Tuesday 7th October 2025
Blog Page 756

Students protest ‘transphobic’ women’s group

6

A large protest in support of transgender rights was held outside the Radcliffe Camera on Wednesday evening, in response to the ‘TERF’ group Women’s Place holding a talk in Oxford.

The 120-person group gathered at 6pm to display signs and hold speeches from activists criticising Women’s Place for depicting trans people as “monsters”, outing them, and fostering hate speech.

Protesters condemned Women’s Place through the evening as TERFs (Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists) as opposed to inter-sectional and inclusive campaigners for equal rights.

Ribbons, in the colours of the transgender pride flag, were tied to the railings of the Rad Cam to “honour” trans people who have “experienced violence from TERFs and thousands who have committed suicide or experienced transmisogyny and transphobia”.

The Oxford SU’s LGBTQ+ campaign and the university LGBTQ+ society issued a statement on Tuesday evening condemning the meeting.

The join statement described Women’s Place as “one of several groups dedicated to challenging trans people’s existing rights in the UK” and claimed they have “profil[ed] trans women as male sexual predators and vilif[ied] trans activists as violent oppressors of free speech”.

A statement released by Women’s Place on Wednesday says this statement “defames” Woman’s Place and its members and “contains many inaccuracies”.

The talk held by Women’s Place concerned proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), which would include allowing trans people to self-identify their gender and align their legal sex with their gender identity on documentation.

Under the current law, trans people must receive a formal diagnosis of gender dysphoria – the state of identifying with a gender other than the one assigned at birth, which requires lengthy assessments by medical doctors and psychologists. Additionally, they must have lived in their “acquired gender” for two years.

Trans people argue that the GRA needs to be reformed, as the current lengthy process means that trans people can’t determine their own personal identity.

Women’s Place was founded in 2017 to discuss the impact of changes to the Gender Recognition act and for “women’s voices to be heard”.

They campaign for “women’s only spaces to be upheld” and express fear that “the provision of single sex services, such as those provided by rape crisis centres” could be affected by changes to legislation.

The organisation’s statement on Wednesday denounced efforts by Oxford students to “shut down” their meeting, and called on politicians to “protect free speech”.

The statement also denied claims that Women’s Place was a transphobic organisation.

“Trans people are welcome at all [our] meetings, and [Women’s Place UK] have already had two trans speakers on the platform who share the concerns.”

One of the organisers of the protest, Jack Doyle, told Cherwell: “There are fears from trans exclusive feminists that men would be coming into women’s spaces. However, there is no evidence to suggest that that would happen.”

Doyle said that “[the Women’s Place talk] is not a free and open discussion by any means. The venue has been kept secret, and no trans people were invited to speak on the panel.”

Characterising the opinions of those who were to speak as “hate speech”, Doyle went on to say, “I don’t think it would be productive to engage with those people, so instead we are having a visible demonstration where people can see us and hopefully disagree” with Women’s Place.

A member of the trans community who spoke at the protest, Clara Barker, was invited to attend the talk but told the crowd that they didn’t think it was an equal or fair panel. They felt that the event would have negative impacts on their physical and mental health, as well as fearing possible altercations.

Nicola Williams, who represented the “Fair Play for Women” group and was one of the panellists at the Women’s Place talk, told Cherwell that she would be talking about laws and how that “at the moment trans rights and women’s rights are balanced”.

Williams said that “it is fine to have trans women in women’s spaces in many occasions” but that “sometimes when sex matters, such as in a women’s refuge, it is important to have a distinction”.

She stressed that “it is just a debate to talk about the law so people know what is happening and get some feedback”.

Regarding the lack of Trans people on the panel Williams told Cherwell: “it is difficult as there aren’t that many trans people who would want to speak.”

Williams mentioned that it was a “shame” that Barker declined an invitation to attend.

She said they “would be very welcome to come.”

Christine, a trans woman attending the event who did not provide her surname, told Cherwell that she thought the Women’s Place campaign was “very positive” as “women do have genuine concerns and they are not being heard by the political elite”.

