Sunday 3rd May 2026
Blog Page 779

Shaking up an “Office”

Walls, desks, computer screens, a coffee machine, and a meeting room. The office we interned at has all of these, like most offices. But it seeks to be different and to make work enjoyable. The lifestyle brand is all about its great buzzy community, from its employees, to its collaborators, clients and fans. Kim and Kanye are always watching from the centre of the room – sadly not the real deal, but they’re the office goldfish, so almost as good. They became part of the company when the office’s small meeting room reminded the team of a fishbowl. Behind them is their wall of products which started the brand. Next to that, a wall of fame, with articles about Victoria Beckham’s specially-designed notebook, featuring the faces of all the Beckham family, being covered by the Evening Standard, Hello Magazine, and the Daily Mail, among others. What else? A Wall of Shame, a Wall of Office Ideas (like making a dress for Henry Hoover), a chalk-board of witticisms, and a meme board. You name the type of board, it’s there. On most days, the meme board or chalk-board gained new things. Everyone is involved in ongoing trends and news, and the boards allow members of the team to share comments and opinions or just laugh at new features on the boards. It breaks up the day a bit more and keeps the company seeking out entertaining images.

So, with the mental image of this “office” space, and the aural image of ongoing music chosen and changed at any time by any member of the team (we had Beach Boys, Ed Sheeran and Rihanna, but also a variety of National Anthems …), what’s the effect? Well, it makes the space seem more of a background to ideas and more welcoming of innovative thinking – and of laughter – than other work spaces. Two other great ways the office is made into a lively space are, firstly, that all of the team (it’s a small but growing one), are facing one another on the same table. It makes conversations and idea-throwing much easier, and encompasses multiple people in any entertaining conversation. Secondly, the bell and tambourine, which is welcome to anyone to mark any announcements, group-queries, or achievements with noise. They help make announcements lively and they’re a great mark of celebrating the brand’s achievements and growth.

All of these office-features can be easily taken into any space, which is good because the company is growing quickly.  But it’ll still be the fun brand that holds its values and its non-traditional office-life quirks regardless of size. There’s a common misconception that after graduating everyone ‘sells their soul’ to become a small cog in some giant corporate machine, but places like this prove that that is by no means the case. Sure, you get the busy London Tube in the morning with everyone else, but that’s where the similarities stop. The intimate and openly fun atmosphere at the office means that not only does being at work never feel like a drag, but you really feel like you are a part of the business as a whole. Every aspect of the business is worked on around the same group of tables – some people are working on product sourcing, some on design, others on celebrity gifting, and others on sales to companies such as ASOS and Urban Outfitters – and this means that whatever your individual role you quickly get a feel for all the functions of the business, and can see first-hand how your contribution develops within the process.

An office like this shows how fun can thrive alongside cohesion and efficiency, and is a really rewarding environment in which to work. The office mood board, music, and shared desk-space details help shape everyone’s work life into a cool, slightly unusual shape – an irregular polygon of the working world. The encouraged laughter and Love Island gossiping (they sell a Do-Bits-Society mug!) make this workspace a space of amusement, too. Plus #throwbackthursday is given the best type of reality, as a post-work office drinking sesh.  Working didn’t seem much like work when we were part of a community enjoying themselves, creating products for others to enjoy. With their stationery being made in the UK, the happy vibe of the products can be traced from when they’re designed to when they’re delivered and received!

 

‘I have only ever tried to show you beauty’: Florence Welch’s ‘Useless Magic’

0

Loyal followers of Florence Welch have long been aware of her creative ability extending beyond song writing. The ethereal Alice-rebels-in-wonderland visuals created for ‘Rabbit Heart’ (2009) and the chaptered ‘Odyssey’ which tells individual songs including ‘Delilah’ and ‘What Kind of Man’ (2015) have long evidenced her outstanding abilities as not only a singer, but as an artist. When ‘Useless Magic’ was announced, we were told to expect an assemblage of her lyrics and poetry. Through the addition of visual elements, the anthology encapsulates both her well-known lyrics and private scribblings, allowing an illumination into the mind behind ‘Lungs’, ‘Ceremonials’, ‘How Big, How Blue, How Beautiful’ and her newly-released poetry.

The preface immediately binds together Welch’s handwritten admissions and her printed words, a relationship which continues throughout the collection. The scanned page upon opening reads “I make songs to tie people to me” – we are immediately aware that, for Welch, writing is a call for others to remain. Telling us that songs speak to her, arise only through her as medium, she says “I am a conduit but totally oblivious to its wisdom”. Her lyrics and poetry, which she believes are no longer separated but have “started to bleed into each other”, flow through her voice and pen.

