Tuesday 22nd July 2025
Blog Page 721

Quarter of JCRs have transgender rep

0

Over a quarter of Oxford’s undergraduate colleges now have a transgender representative on their JCR committee.

Queen’s College became the eighth to introduce the position this week, joining St Hugh’s, Magdalen, Lady Margaret Hall, Jesus, St John’s, Wadham, and St Hilda’s. Wadham SU was the first to introduce a trans rep, in the 2016-17 academic year.

The motion at Queen’s used statistics from the SU’s LGBTQ+ Campaign’s recent survey of transgender students at the University. The survey revealed that 98% of trans students at Oxford have experienced mental health issues, that over 60% say they have experienced transphobia, that half have self-harmed, and that one third have considered suicide.

The motion, proposed by Quin O’Sullivan and seconded by Alice Shepherd, said that “there are issues the transgender community face in the wider world and in university life which an LGBTQ+ rep may not be able to fully provide for.”

O’Sullivan and Shepherd said they hoped the creation of the role would help trans students “feel more comfortable and confident” while studying at Queen’s.

Earlier this academic year, Oxford SU VP Women, Katy Haigh, said: “It is great to see that common rooms are expanding their representative positions to better reflect the demographics and the needs of their students.”

All but two of Oxford’s undergraduate colleges also have an LGBTQ+ rep on their JCR committee: Brasenose and Trinity are the two exceptions. Both colleges have an Equalities Rep, whose constitutional role includes provision for LGBTQ+ students.

According to the University’s Equality Policy, Oxford attempts to create an environment which “promotes equality, values diversity and maintains a working, learning and social environment in which the rights and dignity of all its staff and students are respected.”

Oxford says it “aims to anticipate and respond positively to the needs of trans and gender variant students, staff and alumni, enabling all members of the University to feel welcome,
safe, valued and supported in achieving their potential and contributing as a member of the University.”

Official policy also notes: “Students and staff come to Oxford from countries round the world, with very different approaches to transgender issues.

“Gender identity interacts with other areas of identity, including ethnicity, culture, religion and disability, and this may sometimes lead to particular issues for individuals, or cause tensions.”

Oxford SU meeting disrupted by anti-abortion protester

0

An Oxford SU meeting was disrupted last night as an individual attempted to display “distressing content” to the assembled students.

Cherwell understands that the disruption occurred as the SU was in the process of renewing its pro-choice policy.

The individual shouted, trying and failing to instigate a mass exodus, while also displaying graphic pictures of foetuses.

In a mass email, Oxford SU told students: “Some of you may be aware that an incident took place at last night’s student council. An individual student seriously disrupted Council and attempted to display distressing content to the rest of Student Council’s members. This behaviour was deemed unacceptable by the Chair and the individual was therefore removed from the meeting by a member of Oxford SU staff.

“In the interest of ensuring our student members are not affected further by this incident, we have made the decision to remove the imagery of the incident from the recording of Student Council, though it is still referenced in the minutes.”

“We would like to offer our support to students who were in attendance at council who were adversely affected by the incident, and encourage you to seek support through our independent advice service.”

“We have received an apology on behalf of the common room the student is a member of. They have assured Oxford SU that the individual student’s actions are not representative of the common room, and that actions are being taken within the college to hold this individual to account for their behaviour.”

Catz introduces committee expansion rep

0

St Catherine’s College JCR voted on Sunday night to introduce a committee expansion rep whose role would be to “ensure the committee continues to grow.”

The motion, proposed by George Carew-Jones and seconded by James Winder, passed with 38 votes in support. It included the hope for “ultimately every JCR ha[ving] a committee role” and to “rename the ‘JCR Committee’ the ‘JCR’, or rename the ‘JCR’ the ‘JCR Committee’, for matters of harmony.”

In the meeting, Carew-Jones said that JCR committee was big but “not big enough” and that there could even be a “deputy president between president and Vice President.”

Carew-Jones told Cherwell that “the Catz committee has become a lot bigger over the last year, and we thought that under the same rationale there was room for the committee to become even bigger.”

He continued: “It’s not that any of the current committee positions are futile. The motivation was more that we thought there comes a critical mass where so many people are on the committee that everyone may as well be on it.

