Sunday, April 20, 2025
Blog Page 608

Cambridge women’s college faces criticism for decision to admit men

0

The college revealed on Monday 11 March that it would be admitting male and female students from the standard university age of 18 from autumn 2021.

Previously, Lucy Cavendish accepted women over 21, and was one of the three remaining women’s colleges in the UK, along with Newnham and Murray Edwards Colleges, both also at Cambridge.

All of Oxford’s former women’s colleges now accept  men, with the final one, St Hilda’s College, admitting the first cohort of male students in 2008.

The principal mission of the college when it was founded in 1965 was to enable mature women to study at Cambridge when women were “severely under-represented” at the University.

President of the college, Professor Dame Madeleine Atkins, said: “Women of all ages now have access to all Cambridge colleges as undergraduates, graduates and Fellows. As a responsible and forward-thinking organisation, it is now important for Lucy Cavendish College to offer opportunities to excellent students from non-traditional backgrounds, regardless of gender.”

The announcement was made after a series of consultations with alumnae, current students, Fellows, donors and staff. According to the college’s official statement, over 2600 people were involved in the decision-making process. The statement alleged that “the vast majority of respondents supported the College in ‘going mixed’”.

However, not everyone was happy with the decision. In response to the move, feminist writer Germaine Greer told The Daily Telegraph: “I think women get on better in their own environment. They are not being watched or judged on their sexual charms and whatnot, they are at home.”

Lucy Cavendish alumna, poet and writer Caron Freeborn tweeted: “So now women like I was won’t get a chance to study in a safe environment. Beyond grief. Shame on you.”

Anne Bruton also wrote on Twitter of her old college: “Lucy Cavendish was founded by female academics who believed the university offered too few and too restricted opportunities for women. They have lost what made them special.”

One current student at the college, who wishes to remain anonymous, told Cherwell: ” [The changes] have taken away one of the safe spaces that women have in the world.

This is especially true for mature women, who need that supportive environment during her university days. Going back to school full-time at a later age means giving up a job, as well as deal with family and childcare (if she has one).

Evidence-based research shows that women have lower self-esteem than men, hence, if we think back about the woman who decided to quit a job she’s good at for a degree, her self-esteem would not be as high as a man who also quit his job for a degree.

She will need extra support, her own space living and studying space and her own community where she felt safe and secure in herself. 

By giving up her unique admissions policy, Lucy Cavendish run the risk of no longer being able to be true to its original ethos in supporting the education of mature women.”

The college has pledged to be “mindful” of students’ concerns with commitments to provide women-only accommodation to those who request it for “personal, cultural, or religious reasons.”

Honorary fellows of Lucy Cavendish college include actress Dame Judi Dench, TV presenter and founder of the Women’s Equality Party Sandi Toksvig, and writer Ali Smith.

Proposal to close Language Centre Library meets staunch opposition

0

Plans by the University to close the Language Centre Library at the end of Trinity Term have been met with a petition signed by over 1,200 people.

The petition, started by the current Language Centre librarian Lucile Deslignères, has received support from groups including the Oxford University French Society and the German Society.

The Language Centre cites “low and declining usage” as the principal reason for closure. However, according to the petition official library statistics show usage has risen by approximately 75% since 2012.

The proposed plan would involve splitting the current collection around other locations in Oxford, while sending a number of works to the bookstack in Swindon.  

Subject Consultant at the Taylor Institution Library Nick Hearn described the decision as “one that threatens to destroy a collection of national importance embedded in and very much part of the Language Centre.”

He went on to state that the closure would “have a knock-on effect on other libraries in Oxford–including the Taylorian.”

The Oxford branch of the University and College Union also expressed their concern about the proposed closure. Co-Vice-President Svenja Kunze called on the governing body to conduct a “full consultation with all stakeholders, including the Language Centre and the wider Oxford University students and staff.”

