Saturday, May 31, 2025
Blog Page 1148

Surviving in Shanghai: Part 2

0

It’s now been six weeks since I arrived in Shanghai and the dreams of home and the ability to walk outside and not feel like I’m in a sauna are just around the corner. Since last month, we’ve really been indulging in the Chinese culture, whether that be in what we eat, the customs we imbibe or the language we learn. Indeed, I can now order a meal and actually get something which vaguely resembles what I requested.

I’m working at the British Chamber of Commerce, a non-for-profit organisation supporting British businesses here in China and I have to say, it’s probably the most varied job I could have wished for. One minute you’re sat behind a desk writing flyers and proofreading (the task every English speaker here seems to have been set) and the next you’re meeting the Consul-General to Shanghai in a five star hotel with canapés circulating around you in a never ending tornado of decadence. You also get to go to business meetings, where there are occasionally freebies, such as the free breakfast we had at Shanghai’s first Pret a Manger a couple of weeks ago!

But Chinese culture continues to baffle me. Particularly the photo taking and the staring, which hasn’t subsided at all. A couple of weeks ago, we went to Hangzhou on a high-speed train, which is around 100 miles from Shanghai, and saw the most beautiful lake before hiking up a hill to a Taoist temple. However, when one of our friends was taking our photo, a lot of locals joined in and took photos of us too. At one point, a queue actually began to form and we were viewed as film stars. But the Chinese are always game for a laugh and are extremely hospitable people so the odd bit of cultural difference is what makes the whole experience worthwhile.

One thing that has astounded me is just how diverse Shanghai is. Some people have a tendency to generalise China and Chinese culture as one entity. But there’s such a vast range of customs and culture here specific to each region with which it’s impossible and flawed to identify all 1.35 billion people. Particularly here, you can find yourself in a church, wandering some back alleyways, visiting a temple and having a drink on a rooftop bar (think Bridge VIP without the darkness or the stench of alcohol) all in the same day and within a few metres of each other.

That obviously leads to a wide variety of cultural insights and many different experiences, even within this little enclave on the eastern edge of China. I’ve seen just about everything from hangouts of the wealthy in Lujiazui, the deeply-rooted traditions of the temples and even a migrant children’s school located in suburbia.

However, one thing that’s always a guarantee wherever you are in Shanghai is that it’s going to very hot, almost insufferably so. One day it reached 53 degrees Celsius, which would have been unimaginable before I came but is actually not too bad for a short amount of time. Indeed, you seem to spend your time searching for air conditioning and bottled water all day long, which takes you on a whistle-stop tour of all the local convenience stores.

Right now, I’m beginning to look forward to home. Although I can still stick it out another week or so before I’ll actually want to go home as we’re just starting to run out of things to do here. I think the best way to describe what we’ve seen would be ‘little bits of everything’. I’m well aware that I’ve only scratched the surface of China, particularly as Shanghai is rather sheltered from the rest of the country, but there has been nothing quite like what I have seen, which has only spurred me on to come back some day.

I’ve occasionally thought whether I could handle life as an expatriate here and there are quite a few  reasons I feel I couldn’t (pollution, the language barrier and the lack of personal freedom.) But the life of the nation’s upper classes sitting outside having alfresco dinners, climbing skyscrapers and going to five star hotels is, of course, very appealing. So I guess it’s not so much a case of whether I’ll come back to China but rather when and where I’ll go.

I’ve never been a reckless person but coming here was a rather whimsical decision. It’s certainly the best impulsive decision I’ve ever made because it’s brought me all this way to perhaps the best city I’ve ever visited. Even though I miss home a lot and am now starting to dream of standing in some fresh air out in the British countryside where there aren’t any skyscrapers, the memories, the laughter and the many insights I’ve received into how China works have equipped with more knowledge than a lecture course at Oxford could ever provide. So I guess you could say this has been the trip of a lifetime, and one that will live long in my mind for many years to come.

If you want to follow my trip in more detail, see my blog at fromshanghaitogermany.wordpress.com.

Interview: tasting heaven with chocolatier Brandt Maybury

0

Brandt Maybury arguably has the best job in the world. Working as the Taste Specialist at Green & Blacks, he is paid to eat delicious organic chocolate all day. But at the same time, Brandt’s job is a lot more than taxing than just tingling those taste buds; he helps make people’s lives a little bit better through promoting ethical sourcing and secure prices for cocoa farmers.

It’s tempting to liken Brandt to a modern-day alchemist or Willy Wonka. This is after all a man who spends his days swirling weird and wonderful ingredients into bowls of warm, delicious melted chocolate. His goal; to discover a miraculous new recipe to outdo the unprecedented success of Green & Blacks’ Maya Gold in 1994.

But is this really what its all about, I ask him?

“Being Taste Specialist at Green & Blacks is such a fun job – not just because I get to work with chocolate everyday – but also because of the people I work with and the history of the brand. I feel really proud to be one of the team.”

Tactful. But no information about how much chocolate eating he really gets to do.

I am, however, happy and amazed to find out that chocolate tasting, aka most of the publics’ dream activity, is just as much a refined and skillful art as wine tasting. “First, I inspect the chocolate to make sure it has a good shine and a good snap,” Brandt tells me, “then I have a smell to see what aromas I can detect. I then pop the chocolate in my mouth, break it a few times with, before allowing it to slowly melt to appreciate the flavours and textures – chocolate should always be lovely and smooth, never gritty or chalky.” Chocolate tasting… hmm… could there be a new society on the horizon at Fresher’s fair?

Indulging in Fairtrade Organic chocolate whilst living on a student shoestring budget can be tricky. But Brandt is insistent that it’s worth spending that little bit more on good quality chocolate. Although it is a bit pricier, a bar of premium chocolate lasts the average muncher a lot longer than a bar of Tesco Value: “the higher cocoa content means that most people find a little bit goes a long way.”

