Saturday 2nd May 2026
Blog Page 788

Universities minister repeats call for ‘sanctions’ over access data

0

Universities minister Sam Gyimah has threatened Oxford that it may face sanctions over access inequality, as the fall-out from the university’s first-ever undergraduate admissions reports continues.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Gyimah said that “very hard levers” were available to the new Office for Students if the University’s admissions statistics did not improve.

Gyimah, who was elected as president of the Oxford Union in 1997, also called for Oxbridge to make more use of ‘contextualised’ admissions.

Gyimah said: “The numbers that we are seeing now disappoint me, and it’s disappointing because it’s been going on for too long.

“Years ago we were having the same debate about Oxford and Cambridge as we are today, and that is very disappointing.

“I don’t think they’re doing enough…It is staggering that we have the best minds in our universities and we still do not know what the best way is when it comes to applications.”

Gyimah, the Conservative MP for East Surrey, stressed that the Universities could face monetary sanctions if they fail to meet targets.

“The new regulator for universities, the Office for Students, has access and participation remits with every university, and they will have stretching targets,” he said.

“They will have to deliver against these targets set by the regulator, who can ultimately fine them.”

Gyimah’s comments come weeks after the Chair of the Education Select Committee, Robert Halfon, called for sanctions if Oxford and Cambridge failed to address their “social justice problem.”

Halfon said: “I would like to see the elite universities properly being held to account for the numbers of disadvantaged students they admit – and the support they receive whilst studying.

“Perhaps we should regard universities as elite only if they are providing a real ladder of opportunity to the disadvantaged. Maybe universities should only be seen as ‘the best’ when they lead their students to well-paid job destinations and reduce Britain’s skills deficit.

“The new Office for Students must lead in this. There must be sanctions from the new regulator for those universities who are failing in this regard.”

In March, the Higher Education Standards Agency (Hesa) revealed that Oxford accepted fewer applications from poor neighbourhoods in the 2017-18 academic year than any other mainstream institution.

Just 2.8% of the University’s intake were from students who live in areas classified as the most difficult to engage in higher education.

Gyimah also called for the universities to consider more ‘contextualised’ admissions, after other Russell Group universities including University College London, King’s College London, and York introduced schemes to improve the uptake of disadvantaged students.

Gyimah said: “There are rules to this game, and there are some schools from the age of 12,13, that are schooling their students…so that when they get to A-levels it is part of their DNA.

“If you go to a school where this is not the system at all, you find it very difficult to catch up. You’re quite smart, you’ve got the potential, but there’s no one there to help you.

“What Oxford should be doing is helping those schools who do not have those inbuilt systems, to actually develop those advantages in those schools. If you don’t know those systems, you don’t have a hope of getting through.

“I think it is right that they take into account a broad range of factors, not just the performance in the tests.”

BAME JCR presidents recreate Bullingdon photo

16 current and former BAME JCR presidents and one ball committee president have recreated the infamous 1988 Bullingdon Club photograph, shot on the Christ Church stairs.

The 2018 photograph, entitled “Presidents of Colour”, was taken with the intention of emphasising Oxford’s progress in terms of diversity and access in recent decades.

Photoshoot organiser and newly-elected Lady Margaret Hall JCR President, Joshua Tulloch, told Cherwell: “The Bullingdon Club is symbolic of the elitism which haunts Oxford University. In staging this photo we want to show that Oxford is no longer just for a white elite. It’s for everyone.”

The photoshoot comes after news that 41% of Oxford colleges with JCRs will have a BAME JCR president next term.

According to Tulloch, nine BAME students were elected this term as JCR president for the upcoming academic year, while four BAME students currently hold JCR presidencies until Hilary next year. This means that a total of 13 BAME students will hold JCR presidencies for the first term of next year, and at least nine students following that.

This represents nearly half of JCR presidencies across the 31 Oxford colleges that have JCRs.

The new JCR presidents at Worcester and New College, Ephraim Conteh and Kendya Goodman respectively, are each one of the two black students admitted to their respective colleges in the past two years.

A joint statement sent to Cherwell, signed by 20 current and former BAME JCR presidents, stated: “We hope that it signals the beginning of real and meaningful change for BAME students at Oxford.”

It continued: “Our election has been exceptional, but such positive representation is unlikely to continue without wholesale self-reflection on both a personal and institutional level from all members of the University, and an active, pronounced commitment from staff and students to making Oxford a safe and inclusive environment for all University members, irrespective of their race or ethnicity.”