“I think everyone at the meeting agreed that our vision of every JCR member eventually having some sort of position was inspiring and aspirational.

“The motion will thankfully be enshrined in the constitution, but sadly both of us are graduating from the JCR so someone else will have to take the responsibility on. At least we can graduate confident that our legacy has been assured.”

The JCR committee for 2017 to 2018 has 20 members.

Universities minister repeats call for ‘sanctions’ over access data

0

Universities minister Sam Gyimah has threatened Oxford that it may face sanctions over access inequality, as the fall-out from the university’s first-ever undergraduate admissions reports continues.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Gyimah said that “very hard levers” were available to the new Office for Students if the University’s admissions statistics did not improve.

Gyimah, who was elected as president of the Oxford Union in 1997, also called for Oxbridge to make more use of ‘contextualised’ admissions.

Gyimah said: “The numbers that we are seeing now disappoint me, and it’s disappointing because it’s been going on for too long.

“Years ago we were having the same debate about Oxford and Cambridge as we are today, and that is very disappointing.

“I don’t think they’re doing enough…It is staggering that we have the best minds in our universities and we still do not know what the best way is when it comes to applications.”

Gyimah, the Conservative MP for East Surrey, stressed that the Universities could face monetary sanctions if they fail to meet targets.

“The new regulator for universities, the Office for Students, has access and participation remits with every university, and they will have stretching targets,” he said.

“They will have to deliver against these targets set by the regulator, who can ultimately fine them.”

Gyimah’s comments come weeks after the Chair of the Education Select Committee, Robert Halfon, called for sanctions if Oxford and Cambridge failed to address their “social justice problem.”

Halfon said: “I would like to see the elite universities properly being held to account for the numbers of disadvantaged students they admit – and the support they receive whilst studying.

“Perhaps we should regard universities as elite only if they are providing a real ladder of opportunity to the disadvantaged. Maybe universities should only be seen as ‘the best’ when they lead their students to well-paid job destinations and reduce Britain’s skills deficit.

“The new Office for Students must lead in this. There must be sanctions from the new regulator for those universities who are failing in this regard.”

In March, the Higher Education Standards Agency (Hesa) revealed that Oxford accepted fewer applications from poor neighbourhoods in the 2017-18 academic year than any other mainstream institution.

Just 2.8% of the University’s intake were from students who live in areas classified as the most difficult to engage in higher education.

Gyimah also called for the universities to consider more ‘contextualised’ admissions, after other Russell Group universities including University College London, King’s College London, and York introduced schemes to improve the uptake of disadvantaged students.

Gyimah said: “There are rules to this game, and there are some schools from the age of 12,13, that are schooling their students…so that when they get to A-levels it is part of their DNA.

“If you go to a school where this is not the system at all, you find it very difficult to catch up. You’re quite smart, you’ve got the potential, but there’s no one there to help you.

“What Oxford should be doing is helping those schools who do not have those inbuilt systems, to actually develop those advantages in those schools. If you don’t know those systems, you don’t have a hope of getting through.

“I think it is right that they take into account a broad range of factors, not just the performance in the tests.”

BAME JCR presidents recreate Bullingdon photo

16 current and former BAME JCR presidents and one ball committee president have recreated the infamous 1988 Bullingdon Club photograph, shot on the Christ Church stairs.

The 2018 photograph, entitled “Presidents of Colour”, was taken with the intention of emphasising Oxford’s progress in terms of diversity and access in recent decades.

Photoshoot organiser and newly-elected Lady Margaret Hall JCR President, Joshua Tulloch, told Cherwell: “The Bullingdon Club is symbolic of the elitism which haunts Oxford University. In staging this photo we want to show that Oxford is no longer just for a white elite. It’s for everyone.”

The photoshoot comes after news that 41% of Oxford colleges with JCRs will have a BAME JCR president next term.

According to Tulloch, nine BAME students were elected this term as JCR president for the upcoming academic year, while four BAME students currently hold JCR presidencies until Hilary next year. This means that a total of 13 BAME students will hold JCR presidencies for the first term of next year, and at least nine students following that.

This represents nearly half of JCR presidencies across the 31 Oxford colleges that have JCRs.

The new JCR presidents at Worcester and New College, Ephraim Conteh and Kendya Goodman respectively, are each one of the two black students admitted to their respective colleges in the past two years.