But the chocolate doesn’t only last longer- it tastes far better. “Because farmers can’t rely on artificial fertilizers or pesticides, they have to give extra care and attention to their crop,” ensuring that the chocolate really does taste better. And of course, “everything tastes a little bit sweeter, knowing that your money is helping to support Fairtrade farming communities all over the world.”

As well as tasting, Brandt loves to toy with flavours. One of Brandt’s latest inventions is the Salted Caramel THIN bar; perhaps not as crazy as Willy Wonka’s everlasting gobstoppers or chocolate grass. But Brandt is confident that his new flavours, and those on the horizon, will stand the test of time.

“I see other brands going with crazy flavours such as Wasabi, Marmite and Tabasco… however more often than not they tend to be a flash in the pan.”

Brandt’s favourite chocolate (as we speak) and one of my all-time favourites is Spiced Chilli, and I can’t help wondering what exactly it is that make certain unlikely flavours so unbelievably good.

“With over 600 different flavor compounds in cocoa, there are so many things that work well with chocolate. We always think of chocolate as a sweet food because that is how we normally enjoy it. However, it also works well with savory flavours and in savoury dishes. Try finishing off a pot of chilli con carne with a couple of squares of 85% dark chocolate if you don’t believe me and see how surprisingly good it is.”

Finally, I ask Brandt to give me a recipe to satisfy chocoholics with no cooking skills, a busy schedule and a student budget. The wizard of chocolate seemed unphased by the limiting criteria. He gives us the recipe for ‘Sea Water Truffles’: something truly delicious and a little bit different.

 

Ingredients:

 

150g Green & Black’s cooking milk chocolate

100ml water

4g flakey sea salt

100g Good quality cocoa for dusting

 

Method:

 

Break/chop the chocolate in to small pieces. Place in a bowl sat on a set of digital scales. Bring the water and salt to the boil in a small saucepan, and remove from the heat. Pour 45g of the boiled water over the chocolate and mix until smooth. Place in the fridge to set (about 3 hours.)


To make the truffles, use a teaspoon to scoop out pieces of the ganache and place these on to a cool plate. Next, sieve the cocoa powder in to a bowl. Roll a piece of ganache in your hands to the desired shape, and drop in to the cocoa powder. Swirl the bowl around in a circular motion, allowing the truffle to roll in the cocoa powder until fully coated. Repeat with the rest of the truffles (you will eventually get messy hands, but just keep going.)

 

Keep the truffles in the bowl of cocoa powder, placed in the fridge, until ready to serve. Then lightly shake off the excess cocoa powder before serving. These are best eaten within 48 hours.

Park End undergoes rebranding and refurbishment

1

Lava & Ignite Nightclub in Oxford has revealed that it will be closing its doors for the final time and undergoing refurbishment before relaunching in time for the start of Michaelmas 2015.

In an announcement on their Facebook page, the nightclub said, “After an amazing few years of memories for thousands of clubbers, the Lava & Ignite party is coming to an end… It’s time we had one massive refurbishment!

“We launch as a brand new venue on Friday 11th September!”

The club will be holding a closing party on the weekend of 22nd August but will remain open until 28th August.

The new venue will be named Atik, with its location confirmed as Cantay House, Park End Street, where Lava & Ignite is currently based.

Lava & Ignite has also been promoting Atik on its Facebook page and sharing a number of Atik’s posts.

Atik stated, “The biggest nightclub in Oxford is having massive investment. We will be refurbishing and rebranding all 5 rooms with the latest sound systems, lights and funky themed bars!”

The regional director of Deltic Group, which owns Atik, Russell Quelch, said in a statement, “Lava & Ignite has been part of the Oxford scene for eight years, but it’s time to put it to rest and create an entirely new experience for today’s clubbers. We are confident that our existing and new customers will really enjoy the look and feel of Atik.

“With three distinct dance rooms, the club will cater for all tastes. For retro fans, Vinyl will feature an illuminated dance floor playing pop classics, the main dance room, Atik, will offer the very best in light and sound technology and Curve will have an R&B vibe. A new tiki inspired bar, Lualalai, will serve a wide range of specialist cocktails and treasure chest sharers as well as host cocktail making parties. Table service will also be more widely available with the addition of 18 VIP booths.

“We are going to raise our game, whilst not alienating our core audience,” added Russell.  “We will still have mid-week student nights and hope to attract a more local audience at the weekend. With a line-up of internationally acclaimed DJs and celebrity appearances, we are confident that Atik will be a big hit!”

It also appealed for staff for the new club for “a fantastic new team”, although both clubs are yet to confirm whether there is to be a complete overhaul of staff and bouncers. Staff at the venue have come under criticism by university students in the last academic year over allegations of homophobia.

Atik, which described itself as “the fastest growing nightclub company in the UK” said, “
We are recruiting for a number of positions these include Hosts 
[and] Bar Staff
… Previous experience is not necessary, all we require is people with the right attitude.

Lava & Ignite and Atik have both been contacted for comment.

Oxford conservation donor counters pro-hunting accusations

0

An Oxford University conservation unit responsible for tracking lions has responded to allegations that it accepted donations from a pro-hunting organisation.

Since the reportedly illegal killing of a lion, Cecil, that was being tracked by Oxford University’s Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), donations to the unit have topped half a million pounds, founder and Director Professor David Macdonald told Cherwell on Monday.

Oxford alumnus and US philanthropist Dr Tom Kaplan added to the funds, pledging on July 31 to match up to $100,000 in donations made to WildCRU. Dr Kaplan is the founder of field conservation group Panthera, and made his fortune investing in precious metals.

Following the pledge, Professor Macdonald told Cherwell, “Dr Kaplan and his wife, Daphne, have been wonderful supporters of WildCRU, and I am deeply grateful. In the context of big cat conservation, he is the greatest living philanthropist”.

