Saturday 11th April 2026
Blog Page 1098

A Peek at Pistol Shooting

In the run-up to Pistol Shooting Cuppers, the Cherwell decided to see what this sport is all about. The Cuppers are hosted by the Oxford University Pistol Club (OUPC) and are taking place in 3rd week. They are open to all levels of experience. The preliminary round is set for Thursday from 18:30 to 20:30 and the finals are to take place on Sunday from 10:30 to 13:30.

David Robinson, a member of the Team England National Squad and a holder of an Extraordinary Blue Status for Pistol Shooting (which is usually a half-Blue sport), has kindly provided the Cherwell with a taster session. The OUPC trains at the Cricket Schools, which are located at the Iffley Road Sports Center. The Cricket Schools are the building located next to the grandstand on the running track – if ever in doubt, the Iffley reception desk gives great directions.

Robinson told, Cherwell, “pistol shooting is a target sport that requires dexterity, a stable platform and a low resting heart rate in order to perform well. In essence you fire projectiles down range at a stationary target, at varying distances, at varying speeds, with a variety of firearms, depending on the course of fire. The aim is to hit the middle of the target precisely and accurately, shot after shot. Sounds easy right? But unfortunately it is not. It requires calm and patience to repeat the shot process time and time again.”

After a rundown of the safety rules and the anatomy of the air-pistol along with quick instructions on how to load one, Robinson let me have a go with a cartridge pistol, which contains 5 shots. Right away, I got a glimpse of what Robinson was getting at in his ‘pistol-shooting in a nutshell.’ As I tried to narrow down on the target, my hand was quivering – breathing properly and the correct stance helped remedy the situation. The air pistol that I used weighed approximately 1 kilogram, and my arm was not used to holding something while stretched straight right out in front of me. Once, in the correct position with my hand on my waist and feet shoulder width apart, I mimicked Robinson’s movements, with a deep breath in I raised the pistol. On the exhale, I tried my best to take aim by lowering the pistol and focusing on the front sight. Unsurprisingly I missed the target completely. A common mistake for a total beginner, like me, is to not keep the wrist stable when pulling the trigger and a desire to aim for the middle of the target; instead one needs to point at the base of the black circle on the target ring.

Robinson also told Cherwell that a common mistake for a novice is: “assuming a pistol with almost no recoil is like a .44 Magnum from an action film. By anticipating recoil, the shot path is likely to be off centre and probably not on the target at all.”

With a few more tips from Robinson, I managed to hit two of my shots within the 9-ring. In all the sport is very safe as long as all protocol is followed. The pistols must always be pointed down the range, and the club instructs anyone interested in the proper ways of safe handling of firearms. Having given the sport a go for about an hour, it is very easy to comprehend, but it is more complex than it looks. There are many minute details that one must keep in mind. Robinson put it well saying that it is easy to pick up and hard to master. He sees pistol shooting as meditation, and in a way it was a very calming experience. From the moment one raises the pistol to the moment when one follows-through the shot, it is just you and the target.

The air pistol shooting experience was completely novel and unique, but the club has so much more to offer. The club has a range of firearms in their armory. Due to safety regulations only air-pistols can be shot in the Cricket Schools. The club uses standard Olympic air pistols, black powder muzzle loaded revolvers, gallery rifles (similar to the leaver action rifles seen in Western movies) and lightweight sport rifles. With a vast alumni network, the club is always open to cultivating their members’ interests. In addition to this, members compete in all the disciplines listed and get to do so at ranges outside of Oxford the main one used is the National Rifle Association range in Bisley, Surrey. There are many opportunities to put one’s skills to the test. Members compete in county, national and postal competitions. There are also additional matches such as the past vs. present members, a town vs. gown, and of course the varsity matches, of which there are two.

The Smallbore Varsity took place in early March with Oxford taking a tight victory with a score of 2166 to 2157. The Smallbore Varsity match uses air pistols, such as the one that I got to try. The competition consists of 4 rounds of 5 rapid-fire shots, where the competitor has 10 seconds to aim and shoot their round, and of 20 precision shots also taken in 4 rounds with 20 seconds per round. The Fullbore Varsity involves gallery and lightweight rifles and has a long-standing tradition. The first Fullbore Varsity match took place in 1908. The Fullbore Varsity match is coming up in July and will take part during the historic Imperial Meeting in Bisley. The squad is just commencing training for this fixture.