A joint statement sent to Cherwell, signed by 20 current and former BAME JCR presidents, stated: “We hope that it signals the beginning of real and meaningful change for BAME students at Oxford.”

It continued: “Our election has been exceptional, but such positive representation is unlikely to continue without wholesale self-reflection on both a personal and institutional level from all members of the University, and an active, pronounced commitment from staff and students to making Oxford a safe and inclusive environment for all University members, irrespective of their race or ethnicity.”

“The difficulties BAME applicants face in getting a place at Oxford and the representation of Black and minority ethnic students among the body of JCR Presidents are two separate issues which should not be conflated, so as not to use the latter to undermine the urgency and importance of the former.

“It is intellectually dishonest to reduce the issues BAME students face at Oxford to a matter of access, as if once they arrive they are no longer imperilled by prejudice. Racism and discrimination are still significant problems within the student body which must be addressed if we are to transform Oxford into a genuinely welcoming environment for BME students.

“Ultimately, we want our presence as JCR Presidents and this campaign to show any BAME sixth formers thinking of applying to Oxford that there is a place for you here, that Oxford is changing, and that you too can thrive here.”

The newly elected presidents plan to work with the University and the SU “to ensure that our election is not perfunctory, but rather that it has genuine and positive consequences for BAME students at Oxford, and for any potential applicants.”

To this day, the Bullingdon Club remains an invitation-only, all-male, and traditionally all-white drinking society. Its wealthy members are renowned for their extravagant banquets and destructive behaviour.

The 1988 photograph became a symbol of Oxford’s entrenched elitism when it went public in 2010. Two of the posing members, Boris Johnson and David Cameron, were Mayor of London and Prime Minister respectively at the time of release.

The following statement accompanies the BAME presidents’ photograph.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then what can these two pictures tell?

In 1987, a photograph was taken. A photograph which embodied a world of inherited privilege, the excesses of elitism, and the exclusive structure of social and political power. An image that does not accurately reflect our view of contemporary British society.

In 2018, we took a different photograph. A photograph which represents the victories borne out of an ongoing struggle, the opening of doors once firmly closed, and the growing commitment to diversity in the halls of power. It is an image that, we hope, signifies how far this institution has come in the intervening years, and anticipates the future progress yet to be made.

BAME individuals comprise 41% of the 2018/19 cohort of JCR Presidents, despite only making up 17.9% of the UK-domiciled student population. We stand as testament to the individual and institutional recognition that diversity is not just inevitable, but also powerful and beneficial. It is evident from student-led access initiatives such as the Afro-Caribbean Tyler Prize and the African and Caribbean Society’s Access Programmes that there is a real, popular desire to effect structural changes in Oxford, and the results of the latest round of JCR elections – in which nine BAME presidents were elected – only serve to embolden our endeavour.

The progress that we’ve made – as embodied by the changing faces of student leaders – is indeed heartening. But this by no means exonerates Oxford; it is still responsible for perpetuating structural inequalities. Nor does this absolve the education system of its role in systematically disadvantaging BAME and lower socioeconomic background individuals in their attempts to access a world-class education.

However, we hope to show that, despite pervasive narratives, you too can be included in a space once defined by exclusion. Though we are few, our ambition is uninhibited; our drive, unsequestered; our aspirations, unrestrained.

As Presidents of Colour, we represent how it is possible to thrive at Oxford. We show that if we are allowed to approach these dreaming spires, then we will climb to the very top. May the halls of power – once grey – be filled evermore with colour, diversity, and culture.

#PresidentsOfColour

Oxford eight joins Wasps rugby academy

0

Blues eight Will Wilson has joined the Wasps rugby academy, after a successful run out with the England sevens team in April.

Wilson, a finalist historian at Keble, has appeared in two Varsity matches and made a number of A League appearances for Wasps during a previous spell with the outfit.

He has impressed at both university and international level this year, converting for the Blues in the Varsity match and scoring for the national side at this year’s Hong Kong sevens.

He told Cherwell that: “Being approached by Wasps came as a bolt from the blue, but it was ultimately an opportunity I couldn’t pass up.