Separated into chapters according to album, the collection spans the progression of Welch’s song writing. Throughout ‘Lungs’, a breath of wind passes through pages resembling trees, lyrics tell of dreaming and beating bird wings, intertwined with William Morris prints torn away to reveal her handwriting. Flowers establish dominion, the chapter being filled with their different forms, notably an illustration by Welch of sharp-edged flowers with jagged leaves and the words “I don’t want anything now or ever again”, presented next to the lyrics for ‘My Boy Builds Coffins’, a song expressing the beauty and unique form each individual’s death will take. Beginning in this chapter, and continuing throughout, are individual entries by Welch expressing feelings, fears, conversations with an unknown auditor. One entry, “‘I love you’, she said/ he replied ‘that’s a shame’” seems to encapsulate a feeling of haunting unrequitedness, surrounded by sprawling biro lilies and twice drawn circles. ‘Lungs’ becomes frequented by John William Waterhouse, including his ‘Lady of Shallot’ and ‘Ophelia’. Depicting flame-haired women surrounded by branches above a body of water, they reflect both the muse-like stature of Florence herself and her preoccupation with water imagery which prevails throughout every album.

Visuals take on their own role in expressing the meaning of the collection. Paintings by various artists shed light on meaning of individual songs – featured artists in ‘Ceremonials’ include Gustav Klimt, Tamara De Lempika and Botticelli. Klimt’s Water Serpents I falls next to the final page of ‘Heartlines’ wherein an image of two golden heads, held together in an ecstasy of falling vines and pale closed eyelids, seem to reflect Welch’s adjoining lyric “But know, in some way, I’m there with you”. A continuous thread, both in ‘Ceremonials’ and the rest of the collection, is the presence of religious, particularly Catholic, iconography. ‘The Virgin Adoring the Sleeping Christ Child’ by Botticelli and Delacroix’s ‘The Virgin of the Sacred Heart’ allow a tone of divinity to reign ever-present, fitting for an album and a woman constantly wrestling with such themes as violence, love and death. For Welch, Catholic symbolism hurtles into 21st century concerns of missed phone calls and lies told by Hollywood.

Through the addition of her own sketches and notes, the collection begins to transition so softly into her own poetry that the final section is a natural progression. Welch’s poetry was first released in Chapters 5 and 6 of ‘The Odyssey’ as an auditory transition between two songs. Included in the original form – handwritten on Chateau Marmont stationary – we are reminded that Florence’s poetry is her own, personal and confessional and full of desire for the transcendental. One poem murmurs of a desired metamorphosis into another body, to be “out of your own and consumed by another”. Each line falls like a passage of water, slipping like channels which echo of salt and thirst and loss to sea.

Her poetry is ceremonious in its simplicity. ‘I Cannot Write About This’ exorcises a “wordless thing” which is “altogether/ Too Grown Up/ Too Sad/ Too ‘the best for us both’/ To put into poetry”. She expresses an almost child-like fear of something too far grown, too steeped in reality to cope with. There is a recurring presence of the spectral, and a recognition that we are susceptible to becoming so, with ‘I Guess I Won’t Write Poetry’ describing how “Being ‘Famous’/ Is like being an anxious ghost”, for “You are an apparition/ A figment of your own imagination”. Welch takes the boundary of the real and ethereal, the human and preternatural and plays it like a harp string. This boundary oscillates in the reality of the city in ‘Wedding’, opening through the stanza “London is a graveyard of ex-boyfriends/ family trauma/ and scenes that smashed themselves to pieces”. There is an almost Eliot-like perception of London; it becomes a hell-scape, a city of daylight ghosts and fallen ruins of memory. The collection is a beautiful, more-than-human hybrid of private musings and universal experiences. What emerges is a beautiful, multi-media tapestry of the mind behind one of music’s most unique voices.

Box sets to watch over the summer

0

Summer is the perfect chance to watch the box sets that you had to set aside amidst the increasing deadlines and impending sense of doom as exam season approached.

The Walking Dead

Sheriff’s deputy Rick Grimes wakes from a coma to find the world a very different place, with a virus capable of turning people into flesh eating ‘walkers’ having taken over the US. The Walking Dead is primarily a show about survival and how Rick and his group deal with the harrowing situation that they have found themselves in.

As the stakes are always so high, the show keeps you rooted to the screen as the often heartbreaking events unfold. The body count is as high as Game of Thrones and you learn to expect the unexpected.

The make-up on the walkers is very impressive as they look satisfyingly gruesome, but people turn out to be as great of a threat, if not more so, than the roaming zombies, as groups of survivors that Rick and co come into contact with provides a commentary on the inability of people to work together even in desperate situations.

With no end to the show in sight, The Walking Dead is a great series to get yourself invested in.