However, WildCRU faced accusations of receiving funds from pro-hunting organisations after a blog post by Panthera Executive Vice-President Dr Luke Hunter surfaced on Tuesday.

In the blog post, Dr Hunter writes, “Just as strong, empirical science has shown that over-hunting is bad for lions, it also demonstrates that hunting can be sustainable […] Hunting survives because hunters are usually more tolerant of hardship, and they pay extraordinary sums – up to $125,000 – to shoot a male lion. The business requires only a handful of rifle-toting visitors to prosper which, in principle, helps protect those areas”. 

He continues, “Let me state it again; I think sport hunting big cats is repellent and I would welcome its demise. But my personal distaste for hunting won’t help lions if shutting it down removes protection from African wilderness”.

In response to the accusations made toward Panthera, Dr Kaplan told Cherwell in an interview, “Luke Hunter has done more for lion conservation across its range than anyone I know. Luke and I started Project Leonardo, which is the only range-wide program for the conservation of the African lion. To see him labelled as pro-hunting is absurd.”

When queried about Panthera’s view on sustainable trophy hunting, Dr Kaplan said, “No organisation in the world is doing more to protect big cats. It is now the largest NGO that focuses solely on big cat conservation. None of us like hunting big cats. None of us advocate hunting. Although, professionally, conservationists have to face the reality that lions are hunted for trophies, personally we can’t relate to it, it’s not in our DNA. It goes against everything that motivates us in our passion for conserving wildlife.”

Professor Macdonald also expressed WildCRU’s stance on sustainable trophy hunting, stating, “Modern conservation is highly inter-disciplinary – biology is necessary but not sufficient. Ultimately it is about how society wishes to live alongside wildlife, hopefully for the well-being of both. We are an evidence-based organisation, not an advocacy one, so we strive to provide the evidence that informs policy and mitigates the conflicts between people and wildlife”.

Dr Kaplan and Professor Macdonald began working together when WildCRU was founded in 1986, in what Dr Kaplan describes as a “rewarding relationship”, to focus lion conservation efforts within Hwange National Park, where Cecil was killed. At first, Professor Macdonald experienced conflict with the Zimbabwean government on matters of hunting law and policy, but Dr Kaplan claims that “WildCRU have proven themselves to be excellent at proving scientifically the effects of hunting, thereby mitigating its effects, and even changing the laws.

“Look at what they’ve done in Zimbabwe. In the early 2000s, the lion quota [limiting the number of lions that were legally allowed to be hunted] in the concessions around Hwange was 60. WildCRU’s science resulted in a hunting moratorium for three years, after which the revised quota was four.”

Dr Kaplan, stressing his view of the importance of the work done by both organisations, continued, “If you strip out the emotion, the most important aspect of this whole discussion is that it is highlighting the really unknown story of the imperilled nature of the African lion. People assume that because they’re social animals and allow themselves to be seen, that they are ubiquitous. A century ago there were 200,000 lions; now we’re maybe down to 20-30,000.

“An example of how this cat is ‘disappearing in plain sight’ is the data that was collected in West Africa, where we were told there were 21 areas where lions were thriving. When Project Leonardo’s study was released a year ago, there were only four areas in which they existed at all, and only one area in which there were more than 50 lions.”

Both Dr Kaplan and Professor Macdonald expressed their belief in the positive outcomes that could arise from the public outcry over Cecil’s death. Dr Kaplan told Cherwell, “We need to take the interest that has gone viral, and turn it into a movement. The leading players in this field, Panthera, WildCRU and others, should converge into a partnership so they can express both the current state of the lion population, and concrete ways in which the decline can be reversed. In this way, the spirit that has been unleashed from Cecil’s sad fate, and the renewed donor interest, can be translated into an enduring and sustainable victory for conservation”.

Professor Macdonald stated, “While the illegal death of Cecil was a tragedy, our hope is that something good will come of it. I think the extraordinary reaction around the world transcends concern for Cecil, or even just for lions, but reveals that millions of people care about wildlife, the environment and how people are to live alongside the nature on whose ecosystem services we all depend”.

Debate: Is Jeremy Corbyn the Best Choice For Labour?

Yes

Emmeline Skinner Cassidy

 

Two weeks ago I joined the Labour Party and signed up to support Corbyn’s campaign. To lots of people, there is only one explanation for this bizarre behaviour: I am just another hopeless idealist whose dreams have yet to come tumbling down. Yet, I will be voting for Corbyn because I believe that his vision for the UK is simultaneously more viable and more humane than that of the current government.

For the past five years the Tories have managed to write the narrative on the economy and be believed, regardless of the mountain of evidence against them. Consequently, anyone who dares to propose an alternative to austerity is branded an irresponsible radical.

Yet, Corbyn’s anti-austerity position is increasingly the consensus amongst Britain’s academic economists. Strikingly, the Centre for Macroeconomics recently reported that only 15 percent of British economists polled agreed that the coalition’s austerity policies had had a positive effect on aggregate economic activity.

This view goes beyond the British academic bubble; the governors of the central banks of the UK and the US both admit that temporary cuts in government spending have been contractionary. The IMF’s chief economist, Olivier Blanchard, recently stated that the IMF had hugely underestimated the negative effect of cuts on weak economies. Even Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman has written that British politicians are just about the only people still convinced by the ideology of austerity.

Whether an economy is prospering or failing has no inherent value: meaning is derived from how economies affect human society. Austerity ignores human imperatives and makes cuts that dramatically reduce people’s quality of life. Between 2014-15 more than one million people in the UK relied on food banks. Since 2012, more than 300,000 children have been pushed below the poverty line. On top of all of this, a recent Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) report has revealed that 78 per cent of disabled people say that their health has deteriorated as a result of the stress of undergoing a work capability assessment.

