Wednesday 8th April 2026
Blog Page 1082

Review: Common People Oxford

Curated by Bestival founder Rob Da Bank, Common People was always going to be a success. This May Bank Holiday weekend, the high-profile DJ brought a diverse selection of bands to Oxford’s South Park, as festival punters were treated to a lavish array of tunes in the sun.

And it was this array – this enormous diversity of bands – which made the weekend so exciting. As with Bestival, where last year’s line-up ranged from Lily Allen to Underworld, it was the variety between Jamie Lawson’s middle-of-the-road sentimental folk-rock and the Sugarhill Gang’s raucous R’n’B bangers that stirred excitement in a crowd likely more used to going to festivals starring either white male guitar bands, or black artists playing R ‘n’ B and hip hop, such is the disparate and closed-minded nature of the industry. Common People offered bands from all ends and sides of the spectrum, celebrating the eclectically wide scope of music that should be enjoyed together.

Katy B’s dance-inspired pop set was lack-lustre to begin with – one lone figure singing over a DJ’s backing track is never going to feel particularly inspiring. But as soon as she was surrounded onstage by backing dancers, joining them in pumping out an energetic, high-intensity routine, it was easy to see why the fun-loving Londoner had been put so high up on the bill.

It was these more high-powered sets which brought the highs of the festival. Public Enemy’s constant cries of “Middle finger to the government!” and “Let’s fight the fucking power!” got the audience in front of the Common Stage riled up to an extent that the music they played took a backseat. I was instead far more intrigued by the hype-man who stood at one side of the stage, not saying anything at all, but twisting a little white handkerchief in the air for the whole of their set.

Admittedly, Craig David’s one-man show consisted only of him standing behind some decks, singing along to backing tracks for his TS5, which started as an exclusive pre-party event at his Miami penthouse. Yet something about the heavy sun that the crowds were treated to all weekend, the hefty club hits he was playing, and maybe the excitement for his name (he is Craig David, after all!), drew one of the biggest crowds of the weekend, and certainly the one most willing to dance. This sentiment sums up the festival – a need for stark musicality or innovation was not always the case. Rather, the crowds wanted big tunes, energetic dance routines, and slick performances.

It was in fact the acts playing the smaller tented stage, The Uncommon Stage, who should be noted for their musical originality. The Oxford music magazine Nightshift curated this stage, putting local bands on a pedestal which celebrated the Oxford music scene at its very best. Esther Joy Lane was a particular highlight of Saturday’s bill, her luscious voice crafting webs above bold synth beats, with the intricate concoctions of her synthesised instrumentation becoming even more apparent when they were left to sound out around the tent without her vocals over the top of them.

As headliners, it is safe to say that Duran Duran and Primal Scream are well past their best. Their sets were fun, but Rob Da Bank’s choice to have them fill his headline slots was not adventurous. Nonetheless, the old-school nostalgia that these safe-bets brought to South Park made up a lot of the charm of the whole weekend. Having two bands that have played the festival circuit time and time again perform their well-known anthems may seem counter-productive when attempting to curate a festival that is new, diverse and largely unheard in the current British music climate. But both 80s bands got the crowd roaring and moving as much as any other, and after a sun-tinged boozy weekend, that’s all you could ask for.

Electoral malpractice plagues NUS referendum

1

The referendum on Oxford’s affiliation to the NUS has descended into chaos with allegations of electoral malpractice on both sides.

At New College, the JCR mailing list has been used to circulate pro-NUS arguments despite a ban on such use of JCR mailing lists by OUSU referendum regulations.

In another mailing-list slip-up, the NUS made use of their own NUS cardholder mailing list to circulate pro-NUS arguments earlier this week, despite this being specifically banned by OUSU’s returning officer for this campaign. The Yes-side have stressed that these were both innocent mistakes.

In Christ Church, meanwhile, No Thanks NUS posters were found to have been ripped apart. No campaigners are not entirely innocent, however, as Yes to NUS leaflets were reportedly obscured by No-side leaflets in Merton.

13335487_10209595850603100_1853771346_n

Regarding the email sent to NUS extra cardholders, an NUS spokesman said, “An email was sent to NUS Extra card holders who signed up to receive further communication from NUS. We feel we have a duty to inform card holders they will no longer be able to access this service should students vote for their union to disaffiliate from NUS.”

