Wednesday 16th July 2025
Blog Page 734

Lets Talk About: Being from the North

0

Ask anyone from my college where I am from and they will immediately say ‘Doncaster’ or ‘the North’. This is partially down to my exceptionally strong accent, but also because I will not stop talking about my Northern roots. I have even tried, although admittedly half-heartedly, to start a Balliol ‘Northerners’ society’, although this does largely consist of me nostalgically posting pictures of Greggs in a Facebook group chat.

I have gradually discovered more differences between the North and South since coming to Oxford. At first my only real concern was the price of alcohol, after hearing repeated warnings from by Dad that I’ll ‘pay six quid for a pint down there’. This was certainly proven right in some places (*cough* the Bully). Fortunately, the cheap prices at Baliol bar were somewhat reminiscent of the £1 pints I could buy from my local on a Friday.

The price wasn’t the only difference I found when it came to booze down South. The drinking culture was also very different. I remember my close friend from London saying how she had been surprised at how much people drink in Oxford, and how she didn’t expect people to go out so often. Truth be told, in comparison to home it seemed a bit tame. Yes, when you consider the Oxford workload, students here as a whole do go out fairly frequently. The different lies in how much they drink. At home its quite common to see ambulances and police cars lining the streets on a Friday night, not to mention the numerous fights that erupt on the dancefloor. Going out in Oxford may not be ideal, though at least I can let my hair down without fear of having a drink thrown over it

People in Oxford are of course friendly. They are not ‘start up a conversation in the queue for the self-service checkout’ friendly however. This would be completely normal in the North, where I would probably find it strange if someone didn’t even say ‘hello’. As it would be to use affectionate and endearing names like ‘love’, ‘darling’ and ‘sweet’. If I was called any of these walking down Turl Street I would find it very strange. Obviously, I do have a narrow perception of the South, having only spent time in London or Oxford. From what I have heard from friends in small towns and villages in the South they are just as friendly as home. There is something about the welcoming attitudes of the bigger Northern cities like the exotic Manchester I miss though.

In contrast, the diversity and acceptance that I see in London and Oxford are truly refreshing. I recall being sat in a politics lecture where we were shown a graph of Brexit votes and the number of foreign-born people in certain cities and towns. Doncaster was right at the top- a town with the smallest number of foreign-born people and with nearly the highest rate of Leave voters. This is not surprising, there is a lack of diversity in Doncaster. I find it hard to accept the intolerance I see there, though also in the North more widely, especially when going home after spending months in Oxford. Of course I know nowhere is perfect, but I do feel that in this sense, Oxford is friendlier and more open and welcoming to people from different walks of life.

Missing home is inevitable, but I have come to embrace the South. I have learnt to love the best of both world. Cheesy chip wraps are now (unofficially) on the Hassan’s menu, my friends now know what ‘mardy’ means and I’ve acclimatised to the slightly warmer temperatures (who knows, I may een get a tan). Though arguably most importantly, I have given in to my love of Pret.

 

Letter To: That Library Twat

I have finally grown the balls to confront you on your twattiness, an issue that has been concerning me since my arrival in Oxford. I’ll put it simply for the sake of clarity, and in case you can’t hear me over your vigorous tapping, incessant sneezing or loud chatter – you are the most annoying person in the library. In fact, I’d go as far to say that your presence lowers collective productivity in whatever building you’re in.

Your arrival in the library is more similar to that of the Queen at some royal engagement than of a student desperately trying to complete an essay. You stop at regular intervals to wave at someone you’ve been meaning to catch up with. But then this ‘catch up’ turns into a fully blown conversation about one another’s lives and the life of your friends’ sister’s dog’s. I’m all for having a cosy chat, but not in a library, where your cosy chat is ruining the life of others. If I fail this year I know who I’m blaming. You finally manage to find a seat, and what a struggle that was. Even before you found your long-lost friend, you had already managed to push a pull door, trip over the carpet, and nearly fall of a ladder searching for a book. Honestly, if you can’t make it to the library without all these incidents, is it really worth trying?

So, your laptop is out, it looks like you’re finally about to begin some actual work. But, no, next to your power point on romantic literature is a Facebook tab. And an Instagram one. Undoubtedly, you have half a dozen or more Facebook messages to respond to, and of course Instagram content to like, but also to curate. The intensity of your typing in response to a brief ‘are you going for dinner in hall?’ message is something of a shock. In the silence of the library, the sound of you vigorously bashing away resonates throughout the room. I’m pretty sure laptops don’t have any formal rights, but I’m sorry that yours has to contend with such malicious abuse on a daily basis. Unfortunately, it’s pretty hard to upload photos from a laptop, and so your phone isn’t immune from this treatment, and nor are the rest of us. Soon enough you’re trying to get the ‘perfect’ photo of the library that you could’ve more easily found online (and without disturbing other people).