An economic policy can’t be labelled a ‘solution’ when it creates problems that are both unacceptable from a compassionate view and financially unsustainable. Cuts that significantly reduce quality of life trap us in a cycle of decline – disadvantaged people become increasingly worse-off and are increasingly forced to turn to government support. Only 140 18 to 21-year olds need to become homeless as a result of Tory cuts to their housing benefit before the policy actually begins to start costing money.

We need an economic policy that will not lose its grip on spending, but will recognise that the protection of the vulnerable is paramount. This is what Corbyn’s policies will achieve. Corbyn understands that we can’t run an unsustainable deficit. He proposes to manage this through cracking down on tax avoidance amongst the wealthiest individuals and companies in the UK, while also stimulating the economy through controlled quantitative easing.

I am aware that Corbyn’s election could cause Labour to split, but I think that a soul-searching, identity-defining debate is exactly what Labour needs. Labour is currently unelectable because it attempts to stand for everything and thus stands for absolutely nothing. Labour can’t continue courting votes from every section of the electorate by effectively toeing the same austerity-loving, immigrant-hating, welfare-bashing line as the Tories.

Labour needs to make a decision and, realistically, this means moving left. If Labour moves to the right then the biggest choice facing the electorate in 2020 will be which colour we prefer: red or blue. Apathy was arguably Labour’s biggest enemy in 2015: of the 34.9 per cent of the population who didn’t vote, the majority were previous Labour supporters. If Labour had motivated just one in five people who didn’t vote then there could have been a Labour government in power today. Labour needs to offer something that will inspire people, and watered-down Tory policies will not do this.

There is a massive gap in British politics for a credible left-wing party. In the 2015 election left-leaning voters were stranded without a single decent option. This is the ground that Labour needs to occupy, and Corbyn is the only candidate who will take us there.

Having an ideology is not a weakness. Having ideology and conviction, unfortunately, is what made Thatcher and her legacy so potent, and Osborne and his anti-austerity politics so dominant today. In 2015 the Tories had a clear ideological message and they cruised to victory. Labour stood for nothing, confused people with their attempt to commit to absolutely everything, and crashed into spectacular failure.

Labour desperately needs a principled leadership. Under Corbyn, Labour’s principles will mean a net below which no person should ever fall  a point beyond which we recognise that no human should ever be treated like this. Corbyn is what an electable Labour Party looks like. 

No

Daniel Minister

 

I like Jeremy Corbyn. In fact, his views are probably closer to my own than the rest of the candidates. The problem I have is that in the current political climate, he can’t win short of a crisis for the government, and many of his die-hard supporters don’t seem to care. The Corbyn camp seems frustratingly divided in their ambitions. Whilst some have the greatest intentions, others are playing internal party-politics. Their tactics do not add up, and will leave Labour in opposition for the sake of petty ideological rivalries.

Most supporters seem to believe that Corbyn can win thanks to an upsurge in the non-voting masses enthused by his anti-austerity platform. It’s as if the arguments of the Greens or Plaid Cymru never existed. They believe that Corbyn, with his well-attended rallies up and down the country, can bring together a coalition of non-voting students, pensioners, and the disillusioned. Such a tactic only ever results in limited returns. Corbyn will solidify the core vote, but achieve little else.

A grassroots-driven campaign like Corbyn’s echoes the American examples of Barry Goldwater and George McGovern. Like the Corbyn campaign, Goldwater’s and McGovern’s had hope on their side. Who could vote Nixon at the height of Vietnam? Turned out that 60 per cent of the electorate could. The messages given by their campaigns were simply too sectional. They appealed to ‘true believers’ on the left and right; those convinced they were on the cusp of victory, surrounded by the likeminded. Given the choice of two evils, the moderate centre opted for the one they knew, or neither.

An appeal to the ‘true believers’ will not succeed in mobilizing an army of anti-austerity voters, and the electoral system will make sure of it. The Conservatives will be doing everything to cling onto their 36 per cent of the vote and solidify their own position, with the help of the Coalition’s mothballed boundary reforms. Meanwhile, the SNP’s near total dominance over Scotland won’t suddenly collapse with a copycat Labour leader. The SNP has the upper hand; they can always put Scotland first. In turn, just as the first past the post system helps the undivided nationalist vote hold Scotland, the thinly spread nature of Corbyn’s ideal coalition of voters won’t win seats off the Tories.

Corbyn will find it very difficult to usurp the Tory vote in marginal, let alone safer, seats. While a constituency like Gower might fall easily, somewhere like Nuneaton will be a lot harder. Nuneaton had an above-average turnout of 67 per cent where the Tory vote increased while the Labour vote fell. If Corbyn were to convince the Greens and TUSC supporters to vote Labour, it would be nowhere near enough to overtake the incumbent Marcus Jones. Labour would need to entice 5,000 voters to overtake the Tories. And we cannot be certain that there aren’t non-voting Tories who can match that number. After all, many Tory safe-seats saw rising turnouts, as their constituents feared a Labour-SNP coalition.

Under Corbyn, Labour may start piling up votes in poorer safe-seats adversely affected by austerity, but this won’t help in the marginals. While Nuneaton moved further away from Labour in 2015, safe-seats like Sunderland Central moved closer. As they see their circumstances recover, marginal voters will be even harder to convince. The gamble of voting for a Corbyn-led Labour will not be worth the risk.

Labour needs to win over marginal voters to win the election and actually get into government, where it can help those affected by austerity. Many Corbyn-supporters seem bent on focusing on Labour values and ideology. They want revenge on New Labour by swinging back to the left, instead of a strategy that will win back seats in 2020. If Labour party members choose Corbyn, they will only prolong the Bedroom Tax and allow the government to continue cutting support for the poorest and most vulnerable. Corbyn should certainly be a part of the new Labour opposition, but, sadly, it’s not the right time for a man like him to lead it to victory. 

Drake’s ghostwriter: does it really matter?

0

Does it matter if Drake wrote his own lyrics?