Gilmore Girls

With 157 episodes over seven seasons and a four-episode revival in 2016, you’ll need to set aside a good chunk of your summer to get through this classic. But when a series is packed with a well-crafted sense of humour, interesting plot lines and a delightful mother/daughter relationship, that’s unquestionably time well spent. A running theme throughout Gilmore Girls is the many problems that intense family dynamics can cause, as the relationship between Lorelai and her mother Emily highlights. For students at Oxford it is easy to identify with the pressures Rory faces as she sets her sights on achieving admission into a top American university.

Even though the cast are all excellent throughout the show, the revival left me slightly disappointed compared to the main series, but I would still recommend watching it to see how the characters fare after ten years. Sean Gunn provides a particularly stand out performance as Kirk Gleason, whose character never fails to delight when he turns up in an episode attempting a new business venture.

Downton Abbey

Downton Abbey is a much-loved historical drama set in the early 20th century splendour of Highclere castle, dramatising the lives of the aristocratic Crawley family and their servants. Head Writer Julian Fellowes expertly weaves real world events into the troubles of Downton’s inhabitants including the sinking of the Titanic and the First World War, as well as important themes like the difficulties of being gay at that time and the erosion of the aristocratic way of life. A strength of the show is that it deals with life for both the upper class and ‘downstairs’ as we are offered a scintillating insight into the life of a servant on one of England’s vast country estates.

Even forgetting the fantastic sets and lavish costumes, Downton Abbey is one of those shows where it’s very difficult to criticise the acting as the show is filled with some of Britain’s greatest actors, including Maggie Smith who delights as the Dowager Countess with her wry sense of humour and sassy one liners. My favourite performance though is given by Rob-James Collier as Thomas Barrow who begins life at Downton as a footman and has a satisfying character arc over the course of the six seasons.

This is simply one of those British historical dramas that you can’t miss; even if you’ve watched the series before it’s well worth a re-watch as it’s been announced that the long-awaited film will begin shooting this summer!

Merlin

Merlin is one of my childhood favourites and a series that you can go back to again and again. Loosely based on the Arthurian legends, Merlin features the adventures of a young Arthur and Merlin who work to save Camelot from its many enemies. The chief source of tension lies in the fact that Merlin is forced to hide his magical abilities from Arthur, saving him time and again without being able to take any of the credit.

Despite their position as master and servant, the rapport between Arthur and Merlin is one of the most delightful tenets of the show. Bradley James and Colin Morgan are great as Arthur and Merlin respectively, and being the dominant focus of the action, their performances largely carry the show.

The show is poorly served by a rushed finale due to its premature cancellation, squeezing conclusions to important storylines into a two-part finale, which left many viewers at the time a little disappointed. Despite the rushed ending, Merlin is a brilliant watch, especially if you’re a fan of Harry Potter.

 

Review: Voids by Martyn

0

Favourite Tracks: Manchester, Mind Rain, Voids Two

Rating: 8/10

 

Last year, the Dutch-born Martyn unfortunately suffered from a near-fatal heart attack. The first thing he listened to after leaving hospital was M’Boom, a jazz percussion album released by the drummer Max Roach in 1979. This experience served as a catalyst for Deijkers’ return to the studio after his recovery. Speaking about Roach’s project, Deijkers said, “I could hear so much space in the music, something I had never noticed before; almost like a 3D experience, with the most striking aspect being the emptiness between the players.”

It is easy to see why M’Boom was so resonant with Deijkers – the percussive elements of his production have consistently been the defining elements of his style. With Voids, Deijkers’ fourth album, and his first for exclusive Berlin club Berghain’s in-house record label Ostgut Ton, Deijkers continues his exploration of the dynamic space created by the merging of techno and UK bass. His signature reverbed, hollowed rhythms take on a new meaning in the context of the bold, Berghain-shaped sound that he incorporates. For instance, ‘World Gate’ has all the hall-marks of a classic Martyn track – echoing rave stabs and hypnotic vocals sit above a low-slung UK funky beat – yet, the percussion sounds more intricate and polished than any of Deijkers’ previous work. It is as if Martyn has been able to utilise the “emptiness between the players” more effectively, giving resonance to the spaces in the music – giving significance to the voids.

In a recent interview with Sven Von Thülen, Deijkers spoke of getting into dance music as drum and bass producers started to gravitate towards techno in the late 90s, and felt most connected to pioneers of the ‘techstep’ sub-genre that was emerging at that time, with artists like Ed Rush and Doc Scott on the frontline. Deijkers’ percussion can perhaps be seen as an attempt to bridge this space between bass-driven, 160bpm+ music, and more brooding, four-to-the-floor dance music. His distinctive, hardcore-inspired techno sound fills the void between these two poles.