What sets OUPC apart from other shooting clubs, such as clay pigeon or rifle, here at Oxford is the range of firearms that one can try out as a member and a chance to compete in a diverse range of disciplines and competitions. The club also offers annual trips to Switzerland to give members a chance to shoot real pistols and semi-autos. Robinson mentioned that the three clubs have a very strong relationship and many OUPC members give the other clubs a try as well based on their skillset. At the end of the day, the main difference is the type of target that you want to hit and the type of firearms that you want to shoot with.

As I have learned through my taster session, OUPC is a very welcoming club and encourages anyone interested to try it out. It truly is a unique experience – in comparison to other sports that I have done in the past, this one really forces you to be mentally tough and to have impeccable concentration skills. It was a great break in the day, because for the few seconds that I took for each shot, I had a chance to completely clear my mind. The club is all-inclusive with a very strong women’s varsity club and actively promotes safe recreational gun usage. If you are at all interested in giving OUPC, do check out their website or shoot an e-mail to the captain Kahhong Tai ([email protected]).

 

The Best Cocktail Bars in Oxford

  1. The Varsity Club

Set over 4 floors including a rooftop bar with stunning views, The Varsity Club runs away with the prize for the most attractive cocktail bar. Chic and cool with cocktails served from midday to midnight, this is the place to be. The drinks are original, ranging from a “Maple”, (maple, peppercorn and clove syrup, honey tequila and bitters sprayed leaf) to an equally complex “Habenero” (chilli and vanilla vodka, pink pigeon rum, lime Juice, vanilla sugar, orange juice and bitters).

Offers: Two for £9; Monday to Friday midday-7pm, all day Sunday.

Strangest cocktail: “Beetroot”; beet shrub, tomato juice, vodka, aperol, worcester, tobasco and horseradish.

2. The Duke of Cambridge

The hub of Little Clarendon Street, the Duke of Cambridge’s popularity pays testament to its quality. The pub-like exterior is deceptive; inside, it’s decorated with fairy lights entwined in branches and low tables create booths down the length of the room. Cheaper than the Varsity Club – with arguably just as good a cocktail menu – you can’t go far wrong with this classic.

Offers: happy hour, 5-9pm Sunday-Thursday, 5-7:30pm Friday-Saturday, all hours Sunday-Thursday with an Oxford Union Card.

Best named cocktail: “Big Mac”; Jim Beam bourbon and berry liqueur with lime, raspberry and cranberry juice.

3. Raoul’s

Down the road from the Duke of Cambridge, the interior of Raoul’s is not overwhelming but the drinks speak for themselves. Raoul’s will present you with the biggest cocktail menu you’ve ever seen; they claim to use more fruit than any other bar in Oxford. This is where you’ll find the cocktails of the very best quality.

Offers: 30 per cent off; 4-8pm with anOxford Union card.

Best dessert-turned-cocktail: “Banoffee Pieface”; banana blended with vanilla sugar, lime, toffee sauce and rum.

4. Angels

Angels is the smallest bar on the list and bursts with character. It leaves you with an overwhelming impression of pink – the walls, the lighting, even the seats are a deep cosy pink. While not necessarily the classiest bar in Oxford, it’s definitely dependable and always busy. The drinks menu is almost as long as Raoul’s and the cocktails are almost as inventive as The Varsity Club. Almost.

Offers: “Heavenly Hour”; 4.30-9pm every day.

Best twist on a classic: “Passion Fruit Martini”; vodka, passion fruit and passion fruit purée shaken (not stirred) with vanilla syrup.

5. Freud

Near the bottom of Walton Street, Freud majestically stands out as the most unusual cocktail bar in Oxford. Set inside an old church, huge pillars mark the outside in an acro- politan fashion and inside high ceilings and stained glass make your evening un- forgettable. Cocktails are good value and they also offer a mean food menu – think mediterranean platters and feta pizzas.

Offers: few and far between

Strongest cocktail: “Homeboy”; white rum, apricot brandy, triple sec, orange and pineapple.

Athlete of the Week: William Szymanski

0

Cherwell: Let us start with a little bit about yourself: American football isn’t overwhelmingly popular in the United Kingdom. How did you become interested in the sport?  