Let’s face it: he probably doesn’t write them. Despite some impressive ether aimed at Meek Mill over the last week culminating in a brutal, meme-laden OVO Fest, and an almost unanimous reaction in the hip-hop community that he has been winning this beef so far, he has yet to deny the claims the Philly rapper laid at his door. Drake’s producer 40 spoke out but didn’t outright deny them. What’s more, supposed true lyricist Quentin Miller is uncredited on Meek’s “RICO”, the track that started the whole beef, so his supposed title of “co-writer” seems not to carry much weight.

Assuming, on the balance of probability, that Drake doesn’t write his lyrics, we’re forced to address the question of the extent to which we can take an artist and their art separately. If we admire a painting by someone, or enjoy the music or writing of an individual, then find out that they didn’t create their work then does it lessen our enjoyment?

In art, the same sort of dilemma has applied when it emerged that many of the most prominent names in Abstract Expressionism, including such titans as Rothko and Pollock, were sponsored by the CIA to promote their art and its inherently capitalist nature as the Cold War got underway. Like hip-hop, Expressionist art relies on the premise that only one person could have made a work – that it is an extension of them, and their character, and of the truth. What, then, to do when this is thrown into question?

There are two ways of dealing with the murky relationship between an artist and their creations.

One is a matter of extremity, in either direction. An attitude can be taken that it doesn’t matter – we can still imagine the imagery Drake evokes in his lyrics, still admire his flow and delivery, still enjoy 40’s production and still sing or dance (or do whatever else people like to do) to his music. Or we can reject him as fake, make comparisons to Milli Vanilli, claim we always thought he was soft and not “real” hip-hop.

The other option is more nuanced. Why not accept that Drake uses a ghostwriter, but that his music still has an intensely personal edge? The possibility that some, but not all his songs are ghostwritten leaves more space for him to remain a credible artist in the eyes of purists. After all, Michelangelo didn’t paint the Sistine Chapel – he had a team of helpers and did the important bits himself. Kanye uses ghostwriters and doesn’t give a shit. So did Dre. It’s a tactic that increases output and ultimately allows us to enjoy more art created by these inspired people.

It’s probably obvious that I subscribe to this line of thought. For an artist as successful as Drake to be as prolific as he is, it would be disingenuous to kid oneself into believing there was no-one else behind him. Drake’s doing bigger numbers than the Beatles in the USA – of course he didn’t sit there for an hour writing the lyrics to that B-side about sexing women and body lotion and late-night self-doubt.

But. There are some songs that I can’t believe he didn’t write himself. Namely, the ones that are so closely linked to his past and his life before fame that no-one could know about the subject matter except him. In “You and the Six”, Drake recounts talking to his mother, worrying about what she thinks of his lifestyle and mulling her separation from his father. He refers to visiting his dad in Memphis as a kid. In “Club Paradise”, Drake name drops specific figures from the past from whom he had grown apart, regretting the passage of time and his gradual alienation from his old circles in Toronto.

All that needs to be said about these lines is that it would be indescribably cynical if someone else wrote them, not to mention the fact it’d be almost impossible to do so. Would a ghostwriter really write about “Rosemary” or “Leanne Sealy”? Did Drake simply tell Quentin Miller to name-drop these women? Does he really not know them at all? Again, I can’t bring myself to believe that they are anything other than real people from Drake’s past, about whom he is writing honestly.

So no, even if some of Drake’s songs are ghostwritten, if it means we get to experience more music from a hugely prolific artist of great talent and even greater influence, then long may it continue. Just so long as that core element of truth remains.

Review: Tame Impala – Currents

0

★★★☆☆
Three stars

Much of the critical reception of Tame Impala’s third album Currents has focused on setting it apart as something totally fresh for Kevin Parker. Listening to the album, it becomes clear that the transition is present but exaggerated. While the album has an undeniably new electronic gleam, in many ways it simply carries on Parker’s obvious fascination with melody and rhythm, psychedelia and isolation from earlier albums. Thematically, the album’s opener, ‘Let it Happen’ has a lot in common with Innerspeaker’s ‘Desire Be Desire Go’ and Lonerism’s ‘Nothing That Has Happened So Far Has Been Anything We Could Control’. The lengthy, meandering track, one of the strongest on a strong album, illustrates that ‘go with the flow’ mentality that Parker’s music has become known for; its melody shifts and trips over itself as though literally caught in a groove. Perhaps, then, Tame Impala’s electric makeover is not such a sharp departure after all.

As time has gone on, Parker has become less and less bothered about passing off Tame Impala as anything other than a solo project, and Currents is his most personal and direct album to date. The album’s aural shifts reflect his lyrical obsession with moments of change, anticipation, regret and a sense of self that fluctuates in strength. The subject matter isn’t always subtle- one track is titled ‘Yes I’m Changing’- but it doesn’t need to be. Parker’s personal and revealing lyrics are part of what allows Tame Impala to retain a sense of intimacy even within stadium-ready power ballads. It’s what makes Tame Impala’s music so equally suited to gloom and celebration.

Throughout the album, Parker relies on that pleasantly jarring combination of lyrics that reflect melancholy isolation, and melodies that have a bright, summery simplicity. His falsetto is as emotive and slightly saccharine as ever. Currents feels new partly because it takes elements that have always worked for Tame Impala and dials them up to saturation point. It’s this maximalism that makes the album absorbing, satisfying, but also a little over-ripe in places (the self-parodying silliness of ‘Past Life’ just feels out of place). It also means that anyone coming to the album in the hope of anything startlingly experimental will almost certainly be disappointed. Currents, despite what several critics have implied, is not the Kid A to Lonerism’s OK Computer. Parker has simply traded his psych-rock vibe for a different kind of nostalgia, his own version of smooth 70’s radio hits. It’s a sound that suits him. The most enjoyable elements of the album are in its addictive simplicity; the immediately memorable bass line that launches ‘Eventually’ and the tuneful riffs of ‘’Cause I’m a Man’.

