Monday 13th April 2026
Blog Page 1115

Delving into Dickens: A literary love affair

1

A few weeks ago, I made the mistake of telling my girlfriend that I’d never seen either of the Bridget Jones movies. She talked me into watching them despite the fact that I was happy curling up with my worn-out copy of Charles Dickens’ The Pickwick Papers. As I sat watching it, mentally ticking off the thinly veiled Pride and Prejudice references, it occurred to me that I recently lived through the plot of a romantic comedy myself. Not with my girlfriend, if that’s what you’re thinking, but with the author of the tattered paperback in my hands.

Much like the heroine of almost every ‘Rom-Com’ I’ve ever seen, I was introduced to the dashing stranger that is Charles Dickens. Except instead of being presented to my love interest by an overbearing mother or best friend at a cocktail party, it was in a classroom by an overbearing teacher who slammed a copy of Great Expectations on the desk in front of me and told me to “begin at chapter one”. It’s at this point in the movie that tall-dark-and-handsome usually makes an asinine comment that greatly offends and alienates the protagonist. This entire novel was that asinine comment; long, drawn-out, devoid of morals and with scarcely a likeable character, I simply couldn’t engage and vowed I would never being even an acquaintance with this man, let alone anything more serious.

It is generally established that the next few scenes involve the hero living their life, hanging out with friends and even a few dalliances with other minor love interests who usually turn out to be very, very bad for you. For me, living my life was my A-Levels. My friends were comfortable reads like Mark Haddon, Terry Pratchett and the sassy quips of Jane Austen, all of whom naturally offer the comic relief. My dalliance? An ill-fated affair with the roguish playboy that is Leo Tolstoy, which left me tired, exhausted and with a pounding headache. Dickens came up in conversations now and again, awkwardly brought up by friends in pubs and pushed by teachers and parents as the better match. It was relatively easy to turn my nose up and ignore his dark, shadowy presence at the back of my mind. Then came the literary equivalent of what I like to call ‘the unavoidable moment’. You know the one! Maybe it’s a party where the hero can’t avoid the love interest any longer, maybe his best friend’s starts dating the sister, maybe an office mishap means they have to work together. This is kind of what happened to me, except for me it came in the form of a university reading list. “You must have read at least three works by this author” it loudly boasted. As I looked at his smug expression, curly hair and row-upon-row of densely typed script, my heart sank a little and I tried to ignore the slight arousal of my interest.

During this stage, Bridget Jones starts to notice the more redeeming qualities of Mark Darcy instead of viewing him as a pompous arse. The same was happening for me and Charlie. Instead of the drab, dour and fundamentally elitist man who offered me Great Expectations, I met het intelligent, thoughtful author of A Tale of Two Cities, the cheeky, comedic journalist that penned Sketches by Boz and shrewd, perceptive and passionate social campaigner behind Bleak House. I was starting, it seemed, to see things from his point of view.

Every romantic comedy seems to end with a big reveal. When the past sins of tall-dark-and-handsome are explained away in a perfectly justified soliloquy. The protagonist curses themselves for being so judgemental. Finally, the two fall in love. I found my justification when reading a biography of Charles Dickens. It told me that when his stories were published in magazines, the guy was paid by the word. I’d objected to him on the grounds that he was long-winded, overly descriptive and a little boring, but I got it now! Of course he was going to ramble on for ages, it was earning him the money to buy his family food! It was admirable! Heck, if I was paid by the word, my novels would be twice the length even of Dombey and Sons! Suddenly, there was a brand new man stood before me! Suddenly, I understood him, respected him even. He was only trying to make a living. Finally, I could open up my heart to this intriguing author and let my love develop.

There’ll be a proposal of course, as long as it’s better than the dreadful, fumbling attempt of Mr Headstone in Our Mutual Friend. As for the sequel, well it’s obvious isn’t it? I’ll find out what he did to Nancy in Oliver Twist and angry and heartbroken I’ll end our relationship, subsequently struggling to forgive him before he wins me back with The Christmas Books. 

Oxford Muslim leaders condemn Lahore attacks

0

Muslim leaders in Oxford have condemned the suicide bombing that occurred in Pakistan on Sunday this week. 70 were killed and 300 injured at Lahore after a bomb was detonated at the city’s Gulshan-E-Iqbal park during Christian Easter celebrations.

It is thought that the majority of the victims of the attack were women and children, of which many were Muslims.

The founder of The Oxford Foundation Imam Monawar Hussain told Cherwell the attacks were “utterly senseless” and left him “deeply saddened.”

He added, “These were senseless and wicked attacks aimed at the Pakistani Christian community celebrating a significant religious holy day in the Christian calendar. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their families, friends and the people of Pakistan.