She described the phrase ‘TERF’ as a slur, saying that she feared that “there are many more women who fear to speak up” and that she wanted dialogue and debate so that an understanding could be reached.

“I am not saying that there isn’t transphobia on this side of the argument. I think at times there is but I don’t think that fundamentally women are motivated by transphobia.”

Hannah Clark, another protestor, told Cherwell that the proposed changes to the GRA were “seemingly progressive” but that she was concerned about the way that service providers could interpret the law, claiming that “women’s spaces, women’s refuges, women’s hospital wards” could be impacted negatively.

Clark is a representative of the ‘Man Friday’ campaign which encourages women to self-identify as men every Friday to protest possible changes to the Gender Recognition Act. When questioned about the protesters’ accusations of transphobia she said that she thought this was “incredibly lazy” and that the event was an “inclusive place”.

Clark told Cherwell: “We are not saying that trans people don’t exist or trans people shouldn’t exist, we are saying if you are going to change the law you need to insure that everyone’s voices are heard…there is not a hierarchy of rights.”

One of the few men attending, who did not wish to be identified, told Cherwell: “Postmodernism has gone a bit crazy, and we are losing definitions.”

“We need to restore balance to our culture and say that a woman is actually a woman, a man cannot become a woman.”

After finishing their protest at the Rad Cam the group of activists marched to the Women’s Place meeting. Members of the group described themselves as an autonomous students who came together from both Oxford and Brookes Universities.

They received endorsement from Oxford’s racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ equality campaigns. Members included trangendered people, a women’s representative from the National Union of Students, and LGBTQ+ community members and allies.

Oxford could face ‘sanctions’ over access inequality, says Education Committee

0

The chair of the UK’s House of Commons Education Committee has claimed that elite universities will face sanctions if they fail to address their “social justice problem”.

Speaking at a University Alliance event on degree apprenticeships, Robert Halfon MP said that he wanted to see “elite universities properly being held to account for the numbers of disadvantaged students they admit”.

The Education Committee confirmed to Cherwell that the new Office for Students would consider sanctions.

The body’s chief executive, Nicola Dandridge MP, said in Parliament last month: “There is a whole range of sanctions that can be applied, from encouragement, engagement, and discussion to fines and more interventionist approaches at the other end.

“In the past, the Director of Fair Access could refuse to sign off a plan, in which case the higher fee could not be charged – that was the nuclear option, if you like.

“That was actually quite difficult, because it did not allow for a nuanced range of responses. We have many more tools available to us, which will allow for a more nuanced and therefore more effective engagement with universities.”

Halfon, the Conservative MP for Harlow, warned of a ‘two-tier’ system within UK universities.

“I would like to see the elite universities properly being held to account for the numbers of disadvantaged students they admit – and the support they receive whilst studying.

“Perhaps we should regard universities as elite only if they are providing a real ladder of opportunity to the disadvantaged. Maybe universities should only be seen as ‘the best’ when they lead their students to well-paid job destinations and reduce Britain’s skills deficit.

“The new Office for Students must lead in this. There must be sanctions from the new regulator for those universities who are failing in this regard.”

In March, the Higher Education Standards Agency (Hesa) revealed that Oxford accepted fewer applications from poor neighbourhoods in the 2017-18 academic year than any other mainstream institution.

Just 2.8% of the University’s intake were from students who live in areas classified as the most difficult to engage in higher education.

Following the report’s publication, Labour MP David Lammy – who accused Oxford and Cambridge of “social apartheid” in October – tweeted: “Shame on them. Oxbridge take £700m a year in taxpayers’ money yet are not tackling entrenched privilege.”

Earlier this month, Oxford was ranked as the fourth-most unequal university in Britain in a report by the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi).

The results came from calculating the ‘Gini coefficient’ for UK universities based on their share of student entrants that came from the five different Participation of Local Areas (Polar) quintiles in 2016.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Oxford…is committed to further diversifying its undergraduate intake, and to being honest and transparent about our record on access. We have agreed targets with [the Office for Students] and against these we are showing strong performance – particularly in relation to our recruitment of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged post-codes, as well as schools and colleges with limited progression to Oxford.”

