Sunday, May 25, 2025
Blog Page 826

‘Kingsman’: The sequel’s disservice

1

When Kingsman: The Secret Service was released back in 2015, it was hailed as a refreshing departure from its action film counterparts. It had a killer sense of style, likeable and, at times, well-developed characters, and dealt with themes of class prejudice, social mobility, loyalty, and political extremism, although often ham-fistedly. A lot of these things are present in The Golden Circle but their impact has diminished, falling victim to that curse as sequels often do.

To put it simply, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is a confused mess of a film. There are so many ideas being juggled that not one of them is fully developed. The sharp parody of the genre is still there, but The Golden Circle spends so much time clinging to the success of its predecessor – many of the original gags are recycled – that it verges on excessive self-parody. Indicative of this is resurrecting Colin Firth’s ‘Galahad’ after he was shot at point-blank range in the first film, which of course saps any impact that death scene had. Some of this self-parody is admittedly clever, at its best when it subverts the audience’s expectations. As a whole, however, the film lacks the audacity to play to the strengths of its new ideas. By far the most interesting concept in The Golden Circle is the interaction between the British ‘Kingsman’ and the American ‘Statesman’. But Statesman’s involvement is so inconsequential that it comes across as an afterthought. Here was the potential for some ingenious humour, potential which is criminally squandered.

In fact, I have no idea what the focus of The Golden Circle is. This is not helped by the fact that barely any of the events of the film carry the emotional weight they would have possessed in the original. Brutally killing off vital members of Kingsman at the very beginning of the film should be a tragic event but the characters forget them so quickly that, by the end of the 140 minute romp, I had forgotten them too. That said, one scene towards the end of the film is a huge exception, proving that, given enough time and good enough writing, Kingsman can still deliver tragic moments.

A good microcosm for The Golden Circle’s problems is its villain, played by Julianne Moore. She is eccentric for the sake of being eccentric, comes out of nowhere, and her plan is absurd. Samuel L. Jackson’s villain in the original was a complete cartoon character, for sure, but his motives were fleshed out and he served as a good comparison to Eggsy with his nouveau riche style acting as a contrast to the old money air of the Kingsman organisation. The similarity between this new egomaniac stuck in a reconstructed 1950’s America and the President of the USA is a witty statement about the image-fuelled, back-stabbing nature of American politics. Aside from that however, this villain is just placed into the story without any satisfying explication of her grudge against Kingsman. Is it because they are a threat? Then why does she not eliminate Statesman too, the organisation operating in her own country? It is a mess.

Yet, for all my rambling, The Golden Circle still has the spirit of Kingsman at its core: an indomitable sense of style, punctuated with bonkers fight scenes, a sublime soundtrack, and masterful use of slow-motion which knows exactly when to bring down the pace for dramatic impact. One fight at the end of film is a technical and choreographic marvel, filmed in a single shot, a technique which never fails to make me grin the whole way through. It is just unfortunate that the fight scenes were never the best parts of the original Kingsman, while here they clearly are.

That is the best summary of Kingsman: The Golden Circle I can give. While the original was a clever parody satirising the tropes of conventional action films, The Golden Circle is just an action film. It is a very enjoyable action film but the baffling plot and mishmash of neglected concepts left me asking, like Eggsy, “not who, but why?”

Revoking Aung San Suu Kyi’s honorary degree would be meaningless

0

Aung San Suu Kyi was, until recently, something approaching a saint in the eyes of the world. As both an activist and symbol, she has had considerable success in the quest to bring democracy to Myanmar.  Her reputation has fallen quickly from these lofty heights as the plight of the Rohingya has become obvious. The Annan report noted that the Muslim Rohingya minority has been oppressed within Buddhist-dominated Myanmar for years. They lack citizenship and other basic rights.

Anger over this marginalisation appears to have come to a head with attacks on border posts in 2016 which the government in Myanmar blames on Rohingya extremists. The military response has been overwhelmingly violent with thousands of refugees fleeing in what has been described by the UN as ‘textbook ethnic cleansing’. These refugees are fleeing military attacks which have destroyed villages and killed many. The Burmese military is a powerful political force but it no longer dominates as it did in the years of the Junta. Aung San Suu Kyi stood up to the Burmese military for many years when she did not hold high office. In this context, the bland call for an investigation in her speech (19th September) is so disappointing.

The debate has raged since then on whether the assorted awards she has won in recognition of her activism, including both a Nobel prize and an honorary degree from Oxford, should be taken away. It seems obvious to point out that a failure to act to prevent suffering makes us complicit in that suffering. This applies to all of us but some, in this case Aung San Suu Kyi, have the power to do more. Her refusal to condemn the actions of the military and police in Rakhine state will help prolong the crisis and cause more suffering. In short then, she seems no longer to possess the courage and kindness that first brought her acclaim and accolades. Others may be guiltier but they are not renowned for her qualities. We cannot expect those we regard as heroes to be perfect but the longer her inaction continues the more it begins to resemble complicity.