This affiliation with drum and bass music manifests itself most powerfully on ‘Mind Rain’, which offers the most dynamic showcasing of Deijkers’ artistic prowess. It opens with a low-pitched, pulsing note that portends something ominous – the calm before the storm. Propulsive polyrhythms then follow, like a torrent of rain frenetically plummeting to the ground, while the growling sub that emerges adds even more ferocity to the track.

A sense of anxiety and paranoia pervades several of the tracks on Voids. ‘Cutting Tone’ features a dread-laden, high-pitched drone and a body-popping, distorted garage beat, as if a crowd of hysteric dancers are convulsing to a manic groove. On ‘Voids Two’, a woman’s monotone voice repeats the words ‘explosive decompression’ while a siren beeps, like some impending disaster is approaching. Again, however, it is the dexterity of Deijkers’ percussion that steals the show – one snare hit sounds almost like someone gasping for air, or the panicked breath of someone who knows their time is running out.

Despite the frenzy and urgency of several parts of the album, Deijkers leaves room for a more thoughtful cut on ‘Manchester’. Its shuffling 2-step rhythm sounds hollower and more restrained than any of the other tracks on Voids, as a voice laments, ‘deep deep talent’ and ‘we’ve lost a big one’. As well as being an ode to the city of Manchester and its music scene, the track is dedicated to Marcus ‘Intalex’ Kaye, a drum and bass prime-mover, who was up-and-coming in the 90s, and who sadly passed away last year. Kaye was a close friend of Deijkers, who wrote on Instagram, “I met Marcus sometime around 1998 and our musical lives have been intertwined ever since. After his passing, I once again realized the importance of putting more effort into friendships and not let the people you love turn into Facebook contacts”. In paying tribute to such a key figure in the development of drum and bass, Deijkers immortalises Kaye’s influence, his memory living on in the voids between the music.

 

Oxford First-Generation students launch Alumni Community

3

Oxford First-Generation students have launched an Alumni Community, which aims to bring together former, first-generation students to inspire and enable current and prospective undergraduates.

The group already has over 70 members a week since the launch. Many have expressed interest online in mentoring current first-generation undergraduates, giving talks at the University, and offering work experience.

“First-gen” students are those who are “the first in their family to go to university”. The group is also for the student who “feels they do not have the same educational privileges as someone whose parents went to university in the traditional sense.”

A spokesperson for the group, Jack Nunn, told Cherwell: “Our alumni campaign is all about creating a sense of community and showing that first-gen students not only exist at Oxford, but succeed in all kinds of careers and fields.

“There is no typical ‘first-gen’ student and our alumni members who have signed up so far reflect this.

“Amongst the first-gen alumni, there are PhD students, teachers, lecturers, lawyers and scientists. Most importantly, they all share a common background and have overcome similar barriers.”

One of the first alumni sign-ups, Becky Shaw Simms, came up to Oxford in 1996 and read Geography at Mansfield College. Although she stayed in the local area after graduation, she has never been involved in any Oxford alumni groups before.

Simms heard about the Community over Twitter.

Speaking to Cherwell, she said: “When I was at Oxford there were Target Schools programs and all kinds of outreach, but of course the world is a very different place now – in 1995 when I was applying, there was no social media, very little internet usage, no smartphones etc, so the networks that today’s young people benefit from didn’t exist. If there was a First Gen group in 1995, I’m not sure how I’d have known about it!

“I was the first person in my family to finish school with qualifications of any sort, brought up by a single parent in local authority accommodation.

“However I was bright at school, knew I loved my subject, and was lucky enough to have a Head of Geography at school who was able to get beyond the assumption that Oxford was only for ‘posh kids’.

“More often than not, historically, the reason bright people from state schools, BME communities and disadvantaged communities haven’t been represented at Oxford is that they’ve not applied to Oxford in the first place – either because their school hasn’t encouraged them (or has actively discouraged them!) or their peers have put them off.

“Or (frankly) they’ve been put off by endless Oxbridge-bashing in the media that perpetuates the myth that Oxbridge is Brideshead Revisited, with a homogenous population of people who are white and middle class and educated at private school and if you’re not, you won’t ‘fit in’.

“Sadly the journalists at the Guardian et. al. don’t care to look at the statistics from Colleges like Mansfield where over 90% of undergrads last year were from state school backgrounds.”

Alongside the Alumni Community, Oxford First Generation Students will be putting on pizza nights, socials, and ‘informal formals’ for incoming freshers.

The Oxford SU Class Act campaign has also recently introduced a ‘Family’ scheme, which aims to group students from different years together who are from first generation, low income, or working class backgrounds.