“The difficulties BAME applicants face in getting a place at Oxford and the representation of Black and minority ethnic students among the body of JCR Presidents are two separate issues which should not be conflated, so as not to use the latter to undermine the urgency and importance of the former.

“It is intellectually dishonest to reduce the issues BAME students face at Oxford to a matter of access, as if once they arrive they are no longer imperilled by prejudice. Racism and discrimination are still significant problems within the student body which must be addressed if we are to transform Oxford into a genuinely welcoming environment for BME students.

“Ultimately, we want our presence as JCR Presidents and this campaign to show any BAME sixth formers thinking of applying to Oxford that there is a place for you here, that Oxford is changing, and that you too can thrive here.”

The newly elected presidents plan to work with the University and the SU “to ensure that our election is not perfunctory, but rather that it has genuine and positive consequences for BAME students at Oxford, and for any potential applicants.”

To this day, the Bullingdon Club remains an invitation-only, all-male, and traditionally all-white drinking society. Its wealthy members are renowned for their extravagant banquets and destructive behaviour.

The 1988 photograph became a symbol of Oxford’s entrenched elitism when it went public in 2010. Two of the posing members, Boris Johnson and David Cameron, were Mayor of London and Prime Minister respectively at the time of release.

The following statement accompanies the BAME presidents’ photograph.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then what can these two pictures tell?

In 1987, a photograph was taken. A photograph which embodied a world of inherited privilege, the excesses of elitism, and the exclusive structure of social and political power. An image that does not accurately reflect our view of contemporary British society.

In 2018, we took a different photograph. A photograph which represents the victories borne out of an ongoing struggle, the opening of doors once firmly closed, and the growing commitment to diversity in the halls of power. It is an image that, we hope, signifies how far this institution has come in the intervening years, and anticipates the future progress yet to be made.

BAME individuals comprise 41% of the 2018/19 cohort of JCR Presidents, despite only making up 17.9% of the UK-domiciled student population. We stand as testament to the individual and institutional recognition that diversity is not just inevitable, but also powerful and beneficial. It is evident from student-led access initiatives such as the Afro-Caribbean Tyler Prize and the African and Caribbean Society’s Access Programmes that there is a real, popular desire to effect structural changes in Oxford, and the results of the latest round of JCR elections – in which nine BAME presidents were elected – only serve to embolden our endeavour.

The progress that we’ve made – as embodied by the changing faces of student leaders – is indeed heartening. But this by no means exonerates Oxford; it is still responsible for perpetuating structural inequalities. Nor does this absolve the education system of its role in systematically disadvantaging BAME and lower socioeconomic background individuals in their attempts to access a world-class education.

However, we hope to show that, despite pervasive narratives, you too can be included in a space once defined by exclusion. Though we are few, our ambition is uninhibited; our drive, unsequestered; our aspirations, unrestrained.

As Presidents of Colour, we represent how it is possible to thrive at Oxford. We show that if we are allowed to approach these dreaming spires, then we will climb to the very top. May the halls of power – once grey – be filled evermore with colour, diversity, and culture.

#PresidentsOfColour

Oxford eight joins Wasps rugby academy

0

Blues eight Will Wilson has joined the Wasps rugby academy, after a successful run out with the England sevens team in April.

Wilson, a finalist historian at Keble, has appeared in two Varsity matches and made a number of A League appearances for Wasps during a previous spell with the outfit.

He has impressed at both university and international level this year, converting for the Blues in the Varsity match and scoring for the national side at this year’s Hong Kong sevens.

He told Cherwell that: “Being approached by Wasps came as a bolt from the blue, but it was ultimately an opportunity I couldn’t pass up.

“I’m really excited to test myself against some of the very best in the country (and indeed the world), and can’t wait to get stuck into training and playing for the academy side. Hopefully this will perform as a platform for bigger and better things to come!”

He joins the academy alongside 20-year-old winger Callum Sirker. Wasps academy manager Jonathan Pendlebury said: “It is great to be able to add two talented players like Callum and Will to our Senior Academy squad for next season. They have both flourished in their time away from the club and we cannot wait to have them back in the Wasps setup.”