Taking her various awards, however, can be seen as a mere distraction from the problems of Myanmar. We have no guarantee and very little reason to assume that taking away any awards will put pressure on her. The focus on the issue of Aung San Suu Kyi’s degree then reveals either arrogance or naivety. Do we believe that the power of our approval alone is sufficient to change things in Myanmar? I would hope not. There seems then to be an overwhelming interest in preserving the ‘sanctity’ of the award. Oxford, a world-famous and globally-leading institution cannot have its honours and awards borne by a person who has failed so cataclysmically as Aung San Suu Kyi, we are told.

This arguably valid interest cannot help by appear self-indulgent now that hundreds of thousands of refugees have entered Bangladesh. There almost seems to be a fear that not taking the degree away would amount to a form of approval, but this too is illogical. Rhodes, for example, a man whose actions and ideology most would today condemn, has a statue in Oxford. And yet we worry about the message that a piece of paper sends?

This debate over the issue of her awards seems to be evidence of western self-obsession rather than of concern for the condition of the Rohingya. We seem to be scared that the tarnishing of our symbols of approval will do damage to us. But our consciences will be far more troubled if we fail to move beyond this self-indulgent concern for symbolism and act practically to help the Rohingya. This crisis is nearly a year old and as its anniversary approaches, we seem no closer to finding a solution or to helping Bangladesh deal with the refugees. In short, inaction and symbolic arguments are not going to help anyone. It is time that the Rohingya came first in the eyes of the world. Otherwise, this crisis might see many more anniversaries.

Marc Jacobs, Sir Ian McKellen and Anthony Scaramucci among this term’s Union speakers

2

Marc Jacobs, Sir Ian McKellen and Anthony Scaramucci are among the speakers that will appear at the Oxford Union this Michaelmas term, Cherwell can exclusively reveal.

Singer Emeli Sandé and American film director J. J. Abrams are also set to appear.

They are some of the first names to be revealed from the Union’s term card of individual speaker events, which includes figures from the world of fashion, sport, and politics. The list will be released in full on Sunday.

Figures of note include a joint address by Marc Jacobs and Edward Enninful, heavyweights of the fashion industry: Enninful is the incoming editor of British Vogue and Jacobs is known for his fashion label and range of fragrances.

Prominent American politicians are also due to speak this term, with Donald Trump’s loudmouth former director of communications Anthony Scaramucci appearing in second week and veteran US Senator Orrin Hatch speaking in November.

The actor Sir Ian McKellen, known for his appearances in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, will return to the Union following a famous appearance in 2014 which saw him recite the legendary Gandalf line: “You shall not pass”.

J. J. Abrams, the director of the Star Trek reboot and latest Star Wars films, is among the rest of the highlights from the world of film. The American actress Liv Tyler will also be appearing.

The Union has announced an open period up to 19 October, when all Oxford University and Brookes students can attend debates and speaker events for free. Access to events after this date is limited to members.

The full release is expected on Sunday.


Who’s speaking

Marc Jacobs and Edward Enninful


Fashion lovers will be delighted to see veteran designer Marc Jacobs speak alongside British Vogue editor Edward Enninful on Friday 6 October at 20:00.

Creative director of Louis Vuitton until 2014, Jacobs is best known for his fashion label and line of retail stores. Enninful took over British Vogue after Alexandra Shulman’s retirement earlier this year.

Kevin Rudd

Twice Labour prime minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd is a heavyweight figure in Australian politics who oversaw his government’s apology to indigenous Australians after winning a landslide in the 2007 election. Forced to resign following internal tensions, Rudd was a candidate for Secretary-General of the United Nations and is now a Senior Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Rudd will speak at the Union on Wednesday 11 October at 20:00.

Anthony Scaramucci

Popularly known as “The Mooch”, Scaramucci was appointed Communications Director in the Trump White House on July 21, before a controversial interview led to his firing just ten days later.

The Mooch was also previously accused of connections to a Russian investment firm by CNN, although these allegations were ultimately retracted.

Scaramucci will speak at the Union on Monday 16 October at 20:00.

J. J. Abrams

The director behind the Star Trek reboot and the latest Star Wars films, J. J. Abrams has a storied career in science fiction both on the big and small screen.

Abrams won two Emmy Awards for the hit TV show Lost, and through Star Wars: The Force Awakens is the director of the third highest-grossing film of all time.

He will speak at the Union on Wednesday 18 October at 20:00.

Sir Ian McKellen

Photo: Jack McGuire

Cambridge alumnus Ian McKellen, best known for his roles as Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings and Hobbit trilogies and as Magneto in the X-Men films, is an English actor who has in recent years become a champion of LGBT rights.

McKellen, from Burnley in Lancashire, began his career in theatre in the 1960s, but became widely recognised for his film roles in the 1990s.

Patron of Oxford Pride and a co-founder of Stonewall, Sir Ian McKellen will be speaking at the Oxford Union on Wednesday 8 November at 20:00.

 

Emeli Sandé

Emeli Sandé.

Scottish singer Emeli Sandé was studying for a Medicine degree at Edinburgh University before shooting to fame in 2011 with a host of chart-topping songs including ‘Read All About It’ with Professor Green and ‘Beneath Your Beautiful’ with Labrinth. Her debut album, Our Version of Events, was the biggest-selling album of 2012, shifting over one million copies.