Will: I first became interested because my older brother started playing the Madden video game, and I wanted to join in as well.  I used to be so nice at that game that I think I went a few years without taking an L. Then, after my GCSEs, my family relocated to America and I got to play 2 years of high school football, which was great fun.

C: What are you currently studying, at what college?

W: I’m doing Classics at Brasenose.

C: How are you enjoying American Football so far? Was it easy to get the hang of the sport?

W: I love it, I don’t think there is a more fun sport to play in an organised capacity.  You can go to a park and play soccer whenever, or go to a gym and run some pickup basketball, but playing 11 on 11 tackle football is an opportunity you don’t get that often.  Although I was pretty experienced coming in, it definitely took me a while to get used to playing quarterback, since I’d never done that before uni.  My first year I wasn’t very good at all – I think I threw about 3 or 4 touchdowns for the whole 7 game season.  Now the game feels a lot slower and I feel a lot more in control.

C: Have you played rugby (league or union) in the past? Would you say the skills were transferable?

W: As a kid I played a lot of rugby union, at school and for a club, but it’s been so long now I’m always pretty terrible when I try to play for college.  The games are similar, and if you’re big and fast and strong you’ll probably be good at both, but there are a lot of skills, like throwing a ball forwards, that are unique to either sport.  A lot of rookies take a while to get used to the pace of the game and the different techniques in football, and it’s pretty cool for an older player like me to watch their growth over the year.

C: For our readers who aren’t familiar with American football, could you tell us a favourite play or skill you think our readers would like to know?

W: I always like to throw deep; that’s the playground play where you just tell your receivers to go long and you throw it as far as you can.  We call our “four verticals” play Mississippi, after an old NFL quarterback called Brett Favre who was from Mississippi and could throw the ball a mile, and I’m always asking coach if we can run that play.  Unfortunately I can’t divulge too much else from the playbook!

C: The Varsity Bowl is coming up soon; could you give us an exclusive preview on the match?

W: This year we’re hosting it, it should be a great day down at Tilsely Park.  Since BUCS realigned the divisions at the end of last year we didn’t play Cambridge in the regular season, which is why we’re playing so late in the year.  They’ve beaten us the last 3 years and it’s normally a close game, but we feel really good this year – we went 8-1, averaged about 30 points a game on offense, and only conceded about 6 on defense.  We also haven’t lost a home game since early 2014 (our last two varsities were away, due to some odd scheduling).  Cambridge are always tough and rivalry games are always unpredictable, but we’re confident in ourselves.

C: Do you follow any NFL teams, or is there a particular player you idolize? If so, how does that affect the way you play?

W: I live in Ann Arbor, Michigan, home of the University of Michigan, so I love my Wolverines.  College football is a big deal in the US, and we have one of the best traditions in the country – the biggest stadium in America, and the most wins of all time.  In terms of the NFL, there’s a Michigan alumnus who plays for New England called Tom Brady, and I’m a reasonably big fan of his.  I chose to wear #12 because of him, and I don’t like my footballs to be too overinflated, but I wouldn’t say I try to emulate his style of play – that’d be blasphemy.  A more realistic goal for me would be to be the right-handed Tim Tebow.

C: What is a basic day of training for you? How do you make sure you are the most prepared you can be for your games?

W: We normally start practice with a classroom session – going through new plays, scouting the other team, watching game film and things like that.  Then after we warm up, we go through special teams (kickoff, kick return etc.) plays, individual position drills, and some group work (i.e. passing drills with wide receivers and defensive backs) before we scrimmage at the end.  My coach will tell you that I don’t watch enough film, but I try to know in advance what the opposing defense likes to do, so we can counter that with plays that we like.  For example, we like to know who their worst pass defenders are, so we can exploit that matchup, and in what situations they like to do certain things.  There’s a lot of work that goes into scouting the other team.

C: How do you work on designing plays with your WRs/TEs/RBs? What are some difficulties with that? Any memorable successes?

W: We have a playbook that we’ve used for a few years now with our basic formations and plays, but obviously we’re adaptable as well.  If a receiver tells me he likes a certain route against a certain defender, almost always I’ll tell him to do it and we’ll look to take advantage of it.  We have some really smart guys, as you might expect, so normally they’re onto something.  Once we noticed that a deep defender kept coming up to defend our running back, who is really good, when he ran a passing route out of the backfield, so we told another guy to run where that defender started from on the next play, and it was an easy touchdown.  Less successfully, one of my receivers once told me he could get open by running up the field and cutting inwards, so I told him to do it, but I’d forgotten that a different receiver on the other side was doing the exact same thing, so they actually ran straight into each other.  He still caught the ball though

C: Could you tell us a little bit about the team dynamic?