“As a father, it’s heart-breaking to witness the images of families and especially children playing, rejoicing and having fun, being cut down by such an horrific and callous act. As a Muslim, the Prophet’s words, ‘he who is not merciful to children is not one of us’ keep reverberating in my mind.”

A breakaway faction of the Taliban militant group, Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, which once declared allegiance to IS, claimed responsibility for Sunday’s attack.

Director of Cowley’s Oxford Islamic Centre Hojjat Ramzy said, “All Muslims condemn the killing of innocent people in Pakistan. We are praying for the families of the victims. Our heart goes to those who lost their loved ones.”

Since the attacks on Easter Sunday, Muslim communities worldwide have condemned the suicide bombing in Pakistan.

Oxford University Islamic Society told Cherwell, “The Oxford University Islamic Society would like to express its grief and shock at the heinous events of Lahore, and extend its heartfelt condolences and prayers to the people of Pakistan, and to all those around the world affected by terrorism. We note that the bombing, which targeted Christians and claimed predominantly Muslim lives, was an attack on Pakistani society, and we utterly reject this attempt to divide religious communities in Pakistan.

“We pray for unity on the values of peace, compassion and mercy, and demand for the venerable Christian community in Pakistan the unconditional tolerance, respect and protection that is specifically postulated by Islamic teachings. All peoples around the world are involved in a common struggle against violence, and we support wholeheartedly any group working for peace and an end to war.”

Fighting terror with perspective

0

In the last week, the so-called Islamic State has carried out two horrific attacks: one on a central shopping street in Istanbul, the other in the Brussels airport.

The former, which killed five people and wounded dozens more, took place just a few minutes from where I was staying at the time, and just a few meters from the church where I had been going to Mass. The whole area was immediately shaken, physically and metaphorically, and I felt fear all around – both in myself and in others. A café owner, Behzat, told me, “I’m very scared – Turkey used to be a safe place to live, but I don’t think that’s true anymore.” Terrorism also causes anger. A stall holder in the Grand Bazaar who asked not to be named told me, “[President] Erdogan has no idea, he doesn’t know where the bombs are – he says everything is safe and then the bombs go [off].”

Even worse than anger, this awful act has led to mistrust and division. An English teacher on the Asian side of Istanbul, who also asked not to be named, said he was thinking about moving home to South Carolina, but wasn’t sure he was safe there either. “I’m very worried,” he said, “especially because I take the metro a lot. You just can’t trust anyone anymore…anyone could be working with them.”

Fear, anger, and division are understandable reactions to terrorism. They’re natural. I feel them myself. But they’re also how the terrorists win. When Mehmet Ozturk walked down Istikal Avenue on March 19, mentally preparing to blow himself up, surely fear, anger, and most of all division were the reactions he was hoping for most. The best response to this type of terrorism is neither easy nor exciting: it is to simply ignore it.

This may sound absurd in the wake of ISIS’ repeated attacks across the globe, from Australia to California, Istanbul to Ottawa, and even more so in light of all the other terrorism that has claimed so many lives over the years. But when you look more closely at the figures, our collective fear of terrorism seems less reasonable. According to the New America Foundation, a think tank in Washington D.C., an average of three Americans have been killed by jihadist terrorism per year since 9/11.

Compare this to the fact that about thirty Americans die every day from regular gun violence, eighty-three from falls, and over a hundred from car accidents. An American is more than ten thousand times more likely to die from a fatal fall than from terrorism, and yet as Paul Waldman of the Washington Post points out, “we haven’t declared a ‘War on Falling’ and nobody tells pollsters their biggest fear is that they or someone in their family will suffer a fatal fall.” The figures are similar for the UK: according to a 2012 report compiled for Parliament by David Anderson, terrorism killed about the same number of people in the UK from 2000-2011 as bees. Over that same period, drowning in the bath was the cause of death for six times as many UK residents as terrorism, and cycling accidents were about twenty-four times more deadly than jihad. More troubling, when one considers the results of our dramatic emotional response to terrorism, about twenty times as many UK citizens were killed through combat in Afghanistan as died from terrorism against civilians.

When I left Istanbul for Riga, my family was understandably relieved. It is highly unlikely that there are any extremists plotting the overthrow of the evil Latvian empire. But in fact, being outside ISIS’ sphere of influence makes me hardly any safer at all. The real threats are in the five-way intersection down the street, the hamburger I had for lunch, and the bathtub waiting to welcome me with open, deadly arms when I finish writing this piece.

Terrorism is not an existential threat to our lives, culture, or civilization, unless we make it so. The real damage done by these attacks is not in the loss of life and limb, tragic as these deaths and injuries are, but in the reaction felt by hundreds of millions of people around the world; our collective intake of breath and double-locking of the door. In the face of terrorism we ought not declare war, restrict civil liberties, or cower in fear of the next attack – this is what the terrorists hope for, and the only way they can inflict true damage. Instead, we should treat terrorists like their equally deadly insect counterparts: a nuisance.