She released her second album Long Live the Angels last year, and was awarded Best British Solo Artist at the 2017 Brit Awards. Earlier this year, she was also decorated with an MBE for services to the music industry. Her songwriting career has seen her pen songs for Rihanna, Leona Lewis and Tinchy Stryder, among others.

She will be speaking at the Union on Monday 13 November at 20:00.

Orrin Hatch

Photo: United States Congress

Utah senator Orrin Hatch is president pro tempore of the United States Senate and most senior Republican senator, in office since 1977.

A long-term advocate of balanced budgets, Hatch is notable for sponsoring several constitutional amendment attempts to ban budget deficits.

As president pro tempore of the Senate, Hatch is the second highest ranking official in the Senate and is empowered to preside over the Senate in the vice president’s absence.

Hatch will be speaking at the Union on Friday 17 November at 17:00.

Monica Lewinsky

Photo: Damon Winter/The New York Times, provided by the Oxford Union)

American activist and fashion designer, Monica Lewinsky rose to fame after President Bill Clinton admitted to having an “inappropriate relationship” with her whilst she was working as a White House intern in the 1990s.

Press coverage of the ensuing scandal saw Lewinsky engage in a number of public ventures including a line of handbags and an advertising role for a diet plan.

After completing a master’s degree in psychology at the LSE, Lewinsky has since become a social activist speaking out against cyberbullying.

Lewinsky will speak at the Union on Thursday 16 November at 15:00.

Liv Tyler

Model and actress Liv Tyler first achieved critical recognition for her role in Stealing Beauty, but achieved widespread fame with her portrayal of Arwen in the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Making her television debut on the HBO series The Leftovers, Tyler has served as a Unicef Goodwill Ambassador for the United States. She will appear in the BBC miniseries Gunpowder alongside Kit Harrington next year.

Tyler will appear at the Union on Wednesday 29 November at 17:00.

Christ Church student who stabbed boyfriend avoids jail

2

Lavinia Woodward, the “extraordinary” Christ Church medical student who stabbed her boyfriend, is to have her future at Oxford decided by the University after receiving a suspended jail sentence.

Woodward stabbed her then-boyfriend, a student at Cambridge University, in the leg with a bread knife after punching him in the face. She also threw a laptop, glass, and jam jar at him in the attack on 30 September last year.

The 24 year old gained national notoriety after crown court judge Ian Pringle QC in May appeared to suggest that she would not receive prison time, prompting tabloid headlines such as “too clever for prison”.

He said: “It seems to me that if this was a one-off, a complete one-off, to prevent this extraordinary able young lady from not following her long-held desire to enter the profession she wishes to would be a sentence which would be too severe.”

Pringle sentenced Woodward today to a 10-month sentence, suspended for 18 months, meaning she will not go to prison unless she commits another offence.

Woodward will not return to university this year, and is reported to be considering continuing her studies abroad, because she is now “too recognisable.”

In a statement to Cherwell today, Christ Church Dean Martyn Percy said: “We note that Lavinia Woodward has been given a suspended sentence as a result of her conviction for unlawful wounding earlier this year. As a College we are concerned for the welfare of all our students, and it is clearly a matter of regret and sadness when any young person blights a promising career by committing a crime.

“Ms Woodward is not currently studying at Oxford, having voluntarily suspended her medical studies. The question of her future will now be decided by the University, which has procedures in place where a student is the subject of a criminal conviction.”

Sentencing Woodward at Oxford Crown Court today, Judge Ian Pringle told Woodward: “There are many mitigating features in your case.

“Principally, at the age of 24 you have no previous convictions of any nature whatsoever.

“Secondly, I find that you were genuinely remorseful following this event and, indeed, it was against your bail conditions, you contacted your partner to fully confess your guilt and your deep sorrow for what happened.

“Thirdly, whilst you are a clearly highly-intelligent individual, you had an immaturity about you which was not commensurate for someone of your age.”

Revealed: Oxford Union debates speakers for Michaelmas 2017

1

A former Dragons’ Den star, a firebrand left-winger, and the leader of the Liberal Democrats are among the debates and socials speakers at the Oxford Union in Michaelmas 2017, Cherwell can reveal.

Sir Vince Cable, Theo Paphitis and Ken Livingstone will appear in debates at the famous society across the term, discussing issues including the future of the EU, populism, and the ideal of of true love. Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry and American lawyer Jeh Johnson are also set to appear.

Throughout this week, Cherwell is exclusively revealing the details of the Union’s term card for the upcoming term, ahead of a full release listing individual speakers on Sunday.

Sir Vince, Thornberry and Labour MP Hilary Benn will lead the proposition in the traditional No Confidence debate in first week. They will face Tory MP Damian Green on the opposition, with two reportedly high-profile names yet to be announced.

Later in the term, Secretary Jeh Johnson, Barack Obama’s former head of homeland security, will join Anthony Romero, director of American Civil Liberties Union, in a debate on liberty and security which will also feature the former French Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve.

Former Dragon’s Den star Theo Paphitis will face off outspoken Tory backbencher Anna Soubry and former Liberal Democrat leader Paddy Ashdown in a debate on whether the “decline and fall of the EU is upon us”.