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: The number of registrations at the Library has fallen considerably in recent years […] in the light of this declining usage, the increasing availability of online learning materials, and the need to increase efficiency, we are currently consulting on proposals to move many of the library’s holdings to the Bodleian Libraries.

“Locating the relevant library resources in the Bodleian libraries would retain them for language study in Oxford, and preserve the diversity of language materials that has been built up. Better disabled access to the resources would become possible, and the resources would be accessible for longer opening hours than at the Language Centre.

“The Language Centre is the University’s hub for language learners, and we are committed to ensuring it continues to provide a high-quality service for students, staff and other learners.”

Those opposing the library’s closure reference British Council statistics, which show a decline in language learning since the 1990s. In a letter to the Oxford Magazine, Co-Vice-President Kunze expressed concern “about the message the University is sending about the importance of language learning: at a time when the teaching and learning of foreign languages is at an all-time low in British schools.”

An email was sent out on Wednesday of 8th week to let students know that consultation was taking place on “proposals to move many of the library’s holdings to the Bodleian Libraries.” The email was sent only to those currently enrolled in the Language Centre and gave no mention of closure.

A recent post on the Language Centre website confirms that the consultation will be ongoing until the 31st of May.  Students and staff have expressed disappointment to Cherwell at being notified so soon before the vacation.

The library is the most diverse facility of any UK language centre, with over 200 languages represented, and has been cited as a model of excellence by the Russell Group.

In addition, the librarian and extended-hours assistants would see their posts abolished, with no equivalent roles being created as substitute.

Corpus Christi JCR calls for Parks College plans to be stopped

0

Corpus Christi College’s JCR Executive Committee has sent an open letter to the Vice-Chancellor objecting to the proposals for a new postgraduate college. The letter argued the University had failed to engage sufficiently with University members regarding the proposals, and suggested that “this college has no goal other than increasing student numbers.”

Parks College, a new postgraduate college proposed by the University to begin accepting undergraduates in 2020, aims to “draw together researchers from different disciplines to explore some of the big scientific questions of our time.”

The new college will use the Radcliffe Science Library site as part of the library’s redevelopment. The college will also aim to provide accommodation elsewhere. The Corpus Christi Executive Committee believe that “The “co-location” of Parks College and the Radcliffe Science Library will undermine both.  Every space is temporary: a room will one day be a library, the next, a seminar room, the day after, a public exhibition.

“How can academia flourish without a permanent space? The students and fellows of Parks College will instead remain confined to their respective Departments, defeating the ideal of interdisciplinary studies.”

Students also raised concerns about their opportunities to engage with the University on the Parks College proposals. During a JCR meeting about the letter, its author, Ed Hart, said: “I think it’s important to push against the lack of communication. It is a huge project and was pushed through within three months.”

In the letter, the committee wrote: “The proposal has been made with little to no attempt to engage with University members. The proposal was first mooted in August, in the provisional 2018–23 strategic plan, and it was presumed the creation of any college would be closer to 2023 than today.

“The plan was confirmed after the end of Michaelmas term 2018, after the publication of the final Gazette of the year, preventing serious discussion of it.

“Now, it is to be rushed through Congregation, with plans to hire fellows in just three months’ time. Meanwhile, student and faculty publications fume incredulously and faculties have been left expressing surprise that an important laboratory may become a dining hall.

“We find it concerning that such a monumental decision has been made without adequate consultation of the students you claim to represent.”

The committee also raised concerns about the purpose of the college, since it does not have an overtly outreach focus.

They said: “The proposed college fails to embrace Oxford’s long history of founding colleges to include those from marginalised backgrounds and to improve the lives of those outside the College system. Consider the foundation of the women’s colleges, the foundation of Mansfield College for non-conformist Christians and the foundation of St Catherine’s and St Cross for those without college affiliation.

“Parks College fails on both counts, its website paying lip service to “[embracing] internationalism and diversity” and the benefits of college life.”

“120 years ago, Ruskin College, Oxford, was founded to expand education access to adults with few or no qualifications. It embodies many of the qualities admired in the University’s own colleges. Parks College has none of them.