Besides tapping, you also make a vast array of other noises, that never fail to amaze (annoy) me. The one I personally find most irritating is clicking. Are these finger exercises really necessary in a public space, particularly a library? Sneezing and blowing your nose I can forgive; no one decides to be ill by choice. But when you spend the entire time sniffing, I find it hard not to become irritated. I may be a bit sensitive, easily irritable and slightly desperate to find any distraction from my essay, but this doesn’t warrant you making these odd noises. Please stop. And, if you can’t stop, please leave.

An American Nightmare

0

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) opens with a confession: “The year I turned 26, I made 49 million dollars, which really pissed me off because it was three shy of a million a week”. It’s our first introduction to Jordan Belfort, a high-powered, high-energy stockbroker based on a real-life banker convicted of financial fraud in 1999. The brashness of that opening statement is perhaps only rivalled by Henry Hill’s confession in Goodfellas (1990): “As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster.”

Just like Henry Hill, Leonardo DiCaprio’s initially innocent Jordan Belfort throws himself to the wolves, descending into unapologetic hedonism and debauchery. His first day on Wall Street sees him swallowed up and spat out on Black Monday of 1987, the day global stock markets plunged. However, he goes on to flog worthless ‘penny stocks’ at a sleepy Long Island dealership, allowing him to accumulate a small fortune in a short space of time. Eventually, he forms his own brokerage firm with his neighbour, Donny Azoff, played by Jonah Hill.

Like Fitzgerald’s Gatsby, Belfort recognizes the importance of image. He chooses to call the firm that he founds ‘Stratton Oakmont’ in an attempt to suggest solidity, responsibility and staunch values. But this respectability is only skin-deep: the atmosphere at Stratton Oakmount is similar to that of a degenerate frat-house, complete with hookers, hazing and a Friday dwarf-throwing competition.

Belfort encourages every excess, spending money as quickly as he earns it and engaging in outrageous antics. He becomes addicted to an exotic mixture of “cocaine, Quaaludes, Xanax, Paxil, uppers, downers, all-rounders”, acquires a wrinkled Ferrari and buys a yacht that capsizes somewhere in the Mediterranean during a storm of epic proportions.

Belfort’s business involves peddling questionable stocks to gullible investors in order to line his own pockets. Like Gordan Gekko in Wall Street (1987), he confidently believes that greed is good. He’s supported by a plethora of unctuous salesmen who resemble David Mamet’s desperate and unscrupulous realtors in Glengarry Glen Ross (1984). These disciples are taught to do whatever it takes to close the deal – they are encouraged to threaten, coerce or outright deceive investors to make a sale. Belfort and his staff engage in all manner of illegal and unscrupulous activity, selling clients worthless stocks, charging extortionate commissions and manipulating stock-market prices. In real life, thousands of small investors were conned out of their life savings by Stratton Oakmont. And yet the only victims in The Wolf of Wall Street are Belfort and his sidekick Danny Azoff, who are both sent to prison.

The ‘Wolf of Wall Street’, as Forbes first dubbed him in 1991, seems remarkably harmless in the film. All that we see on screen is a drug-addled buffoon making money and then blowing it on drugs, parties, and sex. The other side of the story – the very real suffering that his actions caused – is almost entirely obscured by Belfort’s bacchanalian antics. The victims are whitewashed out of the picture.

Yet Scorsese shouldn’t be accused of glorifying Belfort’s lifestyle. He doesn’t show the human impact of Belfort’s financial scams but that isn’t what he wants to do. Instead, his aim is to demonstrate how easy it is to tacitly condone morally unscrupulous activity. In the final scene, the camera pans up over the audience listening to a motivational speech delivered by Jordan Belfort, hovering over a sea of desperate and awe-filled faces. This shot holds up a mirror to the film’s audience. We are essentially watching a slightly different version of the speech that Belfort is giving – one that contains more of the sordid details but is just as saccharine.

It brings to mind Oliver Stone’s observation, made while promoting Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010), that “Villains sometimes tend to rise above their role in life. They become heroes or anti-heroes. We lost our bearings in America, we’re living way beyond our means and people began to worship the idea of excess.” Belfort is one such villain.