A full list of names of debates and their speakers can be found below, with further releases of individual speaker events being released by Cherwell later this week.

Among the names announced is Ken Livingstone, the controversial former London mayor who came under fire during a visit to the Union last year for his comments regarding anti-Semitism. He will be joined in a debate on populism by Arron Banks, one of the biggest donors to Ukip and the Leave.EU campaign.

Other notable political figures include Natalie Bennett, known as much her infamous “mind blanks” as for her leadership of the Green Party during the 2015 general election, as well as the Shadow Secretary of State for International Trade, Labour MP Barry Gardiner.

From second week, attendance to the debates is members-only – requiring students to splash out £269.86 on a life membership – but the Union allows card-carrying Oxford University and Brookes students to attend events for free during its open period which runs to 19 October.

The details of the Union’s programme of social events throughout the forthcoming term has also been announced. It includes an Olympus black tie ball on 3 November, an ‘Into the Movies’ social on 27 October, and a Wine and Cheese social on 20 November.

Zach Quinto will host an LGBTQIA+ welcome drinks on 4 October.

Among other details to be revealed include a LGBTQIA+ welcome drinks hosted by the Star Trek actor Zach Quinto on 4 October. Further welcome drinks will be held for Brookes students on 1 October, internationals on 3 October, graduates on 6 October and debaters on 7 October.

The Union will also hold a ‘Students Essentials Fair’ on the Friday 6 October and Saturday 7 October.

The Union’s individual speaker events, which feature the most high-profile figures, will be revealed later this week.

 

No Confidence Debate – 1st Week

Hilary Benn will speak for the proposition. (UK Parliament/Attribution License 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)

The House Has No Confidence in Her Majesty’s Government (12 October)

Proposition: Hilary Benn, Sir Vince Cable, and Emily Thornberry

Opposition: Damian Green… The Union was unable to announce the other speakers until Monday of the week of the debate “due to the sensitive nature of scheduling requirements”

True Love Debate – 2nd Week

This House Would Abandon the Ideal of True Love (19 October)

Proposition: Simon Blackburn, Amy Webb

Opposition: Richard Cowles, Charly Lester

Liberty and Security Debate – 3rd Week

This House Believes We Have Sacrificed Our Liberty for a False Promise of Security (24 October)

Proposition: Secretary Jeh Johnson, Anthony Romero

Opposition: Bernard Cazeneuve, Avril Haines

Climate Debate – 4th Week

Barry Gardiner MP. (UK Parliament).

This House Believes Individual Apathy is the Greatest Threat to Our Climate (2 November)

Proposition: Barry Gardiner MP, Minister Barbara Hendricks, Sir David King

Opposition: Secretary Ernest Moniz, President Mohamed Nasheed, Natalie Bennett

Populism Debate – 5th Week

Ken Livingstone.

This House Believes Populist Leaders Deliver No Real Change (9 October)

Proposition: Ferenc Gyurcsány, Tulip Siddiq MP

Opposition: Ken Livingstone, Arron Banks

Media Debate – 6th Week

Damian Collins MP. (UK Parliament/Attribution 3.0 License).

This House Believes Social Media Undermines Good Journalism (16 November)

Proposition: Damian Collins MP, Steven Erlanger

Opposition: Ben Smith, Adam Boulton

European Union Debate – 7th Week

Anna Soubry. Image: UK Parliament.

This House Believes the Decline and Fall of the European Union is Upon Us (23 November)

Proposition: Theo Paphitis, Thierry Baudet

Opposition: Anna Soubry, Paddy Ashdown, Sir Julian King

Dido, Queen of Carthage at the RSC review – ‘Daring, poignant and powerful’

0

Despite being the first play of theatrical behemoth Christopher Marlowe, Dido, Queen of Carthage has scarcely been performed since its original debut in 1587. An operatic version was produced in 1794, then promptly lost in the Drury Lane Theatre Fire, and the National Theatre offered a version in 2009, but otherwise there have been very few notable adaptations of the play in theatrical history. Consequently, the RSC’S decision to revive this under-performed tragedy as part of the Rome season was a bold one – but, ultimately, one that paid off in spectacular style.

The narrative, based on books 1, 2, and 4 of Virgil’s Aeneid, recounts the tale of Dido, the newly established queen of Carthage, who finds Aeneas and his troop of Trojans shipwrecked on her coast, fleeing the wreckage of Troy in search of Italy. While the Aeneid focuses on the political and historical significance of Aeneas’ journey, with his experience in Carthage merely a pit-stop, Marlowe realigns the focus to sharpen Dido’s individual story, and in doing so transforms a plot point into a self-contained tragedy.

Of course, extracting a single story-arc from an epic is always going to be a difficult task, and Marlowe’s use of the classical original reads a little bit like intellectual masturbation at times. He includes reference to a wealth of minor characters (e.g. Turnus, Aeolus) who play an important role in Virgil’s poem, but contribute nothing to a play centred on Dido . The amount of exposition required to justify Aeneas’ arrival in Carthage also results in a tonal disjunct between the two halves, with the second half containing the majority of Dido’s story and most of the emotional high points of the play, and the first half mostly trying to justify the dramatic landscape. This exposition also incorporates the introduction of subplots that are never resolved – for example, Juno’s jealousy over Jupiter’s affection for Ganymede, and Venus’ interest in Ascanius –  which adds an unnecessary level of complexity if you have not read the Aeneid, making it harder to place the characters we do see on stage in the context of the wealth of classical myths that are alluded to.

