Wednesday 18th June 2025
Blog Page 1118

Freak: Ah…Puberty?

0

★★★★☆

Director Clara Davis’ new production of Anna Jordan’s Freak is an energetic and touching study of female sexuality. We follow the cast of two, Leah (Emily Albery) and Georgie (Lily Erskine), as they attempt to build their own identities and deconstruct them through new sexual encounters. But when does sex make you human, give you power? And when does it make you less than that: inhuman, subservient?

It is forgivable to come to the show with dark forebodings of awkwardly ‘gritty’ discourse on ‘daring’ topics. However, Freak is not gritty, but rather messy in its tone – more naturally real than self-consciously realistic – and there’s something commendable about a show that isn’t trying to shock its audience with its subjects, choosing instead to examine them closely and honestly. Everything, including masturbation, the watching of pornography, pubic hair, wanting to be objectified, fetishes, and loss of virginity.

The play is structured by interspersing monologues from the characters. Our first glimpses of them – Leah’s angst-ridden dancing, Georgie retelling her hyper-sexualised dreams – establish their personalities immediately. The two were able to sustain a high level of energy despite acting alone for the most part, working with a great dynamic.

Both characters are instantly relatable – in particular, Leah’s more light-hearted travails in the cringe-making world of adolescent sexuality prompted all-too-knowing laughter from the audience. These moments of humour were well-timed and well-executed. With Georgie’s storyline taking a dark and melancholy twist, Leah’s was able to juxtapose in a way that gave the audience relief at more emotionally taxing moments. The resulting pathos left the audience with a sense of female companionship, and raised questions about sexual authority and the importance of intimacy.

The show’s concerns were greatly helped by dance and the often-ironic use of music. Meghan Trainor’s ‘Dear Future Husband’ and Jessie J’s ‘Bang Bang’ deftly juxtapose an image of female sexuality in popular culture – supine, man-dependent, eager to please – with the grubby reality of womanhood. Both Leah and Georgie dance to music at intervals, using the opportunity to explore their bodies and build their sexual confidence. The mirror-effect of both girls simultaneously dancing or undressing or making themselves up was created by the set; a double bed to share and two distinct styles of décor on each side gave the impression of two sets split-screened. Having both girls on stage, acting or silent, gave a real sense of companionship throughout.

The only criticisms that could be noted were that there were a few very good but ill-fitting metaphors that were perhaps a little too high-flown for the characters (however, even here it ought to be noted that Albery and Erskine pulled them off smoothly enough to be convincing). There was also a moment of broken-action quoting of Beyoncé that slightly pushed the performance into something more trivial and quirk-for-quirk’s-sake. But that’s it. My only two complaints. Which is not bad going for a two hour show. 

Freak is a refreshing play, approaching its themes in an authentically brutal tone. Its cast is captivating, its aesthetic solid and supportive, its plot dynamic and heart-breaking; a very well executed and satisfyingly well-meaning production

Robert Harris elected Union President for Trinity 2016

0

The results of yesterday’s Oxford Union elections have been announced.

The current Librarian, Robert Harris, New College, has been elected President for Trinity term, with current Secretary Ssuuna Golooba-Mutebi as Librarian-Elect, Nikolay Koshikov as Treasurer-Elect and Henna Dattani as in-coming Secretary for Hilary 2016.

The results were announced at around 5am this morning.

The top four positions were all elected unopposed with it also being a particularly successful night for their election slate, which saw all of their candidates elected except for two Secretary’s Committee member hopefuls.

On Saturday of Eighth Week, Stuart Webber will take over from Charlie Vaughan as President for Hilary term, following his elction victory in June 2015.

The results: (Those elected in bold, with first preference votes shown)

President-Elect:

Robert Harris – 957 

RON – 129 

 

Librarian-Elect:

Ssuuna Golooba-Mutebi – 932

RON – 104

 

Treasurer-Elect:

Nikolay Koshikov – 882

RON – 120 

 

Secretary:

Henna Dattani – 870

RON – 102

 

Standing Commitee:

Ellen Milligan – 187

Jaskaran Rajput – 183

Edward Grigg – 181

Frances Varley – 171

Tycho Onnasch – 161

Harrison Edmonds – 103

Elizabeth Webb – 89

Osuobeni – 72

 

Secretary’s Committee Hilary 2016:

Jensen – 114

Watson – 93

Kitchen – 91

Hopkins-Powell – 89

Stonehill – 83

Al-Yasiri – 81

Banerjee – 80

O’Sullivan – 78

Jonas – 66

Eva – 57

Dillistone – 49

 

 

 

When Fashion and Art Converge

0

“Fashion is art” is a common refrain throughout design houses and fashion weeks, particularly when observing the runways of iconic designers such as Dior, Alexander McQueen and Chanel. But despite the numerous comparisons, there is always a fine distinction drawn between ‘fashion’ and ‘art’; although both are admired, critiqued, and carefully scrutinized, the gowns of major fashion corporations are usually considered by the court of public opinion to be more suited to the glossy pages of Elle than the galleries of respected art museums.

Yet inside the circuits of these fashion houses, designers frequently take inspiration from these famed artists for their creations. Designer Alexander McQueen often utilised delicate lines and fluid fabric cuts to recreate the elegance of Impressionist and Art Deco works of the early twentieth century. His ‘Savage Beauty’ collection featured a pale green dress with forest green marbling and long, sheer-cut silk skirts heavily reminiscent of Monet’s most famous work, his stunning water-lily paintings. The headlining photo, which features the dress replicated three times, each with the skirt of the gown in motion, mimics the atmosphere of the water lilies collection in the Musée de L’Orangerie, where the goal is to completely surround the audience with the beauty of the work.

He also borrows from later movements, with his love of the Art Deco movement most easily seen in one of his shoe collections. The dark blue shoe, with its swirl-stretched sole and vine pattern around the stiletto, bears a heavy similarity to pieces like the Wisteria Dining Room and the entrances to the Paris Métro (the shoes also maintain the vibe that the plant vines are quite literally growing up around them – several Parisiens remarked that they found the new Métro entrances eerie when they were fi rst installed). Another one of his formalwear designs features bright gold leaves and plants on a cream background; the cheerful colours, nature-based design, and softness of the lines draw a parallel with Van Gogh’s ‘Daffodils’.

It also isn’t just Alexander McQueen who fills collections with inspiration from the first modern artists. Dior and Christian Louboutin are both known for their fascination with ballet in their runway shows, not unlike Degas. Dior features soft pastels and numerous layers of delicate fabrics, including tulle, in order to produce delicate gowns with lots of motion as the models walked. Degas himself declared that his obsession with painting ballerinas, his favourite and most well-known subject, came from his love of pretty colours and clothes in movement as they danced. Louboutin would also create a collection based around one of the most well-known symbols of ballet: a collection of pointed shoes, each featuring an impossibly thin stiletto heel and his signature red sole. As the beauty and grace of ballet and the clothes that made it possible had captivated Degas, so too do they captivate the designers of today.

The difference, therefore, does not lie in the critical validity of their works, nor in their passion for creation. The only distinct difference between the artists and designers is how they construct their art, be it on canvas or in fabric. Just because we have the rare opportunity to see them create such enormous volumes of work and to examine them so closely, unlike the cold separation that exists in art galleries, does not diminish the value of their creations. We should only consider ourselves so fortunate that we have this opportunity now; for someday, like the once-loathed Monet, Degas, and Van Gogh, they may indeed be seen only in museums

The Oxstew: One Bad Thing After Another

0

The Oxford Union has come under severe criticism for the queuing crisis that erupted this week after their EU debate. However, The OxStew can confirm that the scandal begins far before the EU debate. Following a Freedom of Information Request that someone else submitted, The OxStew can exclusively reveal that the Union have been using CONTROVERSIAL and ILLEGAL scientific methods in order to maintain a strong Union interest. They have been emitting amnesiacparticles from the Union’s turrets. These work to make you a) forget how long you have been queuing for b) forget how much money you spent in order to stand in the fucking queue and c) forget that you have an essay to write, and a life to live.

However, this week, the queue surpassed the 100-mile radius which the particles have been trained to reach. Thus queuers soon opened their weary eyes, realised the cruel injustice of their situation, and said something about it.

The Union President, Mr Snakey, commented, “We had a very large discussion about ways of handling queues. We considered ballots, applications, creating an intimate Facebook for all our baes. The amnesiac-particles were our last resort. I admit, we cheated you, and we are sorry. But hey! We’ve done worse. Hehe”

 It has been confirmed that the dubious decision to invite Germaine Greer to debate at the Union is part of a ground breaking new technique to reduce queue size.