From Talking Heads to Arcade Fire, Tame Impala is hardly the first rock band to turn to, in Parker’s own words, ‘dorky, white disco funk’, and in 2015 genre labels like ‘rock band’ feel increasingly unstable anyway. Parker’s guitar was always so heavily doused in reverb and skilfully refracted through studio manipulation, that the shift to synth hardly comes as a shock, particularly when it is delivered with the pure melodic ease that Tame Impala fans have come to expect. Currents may not be a shocking or an extraordinary album, but it’s a highly enjoyable one, and that’s more than enough.

It’s Not All Hummus and Halloumi, You Know

0

As a returning student from my year abroad last year, I knew I would miss Middle Eastern food the most. Arabic food has really come into its own in recent years in the UK, as classics like hummus, falafel and halloumi have become staples to the bourgeois diet. However, there are some things that Brits never seem to understand when it comes to Middle Eastern food. I mean, hummus is not the be-all-and-end-all. And who knew falafel was a breakfast item, eh? I list here, one year on, my top ten Arabic/Turkish foods in the hope that some of you might see how much more there is than a halloumi wrap.

1) The Arabic Hummus

Arabic hummus is made slightly differently to its Greek counterpart. Whereas the Greeks favour a grainier, coarser texture, the Arabs have developed a much smoother paste. A simple recipe for hummus is to mix tahini sauce and lemon juice together in a bowl, forming a thick paste. Then add some chickpeas, some cumin and some coriander, alongside the world’s best friend: salt. Whizz these together using your food processor – it is much harder without; I guess you could try mashing it? Add some oil (a healthy glug of olive oil never hurt anyone) and a dash of water – I recommend about 1.5 tbsp worth – to make it thinner. 

The beauty of hummus is how you can flavour it. Lemon and coriander. Roasted red pepper, Onion and balsamic vinegar – and these are just a few of the styles I have tried. Hummus, the ever popular dish, I fear I shall not meet you again in your best form until my next return to the Middle East. Let’s face it: Brits really do mess it up. Adieu, universal dip of choice. 

2) Muffarakah bilbaiyḍ – A.K.A. potato and eggs

I remember walking into the hole-in-the-wall pokey cafe next to our institute one Winter’s morning, freezing in about 6 layers, with a stomach fit to eat itself in hunger. Never had I tried their food, where they prepared it I know not, as the cafe  was only big enough for about 6 people, and invariably there were about 5 customers. I had always stuck to a simple Turkish Coffee, its mud texture attributable to the ‘stringent’ cleaning practices the cafe undertook. However, this one morning I looked at their food menu and saw ‘Maffarakah bilBiyD’ scrawled in English at the bottom. The cheapest – therefore, the best, surely!

Well, it made its way into my heart and throughout that cold, cold winter you could see me often chomping on such a sandwich. The stodge was unbelievable – potatoes, eggs, bread – heaven! Having explored Amman’s culinary scene extensively (more to come,) I often go for this dish out now, as it really is a winner and usually comes with meat as well. 

It is basically fried onions, meat, potatoes and eggs and in tiny cubes. If you ever see this on a menu, have it. I guarantee you’ll never cook it!

3) Mansaf

Where would Jordan be without its Mansaf? Mansaf, Jordan’s national dish, is a very serious business. From Tefila to Irbid, Aqaba to Amman, Mansaf is enjoyed as a long and luxurious feast. In its essence, Mansaf is slow cooked lamb, sat atop a heap of slowly cooked rich and pine nuts, which is itself sat atop some thing bread. You finally pour over the jameed sauce – ranging from a thin sauce (Amman style) to a thick cheese (Southern style,) jameed is made from solidified goat’s milk and can be found at all supermarkets.

The rice is cooked in ghee and absorbs all the wonderful fatty flavours from the clarified butter. The meal’s preparation takes hours. In Amman, you want to head down to Al-Quds or its neighbour Jabri for a cheap and semi-authentic Mansaf, whilst Sufra, one of Amman’s high-end restaurants, offers a much more tamed version, although one portion is still big enough for three! Anyone who tried this dish falls in love with it – give it a go!

4) Yalange

Yalange, better known as vine leaves, is another personal favourite. Whilst I have always preferred the meat-stuffed vine, the Jordanian lemon-stuffed is also a favourite. Personally, I have never undertaken this monumental challenge myself – vine leaves on average take about 2-3 hours to make – I lap them up at any opportunity. In fact, I even spent 7JD (About £6.50) on a huge tin of them to take home – what a bargain!

5) Sujuk, Nakanik and other sausages

Armenia, a land rich in cuisine and culture. I have always dreamed of doing a tour of Armenia and Georgia, such beauty can be found in their landscapes, their cultures and their languages – but more importantly their food.

Sujuk and Nakanik are both spicy forms of sausage found in this region. As it is made with beef, there are no food restrictions on this type of sausage, meaning it is enjoyed in the same way as bacon and pork sausages are. Often served with eggs for breakfast, I like to have Sujuk most as part of the hot mezze before any meal. I discovered this type of sausage in Ash-Shami in Oxford last year, and knew as soon as I had it that I loved it. Whenever I order Sujuk, I dream of that future holiday I will take to Armenia.

6) Sambousek.

Cheese, meat, spinach. Sambousek is really the most versatile of pastries. Personally, I think Georgian and Armenian cuisines will be the next big thing on the food scene – why not, they are perfect! Sambousek is an Arab variant of Georgian pastries, they sort of resemble an Indian samosa. 

Now loved across the region, my personal favourite comes stuffed with a gooey yummy melt-in-the-mouth cheese. They are crispy and warm and really hit the spot when you want a quick snack or, again, as part of the hot mezze. Whilst I have not seen spinach ones in Jordan, the meat sambousek is devoured as much as the cheese one, with a spicy warming aftertaste that leaves you perfectly satisfied by this Eastern delight.