Wadham trials new ‘paternalistic’ smoking restriction

2

Wadham will trial a new smoking policy for Trinity Term that limits the act to areas “immediately” around eight smoking bins. The college informed students of the new policy via an email on Tuesday.

According to the email, Wadham “conducted a consultation last term on its smoking policy.”

“As a result, Governing Body has decided that for a trial period lasting for all of Trinity Term, smoking on the main College site will be restricted to the immediate vicinity of the existing smoking bins.”

A map attached to the email marks the locations of the smoking bins, most of which are on the edge of campus. The email continues: “The College will be closely monitoring adherence to the new guidelines, and will review the smoking policy at the end of the term.

“It is essential that these new guidelines are fully respected. If they are not, the College will consider moving to a total smoking ban.”

The email also warned students that there is no smoking bin outside the MCR, “where many smokers currently choose to congregate.”

Wadham joins St Hugh’s college in trialling a smoking ban in Trinity, while seven colleges including St Edmund Hall and Mansfield have blanket bans on smoking.

St Hugh’s decision to trial a ban was criticised by some students as “ridiculous” and “parental.”

When Exeter announced plans for a ban that were later withdrawn, Exeter JCR Disabilities Rep Grace Tully told Cherwell: “Habitual smokers are aware of the drawbacks and danger of the habit, but our community gains nothing from physically and socially ostracizing those of us who do still smoke.”

A Wadham second year told Cherwell: “I’m annoyed at college for further attacking the rights of smokers. I do feel this is just the first step to an outright ban. Such paternalism really isn’t in the spirit of Wadham, in my opinion.”

Wadham SU declined to comment.

College JCRs back all-female festival

1

Somerville and Wadham JCRs have each supported £250 worth of funding for The Sisterhood Festival, a charity music event organised exclusively by and for those whose
identify as women. Mansfield’s JCR has pledged £200 towards the event.

The festival will be taking place on Wednesday 13th June at the Varsity Club and aims to “celebrate the achievements of women in a music scene that is often dominated by men, and creating a safe, empowering and inspiring space for them”. Several more requests for funding are due to be proposed to other JCRs in the upcoming days.

Event co-ordinator, Jess Bollands, a third-year Somerville English student and front-woman
of female funk band Sisters of Funk, was inspired to create the event after hearing about a venue of the same name which was introduced at Glastonbury Festival in 2016.

The venue aimed to create a safe and inclusive space for its “female festival-goers” which Bollands and the rest of the Oxford’s Sisterhood hope to replicate.

She told Cherwell: “I set up the all-women funk band, Sisters of Funk, back in Michaelmas and have been blown away by the reception that we’ve received.

“Having seen first-hand how empowering and inspiring it is to give female performers a platform, I thought it would be incredible to put on an event that could showcase the many talented female and non binary musicians, performers and DJs that Oxford has to offer.”

The festival will also be raising money and awareness for three charities based in Oxford: The Oxfordshire Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Centre, Syrian Sisters, and The Porch.
The event organisers plan to use the Varsity Club’s multiple floors to showcase different genres of music. Attendants of the event can expect an acoustic stage showcasing female singer songwriters and a cappella groups, such as the Oxford Belles, a main stage featuring funk and soul performers and a drag king, in addition to a rooftop DJ performing
throughout the evening.

The rooftop will also have arts and crafts stalls, as well as drop off stations for students to donate sanitary products and toiletries to Shoebox Oxford, an organisation that packages and sends these items to vulnerable women across Oxfordshire.

Along with support from JCRs, Sisterhood are teaming up withfeminist zine, Cuntry Living, to hold a club night at cellar on the 9th of May in order to promote the night and raise funds. As with the festival, the night has an exclusively female setlist. A committee member responsible for the organisation of the night, Maya Tysoe, said it will be a “fun
filled night of funk and soul at Oxford’s grooviest club, Cellar, to promote its first ever all female festival.”