We all know that Belfort’s behavior is bad and yet, as the final scene shows, many of us don’t care. We’re still willing to watch him ruin lives on screen or buy his autobiography, which was a bestseller on both sides of the Atlantic. In that final scene, it becomes clear that we too have been sucked in by Belfort’s manipulative charm. The film demonstrates to us just why Belfort was so successful – he had glamour, charm, and confidence. The film, really, is a confidence trick of sorts. It reels us in slowly and makes us admire a deeply unpleasant man. The effect is unsettling and a true demonstration of Scorsese’s artistry.

Films can do two things. They can teach audiences how to live or they can depict human nature frankly and vividly. The Wolf of Wall Street chooses the second of these paths. It’s a romanticized portrait of an unpleasant person that perfectly illustrates the essential amorality of many humans. The film shows us how easy it is to succumb to greed – and how simple it is to con people out of their money. The Wolf of Wall Street is three hours of people saying ‘fuck’, exchanging bodily fluids, and screwing over innocent people. And we can’t look away.

Failings revealed in case of Oxford student whose rape trial was dropped

0

An Oxford student who faced allegations of rape spent two years on bail because police were preoccupied with reports concerning allegations against Jimmy Savile, a new report has revealed.

Oliver Mears, 19, a chemistry undergraduate at St. Hugh’s College, was to face a jury in January. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) dropped the case just days before the trial was due to begin on the grounds there was insufficient evidence.

One explanatory letter passed to the trial judge said that Surrey Police had not passed an evidence file to the CPS until May 2017. This was almost two years after the alleged rape took place, at a house party in the summer of 2015.

Mears, of Horley in Surrey, was not charged until June 2017.

The letter, written by a senior crown prosecutor to trial judge Jonathan Black at Guildford Crown Court, read: “Surrey Police have accepted that the investigation was protracted and subject to various delays.

“The delay in the investigation was as a result of the rapid rise in complaints being made to the Surrey Police force post Savile.”

This report to the court, delivered in February, also noted: “I fully accept that this case was not properly handled from the beginning and acknowledge the distress and impact that the proceedings and the late decision not to proceed have had on both the defendant and the complainant which cannot be underestimated.”

The letter, obtained via a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by Get Surrey, showed that despite the alleged victim writing a diary, only one of her pages was shared with defence lawyers. When the full copy was provided on 15th January it “served to weaken the case further”.

The letter also said: “Having analysed the case and the material upon which the decision to charge was made, I am of the opinion that this case was charged too early.

“It was apparent from the initial material supplied by Surrey Police that Facebook messaging and other communications over social media had relevance to the case.

“These had been exhibited within the statements of the witnesses and so were clearly available.”

The letter admitted that the prosecutor in charge of authorising the charges against Mears should have looked into potentially relevant Facebook messages further.

The same report showed that when the case was reviewed on 5th January 2018, the reviewing lawyers concluded there was “insufficient evidence” to proceed.

The crown prosecutor said: “I took the view that the case should not have been charged due to there being insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.

“The information contained in the diary and the confirmation that Surrey Police had failed to seize the digital devices of the complainant and the resultant impact that had on the integrity of the police investigation only served to confirm this view.”

After the case collapsed, judge Jonathan Black had demanded a detailed explanation as to failings in the investigation.

Mears voluntarily suspended his studies. St. Hugh’s said he would be welcomed back.

A spokesperson for the college said: “It was the student’s choice to suspend his studies. Students who suspend their studies can make the choice whether to come back or not.”

This article has been updated to remove phrasing that we considered inappropriate. We apologise for any distress caused by the original reporting, and will be updating our internal style guide with advice from sexual assault campaigns to prevent similar problems arising in future.

Oxford denies alleged new eSport offerings

0

Despite a “widely reported” partnership between Chinese media giant Tencent and Oxford University, there are no plans to introduce esport courses at Oxford, a University spokesperson has told Cherwell.

Several gaming news sites, including Esports Insider and Dot eSports, have reported that Oxford intends to include new courses on eSports. Reuters has also mentioned the courses.

The courses were allegedly part of a “broad cultural deal” Tencent signed with the UK.

At an event announcing the deal in London in early May, Britain’s Secretary of State for International Trade, Liam Fox, said: “The next few years offer a golden opportunity for the UK to work with companies such as Tencent to drive innovation and shape the future of global trade.