7) Mana’eesh/Manaqeesh/Mana’ouche/Manageesh.

I, frankly, don’t care how you spell this. The Mana’eesh is the perfect breakfast. The ‘Arabic pizza’ is often how it is described, and I can guarantee that it is a hell of a lot nicer than it’s popular Italian counterpart. The best Mana’eesh I’ve had here would be the one I bought on the way to Church in Jabal Alluwebdeih. This tiny sunk-in-the-ground bakery appeared in front of me. All I could smell was egg, cheese, za’atar, tomato – I knew I was walking into second-brekkie teritory. 

Second breakfast was exactly it. I ordered myself a positively mind-boggling cheese and egg Mana’eesh, sat down and made my way through it with delectable delight – I got so wrapped up, I only made it to Church down the road 5 minutes before the start of Communion. Oops.

This breakfast really is a must-have. You can find it in many styles – in Lebanon, I’ve had it cooked on a Saj oven (a large dome) even. The za’atar variety is probably the majority favourite in the region, but, in my opinion, you can never have enough cheese.

8) The Lemon and Mint.

On a hot start-of-Summer’s day, I suddenly found myself wandering around Jabal Alluwebdeih (my favourite Jabal, if you’re interested) without very much to do. Settling myself in Jafra – one of my favourite eateries – I ordered my first lemon-mint since the end of October. I had almost forgotten what this fabulous drink tasted like. Sharp, sweet and soon-drunk, I’ve been a regular lemon-mint drinker since.

It’s a drink I’ve never seen in England – sharp lemon juice, equal parts with mint ground up with ice. It’s a slushie, but so much more. Jordan’s weather had truly become just-bearable – and only when you have a nice lemon-mint.

9) Mutable.

Mutable will always rest associated with some of my favourite memories in Jordan. Early on in the year, we all attended a cooking course at Beit Sitti (meaning Grandma’s House – how sweet) where we learnt how to make a mutable. Cooking the aubergines on an open flame until the skins become blackened and crispy, you remove the skin and ass to a pre-prepared mixture of lemon and tahini. The aubergine, cut up very small, added to the mixture creates a wonderful dip, akin to hummus. The finishing touch is a spoon or two of yoghurt and about 5 cloves of garlic. Truly, truly glorious.

The funny thing is that after this cooking course, I challenged my teacher to a duel: who could make it best? My oversight ting that she had made it at least ten times before was my downfall. Though she beat me resoundingly since then I have grown to perfect my mutable. It has become the centrepiece of every dinner we have held since. Guests love it. You’ll love it. Try it!

10) Muhammara.

Aleppo’s answer to the dip. Muhammara has become my favourite dip over the year, well surpassing mutable and hummus. I first tasted this beautiful dip on a trip to Istanbul, where culinary delights grabbed be my the throat. Subsequently only having eaten it twice more, perhaps its paucity in Jordan has made it my highest rate dish – who knows?

The dish itself is roasted red pepper mixed with pomegranate molasses, walnuts, garlic and lemon. The end flavour is simply indescribably good. Sat in King Hussein Park stuffing my face with my friend Emily’s muhammara and my mutable will always remain one of my favourite Jordanian picnics – her muhammara was overwhelmingly more popular than my mutable, I can tell you! The final time I visited Fakr Al-Din, Jordan’s most ‘exclusive’ restaurant, I had so much muhammara that I could barely eat the beautifully grilled lamb I had ordered. Fear not though, I made my way through it regardless.

And there you go – my top ten Middle Eastern/Turkish foods. This list is in no way comprehensive, and really I could wax lyrical about falafel, Armenian beef-and-eggs and the Israeli Sabich for days. I implore anyone who reads this to go out and try these wonderful foods. Beirut, famed for its foodie scene is a great place to go for some wonderful Middle Eastern food, but don’t discount Amman. The best hummus I’ve ever had was in Amman – Hashem’s restaurant, to be precise. My return to England was sweet, but I can’t help but feel saddened by the loss of all this wonderful cuisine. 

Beijing to host the 2022 Winter Olympics

0

Ever since the 2008 Summer Olympics, China has essentially become the world’s most enthusiastic party-planner – the 2009 60th anniversary celebration of the 1949 revolution, the 2010 Shanghai Expo and the Shenzhen Olympiad are prime examples of a series of major international events that have been held in China since the 2008 games, a résumé that even P. Diddy can’t compete with.

The 2022 Winter Olympic games, however, is a different ordeal that China will ultimately be able to deal with, but potentially at stunningly excessive costs. For pessimists, the 2022 games may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back – or for a more precise analogy, a pretty gigantic log on an already exhausted camel.

Historically, the economic costs alone of hosting the Olympic games have been phenomenal. The 2012 London Olympics cost over $14 billion, whilst the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics came to a mind-blowing $51 billion. Although the latter number is not a great reflection of how much the Chinese Winter games will cost given that Sochi’s venues and infrastructure had to be built essentially from scratch, it nonetheless depicts the consistent trend of Olympic fiscal madness, putting huge economic strains on the ‘lucky’ cities that gets to host them. It’s a trend convincing enough to persuade many bidders, including Oslo, Stockholm, lviv and Krakow, to drop out of the race by late 2014. Beijing may have proposed a rather conservative budget of $3.1 billion for 2022, but to call this optimistic would be an understatement.

The forecast budget seems more dreamy guestimate than shrewd calculatin when one considers that there isn’t actually any snow during January at the proposed venues, 50 to 100 miles north of Beijing. The IOC came to this conclusion in its 137-page evaluation of the two remaining bids from Beijing and Almaty, claiming that ‘the Zhangjiakou and Yanqing zones have minimal annual snowfall and for the Games would rely completely on artificial snow. There would be no opportunity to haul snow from higher elevations for contingency maintenance to the racecourses so a contingency plan would rely on stockpiled man-made snow.’ No wonder the Almaty campaign slogan was ‘Real snow, real winter ambience, real winter Games.’