W: I don’t think anyone has ever come to our team and not had a great time.  A great man called Chris Wallace once said that he didn’t want to play football because “hearing a coach scream aint my lifetime dream” but we have great coaches and a great group of guys.  Pub crawls have been known to get messy.

C: Any advice for anyone that wants to give American Football a try?

W: Find us on facebook and come down to practice! We never stop recruiting new players.

Athlete of the Week: Anne Kelly

Cherwell: Thank you so much for letting the Cherwell interview you. Let us start with a little bit about yourself. Helen has mentioned that you’re originally from Canada. How have you enjoyed your transition to the UK?

Anne: It required some adjustment at first but I finally feel as if I’ve settled in here. Given that I’m in my fourth year at Oxford now, I feel as if I’ve learned to wield an umbrella much better now than I did before — and a cricket bat as well, perhaps!

C: What are you currently studying?

A: I’m currently in the third year of a DPhil in Medieval Literature. My area of specialty is Older Scots Literature, so basically that means that I study texts written in Scots (a dialect originally derived from English spoken in the north of England) and covering the late fourteenth century through to the first quarter of the sixteenth.

C: Cricket’s not too common in North America. How are you enjoying it so far? Were the rules easy to pick-up or are there some that you find peculiar?

A: It’s really not very common at all! That being said, there are more teams than one would expect as a result of Canada’s big immigrant population. In fact, my uncle was from Trinidad and bowled in a team which played in downtown Toronto. Although he died of cancer a few years ago, I’m sure he’d be delighted to know that I’ve picked up the sport and that I absolutely love it. I did not find the rules so strange, although the first match I played I dropped my bat after I hit it, forgetting that I needed to run with it. I also had a hard time picking up some of the terms of the sport, describing ‘overs’ as ‘thingies’ — to great hilarity within the team.   

C: As someone who has previously played softball, would you say the skills were transferable?

A: Some are and some aren’t. Fielding has been an easy enough transition. There is nothing like bowling at all in softball, so that took some time to learn. Aspects of batting have crossed over whereas others have not. There isn’t really a defensive stroke in softball, so learning not to try and swing at everything has also been a challenge. I always welcome the opportunity for a cross-batted shot, though, since that is much more like what I’m used to.

C:  For our readers who aren’t familiar with softball, could you give us a quick “softball in a nutshell”?

A: Softball is like baseball in its resemblance to ’rounders,’ a sport which is not played in North America. There are some big differences between softball and baseball, primarily that the ball is bigger in softball, the diamond is smaller, and the pitcher doesn’t throw overhand but with a windmill motion. One important thing to note: the ball in softball is not soft at all! In fact, it’s just as hard as a cricket ball.

C: The cricket varsity is coming up soon, how’s the team looking? Are you guys ready to shoe some tabs?

A: The team is very strong this year. Although we lost some good players at the end of last season, we’ve also gained some as well. We fully intend to shoe the tabs but we won’t take Cambridge for granted, of course.

C: On the topic of the team, what is the dynamic like?

A: The team dynamic is great. We have a very diverse squad of girls as a result of encouraging anybody who would like to learn the sport to come out to training. This has presented a great opportunity to learn from each other and assist in each other’s development. Although we take the sport very seriously, there is also a lot of joking around, which is really the ideal atmosphere in which to practice and to play.

C: Any advice for anyone that wants to give cricket a shot?

A: You absolutely should! Joining OUWCC has probably been one of the best decisions which I made in my time here at Oxford. It has introduced me to a new sport but, more importantly, to a great group of girls and coaches as well. We would love to have you!

Local teenager in critical condition after being stabbed on Cowley

0

An Oxford teenager is in critical condition after being stabbed in Cowley this afternoon.

The victim was taken from James Street, where the incident occurred, to John Radcliffe Hospital and is being treated for life-threatening injuries.

The Oxford Mail is reporting that shop owners saw a body lying in the road before an ambulance came and police blocked off the area.