The RSC’s impressive production, however, goes some way to circumvent the difficulties presented by the text through the use of costumes and staging. The individual qualities of the gods are never explained fully in the text, so Cathy Hill’s costume design includes kitsch allusions to their archetypal characteristics; Venus (the goddess of love) wears a red ball gown, Hermes (the messenger god) has a set of wings attached to his crown, while Jupiter wears a suave white suit, not dissimilar to Morgan Freeman’s style as God in Bruce Almighty. The staging is also effective; given that the Swan Theatre has an in-the-round set, Kimberley Sykes’s imaginative use of the space (especially in the final triadic scene between Dido, Anna and Iarbas) should be admired.

Lots of the directorial decisions are also effective at rejuvenating the classical material, especially Sykes’s decision to have the gods walking among the audience before the show begins, injecting a metatheatrical element that really emphasises the hierarchy of the divine and mortal characters. It is perhaps interesting to consider the way the divine/ mortal relationship reflects the relationship between audience and character; in a lot of classical texts, the presentation of the gods spectating the lives of mortals from a position of superior knowledge is not dissimilar to the position of the audience as the play begins, and aligning the divine characters with the audience in contrast to the spectacle of the mortal figures is a clever decision that emphasises the futility of Dido’s hopes and prayers against the rage of the god in the machine.

Even disregarding the artistic directorial choices, the RSC’s interpretation would stand up as a powerfully emotive production off the strength of the actors alone. In typical Marlowian fashion, the aspects of the story with the potential for drama are heightened to maximum emotional impact (e.g. the addition of Priam being maimed before his death), which makes for multiple emotional high points over the course of the play. Consequently, Aeneas’ description of the fall of Troy is narrated by a powerful monologue from Sandy Grierson, who, along with the other Trojan characters, brings a convincing sense of urgency to the cast of shipwrecked refugees. The stand-out performance, however, comes from Chipo Chung as Dido. Her tragic final scene is a hard one to execute convincingly, yet Chung manages it masterfully, reconciling the powerful external status of Dido’s achievements as a leader with her internal breakdown, portraying the dignity of a spurned woman in a way that at no point vitiates her strength.

The supporting cast are also incredibly strong. Amber James is arresting as Anna, Dido’s love-torn sister, and Achates, played by Tom McCall, is notably impressive in his support and admiration for his leader, even through moments of doubt over some of his decisions. The divine characters are also skilled at providing some comic relief in between the emotive events that take place in the mortal world, with Ben Goffe’s portrayal of Cupid standing out in particular. The rivalry between Juno and Venus, played convincingly by Bridgitta Roy and Ellie Beaven, also brings to mind a 16th century version of Made in Chelsea in the way it manifests itself in feigned conciliation and eloquent bitchery, a vibe that is reinforced by their black-tie costumes. Similarly, the opening scene between Ganymede and Jupiter adopts the darkly comic humour that has characterised the RSC’s Rome season, which establishes a dissonantly comic hallmark, meaning that the nonchalant disaffection of the gods only serves to reinforce the tragedy of the mortals in comparison. It is a shame the gods do not feature as heavily in the second half, but that fault lies with the script and not the production.

Aside from the intensified melodrama, the majority of the plot is surprisingly true to Virgil, which makes it a greatly gratifying play to watch if you’re familiar with the Aeneid. The success of the RSC’s production, however, lies in the fact that you don’t have to be versed in the classics to appreciate the human tragedy at the core of the narrative, and Sykes’s ability to make Marlowe’s verbose vaunt accessible is surely impressive. Even if you are unfamiliar with the material, this clever and bold adaptation from Kimberley Sykes is about as cool as Dido, Queen of Carthage can realistically get, and her achievement in bringing the tragic story of a complex and strong classical heroine to a modern audience should not be understated. A daring, poignant and powerful production that does phenomenal justice to Dido’s sorry story.

My town and my gown: chickpeas and televised murder

0

A mere 40 minute drive may separate the two, yet striking cultural differences exist between Oxford and South Buckinghamshire.

Having arrived in Oxford for the first time, I was immediately disorientated. I stared at passers-by on Broad Street, wide-eyed and horrified. The masses of bicycles, sure, I understood. I had used such contraptions to get around at home – two wheels, a slight death wish, goes fast. Makes sense. It was the city’s other favoured method of transportation – walking – that truly confused me. Never before in my life had I seen people walking to places of actual purpose.

In Buckinghamshire, you see, walking usually gets you only to (another part of) the countryside, a pub, or your MP’s second home. Walk ten minutes in one direction, you hit a field, walk 20 minutes in the opposite direction, you hit another. It’ll be greener than the first. With a bus service on life support, South Buckinghamshire is one beautiful, yet uneventful, overpriced Countryfile calendar (note: there’s a train to London). In Oxford, however, I was amazed to find that you could get to places on foot – places where things actually happened. The prospect was rather dizzying. The realisation that I would see a 4×4 car perhaps just once a week, rather than four times a day, itched my brain. Uncomfortably.