It won’t be the first time that artificial snow is used for the Winter Olympics, but it will be the first time that no real snow will be involved at all. One wonders whether this will quite literally be a snow Olympics built on sand. 

In the face of all the scepticism and doubt, China remains confident about its ability to ‘present to the world a fantastic, extraordinary and excellent Olympic Winter Games in Beijing,’ as Xi Jinping, the Chinese Premier put it. Concerns over the practicalities have never stopped China, and the many hurdles it faces for the 2022 Games may be sidestepped effectively in the years to come. It helps that China’s domestic promotion of winter sports have taken the country by storm over the last decade, with the northeast provinces essentially transforming into China’s ‘little Switzerland’, scattered with over 500 skiing resorts.This ensures that not only will there be sufficient viewership demand to prevent the embarrassment of hosting the Games without an audience, but that the technology to provide artificial snow already exists and just needs to refined.

The rest of the required infrastructure already exists – the famous ‘Bird’s Nest’ stadium will be incorporated and the ‘Water Cube’, in which Michael Phelps shocked the world in 2008, will be (ingeniously) renamed the ‘Ice Cube.’

As veteran analyst Anne Stevenson-Yang claimed, ‘the (Chinese Communist Party’s) system excels at marshalling resources and deploying them at a single target.’ Now that the lense has shifted to the 2022 Winter Games there’s no reason that the Party will misfire. This is a State after all where no price is deemed too excessive for the prestige of hosting the Olympics. More than just a carnival of sport, for China the Winter Olympics is a golden ticketing into the high-rollers club of world politics.

For the Chinese people, on the other hand, opinion is divided. Some have legitimate worries about China’s human rights record, whilst others question whether the money devoted to 2022 could be better used.

The nationwide euphoria that accompanied the announcement of Beijing’s winning bid for the Summer Olympics in 2001 was also marred by similar concerns. Yet as time elapsed, excitement overwhelmed scepticism, and the whole nation was gradually enveloped in an Olympics-induced frenzy. With the 2022 Winter Games, China is again presented with the rare opportunity to provide a stimulant for the economy and, perhaps more importantly, a platform on which it can display the nation’s unity and progress.

If China plays its cards right, the excitement will be real even if the snow is not. 

Review: Man and Superman

0

 â˜…★★★☆

George Bernard Shaw couldn’t have described Man and Superman more simply or more adequately when he labelled it in 1903 a “comedy and a philosophy”. Incessantly verbose but always scathingly witty, there is socialist tact and moral didacticism at the heart of its four-hour running time. More often than not, the famous “Don Juan in Hell” scene is cut, but having experienced Simon Godwin’s triumphant production at the National Theatre it seems strange to imagine the play ever being performed without it.

The Don Juan myth is, after all, integral to the play. Shaw revamps the classic story with a Nietzschean twist in order to debate issues of man, marriage, and mutability. Ralph Fiennes is Jack Tanner, a notorious revolutionary cynic who wholeheartedly intends to remain a bachelor for the rest of his life. His self-assured path is shattered, however, at the persistence of young “boa constrictor” Ann Whitefield, who wishes more than anything to become Mrs. Tanner. At the whim of this basic narrative, Shaw catapults the play to and fro across an erratic global course – ranging from London to Granada, and of course casually stopping by in Hell itself. 

Godwin’s production is wise to take advantage of the ever-changing locations, which follow the course of Jack’s unpredictable odyssey to escape Ann’s clutches. The handsome study of Roebuck Ramsden morphs effortlessly into the sandy plains of Sierra Navada, but most spectacular of all is the stage assembled to depict Don Juan’s voyage to the underworld. Almost blinded by light, we find ourselves squinting at a bleached desert of emptiness, marked by a glistening elevator that travels back and forth between Heaven and Hell (equipped with a signature ding!). Upon the enormous upstage panels are ambiguous glacial images – surreal waves of movement – designed to subtly float and glide against the backdrop of Don Juan’s electric debate with the Devil. We see a colossal eye slowly blink, and shadowy figures walk briskly back and forth. These mirages are on the brink of becoming distracting, but the central discussion is just too fascinating to ignore. 

Fiennes is superbly charismatic and contradictory as both Tanner and Don Juan, not so much a Casanova as a Socratic substitute. His face-off with the Devil – deliciously played as a suavely baritone aristocrat by Tim McMullan – is richly compelling from start to finish. The entire scene isn’t essential to the narrative, of course, but it’s an enthralling consideration of the philosophy of man and the ‘life force’ that guides him. Adding impeccable blustering and pompous comedy is Nicholas le Provost as both Roebuck Ramsden and the Statue Don Gonzalo in Hell (sporting a delightfully tiny pair of angelic wings). Ramsden’s stoic conservatism is the perfect contrast to Tanner’s whirlwind revolutionary. Topping the leading cast off is Indira Varma as the domineeringly free-spirited Ann Whitefield (or Ana, in Hell), whose elegant man-eater is the ideal poised and cogent counterbalance to Fiennes’ irrationally slippery Jack Tanner.

The pseudo-modern setting is momentarily perplexing – an old-fashioned car is complicated by the brief and perhaps unnecessary use of a smartphone, but these are minor hiccups. The main issue of the play’s updating is that many of its central shock factors are diminished by our modern society; an unmarried pregnant woman and the struggles of an uneducated chauffeur are hardly scandalous or distressing to us now. In spite of this, however, Shaw’s play has aged remarkably well. We still muse every day on the hypocrisy and philosophy of humankind. We still fiercely debate the differences between men and women. We are still incessantly perplexed by the ‘life force’ pumping through our veins.