The suspected assailants were seen escaping through the backyard of St Hilda’s second-years Emma Whyte and Nadia Campbell-Brunton, who live on currently-closed Regents Street. Whyte, describing the incident, told Cherwell, “My friend spotted a man burst into our garden through the fence at the back so she came out running up to my room which is on the top floor. We then saw two men run across the garden into the next ones followed by one policeman”.

She went on to describe how her neighbour ran onto Denmark Street and, she believes, ran into one of the suspected assailants and slowed him down. The same neighbour saw the other man “nonchalantly walking” down Regents Street toward a parking lot on Hurst Street and told the police. Whyte was unsure if either was apprehended by the police.

Whyte described the first man as white and possibly wearing a blue jumper and the second as a black man.

Police have arrested two men in connection with the stabbing, although it is as yet unclear whether the two arrested are the same men who the Hilda’s students saw being chased by Police.

It is understood one man was arrested in Iffley Road and a second man arrested in nearby Hurst Street.

Reflections from a (nearly) non-fresher

I remember when I first arrived in Oxford as a new fresher. I was uncertain and nervous. In all honesty, I was actually downright petrified. The sheer magnificence of the place, with its old buildings, stained-glass windows and big patches of grass in the middle of the ‘quad’ that no-one was allowed to walk on was the stuff of fantasy films. It was a big change from the concrete jungle I came from in south-east London, and I was completely out of my comfort zone.

The pressure piled up when, on day two of my arrival, I was handed my first essay: ‘Do historians and sociologists ask fundamentally different questions?’. My first thoughts were why I had to write about sociologists when I had come to read History, and why I had to answer this question in the first place – this wasn’t what I envisioned I would be doing in my History degree. To add fuel to the flame, I was given my second essay on day three – and it was due in a week. Oxford seemed like too much to handle.

Freshers’ week was a blur. The constant introductions, the names, the subjects, the places and the desperation to win friends all wore me out. Week one and I was already feeling tired and out of place.

Despite suffering a major case of imposter syndrome in first week, subsequent weeks were not too bad. My tutors were great; the tutorial system is absolutely amazing. I learnt more in eight weeks about life, people and History than I did in my seven years at secondary school.

Saying that, the traditions of Oxford still baffle me, even after three terms here. Latin Prayers in hall that hardly anyone understands, dressing in full sub-fusc to be matriculated in a Latin ceremony, college balls, collections – I think even Cambridge call them exams! These traditions are incredibly bizarre, and quite unique to Oxford. On top of this, the conversations: talking politics at the dinner table is perfectly fine. Essay crisis? A weekly phenomenon. And the most exciting things in Trinity term? Punting and croquet. The Oxford bubble is real.

It’s Trinity term now, and the year has flown by. Oxford’s ‘strange’ traditions are seemingly normal now, and when I return home at the end of every term to normalcy, I must admit, I do sometimes miss Oxford. In spite of the weird and wonderful traditions, consistent deadlines, and eccentric tutors, Oxford is now a home away from home. Three terms later… I think I am really starting to like it here.

Unheard Oxford: Will Barker, assistant manager at the Duke of Cambridge

What makes The Duke of Cambridge unique? The owners, management and staff . There are a lot of cocktail bars springing up now, especially in Oxford, but The Duke of Cambridge has been going for 30 years, we have established systems in place and every member of staff is massively passionate about what they do. This is not a stop-gap job for anybody.

Friday and Saturday nights are not when we see the body of our student clientele; we see them Sunday to Thursday, Thursday usually being the main offender. How many do we see? It varies wildly. If we’re at the end of term-time and exams have been done: hundreds. If we’re running a private party for the Oxford Women in Business: again, hundreds. On an odd, quiet Monday night, maybe two or three trying to impress a date.

By and large, students are here for the happy hour content. It’s a perception thing, more than anything else: while they might be happy to spend loads of money on a bottle of wine and a meal, the moment you introduce the word ‘cocktail’ they’re looking for the cheap one. The exception which routinely comes up is an Espresso Martini, which seems to have got out among the student community as the only thing to drink after 11 pm. That’s fine, but it’s expensive.

At the Duke, we rarely have to kick people out. I’ve worked in a number of bars around Oxford, and in my first job strong-arming people out of the door was pretty much a nightly occurrence. The Duke is a little bit rare among late-night bars in that we don’t have any security at all: we don’t employ door-staff, and never have, so we rely on ourselves to keep a happy atmosphere in the bar.