“Adding Callum and Will means we will have a larger 14-man Senior Academy squad next season, which will enable us to play a fuller role in first team training as an academy group. The pair, along with other senior academy players will have early opportunities to impress in the Premiership Rugby 7s and the pre-season development XV fixture vs Coventry ahead of the season.”

Wilson has plenty of experience at a high level, having previously captained an England U18 tour to Samoa and won three Blues for Oxford. He played at flanker in the Oxford side that won 12-6 in 2015, and started at eight in the 2016 and 2017 defeats, scoring a try in the latter.

Uni ‘encouraged’ by Home Office’s commitment to review overseas student policy

0

Oxford University have said they are “encouraged by the Home Secretary’s comments” regarding a reassessment of the inclusion of overseas students in net migration figures.

Earlier this week, Home Secretary Sajid Javid said that he would “like to look at again” the policy that includes international students within the government’s drive to reduce net migration into the UK, admitting that he did “empathise” with the view that it did not give a welcoming impression.

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Oxford has always maintained that the very best international universities are those that are able to attract and recruit the very best students, wherever they come from.

“We have lobbied the government not to enact policies that will be detrimental to world-class universities.  We are encouraged by the Home Secretary’s comments this week and look forward to hearing more detail from him.”

General secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), Sally Hunt, said it was “encouraging” that Javid “appears to recognise how unwelcoming our current policy is”.

“However, we need that policy looked at again as a priority,” she added. “Our universities’ international student recruitment is a huge success story because overseas students are attracted by the quality of higher education available. International students make an enormous contribution to UK higher education both educationally and economically.

“Sajid Javid should take the lead on this and support universities by committing to remove international students from the net migration target altogether.”

Universities UK (UUK), the representative organisation for the UK’s universities, also welcomed Mr Javid’s comments. A spokesperson said: “Removing students from the net migration target would be a positive policy change as part of a package of measures to signal that the UK is a welcoming destination for international students. We welcome the home secretary’s commitment to review this issue.”

Hollie Chandler, senior policy analyst at the Russell Group, added that while “there is no limit on the number of international students who can come to the UK, including them in the target is unhelpful and sends the wrong message to prospective students abroad”.

Oxford’s Migration Observatory has published research showing that the majority of the public tend not to think of students when they think about migration, despite students representing the largest group of migrants coming to the UK.

Pedestrian hit by bus on High Street

0

A woman has been taken to hospital after a bus crash on Magdalen Bridge around 3pm today.

Cherwell understands she was rushed to John Radcliffe Hospital in a serious condition.

Police closed the bridge, causing considerable traffic delays and disruption to the bus timetable.

Oxford Bus Company has admitted that one of its buses was involved in the incident. Spokesman Greig Box Turnbull told the Oxford Mail: “We can confirm one of our City3 buses was involved in an incident with a female pedestrian on Magdalen Bridge at 2.15pm.

“An investigation will be carried out to understand how it happened. We are liaising with the emergency services and will help in any way we can, this will include reviewing our CCTV footage. Our thoughts are with the lady who was taken to hospital and our driver.”

Oxford beats Cambridge in QS uni rankings

0

Oxford has beaten Cambridge in the 2019 QS World University Rankings, placing among the top five universities worldwide.

According to the rankings, Oxford is the UK’s best university and the 5th best university globally. It is the first time since 2015 that Oxford has ranked in the top five institutions globally.

Oxford and Cambridge have swapped positions in the rankings this year, with Oxford rising from 6th place to 5th and Cambridge dropping from 5th to 6th.

US universities retain the top four positions; MIT topped the table followed by Stanford, Harvard, and CalTech respectively.

QS ranks the world’s top 1,000 universities, which typically come from over 85 countries.

Oxford’s rise is mostly due to an improvement in its research performance. Its score for Citations per Faculty – QS’s measure of research impact – rose from 76.3/100 in last year’s edition to 83.0/100 this year. It also retained a score of 100/100 for Employer Reputation.

QS World University Rankings 2019: Top 10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Stanford University
Harvard University
California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
Imperial College London
University of Chicago
UCL (University College London)

 

Oxford vice chancellor, Louise Richardson, said: “I am delighted that Oxford has risen in this year’s QS rankings. We owe this result to the talent and commitment of our academic staff and to our network of research collaborators across the continent and across the Globe. We are particularly proud to have secured the top spot in Europe and very much hope that we will be able to maintain this position as the UK withdraws from the European Union.”