“The University offers nothing – a half-hearted college, cynically preying on outsiders’ unfamiliarity with Oxford – in return for self-aggrandisement and tuition fees. This proposal demeans the University and the Colleges. It must be reconsidered.”

Responding to the letter, Professor Lionel Tarassenko, Senior Responsible Owner for the Parks College Project, said: “Parks College addresses one of the key education priorities in the University’s Strategic Plan, which is to increase the intake of graduate students across all four divisions by up to 850 a year by 2023, while maintaining quality.

“It will enable the University to grow the number of graduate students, but without upsetting the balance between undergraduate and postgraduate student numbers in mixed colleges or imposing unrealistic targets for growth in the existing graduate colleges.

“The proposed new graduate college will actively promote interdisciplinary exchanges between researchers from across the four academic divisions. It will offer graduate students a rich and stimulating intellectual and social experience, on a par with that at the other graduate colleges.

“And, as with other graduate colleges at Oxford, it will have an outward-looking and inclusive ethos, which embraces internationalism and diversity. As with St Cross College when it was founded, the Fellows of the college will be University professors and researchers who do not currently have a college affiliation.

“Far from leading to a loss of library facilities, the Parks College project presents an exciting opportunity to redevelop the science library and its services to align more closely with the needs of scientists in the 21st century – students, researchers and other academics.

“The proposals for the new college have been discussed with graduate student representatives, the staff of the Radcliffe Science Library, and at meetings of numerous University committees, including the Curators of the University Libraries, Education Committee, Conference of Colleges Graduate Committee, Conference of Colleges, Finance Committee, Personnel Committee and Council. Throughout this consultation process, the plans have been gradually evolving to take on new ideas and to ensure that concerns raised are understood and addressed.

“The plans for the new college and the allocation of space were approved by Council on 11 March, and will now be put before Congregation in early Trinity term. The OUSU VP for Graduates is a member of the Programme Board which is responsible for the development of the plans.

“We are actively encouraging students to participate in the planning for the new college. We have been running Q&A events for students in partnership with OUSU, and we are inviting students to help shape the academic blueprint of the college at a series of focus groups, which will take place in late April and early May.”

In the motion for the JCR Committee to sign the letter, the Corpus JCR President Rhiannon Ogden-Jones was also mandated to discuss the issue with other JCR presidents and the Corpus MCR to seek their support. The motion was passed with 13 votes for and 2 against.

The University have been contacted for comment.

NoFriendz: “Show up next time Oxford, you bastards”

0

NoFriendz have no friends. No wonder. They throw cans, they’re “belligerent…not very nice people”. But despite singer Angus Knight’s self-assessment, NoFriendz are pretty great. They’re brilliant live, he’s a great performer, and, as far as I’m concerned, a genuinely nice guy.

I met him when the band opened for Cabbage at the O2 Academy. About 15 people stood at the back wall of the small upstairs room, mainly musicians or crew. The others fit into three categories: young men, gagging to tell you their eclectic tastes, young women, teenagers, who are only here for Cabbage and aren’t ready for a band like NoFriendz, and finally, middle-aged men. They, at least, understand the value of what they’re looking at. Or they did until Angus chucked a can and it hit one of them.

Nevertheless, NoFriendz seemed unphased by the lacklustre crowd, giving a tight set, with Angus up to his usual antics. Except obviously they were phased, because it’s shit that no one cared. They should. NoFriendz should be playing to more than 15 people, for more than £50.

The band started as a joint venture with a friend “who couldn’t play drums” on drums, and Angus singing Katy Perry over noise from his guitar. “Now we’re as insignificant as we were when we started” he proclaims, “I’m happy no one’s showed up to see us play – they don’t deserve it!”.

Their debut album, a split with Chupa Cabra released on Trashmouth, is all Angus’ work, and tonight, he believes the band have never sounded better. He asks me for any footage to see how much of a “twat” he looked. At one point he’d fallen offstage, taking a monitor with him – fairly toned-down behaviour for the band, but a shock to the O2.