Of course, we should take commonsense precautions – if you have an allergy then beekeeping probably isn’t the career for you, and I’m not planning a summer holiday in Syria any time soon, but living in fear is not only unnecessary, but foolish. We will never defeat every last Islamic extremist who wishes to destroy the Western way of life; ideas are not killed with bullets. Instead, we should take away the only true power they have by refusing to overreact to terrorist violence.

Review: Grimsby – crude and vulgar

0

“I told you not to smoke.”

“I thought you just meant crack.”

These were some of the first lines in Sacha Baron Cohen’s recent movie, Grimsby. The comedy sees Nobby (Baron Cohen), an unemployed father of nine living in the northern English fishing town of Grimsby. From the outset we are told he is still searching for his long-lost brother after a 28 year separation. Queue, Sebastian (Strong). At a charity event, Nobby is reunited with his brother – who happens to be an MI6 agent with a surprisingly RP accent. After Nobby causes Sebastian to be blamed for a murder, forcing them on the run, a chain of ‘humorous’ events unfold which culminate in the two brothers making peace and saving the world. Rebel Wilson and Penelope Cruz both made the questionable decision to take minor roles in the movie, though the focus remains on the brothers’ relationship.

The description above makes it seem as though this film has a storyline, albeit a far-fetched one. It does not. The plot is a confused mix of a mocking take on working-class life in Grimsby, a conventional ‘spy-gone-rogue’ tale and an attempt at a heart-warming reunion with the message of family. All of this was paired with outrageous attempts at humour and crude sexual references. For me, it was so bad I had to cover my eyes. Perhaps I was being too harsh, but just one of the vulgar running jokes in this film was that numerous celebrities were diagnosed with AIDS from the blood of a young, wheelchair-bound Palestinian boy, said to be the ‘international symbol of peace.’ These celebrities included Daniel Radcliffe (though not the real one), and Donald Trump, whom, when infected actually roused applause from some members of the cinema audience. Perhaps that tells us more about opinions towards American politics than it does about the entertainment this film offered, but clearly such outrageous humour was, at times, enjoyed by other spectators. Or maybe they were just laughing because they didn’t know what else to do.

Sacha Baron Cohen has been in the press a lot recently after the controversial revival of ‘Ali G’ at the Oscars this year. He affronted the #OscarsSoWhite debate about lack of racial diversity in the nominees for this year’s Academy Awards by referring to himself “just another token black presenter.” He is renowned for his less-than politically correct attempts to use humour to bring attention to social issues, and the characters of Ali G and Borat were received well by critics. So, was that the case in Grimsby? I personally struggle to see how pointed generalisations about a working-class lifestyle will have a positive outcome. Any stereotypes which exist about the people of northern fishing towns are amplified; the opening sequence of the movie sees a queue of people outside the Job Centre, everyone walks around in England football shirts, and Nobby’s son Luke has a shaved head, a ploy for the family to claim benefits for his inexistent leukaemia.

The film does, however raise an interesting point on class inequality. Penelope Cruz’s character turns out to be the evil mastermind has a plan to “cure the world” by infecting all those present at the World Cup final, in her words, “the imbeciles”, with AIDS. In response, Cohen makes a rousing speech to his fellow Grimsby residents about their worth; they are the “scum” responsible for building the hospitals which are closed down by upper-class members of society. Can this be taken as a direct criticism of the current government cuts? He ends with the line, “scum cannot be washed away, ever”; if so, it’s one which still kicks the poor.

The film does reflect on positive aspects of working-class culture in other respects. The sense of community amongst the people of Grimsby means we always see them together, and the theme of family is prominent amongst the characters. We are obliged, in some ways to sympathise with the plight of those who are burdened with the stereotype of being worthless. But overall the film is counter-productive,  perpetuating negative assumptions of the ‘idle’ and ‘feckless’ poor who don’t know how to help themselves.

Whilst the film raises interesting arguments regarding social inequality, it failed to do so in a tasteful and productive way. Any attempt at progressive ideas amongst the crude humour were diminished by exaggerated stereotypes and a tiring plotline. If this were Sacha Baron Cohen’s first film, and he wasn’t propped up by past successes, I’m sure he would find himself as jobless as Nobby.

Words – Cherwell fiction

0

She doesn’t want to talk about it and I don’t want to hear her say it, so instead she asks me, “Clayton, how high are we?” I run my tongue across my lips and peer over the edge of the cliff. The tops of pine trees hover a few dozen feet below the soles of my shoes. I spit over the edge. It hits one of the lower rock formations, splatters. It is almost dark already. Off in the distance our town looks like a cluster of lightning bugs. Mom will be calling us home for dinner soon. My palms are sweating. I concentrate on the way the pebbles dig into my skin so I don’t have to look at her and ask about it.