She said that the night is most importantly a celebration of “all things female” and called it “a groundbreaking collaboration to celebrate the achievements of female artists and musicians and to create a platform to inspire and empower all those who identify as
women.”

Oxford professor banned from driving after hitting child

0

A 97-year-old Oxford professor and war veteran who hit a nine-year-old child after running a red light on Botley Road has been let off with a fine.

Tony Honoré, a law professor and honorary fellow at All-Souls College, denied charges of dangerous driving but was found guilty in his absence at the Oxford Magistrate’s Court on Friday.

Honoré was charged with a £750 fine and a twelve month ban from driving for the offence. The court heard that the nine-year-old, Ragnar Cadogan, did not sustain serious injuries from February’s accident and has since made a full recovery.

Honoré failed a roadside eyesight test after officers arrived on the scene.

Finding him guilty of dangerous driving, District Judge Malcolm Dodds said: “There is no dispute that a red light was clearly displayed and there is no dispute that there are pedestrians crossing on a red light.

“The accident speaks for itself. That is powerful evidence of dangerous driving because how on earth could a reasonable, competent and careful driver travelling down Botley Road not be really obviously aware of a pedestrian crossing, pedestrians on the crossing and the red light?

“This isn’t a case of ‘oops, oh dear’, using the brakes and coming to a stop: he carries on for quite a period of time and what appears to be a state of oblivion as to what is going on.

“That is incredibly powerful evidence to a driver falling well below the standard of what is expected of a careful and competent driver.”

In mitigation, Honoré’s defense counsel said that the accident had taken a heavy toll on the professor, who said it was “the worst thing that happened to him in his life.”

Dodds added: “He said this was worse than the injury he suffered in the war [during the Battle of El Alamein, 1942].

“There aren’t many people left who fought in the Second World War and I suspect he is one of the very few survivors of that battle.

“The accident was terribly traumatic for [Ragnar’s mother] and the only good thing is that Ragnar suffered miraculously few injuries.”

Cherwell has contacted Tony Honoré for comment.

Living wage ‘Norrington Table’ launched

0

The Oxford University Living Wage Campaign has launched a ‘Living Wage Norrington Table’, to highlight the “underpaid workers whose labour our university lives rely on”.

The table ranks each college and Permanent Private Hall (PPH) by a range of factors, including base pay rate, job security, and bonuses.

It reveals that six colleges are known to not be paying the Living Wage at the time data was received. Meanwhile, as Cherwell confirmed last term, no colleges pay the Oxford Living Wage, which accounts for the higher living costs in the city and is used by Oxford City Council.

In establishing a ranking of colleges, the campaign first used the set of data was the lowest hourly wage paid to college staff in the previous financial year, and the number of staff paid below the current Living Wage as calculated by the Living Wage Foundation in November each year.

They then factored in the payment of bonuses and the use of perks or incentives. These can help alleviate some of the problems with low pay, with bonuses often being paid at periods in the year associated with high cost pressures such as Christmas and the summer period.

Keble is the highest ranked college, finishing third-placed overall behind PPHs Campion Hall and Blackfriar’s. Surprisingly, however, they are not one of the thirteen colleges accredited to the Living Wage foundation as National Living Wage employers.

A Keble spokesperson told Cherwell: “We intend to pay at least the Living Wage but we do not think that, as Trustees of a Charity, we should be devolving any responsibility to pay and benefits to a third party.”

According to the table, six colleges are not paying the national Living Wage at the time data was received.Two colleges – Harris Manchester and St John’s – intend to implement the wage in May and August respectively.

Meanwhile, Wycliffe Hall and Wolfson have registered non-payment of the National Living Wage but did not reveal current wage rates.

Finally, Magdalen and St Catherine’s did not submit sufficient data, with the campaign using figures from previous years to provide estimates of current base rates.

Outgoing chair of the campaign, Jacob Armstrong, told Cherwell: “The Norrington Table reflects the hard work of students and teaching staff across the university, but often we forget the underpaid workers whose labour our university lives rely on.