If that wasn’t enough change to cope with, my eyesight started to worsen in the city. Something was messing with my vision, and I was seeing parts of the colour spectrum I’d never seen before. It had first appeared in the fringes of my view but now was visible everywhere, especially around my college, Balliol. I soon came to terms with what I was seeing – it was the colour ‘red’. It was an unfamiliar sight, exceedingly rich in tone. Sure, my parents had once told me that colours other than blue existed, but they had remained unclear, mocked, unexplained. The optician told me there were no problems with my retinae. It was just a processing dysfunction, derived from political colour-washing, that was mending itself. I told her that I had previously never seen a red seat in my entire life. She laughed.

She proceeded to ask me whether I was suffering from any side effects – “Headaches? Migraines? Nausea?” I replied saying that I was experiencing a newly questioning conscience. Since arriving in Oxford, questions such as “Was it actually ok for my MP to claim expenses on dog food?” and “Is High Speed Two really more important than my friend’s paddock?” had kept me up all night. The optician laughed at me again, assuring me that my mind was radically reordering for the better. She advised me that it would be for the best if I didn’t try to speak in the JCR until the process was completed. I readily obliged.

I began to fear that Oxford and Buckinghamshire shared no semblance of each other. Middle-class embers of hope, once brightly glowing, were now dull flakes. Refusing to believe this to be the truth, however, I forced myself to find things that made home feel a little closer.

I found most of these things on the shelves of Botley Road’s Waitrose. But what I failed to find in the supermarket was even more poignant. This year a catastrophe of unforgettable proportions arrived at our doorstep. It struck the taste buds and sanity of Oxford’s inhabitants as badly as those belonging to residents of the home counties – I speak solemnly of the Hummus Crisis of April 2017. A wicked metallic taste tore through our produce indiscriminately, leaving our shelves barren and us weeping, together, in the deli aisles. United in sorrow, we mopped up our tears with sauce-less rye bread, dry as the Sahara in spring. As one body, we grieved. Isn’t it strange how, for some communities, it is music that brings people together, or sport that defies the boundaries of age, politics and class – but, for us, it was the noble chickpea?

With hummus back in my life, perspective flooded back in too. In the form of ITV. I suppose one thing that never fails to make Oxford seem that little bit warmer on a cold and crisp evening is the channel’s murder dramas. Midsomer Murders is staple home counties viewing – it features graphic scenes of gardening shears shoved down throats, actions fuelled by the internal disputes of local bird-watching associations. They regularly film in Buckinghamshire. Similarly, Oxford – Turl Street in particular – is frequently used as a shooting backdrop for the detective dramas Lewis and Endeavour. Knowing Oxford and my home share this purpose keeps me feeling toasty in bed at night.

It seems, then, that Oxford and South Buckinghamshire aren’t so different after all. And if I do feel homesick, questionable internet speeds and beers priced at £5 a pint pull me through. Whilst walking still remains a new phenomenon, I admit that such a primitive mode of transportation seems remarkably agreeable when, at home, a £20 taxi is the standard conclusion to any night out.

The Comedy About a Bank Robbery’s Steffan Lloyd-Evans interview – “most of the time I like to make people laugh”

0

It’s fairly early in the morning when I sit down to interview Steffan Lloyd-Evans, the star of Mischief Theatre’s The Comedy About a Bank Robbery. Less than 14 hours ago I have watched Steffan, and the rest of an outstanding comic cast, perform a range of vocally and physically demanding gags with a level of energy that makes me exhausted to even think about, so I’m expecting this conversation to be slightly more demure – surely any normal human would be, you know… tired?

But apparently not. The first thing that strikes me as the interview begins is that, much like his on-stage character Sam, Steffan has an infectious level of energy and charisma that is captivating to listen to.

We begin by chatting about the play. The Comedy About a Bank Robbery is the latest outing from Mischief Theatre, the team behind The Play That Goes Wrong and Peter Pan Goes Wrong, and Steffan explains that this distinctive style is partly what attracted him to the project. “It’s a type of comedy that’s a combination of style, physical comedy and incredibly witty wordplay,” he says. “And that’s a combination that really marks it out as something a little different.”

The distinctive theatrical style is certainly an element that stands out in The Comedy About a Bank Robbery, but given that most readers might recognise Steffan from musical productions like Into The Woods and Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat, I wonder how Steffan makes the leap from singing to acting with such ease.

“I was always brought up to believe that singing meant nothing unless people believed what you were saying,” he explains. “And that was more important maybe than some of the wonderful technical things – that you could sound like an opera singer if you were lucky enough, but if nobody believed you, you wouldn’t really get anywhere.

“It is very different in style, but as long as an element of truth pervades the piece, I don’t think it makes much difference, as long as you take the audience with you wherever you go.”