Review: Charly Cox ‘She Must Be Mad’

0

I was disappointed recently, listening to an interview with Zadie Smith, when she revealed that she carries around a 90s’ flip phone and boycotts social media. She has a lot of good reasons for shunning both technology and social media for the sake of her productivity and sanity, and I agree with most of what she says. However, it made me think about a pervading sense of resistance in literature to accurately reflecting technological modernity and the dominance of social media; and whether writers and artists should reject or embrace something which is so often seen as an impediment to the enjoyment and creation of ‘real’ art. Then I saw Charly Cox’s latest book of poetry, She Must Be Mad, on the Instagram story of an ‘influencer’ I follow. For a fiver I downloaded it straight to my phone on a whim, even though I thought it might be the kind of stuff that is aesthetically pleasing on a feed but lacking in any depth. I was wrong to be sceptical. I can imagine the likes of Smith and other literary technophobe’s possible reticence at the (relatively new) concept of an ‘insta-poet’ like Charly Cox. Along with others like the well-established Rupi Kaur or Brian Bilston (on Twitter),’insta-poets’ are launching hugely successful books and accruing followers into the hundreds of thousands or even millions, just from the popularity of their poetry online.

The beauty of insta-poetry is its potential to be shared. Of course, this too comes with its own problems of ownership and remuneration, whilst often demonstrating a concerning desire to simplify work in order for it to be digested quickly. But it also means that young women who otherwise wouldn’t feel compelled to read poetry  are now being exposed to work which resonates with their own experiences as women today. More importantly, alongside poets like Cox, it provides a much-needed platform for women of colour, the LGBTQ+ community, and those who aren’t from wealthy ‘literary’ backgrounds to be read – all you need is an Instagram account.

The most shared of Cox’s poems on social media seems to be ‘I wish I’d not spent so long crying in bed; which captures perfectly and simply the realities and regrets that come from living with a mental illness: ‘…I fear too much/ To think back to/ When I wanted less/ I fear too much/ To see the mess/ Of how much time/ I wasted/ When I had plenty left.’ Both Cox’s poetry and prose (of which there are a few examples in She Must Be Mad) is often simple and repetitive in its form and style, perhaps reflecting the immediacy and cyclical nature of a life in which we are all tied to our phones; so much so that the reader can imagine her writing them in the bathroom at a party on her notes app.

But the accessibility of Cox’s poetry does not negate its emotional resonance. The book is divided into four sections, the first of which is loosely themed around love and sex. In this Cox speaks to the experience of young women who feel conflicted about expressing their sexuality when misogyny still threatens, but in a more nuanced, hidden way. She implores us, as well as her past self: ‘Don’t try and fill the void with empty consumption/ This moment in time that you’ll lie and say was sweet seduction/ Was another episode of you orchestrating a personality reduction.’ In stream-of-consciousness prose piece entitled ‘love part 1’ she reflects on a relationship that grew from equal part real-life and social media interaction: ‘It’s five thirty-six in the morning four years later. Lights still dim, faces still rounded in the glow of the laptop. Girlfriends once stalked are now ex-girlfriends discussed.’

Cox, who has Bipolar II, is at her most vulnerable, raw and funny when writing about mental illness. She in no way idealises or simplifies the reality of it here, but in her stark style conveys the daily experience of those who suffer. In ‘all I wanted was some toastshe laments: ‘I got a fork stuck in the dishwasher/ And now I can’t stop crying/ Whoever said depression was glamorous/ Had clearly never considered dying/ Over a peanut butter/ covered utensil.’ She also devotes much of the book to body image, and conveys the anguish and anxieties of growing up in a society obsessed by women’s appearance: ‘When our bodies are trailed through media’s dirt/ When school is not about grades but the length of your skirt/ If I’m half a size smaller will I be liked first/ I’ve only had liquids so how do I quantify thirst/ When sex isn’t about love but ‘how much did it hurt?’

Cox didn’t study English or creative writing formally, and instead she cut her teeth as a producer for well-known YouTubers and as an online consultant. This has left her lacking in any kind of pretension, and instead able to directly speak to the legions of young women who spend a huge chunk of their lives online. I’m sure that some critics would find a few of her poems a little trite and their subjects banal; but some of this is to be expected in a 23-year-old’s debut, which is also highly confessional. For me, her universality and direct address to the reader in poems like ‘kindness’ reminds me of populist poets of previous generations like Mary Oliver, whilst her discussion of the female experience lend themselves to comparison with Carol-Ann Duffy. However, there is only so far comparison can go – and Cox certainly represents a new generation of talent able to convey the complexities and nuances of life in the age of social media.

