t think 2020 should be forgotten but that we should remember it for the good and the bad. Although it is a year we would like to erase, and one that gives us more cause than most to, I beg you to keep it as close as a frenemy, despising it enough to continue talking about it.