“Pretty high,” I say.

“How high is ‘pretty’?”

“Really damn high.”

She sighs and leans her head back and reaches for her purse. She pulls out a pack of cigarettes, knocks it twice against her palm out of habit, and removes one. Next a lighter. Flick. The tip of the cigarette catches. Orange sparks glow at the end of her mouth. ‘“Really damn high’,” she repeats.

She offers me the pack. I decline with a scrunch of my lips and a jerky movement of my head. We’ve been here for nearly two hours and done nothing but smoke cigarettes and point vaguely to the distant shapes of buildings and try to assign the shapes to familiar places on the ground. We haven’t said anything important.

She blows a column of smoke out over the trees. We’ve always liked the smell of cigarette smoke—she and I—ever since we were kids—younger kids. Not sixteen and eighteen year old kids. Kids who didn’t smoke or drive shit cars or have sex or get pregnant. Little kids.

She’s smoking a cigarette now but I know she has joints tucked away in an old Altoids tin at the bottom of her purse. In another universe we’re up here smoking weed together and I’m a better brother. In this universe she smokes cigarettes with me and weed with her friends and drinks Fireball and coke at parties and probably blacks out and takes Polaroid pictures and doesn’t read books. She paints instead: India ink words surrounding acrylic girls with stick figure forms, letters curling around them like body fat and safety.

“So,” I say.

She says “so”, too. She takes another drag. I should tell her not to smoke, but I don’t. I think, maybe the smoke will kill it. I think, maybe the smoke will kill her, and regret it instantly.

“We should get home,” I say.

“Can you drop me off at Adam’s?” she says, not “What’s for dinner?” or “Yeah.”

“No,” I say. “Mom said she wants us to come home.”

She takes another drag. I don’t like Adam, even though I don’t know really him. I think about her carving apologies for breathing into her legs and asking guys she barely knows to drive her to abortion clinics and liquor stores and her sitting on the edges of parties drinking Fireball and coke and taking Polaroid pictures and guys talking about her ripped leggings and the things they’ll do to her when she’s drunk enough.

“Please?” she says, less like begging. More like she knows I’ll give in.

“I don’t think so,” I say.

She finishes her cigarette. She tosses the burning end over the edge of the cliff. We watch it fall, hit rocks softly, anti-climatic. Without meaning to, the image of her jumping plays in my head: Not thinking about what it would be like to hit the bottom. Just for the fun of it.

She says, “Can you drop me off at Molly’s then?”

“Mom wants us home.” It has worn thin, this threat of disappointment. I wonder what she’ll do when I’m gone. When she’s up here with her friends smoking weed and the trees are brown and I’m at school and I have forgotten to call.

“I’ll call Mom on the way there and ask,” she lies.

It’s dark now. Molly lives on the other side of the mountain. If we leave now, I’ll be home after the leftovers are put away. Dad will be in the living room, not speaking. Home but not home. Mom will be doing dishes. I bet she only set the table for three. I bet she knew I’d come home alone.

“Are you pregnant?” I ask.

She laughs. “What?”

I will not ask again, the advantage of answering a question with a question.

“Come on,” I say. “Let’s go.”

We stand and walk back to the car. Evenings are cold now. I left my sweatshirt on someone’s floor. It smells like other people’s sweat and spilled beer and accidents and mistakes. The things I tell her not to do but she does because she’s sixteen.

We get in the car. I start the engine. The headlights chase a deer into the safety of the trees. I say, “I’ll take you to Adam’s” because it’s closer to home.

“Cool. Thanks,” she says.

She turns on the radio and rolls the window down. I don’t object even though the wind is cold as we drive down the mountain. I picture her painting a girl in a brightly colored dress with words curled around her in a series of “yeses” that all read like “help”. Somewhere, in a book I haven’t read yet but probably said I have, are all the words I’m supposed to say. But I don’t want to talk about it and she doesn’t want to say it so we drive, slowly, and I wait for her to change her mind and she hums along to the music like an apology burning the insides of her lips.

Common People festival playlist

0

Rob Da Bank’s Common People Oxford will be ruling the May Bank Holiday in style on May 28 and 29. Here are some of the best tracks from the line-up’s offerings to get you in the festival mood.