A QS spokesperson, Jack Moran, said: “This year’s results reiterate Oxford’s status as a truly world-class institution in all respects. It enjoys outstanding renown among both academics and employers.

“Its highly international status is testament to its global standing. And no university in the country achieves a higher raw research impact, with its citations footprint higher than all others.

“However, for students at the university, it is equally important that the world-renowned tutorial system remains facilitated by one of the world’s lowest faculty-student ratios: in this respect, Oxford is relatively – and happily – anomalous among UK institutions, the majority of whom are suffering from increasing class sizes.”

Oxford’s Bronze Award for Racial Diversity is an undeserved accolade

0

Oxford University draws scrutiny much like a summer picnic draws wasps: it is almost inevitable but is nonetheless somewhat disruptive. A particularly popular topic for criticism of Oxford is diversity, and at this point you could probably measure the passing of time in the number of scandals, reports, or initiatives that relate to this important issue. None of them change how I think about the application process, and none of them seem to say anything that we did not already know. Frankly, I’m growing sick of reading about them. Letting reports, awards and enraged news stories lead the discourse on diversity only hinders any actual progress. Yet, the latest addition to the deluge of discussion on Oxford’s access problem seems rather more optimistic than much of what has come before it: Oxford has been given a Bronze Award for Racial Diversity from Advance HE.

When I first read this I was a bit confused. Just reading the title ‘Bronze Award for Racial Diversity’ evoked images of participation awards that the more athletically inept among us would be given at our primary school sports days. Well-meaning as I am sure it was, it is hard to see what this sort of tokenistic pat on the head is really doing for the thousands of young people that miss out because of the social system that fails them.

The constant reports only compound the issue: we all know that there is a problem, and re-emphasising it does not promote progress. Statistics can be pulled in and out of focus to suit the writer. My own college sent a laughably self-congratulatory email with a bullet point list of the supposed advancements in diversification they had unearthed in the latest report, but one only needs to scan a copy of any student paper to realise that this is not the full story. Such reports frequently weaponise student experiences and narrowly define groups of Oxford students on the basis of their demographics and backgrounds. When we place such emphasis on categorisation and quantification of marginalisation, we burden such groups with the full weight of the baggage that they are deemed to be carrying. Essentially what we are seeing seeping out of these statistical cesspits is identity politics transposed onto Oxford admissions.

Furthermore, the kind of narratives that are extracted from statistics are generally more for convenience than accuracy. One I have read a lot over the past week is that if we make the application system meritocratic then the problems will dissolve: the proponents of this narrative are sorely mistaken. What they fail to recognise is that due to hours of preparation, years of superior teaching, and a more rigorous focus on soft skills, candidates from more affluent backgroundsarebetter at the tasks of the application process so decontextualised meritocracy will not help. The problem is not that the system is biased at the point at which students meet it, but that long before Oxford was even on the horizons for most students, the quality of education being provided was inadequate. These reports place a magnifying glass over Oxford, when Oxford in itself is a minute part of a systemic problem. Such reports shift a disproportionate proportion of the burden for solving the diversity issue onto an institution that in many ways simply cannot.

I am not arguing that we should never investigate diversity, and I am not arguing that efforts to solve the problem are futile. Simply, it is clear that number crunching is producing and reinforcing unhelpful paradigms of thought about Oxford admissions and education as a whole. These reports can say pretty much what you want them to if you spend long enough tinkering with the numbers. They have their place, but we should not let them dominate the way that we talk about diversity at our university and in our society. If we care about the diversity issue in our university, then as students we should try and get involved at the earliest possible stage to facilitate real opportunity for talented students.

Is the publishing boom ‘a sign of cultural vitality’?

1

A few years ago, it seemed that the favourite conversation topic of the literary world was the decline of the printed book. There was no shortage of those who were willing to proclaim the death of the book, insisting that the prevalence of online information and transference of texts to an online format would render the format obsolete. Sociologist Frank Furedi wrote about the ‘Gutenburg parenthesis’ in his 2015 book Power of Reading – the concept that ‘books’, as a literary form, had a limited lifespan, and that the rise of the internet is driving us back to an oral culture. With the increasing ease of the ability to promote one’s own views online, it would seem that books had had their day. 