Customers do occasionally rack up huge bills behind the bar. We employ part-time staff, many of whom are students, and sometimes they’ll spend more than they should, and it gets taken out of their paycheck. By and large, however, the main offenders for massive bills are birthday parties. People come in, and they go “I’d like to leave a card behind the bar.”

And the first thing you do is say, “How much would you like the limit to be?” Then there’s this moment of absolute fear when they go, “Oh no, don’t worry about it.” And I say, “I think you’re going to regret that”, but before long two of their friends are sitting at the bar slamming Martinis for four hours.

Seven Oxford fellows elected to Royal Society

0

In the scientific community, the Royal Society is the mark of distinction, being appointed a fellow means joining a club that includes the Isaac Newtons, the Charles Darwins and the Albert Einsteins of the world. Earlier this week, seven Oxford academics were added to those ranks.

The incoming class included mathematicians Martin Bridson and Marcus du Sautoy, chemist Bill David, physicist Artur Ekert, pharmacologist Antony Galione, geneticist Gil McVean and Astronomer and Astrophysicist Steven Balbus.

All of these academics have led their fields for years, conducting pioneering research in everything from calcium signalling to geometric group theory. Professor Steven Balbus of New College has previously won the Shaw Prize, widely considered the Nobel Prize of the East, for his work with disks of material surrounding a star or other body, while Professor Bridson has won the Whitehead Prize for his work with geometry.

“For a scientist, it is especially gratifying to know that one’s work is held in high esteem by one’s colleagues”, Professor Balbus told Cherwell. “ I also recognise that this is not solely about personal kudos. Election to the Royal Society carries with it some responsibility both to advise and to work as an advocate for science at a time when research funds are not plentiful.”

Professor McVean currently works with the human genome, attempting to document thousands of genomes to understand differences in human, but is most famous for bringing mathematics to the study of genetics. His scholarship has also made it significantly easier for scientists to study very diverse species and genomic sequences. Also involving maths, Professor du Sautoy has brought the ideas number theory to the study symmetry while running a BBC show called The Story of Maths, which hopes to increase the public awareness of maths.

In chemistry, Professor David has helped develop of neutron and X-Ray powder disaffiliation, a phenomenon he discovered. He currently focuses on the creation of batteries, including those that use ammonia as an energy vector, but has worked with lithium-ion batteries as well as hydrogen-based storage . His work has earned him awards over the last several decades, including the inaugural British Crystallography Association Prize and the European Society for Applied Physical Chemistry Prize.

As a sign of the future of computational science, Professor Ekert works in quantum-computing, which he has pioneered and furthered for years. His initial discovery was the usage of quantum entanglement, a phenomenon by which two particles are linked and perform the same motions no matter how far apart they are, to send information, allowing for miniscule and incredibly fast computing. For many, quantum computing represents the future of computers. Indeed, the Royal Society says he “has played a leading role in transforming quantum information science into a vibrant interdisciplinary field”.

Finally, pharmacologist Antony Galione has elucidated the effects calcium may have in the normal functioning of cells, discovering new pathways through which it connects cells and internal organelles. Indeed his work has helped discover the ways calcium channels affect Ebola infection, fertilisation, embryo development and cardiac contractility.

Oxford academics were the single largest share of the 50 new fellows, beating Cambridge and Aberdeen, which had five and three, respectively. New College was especially well represented in this selection, having three of its Fellows win the prize.

This year continues a series of good years for Oxford academics joining the Royal Society, with eight being initiated last year, as well.

Labour Club to debate women empowerment

0

Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) will tomorrow evening debate a motion on empowering women in the Club. The motion notes the lack of gender equality both in OULC committee positions and general attendance to club meetings. If it were passed, OULC would split the role of President into a Chair and a Deputy Chair, one of which would be held by a woman at all times.

The motion would introduce a quota of two women for committee positions. If no one who “self identifies partly or wholly as a woman or transfeminine” stood, a report would have to be produced and actions taken to increase participation amongst women.

“Overt anti-semitism [is] rife amongst certain elements at Oxford University”.

John Mann on Twitter

The motion comes at a time of increased scrutiny of both OULC and the Labour Party more generally. Before any motions are debated, John Mann MP, Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Antisemitism, will address the club.