Snakey commented, “I had a real moment of clarity. I thought to myself, what do students love? What do students hate? And then it hit me right in the middle of my slimey face. Equality, morality, integrity. These three elements are integral to being a student. Take one away? They’ll crumble. It’s like the fire triangle. Take one element away, and puff. Puff goes the queue.

 “Simple. Give them Germy G, students will boycott it in five minutes. No queue issues, no nothing. Then we can all get back to doing the things we imagined we were going to be doing when we first got involved with the Union. If you know what I mean. Is there a way of telling your readers that I just winked then? If you could write the emoticon wink face or something that would be great.”

Germaine Greer declined to comment on the situation. However, one student did exclusively speak with The OxStew. They had no comment about Greer, but described the EU debate queue experience as “disgusting”, and “quite squidgy. Especially when you got pushed into someone in front of you who was wearing a rucksack.”

The International Student: Look east Mr Cameron

0

“Dear Donald” – David Cameron personally addressed the recent letter to his former Polish counterpart and now President of the European Council, Donald Tusk. The letter makes it quite clear that a wholesale reform of Britain’s special relationship with the EU is not likely anytime soon. In the coming months, Cameron may find himself looking for allies in Eastern Europe.

Cameron is between a rock and a hard place. He has to balance Eurosceptic demands at home with calls for tighter monetary and fiscal union abroad. But you cannot help thinking, that if last week’s letter is Cameron’s idea of renegotiating the UK’s special relationship, he is putting lipstick on a pig.

Cameron’s letter has been a charade of concessions. For starters, formally dropping the “Ever Closer Union” is semantics. So long as the UK remains in a “dynamic relationship” with the EU, it must accept the direct effect and supremacy of any new EU law. The question of reinstating precedence of national law over EU law has been replaced with a much milder request for national parliamentary control over EU legislation.

With the EU leaders embroiled in bringing Greece and Italy back into line, Cameron’s idea of a special relationship is hardly a priority. Thankfully for the British PM though, Britain is not alone in questioning how the principles of subsidiarity and European democracy have evolved. Eastern countries are also becoming increasingly self-conscious of the two-tier Europe. The distance of voters from the EU’s bureaucratic leviathan is another shared democratic concern. Opportunities are starting to arise, such as with last week’s inauguration of the nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) government in Poland. Cameron may therefore start seeking Eastern European allies.

Britain and Poland’s new governments pragmatically share an interest in reforming Europe. Poland and the UK are the EU’s two largest non-euro member states. In a poll of Poles last month, 81 per cent of Poles opposed joining the Eurozone. The new PiS government (which postponed adopting the Euro during its last term) is likely to put forward demands for safeguards for non-euro member states. Moreover, this week, Poland’s new Foreign Minister has challenged the EU’s refugee quota scheme, to the subsequent liking of other European counterparts.

Even aside from shared interests, the UK is Poland’s second-largest trading partner. Poland is keen to keep Britain in for trade, employment and education (just look, over 200 Poles are currently here at Oxford). To avoid Brexit, the Polish government may even help Britain push for EU reform negotiations.

Broader cooperation with Poland would also call for a change of narrative at home. Poles and Brits have a history of being brothers in arms – from the Battle of Britain to their common membership in the EU and NATO. EU migrants are hardly charity cases. They contributed an estimated £20 billion more in taxes than they received in benefits over the past decade. A more balanced public debate would be a good development.

So, David Cameron – look eastwards. While the Eurozone fights its own battles, for a timely EU reform package, you may need to call on some old allies.

Interview: Sir Steve Redgrave

0

For anyone growing up in the small town of Marlow in Buckinghamshire, it is hard not to notice the esteem in which the British rower, motivational speaker and sports ambassador Sir Steve Redgrave is held. From the larger-than-life-size statue that stands atop a mound in Marlow’s park to the Redgrave Sports Centre opened in 2013, the five-time Olympic gold medallist really is the pride of Marlow, born and raised.

So it is with childlike anticipation that I await the phone conversation with our local hero. As someone who has never got my feet wet in the rowing sense, I feel somewhat unqualified to conduct the interview, but I cannot resist engaging him on the topic about which my knowledge stems exclusively from a rather hazy Summer VIIIs.