“I’m really excited to test myself against some of the very best in the country (and indeed the world), and can’t wait to get stuck into training and playing for the academy side. Hopefully this will perform as a platform for bigger and better things to come!”

He joins the academy alongside 20-year-old winger Callum Sirker. Wasps academy manager Jonathan Pendlebury said: “It is great to be able to add two talented players like Callum and Will to our Senior Academy squad for next season. They have both flourished in their time away from the club and we cannot wait to have them back in the Wasps setup.”

“Adding Callum and Will means we will have a larger 14-man Senior Academy squad next season, which will enable us to play a fuller role in first team training as an academy group. The pair, along with other senior academy players will have early opportunities to impress in the Premiership Rugby 7s and the pre-season development XV fixture vs Coventry ahead of the season.”

Wilson has plenty of experience at a high level, having previously captained an England U18 tour to Samoa and won three Blues for Oxford. He played at flanker in the Oxford side that won 12-6 in 2015, and started at eight in the 2016 and 2017 defeats, scoring a try in the latter.

Uni ‘encouraged’ by Home Office’s commitment to review overseas student policy

0

Oxford University have said they are “encouraged by the Home Secretary’s comments” regarding a reassessment of the inclusion of overseas students in net migration figures.

Earlier this week, Home Secretary Sajid Javid said that he would “like to look at again” the policy that includes international students within the government’s drive to reduce net migration into the UK, admitting that he did “empathise” with the view that it did not give a welcoming impression.

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Oxford has always maintained that the very best international universities are those that are able to attract and recruit the very best students, wherever they come from.

“We have lobbied the government not to enact policies that will be detrimental to world-class universities.  We are encouraged by the Home Secretary’s comments this week and look forward to hearing more detail from him.”

General secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), Sally Hunt, said it was “encouraging” that Javid “appears to recognise how unwelcoming our current policy is”.

“However, we need that policy looked at again as a priority,” she added. “Our universities’ international student recruitment is a huge success story because overseas students are attracted by the quality of higher education available. International students make an enormous contribution to UK higher education both educationally and economically.

“Sajid Javid should take the lead on this and support universities by committing to remove international students from the net migration target altogether.”

Universities UK (UUK), the representative organisation for the UK’s universities, also welcomed Mr Javid’s comments. A spokesperson said: “Removing students from the net migration target would be a positive policy change as part of a package of measures to signal that the UK is a welcoming destination for international students. We welcome the home secretary’s commitment to review this issue.”

Hollie Chandler, senior policy analyst at the Russell Group, added that while “there is no limit on the number of international students who can come to the UK, including them in the target is unhelpful and sends the wrong message to prospective students abroad”.

Oxford’s Migration Observatory has published research showing that the majority of the public tend not to think of students when they think about migration, despite students representing the largest group of migrants coming to the UK.

Pedestrian hit by bus on High Street

0

A woman has been taken to hospital after a bus crash on Magdalen Bridge around 3pm today.

Cherwell understands she was rushed to John Radcliffe Hospital in a serious condition.

Police closed the bridge, causing considerable traffic delays and disruption to the bus timetable.

Oxford Bus Company has admitted that one of its buses was involved in the incident. Spokesman Greig Box Turnbull told the Oxford Mail: “We can confirm one of our City3 buses was involved in an incident with a female pedestrian on Magdalen Bridge at 2.15pm.

“An investigation will be carried out to understand how it happened. We are liaising with the emergency services and will help in any way we can, this will include reviewing our CCTV footage. Our thoughts are with the lady who was taken to hospital and our driver.”

Oxford beats Cambridge in QS uni rankings

0

Oxford has beaten Cambridge in the 2019 QS World University Rankings, placing among the top five universities worldwide.

According to the rankings, Oxford is the UK’s best university and the 5th best university globally. It is the first time since 2015 that Oxford has ranked in the top five institutions globally.

Oxford and Cambridge have swapped positions in the rankings this year, with Oxford rising from 6th place to 5th and Cambridge dropping from 5th to 6th.

US universities retain the top four positions; MIT topped the table followed by Stanford, Harvard, and CalTech respectively.

QS ranks the world’s top 1,000 universities, which typically come from over 85 countries.