The NUS have since changed their position and will send out an apology to the same mailing list later today.

Becky Howe, leader of Yes to NUS and OUSU President, “We got in touch with the RO as soon as we became aware of the email, and we worked with her and NUS to ensure that the NUS sent out an apology.”

These allegations follow on from a violation by the New College JCR access officer, who emailed pro-NUS arguments to the mailing list. Campaigning via JCR mailing lists is forbidden by OUSU regulations.

Becky Howe told Cherwell that using the “New JCR mailing list was an innocent mistake that was then immediately rectified working with the RO and No thanks NUS.”

A spokesman from the Yes side further said, “While it’s clear that staying in the NUS is the best choice for access, this was unfortunately against the regulations. The access rep in question was not on our campaign list, and likely not familiar with OUSU rules.”

The No-side responded, “We were made aware of the breach of the rules quite quickly as we have a number of supporters at New College and were disappointed to learn about it. We would urge the Yes side to respect the rules, particularly in light of concerns raised at other referenda in other SUs”, a spokesman for the campaign said.

Anna Mowbray, the OUSU returning officer, has attempted to resolve this issue by sending a second email detailing the arguments of the ‘No Thanks NUS’ side to the same mailing list.

Aside from controversy over mailing lists, there has been allegations of petty behaviour concerning posters. Louis McEvoy, who originally put up the Christ Church ‘No Thanks NUS’ posters which were later torn down, told Cherwell, “Clearly [disaffiliation] is an important decision and I strongly believe that both sides should be listened to and considered; it’s a real shame that some on the Yes side don’t share this belief. I mean, above all else, ripping up posters is just a terribly petty and childish thing to do.”

13321774_827709347359975_7669440940123501159_n

Louis McEvoy broke OUSU rules himself by posting on Christ Church JCR Facebook group on Tuesday, “Don’t forget to vote in the NUS referendum today (unless you want to stay in. In which case, feel free to forget).” This breaks OUSU rules because it involves campaigning in closed groups.

Anna Mowbray, OUSU returning officer, confirmed this was a violation of the rules and said, “We have hopefully resolved the issue with the Christ Church Facebook page informally.”

Anne Cremin, leader of the No Thanks NUS maintained that the No-side mistakes have been innocent, while the Yes-side have been “flagrant violations”.

“Louis’ rule break was unfortunate but an innocent mistake – he isn’t officially involved with No Thanks NUS and wasn’t aware of the rules. As soon as we were informed of the post on the Christ Church page we contacted him to get him to remove it and the matter was dealt with quickly and efficiently.”

Though, the No side took a less forgiving tone with the NUS’s email violation. “We are disappointed by what appears to be a flagrant violation of the rules by the NUS. The NUS has demonstrated that it has no respect for the democratic rules of our student union”.

Voting for the referendum closes tomorrow (Thursday 2 June) at 6pm. Results will be released at 7.30pm the same day.

Review: Everybody Wants Some!! – antiquated male stereotypes

0

TWO STARS

Linklater’s latest, Everybody Wants Some!!, is a college comedy reminiscent of Dazed and Confused, his 1993 film that followed a cast of high schoolers through their 70s shenanigans. Now he’s hit the 80s and college: classrooms and fields are replaced with nightclubs and frat houses, populated with Space Invaders, discos and silly haircuts.

Like much of his work, the film functions as a plotless meander through 80s cliché. Linklater chooses to open with lead man Jake (Blake Jenner) rocking up to his new home (full of his baseball team mates, the only characters we really get to know) in a vintage car holding literally nothing but a box of records and a baseball bag. This sort of dreamy depiction of the 80s party life never fades; Linklater does an excellent job of curating his soundtrack, decor and outfits to get us to fondly chuckle at old times. The first extended disco scene is wonderful for this, following the crew coolly chasing down girls with idyllic success.

Sadly however, nostalgia is the beginning and end of the film’s entertainment value, largely because of Linklater’s cast of a homogeneous bunch of college baseball players. Whilst looking and sounding different, they are all the same in the two key aspects: stupidity and libido.