Afterwards Angus tells me what NoFriendz are up to. “Throwing cans at people. Being the worst support act possible. Just trying to stay together, I guess”. The lads have gone through 10 different members in the past year. Angus believes he’s “quite hard to get on with”.

As their song ‘Ballad’ puts it, they’re a mess. But it’s a good mess, a mess that makes incredible music and speaks for that voice we all have, the one that says, “you’re shit and so is everyone else”. We ignore it, but NoFriendz don’t. They’ve got no concrete recording plans for the future but will do something soon, after all “there’s no point fucking stopping now”. Each gig gets better, “unless I get my knob out again, that’s terrible”.

“Show up next time Oxford, you bastards… kiss my ass. You don’t deserve NoFriendz” are Angus’ final remarks. It’s hard not to agree with him. If you don’t show up you won’t know what you’re missing, and it might not always be around to see.

Students win £10,000 prize for using artificial intelligence cancer diagnosis kit

0

A team of five students have come first in the Oxford Foundry’s All-Innovate Competition, winning a prize of £10,000 for developing a new cancer diagnosis platform.

DECancer.AI artificial intelligence detects early cancer through analysis of an affordable blood test and the patient’s medical history, allowing for early treatment and care and increasing the chances of the cancer being cured.

The All-Innovate competition is the first business idea competition held at the University of Oxford, engaging over 200 students from 21 colleges. Each college selected their best teams to go forward to a one-day boot camp. There was also a series of 24 workshops organised by the Foundry, focused on delivering and implementing ideas.

Member of the winning team and DPhil student in Clinical Medicine, Peter Liu, told Cherwell: “The Oxford Foundry provided a fast-paced and multi-disciplinary learning experience on innovation and entrepreneurship through the All-Innovate Idea Competition.

“From the Saturday boot camp for shortlisted teams to the week-long boot camp for finalists, focusing on public speaking, delivering pitches, and implementing ideas, we were challenged to think critically about our start-up and tangible steps to move it forward.”

When asked about the diagnostic platform, Peter Liu told Cherwell: “Cancers with the highest mortality in the world are often diagnosed too late, and early diagnosis saves lives and money for healthcare systems.

“Unfortunately, current diagnostics, including invasive tissue biopsy and complex imagining, cannot detect cancers early. Liquid biopsy offers a solution; it is a blood test that detects cancer materials shed into the blood.”

“DECancer.AI is an artificial intelligence based platform that analyses multi-dimensional liquid biopsy results and personalised patient medical history to detect cancer early.”

By detecting cancers early, the platform would “enable effective cancer treatment at the earliest stage,” Liu explained.

Liu told Cherwell that the team “hopes to do their part in the fight against cancer, providing hope for patients and their families.”

The competition offered two other prizes, for the best undergraduate and postgraduate teams, worth £5,000 each.

August’s Here Already

The idea of bringing together musicians, producers and composers inspires us to imagine the possible musical creations they would devise. August Greene, (lyricist extraordinaire Common, genre defying pianist Robert Glasper, and jazz drumming titan Karriem Riggins), brings this chimera to reality. The A-List hip-hop band and their eponymously titled debut record delivers a wealth of well-seasoned, head-bopping tracks.

The brainchild of Common, August Greene was formed after frequent collaborations between the musical trio. They draw on their individual accomplishments to assemble an array of evocative vignettes on the African American experience. Common has an extended oeuvre ranging from his Soulquarian era to his Kanye West-produced G.O.O.D. Music, Glasper has spent his entire career flitting between hip-hop and jazz; Riggins, a prolific producer, is famed as much for his own work as he is for his collaborations, ranging from Oscar Peterson to Paul McCartney.