How to get into Oxbridge 101

1

As students are forced out of their colleges as soon as exams finish in week nine of Trinity term, college accommodation is desperately sought by all sorts of enterprises and institutions. Among them are several private companies which organise residential summer camps in Oxford and Cambridge, giving well-off prospective applicants the chance to experience the life of an Oxbridge student for a fortnight.

With costs easily reaching over £2000 per week, expectations for such summer camps are inevitably very high. Parents around the world willingly disregard the words of warning hastily crammed at the bottom of the company’s webpage in barely visible italic characters: “We are in no way affiliated with the University of Oxford or its constituent colleges”.

Students and parents alike believe that these camps can give them what they truly seek: the secret behind an infallible application. Whether it be wise words to improve a wonderfully spontaneous “personal” statement, mock interviews or simply the fact of physically being in Oxford, the success of these camps relies on convincing families around the world that participants will have a much higher chance of getting into Oxbridge than would otherwise be the case.

Countless internationals like myself will have at least been tempted by such summer camps, particularly when their Facebook news feeds are filled with aggressive targeted advertising for such experiences. Undoubtedly, the daunting price tag must have sparked up discussions at dinner tables all around the world. During these conversations, the sneaking thought may have arisen: “What if my child is given a magic formula which will pave their way straight into Oxford? Surely, then, this investment would be worth it…”

And so it is the case that bus-loads of 17 year olds from across the globe wind up together for two weeks admiring the spires, punting and dreaming of what being a student in such a place must be like. To their dismay, no special secret of success is handed out to them because, as we know, there simply isn’t one. Two weeks and a few grand later, they head home realising that the only secret behind getting in is hard work, dedication and, perhaps, a considerable amount of good luck.

I will not deny that a similar (but thankfully cheaper) experience made me feel rather misled. I spent two weeks at an academic summer camp at a high-performing UK school, and whilst I had a fantastic time, it did not alter my application prospects at all. The truth is that these camps exist because they are incredibly profitable for both the organisers and for the colleges, not because they benefit participants’ application chances.

Is this really the best that colleges can do with their free rooms over the summer? By letting these private summer camp companies rent college rooms, colleges themselves are complicit in duping prospective applicants into departing with large sums of money for no benefit. And if these camps do somehow advantage participants in the Oxbridge application process, would it not be fairer for colleges to focus on giving students from less privileged backgrounds similar experiences? For instance, colleges could rent rooms to these summer camps on the condition that they give free or discounted places to students from low income households. Regardless, Oxbridge summer camps provide little benefit to students and solely serve the interests of the firms themselves.

#Merky: the world of celebrity imprints

0

With celebrity culture growing faster than ever these days, it is not uncommon to walk into a bookshop and find the shelves lined with the latest autobiographies of musicians, comedians, reality stars, or YouTubers. Releasing a book seems to be a standard step on the road to success, with many celebrities earning up to six figures for their life stories or latest novels. Now, an offshoot of this trend is forming through imprints, where celebrities are choosing to curate high-profile collections in collaboration with major publishing houses. Penguin Random House, perhaps the most influential publisher in Britain, has recently announced its newest celebrity imprint in the form of #Merky Books, curated by the Grime star Stormzy. #Merky will, in the musician’s own words, be used as a “platform for young writers to become published authors” through competitions, as well as offering a paid internship in 2019.

On the surface, this project sounds promising, as it will offer a platform to writers to whom such an influential publisher might not otherwise have been accessible. Having won multiple awards for his music, having been labeled a political influencer, as well as having amassed a substantial fortune all by age 24, Stormzy represents a modern success story. Perhaps through his curation, Stormzy will be able to lend a helping hand to the next generation of writers who might, like him, find success in their art.

In this way, celebrity imprints could hold greater cultural significance than just another celebrity memoir. The publishing world is still dominated by white, middle-class authors, so perhaps Merky Books would give minority writers a greater opportunity to release works. Indeed, this is not the first imprint released by Penguin Random House, they have also collaborated with the likes of Lena Dunham, best known for her role as director, writer, and star of the show “Girls”. Her imprint “Lenny Books” was developed from her Lenny newsletter, releasing Jenny Zhang’s “Sour Heart,” a collection of coming-of-age stories from the perspective of immigrant women in America in 2017, as well as “Courage is Contagious,” a series of essays about Michelle Obama. Sarah Jessica Parker, star of the series “Sex and the City” has similarly collaborated Penguin Random House with her own “SJP for Hogarth” imprint, recently publishing the novel “A Place For Us” by Farheen Mirza.