1. Duran Duran – ‘Girls On Film’

You could go for the obscure, the underrated, but when a band have a banger like this one, there is no point trying to be clever about it. Everyone’s hoping the Birmingham group will bring out this groovy number as they headline Common People’s Saturday night.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0]

2. Primal Scream – ‘Movin’ On Up’

Again, it is Primal Scream’s likeliest Common People crowd pleaser that we are all hoping for. The end notes of this orginal version sway into a motown-like feel, and waiting to see if and how the group put a current spin on this 1991 release is half the fun as they are set to headline the Sunday night.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnkjvECEQr4]

3. Katy B – ‘5AM’

Not as eponymous with the Peckham-raised singer as her hit single ‘Katy on a Mission,’ ‘5AM’ is set to get the party started in preparation for Duran Duran on Saturday night. With classic pop builds and an easy sing-along chorus, the beats in this song are unmissable.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDE2OMZtExY]

4. Craig David’s TS5

Craig David started his TS5 DJ sets as exclusive Miami pre-parties, and now plays to full clubs in Cannes, St Tropez and Dubai. There is not just one hit that we can count on to fill the ‘Fill Me In’ star’s set, but watching some footage of his previous nights is a good starting point for the Sunday night atmosphere we can expect come the May Bank Holiday weekend.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXgDsA_UTjY]

5. Public Enemy – ‘Don’t Believe the Hype’

Classic 80s hip-hop from the New York group will be infiltrating the Oxfordshire countryside in May, and what better song could prove their politicaly outspoken credentials than 1988’s ‘Don’t Believe the Hype’?

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vQaVIoEjOM]

6. Jamie Lawson – ‘Wasn’t Expecting That’

Amongst a whole host of more raucous festival flavours, Jamie Lawson’s calmer acoustic guitar-driven pop will be a welcome addition to Saturday’s early evening programme, particularly if the sun comes out. ‘I Wasn’t Expecting That’ epitomises Lawson’s Ed Sheeran-like vibe.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-lI_tgQMMk]

7. Cuban Brothers – ‘So Sweet’

It’s unlikely anyone will be complaining during the Cuban Brothers’ smooth, soulful set as ‘So Sweet’ is just one of a multitude of similarly lively summery tunes. This group are set to charm their way through Saturday afternoon with groovy dance moves and a truly eclectic performance onstage.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca9cxelkQbY]

8. Ghostpoet – ‘Sorry My Love, It’s You Not Me’

Whilst a lot of these acts will be a fantastic accompaniment to a cider and a dance in the May sun (we can only hope), Ghostpoet’s performance will require a little more concentration. Obaro Ejimiwe weaves spoken-word and raspy soul against tackling beats and riffs to give an honest soundtrack to urban life. This track particularly exposes Ejimiwe’s talent of poignancy and frankess in lyrics, alongside a soulful melody line.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIR_Qs3tbFU]

For more information and to buy tickets, check out the Common People Oxford website here.

Oxford least affordable city in the UK

0

Oxford has been declared the least affordable city in the United Kingdom in the midst of the affordable housing crisis affecting the South of England, according to Lloyd’s.

In Oxford, average prices are at 10.68 times local earnings, with Winchester coming a close second at 10.54 and London in third at 10.06.

The bank’s analysis revealed that there is no longer a city in the South of England where house prices are less than seven and a half times average local incomes.

Leader of Oxford city council, Bob Price, told Cherwell, “Oxford has held this unenviable position for the past seven years. The city area is highly developed with virtually no sizeable brownfield sites left, and the natural areas for housing growth to the north and south are designated Green Belt and in other District Council planning control.

“The Green Belt has become Green Noose condemning half of the city’s workers to live many miles from their employment and commute into Oxford on congested roads. The impact of ridiculously high house prices and the requirements of commuting are causing major recruitment and retention problems for the universities, schools, the health service and for many firms in the booming high tech sectors where there is major competition for labour.”

Oxford professor of human geography Danny Dorling, author of a book on housing affordability, told Cherwell, “The question people in the university should be asking is who will be able to afford to live in Oxford who will teach their children, empty their bins and staff the shops they use? And who owns so much of the land around the end of the city within cycling distance of Carfax, where people could live who work in the city? Only after asking these two questions should we worry about how unaffordable housing is for our own students and staff.”

In its analysis, Lloyd’s noted that the last time prices reached such a high was at the pinnacle of the real estate boom in 2008, just prior to the financial crisis.

The insurance market’s analysis is unique in that it compares local house prices with local earnings rather than national averages.

As a result, the most expensive house prices are not in London but in other parts of the southeast.

In Cambridge, Brighton and Bath, prices are all now nearly 10 times local earnings, while in Bristol and Southampton prices are closer to eight times earnings.

Lloyd’s attributes the increasing problem with affordability to the slow growth of wages, which has fallen far behind the rate that house prices are increasing.

Sixty years ago, buyers could usually find a home with a mortgage three to four times their income, but this is now only the case in Derry in Northern Ireland where house prices in the city are currently 3.81 times local incomes.