The film could probably be summed up with Finn’s (Glen Powell) quip, “We’re just two guys doing anything we can to get laid. That’s who we are.” The result is an unsavoury vision of antiquated male stereotypes. The disco and house party scenes, composed of the identical girl-chasing shtick every time, comprise an excessive proportion of the running time.

The most interesting character (and, perhaps not coincidentally, the only female character given any sort of attention) is only properly introduced two-thirds of the way through: given enough screen time to make you wish she was there earlier. At other points we suffer exceedingly dull 10 minute baseball scenes, in which the same menu of tired themes – competitive men in perpetual fear of various emasculations – is worked through at a mindnumbingly dull pace.

Perhaps this is Linklater’s masterstroke, painting a past of ridiculous and unsympathetic boys, but he fails to do it in anything approaching a witty fashion. Satirising perhaps, but not entertaining.

Where his films usually sacrifice structure for sprawling character studies, Everybody Wants Some!! seems like a formulaic stagger from gag to gag, none of which are particularly well pulled-off . Every line seems to be aiming for something, meaning that little of the dialogue is interesting in its own right. Thus the whole film feel like a checklist of ’80s clichés and character tropes, whilst Linklater’s past successes have all been as aimless and fluid as they are plotless. At the end of the day, you should probably watch Dazed and Confused instead.

Further rule violations mar first day of voting in NUS referendum

0

The first day of voting in Oxford’s NUS referendum was made more dramatic by instances of rule violations on both sides.

This morning the NUS issued an email to all NUSExtra card holders detailing the risks leaving the national union would have for those with cards. However, while NUS did not know of the rule, the email list was prohibited as the OUSU Returning Officer had ruled, “all NUS mailing lists are classified as excluded mailing lists and therefore cannot be used for campaigning during this referendum”.

Around the same time, Louis McEvoy a campaigner in support of the movement to leave the NUS posted in the Christ Church JCR Facebook group a post urging students to vote to leave the NUS, “Don’t forget to vote in the NUS referendum today (unless you want to stay in. In which case, feel free to forget)”. Posting of this form also breaks OUSU rules concerning campaigning in closed groups.

The NUS commented to Cherwell that “An email was sent to NUS Extra card holders who signed up to receive further communication from NUS. We feel we have a duty to inform card holders that they will no longer be able to access this service should students vote for their union to disaffiliate from NUS”.

Indeed, the returning officer, Anna Mowbray, claimed she did not have any reason to believe the email was sent at the direction of the Yes campaign, but did note that, while some were unsure a non-University affiliated group could break election rules, this did constitute a rule violation.

“According to the regulations, the official campaigns are responsible for the conduct of anyone who campaigns on their behalf”, Mowbray said. “Consequently, although the NUS are not part of Oxford University, sending out information that promotes the Yes2NUS campaign is part of Yes2NUS Campaigning. Therefore it does come under the remit of the election regulations.”

The Yes campaign was also unaware of the email before it was sent. “This situation has arisen from miscommunication, rather than any intention to break rules. We in the Yes to NUS campaign did not know that NUS were planning on using their NUS Extra email list to remind students about our referendum. Similarly, NUS officers did not know at all about the ruling. Had we known it was something NUS were planning on doing, we would have told them about the ruling”, a Yes campaign spokesman said.

This ruling by the returning officer is also why Louis McEvoy’s post broke the rules, for though McEvoy is a private individual unaffiliated with the official campaign, the No campaign is responsible for his actions.

“Louis’ rule break was unfortunate but an innocent mistake – he isn’t officially involved with No Thanks NUS and wasn’t aware of the rules. As soon as we were informed of the post on the ChCh page we contacted him to get him to remove it and the matter was dealt with quickly and efficiently,” leader of No Thanks NUS Anne Cremin said.

Though, the No side took a less forgiving tone with the NUS’s email violation. “We are disappointed by what appears to be a flagrant violation of the rules by the NUS. The NUS has demonstrated that it has no respect for the democratic rules of our student union” Cremin said.

While McEvoy’s post is being dealt with internally, OUSU is trying to “find a suitable recompense for this email which clearly limits the fairness of the referendum by allowing one side a channel of communication that is not available to the other”, Mowbray said.

This all follows an email from New College’s access rep in support of the Yes campaign, violating the same rules as the NUS.