Yet this notion of innocently offering young writers a chance to be published by Penguin seems perhaps too good to be true. I find myself wondering if the publishing giant would have considered any manuscripts by said young authors had the Stormzy label not been attached to them. In today’s world, it is silently accepted that making it in the arts is near impossible without the glamour of celebrity to clutch onto. Social media following, in an almost dystopian fashion, instantly equates to relevance and popularity – the success of the Kardashians is often evidenced by their number of Instagram followers. An obvious example is Kylie Jenner becoming the youngest self-made billionaire, promoting her products simply on social media without ever paying for traditional advertising.

This obsession has dominated the world in such a way that it seems, as demonstrated by celebrity imprints, the necessary way to succeed as an author is to clutch onto any scrap of celebrity fame available to you. There are often whispers here and there that publishing is dying, which makes this attempt to stay relevant by Penguin all more the more obvious. Whilst, on the one hand, it is a step in the right direction – as mentioned before, it could act as an opportunity for young writers to get published – yet the branding of this imprint prevents it from being simply an idealised and innocent project to introduce young writers to the world, as crucially it benefits from being a collaboration with an incredibly popular artist. By attaching themselves to as big a name as Stormzy, Penguin can cash in on these new artistic projects as if they were merchandise. This is made more obvious by the announcement that the first book to be released with #Merky is Stormzy’s own autobiography “Rise Up: The #Merky Journey So Far,” promising never-before-seen insights into the star’s career.

Ultimately, if Stormzy and Penguin Random House are able to find the writing stars of tomorrow, then all the branding was worth it. However, perhaps next time the opportunity could be offered without relying on the promise of a big name behind it.

The Booker Prize: a sure-fire selection or a shot in the dark?

0

In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Man Booker prize, the Booker Prize Foundation launched a one-off Golden Man Booker prize, which, on July 8, crowned Michael Ondaatje’s The English Patient (the 1992 winner) the best work of fiction ever to have received the award. And, if the single objective of the Man Booker prize – to select ‘the best novel in the opinion of the judges’ – has remained the same since the award’s inception in 1968, then it would hardly seem far-fetched to label Ondaatje’s novel, which was shortlisted by five judges but finally voted for by the public, a ‘modern classic’.

Indeed, Bloomsbury has dubbed The English Patient as ‘the very definition of a modern classic’. ‘Profound, beautiful and heart-quickening,’ as Toni Morrison describes it, the novel, which is set during World War II and focusses on the revelations of an English patient’s actions prior to his injuries, ticks many of the boxes on the modern-classic checklist. It is based on a world the reader recognises as at least partially familiar, and has merited widespread, if not necessarily lasting, recognition. It was also written after the cataclysmic events of World War I and II, which undoubtedly altered the way the world saw itself: whilst classic themes of love, hate, life and death endure, they are viewed through the lens of such modern atrocities. In this instance, the Booker prize’s efforts to discern what the classics of our time are seem to have been fruitful.

Yet this begs the question, are the annual winners of the literary prize always deserving of the title ‘modern classics’? And does the award function simply to uncover the classics of our time, or give them the recognition necessary to turn them into such? Thomas Keneally’s Schlinder’s Ark (the 1982 winner) points towards the latter. Keneally himself linked the award to the public’s acceptance of the book and its subsequent infiltration into wider culture, ultimately facilitating Steven Spielberg’s creation of a multi-award-winning film adaptation, Schlinder’s List (1993), which took over $321 million worldwide on original release and has embedded the story into the minds and hearts of many.

The award could also, of course, be said to uncover the novels with modern-classic potential, and watch as they fulfill such promise. But when many of the prize’s winners have sunk into oblivion (who now sings the praises of PH Newby and Bernice Rubens?), and when many now-distinguished modern classics have lost (think Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and McEwan’s Atonement) or been neglected altogether (such as Welsh’s Trainspotting), it looks increasingly likely that the selection and subsequent success of Schlinder’s Ark was simply down to chance, as opposed to any of the judges’ astute intuition. Keneally’s own conviction that the book’s enduring fame was merely ‘lucky’ only underscores the seemingly arbitrary nature of which Booker prize-winners turn out to be modern classics, and which never quite attain such a title.

That the prize resembles a lottery in many ways seems almost inevitable when taking into account the selection process. Starting with an advisory committee, which usually consists of a writer, two publishers, a literary agent and a bookseller, amongst others, there is already a hint that, as the UK publishing industry sets out to benefit from the prize, the prize is not solely concerned with identifying the ‘best’ book, but also the most marketable. The advisory committee then chooses a judging panel of literary critics and writers, as well as the likes of journalists and politicians, who get the final say.