Earlier this year, Mann called for a full enquiry and suspension of OULC for allegations of racism, following the resignation of Club co-Chair Alex Chalmers in Hilary. Chalmers resigned claiming a large proportion of members “have some kind of problem with Jews”. As a result, OULC is currently under investigation by the Labour Party’s student national organisation.

The Independent
The Independent

Anti-Semitism will also be on the agenda during the General Meeting which follows Mann’s talk. After members have debated the motion on empowering women in OULC, a motion to condemn the “anti-Semitic remarks” made by NUS President Malia Bouattia and to call on her to resign will be discussed.

The motion further criticises the undemocratic nature of the NUS and suggests that OULC resolves to call for reform of the NUS.

The motion, proposed by ex-OULC Treasurer Louis McEvoy, follows widespread discontent concerning allegations of anti-semitism in the NUS. These concerns, amongst others, have resulted in a referendum on Oxford’s affiliation to the NUS to be held in 6th week.

Britain should not give up on its collapsing steel industry

The steel industry must be nationalised if private buyers aren’t found for Tata’s UK plants. The government’s current plan to part nationalise (up to 25 per cent) and debt finance to assist potential buyers is a step in the right direction, but falls short of securing the future of steel in the UK.

If the Tata plants were allowed to close, 40,000 jobs would be lost, while around half the UK’s production capacity would vanish. Britain is only the 18th largest steel producing country, but companies in our high value manufacturing sector, such as the Mini factory in Cowley, rely heavily on high-quality British steel for their products.

Opponents of possible nationalisation point out that steel isn’t profitable in the UK today, but there is a much more nuanced reality. While China floods the global markets today, making European production unprofitable, it does so at a cost. Last month China’s Dongbei steel company defaulted on a $131m debt. If China is ‘dumping’ steel at a loss into our market it makes sense for the UK to wait out the storm by subsidising or nationalising our production until the unsustainable glut of Chinese steel returns closer to equilibrium pricing.

In a few years’ time UK steel could well be profitable again. If we don’t save the industry now it simply won’t be there to take advantage of future profits. Unlike our more flexible services industry, heavy industry like steel takes enormous investment and time to establish. While companies like Tata lack the resources to keep unprofitable plants running until market forces stabilise, the government has resources and the incentives to do exactly that.

Hundreds of billions of pounds were spent bailing out the banking sector during the credit crunch, whereas Tata bought its UK plants for a comparatively tiny £6.2 billion in 2007. While the steel industry may not be as fundamental to our economy as the banking sector, the cost of saving it is so comparatively small that it is at least as valid an investment.

Furthermore, people employed in the services sector tend to have less specific skill-sets and therefore they can retrain with relative ease. This is not the case for steel workers. Last summer I did work experience in a Polish iron foundry and became aware that the skills and knowledge required to run a foundry take a long time to build and are incredibly specialised. It would be a considerable waste of skills if workers trained to make top-grade steel were expected to retrain and find work in unrelated sectors. It goes without saying that in the meantime the communities in steel towns like Port Talbot would be devastated.

In Poland, as I entered into Rzeszów iron foundry, it was like falling into hell. The air is hot and the dust from the inoculants catches the back of your throat, blackening your mucus. Every minute inside feels like an hour stolen from your life expectancy. The furnaces and crucibles glow bright orange and sparks from magnesium alloying seem to burn holes in your retinas. The casting cleaners work for six hours a day with only a 15 minute break – they leave work with hands, faces and lungs black as coke dust.

But these workers are producing some of the most advanced cast iron products in the world. This small Polish town is producing cylinder blocks for every single GE train in India using a casting technique only ever developed in that foundry. Their hard and seemingly unfair graft has made Rzeszów a very wealthy and clean town and has helped the local universities to progress.

While heavy industry may not always bring in money, it does create skill, pride and power for normal people. More than we can say for our elitist and often destructive financial sector. There is no future in which Britain is better off without its steel industry, even if it remains unprofitable for some time. Unlike the coal industry, which could be replaced with North Sea gas, nuclear and renewable power, the steel industry is indispensable.

There is not yet an alternative material and so in economic terms the failure of the steel industry is not creative destruction, but plain destruction. I’m sure the thousands of workers in British steel feel the same.