The Oxford Women In Business society (OxWIB) has issued a statement after hosting a โWomen in Mediaโ event, which included an interview between The W magazine global editor-in-chief, Phadria Prendergast, and Pastor Tobi Adegboyega, known for his leadership of the SPAC Nation church.
OxWIB claims in a statement posted on Instagram that an โexternal group filmed and set up the eventโ. Cherwell understands this group was The W magazine. OxWIB added that they believe the purpose of this external group was to โplatform their own media team and speakerโ and that OxWIB โdid not invite the final speaker [Pastor Tobi]โ nor โknow of his identity while he was speakingโ. The W magazine denies wrongdoing, claiming that โ[e]verything we did was approved by Oxford Women in Businessโ.
The event was presented by The W magazine and OxWIB to provide networking opportunities. Prendergast presided over panels alongside an OxWIB vice-president with participants from Forbes, Vogue Business, Chatham House and Essence. According to The W, โMs. Prendergast is a revered journalist working with some of the world’s leading brands. The intention for this event was for Phadria to provide opportunities, which it didโ. Prendergast has also previously led the Women of the City magazine, which has been accused of offering grants โthat come with a catchโ.
OxWIB told Cherwell that they had been โunder the impression [Prendergast] would be on the panel rather than the moderatorโ, but that โ[f]ive minutes before the event, plans to change the format were dictated by [Prendergast], and she decided how the questions would be askedโ. The W magazine refutes these claims, however, stating to Cherwell that โfrom the very beginning stages of organising the event alongside OxWIBโ, it was always intended โthat Ms Phadria Prendergast would co-host the panel, as it was a collaborative eventโ.
OxWIB argues that they had to accept the changed format because the event had already been delayed by the arrival of an โextensive media teamโ, brought in without OxWIBโs consent, and they did not want to delay the event further. However, The W claims that during a Zoom meeting two days earlier, they and OxWIB had โdiscussed and confirmed that we would be bringing our media team as we had speakers joining us online, as well as in personโ. The W also added that โOxWIB was very happy [with the large media presence] as they didnโt have the media equipment to accommodate this style of eventโ.
As the event drew to a close, Prendergast announced a final panel consisting of a one-on-one interview between her and a special guest. She then invited Tobi Adegboyega on stage.
Adegboyega, widely known as โPastor Tobiโ, founded Salvation Proclaimers Anointed Church or โSPAC Nationโ. He has since faced allegations of misconduct following the governmentโs decision to shut down the church over allegations of fraud. He was also a key figure in the BBC Panorama special, โConned by my Churchโ.
Listed on the OxWIB programme only as โPTโ, Adegboyegaโs attendance of the event and unique one-on-one interview came as a surprise. During the interview, Adegboyega criticised the BBCโs coverage of the SPAC Nation church and rebutted allegations that had previously been made against him.
OxWIB told Cherwell that they โonly realised Mr Adegboyeda would be speaking when he got up on stageโ, as he โwas not properly introduced at the event nor was his name on the itineraryโ. They also claim he was not included on the finalised list of speakers approved by OxWIB.
However, The W magazine argues that Adegboyegaโs attendance had been discussed on the 3rd May Zoom meeting with OxWIB. At this time it was โconfirm[ed] that he would be part of the programmeโ. According to The W, โOxWIB had only managed 15 registrationsโ by then, so it was agreed The W could โinvite up to 20 external guests including the speakersโ. The W told Cherwell that three of the speakers at the event โwere not โpre-approvedโ by OxWIB, however [OxWIB did] not seem to have any issues with their participationโ.
OxWIB claims that โwe believe we were deliberately misled into thinking that this would be an ordinary event, when in fact the intent behind it was to platform Mr. Adegboyega and provide further legitimacy for the W Magazine. We are appalled to have been used in such a way.โ
The W magazine defends their choice of including Adegboyega in the Women in Media panel, arguing โMr Adegboyega, a media matriarch[sic], was asked to be an addition to the panel because he is well versed and experienced in handling the mediaโ. The W magazine touts the success of the event and this interview, claiming Adegboyegaโs โstory on the day inspired and caused not only for many of the students revered journalists who attended to approach him for further questions and photos [sic]โ.
After the interviews and panels concluded, guests stayed around to talk with the speakers โasking for advice and exchanging contact detailsโ, according to The W magazine. Due to concerns about โthe sharing of personal informationโ between attendees and representatives of The W during the subsequent networking event, OxWIB have spoken to the police for advice. They told Cherwell they are also in the process of reporting the incident to the Action Fraud Police and intend to approach Trading Standards.
The W magazine told Cherwell โ[t]here was no guest list and on the day no one took note of attendees via OxWIB, therefore The W created a guest list on the day of every attendee on arrival whilst they received goody bagsโ.
OxWIB are advising anyone who attended the event to email [email protected], urging attendees โnot to engage with anyone you gave contact information to at the eventโ.
OxWIB told Cherwell: โ[W]e have a duty of care to our members to ensure that any personal information given out at the networking session does not put them at risk. We agree that we should be scrutinised for how this event was run and for the way we respond to it. But we also believe that media attention should be on the activities of The W magazine, Ms. Prendergast, and Mr. Adegboyega, which we entirely condemn as a society and would never have wished to promote.โ
The W magazine maintains that they acted with OxWIBโs approval and that proof of this correspondence with OxWIB is to follow.