“We look forward to turning this ambition into a reality.”

Esports Insider subsequently reported that: “University of Oxford will host tournaments and offer courses with a view to increasing the profile of eSports, as well as bringing more talent into it.

“While it’s known that esports courses will be available through the University, [what]exact offerings and topics are yet to be revealed.”

However, an Oxford spokesperson told Cherwell that the University has not discussed creating any eSports courses with Tencent. 

They confirmed that while Tencent has expressed interest in holding an eSports tournament at the University, nothing more has been discussed.

Tencent, a Chinese social media giant worth more than Facebook, recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the UK Department of International Trade.

Tencent runs most of China’s top social media, music, and gaming platforms. Among its products is WeChat, messaging program with over a billion users.

Christ Church votes to fly St George’s flag during World Cup

1

Christ Church JCR has passed a motion to fly the St George’s flag during the upcoming World Cup, despite concerns that the move would be “marginalising” and “a little bit EDL-y”.

The flag will fly in the college’s Peckwater quad for the duration of England’s participation in the tournament, subject to confirmation from the college’s governing body.

The motion passed with 24 votes for, 16 against, and 17 abstentions.

Callum Cleary, who seconded the motion, told Cherwell that the flag “will be a symbol of our backing for Gareth [Southgate] and the boys.”

During Sunday’s General Meeting, students asked if the motion might be considered “a little bit EDL-y”.

In response, the proposers said “all flags are a little bit marginalising. By [that] principle, all flags shouldn’t exist.”

Cleary told Cherwell: “As for marginalising, I think this is a completely legitimate concern. We wish to send Joe Hart and Jack Wilshere our condolences for not making the squad. However, I’m sure a couple more shampoo ads for Joe, and another injury-induced, matchless season (on full pay) for Jack will soften any feelings of exclusion.”

It was also confirmed that the flag will only fly while England are in the tournament – although Cleary suggested that will not entail it coming down early.

“[I] foresee the length of the tournament and England’s participation as synonymous, the only question being whether we beat Brazil or Germany in the final,” he said. “Personally, after we win the World Cup, I wouldn’t put it past Christ Church to leave it up all year round.”

The news comes amid police concerns that the flag might be seen as “imperialistic”.

On Tuesday, the head of football policing, Deputy Chief Constable Mark Roberts, warned England fans travelling to Russia for the tournament to be “really careful” about bringing flags overseas.

“[Waving the flag] can come across as almost imperialistic… and can cause antagonism,” he said.

“We really urge some caution about people putting flags out and waving them about in public.”

In 2012, a national survey found that nearly a quarter of English people (24%) and one-third of under-40s associate the St George’s Cross with racism and extremism.

Only 61% of the English respondents said they associated the flag with pride and patriotism, compared to 84% of Scottish and 86% of Welsh respondents, when asked about the St Andrew’s Cross and the Red Dragon respectively.

Christ Church has been contacted for comment.

College JCRs discuss funding Irish students to vote in referendum

0

Christ Church and Exeter JCRs passed motions on Sunday to fund the travel expenses of Irish students returning home to vote in the 8th Amendment referendum.

Exeter JCR resolved to allocate £220 for returning students’ travel, while Christ Church JCR’s Gender Equalities representative was mandated to lobby the college for funds.

While both motions initially endorsed the repeal of the 8th Amendment, they were amended throughout the respective meetings to include more neutral language.

The minutes of the Christ Church meeting, seen by Cherwell, showed that some students were concerned the motion was “irrelevant”, as there were only two JCR members eligible to receive funding. Other students felt the motion would be too political.

Exeter passed a separate motion in support of the Repeal the 8th campaign, which read: “This common room should oppose any measures which make it more difficult for our student members to choose either to terminate a pregnancy or to carry it to term and to work to ensure that no additional restrictions are imposed at any level so that Oxford students have a real choice.”

The motion passed with 31 votes in favour and two against.

Exeter JCR President, Ellie Milne-Brown, told Cherwell that students aren’t expected to vote to support the Repeal campaign.

She said: “Exeter JCR voted to endorse the campaign to repeal the Eighth Amendment, and voted to provide funds totalling £220 to help Irish students travel home to vote.

“While the JCR supports the repeal of the Amendment and the right of women to choose what happens to their bodies, the travel funds are available to students no matter how they plan to vote.

“We are committed to allowing students to participate in the democratic process with no economic barrier, no matter their political allegiances.”