Although the majority of the cities branded “most affordable” by Lloyd’s are in the North, Scotland and Northern Ireland, buyers will still find it difficult to afford a home if local salaries are taken into consideration.

OUSU Rent and Accomodations and Oxford Homeless Pathways have been contacted for comment. The University declined to comment.

A bittersweet day for Oxford on the Thames

0

It’s over: the Oxford men’s crew has finally tasted defeat, after three successive victories in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Losing by a two and a half lengths, the Blues were overmatched on the roiling waters by the Light Blues, who struggled less with the tough conditions.

But the day, attended by an estimated 150,000 spectators, was not completely grim for Oxford. The women’s first boat claimed a rout over their competitors, winning by over a minute – in large part thanks to the Light Blues coming close to sinking after the Chiswick Steps. This is the women’s fourth straight victory in the competition.

The reserve races were split as well. Isis, Oxford men’s reserve boat, beat Cambridge’s boat, Goldie, by two lengths, although Osiris, the women’s reserve boat, lost to the Light Blues’ boat, Blondie, by three.

The sweet

In the women’s race, Oxford’s smoother, longer style soon showed through, as they quickly caught Cambridge. Coming in to the Surrey Bend, the women made their move to pull half a length ahead of Cambridge.

It was an easier contest from there, with the Blues starting to pull away at the Chiswick Steps, where the Oxford cox made the tactical decision to find shelter close to the bank while Cambridge tried to remain defiant in the open stream. Now with a 4-length lead, Oxford sped on while Cambridge began to take on water, the Light Blues sinking ever lower into the Thames.

The waving of the red flag by umpire Simon Harris signalled the end of the race for Cambridge, and Oxford extended its lead yet further to win by 71 seconds and 24 lengths.

After the race, Women’s Boat Club President Maddy Badcott praised cox Morgan Baynham-Williams.

“We are so lucky to have Morgan, she smashed it today,” she told the BBC. “Those conditions are probably the worst I have experienced on the Tideway and I’m so glad it has worked out for us and our training paid off.”

…and the bitter

Meanwhile, Cambridge were the favourites coming in to the men’s race and their superior confidence and weight advantage soon became clear in rough conditions. Though both crews got off to a strong start, achieving a fast rate of 45 strokes over the first minute of the race, after the race settled Cambridge began to assert their superiority. Gradually, their four returning Light Blues helped the crew edge out Oxford inch by inch.

Oxford did well to stay within range of Cambridge’s coattails around a Surrey Bend that seemed to to favour the Light Blues, but their effort there proved to be too much. Tired, Oxford were edged out by Cambridge as the crews passed the Chiswick Steps. And it was home clear from Cambridge from there, who won in a time of 18 minutes and 38 seconds, two and a half lengths ahead of Oxford’s crew.

After the race, the Cambridge coach said, “I think this is the start of the turn of the tide for Cambridge.”

Of course, the Oxonians disagreed. When asked whether it was an end of an era by BBC, Oxford men’s captain Morgan Gerlak replied emphatically: “absolutely not.”

Additional reporting by Harry Gosling.

Heaney’s Aeneid: When is a Translation not a Translation?

0

When asked to describe his approach to writing, Heaney replied that it was ‘like being an altar boy in the sacristy getting ready to go out onto the main altar’. His translation of Aeneid VI is certainly worthy of that description, steeped as it is in humility and respect for its author. There is more of Heaney in this than the boy in the sacristy, though: it is a gift for all whom he taught, and who taught him. He reminds us in his preface of the debt owed to his Latin teacher at A Level, who was ‘forever sighing, ‘Och, boys, I wish it were Book VI’’ they were studying, instead of Book IX – this is a last piece of homework, completed fifty years late. It was, however, also an ‘impulse’, brought on by the birth of his first granddaughter. Heaney, in breathing life into Book VI, is very much aware of his own, ever changing relationship with the text, as well as how much he has changed. In this book – neither ‘version nor crib’, he becomes both Aeneas and Anchises: at once headstrong schoolboy, loving father, and grandfather.

His style is unadorned, Latinate expressions couched in earthy, almost onomatopoeic utterances. Charon, in language which surely rivals the original, is ‘surly, filthy and bedraggled’, clothed in ‘a grimy cloak’. Plain, blunt to the point of aggression, they typify a manner which is both rural and sophisticated. Earlier, the Golden Bough is ‘green-leafed’ and ‘refulgent’ in the same breath. Heaney’s word choice, to my mind, reveals yet more markedly his love-hate relationship with Book VI – why he thought it ‘the best of books and the worst of books’: smatterings of ostentation remind us that it was, he thought ‘worst because of its imperial certitude, its celebration of Rome’s manifest destiny’. It remains best, though for the ‘twilit fetch of its language’, and this is something Heaney has unequivocally mastered.