Nonetheless, according to statistics released by the Publishers Association, books sales actually rose the year Furedi suggested that the printed book was declining. Moreover, the number of digital copies sold decreased for the first time in history. The self-publishing industry has also boomed over the past few years. The bibliographic information company Bowker has stated that ISBN registrations leapt with a 21% increase from 2014 to 2015, and publishing continues to be a fast-growing industry. The fastest grower in the publishing field is audiobooks, and the industry has been valued at around $2.8bn in 2015. To most readers, this huge increase in the production of literary material should be a cause for celebration – if we are publishing more books, surely we are publishing a wider variety of books for readers to enjoy. The ability of writers to self-publish should, in theory, mean that readers should be exposed to a wider range of books than ever before. 

But it’s possible to argue that this rise in publishing –  if anything – has made the industry more streamlined, and less diverse. You just have to look at the shelves of high street booksellers to appreciate the cookie-cutter approach which retailers have taken to publishing in recent years. The same sort of celebrity (auto)biographies, young adult fiction, and thriller novels all dominate the shelves. In part, this is the fault of an increasingly narrow market, which results from enormous competition between publishers. The abundance of eCommercial retailers    such as the enormous amazon.com –  has resulted in the availability of a huge number of easily available and inexpensive books. The domination of the audiobook publishing field by behemoths, such as Audible, results in a further monopolisation of the content which is released, leading to less diversity despite the increase in releases. The ever-increasing demands of consumerism in the internet age results in the proliferation of published works. A 2014 report from the International Publishers’ Association revealed that the UK was the country that published the highest number of books per capita by a significant margin. In response, literary agent Jonny Geller,  at leading publishing firm Curtis Brown said to the Guardian at the time that this was “either a sign of cultural vitality or publishing suicide”. 

This is not to say we aren’t publishing anything new, important or interesting. Last year saw the releases of Samantha Rooney’s debut novel Conversations with Friends, Reni Eddo-Lodge’s Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race, and Man Booker prize-winner Lincoln in the Bardo. There are clearly good and original books being written all the time, but in a competitive market, it’s a struggle for unknown authors to get published. In order to keep pushing for diverse content, it is clearly important for book-lovers to support new authors, as well as indie publishers more likely to be approached by an up-and-coming writer. Making use of independent bookstores, which are likely to stock lesser-known authors, is crucial in supporting the underground publishing market not dominated by corporate giants. The only type of publishing death in the UK will be self-inflicted by the reader.

Romeo and Juliet – Preview

SquidInk Theatre’s production of Romeo and Juliet at the Keble O’Reilly this week places the tale of gang warfare in a female offenders unit: HM Prison Verona. It is a production that promises to challenge audience preconceptions of the Shakespearean canon, as well as advance a conversation about women in the Criminal Justice System.

The prison setting lends itself well to depicting gang violence and claustrophobia, and the almost exclusively female cast is of paramount importance in encouraging a reevaluation of characters that have become ‘stock’ for many, such is the ubiquity of Romeo and Juliet. I was shown two of the most famous scenes: the Queen Mab speech, and Romeo (Lorelei Piper) and Juliet’s (Emelye Moulton) encounter at the Capulet party, which was a brave choice from the crew, but one that, in general, paid off. Consumed by her imagination in reciting the Queen Mab speech, Romeo and Juliet’s fellow inmate, Mercutio (Lucy McIlgorm) momentarily escapes from the quotidian misery of prison life. Viewed in the prison context, one may also perceive Mercutio as a character who has experienced a past trauma. An advantage of staging Shakespeare is that the audience is likely to know the plot, and watching McIlgorm’s performance reminds you of the great loss that Mercutio will be to the play when he dies.

I was initially wondering, in a predominantly female cast dressed identically in white shirts and grey tracksuits, whether characters would be easily ‘recognisable’, but this was no problem. Admittedly, I was speaking to director Conky Kampfner about casting before the preview, but McIlgorm’s performance could only have been attached to Mercutio, and contrasted well with Romeo’s forlorn complaints. Capulet’s (Imogen Edwards-Lawrence) entrance to the party, parading proudly from the balcony, signposted the character’s dominance at this stage of the play.

The prison setting does not necessitate the dazzling set design of the party scene made famous by Luhrmann’s film. This makes the task of creating the correct atmosphere more challenging, with responsibility falling entirely to the actors to create the excitement. More energy was perhaps needed to convey the revels, but to portray decadence in a prison context is difficult. This production remains true to the prison setting, and the result was a depiction of prisoners relaxing in each other’s company, rather than a wild party scene, but perhaps this was intentional in encouraging  the audience focus on the claustrophobic conditions of the setting.