“The Living Wage Campaign wants to change that. We have collected data on wages and conditions across colleges and private halls in the university since our inception, and decided to undertake the ambitious task of producing a comparable table based upon base wage rates across our constituent colleges and halls as they stand in 2018.

“A new conversation is desperately needed to address the lack of fair and proportionate wages for non-academic staff, particularly after the City Council has shown such leadership in its recent consultation on the Oxford Living Wage for its employees.”

The Oxford University Living Wage Campaign was founded in 2013 by Oxford students to campaign for a Living Wage for all staff within the university and its constituent colleges.

In 2015, the campaign was successful in lobbying the university to pursue accreditation to the National Living Wage as set by the Living Wage Foundation, currently set at £8.75/hr.

Travesties Preview – ‘I have never felt so threatened by a teacup’

0

Seeking a way to explain Dada, Henry Carr (Lee Simmonds) sways from side to side, leading with a shaking, pointed finger, somehow so uncertain and yet so smooth. Behind him, an enigmatic ensemble cast sharply punctuate his every word: his every thought of the past is given physical form. In a sense, the whole play is only the physical form of Henry Carr’s vague inklings, but this decision to use the ensemble to place every thought under a microscopic lens makes the impossible density of Stoppard’s witty script a little less impossible to comprehend.

Talking to director Bea Udale-Smith after the preview, she told us that this production of Travesties would be a walk away from the often middle-aged, middle-class demographic of Stoppard through the use of a more visual style. I agreed when she said that productions of Stoppard often rely on the wit of the writing, and play up the characters’ intellect to the point where references are often lost. I’ve studied Stoppard for my degree, but I feel seeing this production of Travesties directed with this unique attitude could help me more in solidifying my understanding of the play than heaps of literary criticism might.

I was moved when Bea explained her interpretation of the concept of probability in Stoppard. The play emphasises the vast coincidence that Lenin, Joyce and Tristan Tzara were all in Zurich, using the same library, for a small period of time in 1917, and whenever Carr is asked why he doesn’t worry about Lenin’s revolution, the response is ‘a million to one’ that he will succeed. Similarly, Carr criticises Tzara and Joyce with my favourite line in the play: “For every thousand people, there are nine hundred doing work, ninety doing well, nine doing good, and one lucky bastard who’s the artist.”

Carr presents these characters as individuals who have fallen through the cosmic gaps – they’ve no right to have become so famous in the first place, let alone all be together. Bea said that this was part of Carr’s great tragedy – he watched not only one but three people whom he hated become the fathers of the modern age, while he was never remembered (before I read the play, as you probably do now, I had no idea who Henry Carr was). I could see this deep regret in Lee Simmonds’ performance – as Henry Carr makes up unreliable tableaus before the audience of what his youth was like, making up a new personality and attitude for himself every time, there is a melancholy behind it all. A grim smile here, a slight hesitation, the sense that at any moment Carr’s old-age depression could break through the facade of his young life.

Bea also showed us a scene from one of the sections of the play modelled after The Importance of Being Earnest. I have never felt so threatened by a teacup as when watching Gwendolen (Olivia White) aggressively drive Cecily (Emma Howlett) through an afternoon tea told entirely in rhyme. The rhyme of the scene, combined with the elements taken from the playground of Wilde’s absurd, epigrammatic parallel world really gave the impression that the artificiality of the play (and thus Carr’s imagination) reached an exponential crescendo towards the end. When Bea said that she only directed one scene as entirely real, entirely genuine, it made me excited to see what she interprets as the one truth of Travesties. Stoppard has said in interviews about Travesties that “I do not think it tells the truth,” and as a play full of lies and fictions, that one truthful scene will mean the world.

Tristan Tzara is possibly my favourite character in any Stoppard play, and though I didn’t get the chance to see Julia Pilkington playing him, I look forward to see what a production with such emphasis on choreography could do with him. Tzara is flamboyant, destructive, and misanthropic – if Lee Simmonds could cause carnage on the stage with nothing but a cheese sandwich, I can’t wait to see what a wild nihilist with a death wish for all art can do.