Heaney – dare I say it – might even trump Virgil in this respect, at least as far as the final portion of the book goes: he makes all these empty platitudes palatable. I found, in Anchises’ potted history of Roman victories, moments where Heaney turned this into something more than just the beleaguered scribblings of a ‘sixth form homunculus’ – moments like ‘Fabricius, the indomitable and frugal’, a pairing far richer than Virgil’s own ‘powerful in poverty’ (parvoque potentem). I don’t mean to provoke any classicists’ complaints, it’s just that it works, really really well. Heaney is the master of using an intriguing, atypical word to render the ordinary as something more. Here, amidst a conscious programme of Augustan propaganda, he grapples with, and, I think, truly succeeds in making this vision Anchises presents – he bemoaned it as ‘something of a test for reader and translator alike’ – a triumph of ordinary marvels over imperial.

Anchises, who lingers ‘fatherly and intent’, must have been a difficult figure to write up for Heaney. Their first moment of meeting, tender as it is, is shot through with reminders of the father’s mortality. The moment of their embrace, where Anchises passes through Aeneas ‘like a breeze between his hands’ cannot be read without thinking of Heaney’s absence. The whole book now functions as a kind of farewell letter, this episode – of the intermingling of death and life – is poignant in its prescience.

There are, however, moments which are poignant in and of themselves. No more so than Aeneas’ unrequited entreaties to Dido. When she blanks him – the greatest ‘bitch, please’ moment in literature – she does so ‘no more than if her features had been carved in flint or Parian marble’. Heaney has Virgil’s knack for condensing whole emotional cataclysms into a mere sentence: here, ‘flint’ suggests the former flame of her passion; it becomes ‘marble’, cold and unresponsive. These are words crafted to inspire close reading; they also demand to be read aloud. The speeches, especially the Sibyl’s, are truly magnificent in scope – try Ian McKellen’s version, recorded for Radio 4, for a suitably impassioned attempt – and phrases like ‘an elm, copious, darkly aflutter’ float on the tongue as much as in the mind.

Undoubtedly, then, Heaney overcomes ‘the fleeting, fitful anxieties that afflict the literary translator’. And translator, I think, is too paltry a word: though Heaney typically dismisses it as nothing more than ‘classics homework’, it is far more than an homage. At the final line, the last few words, ‘sterns cushion on sand’ are the same phrasing Heaney uses as the ships first land in Italia in the first few lines. His repetition is not Virgil’s own. It is, I think, Heaney suggesting that this journey he has undertaken, alongside Aeneas, from young to old, is only the beginning. If this is a farewell letter, its final note is one of hope.

The 162nd Varsity Boat Race: Live Blog

0

5:10 That’s it from us today. Thank you for tuning in; we hope you enjoyed our coverage. It’s been a bittersweet day for the dark blues, with a disappointing loss for the men but a fantastic victory for the women. Cambridge, we’ll see you again next year.

4:40 The BBC asks Morgan Gerlak, the Oxford men’s captain, “Is this the end of an era?”

“Absoltuely not,” he responds.

4:38 Who exactly does Stan Louloudis think he is? Outrageous stuff from the former OUBC President.

4:34

4:31 Cambridge have won the men’s race.

4:29 Oxford may have won in 2013, 2014, and 2015, but Cambridge have got the victory this time.

4:25 Cambridge’s cox looks behind him to see Oxford pushing hard about two lengths behind them. One kilometre to go.

4:21 Both crews fighting choppy waters, Cambridge still a length ahead.

4:18 Oxford putting pressure on the Tabs around the bend and looking more relaxed. How will these crews face up to the the bad conditions?

4:16 Both crews approach the mile post, Cambridge ahead but rowing at 34 strokes per minute, Oxford at 35.

4:11 And the men are off!

4:05 Our man on the ground at the finish line is unimpressed by the BBC’s coverage, with many reportedly turning to the Cherwell live blog for Boat Race coverage.

3:59 The men’s reserve race, unlike the women’s, ends in favour of Oxford.

3:50

3:46

3:41

3:38 The reserve crews are still battling it out.

3:36

3:35

3:35 Oxford celebrating under Chiswick Bridge.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13251%%[/mm-hide-text]

3:33 Oxford win the women’s boat race. Cambridge still pushing strong, despite having nearly sunk.

3:32 Meanwhile…

3:28 Live on BBC, “There’s a good chance this Cambridge boat might not make it to the finish line.” Oxford’s decision to head for the bank pays off as they secure a solid lead.

3:26 Oxford securing their lead now, and moving into the bank away from the middle of the river, looking for shelter from the wind and rough waters.