Former Oxford Students for Life committee member and third-year PPEist, Ben Conroy, told Cherwell: “Though it’s good to see that the money will be available for anyone who wants to fly back, Exeter JCR’s stance is both predictable and unfortunate. It’s sad that they decided to vote against human rights for all humans.”

“I can’t fly home myself, which I’m gutted about: the referendum is right in the middle of my final exams, and I have one on the day of the vote.

“I’d encourage ‘No’ voters who can make it to make use of the funding: this is a once-in-a-generation chance to uphold the idea that no human being should be outside the scope of justice.”

The JCRs’ actions follow Oxford SU’s recent resolution to allocate £500 towards Irish students’ travelling costs.

 

Students hold emergency vigil to honour Palestinians killed in protests

0

Residents and students held an emergency candle-lit vigil outside Balliol College on Tuesday night to pay tribute to the Palestinians killed and wounded in clashes with the Israeli military on Sunday.

Estimates say 58 people were killed and over 2,000 wounded on Sunday, as Israeli troops opened fire during protests in what was the deadliest day of violence in the region since the Israel-Gaza conflict in 2014.

Over 100 students and residents observed the vigil, which fell on the 70th anniversary of the Palestinian exodus of 1948.

Candles were placed onto a map of Palestine drawn on the pavement in chalk, with each candle representing a village which was sacked during the 1948 conflict. The name of each Palestinian killed on Sunday was read out to the crowd, accompanied by speeches and poetry.

The event was organised by Oxford Jewish Students for Justice in Palestine, Oxford Students’ Palestine Society, Oxford SU Campaign for Racial Awareness and Equality (CRAE), Oxford University Amnesty International Society, and the Oxford Islamic Society among others.

The event’s description stated that the vigil was held to “commemorate the seventy years of exile of the Palestinian people from their land, to protest the terrible events in Gaza and commemorate those killed in their struggle for freedom, and to stand for universal human rights, and in solidarity with the Palestinian people’s continued struggle for dignity, equality and the right to return to their homes.”

The name of each Palestinian killed on Sunday was read out to the crowd, accompanied by speeches and poetry. PHOTO: Isaac Mayne

In her speech, SU VP Welfare and Equal Opportunities, Farheen Ahmed, commented on the irony of holding the vigil at the centre of Oxford, “given the University’s history and contributions to the British colonialism and violence ensued across the globe.”

She continued: “However, as students have always done and always will, we stand on the right-side of history and we fight for a free and liberated Palestine.”

Oxford Jewish Students for Justice in Palestine spokesperson, Julia Peck, spoke of the “difficult conversations” Jewish communities are having today as they “see no Jewish future in the systematic oppression of our Palestinian siblings”.

Chairman of Oxford University Amnesty International Society, Ella Cohen-Haddon, praised the union of these varied groups.

She told Cherwell“It was an honour for us [the OUAIS] to be asked to co-host the speaker event earlier today and I look forward to any opportunity to collaborate with these other groups in the coming year to try and encourage an ethical divestment policy to distance the university from the human rights abuses that are being undergone by Palestinians everyday.”

President of Oxford Students’ Palestine Society, Hugo Raine, told Cherwell that he hoped the vigil reminded attendants of Britain’s “key role” in both displacing the people of Palestine and subsequently helping to rehabilitate the population.

After the event, Raine said the number of attendants demonstrated that “the fight for Palestinian rights is something that affects everyone.”

He added: “It is a simple case of a colonial state which is abusing the basic human rights of Palestinian people and breaking international law every day.”

Communications Chair for Islamic Society, Nabeela Zaman, said it was “heartwarming to see so many show their solidarity with Palestine.”

Zaman told Cherwell: “This morning I painted a bleeding Palestinian flag on my face for obvious reasons, because whilst I can’t do much, I think art is a good way to show your support ad starting a conversation which is what’s happened today.

“So many people have asked what flag that is and to be honest, when I heard that, it was really disheartening and my response was ‘you probably know every other flag in the world but not this one but that is exactly why I’ve put it on my face in the first place.'”

The Lonesome West review – ‘a pressure-cooker of rage and almost-erupting violence’

“The white-haired old ghoulish fecking whore. She’s owed me the price of a pint since nineteen-seventy-fecking-seven. It’s always tomorrow with that bitch. I don’t care if she does have Alzheimer’s”.