This did not mean that there was a lack of creativity in use of the set. Props were sparse: a bunk-bed, barbed wire, steel beams, a table, and a translucent curtain. Tybalt (Lara Deering) seethes with anger from behind the table when she notices Romeo, whilst inmates dance seductively either side of her. Romeo and Juliet have their first encounter behind the translucent curtain. This worked particularly well in its suggestion that, from the beginning, their love does not belong to quotidian world. It is certainly not of the world that this production depicts. References to “holy palmers” and “saints” in the moments before their first kiss seem particularly incongruous in this setting, where the omnipotent figures are gang leaders. This is underlined by Capulet’s lingering on the balcony as she enters.

One issue lay in the transitions between scenes. The noise made in moving the table after the party scene distracted from the moment when Romeo realises that she has just kissed a Capulet. It was a shame to have attention taken away from Piper’s performance. However, this was a very minor flaw in a promising production. The cast seemed very close, and this sense underlined the ensemble aspect of the play, and reminded me of how multiple characters share responsibility in causing the lovers’ deaths. Kampfner was keen to underline her interpretation: that this is a play where young people are let down by their elders. Even in their isolation, there was very much the feeling in these scenes that the old, arrogant and ignorant were stifling the protagonists’ chances of happiness.

SquidInk Theatre have produced a show that unafraid to challenge audience preconceptions. It is ambitious, and promises to deliver.

St John’s JCR declares war on LMH

0

St John’s College JCR declared war on Lady Margaret Hall JCR yesterday in response to the latter declaring war on Sweden. LMH’s JCR maintains that the Scandinavian country is responsible for the college’s bop ban this term.

In the interests of the war effort, LMH has also voted to start a nuclear arms programme and initiate a process of granting their JCR president power to single-handedly pass legislation and to dismiss and appoint members of the executive committee.

The St John’s motion stated that “the granting of legislative powers to the president is a worrying move towards dictatorship,” appealing to the college’s duty to “protect the democratic integrity of the University’s JCRs.”

The JCR war urged to “honour current and former students’ commitment to preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by any means necessary.”

The motion resolved to “mandate the JCR President to commence ‘Operation LMH Freedom’, which will aim to invade LMH, shut down their nuclear programme and restore democracy within the LMH JCR by deposing and bringing to justice so-called ‘Field Marshall Tulloch’.”

St John’s JCR President, Christine Jiang, told Cherwell: “As a bastion of freedom and democracy, I’m heartened to see that St John’s JCR have picked up on LMH’s egregious violation of the Rome Statute. We do not accept unilateral declarations of war nor the threat of nuclear arms, and will not stand by idly while Sweden’s national security is undermined.

“St John’s currently employs a falcon, Missy, and a falconer, to address the extensive pigeon problem in Tommy White Quad. I expect that Missy will be weaponised as part of our Armed Forces.”

A fourth year chemist at St John’s, Dan Sowood, was alone in opposing the motion.

Sowood told Cherwell: “Despite my impassioned speech to the contrary, I am sad to say that the Motion passed with large majority. With the small amount of remaining time I have here, I intend to vigorously and wholeheartedly pursue peaceful negotiations between any and all parties as an alternative to the actions proposed in this Motion.”

Another St John’s student, Charlie Clegg, told Cherwell: “I’ll admit to being somewhat mercenary in support of or opposition to war against LMH. Having previously stated that war would be good, however, I now agree that peace is better. I hope LMH ceases hostilities with the Kingdom of Sweden, not least because ABBA are re-forming and I’d really hate for anything to jeopardise that.”

Whilst others appear to take the coming war quite seriously, Alfie Deere-Hall, the motion’s proposer, sees it as a joke.

When asked about how he reconciles his proclaimed pacifism with his motion, he told Cherwell: “I believe that LMH ‘declared war’ on Sweden as a joke; in the same way, my motion to declare war on LMH in response is a joke. Student politics needs to be fun; the laughter which greeted my motion and my speech strongly imply that the joke was funny.

“My pacifism does not, I contend, need to be reconciled with my motion.”

LMH Field Marshall Josh Tulloch (who until recently held the title of “President”) and the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs have been contacted for comment.