3:22 Oxford pull ahead for a moment, but the rough water proves too much for them to sustain the lead. Cambride still hanging on.

3:18 Both crews dangerously close to one another for a moment there. Oxford now almost a whole length ahead.

3:16 Looking promising for Oxford going through the bend round Craven Cottage – half a length ahead.

3:12

3:11 The women’s race begins!

2:49 Both the OUWBC Squad and CUBC reserve crews have now boated. Strong winds mean that Cambridge may have an advantage with heavier crews. 

 

2:43 Lightning along the Thames

2:42 

2:42 Proof of how windy it is today. Let’s hope everything goes smoothly regardless of our typically bad weather!

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13250%%[/mm-hide-text]

2:39 The sun is shining in Mortlake now, thankfully! [mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13249%%[/mm-hide-text]

2:36 Men’s blue boat crews arrive at the start line in Putney.

2:35 

2:34 

2:32 Just 45 minutes to go now until the start of the women’s boat race. Excitement building down at the finish line. Sky brightening up too.

2:28 The crew are preparing to push off. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13248%%[/mm-hide-text]

2:25 

2:22 Tune into in 10 minutes for live coverage of The 2016 Cancer Research UK Boat Races

2:16 

It’s very windy on the Tideway today and conditions are likely to prove tough for both crews. Cambridge, as the heavier crew in both the men’s and women’s blue boat races, should be in a better position to weather the wind and rain.

2:06 

2:05 

2:02 In other news, our Varsity Football match has reached half time point. Oxford are leading 1-0. 

2:00 Thunder has been heard at the finish line!

1:52 

1:51 

1:36 

1:34 Oxford win the toss and choose Surrey station. Cambridge will take Middlesex. This is looking to be advantage for Oxford round the first bend. 

1:10 The Boat Races Official Twitter Channel 

12:10 More than a quarter of a million people are expected to be present at the Oxford vs Cambridge annual boat race this afternoon along the River Thames. The race will begin at Putney Bridge travelling on to its midway point at Hammersmith, through Barnes and finishing at Chiswick Bridge. 

The women’s race is due to start at 3:10pm and the men’s following at 4:10pm. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13246%%[/mm-hide-text]

Image: The Telegraph

Oxford crew Mens

  • Bow: George McKirdy (27yrs / 190cm / 76.8kg / Teddy Hall)
  • 2: James White (19yrs / 187cm / 87.0kg / Christ Church)
  • 3: Morgan Gerlak (23yrs / 185cm / 85.8kg / Keble)
  • 4: Joshua Bugajski (25yrs / 194cm / 96.4kg / Keble)
  • 5: Leo Carrington (25yrs / 189cm / 87.0kg / Kellogg)
  • 6: Jørgen Tveit (20yrs /194cm / 82.4kg / St John’s)
  • 7: Jamie Cook (23yrs / 188cm / 84.0kg / St Cross)
  • Stroke: Nik Hazell (23yrs / 199cm /94.8kg / Christ Church)
  • Cox: Sam Collier (20yrs / 170cm / 56.2kg / New)

Oxford Crew Women

  • Bow: Emma Lukasiewicz (24yrs / 174cm / 60.4kg / Hertford)
  • 2: Emma Spruce (23yrs / 178cm / 72.0kg / Wolfson)
  • 3: Joanne Jansen (23yrs / 180cm / 67.0kg / New)
  • 4: Ruth Siddorn (20yrs / 181cm /75.2kg / Keble)
  • 5: Ëlo Luik (27yrs / 186cm / 78.2kg / Wolfson)
  • 6: Anastasia Chitty (22yrs / 175cm / 71.0kg / Pembroke)
  • 7: Maddy Badcott (20 yrs / 178cm / 74.8kg / Wadham)
  • Stroke: Lauren Kedar (20yrs / 178cm / 65.6kg / Exeter)
  • Cox : Maddy Baynham-Williams (21yrs / 167 cm / 60.0kg / Oriel)

Cambridge crew Mens

Felix Newman Bow, Ali Abbasi, Charles Fisher, Clemens Auersperg, Luke Juckett, Henry Hoffstot, Ben Ruble, Lance Tredell Stroke, Ian Middleton Cox

Cambridge crew Women

Ashton Brown, Fiona Macklin, Alice Jackson, Théa Zabell, Daphne Martschenko, Zara Goozee, Hannah Roberts (P), Myriam Goudet, Rosemary Ostfeld Cox

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%13243%%[/mm-hide-text]

11:50 Our Sport Editor, Aigerim Saudabayeva, has already taken up her spot by the Thames. Around 250,000 spectators are expected to watch the Boat Races today. Make sure you get down there early to secure a prime spot!