The harmonic and melodic scene is set by Glasper and Riggins. The tracks are flush with gorgeous Steinway-esque harmonic textures, generating images of the isolating, contemplative cityscape of New York. Riggins, with his tight percussive loops, displays a heightened awareness of the mood of each song with their idiomatic sensitivity.

‘Optimistic’ (a Sounds of Blackness cover) is indicative of these nuances, with the trio marrying Brandy’s beautiful vocals and gospel expressions with Glasper’s and Riggins’ instrumentation. Although frustrated with the state of US politics, Common focuses on the experience of African Americans, and ways in which America as a collective can uplift itself.
Optimism and black excellence are central tenets to this ideology, as Common flows through bar after bar, eloquently espousing the cure to the societal ills that have struck America.

With ‘Black Kennedy’, Common discusses the reverence Americans bestow upon political family, conflating it with the nobility of African American identity: “Black Kennedy / royalty with black identity”. Common tells us that the way to codify this conception of African American identity is through collective action, placing himself as the spearhead for this movement and associating himself with another political dignitary, Barack Obama: “We must embark to passion mark the people / Had our first black prez, I’ma be the sequel”. Equally, Glasper’s piano outro connects black Atlantic musical styles with Classical royalty such as Glenn Gould.

Common and co. demonstrate that career longevity does not necessarily entail a commitment to antiquated musical trends. Rather, by concentrating their perspective on the now through a musical lens, all three artists remain as original as ever, responding to the political turmoil that has engulfed the US with musical and lyrical conviction.

Cambridge carnage creators conquer Oxford

Seeking shelter from the sun, I decided to head underground to the musical hub of Cenral Oxford. Descending to the depths of Cellar, I found three bands perfect for future listens.

London indie fourpiece Old Swing were up first. Their studio sound is mirage-like melodies, supporting soft summery vocals. However, in the shoebox-sized Cellar the drums stole the show, giving these guys a grittier edge. Rhythm and lead mixed perfectly, at times feeding us funk, at others sounding like synths, and the bass was infectious. They ended on a song called ‘Time’ – but we wanted them to go on. Already a wellknown crowd-pleaser, a rocked-up rhythm and extended outro sealed the deal on a performance which was both solid and soulful.

Next up were Buckinghamshire threesome SEAFOAM. Kicking things off with ‘Distractions’ it was clear these guys were a well-versed performance powerhouse. Jim Terrill’s vocals cut clearly through reverbed guitars and the rhythm section kept it exciting, playing a set that was tight and thrilling. Again, their music usually sounds like summer days, but tonight proved them men of all seasons. ‘Outside’, the opening track of their debut EP of the same name, is falsetto indie-pop personified, but was immediately followed by the Nirvana-tinged track entitled ‘The End’.

But it wasn’t the end. The guys debuted a few new tracks, all of which hit the mark. At times, they sounded like Mac Demarco, but at half the speed and with double the soul. At other points, they had the bubbling bass of The Growlers. But it was clear from the off that they should stick to the singing, and discard their irritating tendency to add unnecessary spoken word pieces into songs. Why try and be a poet when you’ve nailed being a singer? This was only a minor complaint, however, on a performance which had both strength and depth.

Next, Sports Team took to the stage. These guys are so laid back they’re horizontal (a fact demonstrated by singer Alex Rice’s frequent lying down), but they’re far from lazy. They careered, cranium-first, into the chaotic ‘Camel Crew’, but despite the live madness Alex’s theatrical vocals and the shouted responses from the other bandmembers could be
clearly heard.

The six-piece met while studying at Cambridge and released their debut EP Winter Nets earlier this year. On the music video for their best track, ‘Beverly Rose’, Alex takes the mick – now, live, he takes the mic, wandering into the audience. He is the perfect frontman, cracking jokes between tracks before dancing behind the microphone. This is all countered by a maracas player who maddogged the audience the entire time.

They have variety: ‘Kutcher’ is a fast-paced rocker, ‘Winter Nets’ is indie perfection. It all finished too soon, but ‘Stanton’ is the perfect closer. With its twelve-bar rhythm, fantastic opening lyric, and gradual build to chaotic crescendo, it was no wonder the moshing monsters were out in full force.