With our readership in mind I delve into the waters of the Tideway, keen to hear Sir Steve’s thoughts on one of the most famous and popular events of the rowing calendar. He explains that he thought it is the tradition of the Boat Race which makes it so appealing to such a wide audience. Such is the fascination with the two universities of Oxford and Cambridge, not just here in the UK but across the world, that rivalries between the two naturally attract interest. Anything that sees these prestigious establishments pitted against each other – from the sporting varsities to University Challenge – is watched with curiosity and excitement.

We then move on to the topic of gender equality in sport, taking as starting point the two historic Varsities happening this year: the Women’s Boat Race on the Tideway and the Women’s Rugby Varsity at Twickenham. Redgrave informs me that this certainly reflects the rising popularity and regard of women’s rowing, a trend that is starting at the very bottom with “a lot of young girls taking up the sport – more than ever before.” He has recognised a similar phenomenon with women’s rugby, particularly since the English team’s victory in the 2014 World Cup. However, he underlines that there is a lot of work to be done on the long road to equality in this particular sport as is painfully evident when one compares the coverage of the recent men’s World Cup to that of last year’s women’s competition.

 Redgrave is an ambassador of sport amongst young people and of the continuing legacy of the 2012 London Olympics. He strongly believes that exposing both boys and girls to sport at a young age can act to remedy the gender inequality of some sports at a higher level.

 “It’s a very difficult area,” he replies. “You need to promote sport, but whether it’s for equality or just for the sake of giving kids something to do, encouraging the young to get involved and get active is always the right way to go about it.”

More specifically, with regard to the gender imbalance in some sports, he states that the effect is often self-propelling. Taking women’s soccer in the US as an example, he explains how an increase in school-age girls playing the sport caused an explosion of interest, propelling it into the public sphere. He hopes to see the English game move in a similar direction, with the semi-professional FA Women’s Premier League gaining increasing media coverage and attention.

For Redgrave, it seems that sporting publicity and exposure are crucially important elements for the success of any sport. As Chairman of Henley Royal Regatta, he hopes that live streaming of this year’s event on YouTube will extend the reach of one of the world’s most prestigious annual rowing regattas. He informs me that this year witnessed the greatest number of American teams entering ever. The live streaming, he tells me, allowed friends and relatives to watch competitors row from thousands of miles away which – given the size of the US and the rarelyvideoed nature of rowing – may well have been a first and very special occasion. Here in England, where sporting fixtures are often no more than a stone’s throw from home, we somewhat take it for granted that family and friends can easily watch and support us in our sporting endeavours.

With so many students participating in rowing at all levels here at Oxford, I am interested to hear how Redgrave has managed pursuing a career in an activity which presumably started as a hobby. He tells me that throughout his career he has seen rowing become an increasingly respected sport, from amateur status when he started out to attracting an average of 30,000 people at each race during the London Olympics.

However he outlines the near impossibility of making a living solely through rowing. In a sport where a world championship race rarely draws more than 1,000 spectators, athletes have to survive on grants from national organisations, sponsorship and the proceeds from related work such as motivational speeches and sport promotion. In talking with Redgrave, it is easy to see but difficult to appreciate the difficulties and challenges he has had to overcome to achieve what he has.

We end our conversation on a more personal, light-hearted note. Here in Oxford, the Isis is seen with varying affection by rowers and punters alike, and the river is arguably one of the most beautiful parts of the city. From years of training both on and off the water I assume he must be fairly well acquainted with the Thames – does he have any specific parts that he is particularly fond of, I wonder?

He laughs, and tells me yes, he does know the river rather well. He says he has always loved rivers and streams, particularly in mountains. Closer to home however, he names the Thames from Marlow to Cookham in Berkshire as a highly regarded stretch for rowing, where he trained extensively during his career.

He divulges to me that he has just bought a slipper launch locally from Andrew’s Boatyard – a long-term ambition of his – and is looking forward to chugging up the river next summer. “I’d like to go upstream from Marlow to Oxford, stopping at various pubs along the way.”

As I thanked Redgrave for his time, I assured him that even if I am hopelessly ignorant about rowing, here was something at least with which I could empathise.

OUWRC drops kit for eating disorders charity

0

Oxford University’s Women’s Rugby team has released a naked charity calendar, triggering widespread attention from the national press and social media. To boost exposure before the Varsity game, the team has chosen to pose naked and work with Beat, a charity fighting against eating disorders and promoting positive body image.