Oxford’s rise is mostly due to an improvement in its research performance. Its score for Citations per Faculty – QS’s measure of research impact – rose from 76.3/100 in last year’s edition to 83.0/100 this year. It also retained a score of 100/100 for Employer Reputation.

QS World University Rankings 2019: Top 10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Stanford University
Harvard University
California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
Imperial College London
University of Chicago
UCL (University College London)

 

Oxford vice chancellor, Louise Richardson, said: “I am delighted that Oxford has risen in this year’s QS rankings. We owe this result to the talent and commitment of our academic staff and to our network of research collaborators across the continent and across the Globe. We are particularly proud to have secured the top spot in Europe and very much hope that we will be able to maintain this position as the UK withdraws from the European Union.”

A QS spokesperson, Jack Moran, said: “This year’s results reiterate Oxford’s status as a truly world-class institution in all respects. It enjoys outstanding renown among both academics and employers.

“Its highly international status is testament to its global standing. And no university in the country achieves a higher raw research impact, with its citations footprint higher than all others.

“However, for students at the university, it is equally important that the world-renowned tutorial system remains facilitated by one of the world’s lowest faculty-student ratios: in this respect, Oxford is relatively – and happily – anomalous among UK institutions, the majority of whom are suffering from increasing class sizes.”

Oxford’s Bronze Award for Racial Diversity is an undeserved accolade

0

Oxford University draws scrutiny much like a summer picnic draws wasps: it is almost inevitable but is nonetheless somewhat disruptive. A particularly popular topic for criticism of Oxford is diversity, and at this point you could probably measure the passing of time in the number of scandals, reports, or initiatives that relate to this important issue. None of them change how I think about the application process, and none of them seem to say anything that we did not already know. Frankly, I’m growing sick of reading about them. Letting reports, awards and enraged news stories lead the discourse on diversity only hinders any actual progress. Yet, the latest addition to the deluge of discussion on Oxford’s access problem seems rather more optimistic than much of what has come before it: Oxford has been given a Bronze Award for Racial Diversity from Advance HE.

When I first read this I was a bit confused. Just reading the title ‘Bronze Award for Racial Diversity’ evoked images of participation awards that the more athletically inept among us would be given at our primary school sports days. Well-meaning as I am sure it was, it is hard to see what this sort of tokenistic pat on the head is really doing for the thousands of young people that miss out because of the social system that fails them.

The constant reports only compound the issue: we all know that there is a problem, and re-emphasising it does not promote progress. Statistics can be pulled in and out of focus to suit the writer. My own college sent a laughably self-congratulatory email with a bullet point list of the supposed advancements in diversification they had unearthed in the latest report, but one only needs to scan a copy of any student paper to realise that this is not the full story. Such reports frequently weaponise student experiences and narrowly define groups of Oxford students on the basis of their demographics and backgrounds. When we place such emphasis on categorisation and quantification of marginalisation, we burden such groups with the full weight of the baggage that they are deemed to be carrying. Essentially what we are seeing seeping out of these statistical cesspits is identity politics transposed onto Oxford admissions.

Furthermore, the kind of narratives that are extracted from statistics are generally more for convenience than accuracy. One I have read a lot over the past week is that if we make the application system meritocratic then the problems will dissolve: the proponents of this narrative are sorely mistaken. What they fail to recognise is that due to hours of preparation, years of superior teaching, and a more rigorous focus on soft skills, candidates from more affluent backgroundsarebetter at the tasks of the application process so decontextualised meritocracy will not help. The problem is not that the system is biased at the point at which students meet it, but that long before Oxford was even on the horizons for most students, the quality of education being provided was inadequate. These reports place a magnifying glass over Oxford, when Oxford in itself is a minute part of a systemic problem. Such reports shift a disproportionate proportion of the burden for solving the diversity issue onto an institution that in many ways simply cannot.

I am not arguing that we should never investigate diversity, and I am not arguing that efforts to solve the problem are futile. Simply, it is clear that number crunching is producing and reinforcing unhelpful paradigms of thought about Oxford admissions and education as a whole. These reports can say pretty much what you want them to if you spend long enough tinkering with the numbers. They have their place, but we should not let them dominate the way that we talk about diversity at our university and in our society. If we care about the diversity issue in our university, then as students we should try and get involved at the earliest possible stage to facilitate real opportunity for talented students.