The need to keep the audience with you is surely one that is integral to The Comedy About a Bank Robbery, a play that relies on sharp wordplays and occasionally absurd plot twists to maintain momentum, and Steffan’s character Sam is possibly the most important link between play and audience, as the most relatable and down-to-earth character in the almost farcical world of the script.

Explaining his character, Steffan says: “Sam is growing up in Minneapolis in Minnesota, and the town is absolutely full of crooks, so he ends up picking pockets as a way to get by. He’s sort of plodding through life, getting one up on people, until this wonderful girl comes into his life who is far smarter than he is and can run rings around him, and he ends up in this horrible, bizarre situation where he has to rob a bank in order to cover up the fact that he was in her apartment and – well, I don’t want to give anything away, but it’s sort of a series of unfortunate events for him in which he ends up in some pretty uncompromising situations”.

Can he see any obvious similarities between himself and his character? “I would love to say no. But yes, probably! I think he can be quite naïve… but he’s incredibly energetic, he’s always trying to find the good in everything and keep things ticking over, and he’s got masses of energy, which are all things I would like to think about myself. You’d have to ask my friends and see if they’d say the same.” He pauses. “I’m not sure I actually possess those qualities, maybe I just want to!”

Aside from the high level of energy required from its actors, the show also demands a lot of physical exertion, with various gags involving characters hanging off the walls and ceiling and lots of physical comedy. Surely that must be quite demanding?

“The most challenging part was the stamina… to get my body to that point took a while, for the first few months I could basically do nothing other than the show, I was a sort of walking zombie! Your body does learn though, and I’m really lucky because I come from a very physical background, I did judo for a long time and free running, and I absolutely adore physical theatre.”

Steffan’s father is also in show business, so I ask if his dad’s profession as an opera singer affected Steffan’s own desire to go into the theatre. “It’s difficult to say that it didn’t! I was around that a lot as a child, and was very fortunate to see a lot of those shows, a lot of kids don’t have that opportunity.

“I was surrounded by music, so originally the theatre was where I wanted to go, but then I realised sort of what we’ve been talking about – about the story being more important. For seven-year old me watching opera it didn’t matter what language it was in, it was whether I felt I could follow the story or not – that was how I would decide whether I was bored or loving life!”

My final question is perhaps the hardest one yet, but Steffan seems to have had this question before as he groans before answering. “My dream role? Ah, I hate this question, it’s so hard to answer! There’s a couple of plays that I’ve absolutely adored since I was young… it’s not necessarily my casting, but Eddie Carbone in A View from a Bridge, maybe Death of a Salesman – obviously when I’m much older. And John Proctor in The Crucible! I mean, who wouldn’t want to play that? I just want to scream ‘because it is my name’ as loudly as possible. Musical theatre wise, whatever comes my way. I’ve been very lucky to have done a real mix of things, but most of the time I sort of like to make people laugh.”

It’s an aim which, I can confirm, Steffan and the rest of the cast are more than succeeding at.

Catch Steffan Lloyd-Evans in The Comedy About a Bank Robbery at the Criterion Theatre, booking until April 2018.

The Comedy About a Bank Robbery review – ‘half the audience are in quantifiable hysterics’

1

The audience around me are mostly of the stereotypically middle-class theatre-going demographic – suited and booted city workers, come to catch a show after a day in the office. While there are also the usual clusters of tourists, students, and a few families, the generally older make-up of the audience is the first thing that impresses upon me, and as the curtain goes up I’m wondering if the row of businessmen in Jermyn Street suits know that they will be watching a few hours of farcical silliness, rather than the kind of hard-hitting, topical drama that I have always imagined city workers to frequent.

Certainly, I’m expecting Mischief Theatre company to have their work cut out for them engaging with this audience. It is a testament to the production, and a representative analysis of the rest of the show, that within two minutes the gentleman next to me is crying with laughter into his Charles Tyrwhitt tie.

The third West End outing for Mischief Theatre, the production company responsible for The Play That Goes Wrong and Peter Pan Goes Wrong, The Comedy About a Bank Robbery is a cathartic amalgamation of sharp wordplay, unexpected physical comedy, and some outstanding vocal work. The impressive ensemble cast manage to effortlessly hold the audience’s attention throughout a plot that stretches the boundaries of farcicality, as they tell the story of a bank robbery that takes place in a particularly criminal district of Minneapolis.

Our alliance as the audience is with the character of Sam, a young pickpocket who finds himself embroiled in a criminal ring after being discovered in the wrong place at the wrong time (more specifically, he is discovered in the apartment of a girl by her felon of an ex-boyfriend, in a side-splittingly funny scene that adeptly combines physical comedy with an excellent use of props and staging). Sam, played by Steffan Lloyd-Evans, has an endearingly bumbling energy that will win your heart – for Cherwell’s interview with Steffan please consult the Culture subsection – and the rest of the cast are equally impressive, each one displaying a powerful comic range throughout, as well as some outstanding vocal work.