The team is currently preparing for the annual clash with rivals Cambridge, a match that will take place in Twickenham for the first time. Delighted at the prospect of playing on the same pitch as the men’s team on 10th December, OURFC Women seized the opportunity to seek publicity in the run up to its upcoming Varsity fixture.

Focusing particularly on realistic rugby positions, the photos taken at the team’s Iffley grounds aim to raise the sport’s profile among women. In a video explaining the team’s mentality and approach to playing a sport commonly stereotyped as masculine and brutal, the women say that it is “just another way for [them] to enjoy [themselves]”, and encourage other young women to give rugby a try.

As well as promoting women’s rugby, the calendar supports the work of Beat, which is based in Norfolk. Fighting for a more comprehensive approach to eating disorders in the UK, the organisation helps people of all ages struggling with eating disorders and body image. In their calendar, the OURFC women wanted to show how positively the body can be perceived, insisting that their photos were not photoshopped before printing.

“Rugby is a sport for players of a variety of strengths and sizes”, the team’s captain Carly Bliss told Cherwell. Donating £1 from each calendar sold, the team hopes to reach or surpass the amount raised for mental health campaign Mind Your Head the last time the charity calendar initiative took place. Proceeds will also go towards promoting the club’s development, following financial troubles that have threatened the team’s continued existence in the past.

OUWRFC President Helen Lamb suggested the undetaking has also strengthened the bonds between team members, telling Cherwell, “The majority of the team had never considered doing a naked calendar before but it was obvious that everyone was really keen to give it a go.

“It allows us to demonstrate the hard work we put in all year round and highlight the level of women’s rugby at Oxford and Cambridge.”

The calendars are currently available to buy online, with a discount for members of the University

Security Services distribute terrorist warning posters

0

Terrorism contigency posters have been distributed across the University, including at University libraries, Merton, St Catherine’s, Christ Church, and the History Faculty buildings.

The posters encourage students to evacuate or hide in the event of an “incident”, before going on to mention terrorism explicitly. One section reads, “Staff and students should remain alert to the danger of terrorism but should not let the fear of terrorism stop them from going about their day-to-day life as normal.”

The University has been keen to reassure anxious students, including one passage on the poster’s design reading, “the purpose of this guidance is to alert and not to alarm – it is not being provided in response to any specific information.”

The posters were recently circulated in an email, to all students in the History Faculty, which referred to the terrorist attacks in Paris earlier this month. The notice stated, “In light of events in Paris over the weekend all University departments have been asked to circulate the attached information sheet. Colleges have been similarly advised. Thames Valley Police advises that people should continue to go about their business as normal but remain vigilant.”

The History Faculty’s Head of Administration and Finance, David Hyland, who sent the original email, said that he decided “that it would also be helpful to circulate it now by email to all students, in light of recent events in Paris and elsewhere.” He added, “Not all History students come into the main Faculty building all that often and so several students might not have read the notice.”

In a separate statement, a University spokesperson underlined the University’s commitment to the government’s anti-terror ‘Prevent’ programme and that the alerts were purely precautionary. The statement read, “In the light of a number of armed attacks around the world recently, the University’s Security Sub-committee, in consultation with OUSU, has developed an information sheet for staff and students on what to do in the event of such an attack.

“It is important to note that this information is not being provided in response to a specific threat to the University, and staff and students should not be unnecessarily alarmed by it. However, the University believes that, given recent events around the world, it is sensible and appropriate to provide guidance on this issue, as it routinely does on other health and safety matters.”

OUSU’s BME Students Officer, Nikhil Venkatesh, told Cherwell, “It is of course important that the University and colleges take the security of students seriously, and the attacks in Paris show that we cannot assume we are always safe from terrorism. However, we need to be aware that increased fears about terrorism can be particularly harmful to Muslim students.

“They are now more likely to face Islamophobic attacks, or feel that people are scared of them, when the vast majority of Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. In fact, there are more racist attacks by white supremacists in Britain than there are terrorist attacks by Islamist extremists. The security of everyone is best served when we stand together, regardless of religion or background.”