By the time the band left the stage and I left Cellar rain was falling. Summer was over, but Sports Team are just beginning. Mind you catch them while you can – I don’t think they’ll be playing in the lower tiers for too long.

Preview: You Are Frogs – ‘toes the line between playfulness and danger’

0

“I’m afraid things are not as they seem.” These words, spoken by Mabel (Tasmin Sandford Smith), reflect much of the mystifying world conjured in Practically Peter’s production of You Are Frogs.

Absurdist theatre is not something we often get to see in Oxford’s student drama scene. This, I feel, is a great shame – some of the most popular comedy we like to consume ventures into the realm of the absurd, with highlights including The Mighty Boosh and Monty Python. Equally, theatre-makers are consistently aware of the legacy of playwrights like Samuel Beckett. As such, Practically Peter’s production of the absurdist dark comedy You Are Frogs comes as a welcome addition to the Hilary term.

You Are Frogs is a fairly new play, first performed at the Edinburgh Fringe in 2018. It focuses on the relationship between two frogs, Garry (Gemma Daubeney) and Mabel. The child-like Garry and Mabel are cooped up in a house and, as a result, have become increasingly isolated. The monotony of their intense relationship becomes disrupted, however, when a metal puppet named Bill (Gregor Roach) comes into the picture, shifting the dynamic forever.

In the scenes I watched during the preview, I was able to witness the section in which Bill is brought into the picture. The relationship of Garry and Mabel, prior to the introduction of the play’s third character, is depicted as playful but also unsatisfying. It is also a relationship that is hard to define – is Garry and Mabel’s relationship that of siblings, or of lovers, or does it also possess parental aspects to it? This instability contributed significantly to the excellently uneasy theatrical experience. Ultimately, the cyclical nature of Garry and Mabel’s dialogue as a pair longs for the disruption that Bill generates with his arrival. In the section I watch, all three actors depict this triangular relationship with a confidence and detail that is commendable. Particularly convincing are the physicalities of the actors – they strike a successful balance between anthropomorphising the characters, through facial expressions, and also, through droopy limbs and odd sitting positions, reminding us that the characters they depict are very much not human.

Despite the constant undertone of unease created by this play, there are also moments of joy and humour. A particularly nice detail is the inclusion of play-dough as one of the primary props used by Garry in the production. The use of music, particularly jazz, is also beguiling. In the preview I witnessed a scene in which Mabel dances, whilst Garry sings along to a soulful song – the two combining to create a mystifying, yet unsettling atmosphere.

It is this line between playfulness and danger that Practically Peter’s You Are Frogs is interested in exploring, and one which I think is intensely relevant to everyday experience. Whilst this play seems to present a peculiar and obscure plot about two fictional frogs, in reality it examines issues that are much closer to home – jealousy, interdependence and triangular relationships. As such, I am reminded of the beauty of the absurd – it allows us to think more deeply about things close to us, with a clarity that, somewhat paradoxically, can only be gained from a distance. I highly recommend you get down to the BT this week to see You Are Frogs, finishing on Saturday.

An Epic Climax to the JCR Football Season

0

The last week of Hilary term saw the conclusion of the college football season, a dramatic-climax for college football as battles for promotion and relegation swung one way and then the other.

The best story of the week undoubtedly emerged from Division One. Just a few weeks ago, Christ Church were in prime position to go up, alongside runaway leaders Pembroke. In fact, they were so confident, that the Christ Church Sports Rep, when reflecting on their loss to New in Cuppers final, remarked that ‘we are looking forward to playing you in the Premiership next year.’ 

It turns out they won’t have to worry about losing to New again next season. St Anne’s, who had been on the tails of Christ Church all year, duly beat them 1-0 on a gloriously sunny day in North Oxford, ensuring that both teams remained in the promotion race going into the last gameweek. 