Equally worthy of credit are the backstage team, whose work in bringing the set to life is truly breath-taking. We are transported from a prison, to a city bank, to an upmarket apartment in a matter of seconds, and a lot of the gags rely on the set and the props for effect. At various intervals, we witness characters being swallowed by retractable double beds, hanging off office chairs that are attached to the ceiling, and trapezing through a ventilation system that frames the entire stage, and I would struggle to think of a play in which the set is so integral to the enjoyment of the production. It is a credit to Mischief Theatre that the creative originality that defines the script extends to all aspects of the production, including the staging, direction, and musical accompaniment.

While the storyline may seem slightly absurd at times, the talented cast manage to inject it with a convincing sense of vitality, which manages to keep the narrative afloat. Miles Yekinni is particularly funny as Cooper, and Tania Mathurin’s powerful singing voice is greatly effective at helping to establish the swinging 1950s setting. Occasionally some of the jokes are pushed too far – motifs are sometimes repeated three times when twice would have been enough – but for the most part the humour is far more hit than miss, and the jokes that land really do land. At least half the audience have had quantifiable hysterics by the time the cast are taking their bows, and the standing ovation is pretty much all-encompassing.

“The storyline may seem slightly absurd at times, but the talented cast inject it with a convincing sense of vitality”

All in all, The Comedy About a Bank Robbery represents yet another hit for Mischief Theatre. The script writers – Lewis, Sayer, and Shields – have mastered a unique comic voice that combines sharp wordplay with farcical absurdity, somewhere between One Man, Two Guvnors and a Monty Python sketch, and the cast and creative team carry the story with confidence. I can finally understand why the audience is so agog with serious-looking faces laughing uncontrollably at an unexpected pun – in times like this, sometimes a bit of cathartic silliness is exactly what you need. For a night of guaranteed laughter, you can’t do much better than this carefully crafted comic concoction.

The Comedy About a Bank Robbery runs until April 2018 at London’s Criterion Theatre.

Coriolanus at the RSC review – ‘brutally minimalist but utterly compelling’

0

Comedy has been unexpected but welcome throughout the RSC’s Rome season. Following on from the hilarity of Titus Andronicus, Angus Jackson’s ultra-modern production of Coriolanus is similarly eager to engage the audience through humour. While this artistic decision may perhaps seem incongruous – Coriolanus is one of Shakespeare’s most overtly political plays, with seemingly little opportunity for light relief – the cast’s commitment to balancing light with dark is outstanding. When Coriolanus (Sope Dirisu) visits his enemy Aufidius, for example, the servants’ humorous intonation diffuses what could otherwise be just yet another tense scene.

Similarly, it is interesting to see Aufidius’ eventual acceptance of Coriolanus played for laughs. Rather than Aufidius’ speech being delivered with its usual gravity and emphasis on the severity of their past battles, James Corrigan (Aufidius) instead chooses to deliver the lines about how “I have nightly […] dreamt of encounters between thyself and me; we have been down together in my sleep,” in such a way that the audience is left not only giggling but also with a greater sense of the ‘bromance’ that briefly develops between the two. It’s an unusual interpretation that really works – not only does it make Aufidius’ ultimate betrayal all the more poignant, but moreover highlights beautifully how Shakespeare can be endlessly re-interpreted by each successive generation of actors and audiences.

The star of the show is Haydn Gwynne as Volumnia, Coriolanus’ overbearing mother. Her characterisation is superb, clearly ambitious for her son but also showing the audience glimpses of frustration. As a fiercely intelligent woman in a society where she cannot rule in her own right, this is the natural interpretation of Shakespeare’s character, but one which I have never seen portrayed with such overt exasperation before. Paul Jesson is a wonderfully grandfatherly Menenius, too, with just the right balance of eloquence and manipulation to define the character as an experienced political peacemaker.

Photo by Helen Maybanks (c) RSC

If anything, the characterisation of Coriolanus himself was slightly too sympathetic. While Sope Dirisu is certainly excellent in his portrayal of the warrior driven to and from power by his mother’s ambition, he lacks some of the arrogance necessary to explain the character’s disdain of the general populace.

Nevertheless, Dirisu and fight director Terry King must be commended for some extraordinarily compelling stage-fights; many modern productions offer more stylised interpretations of conflict, but the performances in Coriolanus are scarily believable and it seems possible that there will be bones broken by the end of the run!

A brutally minimalist set complements the war-torn setting of the play impeccably. Three enormous grill-style security shutters frame the back of the stage, with a thin curtain to distinguish between indoor and outdoor scenes. Diverse lighting effects are primarily responsible for setting the scene – lighting designer Richard Howell creates a consistent vision of a battle-scarred world in the near-future via a rich array of harsh back-lighting creating uniform patterns through the shutters, and descending metallic lamps give a sense of past splendour.

“The lighting creates a consistent vision of a battle-scarred world in the near-future”

While this does sometimes make the stage resemble an Argos advert, without it much of the setting would be lost. Soft lighting from above draws attention to a beautiful parquet floor to put the audience in mind of the corridors of municipal government buildings, while a later decision to shroud the stage in darkness with just a few patches of harsh white light upstage forces the audience’s attention to Coriolanus as he strides in and out of shadow.

Overall, this compelling production has great potential and is sure to go from strength to strength as the run continues.

‘Coriolanus’ runs until October 14th in Stratford-upon-Avon, and will transfer to London from November 6th-18th.