Venkatesh continued, “This all ties into our concerns about the University’s implementation of ‘Prevent’: this legislation requires that staff monitor student events, our web usage and political views, and refer those who they think are at risk of ‘radicalisation’ to the police. We know that Muslim and BME students are more likely to be suspects in this regard, particularly as Prevent defines ‘extremism’ as holding views incompatible with ‘traditional British values’, whatever they are. There was a case of a student at another university who was arrested after a librarian saw him reading a book on terrorism. He was writing a thesis about terrorism and how to fight against it, but because he was Muslim he was immediately suspected.”

Analysis: Keep calm and stay vigilant: the need for doublethink (Freddie Hopkinson)

I must admit that, last Friday, when I first received an email from the History Faculty “in light of events in Paris over the weekend”, I was a little surprised. Even with attacks as close to home as those in Paris, it is always hard to envisage something like that ever happening to you. Looking again at the email made me realise that, as much as I would personally like to carry on as if nothing has happened, something about the events of two weeks ago has made people’s behaviour change. On one level or another, this year’s wave of terror attacks has found its way deep into the public’s subconscious.

The leaflet makes it clear that we should be “alert and not alarmed”, that we must not let fear of terrorism stop us from going about our day-to-day lives as normal, that, in the words of Thames Valley Police, we should remain “vigilant”. In all of these statements there is a strange paradox between the desire to ignore and defy the message of terror attacks and the need to be alert. It is almost as if the university authorities are afraid to admit that they are paranoid about the dangers of an attack.

If you bother to read the leaflet, you’ll find that it is mainly common sense. It seems to have been written long before any specific attack and screams the obvious: if you see an armed man or woman on campus, for God’s sake, call the police and get away.

What is more interesting about its circulation in some colleges and in my faculty is that people feel they have to say something now. Taking either perspective, this overreaction, or understatement, of the threat that could possibly face us represents a localised reaction to what is going on all over the world.

The wave of terror attacks that has devastated France, Kenya, and countless other places this year has, for the first time since 9/11, really forced people all over the world to reconsider their role in the global conflicts fundamentalists are trying to instigate. Sadly, this leaflet is yet another example of us being reluctantly drawn into a game of fear with our potential attackers. In universities all over the place, the depressing state of affairs that means students are being reminded to stay vigilant is a sign that the times have changed – we can no longer naturally assume safety on our own campuses.

Perhaps one day there will be an attack like the one described in the leaflet here in Oxford, and perhaps the instructions on this leaflet will save someone’s life – I can only hope and pray that there isn’t. In the meantime, we need to take the leaflet’s advice and not be too alarmed by the possibility of an attack.

In a global context, our continuation of our studies, our interests and our social lives is the most significant thing that we can do to defy those that want to intimidate us. Only by carrying on as normal will we show up the warped logic behind terrorism.

Students to protest airstrikes on Syria

0

Hundreds of students are expected to march through Oxford in a peaceful protest against air strikes on Syria.

Over 400 people have so far shown interest in attending on the protest’s Facebook event, organised in co-ordination with the national Stop the War Coalition.

The protest comes in response to the Prime Minister’s announcement that he will call a vote in the Commons on Syrian air strikes next month if he expects to win it, even without the backing of the UN Security Council.

A spokesperson from Oxford Stop the War, which is organising the protest, told Cherwell, “As predicted, the Prime Minister has put forward an illogical and misguided argument for British air strikes in Syria. He has not been able to explain how British airstrikes would alter the situation, particularly given the fact that Isis has continued to grow during the past 13 months of US led airstrikes.

“It is clear that British action would result in more civilian deaths and more Syrian refugees desperately fleeing the carnage that engulfs their country. The British public were rightly moved and upset by the pictures of despairing Syrian refugees during the summer and so it seems ludicrous that the British government would act to worsen the situation. In fact, the action Cameron is proposing is likely to lead to a deep civil war, ensuring more bloodshed, more carnage and more refugees.

“British intervention in Syria is precisely what Isis wants, magnifying Islamophobia and fuelling their narrative of division between Islam and the West. British action fortifies their propaganda, increasing their numbers and intensifying the terrorist threat to our streets.

“If our government is to take the threat of Isis seriously, it must first go after our supposed ‘allies’ that supply them with arms and trade, enabling them to continue expanding.

“We are asking the good people of Oxford to gather on Saturday afternoon (12pm – Bonn Square) to show David Cameron and his government that we will not be silent as he attempts to drag us into yet another hopeless war.”