Yet despite Booker’s insistence that their ‘common man’ approach to choosing juries is ‘why the “intelligent general audience” trusts the prize,’ the notion that a select number of people could correctly make an inherently subjective decision only reinforces the unreliability of the prize’s verdicts. Author Amit Chaudhuri points out that the judges ‘have to read almost a book a day’ before coming to a conclusion, prompting his labelling of the award as ‘absurd’. A. L. Kennedy, a 1996 judge, went as far as to call the prize ‘a pile of crooked nonsense,’ with the winner being determined by ‘who knows who, who’s sleeping with who, who’s selling drugs to who’. If we (rightly or wrongly) factor bias into the process as well as chance, J. M. Coetzee’s description of the Booker as ‘the ultimate prize to win in the English-speaking world’ rings somewhat hollow.

This is not to say, of course, that the Man Booker prize has nothing going for it. The award has brought well-deserved attention to renowned modern classics such as Yann Martel’s Life of Pi (the 2002 winner) and Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Remains of the Day (1989), and it would be unfair to suggest that just because not every winning novel has infiltrated into wider culture, the prize is equivalent to a simple lottery-draw. Whilst it may not be a flawless means of discerning what the modern classics are, it is a meaningful stepping-stone towards being able to make such a judgement – a judgement that is, finally, intrinsically subjective by its very nature anyway. Booker would perhaps be wise to incorporate the vote of the public into each year’s decision-making process as a means of reducing the role that chance and bias play, rather than restricting it to the Golden Booker prize alone.

‘Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again’ review

0

It’s Saturday night in my small provincial hometown. I’ve been back home from Oxford for a month. There are only so many times I can listen to Sean Paul’s Temperature in our one nightclub before I lose my shit. Trump’s recent visit and this heatwave mean I am increasingly worried about the twin crises of fascism and global warming. 

I need the sweet release of ABBA, I need Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again.

The story picks up about a year after the first. Sophie (Amanda Seyfried) is trying to bring her mum’s dream of opening their beautiful Greek hotel to fruition, despite Donna (Meryl Streep) having died off-screen soon after the first film ended. The film cuts between Sophie’s struggles to reunite the old cast for a grand opening, and flashbacks of how young Donna (played exuberantly by Lily James) met each of Sophie’s three dads on her journey to find the Greek island we now know and love.

Despite most of the songs this time around being ABBA’S failed B-sides, the musical numbers are still surprisingly good (in a bad way). My favourite has to be the reprisal of ABBA’s 1974 Eurovision-winning hit, ‘Waterloo.’ Taking place in a restaurant filled with dancing waiters dressed in Napoleonic garb, the staging makes ABBA’s profound and transhistorical extended metaphor between the 1815 Battle of Waterloo and the realities of love in the seventies come alive. ‘The history book on the shelf/ is always repeating itself’ – how right they were. 

Meryl Streep was incredible in the original film; she approached the performance of every ABBA hit like a Shakespearean soliloquy, with dead seriousness and true professionalism. So I am nearly as devastated as Pierce Brosnan (who forlornly stares at photos of her for most of the film) at her untimely and mysterious death before the film’s opening. The lack of Meryl, however, is made up by Lily James, who, whilst shagging her way around southern Europe, copes incredibly well with the implausibility of the plot, looking like she actually believes it. (If I was her I would have asked why neither Donna or her three lovers had any condoms?) 

I also refuse to believe that Julie Walters and Christine Baranski, wandering around the island in matching kaftans, getting massages from handsome Greek men, and ultimately both getting snogged, are not the icons of 2018 we deserve. 

And just when you might begin to tire of it all, Cher appears in the last twenty minutes to bring the whole endeavour home. I will not hear a word against her, her rendition of Fernando, or the fact that she is meant to be playing Meryl Streep’s mother despite being only three years older than her.

It is worth briefly mentioning that this is a film about a load of wealthy, straight, white people cavorting around a Greek island with an eerie lack of actual Greek people, and very few people of colour in any speaking roles. Although it is arguably important to problematise this (and what it says about the film industry), Here We Go Again, along with its predecessor, has made millions of people (not all of whom are wealthy, straight, or white) happy, and such escapism in itself is no bad thing. 

Interestingly, other critics seem to have been unusually kind to the film, too. This is weird because as much as I loved both films, in terms of objective quality, Here We Go Again (aside from some swish cinematography and the odd self-aware flourish) is definitely worse than the first: as I said, there’s a consummate lack of ABBA bangers (the first film used most of them up), the plot is even more ridiculous than its predecessor and built to crowbar in as many ABBA songs as possible, and Pierce Brosnan is still literally the worst singer I have ever heard. A cynic might suggest that critics today are less likely to criticise something popular with women and the LGBTQ+ community, fearing the wrath of collective millennial outrage and accusations of snobbery. Or perhaps, in these trying times, they have just realised that there is nothing wrong with incredibly fluffy, extremely watchable escapism.