After Balliol forfeited the points against Anne’s, the pressure was on ‘The House’ to beat Queen’s, who had been in the drop zone all year. Queen’s, however, played a strong side, and Christ Church a weak one. The result? 6-0 to Queen’s. Anne’s were up, Christ Church were not. Karma? You can make up your own mind on that one.

Promotion to the Premier Division of JCR football caps a superb two years for the self-styled ‘MGA’. Back-to-back promotions, unbeaten at home in the league since 2017, plus a Hassan’s Cup victory last season, and a College Futsal League one this year. St Anne’s are once again mixing it with the big boys.

Queen’s not only did St Anne’s a huge favour, but themselves stayed in the division by following up the 6-0 defeat with a 15-0 win over Balliol two days later, ensuring St Hugh’s were to drop down to Division Two instead.

There was also drama in the Premier Division itself. Control of the title race had swung all season between Worcester and St Catz. With Catz having finished their campaign in Week 7, Worcester knew that two wins from their last two games (and nothing less) would ensure they claimed the title. A 2-0 victory against St John’s set up a tantalising game against already-relegated Exeter. David beating Goliath seemed to be theme of the week, though, and Worcester succumbed to a 1-0 home loss, conceded a late penalty. It’s fair to say Premier Division champions St Catz will be sending some flowers to Turl Street.

In Division Two, St Peter’s snatched the title on the last day, a 6-1 win over Keble ensuring that they pipped Hertford to the league on goal difference. In Division Three, Brasenose and Trinity celebrated promotion. 

A captivating, memorable and (for some) sickening end to another great season of JCR football. We go again next year.

Ex-cricketer leaves students outraged with ‘sexist’ speech at Brasenose Sports Dinner

0

Students have expressed outrage following Brasenose’s annual Sports Dinner, held on Thursday 28 February, after the speaker, ex-cricketer Don Topley, allegedly read out a “inappropriate and misogynistic” poem.

The poem that Topley is reported to have read is titled ‘Never Trust a Cricketer’. The entire poem can be found here. (The website requires that visitors be 18+.)

One couplet reads: “Then there’s the real stonewaller, girls, he knows what he’s about; and if you let him settle in, its hard to get him out!”

One Brasenose student in attendance, Sophie Brookes, told Cherwell: “[Topley] asked the audience if we knew what sport is currently the fastest growing in popularity – ‘girl’s cricket.’ Then, without any further comment, he goes on to read the poem.

 “A few girls walked out halfway through because they felt so uncomfortable. The whole experience was worsened by his rambunctious way of speaking and the unashamed expressiveness and pride with which he read his poem.”

Another student said: “I walked out with a few friends and we only came back when he was finished. As we all left, there seemed a general consensus that the poem had been in very poor taste. Lots of the women there felt their achievements undermined, and lots of the men felt very embarrassed that [Topley] was representing sports.”

Topley was reportedly invited to speak by a Brasenose JCR member who was an alumnus of the same secondary school as the sportsman. The JCR Sports Representative told Cherwell: “The speech was meant to be on his sporting experiences and career, I didn’t know about the poem until it happened.

“I apologise if anyone was offended by the content of the speech, it was never my intention and at Brasenose we would never support misogynistic behaviour under any circumstance.”

It is believed that no college members were aware of the contents of the speech. Cherwell has contacted Brasenose for comment.

On this matter, Sophie Brookes stated: “It does worry me that the speech wasn’t read by someone before. That said, clearly no one anticipated this and the speaker is in no way a reflection of attitudes within the college.”

Another Brasenose student present at the dinner, Maya Misra, told Cherwell: “It’s not an issue in the sense that Brasenose condoned it but that there wasn’t a vetting process and it speaks to the laddish sports culture that still exists.”

She described the Principal of the college, John Bowers, who was at the dinner, as looking “so uncomfortable”.

Dan Topley told Cherwell that he is unaware of any allegations that have been made against him.