The intimacy of the Burton Taylor Studio thrusts you instantly into the twisted morality of the Connor home, where patricide is met with shrugs and mild reproach, and a gun is drawn over the disfigurement of some plastic figurines. Martin McDonagh’s The Lonesome West, the last in a blackly comic trilogy set in the fictional Connemara town of Leenane, contains many of his reliably entertaining tropes – a harassed priest, familial hatred, a butchered animal companion – all rendered in comically overblown Hiberno-English. The brothers Coleman (Cameron Forbes) and Valene (Roman Marshall) are joined intermittently by Father Welsh (Celeb Barron) a despondent priest trying to inject some morality into the residents of the “fecking murder capital of Europe”, and the precocious Girleen (Lara Deering), a school-aged poitín-dealer.

The standout performance came from Roman Marshall’s original take on the tight-fisted brother Valene, who lurches terrifyingly from weedy pettiness to moments of grinning menace. His handle on accent and timing is impressive. His oily fussiness works well as a counterpart to Cameron Forbes’ wide-eyed and gormless Coleman, who manages to deliver aggressive misanthropy quite endearingly. The duo’s interactions provide the most pleasing scenes in the play. The supreme effort required by each to have a discussion not erupting into violence is communicated in an uproariously funny way. That the profundity contained in the exaggerated vernacular is also thoughtfully brought forward is a credit to co-directors and producers Joel Stanley and Joe Woodman.

Lara Derring is compelling as soon as she arrives onstage, and delivers a superb performance as the most complex and self-aware character in the play. The adolescent pain of her emotional climax is very moving. Caleb Barron’s turn as the withdrawn and melancholy Father Welsh also provokes a lot of laughter. Idiom proved both the biggest challenge and the greatest help to the production. Where the actors occasionally struggled to get their mouths around the language, a fact which robbed some lines of their full force, the playwright’s genius for comic phrasing was rarely lost, and McDonagh’s excellent dialogue still landed well throughout. It is a shame that dialogue was sometimes rushed when a more measured delivery might have been more effective. However, all of them eased into it as the show went on, a fact which bodes well for the coming performances.

In a play imbued with references to chance, where fraternal squabbling flares up and de-escalates seemingly at random, the tension in the BT rises along with the temperature, not unlike a stove set needlessly to gas mark 10. The decision to forgo an intermission creates a pressure-cooker of rage and almost-erupting violence which comes to an excellent comic climax. Overall, this is a promising debut for Perfectly Peter Productions, and those who come can expect to be highly entertained.

Like A Virgin review – ‘the range of relationship difficulties explored is certainly impressive’

This brand-new play by student writer Sam Moore, directed by Rowan Wilson, exists within a small, bare space, and yet transcends it to resonate with the audience on many emotional levels. Every stage of teenage/young adult relationships from across both the heterosexual and LGBTQ+ spectrum is evoked through subtle and easy conversation between the three characters, as Sarah begins to admit her feelings for Sophie and Emma goes through a difficult break-up. The storyline is simple but evocative; for a 55-minute play, the range of relationship difficulties explored, turned into metaphors, and to some extent resolved, is certainly impressive. Not only are the characters relatable, however, but so is the content of even their more mundane conversations; there was a tangible ripple of recognition in the room as they discussed how they had originally thought Like A Virgin was just part of Moulin Rouge and hadn’t realised that it was in fact originally a very successful song by Madonna.

A few opening-night difficulties beset the production. Unfortunately, many prompts were required for all three actors, and scenes often came across in a very stilted fashion as a result. This created a somewhat bizarre atmosphere within the BT, as the audience seemed to be willing the actors on with every line and there was an odd sense of camaraderie through the room as they took a very short on-stage break and then continued the play with fewer issues. With any luck, these teething problems will be rapidly resolved, and the remaining performances will be unaffected, because when the actors really got going they were generally very good. The juxtaposition of Melanie Brooklyn’s anxious Sarah with Imogen Edwards-Lawrence’s lively and multifaceted Sophie was particularly sparky. It was refreshing to see a non-male-led cast, and hopefully as the run continues their confidence will improve, given that these are clearly talented actors who could be truly excellent with a little more time to learn all their lines.

For a play set exclusively in a teenage bedroom, lighting and set were necessarily very basic, but within the confines of the Burton Taylor this proved more of an asset to the production than anything else. The simple combination of pale white light and a bed/table set-up allowed the small audience to really focus on the words being said; at times, I even thought that Like A Virgin might work better – or at least equally well – as a radio play, given that the words and well-written natural dialogue were the star of the show.