Preview: A Streetcar Named Desire

A triumphant jazz ensemble plays us into the opening of Blank Canvas Productions’ production of A Streetcar Named Desire. Watching the first scene unfold it is evident that even without the promised spectacle of lights, costume, and set, Harry Lukakis and Anna Seccombe have managed to craft an elegant allusion of mid-century New Orleans. This is helped by an ensemble of well-crafted performances that aid in highlighting the naturalism of Williams’ text.

But of course, Tennessee Williams’ evocative work is not a straightforward piece of theatrical realism. “Our emphasis is in highlighting the elements of classical theatre,” says co-director Harry Lukakis. “We aim to showcase the ways in which the past, present, and future confront each other in Williams’ work.” Co-director Anna Seccombe adds, “The lights, the set, the costumes… It’s all about seeing the intentional onstage.”

There is certainly little in the production to leave one wondering if a moment was improvised. Lukakis and Seccombe appear to have worked tirelessly with their cast in maintaining a consistent, realistic flow of action. Each beat and gesture feels simultaneously effortless and well rehearsed. One can see such feats of acting ability in particular in Maddy Walker and Jason Imlach, whose performances as Stella and Stanley Kowalski raise the bar for collegiate productions of Streetcar.

The play follows Southern debutante Blanche DuBouis (Mary Higgins) who is visiting her sister, Stella, and brother-in-law, Stanley, in New Orleans after taking a leave of absence from teaching in Mississippi. A cornerstone of American theatre, Williams’ Pulitzer Prize-winning work of theatre explores the dichotomy of class, sexuality, and mental illness under the umbrella of repressed Southern American society.

While this American raised the occasional eyebrow at a few messy vowels, the actors generally did an outstanding job of maintaining the New Orleans’ ‘yat’ accent and the more distinguishable Southern lilt in the characters of Stella and Blanche.

Certain to be a highlight of the Oxford theatre scene, A Streetcar Named Desire rounds out a great term with its respect for its powerful source material and courage to experiment beyond Williams’ words. This high-caliber production is not to be missed.

‘A Streetcar Named Desire’ will be running Thursday-Sunday of 6th Week at the Keble O’Reilly Theatre

Is there hope for pop music?

0

Inform – Educate – Entertain. This was the title of London-based archive-funk duo Public Service Broadcasting’s debut album, and it also serves as a kind of mission statement.

The band’s main gimmick is the use of archive clips and famous quotations to form the lyrical content of their pieces, along with live instruments to create a kind of anachronistic EDM/funk sound. It’s a listening experience best equated to listening to both Radio 4 and 6 Music, whilst simultaneously watching a history documentary. It’s the sort of thing which ought to suffer from the classic problem of being more interesting to read about than to listen to, but the band make it work through the sheer cleverness and skill of their compositions.

But these indie darlings also embody a number of recent trends in the pop scene, and shows where they might lead – as they put it themselves, they bring “the lessons of the past through the music of the future”. Public Service Broadcasting dispense with singers entirely, instead sampling their songs’ entire vocal content. Singers are by no means gone from the mainstream pop space, but producers are gaining serious ground as stars in their own right. Hell, even for traditional ‘pop stars’ the producer is increasingly visible and important – Justin Bieber’s recent comeback owed more to Skrillex than it did to Bieber himself. Vocals are becoming just one production aspect among many, and PSB present a pure expression of that sentiment. In the age of streaming and singles, album sales are at an all-time low. The Long Playing record is history. So why not take advantage of that? PSB are not exactly a pop act – number 21 on the album charts is the closest they’ve got – but they represent the best instincts of pop music as it stands today, and for that they deserve to stick to stick around.

A Beginner’s Guide to… Grace Potter and the Nocturnals

0

Grace chirps a sassy “Ooh La La” and squeals like an angel. She is a Vermont blonde, whose voice proves more and more versatile as I go through her band’s four studio albums and 12 year-long history of blues rock.

I have the soundtrack album of Burton’s Alice in Wonderland, Almost Alice to thank for Grace Potter and the Nocturnals. If the trio’s cover of Jefferson Airplane’s ‘White Rabbit’ featured on the album stays on the safe side of innovation, venturing only as far as the addition of a bass and eerie twangs on an acoustic guitar, it is certainly more successful than Pink’s unexciting adaptation for the film’s sequel.