As with most Stoppard plays, Travesties is a literature or history nerd’s dream play, but I think that the absurdist comedy that clashes with its haunting melancholy makes it a play that anyone could enjoy, so I encourage everyone to go and see it in second week!

Resignation forces Union reshuffle

0

The elected secretary of the Oxford Union has resigned from his position, prompting a series of changes in the society’s hierarchy.

Shanuk Mediwaka resigned from the role on Sunday with immediate effect for personal reasons.

Brendan McGrath, who was elected as a candidate for Standing Committee, will replace Shanuk as secretary, as per rule 38.

It is understood Cecilia Zhao, as the Standing Committee candidate to win the most votes, was given first refusal for the promotion, but chose to waive the offer allowing second-placed McGrath to step in. Zhao has been contacted for comment.

Meanwhile, Maxim Parr-Reid – who narrowly missed out on a place in Standing Committee in last term’s elections – will fill the vacated slot of McGrath.

The Union declined to comment.

Oxfess and Oxlove admins take pages offline after abuse

1

The admins of Facebook pages Oxfess and Oxlove have taken the pages down after targeted anonymous submissions about them.

The pages – who are administered by the same team – had grown hugely in popularity since their inception last year. The Oxlove page had over 9,000 likes on Facebook, with Oxfess having around 10,500.

However, they were both taken down from Facebook on Tuesday afternoon following a set of abusive submissions.

One of the admins told Cherwell: “I’m not sure if Oxlove and Oxfess are returning – there were submissions targeting me and the other admin about our roles on the page in a particularly nasty way.

“We run Oxlove and Oxfess in a way that we think improves the Oxford community as a place to spread the love and discuss problems with the institutions anonymously, taking up quite a lot of time.

“We are much less willing to that if we get lots of anonymous attacks on our positions as admins.”

Oxlove, which was created last year following the success of Cambridge-based page Crushbridge, allowed students to anonymously submit posts declaring their love for other students.

A few weeks after Oxlove’s inception, the admins created Oxfess, which received widespread attention and praise after lifting the lid on student mental health in an unexpected way.

Both pages received between 150 and 200 submissions a day, and had a post reach of between 100,000 and 200,000 views per week.

In a June 2017 interview with Cherwell, one of the pages’ admins said: “I realised there would be some mental health stuff [on Oxfess], but I didn’t realise the extent to which it would be the case.

“It’s nice that people feel that there’s a place to talk about these things.”

Oxford’s third major anonymous submissions page, Oxfeud, has been inactive since January, after receiving constant criticism for allegedly providing a platform for hate speech.

Oxford beaten in uni ranking by Cambridge for eighth year running

0

Oxford was beaten by Cambridge for the eighth year in a row in the Complete University Guide 2019.

Cambridge topped the rankings with Loughborough, UCL, Warwick, and Durham also appearing in the top ten.

The guide ranks universities by their entry standards, student satisfaction, research quality, and graduate prospects.

Chairman of The Complete University Guide, Dr Bernard Kingston, told Metro: “It is a fact that Cambridge and Oxford have usually topped the table.

“But some 20 British universities could be regarded as top world-class institutions – some ancient like Cambridge and Oxford, and some modern like Warwick and Lancaster. All are able to attract faculty and research funding globally.

“This clearly influences the quality of their undergraduate teaching and enables them to recruit high-quality students.

https://www.datawrapper.de/_/Ng2z5/

“All universities strive for continual improvement, and it is conceivable that in the future others may pose a challenge to Cambridge and Oxford.”

Cambridge have topped the table for eight years in a row

The list ranks 131 universities and is updated annually but Cambridge and Oxford have occupied the two top spaces since 2014. The last time Oxford topped the table was in 2011.

LSE, Imperial, and St Andrews took the rest of the places in the top five.

Neither Oxford or Cambridge had a score for Student satisfaction after boycotts rendered the results of the National Student Survey (NSS) unusable.

Staffordshire university climbed the most places since last year’s Guide, rising by 32 places to 72nd.