Grace and her two current Nocturnals, Matt Burr and Benny Yurco, play the occasional alt-rock song like the live version of the originally bluesy ‘Nothing but the Water’. In this soulful festival tune livelier than the average Americana, the full power of the vocals rolls over the music’s simple composition while Grace skips barefoot from end to end of the stage.

This voice becomes the voice of a classic diva for the contemplative ‘Colors’ or the teasing modern blues of ‘Paris (Ooh La La)’, both taken from the band’s 2010 album. Alone in solo debut Midnight, however, Grace Potter falls into the trap of overly-synthesised, repetitive tunes with no more impact than a weak Lorde superimposed on a noughties dance soundtrack.

Grace is better off with her Nocturnals’ swinging bass and folk undertones, and chances are you’ll want to kick your boots off too and skip along to the easy-going indie rock.

10 songs you probably didn’t know were covers

0

1: ‘Torn’

An unmistakable one-hit-wonder for Natalie Imbruglia, the 1997 classic was a repurposing of a 1995 track by indie band Ednaswap, whose grungy guitar work did far less than the polished cover’s sunny chords and “ooh”s and “ah”s to unleash its credentials as a smash hit. Even if the cover is more infectious, the original still possesses a unique rawness and aggression which complement its yearning lyricism.

2: ‘Twist and Shout’

Yes, this undisputed classic of the Beatles’ oeuvre which we so loved in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off was in fact a cover. The Top Notes were an up-and-coming rock-and-roll band from New York who, guided by the then relatively unsuccessful Phil Spector, recorded this track… but to no avail. The consensus of the songwriters was that Spector butchered it, while the Beatles’ raucous rendition more accurately captured the song’s spirit.

3:‘The Ghost of Tom Joad’

Three mainline versions of this song actually exist: the first, by Bruce Springsteen featuring mournful harmonica and sparse accompaniment to his guitar and vocals; the second, by Rage Against the Machine, replacing Springsteen’s sorrow with white-hot anger. In tribute to this reimagining, Springsteen then re-recorded the song with Rage guitarist Tom Morello on lead guitar, and co-lead vocals. There is no definitive version – rather, there are three different conduits for the song’s John Steinbeck-inspired emotional devastation, based upon Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath.

4: ‘Everybody Needs Somebody to Love’

This groove-based blues number was, like ‘Twist and Shout’, partially a Bert Berns composition, written in collaboration with a lesser known soul artist named Solomon Burke. The Rolling Stones then brought the song into the limelight, covering it on the 1965 album The Rolling Stones, Now!, paving the way for its subsequent success on The Blues Brothers’ soundtrack in 1980.

5: ‘Mad World’

‘Mad World’ was, at one stage, unavoidable through adverts, films, and a constant place in the Top 40. It’s a testament to Gary Jules’ interpretation of Tears for Fears’ 80s original, which maintained a quiet, subdued intelligence. In fact, the original’s synth-pop nature harms the song, with a strange incongruity between the lyrics and the audio. It’s tough to say, but the cover is far superior.

6: ‘Hey Joe’

This is a disputed one – many different people claim authorship, so much so that it is, to all intents and purposes, classed as ‘Traditional’. However, L.A. garage rock band The Leaves were the first to commercially record the song, giving them (debatable) first dibs in a rough-at-the-edges gritty rock single. But there is no denying that this is a song that Hendrix truly claimed as his own, blending Jaggeresque gravel with Beatlesy harmonies and in turn with his own classic guitar pyrotechnics.

7: ‘Sea of Love’

Whereas the Phil Phillips original was a quite classic blues-rocker, Cat Power on her Covers Record embraced the fragility of the subject matter, to lay bare her voice and guitar to create a breath-taking love song. Moving every time.

8: ‘Make You Feel My Love’

To contemporary listeners of the 19 album, this song must have seemed entirely Adele’s; perfectly suited in its hushed ambience to her huskily passionate vocals. However, this is one of many in Dylan’s oeuvre to be made famous by others. Dylan’s own version is subdued and his voice akin to an old-smoker’s growl; and upon closer inspection, draws out the similarities between Dylan and Adele rather than the differences.

9: ‘The Man Who Sold The World’

This one is generational: for many sprogs of the 80s, Nirvana’s classic 1993 performance of this song back when MTV ruled the world will forever be the defining version. Yet the song in fact stems from the genius of the late David Bowie, who’s third album bears both this song, and its name as its album title. Good luck picking a favourite.

10: ‘Bittersweet Symphony’

Lol, what a joke. Fuck you Allen Klein. This isn’t by the Stones, and you know it. Long live The Verve. This is their moment of glory, and what an absolutely fantastic tune it is.

Accidental rule violation clouds debate on eve of NUS referendum

1

The New College access officer inadvertently violated OUSU referendum rules earlier this week by emailing out her support for the ‘Yes to NUS’ campaign using the JCR mailing list.

OUSU referendum rules stipulate that mailing lists “created or used by…a college (including a common room or college society)” should not be used for campaigning activity.

Without knowledge of this rule, Jodi Haigh, the Access, Minorities and Equal Opportunities Officer for New College JCR, sent an email to the JCR mailing list detailing the University-wide Access Programme Target Schools’ belief that disaffiliation would hurt access.

Both campaigns brought the issue to OUSU returning officer Anna Mowbray, and it was decided a further email detailing the arguments of No Thanks, NUS would fix the issue.

“All concerned felt the issue was resolved”, Mowbray said.

Indeed, the Yes side of the referendum distanced itself from the violation and wanted to move on with the campaign. “While it’s clear that staying in the NUS is the best choice for access, this was unfortunately against the regulations. The access rep in question was not on our campaign list, and likely not familiar with OUSU rules.” a Yes campaign spokesman said.

On the other hand, the No campaign was worried about rule violations. “We were made aware of the breach of the rules quite quickly as we have a number of supporters at New College and were disappointed to learn about it. We would urge the Yes side to respect the rules, particularly in light of concerns raised at other referenda in other SUs”, a spokesman for the campaign said.

Preview: No Exit

0

Having found success in Michaelmas with another play about guilty people sitting in a room, director Zoë Firth seems well-placed to take on No Exit, an intense one-act drama about three strangers trapped together in Hell. This minimalistic, fast-paced production is a far cry from the ensemble cast and lush period setting of And Then There Were None, so I was intrigued to see how she and her team would approach the unique challenges that entails.

In the absence of the fire and brimstone they expected of eternal damnation, Inèz, Estelle and Garcin slowly discover that they are to be each other’s torturers – as such, they must be both immensely cruel and still recognisably human. “At the end of the day, they’re three quite ordinary people, and seeing ordinary people do awful things is so interesting, because it shows that these people go to Hell not because they’re extraordinary in some way,” Firth explained. “They’re actually quite normal, and that’s all the more chilling.”

The actors, for their part, proved more than capable of the intensity the play demands. In particular, Jessie See dominated the scene as Inèz, by turns seductive, solicitous and predatory as she hovered over Estelle (Lydie Sheehan). While the two women have excellent chemistry, Nils Reimer as Garcin was perhaps at his strongest when he was apart from the others, obsessing over his legacy among the living. To all three’s credit, the characters’ reactions to each other were just as impressive as the emotional monologues and quick-fire interrogations. When Garcin finally admitted the crimes that brought him to Hell, Estelle couldn’t bear to look at him, while Inèz couldn’t bring herself to look away – nor, I suspect, will the audience.

By staging the production in the round, Firth intends to capitalise on the intimacy of the BT and draw onlookers into the action. The door through which we enter the theatre will also serve as the locked door in the text, and the recurring theme of surveillance weighs all the more heavily when there are spectators on all sides to pass judgment (“Everybody’s watching,” Inèz taunts at one point, and Garcin is later tormented by the idea of “all those eyes intent on me). When the characters look back at what’s happening on Earth in their absence, they do so by peering into the crowd. Everyone in the room has a role to play in the revelation that “Hell is other people.”

The excerpt I saw was entertaining and affecting in equal measure, and I’m confident that the rest of the show will be just as compelling. Between its innovative staging and electric cast, No Exit seems set to be a powerful and thought-provoking night of theatre you won’t want to miss.